Read the case below and then answer the questions that follow. Following the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln on April 14, 1865, by John Wilkes Booth and John H. Surratt, one of Booth’s suspected accomplices, the secretary of war published the following reward offer in various newspapers: $25,000 reward to the person who apprehends John H. Surratt and a $10,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of John H. Surratt. Sometime afterward, a notice revoking the offer was published. Shuey, unaware that the offer had been revoked, reported information on the whereabouts of Surratt to the proper government officials. The information furnished by Shuey led to Surratt’s arrest. (Based on Shuey v. United States, 92 U.S. 73, 23 L. Ed. 697, 1875) 1. Was Shuey legally entitled to the reward? Explain your answer. __________________________________________________________________________ ____ __________________________________________________________________________ ____ __________________________________________________________________________ ____ 2. If Shuey had provided the information on Surratt before the reward offer was revoked, would he have been entitled to $25,000? Why or why not? __________________________________________________________________________ ____ __________________________________________________________________________ ____ __________________________________________________________________________ ____ __________________________________________________________________________ ____ __________________________________________________________________________ ____
The Second Amendment Primer: A Citizen's Guidebook to the History, Sources, and Authorities for the Constitutional Guarantee of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Mathilde Rocker, As Wife of Louis P. Rocker, Wage Earner v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of The Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 358 F.2d 119, 2d Cir. (1966)