Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0169-4332(17)32190-6
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.190
Reference: APSUSC 36724
Please cite this article as: Jinfen Niu, Peixuan Dai, Qian Zhang, Binghua Yao, Xiaojiao
Yu, Microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of novel hierarchical BiOI/rGO
composites for efficient photocatalytic degardation of organic pollutants, Applied
Surface Sciencehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.190
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
Microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of novel hierarchical
BiOI/rGO composites for efficient photocatalytic degardation of
organic pollutants
*
Correspondence: Email: niujinfen@xaut.edu.cn (J.N.)
Graphical abstract
Highlights
The BG-2 composite has been synthesized by one-step rapid microwave
hydrothermal method.
recombination.
1
Abstract
1. Introduction
2
temperature soft-chemical process[3], BiOMxR1-x solid solutions synthesized through
a low-temperature precipitation [12], have been synthesized to enhance the
photocatalytic activity. Graphene and its derivatives have aroused numerous attention
due to its special structure and remarkable feature, such as robust but flexible
structure, outstanding electron mediator and high carrier mobility. Many researchers
have devoted themselves to enhancing the photodegradation actives of catalysts by
preparing graphene-based hybrid composites[4, 24-30].These composites can improve
the photocatalytic process of BiOI by promoting charge separation, but there are a
series of disadvantages, like long reaction time, more power consumption, difficulty
in handling the process and high temperatures[31-33]. Hence, it’s still necessary to
develop a new synthetic method to deal with these problems. Microwave irradiation
technique is a facile, rapid, time-saving, highly efficient, environmentally friendly and
economical synthetic method [13, 34-37].
In this paper, we report a simple one-step rapid microwave hydrothermal method
to prepared BG-1 and BG-2 composites with different synthesized route. The
photocatalytic performance of BG-1 and BG-2 were evaluated by photocatalytic
degradating methylene blue (40 mg/mL) and levofloxacin (20 mg/mL) under visible-
light irradiation. And this study tries to build up a relationship between the
synthesized route of BG-1 and BG-2 composites and their photocatalytic activity by
comparing the crystal structure, morphologies, optical properties, specific surface area,
electrons-holes separation effect, respectively. The obtained results may provide
important information for preparing high photocatalytic activity photocatalysts via
microwave hydrothermal method.
2. Experimental
The surface components and chemical states of BG-1 and BG-2 composites are
analyzed by XPS. The whole XPS spectrogram of the BG-1 and BG-2 composites can
be investigated in Fig. 4a. Bi, O, I and C are expectation in the samples. Fig. 4b
reveals the high-resolution XPS spectrogram of the Bi 4f. The peaks for the Bi 4f7/2
and Bi 4f5/2 are observed at 159.5 and 164.8 eV (binding energy) respectively [42],
which belong to of Bi3+ ion in BiOI compared to the standard data. As to the high-
resolution spectrogram of I 3d (Fig. 4c), two peaks with binding energy of 619.1 eV
and 630.7 are ascribed to I 3d5/2 and I 3d3/2 respectively, may be attributed to I− ion in
BG-1 and BG-2 [43].The O 1s wide peaks are fitted into two peaks associating with
the oxygen (529.4 eV, 530.4 eV) in the Bi-O bonds in [Bi2O2] of BiOX layered
structure and other components (531.3 eV,532.0 eV) like the water molecules,
hydroxyl groups on the surface of the composites [24] (Fig. 4d). The C 1s of GO (Fig.
4f) can be fitted into two peaks, which own the binding energy at 284.6 eV (C-C) and
287.0 eV (C-O). As to the BG-1 and BG-2 (Fig. 4e), the peak of C-O is significantly
weaken. Compared to the ratio of C-O and C-C, GO was higher than BG-1and BG-2,
indicating the BG-1 and BG-2 had more thermal reduction of the C-O group and
combined with rGO perfectly.
\The optical properties of the samples were studied via the UV-vis diffuse
reflectance.It could be observed in Fig. 5 that the BG-1 and BG-2 samples showed an
increased absorption in visible light range and two composite samples showed an
obvious red-shift relative to the pure BiOI sample in Fig. 5a. And the band gap
energy of them could be calculated from Kubelka-Munk equation (Fig. 5b) [5]. The
reaults are written in Table 1.
5
The porous structure and BET surface areas of the BG-1 and BG-2 composites
and pristine BiOI are investigated by N2 adsorption-desorption. As showed in Fig. 6,
the pore size distributions (Fig. 6a) of the composites exhibit broader pore size
distribution from 2 nm to 10 nm, further proving the existing of micropore. The
isotherm of BiOI and BG-1 and BG-2 composites exhibited type IV with a H3
hysteresis loop (Fig. 6b), which suggesting the presence of meso-porous in materials
[37]. Table 1 reveals the specific surface areas. It can be observed that BG-1 and BG-
2 composites have larger specific surface areas comparing to that of undoped BiOI,
that is way the BG-1 and BG-2 composites owned higher photocatalytic performance.
4. Conclusions
9
References
[1]X.X. Wei, H.T. Cui, S.Q. Guo, L.F. Zhao, W. Li, Hybrid BiOBr-TiO2
nanocomposites with high visible light photocatalytic activity for water treatment,
J. Hazard. Mater. 263 (2013) 650-658.
[2]W.X. Zou, L. Zhang, L.C. Liu, X.B. Wang, J.F. Sun, Engineering the Cu2O-
reduced graphene oxide interface to enhance photocatalytic degradation of
organic pollutants under visible light, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 181 (2016) 495-
503.
[3]X. Zhang, L.Z. Zhang, T.F. Xie, Low-temperature synthesis and high visible-
light-induced photocatalytic activity of BiOI/TiO2 heterostructures, J. Phys. Chem.
113 (2009) 7371-7378.
[4]R.A. He, S.W. Cao, D.P. Guo, B. Cheng, S. Wageh, 3D BiOI-GO composite with
enhanced photocatalytic performance for phenol degradation under visible-light,
Ceram. Int. 41 (2015) 3511-3517.
[5]H. Liu, W.R. Cao, Y. Su, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, Bismuth oxyiodide-graphene
nanocomposites with high visible light photocatalytic activity, J. Colloid Inter.
Sci. 398 (2013) 161-167.
[6]B.M. Almeida, J.M.A. Melo, J. Bettini, J.E. Benedetti, A.F. Nogueira, A novel
nanocomposite based on TiO2/Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide with enhanced
solar-light-driven photocatalytic activity, Appl. Surf. Sci. 324 (2015) 419-431.
[7]S. Vadivel, M. Vanitha, A. Muthukrishnaraj, N. Balasubramanian, Graphene
oxide-BiOBr composite material as highly efficient photocatalyst for degradation
of methylene blue and rhodamine-B dyes, J. Water Process Eng. 1 (2014) 17-26.
[8]X.J. Chen, Y.Z. Dai, X.Y. Wang, J. Guo, T.H. Liu, F.F. Li, Synthesis and
characterization of Ag3PO4 immobilized with grapheme oxide (GO) for enhanced
photocatalytic activity and stability over 2,4-dichlorophenol under visible light
irradiation, J. Hazard. Mater. 292 (2015) 9-18.
[9]J.F Niu, P.X. Dai, B.H. Yao, X.J. Yu, Q. Zhang, Preparation and application of
Fe(III) doped titania photocatalyst with hollow structure, Inte. Ferro. 167 (2015)
123-136.
[10]Z. Liu, W.C. Xu, J.Z. Fang, X.X. Xu, S.X. Wu, Decoration of BiOI quantum size
nanoparticles with reduced graphene oxide in enhanced visible-light-driven
photocatalytic studies, Appl. Surf. Sci. 259 (2012) 441-447.
[11]J.F Niu, B.H. Yao, Y.Q. Chen, P. Chao, X.J. Yu, J. Zhang, Enhanced
photocatalytic activity of nitrogen doped TiO2 photocatalysts sensitized by
metallo Co, Ni-porphyrins, Appl. Surf. Sci. 271 (2013) 39-44.
10
[12]K.X. Ren, J. Liu, J. Liang, K. Zhang, X. Zheng, H.D. Luo, Synthesis of the
bismuth oxyhalide solid solutions with tunable band gap and photocatalytic
activities, Dal. Trans. 42 (2013) 9706-9712.
[13]J.F Niu, P. Lu, M. Kang, K.F. Deng, B.H. Yao, X.J. Yu, Q. Zhang, P-doped TiO2
with superior visible-light activity prepared by rapid microwave hydrothermal
method, Appl. Surf. Sci. 319 (2014) 99-106.
[14]A.J. Cai, Y.F. Sun, L.Q. Du, X.P. Wang, Hierarchical Ag2O-ZnO-Fe3O4
composites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity, J. Alloys Compd.
644 (2015) 334-340.
[15]Y.Y. Li, J.S. Wang, B. Liu, L.Y. Dang, H.C. Yao, Z.J. Li, BiOI-sensitized TiO2 in
phenol degradation: A Novel 3D flowerlike efficient semiconductor sensitizer,
Chem. Phys. Letters. 508 (2011) 102-106.
[18]R.A. He, S.W. Cao, P. Zhou, J.G. Yu, Recent advances in visible light Bi-based
photocatalysts, Chinese. J. Catal. 35 (2014) 989-1007.
[19]R.A. He, S.W. Cao, J.G. Yu, Recent advances in morphology control and surface
modification of Bi-based photocatalysts, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 32 (2016) 2841-
2870.
[20]C.X. Liao, Z.J. Ma, X.F. Chen, X. He, J.N. Qiu, Controlled synthesis of bismuth
oxyiodide toward optimization of photocatalytic performance, Appl. Surf. Sci.
387 (2016) 1247-1256.
[21]R.A. He, S.W. Cao, J.G. Yu, Recent advances in morphology control and surface
modification of Bi-based photocatalysts, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 32 (2016) 2841-
2870.
[22]X. Li, J.G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Hierarchical photocatalysts, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45
(2016) 2603-2636.
[23]Y.J. Sun, X. Xiao, X.A. Dong, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Heterostructured
BiOI@La(OH)3 nanorods with enhanced visible light photocatalytic NO removal,
Chin. J. of Catal. 38 (2017) 217-226.
[24]H. Liu, Y. Su, Z. Chen, Z.T. Jin, Y. Wang, Graphene sheets grafted three-
dimensional BiOBr0.2I0.8 microspheres with excellent photocatalytic activity under
visible light, J. Hazard. Mater. 266 (2014) 75-83.
[25]K. Kasinathan, Chapter 5 - green synthesis for advanced materials of graphene
oxide (GO) with ZnO for enhanced photocatalytic activity at room temperature,
(2015) 115-127.
11
[26]Y.L. Chen, C.E. Zhang, C. Deng, P. Fei, M. Zhong, B.T. Su, Preparation of
ZnO/GO composite material with highly photocatalytic performance via an
improved two-step method, Chinese. Chem. Let.24 (2013) 518-520.
[27]J.Y. Liu, Y. Bai, P.Y. Luo, P.Q. Wang, One-pot synthesis of grapheme-BiOBr
nanosheets composite for enhanced photocatalytic generation of reactive oxygen
species, Catal. Comm. 42 (2013) 58-61.
[28] Q. Li, X. Li, S. Wageh, A.A. Al-Ghamdi, J.G. Yu, CdS/graphene nanocomposite
photocatalysts, Adv. Energy Mater.5 (2015) 1500010.
[29]X. Li, J.G. Yu, S. Wageh, A.A. Al-Ghamdi, J Xie, Graphene in photocatalysis: a
review, Small. 12 (2016) 6640-6696.
[30]Q.J. Xiang, J.G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 (2012) 782-796.
[31]Q. Li, H. Li, R.M. Wang, G.F. Li, H. Yang, R. Chen, Controllable microwave and
ultrasonic wave combined synthesis of ZnO micro-/nanostructures in HEPES
solution and their shape-dependent photocatalytic activities, J. Alloys Compd.
567 (2013) 1-9.
[32]X. Yu, J.J. Shi, L.J. Feng, C.H. Li, L. Wang, A three-dimensional BiOBr/RGO
heterostructural aerogel with enhanced and selective photocatalytic properties
under visible light, Appl. Surf. Sci. 396 (2017) 1775-1782.
[33]C.H. Su, C.C. Hu, Y.C. Sun, Y.C. Hsiao, Highly active and thermo-stable anatase
TiO2 photocatalysts synthesized by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method, J.
Taiwan Ins. Chem. Eng. (2015) 1-8.
[34]J.F Niu, B.H. Yao, P. Chao, W.T. Zhang, Y.Q. Chen, Rapid microwave
hydrothermal methods synthesis of TiO2 photocatalysts using different sources of
materials, Inte. Ferro. 152 (2014) 163-173.
[35]P. Jayabal, V. Sasirekha, J. Mayandi, V. Ramakrishnan, Microwave assisted
synthesis of zinc stannate nanocubes for dye sensitized solar cell application,
Superl. Micros. 75 (2014) 775-784.
[36]R. Hao, X. Xiao, X.X. Zuo, J.M. Nan, W.D. Zhang, Efficient adsorption and
visible-light photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride using
mesoporous BiOI microspheres, J. Hazard. Mater. 209 (2012) 137-145.
[37]N.A. Khan, S.H. Jhung, Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with
microwave or ultrasound: Rapid reaction, phase-selectivity, and size reduction,
Chem. Rev. 285 (2015) 11-23.
[38]S. William, J.R. Hummers, E.O. Richard, Preparation of graphitic oxide, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. (1958) 80, 1339.
[39]B.Y. Li, H.W. Huang, Y.X. Guo, Diatomite-immobilized BiOI hybrid
photocatalyst: facile deposition synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic activity,
Appl. Surf. Sci. 353 (2015) 1179-1185.
12
[40]O. Mehraj, B.M. Pirzada, N.A. Mir, M.Z. Khan, S. Sabir, A highly efficient
visible-light-driven novel p-n junction Fe2O3/BiOI photocatalyst: surface
decoration of BiOI nanosheets with Fe2O3 nanoparticles, Appl. Surf. Sci. 387
(2016) 642-651.
[41]Q.F. Han, Z. Yang, L. Wang, An ion exchange strategy to BiOI/CH3COO(BiO)
heterojunction with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity, Chem. 403
(2017) 103-111.
[42]Y.F. Zhang, M. Park, H.Y. Kim, B. Ding, S.J. Park, In-situ synthesis of
nanofibers with various ratios of BiOClx/BiOBry/BiOIz for effective
trichloroethylene photocatalytic degradation, Appl. Surf. Sci. 384 (2016) 192-199.
13
[54]X.J. Wang, F.T. Li, D.Y. Li, Facile synthesis of flower-like BiOI hierarchical
spheres at room temperature with high visible-light photocatalytic activity,
Materials Sci. and Eng. B. 193 (2015) 112-120.
14
Fig. 1. Illustration of the preparation method of BG-2
Fig. 2. XRD patterns of (a) GO and Graphite, (b) BiOI, BG-1 and BG-2.
15
Fig. 3. SEM images of (a) BG-1, (b) BG-2, TEM images of (c) BG-1, (d) BG-2 (inset: selected area electron
diffraction pattern) and (e) HRTEM of BG-2.
16
Fig. 4. XPS spectrogram of BG-1 and BG-2: (a) survey spectrum, (b) Bi 4f, (c) I 3d, (d) O 1s, (e) C 1s; (f) C 1s
XPS spectra of GO.
Fig. 5. (a) DRS spectra of BiOI, BG-1 and BG-2 and (b)Kubelka-Munk transformation for as-synthesized samples.
17
Fig. 6. BJH pore size distribution curve of the (a) as-synthesized composites and (b) The Nitrogen adsorption-
desorption isotherm.
18
Fig. 7. (a) Raman spectrogram ;(b) FT-IR spectrogram of GO, BG-1 and BG-2 composites.
19
Fig. 8. TG-DTA curve of different samples (25 to 1000 ℃ under air atmosphere) (a)BiOI;(b) BG-1 and(c)BG-2.
20
Fig. 9. (a) PL spectra of BiOI, BG-1 and BG-2 samples ;(b) Transient photocurrent response of the sample
electrodes of BG-1 and BG-2 composites; (c) EIS Nyquist plots of BiOI, BG-1 and BG-2.
21
Fig. 10 Photocatalytic activity of different composites toward (a) MB and (b) LEV degradation, kinetics of (c) MB
and (d) LEV degradation for different photocatalyst,(e) photocatalytic activity of BG-2 with different GO contents
on the degradation of MB, (f) recycling test of BG-2 in photodegradation of MB (all the experiment under visible
light irradiation).
22
Fig. 11. The histograms of different trapping agents on photocatalytic reaction effect about BiOI, BG-1 and BG-2
23
Table 1 Textural parameters and band gaps of as-obtained composite.
Sample SBET (m2/ g) Pore volume Average pore size Band gap
(cm3/g) (nm) Eg (eV)
BG -1 36.101 0.063 6.432 2.21
BG-2 45.572 0.193 5.364 1.58
BiOI 32.212 0.169 5.208 2.31
24
Table 2 Parameters of Pseudo first-order kinetic model of the photocatalytic degradation of MB and LEV
MB LEV
Catalysts η(%) η(%)
k (min-1) k (min-1)
P25 0.00006 6 0.00148 18
BiOI 0.00479 43 0.00104 7
BG-1 0.00242 37 0.00065 8
BG-2 0.00921 68 0.00612 51
25
Table 3 The different degradation rates of MB.
26