Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effectivity of laws
GENERAL RULE: Laws take effect 15 days following the completion of its publication
EXCEPTION: Unless otherwise provided by the law. This refers to the 15 day period and NOT to the
requirement of publication. (Tanada vs. Tuvera)
NOTE: Administrative rules and regulations must also be published if their purpose is to enforce or
implement existing laws pursuant to a valid delegation. The publication must be in full since its
purpose is to inform the public of the contents of the law. (Phil. Int’l Trading Corp. vs. Angeles)
Non-retroactivity of laws
EXCEPTIONS: (UCIPELT)
2. Curative statutes
3. Interpretative statutes
4. Procedural/remedial
5. Emergency laws
7. Tax laws
GENERAL RULE: Acts which are contrary to mandatory or prohibitory laws are void.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. When the law itself authorized its validity (ex. lotto, sweepstakes)
2. When the law makes the act only voidable and not void (ex. voidable contracts where
consent is vitiated)
3. When the law makes the act valid but punishes the violator (ex. marriage solemnized by a
person without legal authority)
Waiver of rights
Requisites: (EKI)
1. Existence of a right
EXCEPTIONS:
1. If the waiver is contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals or good customs
(LPPMG)
NOTE: A stipulation requiring the recipient of a scholarship grant to waive his right to transfer to
another school, unless he refunds the equivalent of his scholarship in cash is null and void. The school
concerned obviously understands scholarship awards as a business scheme designed to increase the
business potential of an educational institution. Thus, conceived, it is not only inconsistent with sound
policy, but also with good morals. (Cui vs. Arellano University)
Laws applicable
laws of the Philippines will govern upon ALL those who live or sojourn in it
2. Laws relating to family rights and duties, or to the status, condition and legal capacity of
persons
laws of the Philippines will govern its citizens, regardless of their residence
EXCEPTION: When a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a
divorce is thereafter validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry,
the Filipino spouse shall likewise have the capacity to remarry under Philippine law. ( Article 26(2)
Family Code)
NOTE: domiciliary rule supplants the nationality rule in cases involving stateless persons
3. Laws on property
real property, as well as personal property is subject to the law of the country where it is
situated
Law >
Effectivity of laws
GENERAL RULE: Laws take effect 15 days following the completion of its publication
EXCEPTION: Unless otherwise provided by the law. This refers to the 15 day period and NOT to the requirement of p
(Tanada vs. Tuvera)
NOTE: Administrative rules and regulations must also be published if their purpose is to enforce or implement ex
pursuant to a valid delegation. The publication must be in full since its purpose is to inform the public of the cont
law. (Phil. Int’l Trading Corp. vs. Angeles)
considered a CONCLUSIVE presumption and applies only to mandatory and prohibitory laws. (Consunji vs. CA)
Non-retroactivity of laws
EXCEPTIONS: (UCIPELT)
2. Curative statutes
3. Interpretative statutes
4. Procedural/remedial
5. Emergency laws
7. Tax laws
GENERAL RULE: Acts which are contrary to mandatory or prohibitory laws are void.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. When the law itself authorized its validity (ex. lotto, sweepstakes)
2. When the law makes the act only voidable and not void (ex. voidable contracts where consent is vitiated)
3. When the law makes the act valid but punishes the violator (ex. marriage solemnized by a person w
authority)
Waiver of rights
Requisites: (EKI)
1. Existence of a right
EXCEPTIONS:
1. If the waiver is contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals or good customs (LPPMG)
NOTE: A stipulation requiring the recipient of a scholarship grant to waive his right to transfer to another school
refunds the equivalent of his scholarship in cash is null and void. The school concerned obviously understands scholar
as a business scheme designed to increase the business potential of an educational institution. Thus, conceived, it
inconsistent with sound policy, but also with good morals. (Cui vs. Arellano University)
Laws applicable
laws of the Philippines will govern upon ALL those who live or sojourn in it
2. Laws relating to family rights and duties, or to the status, condition and legal capacity of persons
laws of the Philippines will govern its citizens, regardless of their residence
EXCEPTION: When a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a divorce is therea
obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse shall likewise have the
remarry under Philippine law. (Article 26(2) Family Code)
NOTE: domiciliary rule supplants the nationality rule in cases involving stateless persons
3. Laws on property
real property, as well as personal property is subject to the law of the country where it is situated
NATIONALITY
DOMICILIARY RULE
RULE
Basis for basis for
determining determining
personal law of an personal law of an
individual is individual is
his domicile his citizenship
Renvoi Doctrine
Where the conflict rules of the forum refer to a foreign law, and the latter refers it back to the intern
latter (law of the forum) shall apply.
NOTE: If the foreign law refers it to a third country, the said country’s laws shall govern, and is referred to as the t
theory.
The foreign law, whenever applicable, should be proved by the proponent thereof; otherwise, such la
presumed to be exactly the same as the law of the forum.
GENERAL RULE: Prohibitive laws concerning persons, their acts or property and laws which have for their object p
public policy or good customs are not rendered
Human Relations
Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act
with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith. (Art. 19 of NCC)
NOTE: The elements of an abuse of right under Art. 19 are:
3. For the sole intent of prejudicing or injuring another. (Albenson Ent. Corp. vs. CA)
The SC in Velayo vs. Shell held the defendant liable under Art. 19 for disposing of its property (a
perfectly legal act) in order to escape the reach of a creditor. Likewise, in Globe Mackay Cable and
Radio Corp.
vs. CA, the employer corporation was held liable for damages for an abusive manner in dismissing an
employee, as well as for the inhuman treatment the latter got from them.
Every person who, contrary to law, willfully or negligently causes damage to another, shall
indemnify the latter for the same. (Art. 20 of NCC)
Any person who willfully causes loss or injury to another in a manner that is contrary to
morals, good customs or public policy shall compensate the latter for the damage. (ART. 21 of
NCC)
NOTE: Art. 21 deals with acts contra bonus mores, and has the following elements:
Arts. 19, 20 and 21 are related to each other and, under these articles, an act which
causes injury to another may be made the basis for an award of damages.
There is a common element under Arts. 19 and 21, and that is, the act must be done intentional.
However, Art. 20 does not distinguish, the act may be done either “willfully” or
“negligently.” (Albenson Ent. Corp. vs. CA)
The SC in Pe vs. Pe, applying Art. 21 ruled that a married man had seduced a girl through an
ingenious and tricky scheme, i.e. on the pretext of teaching her how to pray the rosary, to the extent
of making her fall in love with him. Verily, he has committed an injury to the girl’s family in a manner
contrary to morals, good customs and public policy.
However, in Tanjanco vs. CA, the SC denied the award of moral damages based on the fact that
for one year, from 1958-1959, the plaintiff, a woman of adult age, maintained intimate sexual relations
with defendant, with repeated acts of intercourse. Such conduct is incompatible with the idea of
seduction. Plainly, there is here voluntariness and mutual passion; for had the plaintiff been deceived,
had she surrendered exclusively because of the deceit, artful persuasions and wiles of defendant, she
would not have again yielded to his embraces, much less for one year without exacting early fulfillment
of the alleged promises of marriage and would have cut short all sexual relations upon finding that
defendant did not intend to fulfill his promises. Hence, no case is made under Art. 21 of Civil Code.
While a breach of promise to marry is not actionable, it has been held that to formally set a
wedding and go through and spend for all the wedding preparation and publicity, only to walk out of it
when the matrimony was about to be solemnized is a different matter. This palpably and unjustifiably
contrary to good customs for which the defendant must be held answerable for damages in accordance
with Art. 21 of the Civil Code. (Wassmer vs. Velez)
The obligation of cohabitation of husband and wife is not enforceable by contempt proceedings. In
private relations, physical coercion is barred under the the old maxim – “Nemo potest preciso cogi ad
factum.” However, the refusal of the wife to perform her wifely duties, her denial of consortium and
her desertion of her husband would certainly constitute a willful infliction of injury upon her husband’s
feelings in a manner which is contrary to morals, good customs and public policy for which Arts. 21 and
2210 (10) of the CC authorize an award for moral damages. (Tenchavez vs. Escano)
Prejudicial Question
GENERAL RULE: If both criminal and civil cases are filed in court, the criminal case takes precedence.
EXCEPTION: When there is a prejudicial question or a question that arises in a case, the resolution of
which is a logical antecedent of the issue involved herein, and the cognizance of which pertains to
another tribunal.
a. Previously instituted civil action involves an issue similar or intimately related to the issue
raised in the subsequent criminal action, and
b. The resolution of such issue determines whether or not the criminal action may proceed
PERSONS
CIVIL PERSONALITY
THEORY OF THEORY OF
GENERAL
CAPACITIES SPECIAL
CAPACITIES
Applies to Applies to juridical
natural persons persons
One has the This limits the power
ability to do all of juridical persons
things with legal only to those that are
effects except expressly conferred
only in those upon them or those
specific circum- which can be implied
stances where therefrom or
the capacity to incidental thereto
act is restrained
Natural persons
GENERAL RULE: Birth determines personality.
EXCEPTION: The law considers the conceived child as born for all purposes favorable to it if born
alive. Therefore, the child has a presumed personality, which has two characteristics:
1. limited; and
NOTES:
The presumption as to the child’s personality applies only in cases beneficial to the child.
The concept of provisional personality CANNOT be invoked to obtain damages for and in behalf
of an aborted child. (Geluz vs. CA)
GENERAL RULE: For civil purposes, the fetus is considered born if it is alive at the time it is
completely delivered from the mother’s womb.
EXCEPTION: If the fetus had an intrauterine life of less than 7 months, it is not deemed born if it
dies within 24 hours after its complete delivery from the maternal womb.
Presumption of survivorship
Two or more persons, called to succeed each other, shall be presumed to have died at the
same time, subject to the following conditions:
NOTE: Article 43 applies when the parties are called to succeed each other. But if the parties are not
called to succeed each other, Rule 131, Sec. 3 (jj) of the Rules of Court applies. Both are to be
applied only in the absence of facts.
Juridical persons
WHO:
1. State and its political subdivisions
2. Corporations, institutions and entities for public purpose or interest
3. Corporations, partnership and associations for private interest
HOW CREATED: For (a) and (b), by the laws creating or recognizing them; private corporations are
governed by BP 68 and partnership and associations are governed by the provisions of this Code
concerning partnerships.
The estate of a deceased person should be considered an artificial or juridical person for the
purposes of the settlement and distribution of his estate which, of course, include the exercise during
the judicial administration thereof of those rights and the fulfillment of those obligations of his which
survived after his death. (Limjoco vs. Intestate Estate of Pedro Fragrante)
RESIDENCE DOMICILE
Used to indicate a denotes a FIXED
PLACE OF ABODE, PERMANENT
whether RESIDENCE, which
permanent or when absent, one
temporary has the intention of
returning
There can be There can only be
several places of ONE place of
residence domicile
Elements of Domicile
Kinds of Domicile
II. FAMILY CODE
MARRIAGE
A special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in accordance
with law for the establishment of conjugal and family life. Its nature, consequences and incidents
are fixed by law and cannot be the subject of stipulation.
1. Legal capacity of the contracting parties, who must be a male and a female
2. Valid Marriage License
3. Marriage ceremony where the contracting parties appear before the solemnizing officer, with
their personal declaration that the take each other as husband and wife in the presence of not less
than two witnesses of legal age
Effects:
The is marriage voidable
Does NOT affect the validity of the marriage BUT will hold the party responsible for such
irregularity liable
3. members of the judiciary
EXCEPTIONS:
3. marriage at a house or place designated by the parties with the written request to the
solemnizing officer
2. solemnized outside the Phil. where NO marriage license is required by the country where they
were solemnized
3. of a man and a woman who have lived together as husband and wife for at least 5 years and
without legal impediment to marry each other
NOTE: The 5-year period should be computed on the basis of a cohabitation as husband and wife
where the only missing factor is the marriage contract to validate the union. This 5-year period
should be the years immediately before the day of the marriage and it should be a period of
cohabitation characterized by exclusivity - meaning no third party was involved at any time within
the 5 years and continuity - that is unbroken (Ninal vs. Bayadog, GR No. 133778 March 14, 2000).
NOTE: In the case of Manzano vs. Sanchez (G.R. No. MTJ-00-1329, March 08, 2001), the Supreme
Court laid down the requisites to avail the exemption under Article 34 of the Family Code:
a. The man and woman must have been living together as husband and wife for at least five
years before the marriage;
b. The parties must have no legal impediment to marry each other;
c. The fact of absence of legal impediment between the parties must be present at the time
of marriage;
d. The parties must execute an affidavit stating that they have lived together for at least five
years [and are without legal impediment to marry each other; and
e. The solemnizing officer must execute a sworn statement that he had ascertained the
qualifications of the parties and that he had found no legal impediment to their marriage
4. in articulo mortis
5. in remote places
NOTE: A marriage license is valid only for 120 days from date of issue, in any part of the Philippines.
Foreign Marriages
Validity of marriage:
GENERAL RULE: Where one or both parties to the marriage are citizens of the Philippines, the foreign
marriage is valid in this country if solemnized in accordance with the laws of the country of
celebration.
6. incestuous
Validity of divorce:
GENERAL RULE: A divorce validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse, capacitating him/her to
remarry can allow the Filipino to remarry.
EXCEPTION: The rule will not apply if the divorce was obtained by the Filipino spouse.
NOTE: A Filipino wife remains the lawful wife of the Filipino husband despite a decree of divorce
obtained abroad by the wife. However, if the wife is already a foreigner at the time of the divorce, she
ceases to be the lawful wife of the Filipino husband. This, notwithstanding, if at the time of the
marriage the wife was still a Filipino, and subsequently acquires citizenship of another country,
thereby rendering her to have the legal capacity to obtain a decree of divorce, the Filipino
husband remains a spouse of the former. This situation is not covered by Art. 26, par.2 which requires
that, at the time of the marriage, one of the parties is already an alien.
VOID MARRIAGES
2. solemnized by any person not legally authorized to perform marriages unless one or both of the
parties believed in good faith that the solemnizing officer had the legal authority to do so
5. marriages contracted through mistake of one of the parties as to the identity of the other
6. subsequent marriages that are void under Article 53 of the Family Code
7. contracted by a party who at the time of the marriage was psychologically incapacitated
5. between the surviving spouse of the adopting parent & the adopted child
9. between parties where one, with the intention to marry the other, killed the latter’s spouse, or
his/her spouse.
NOTE: Under the FC, the following can now marry each other:
3. where the spouse was presumed dead, and both the present spouse and would-be spouse were
in bad faith in contracting marriage (Article 44)
NOTE: Where there was failure to record in the civil registry and registry of property the judgment of
annulment or of absolute nullity of the marriage, partition and distribution of the property of the
spouses and the delivery of the children’s presumptive legitimes it shall not affect third persons
(Articles 52-53).
NOTE: Even if a marriage is void, it must be declared void first because the parties cannot decide for
themselves the invalidity of their marriage.
VOID VOIDABLE
Decree of nullity Decree of
annulment
Never be ratified Ratified by free
cohabitation
Attacked directly or Attacked directly
collaterally only
Co-ownership Conjugal
Partnership
Always void Valid until annulled
Action for Action prescribes
declaration of
nullity
does not prescribe
Psychological Incapacity
no exact definition but is restricted to psychological incapacity “to comply with the essential
marital obligations of marriage”
involves a senseless, protracted and constant refusal to comply with the essential marital
obligations by one or both of the spouses although he, she or they are physically capable of
performing such obligations (Chi Ming Tsoi vs. CA)
Essential elements: (MAVFFCCI)
a. Mental condition
6. marital obligations refer to Art. 68-71 of FC as well as Art. 220,221 and 225 of the FC
7. interpretations of the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal of the Catholic Church of the
Philippines while not controlling should be given great respect.
8. trial court must order the prosecuting attorney or fiscal and the Solicitor General to appear for
the state.
The absolute nullity of a previous marriage may be invoked for purposes of remarriage on
the basis solely of a final judgment declaring such previous marriage void.
NOTES:
For purposes of remarriage, the only legally acceptable basis for declaring a previous marriage an
absolute nullity is a final judgment declaring such previous marriage void, whereas, for purposes
other than remarriage, other evidence is acceptable. (Domingo vs. CA)
In a case for concubinage, the accused need not present a final judgment declaring his marriage
void for he can adduce evidence in the criminal case of the nullity of his marriage other than proof
of a final judgment declaring his marriage void. Hence, the pendency of the civil action for nullity
of marriage does not pose a prejudicial question in a criminal case for concubinage.
Parties to the marriage should not be permitted to judge for themselves its nullity, for the same
must be submitted to the judgment of the competent courts and only when the nullity of the
marriage is so declared can it be held as void, and so long as there is no such declaration, the
presumption is that the marriage exists for all intents and purposes. Therefore, he who cohabits
with a woman not his wife, before the judicial declaration of nullity of the marriage, assumes the
risk of being prosecuted for concubinage. (Beltran vs. People, June 20, 2000)
BIGAMOUS MARRIAGES
GENERAL RULE: A marriage contracted by any person during the subsistence of a previous valid
marriage shall be null and void.(Gomez vs. Lipana)
EXCEPTIONS: When the following conditions concur, the subsequent bigamous marriage shall be
valid:
1. absence of the other spouse must have been for four consecutive years, or two years where
there was danger of death
2. well-founded belief of the present spouse that absent spouse was already dead
1. Children of the subsequent marriage conceived prior to its termination shall be considered
legitimate;
b. if none, in favor of the children of the guilty spouse by previous marriage; or
4. The innocent spouse may revoke the designation of the spouse in bad faith as the beneficiary in
any insurance policy; and
5. The spouse who contracted the subsequent marriage in bad faith shall be disqualified to inherit
from the innocent spouse by testate or intestate succession.
NOTE: The above effects apply in voidable bigamous marriages. Except for (1), the above effects also
apply to marriages which are annulled or declared void ab initio under Art. 40 of the Code.
Requisites: (MR-BF)
1. That the absentee spouse has been missing for 4 consecutive years or 2 consecutive years if the
disappearance occurred where there is danger of death under circumstances laid down in Art.391
of the NCC
4. The present spouse files a summary proceeding for the declaration of presumptive death.
NOTE: The present spouse must establish that he had a well-founded belief required by law that his
absent wife was already dead that would sustain the issuance of a court order declaring presumptive
death. In the case of RP vs. Nolasco, The SC believed that respondent Nolasco failed to conduct a
search for his missing wife with such diligence as to give rise to a “well-founded belief” that she is
dead. When he arrived in San Jose, Antique after learning of his wife’s departure, instead of seeking
the help of local authorities or of the British embassy, he secured another seaman’s contract and went
to London, a vast city of many millions of inhabitants, to look for her there. (RP vs. Nolasco)
GENERAL RULE: The subsequent bigamous marriage under Article 41 remains valid despite
reappearance of the absentee spouse.
EXCEPTION: If the reappearance was made in a sworn statement recorded in the civil registry, the
subsequent marriage is “automatically terminated.”
EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION: If there was a previous judgment annulling or declaring the first
marriage a nullity, the subsequent bigamous marriage remains valid.
VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
Grounds: (UP-FAVS)
1. Age of the party in whose behalf it is sought to have the marriage annulled was 18 years of age
or over but below 21, and the marriage was solemnized without the consent of the parents,
guardian or person exercising substitute parental authority over the party, in that order, and both
lived together as husband and wife;
5. Physical incapability of either party to consummate the marriage with the other, and such
incapacity continues and appears to be incurable
NOTE: Mode of ratification for Nos. 1-4 is COHABITATION. In Nos. 5 & 6, there is no ratification to
speak of since the defect is permanent. The latter can be convalidated only by prescription, i.e. 5
years from the date of marriage. Specifically, in no.5, the healthy spouse may still annul the marriage
within 5yrs. after celebration.
1. Non-disclosure of a previous conviction by final judgment of the other party of a crime involving
moral turpitude;
2. Concealment by the wife of the fact that at the time of the marriage, she was Pregnant by a
man other than her husband;
3. Concealment of a Sexually transmissible disease, regardless of its nature, existing at the time
of the marriage; and
NOTES:
Misrepresentation as to character, health, rank, fortune or chastity is not a ground for
annulment.
2. Fraud Injured party w/in 5 years
from the dis-
covery of
fraud
3. incapabi- Injured party w/in 5 years
lity to after the
consum- celebration
mate of the
marriage
NOTE: In Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, when cohabitation takes place after the defect ceases to exist, the
prescriptive period is rendered moot and academic. Whichever comes first may convalidate the
marriage: Cohabitation or Prescription.
c. incurable
presumption that the husband is impotent should the wife still remain a virgin after 3 years of
living together with her husband.
NOTES:
There will be collusion only if the parties had arranged to make it appear that a ground existed
or had been committed although it was not, or if the parties had connived to bring about a
matrimonial case even in the absence of grounds therefore. (Ocampo vs. Florenciano)
A grant of annulment of marriage or legal separation by default is fraught with danger of
collusion. If the defendant spouse fails to answer the complaint, the court cannot declare him or
her in default but instead, should order the prosecuting attorney to determine if collusion exists
between the parties.
However, petitioner’s vehement opposition to the annulment proceedings negates the
conclusion that collusion existed between the parties. Under these circumstances, the non-
intervention of a prosecuting attorney to assure lack of collusion between the contending parties is
not fatal to the validity of the proceedings in the trial court. (Tuason vs. CA, GR 116607, April 10,
1996)
this Rule shall govern petitions for declaration of absolute nullity of void marriages and
annulment of voidable marriages under the Family Code of the Philippines.
for a more comprehensive discussion on the procedural aspects of the Rule, please refer to
the Remedial Law Memory Aid.
LEGAL SEPARATION
Grounds: (SAMBA-LIPAD)
1. repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct directed against the petitioner, a
common child, or a child of the petitioner
2. attempt of the respondent to corrupt or induce the petitioner, a common child, or a child of
the petitioner, to engage in prostitution, or connivance in such corruption or inducement
4. final judgment sentencing the respondent to imprisonment of more than 6 years even if
pardoned
7. abandonment of the petitioner by the respondent without justifiable cause for more than 1
year
NOTES:
Cooling-off Period – 6 months period designed to give the parties enough time to further
contemplate their positions with the end in view of attaining reconciliation between them.
The enumeration in Article 55 regarding legal separation is EXCLUSIVE. (Lacson vs. San Jose-
Lacson)
(CCCC-MP-DR)
a. Condonation -NOTE: failure of the husband to look for his adulterous wife is NOT condonation to
wife's adultery. (Ocampo vs. Florenciano)
b. Consent
c. Connivance
d. Collusion
e. Mutual Guilt
f. Prescription
g. Death of either party during the pendency of the case (Lapuz-Sy vs. Eufemio)
Effects of filing petition:
b. The husband shall have no more right to have sexual intercourse with his wife.
c. In the absence of an agreement between the parties, the court shall designate the husband,
the wife, or a 3rd person to manage the absolute community or conjugal partnership property.
a. The spouses shall be entitled to live separately from each other but the marriage bond is not
severed.
c. The custody of the minor children shall be awarded to the innocent spouse subject to the
provisions of Art. 213 of the Code.
d. The offending spouse shall be disqualified from inheriting from the innocent spouse by intestate
succession and the provisions in favor of the offending spouse made in the will of the innocent
spouse shall be revoked by operation of law.
e. The innocent spouse may revoke the donations made by him/her in favor of the offending
spouse, as well as the designation of the latter as beneficiary in any insurance policy, even if the
designation be irrevocable.
a. The legal separation proceedings, if still pending, shall thereby be terminated at whatever
stage.
b. The final decree of legal separation shall be set aside, but the separation of property and any
forfeiture of share of the guilty spouse already effected shall subsist, unless the spouses agree to
revive their former property regime.
(A.M. 02-11-11-SC)
this Rule shall govern petitions for legal separation under the Family Code in the Philippines; the
Rules of Court shall apply suppletorily
please refer to the Remedial Law Memory Aid for the procedural provisions of the Rule
(JL-FORM)
1. live together
Exercise of Profession
GENERAL RULE: Husband & wife can engage in any lawful enterprise or profession without the
consent of the other.
EXCEPTION: Upon objection of the other spouse only on valid, serious and moral grounds, may the
former’s consent be necessary.
Governed by:
MARRIAGE SETTLEMENTS
It is a contract entered into by the future spouses fixing the matrimonial property regime that
should govern during the existence.
Requisites:
6. additional signatories
1. 18-21: parents
2. civil interdictees & disabled: guardian
3. contrary stipulation
Requisites: (COBB)
2. in consideration of marriage
EXCEPTIONS:
NOTE: This rule also applies to common-law spouses. (Article 87, Family Code)
The property regime of the spouses in the absence of a marriage settlement or when the
marriage is void. This is so because it is more in keeping with Filipino culture.
GENERAL RULE: Community property shall consist of all property owned by the spouses at the time of
the marriage or acquired thereafter.
EXCEPTIONS: (BEG)
1. property acquired before the marriage by either spouse who has legitimate descendants by
a former marriage
3. property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous title, except when the donor, testator
or grantor expressly provides otherwise
NOTE: No waiver of rights allowed during the marriage except in case of judicial separation of
property. The waiver must be in a public instrument.
EXCEPTIONS:
2. In case one spouse is incapacitated or unable to participate in the administration of the
common properties, other spouse may assume sole powers.
a. Disposition
b. encumbrance
Rule on Game of Chance
LOSS: Shall be borne by the loser-spouse and shall not be charged to the community property
1. Inventory
It is that formed by a husband and wife whereby they place in a common fund the fruits of their
separate property, and the income from their work or industry, the same to be divided between
them equally (as a general rule) upon the dissolution of the marriage or the partnership.
2. acquired by chance
5. acquired through occupation
3. acquired by right of redemption, barter or exchange with property belonging to either spouse
1. Reverse Accession – if the cost of the improvement and the plus value is more than the value of
the principal property at the time of the improvement, the property becomes conjugal
2. Accession – if the cost of the improvement of the plus value is equal to or less than the value of
the principal property at the time of the improvement, the entire property becomes the exclusive
property of the spouse.
NOTE: Property bought on installments paid partly from exclusive funds of the spouses and partly form
conjugal funds:
1. If full ownership was vested before the marriage – it shall belong to the buyer-spouse
2. If full ownership was vested during the marriage - it shall belong to the conjugal partnership
3. Debts and obligations without marital consent provided the family was benefited;
4. All taxes, liens, charges and expenses including major or minor repairs upon the community or
conjugal property;
5. All taxes and expenses for mere preservation made during the marriage upon the exclusive
property of either spouse used by the family;
7. Ante-nuptial debts of either spouse insofar as they have redounded to the benefit of the family;
8. The value of what is donated or promised by both spouses in favor of their common legitimate
children for education or self-improvement; and
NOTES:
The separate properties shall be solidarily and subsidiarily liable for the obligations if the
community or conjugal properties are insufficient.
The absolute community property shall also be liable for ante-nuptial debts mentioned above,
support of illegitimate children, and liabilities incurred by either spouse by reason of a crime or
quasi-delict in case of insolvency of the exclusive property of the debtor-spouse. Payment of which
shall be advanced by the absolute community property, subject to deduction from the share of the
debtor-spouse.
The conjugal partnership property shall likewise be liable for the payment of the personal debts
of either spouse insofar as they have redounded to the benefit of the family.
Indirect benefits that might accrue to a husband in his signing a surety or guarantee agreement
not in favor of the family but in favor of his employer corporation are not the benefits that can be
considered as giving a direct advantage accruing to the family. Hence, the creditors cannot go
against the conjugal partnership property of the husband in satisfying the obligation subject of the
surety agreement. A contrary view would put in peril the conjugal partnership property by allowing
it to be given gratuitously as in cases of donation of conjugal partnership property, which is
prohibited. (Ayala Investment Corp. vs. CA)
4. judicial separation of property
Causes: (CLAAPS)
a. petitioner’s spouse has been sentenced with a penalty which carries with it civil interdiction;
d. abandonment by the petitioner’s spouse and failure to comply with the obligations to the
family;
f. at the time of the petition, spouses are separated in fact for at least 1 year and the possibility
for reconciliation is highly improbable.
NOTE: The spouses contribute to the family expenses proportionately with their income and the value
of their properties. However, the liability of the spouses to the creditors for family expenses
is solidary.
PROPERTY REGIME OF UNIONS WITHOUT MARRIAGE
2. Void marriages
3. Bigamous or
due to absence of
polygamous
formal requisite
marriages
4. Incestuous
void marriages
under Art. 37
5. Void
marriages by
reason of
public policy
under Art. 38
Salaries & Owned in equal Separately
Wages shares owned by the
parties
Property Belongs to Belongs to
Acquired such party
Exclusively such party
by Either provided
Party
there is proof
that he/she
acquired it by
exclusive
funds
Property Governed by the Owned by
Acquired rules on co- them in
by Both ownership common in
Parties proportion to
their
respective
contributions
Presump- Presumption of joint No
tion acquisition and equal presumption of
(prima sharing as to joint
facie) property acquired acquisition.
while they live When there is
together. evidence of
joint
acquisition but
none as to
the extent of
actual
contribution,
there is a
presumption of
equal sharing.
Forfeitur When only one of If one of the
e the parties is in good parties is
faith, the share of validly married
the party in bad to another,
faith in the co- his/her share
ownership shall be in the co-
forfeited: ownership
shall accrue to
a. in favor of their the absolute
common children; or community or
conjugal
partnership
b. in default of or in existing in
case such valid
marriage.
If the party
who acted in
of waiver by any or bad faith is
all of the common not validly
children or their married to
descendants, in another or if
favor of the innocent both parties
party. are in bad
faith, such
share shall be
forfeited in
the manner
provided in
the last
paragraph of
Article 147.
NOTE: Under Art. 148, only the properties acquired by both of the parties through their actual joint
contribution of money, property or industry shall be owned by them in proportion to their respective
contributions. It must be stressed that actual contribution is required by this provision, in contrast to
Art. 147 which state that efforts in the care and maintenance of the family and household, are
regarded as contributions to the acquisition of common property by one who has no salary or income
or work or industry. If the actual contribution of the party is not proved, there will be no co-
ownership and no presumption of equal shares. (Agapay vs. Palang). Hence, mere cohabitation
without proof of contribution will not result in a co-ownership. (Tumlos vs. Fernandez).
THE FAMILY
Basic social institution which public policy cherishes and protect hence, no suit between
members of the family shall prosper unless the compromise between the parties have failed
FAMILY HOME
GENERAL RULE: The family home is exempt from execution, forced sale or attachment.
EXCEPTIONS: (PLMN)
Guidelines:
3. must be permanent
4. rule applies to valid and voidable and even to common-law spouses under Articles 147 and 148
5. continues despite death of one or more spouses or unmarried head of the family for 10 years, or
as long as a minor beneficiary lives
Status is legitimate child, provided both husband and wife authorized or ratified the
insemination in a written instrument which they executed and signed before the birth of the child
Legitimate Children
GENERAL RULE: Only those who are conceived or born during a valid marriage
EXCEPTIONS: (CAVALAC)
3. Conceived or born before judgment of annulment or absolute nullity under Art. 36 has
become final & executory
5. Of mothers who may have declared against its legitimacy or was sentenced as an adultress
6. Legally adopted
7. Legitimated, conceived and born outside of wedlock of parents without impediment at the
time of conception and had subsequently married
Illegitimate Children
GENERAL RULE: Those conceived and born outside a valid marriage are illegitimate.
1. born of marriages which are void ab initio such as bigamous and incestuous marriages and
marriage was declared void for being contrary to law and public policy
1. physical impossibility of the husband to have sexual intercourse with his wife within the 1 st 120
days of the 300 days immediately preceding the child’s birth, due to:
2. biological or scientific proof that the child could not have been that of the husband; and
1. one year, from knowledge of birth or recording in the civil register, if husband or heirs lives in
the SAME city/municipality
C. Parties
EXCEPTION: The heirs, if the husband dies before the end of the prescription of the action, or after
filing complaint, or child was born after death
NOTE: The question of legitimacy cannot be collaterally attacked, it can be impugned only in a direct
action.
Rule on the Status of Children born after 300 days following Termination of Marriage
A. Requisites (TS-WBN)
1. first marriage terminated
4. child was born
1. to first marriage, if child was born before the lapse of 180 days after celebration of
2nd marriage provided born within 300 days after termination of the 1 st marriage.
2. to second marriage, if child was born after 180 days following celebration of 2 nd marriage
whether born within 300 days after termination of 1st marriage or afterwards.
Proof of Filiation
GENERAL RULE: Filiation of legitimate (or illegitimate) children is established by any of the following:
EXCEPTION: In the absence of any of the foregoing evidence, such legitimate or illegitimate filiation
shall be proved by:
2. Any other means allowed by the Rules of Court and special laws.
NOTES:
Continuous does not mean that the concession of status shall continue forever but only that it
shall not be of an intermittent character while it is continuous. The possession of such status
means that the father has treated the child as his own, directly and not through others,
spontaneously and without concealment though without publicity. There must be a showing of
permanent intention of the supposed father to consider the child as his own by continuous and
clear manifestation of paternal affection and care. (Mendoza vs. CA). The paternal affection and
care must not be attributed to pure charity. “Such acts must be of such a nature that they reveal
not only the conviction of paternity, but also the apparent desire to have and treat the child as
such in all relations in society and in life, not accidentally, but continuously.” (Jison vs. CA)
The SC in Lim vs. CA, ruled that petitioner was the father of his illegitimate children because
the evidences convincingly show this. Hence, it was the petitioner who paid the bills for the
hospitalization of the mother when she gave birth. He was the one who caused the registration of
the name of the child using his surname in the birth certificate. He also wrote handwritten letters
to the mother and the child stating his promise “to be a loving and caring husband and father to
both of you.” There were also pictures of the petitioner on various occasions cuddling the child.
In view of the fact that filiation may be proved by “any means allowed by the Rules of Court and
special laws” this may consist of baptismal certificate, a judicial admission, a family bible in which
his name has been entered, common reputation respecting his pedigree, admission by silence, the
testimony of witnesses and such other kinds of proof admissible under Rule 130 of RC. (Mendoza vs.
CA) For a baptismal certificate to be proof of filiation under the Rules of Court, it must be shown
that the father therein participated in the preparation of the same. A birth certificate not signed
by the alleged father indicated in said certificate is not competent evidence of
paternity. (Fernandez vs. CA)
Proof of filiation of petitioners to the late Enrique Baluyut is not sufficient to confer upon them
any hereditary right in the estate of the deceased. What is necessary to be established by an
illegitimate not natural child in order that he may be entitled to successional rights under Art 887
of NCC, is not the fact of his bare filiation but a filiation acknowledged by the putative parent.
(Baluyut vs. Baluyut)
LEGITIMATE ILLEGITIMATE
Use of father & Use of mother‘s
mother’s surname surname
NOTE: However, RA
9255 amended
Article 176, FC
Receive support Receive support
from parents according to FC
Entitled to the Legitime is ½ of the
legitime & other legitime of a
successional rights legitimate child
1. their filiation has been expressly recognized by the father through the record of birth appearing
in the civil register, or
LEGITIMATION
Requisites: (NIM)
b. The parents at the time of the child’s conception are not disqualified from marrying each other
ADOPTION
1. Filipino Citizen:
a. of legal age
b. in a position to support and care for his/her children in keeping with the means of the
family
2. Alien:
c. has been living in the Phil. for at least three (3) continuous years prior to the application
for adoption and maintains such residence until the adoption decree is entered, except when
1) former Filipino citizen who seeks to adopt a relative within the 4 th degree of
consanguinity or affinity
2) one who seeks to adopt the legitimate or illegitimate child of his/her Filipino spouse
3) one who is married to a Filipino citizen and seeks to adopt jointly with his/her spouse a
relative within the 4th degree of consanguinity or affinity of the Filipino spouse
e. certified by said office that his government allows the adoptee to enter his/her country as
his/her adopted child
3. Guardian – with respect to the ward after termination of the guardianship and clearance of
his/her financial accountabilities
Pre-Adoption Services
1. counselling services for the biological parents, prospective adoptive parents and prospective
adoptee
2. exhaust all efforts to locate the biological parents, if unkown
EXCEPTIONS:
2. legitimate stepchild
3. illegitimate stepchild
4. qualified adult, who, prior to the adoption, has been consistently considered by the adopter as
his/her own child since minority;
6. child whose biological or adoptive parents have died, provided that no proceedings shall be
initiated within 6 months from the time of death of said parents
Consent in Adoption (BAILAS)
4. the illegitimate children, 10 years old or over, of the adopter if living with the adopter and the
latter's spouse
a decree of adoption shall be effective as of the date the original petition was filed. It applies also
in case the petitioner(s) dies before the issuance of the decree of adoption to protect the interest of
the adoptee.
NOTE: Where the petition for adoption was granted after the child had shot and killed a girl, the SC did
not consider the retroactive effect to the decree of adoption so as to impose a liability upon the
adopting parents accruing at the time when the adopting parents had no actual or physical custody
over the adopted child. Retroactive effect may perhaps be given to the granting of the petition for
adoption where such is essential to permit the accrual of some benefit or advantage in favor of the
adopted child. To hold that parental authority had been retroactively lodged in the adopting parents so
as to burden them with liability for a tortious act that they could not have foreseen and which they
could have prevented would be unfair and unconscionable. (Tamargo vs. CA 209 S 518)
Effects of Adoption: (SAL)
1. Severance of legal ties between the biological parents and the adoptee and the same shall be
vested in the adopters.
2. Adoptee shall be considered as a legitimate child of the adopter(s) for all intents and purposes.
3. In legal or intestate succession, the adoptee and the adopter(s) shall have reciprocal rights of
succession without distinction from legitimate filiation. However, if there is a will, the rules on
testamentary succession shall be followed.
Rescission of Adoption
Grounds: (ASAR)
NOTES:
Only the adoptee is given the right to rescind the decree of adoption
The adopter can NOT rescind the decree of the adoption but he or she may disinherit the adoptee.
Effects:
a. Parental authority of adoptee’s biological parents or legal custody of DSWD shall be restored if
adoptee is still a minor or incapacitated.
b. Reciprocal rights and obligations of the adopter(s) and the adoptee to each other shall
be extinguished.
c. The amended certificate of birth of the adoptee shall be cancelled and its original shall be
restored.
d. Succession rights shall revert to its status prior to the adoption, but vested rights shall not be
affected.
Inter-Country Adoption
The socio-legal process of adopting a Filipino child by a foreigner or a Filipino citizen permanently
residing abroad where the petition is filed, the supervised trial custody is undertaken, and the decree
of adoption is issued outside the Philippines.
NOTE: “Legally-free Child” - a child who has been voluntarily or involuntarily committed to the DSWD
of the Philippines, in accordance with the Child Youth and Welfare Code.
b. No child shall be matched to a foreign adoptive family unless it is satisfactorily shown that the child
cannot be adopted locally.
Any alien or Filipino citizen permanently residing abroad may file an application for inter-
country adoption of a Filipino child if he/she:
1. is at least 27 years of age and at least 16 years older than the child to be adopted, at the
time of the application unless the adopter is the parent by nature of the child to be adopted or
the spouse of such parent
3. has the capacity to act and assume all rights and responsibilities of parental authority under
his national laws, and has undergone the appropriate counselling from an accredited counsellor in
his/her country
7. agrees to uphold the basic rights of the child as embodied under Philippine laws, the U.N.
Convention on the Rights of a Child, and to abide by the rules and regulations issued to implement
the Inter-Country Adoption Act
8. comes from a country with whom the Philippines has diplomatic relations and whose
government maintains a similarly authorized and accredited agency and that adoption is allowed
under his/her national laws
9. possesses all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications under the Inter-Country
Adoption Act and other applicable Philippine laws
The Board shall ensure that all possibilities for the adoption of the child under the Family Code
have been exhausted and that inter-country adoption is in the best interest of the child.
Trial Custody:
1. starts upon actual physical transfer of the child to the applicant who, as actual custodian, shall
exercise substitute parental authority over the person of the child.
2. the adopting parent(s) shall submit to the governmental agency or authorized and accredited
agency, which shall in turn transmit a copy to the Board, a progress report of the child’s
adjustment.
NOTES:
If the pre-adoptive relationship is found unsatisfactory by the child or the applicant or both, or
if the foreign adoption agency finds that the continued placement of the child is not in the child’s
best interest, said relationship shall be suspended by the Board and the foreign adoption agency
shall arrange for the child’s temporary care.
If a satisfactory pre-adoptive relationship is formed between the applicant and the child, the
Board shall submit the written consent to the adoption to the foreign adoption agency within 30
days after receipt of the latter’s request.
A copy of the final decree of adoption of the child, including certificate of
citizenship/naturalization whenever applicable, shall be transmitted by the foreign adoption
agency to the Board within 1 month after its issuance.
NOTE: For a comprehensive discussion of the procedural aspects of adoption, please refer to A.M. No.
02-06-02-SC or the Remedial Law Memory Aid
SUPPORT
everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance, education and
transportation in keeping with the financial capacity of the family
Kinds: (LJC)
Characteristics: (PIN-ERV)
1. Personal
2. Intransmissible
5. Reciprocal on the part of those who are by law bound to support each other
6. Variable
1. spouses
4. parents and their illegitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter
NOTE: Support shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the necessities of
the recipient.
1. spouse
NOTES:
When the obligation to give support falls upon 2 or more persons payment shall be divided
between them in proportion to the resources of each, but in case of urgent need and special
circumstances, the court may order one of them to furnish the support provisionally subject to the
right to claim from the other obligors the share due them
When two or more recipients at the same time claim for support and the obligor does not have
sufficient means to satisfy all claims:
1. The father and the mother shall JOINTLY exercise parental authority over the persons of their
common children. In case of disagreement, the father’s decision shall prevail UNLESS there is a
judicial order to the contrary
2. If the child is illegitimate, parental authority is with the mother.
the natural parents, who are of good character and who can reasonably provide for the child are
ordinarily entitled to custody as against all persons
GENERAL RULE: No child under 7 years of age shall be separated from the mother.
Persons Exercising Substitute PA:
1. surviving grandparent
Persons Exercising Special PA:
1. school
NOTES:
Parental authority and responsibility are inalienable and may not be transferred and renounced
except in cases authorized by law.
ADVENTITIOUS PROFECTITIOUS
1. earned or acquired 1. property given by
by the child through the parents to the
his work or industry by child for the latter to
onerous or gratuitous administer
title
2. owned by the child 2. owned by the
parents
3. child is also the 3. parents are the
usufructuary, but the usufructuary
child’s use of the
property shall be
secondary to the
collective daily needs
of the family
4. property 4. property
administered by the administered by the
parents child
Termination of PA
PERMANENT TEMPORARY
1. death of the 1. adoption of the
parents child
3. emancipation of 3. judicial
the child declaration of
abandonment
4. subjected child
to sexual abuse 4. final judgment
divesting the
parents of parental
authority
5. judicial
declaration of
absence or inca-
pacity of the
parents exercising
parental authority
over the child
3. orders, counsel and example which are corrupting, given by the person exercising authority
5. acts of lasciviousness, allowed for the child to be subjected to, or himself subjects the child to
FUNERALS
GENERAL GUIDELINES
1. duty and right to make arrangement in funerals in accordance with Article 199, FC
2. the funeral shall be in keeping with the social position of the deceased
3. the funeral shall be in accordance with the expressed wishes of the deceased
a. in the absence of the expressed wishes, his religious beliefs or affiliation shall determine
4. any person who disrepects the dead or allows the same shall be liable for damages
Grounds for Change of First Name or Nickname under R.A. No. 9048 (An act authorizing City or
Municipal Civil Registrar or the Consul General to Correct a Clerical or Typographical Error in an Entry
and/or Change of First Name or Nickname in the Civil Registrar Without need of a Judicial Order,
Amending for this Purpose Articles 376 and 412 of the Civil Code))
1. The petitioner finds the first name or nickname to be ridiculous, tainted with dishonour or
extremely difficult to write or pronounce
2. The new first name or nickname has been habitually and continuously used by the petitioner
and he has been publicly known by that first name or nickname in the community
NOTE: Please refer to Remedial Law Memory Aid for a comprehensive discussion of the procedural
aspects of change of name.
ABSENCE
DECLARATION OF ABSENCE
WITHOUT WITH
ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR
2 years from the 5 years from the
lapse of time without lapse of time without
news about the news about the
absentee or since the absentee or since the
receipt of the last receipt of the last
news news
PRESUMPTION OF DEATH
ORDINARY EXTRAORDINARY/
ABSENCE QUALIFIED
ABSENCE
c. person in danger of
death under other
circumstances and his
existence has not been
known