Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 31393–31399 | 31393
View Article Online
and purchased from Sinopharm (P. R. China). All chemicals reaction tube every 10 min, and centrifuged (7100 g) for 5 min
were used as received. Ultrapure water obtained from a Hitech- to remove particles. The pH values of suspensions were 7.3
Kow water purication system (Hitech, P. R. China) was used 0.2 at the beginning and increased to 7.7 0.1 aer reactions.
throughout experiments. The RhB concentration was determined using a SP-1105 visible
spectrophotometer (Spectrum, P. R. China), by measuring the
2.2. Preparation of BiOI ower-like microspheres absorbance at 554 nm. The ratio of the RhB concentration to its
initial concentration (C/C0) was obtained by calculating the
0.1 g of Bi(NO3)3$5H2O in 20 mL of ethanol was stirred for ratio of the corresponding absorbances.
15 min, and the pH of the Bi(NO3)3 precursor was 1.42. 0.076 g
of TBAI in 20 mL of water was added dropwise under stirring.
The color of the suspension gradually changed from yellow to 3. Results and discussion
red, and the pH of the system changed to 2.13. Aer stirring for 3.1. XRD analysis
20 min, the mixture was transferred to an 80 mL polytetra-
Fig. 1 shows XRD patterns of the BiOI samples prepared at
uoroethylene-lined stainless steel autoclave, and heated to TH
different TH and tH. Retaining TH at 160 C while varying tH from
for different tH. The product was collected by ltration, washed
6 to 48 h, resulted in all samples exhibiting the characteristic
thoroughly with water, and dried at 60 C for 12 h. The prepared
peaks of highly crystalline BiOI (Fig. 1a). Peaks at 19.3, 29.6,
products were denoted as Bi-TH/tH. In addition, BiOI nanoplates
31.7, 37.1, 39.3, 45.5, 51.4, 55.2, 60.2, and 66.3 corresponded to
(denoted Bi-p) were prepared with KI as an iodine source via a
the (002), (012), (110), (013), (004), (014), (114), (212), (115), and
similar process (S1, ESI†). N-TiO2 was synthesized according to
(220) planes, respectively, and were indexed to the tetragonal
the literature35 (S2, ESI†).
phase of BiOI (JCPDS Card no. 10-0445). No peaks of impurities
were observed. Among these BiOI samples, Bi-160/30 exhibited
2.3. Characterization the highest intensity XRD peaks, suggesting it possessed the
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using a highest crystallinity. Bi-p exhibited a similar XRD pattern
D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Germany), with Cu Ka (Fig. S1, ESI†). The effect of TH was investigated at a constant tH
radiation (l ¼ 1.54184 Å). Field-emission scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images were collected using a Supra55
microscope (ZEISS, Germany). Transmission electron micros-
copy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were
collected using a Jeol JEM-2100F microscope (Japan). Specic
surface areas (SBET) were determined by measuring volumetric
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at liquid nitrogen
temperature, using an ASAP 2020 HD88 instrument (Micro-
meritics, USA). Ultraviolet-visible diffuse reectance spectra
(DRS) were recorded on a Cary 100 spectrophotometer (Agilent,
USA) with a BaSO4 reference. Dynamic light scattering (DLS)
analyses were carried out at 25 C, using a Brookhaven Model
(BI-200SM) instrument equipped with an Ar laser lamp (300 mW
at 532 nm).
31394 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 31393–31399 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
were calculated from the (012) peaks of the XRD patterns using
the Scherrer formula, and were in the range of 17.9–29.5 nm
(Fig. S2, ESI†). No obvious trend in average crystallite sizes was
observed with either TH or tH.
Fig. 3 SEM images of (a) Bi(NO3)3, (b) BiONO3, (c) Bi-25/0, (d) Bi-160/
1, (e) Bi-160/6, (f) Bi-160/12, (g) Bi-160/18, (h) Bi-160/24, (i) Bi-160/36,
(j) Bi-160/42, (k) Bi-160/48, (l) Bi-120/30, (m) Bi-140/30, and (n) Bi-
180/30.
Fig. 2 (a and b) SEM and (c and d) TEM images of (a and c) Bi-p and (b
and d) Bi-160/30. Insets show HRTEM images.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 31393–31399 | 31395
View Article Online
31396 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 31393–31399 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
compared with that of N-TiO2 and P25 TiO2. The results are
shown in Fig. 7a and b. No obvious degradation of RhB was
observed in the absence of a photocatalyst. Bi-160/30 exhibited
the highest photocatalytic efficiency among the tested catalysts.
Approximately 88% of RhB was degraded by Bi-160/30 aer
50 min.
The pseudo-rst-order kinetics model was used to t the
Fig. 6 Ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of BiOI samples.
photodegradation data, the equation for which is:
Insert shows (ahn)1/2 versus hn curves.
ln(Ct/C0) ¼ kt, (2)
160 C. The SBET of Bi-160/30 was 14.4 m2 g1, which was twice where k and t are the apparent rst-order rate constant and
more than that of Bi-p (5.5 m2 g1). irradiation time, respectively. The model tting plots and cor-
responding k values are shown in Fig. 7c and d, respectively. Bi-
3.4. Optical absorption properties 160/30 exhibited the highest k, which was 5, 7, and 20 times
The optical properties of the BiOI samples were investigated by higher than those of Bi-p, N-TiO2 and P25 TiO2, respectively.
ultraviolet-visible DRS, and are shown in Fig. 6. Bi-p and Bi-160/ The effect of pH on the photodegradation activity of Bi-160/
30 exhibited absorption edges up to 650 nm, which indicated 30 was studied (Fig. S5, ESI†). The degradation rate almost kept
a small band gap. An absorption peak at 450 nm was also constant at pH 3–7.5, but dramatically decreased at pH > 8. The
exhibited by both samples. The band gaps of crystalline semi- isoelectric point of the BiOI sample is pH 7.72. The decrease of
conductors can be calculated from their absorption spectra degradation rate at pH > 8 was probably ascribed to the
according to: decreased RhB adsorption on the surface of Bi-160/30 owing to
the high electrostatic repulsion between RhB and Bi-160/30.
ahv ¼ K(hv Eg)n/2, (1)
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 31393–31399 | 31397
View Article Online
Fig. 9 (a) XRD patterns and (b) SEM image of Bi-160/30 after three
consecutive photocatalytic degradations of RhB.
Acknowledgements
Fig. 10 Dependence of rate constant and degraded RhB percentage The present work is supported nancially by the National
on Fm. Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21173135) and the
31398 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 31393–31399 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher 24 X. Xiao and W. D. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 5866–
Education of China (no. 20110131130008). 5870.
25 B. Zhang, G. B. Ji, M. A. Gondal, Y. S. Liu, X. M. Zhang,
X. F. Chang and N. W. Li, J. Nano. Res., 2013, 15, 1–9.
References 26 J. Xia, S. Yin, H. M. Li, H. Xu, L. Xu and Q. Zhang, Colloids
Surf., A, 2011, 387, 23–28.
Published on 08 July 2014. Downloaded by State University of New York at Stony Brook on 16/09/2014 11:30:11.
1 K. Maeda, T. Takata, M. Hara, N. Saito, Y. Inoue, 27 K. Ren, K. Zhang, J. Liu, H. Luo, Y. Huang and X. Yu,
H. Kobayashi and K. Domen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 4384–4390.
8286–8287. 28 S. X. Wu, J. Z. Fang, X. T. Hong, K. S. Hui and Y. F. Chen,
2 A. Hameed, T. Montini, V. Gombac and P. Fornasiero, J. Am. Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 2611–2619.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 9658–9659. 29 J. Di, J. X. Xia, S. Yin, H. Xu, L. Xu, Y. G. Xu and H. M. Li,
3 H. Yamashita, M. Harada, J. Misaka, M. Takeuchi, K. Ikeue J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 5340–5351.
and M. Anpo, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2002, 148, 257–261. 30 N. Huang, A. Hu and M. Li, Mater. Lett., 2013, 109, 247–252.
4 E. Bae and W. Choi, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003, 37, 147–152. 31 Z. K. Cui, M. M. Si, Z. Zheng, L. W. Mi, W. J. Fa and H. M. Jia,
5 H. M. Jia, W. J. Xiao, L. Z. Zhang, Z. Zheng, H. L. Zhang and Catal. Commun., 2013, 42, 121–124.
F. Deng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 11379–11384. 32 D. K. Ma, S. M. Zhou, X. Hu, Q. R. Jiang and S. M. Huang,
6 K. Vinodgopal and P. V. Kamat, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1995, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2013, 140, 11–15.
29, 841–845. 33 J. Cao, X. Li, H. L. Lin, S. F. Chen and X. Fu, J. Hazard. Mater.,
7 T. Oncescu, M. I. Stefan and P. Oancea, Environ. Sci. Pollut. 2012, 239, 316–324.
Res., 2010, 17, 1158–1166. 34 J. Cao, B. Y. Xu, B. D. Luo, H. L. Lin and S. F. Chen, Catal.
8 M. Kong, Y. Li, X. Chen, T. Tian, P. Fang, F. Zheng and Commun., 2011, 12, 660–664.
X. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 16414–16417. 35 D. Mitoraj and H. Kisch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
9 S. G. Kumar and L. G. Devi, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2011, 115, 9975–9978.
13211–13241. 36 P. V. Ioannou, Main Group Chem., 2011, 10, 255–264.
10 Y. N. Wang, K. J. Deng and L. J. Deng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 37 A. Kay and I. Cesar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 15714–
115, 14300–14308. 15721.
11 R. Hao, X. Xiao, X. Zuo, J. Nan and W. Zhang, J. Hazard. 38 Y. Li, J. Liu, X. Huang and G. Li, Cryst. Growth Des., 2007, 7,
Mater., 2012, 209, 137–145. 1350–1355.
12 Y. Lei, G. Wang, S. Song, W. Fan and H. Zhang, 39 H. F. Cheng, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, X. Y. Qin and X. Y. Zhang,
CrystEngComm, 2009, 11, 1857–1862. Langmuir, 2010, 26, 6618–6624.
13 S. X. Ge and L. Z. Zhang, J. Nano Res., 2012, 14, 1–11. 40 H. F. Cheng, B. B. Huang and Y. Dai, Nanoscale, 2014, 6,
14 Y. Y. Li, J. S. Wang, H. C. Yao, L. Y. Dang and Z. J. Li, J. Mol. 2009–2026.
Catal. A: Chem., 2011, 334, 116–122. 41 S. X. Yang, Q. Yue, Z. H. Chen, J. H. Yang and J. B. Li, J. Alloys
15 T. B. Li, G. Chen, C. Zhou, Z. Y. Shen, R. C. Jin and J. X. Sun, Compd., 2014, 597, 91–94.
Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 6751–6758. 42 J. Xia, S. Yin, H. Li, H. Xu, Y. Yan and Q. Zhang, Langmuir,
16 L. Q. Ye, Y. R. Su, X. L. Jin, H. Q. Xie and C. Zhang, 2010, 27, 1200–1206.
Environmental Science: Nano, 2014, 1, 90–112. 43 Z. Zhang, C. C. Wang, R. Zakaria and J. Y. Ying, J. Phys. Chem.
17 L. Q. Ye, L. H. Tian, T. Y. Peng and L. Zan, J. Mater. Chem., B, 1998, 102, 10871–10878.
2011, 21, 12479–12484. 44 N. J. Huo, Q. Yue, S. X. Yang and J. B. Li, ChemPhysChem,
18 L. Ye, J. Chen, L. Tian, J. Liu, T. Peng, K. Deng and L. Zan, 2013, 14, 4069–4073.
Appl. Catal., B, 2013, 130, 1–7. 45 J. Ryu and W. Choi, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2004, 38, 2928–
19 W. L. Huang and Q. Zhu, J. Comput. Chem., 2009, 30, 183– 2933.
190. 46 L. Mohapatra, K. Parida and M. Satpathy, J. Phys. Chem. C,
20 J. Hu, S. Weng, Z. Zheng, Z. Pei, M. Huang and P. Liu, 2012, 116, 13063–13070.
J. Hazard. Mater., 2014, 264, 293–302. 47 X. Xiao, R. Hu, C. Liu, C. Xing, C. Qian, X. Zuo and L. Wang,
21 X. Chang, J. Huang, Q. Tan, M. Wang, G. Ji, S. Deng and Appl. Catal., B, 2013, 140, 433–443.
G. Yu, Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 1957–1961. 48 S. Ge and L. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45, 3027–
22 J. Jiang, X. Zhang, P. Sun and L. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 3033.
2011, 115, 20555–20564. 49 H. Lee and W. Choi, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36, 3872–
23 X. Zhang, Z. Ai, F. Jia and L. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 3878.
112, 747–753.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 31393–31399 | 31399