BAR
REVIEWER
in Legal
and Judicial
Ethics
2005 Edition —oo
BAR REVIEWER
IN
LEGAL AND JUDICIAL
ETHICS
ERNANI CRUZ PANO
Retired Court Administrator, Supreme Court;
Law Professor;
Formerly Judge, Regional Trial Court,
Pasig, Br. 88, Quezon City;
Member, Supreme Court Rules of Court Revision Committee;
Committee Continuous Trial, Trial Committee;
Participant, 1978 Harvard Law School Special Program,
Quezon City: Lecturer, U.P. Law Center; U.P. College of Law
U.S.T, San Beda College of Law; MLQU, U.E.
School of Law; Participant, 1981
California Judicial College
University of California,
Academy of Trial Judges;
International Associate,
American Bar Association ~
2005 EDITION
856 Nicanor Reyes Sr, St.
Tel. Nos. 736-05-67 » 7365-13-64
1977 CM. Recto Avenue |
Tel. Nos. 735:56-27 + 735-55-34 :
Manila, Philippines
3 - ‘Introduction
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PartI
OVERVIEW OF ETHICS
Various Concepts of Ethics by Philosophers .
Divisions of Ethics
a Life .,
b, Knowledge
c Play .,
d. Aesthetic Experienc
e. Sociability (Friendship)
f. _ Practical Reasonablenes:
g. Religion...
Complaint ....
Part I
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS IN LEGAL ETHICS ....
Part Ill
CASES IN JUDICIAL ETHICS
2. Judge Liable for Dismissal for Continuing
Immoral Relation after having been Previously
Disciplined for such Misconduct
3, Immoral Advanees on a Litigant by a Judge
Ground for Dismissal .
4, A Judge should not Depend on Subordinates
to Remind Him of His Deadline...
ix
RRR WOOD DHE
92
92
93
94i
10.
nL
12,
13.
M4.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Judge could not Act on Motions without
Proof of Service won
Erroneous Anquittal by Judge a Ground
for Admonition.
One Month Salary Fine for Erroneous
Quashal of Criminal Information .
Amicable Settlement between Respondent
‘and Complainant not a Ground to
Dismiss Charges
Holding in Abeyance of Warrant of
Arrest Due to Reinvestigation Not Allowed .«
‘A Misuse of the Word “GIMMICK” While Not
Warranting Censure is Deserving of
Admonition ....
Seven-Day Salary Fine for Delivering Speech
in a Political Convention
Failure to Apply Indeterminate Judgment
‘Sentence Law. Judge Liable for Two Months
Salary Fine
What Constitutes Rendition of Judgment.
Judge Fined for Detention of Contemnor
‘on Indirect Conterapt Without Hearing
‘Non-Docketing of Cases Warrants
Reprimand..
Errors in Penalty
Denial of Inhibition Upheld..
May a judge be held administratively liable for
rendering an erroneous order or judgment
‘What is the liability of the judge who allows her
husband, a private practitioner to use the
address of her court as his office address?
Is acceptance of a consultancy contract in a GOCC
a violation of the prohibition from reappointment
imposed on a judge in the administrative cases? ...
95,
95
100
100
101
101
101
21, Serenity and Ability to Koop One's Cool
Required of Judges :
Harosament of Judges Not Countenanced ..
Calling a Party an “Octopus, Dictator” ete.,
Impropor for a Judge
Use of Car Undor Lovy
Use of Falsified Evidence
Compromise After Misappropriation
BB
Ignorance on Jurisdiction
Issue on Appeal Cannot Be Basis for
Administrative case
Affidavit of Desistance Not Ground for
Dismissal of Complaint
‘Non-Transcription of Stenographic Notes —
No Excuse for Delay in Decision
. Anonymous Complaints may be Entertained
if Verifiable from Public Records
Condonation by Judge's Wife of Husband's
Concubinage does not Preclude Dismissal
Serious or Grave Misconduct, Defined ..
Respectful Request for a Judge to Inhibit
Himeelf is not Contemp!
Prosecutor who was appointed District Judge
May Not be Charged for Actuations as
Prosecutor where Chief Executive
Dismissed Charges.
Aberrations Due to Negligence not Serious
Misconduct
37. Failure of a Judge to Inhibit Himselfin a
Case Involving his Nephew Violation
of Judicial Ethics
38. Referral of Tenancy Determination to Secretary
of Agrarian Reform is not Professional
Incompetence of the Judge .
$ B BSSEE
2
& £8 8
8
102
102
103
104
104
105
106
107
107
108
109
109
110
a
m1
112
13
11339. Contumacious Act Against the Provincial
Board May Not be Punished as Direct
Contempt of the Court of First Instance...
40, Ex-Parte Hearing Justified in the Absence
of Oppositor
41, Error of Judgment Not an Unjust Decision.
42, Dismissal Where Two Charges are
Substantially the Same .
43. Administering Oath Without AMfiant
Censurable
44, Not Evory Ruling Calls for Disciplinary
Action...
45, Effect of Cessation from Office
Part IV ‘
RULES 138-139-B, RULES OF COURT
Rule 138 — Attorneys and Admission to Bar.
Rule 138-A ~ Law Student Practice Rule
Rule 139 — Disbarment or Suspension of Attorneys
Rule 139-A — Integrated Bar of the Philippine
Rulo 139-B — Disbarment and Discipline
of Attorneys
PartV
CASE NOTES — LEGAL ETHICS
1, Unimpeachable Accounting of Clients’ Funds
Required
. Presumption of Innocence
. Attorney's Fees...
|. Conflict of Interest
. Unauthorized Settlement by Lawyer, Unethical ...
ee en
ai
m4
18
6
6
uz
117
uz
118
128
128
131
138
145
146
147
148
149
7.
10.
i
12,
13.
. Non-filing of Brief ,..
Contempt for Disrespectful Language ..
}. Notarization of Document Without Vendor's
Signature is Malpractice
Unauthorized Practice by Court Personnel,
Ground for Dismissal...
Dismissal of Criminal Action Ground to Dismi
Disbarment Proceedings
Conviction of Client Not Considered
Negligence
Filing of Motion for Extension on the Last
Day and Sending it by Registered Mail shows
Lack of Professional Competence and Diligence
Controversies With Client's on Attorney's
Fees to be Avoided
APPENDICES
231
255
257
264
274Part |
OVERVIEW OF ETHICS
Introduction
Ethies is about how we ought to live. What makes an
action the right, rather than the wrong thing to do.
Etymologically, the word Ethics is from the Greek word
ETHIKOS, in turn from ETHOS, usage, character, disposition,
manner and the more formal definition of ethics is that, it is an
inquiry into the nature, morality or moral acts; the search for
the morally good and right. Ethics is the word used to refer to
the set of rule, principles or ways of thinking that guide, or
claim authority to guide the actions of a particular group.
Ethics suggests a set of duties that require us to subordi-
nate our natural desire (including sexual desire) in order to
obey the moral law.
Various Concepts of Ethics by Philosophors
1, Plato considered Ethics as something inspired to the
weuker party by the stronger. Aristotle thought that virtue has
to be taught and then practiced, so that it becomes a habit. The
Chinese philosopher, Mencius, thought that human beings pos-
sess innate sense of right and wrong, They do evil because
adverse condition have corrupted their nature. Rousseau saw
man as a noble savage satisfied by the bounty of nature. Hu:
man being for Roussacu were naturally ethical being, It is
civilization and the concept of property that has corrupted them.
Hume posits that men are torn between their sense of human:
12 BAR REVIEWER IN LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS
‘on so that the function of ethics
ity and our avarice and ambiti u
ts that meet with the general
is to reinforce those sentiment
approval of all.
Materialist philosophers like Marx, Kant, together with
Charles Darwin confined Ethics to economic arrangement un-
der which human live — the way they produce their food, their
means of production whether they live under a feudal or capi-
talist economy. Specifically, Charles Darwin viewed that the
origin of ethies is the social instincts which bares ethical behavior
motivated by the instinctive desire to promote the common
‘good. Freud viewed that the origin of ethics is the desire to
resolve the conflict between the individual and the collective
ego.
DIVISIONS OF ETHICS
1». The field of Ethics is commonly divided into two parts —
(a) Meta ethics and (b) Normative ethies
Meta ethics deals with the reflections on philosophy of
ethics; Normative ethize is applied ethics, a study of ethics
intended to influence men. Normative ethics refers to norms,
values, rule, standards or principle that should guide our deci
sion about what we ought to do. Legal ethies:is an example of
normative ethics.
According to John Finnie, a professor of Legal Philosophy
in the University of Oxford, in his article “Natural Law and
Natural Rights” the basic values are:
A. Life
A first basic value, corresponding to the drive of self
ervation is the value of life. The term “if” here Seas
‘aspect of the vitality (vita, life) which puts a human being in
good shape for self-detormination, Hence, life here includes
bodily (including cerebral) health and freedom from the pain
that betokens organic malfunctioning or injury. And the recog-
nition, pursuit, and realization of this basic human purpose (or
internally related group of purposes) are as various as the crafty
struggle and prayer of a man overboard secking to stay afloat
until his ship turns back for him; the team-work of surgeons
OVERVIEW OF ETHICS :
and the whole network of supporting staff, ancillary services,
medical schools, ete,; road safety laws and programmes; famine
relief expeditions; fanning and rearing and fishing; food mar-
keting; the resuscitation of suicides; watching out as one steps
off the kerb,
B. Knowledge
The second basic value is knowledge, considered as desir-
able for its own sake, not merely instrumentally.
Cc. Play
The third basic aspect of human well-being is play. A cer-
tain sort of moralist analyzing human goods may overlook this
basic value, but an anthropologist will not fall to observe this
large and irreducible element in human culture. More impor-
tantly, each one of us can see the point of engaging in perform-
ances which have no point beyond the performance itself, en-
joyed for its own sake. The performance may be solitary or
social, intellectual or physical, strenuous or relaxed, highly
structured or relatively informal, conventional or ad hoe in its
pattern.... An element of play can enter into human activity,
even the drafting of enactments, but is always analytically
distinguishable from its “serious” context; and some activities,
enterprises, and institutions are entirely or primarily pure play.
Play, then, has, and is its own value.
D. Aesthetic Experience
‘The fourth basic component in our flourishing is aesthetic
experience. Many forms of play, such as dance or song or foot-
ball, are the matrix or occasion of acsthetie experience. But
beauty is not an indispensable element of play. Moreover, beau-
tiful form can be found and enjoyed in nature. Aesthetic experi-
ence, unlike play, need not involve an action of one’s own: what
is sought after and valued for its own sake may simply be the
beautiful form “outside” one, and the “inner” experience of ap-
preciation ofits beauty, But often enough the valued experience
is found in the creation and/or active appreciation of some work
of significant and satisfying form.‘ BAR REVIEWER IN LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS
E, Sociability (Friendship)
Fifthly, there is the value of that sociability which in its
weakest form is realized by a minimum of peace and harmony
amongst men, and which ranges through the forms of human
community to ite strongest form in the flowering of full friend-
ship. Some of the collaboration between one person and an-
other is no more than instrumental to the realization by each of
his own individual purposes. But friendship involves acting for
the sake of one’s friend’s purposes, one’s friend’s well-being. To
bein a relationship of friendship with at least one other person
is a fundamental form of good, is it now?
F. Practical Reasonableness
Sixthly, there is the basic good of being able to bring one’s
‘own intelligence to bear effectively (in practical reasoning that
iscues in action) on the problems of choosing one’s actions and
lifestyle shaping one’s own character. Negatively, this involves,
that me has a measure of effective freedom; positively, it in-
volves that one seeks bring an intelligent and reasonable order
into one’s own actions and habits and practical attitudes. This
order in turn has (i) an internal aspect, as when one strives to
bring one’s emotions and dispositions into the harmony of an
inner peace of mind that is not merely the product of drugs or
indoctrination nor merely passive in its orientation; and (ii) an
external aspect, as when one strives to make one’s actions (which
are external in that they change states of affairs in the world
and often enough affect the relations between persons), au-
thentic that is to say, genuine realizations of one’s own freely
ordered evaluations, preferences, hopes, and self-determina-
tion. This value is thus complex, involving freedom and reason,
integrity and authenticity. But it has a sufficient unity to be
treated as one; and for a label I choose “practical reasonableness.”
G. Religion
Soventhly, and finally in this list, there is the value of
what, since Cicero, we summarily and lamely call “religion.”
For, as there is the order of means to ends, and the pursuit of
life, truth, play and aesthetic experience in some individually
selected order of priorities and pattern of specialization, and
te en
OVERVIEW OF ETHICS 6
the order that can be brought into human relations through
collaboration, community and friendship, and the order that is
to be brought into one’s character and activity through inner
integrity and outer authenticity, so, finally there arise such
questions as (a) How are all these orders, which have their
immediate origin in human initiative and pass away in death,
related to the lasting order of the whole cosmos and to the
origin, in any, of that order? (b) Is it not perhaps the case that
human freedom, in which one rises above the determinism of
instinct and impulse to an intelligent gresp of worthwhile forms
of good, and through which one shapes and masters one’s envi-
ronment but also one’s own character, is itself somehow suber-
dinate to something which makes that human freedom, human
intelligence, and human mastery possible (not just “originally”
but from moment to moment) and which is free, intelligent and
sovereign in a way (and over a range) no human being can be?Part Il
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS IN LEGAL ETHICS
1. Q Whyis law considered a profession?
A. Aprofession is characterized by four (4) traits
sak rd
specialized body ofknowledge a commitment othe
ility to ii i
social god, the ability to regulate itself, and high
A profession is the activity of groups of
sons whor (1) are engaged in a earned ectivity (2)
the engagement is more or less full time; (3) the act
itselfis helpful to others in some important way; (4)
the persons so engaged form an organization gov-
eraing how they Practice their act; (5) the govern-
is primarily for the publi
rather than for the good of those coogi
Under this definition, law is a professi
cause law isa learned activity. Ite members hee
an advanced degree and passa difficult competency
examination. Lawyers spend much of their time pro-
viding an important service to others. Lawyers have
organized themselves with national, state, country
city associations. Among the purposes of such
associations are maintaining the integrity and com-
Petence of lawyers, making legal counsel available
(gall who need it and improving the legal system,
(See Ethice and the Legal Profession by Michacl
vis and Frederick A. Elliston, pp. 24-25)
- Q. Judge G was assigned a courthouse, a residential
bullding. He devoted some rooms in the house for
GAL ETHICS 1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS IN 11
the dwelling of his family. When the owner com:
plained, he cited the housing shortage. Also, that
hho Is able to guard court records. Is the Judge Ik
able?
‘A. Yes, Such use of the court’s premises inevitably de-
grades the honor and dignity of the court and hence
prejudices the administration of justice. Activities
of a judge in respect of their personal affairs aro
subject to the supervisory authority of the court
whenever such conduct places the entire judiciary
in danger of public disrepute. (Min. Resolution, Adm.
RTJ 89-327, 17 October 1991, citing Babatio vs. Tan,
109 SCRA 417)
3. @. May a lawyer be considered as engaging in law
practice although he does not appear In court liti-
gations?
A. Yes. Atty. M’s past work experiences as a lawyer
economist, a lawyer-manager, a lawyer-entre-
preneur of industry, a lawyer-negotiator of contracts,
anda lawyer legislator of both the rich and the poor
— verily more than satisfy the constitutional
requirement — thathe has been engaged in the prac-
tice of law for at least ten years.
‘The practice of law is not limited to the con-
duct in court, (Land Title Abstract and Trust Co. vs.
Dworken, 129 Ohio St. 23, 193 N.B. 660)A person is
‘also considered to be in the practice of law when he:
“xxx for valuable consideration engaged
in the business of advising person, firms, as-
sociations or corporations as to their rights
under the law, or appears in a representative
capacity as an advocate in proceedings pend-
ing or prospective, before any court, commis-
sioner, referee, board, body, committee, or com-
mission constituted by law or authorized to set
tle controversies and there, in such representa
tive capacity performs any act or acts for the
purpose of obtaining or defending the rights ofBAR REVIEWER IN LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS
their clicnts under the law. Otherwise stated,
one who in a representative capacity, engages
in the business of advising clients as to their
rights under the law, or while so engaged per-
forms any act or acts either in court or outside
of court for that purpose, is engaged in the prac-
tice of law.” (State ex rel. Mckitrick vs. C.S.
Dudley and Co,, 102 S.W. 2d 895, 340 Mo. 852)
‘This Court in the case of Philippine Lawyers
Association vs, Agrava (105 Phil. 173, 176-177)
stated:
“The practice of law is not limited to the
conduct of cases or litigation in court; it em-
braces the preparation of pleadings and other
papers incident to actions and special proceed-
ings, the management of such actions and pre-
ceedings on behalf of clients before judges and
courts, and in addition, conveying. In general,
all advice to clients, and all action taken for
them in matters connected with the law incor-
poration services, assessment and condemna-
tion services contemplating an appearance
before a judicial body, the foreclosure of a mort-
goge, enforcement of acreditor’s claim in bank-
ruptey and insolvency proceedings, and con-
ducting proceedings in attachment, and in
matters of estate and guardianship have been
held to constitute law practice, as do the prepa-
ration and drafting of legal instruments, where
the work done involves the determination by
the trained legl ind fhe legal fet oics
and conditions.” (Cayetano vs. M
100113, 3 September 1991) ono
4. Q May a lawyer execute a mortgage contract over
the estate proporty after partition is aj
pproved but
botore the estate proceeding is declared closed?
No. Until estate proceeding i
uU ig is declared closed and
terminated, even if a project of partition has been
5. Q.
6 a
A.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS IN LEGAL ETHICS
approved, estate property still in litigation and at-
torney for the estate cannot execute a mortgage con-
tract over estate property. (Fornilda vs. Bradish 164,
GR. No, 72306, 24 Jan. 1989)
Distinguish the power to cite for contempt and the
disciplinary power over lawyers.
Disciplinary power is broader than the power to cite
for contempt. Contempt power does not exhaust the
court's disciplinary power — a lawyer's act which
obstructs or degrades administration of justice con-
stitutes both professional misconduct and contuma-
cious conduct.
It cannot be said that the exercise of discipli-
nary authority by the court when it is unjustly at-
tacked constitutes the court an offended party, pros-
ecutor and judge at the same time,
A libel suit is not the remedy of the judge be-
cause the outrage is directed not to the judge as such
but to the court as an organ of the administration of
justice. Also, a judge must confine his time exelu-
sively in discharging his public duties; public inter-
est suffers when the judge is disrobed of his judicial
‘authority to face his assailant on equal grounds to
prosecute cases as a private individual. (Zaldivar
vs. Gonzales, G.R. Ne. 60578, 7 Oct. 1988)
Is indefinite suspension of a lawyer a cruel pun-
Ishment?
No. Indefinite suspension gives the lawyer the key
to the restoration of his right by giving him a chance
to purge himself in his own good time of his con-
tempt or misconduct by acknowledging his miscon-
duct, exhibiting appropriate repentance, and dem-
onstrating his willingness and capacity to live up to
the exacting standards required of every lawyer.
(Zaldivar vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 80578, 1 Feb.
1989)10
2 Qa
2a
A
BAR REVIEWER IN LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS
What is the criterla for reinstatement of a disbarred
lawyer?
‘a. Appreciation of the significance of his derelic-
tion.
b. Assurance to the court that he now possesses
the requisite probity and integrity necessary
to guarantee his worthiness to be restored to
the practice of law. ‘
¢. the time elapsed between disbarment and ap-
plication for reinstatement.
good conduct and honorable dealing subse-
quent to his disbarment.
€. active involvement in civic, educational and re-
ligious organizations.
£ favorable indorsement of IBP as well as local
government officials and citizens of his com-
munity.
g. the pleas of his mother and wife for the sake
and fortune of his family. (Tan vs. Sabandal,
170 SCRA 211)
May a lawyer with a contingent fee agreement ap-
peal an order of dismissal in substitution of his
own client who asked for the dismissal of the es-
tate proceeding?
No. The lawyer of testamentary heirs under a con-
tingent fee contract cannot substitute for his client
who acks for dismissal of probate proceedings; law-
yer cannot appeal on behalf of client, (Leviste vs.
Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-29164, 30 Jan, 1989)
When should the amount of att
termined? ettoregys Tes beiGe
‘The determination of attorney's fees may be mad
only after the main litigation has been decided The
determination may be made in the same action in
M
412.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS IN LEGAL ETHICS "
which the services have been rendered although the
attorney’ fees is less than the amount prescribed
for the court’s jurisdiction. (Quirante vs. LAC, G.R.
No. 73886, 31 Jan. 1989)
Lawyer B recorded a charging lien in the case. Ak
though the case was dismissed, and there was no
award for his client, he asked the court to order
payment of fees. Is this tenable?
No. Where no amount is awarded to a party, and
hence, there is nothing to generate such lien, the
lawyer's lien cannot be enforced. He must institute
a separate suit for his fees.
Also, a lawyer has no lien on the land of his
client although he successfully prosecuted an action
toestablish the client's title thereto. There is no stat-
ute authorizing such lion. (See Metropolitan Bank
and Trust Co. vs. CA, G.R. Nos. 8610-03, 23 Jan.
1990, Second Division)
J&B were former partners of XYZ law office. They
tesigned and formed their law office which repre-
sented SIH against PBC, who Is represented by
XYZ law firm. PBC objects to the appearance of J
&B who demurred on the ground that they did not
participate in the case of PBC when they were still
members of the XYZ law office. May J & B be dis-
qualified?
Yes, Whether or not J & B participated in the case
of PBC when they were still members of XYZ law
firm is of no moment. As former members of the XYZ
law firm, they were privy to information that may
be prejudicial to PBC’s cause of action. (Phil. Bloom-
ing Mills Co. vs, CA, G.R. No. 87053, 29 Nov. 1989)
Would you consider the following statements in a
pleading before a Supreme Court disrespectful lar
guage meriting sanction?13,
BAR REVIEWER IN LEGALAND JUDICIAL ETHICS
decision of the Court in the above
sitsoea Case reads more like a brief for the
Ayala x xx. The Court not ‘only put to serious:
question its own integrity and competence
but also jeopardized Its own campaign
against graft and corruption undeniably per.
‘vading the judiclary xx x. Itis submitted that
this ruling is the most serious reflection on
the Court’s competence and Integrity and
exemplifies its manifest partiality towards
Ayala xxx.”
‘A. Theremarks made by a former judge is disrespect-
ful and warrants imposition of a fine. As a former
judge, counsel should know that in any litigation,
‘one party prevails but his success will not justify
indictment of bribery by the other party. Respond-
ent is entitled to his opinion but not licensed to in-
sult the Court with derogatory statements and re-
course to argumenta ad hominem. (Sangalang vs.
IAC, G.R. No, 71169, 30 Aug. 1989)
Q. Atty. A, a rich man and chairman of a college of
medicine and very much married, engaged in
‘sexual intercourse with a student of the school and
begot a child with hor. The Solicitor General
lier, recommended a three-year suspension for the
lawyer. As the matter was pending for ten years
since the recommendation was made, and further
that complainant had gone and with respondent
knowing him to be a married man, asked for the
dismissal of the case for being moot and academic.
The OSG asked the Court to consider respondent
suspended for the ten-year period the case was
pending as the lawyer was not engaged in law prac-
tice. Is the recommendation tenable?
A. No. The lawyer should be disbarred. As the lawyer,
a rich man, is not really practicing, his suspension
would serve no redeeming purpose. The fact that he
is arich man and does not practice, does not render
respondent a person of good moral character. (De
los Reyes vs. Aznar, AM No. 1334, 28 Nov. 1989)
14. a
A.
15. Q
A
6. a
A
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS IN LEGAL ETHICS 18
When is a judge deemed to have “knowingly ren-
dered” an unjust decision?
A judge is expected to follow the rules prescribed
to ensure a fair and unpartial hearing, assess the
different factors that emerge therefrom and bear
on the issues presented, and as the basis of the
conclusions he finally established, with only his
conscience and knowledge of the law to guide him,
adjudicate the case accordingly. If in the view of
the judge, the evidence for the defense was enti-
tled to more weight and credence, he cannot be
held to account administratively for the result of
his ratiocination. For that is the very essence of
judicial inquiry; otherwise the burdens of judicial
office would be intolerable.
Mere errors in the appreciation of evidence,
unless so gross and patent as to produce an infer-
ence of ignorance or bad faith, or that the judge
knowingly rendered an unjust decision are irrel-
evant and immaterial in administrative proceeding
against him, (Miranda vs. Manalastas, AM. MTJ
89-159, 21 Dec. 1989)
When are libelous statements considered privi-
leged?
‘These statements are privileged only when relevant
to the issues raised. Thus, in a collection case filed
by @ rural bank against a borrower, a third party
complaint against the bank manager which imputes
to the bank manager acts of misappropriation that
were unrelated to the issue of indebtedness, the li-
belous statements were not deemed privileged.
(Paredes vs. IAC, G.R, No. 70717, 9 May 1990)
May ajudge file a petition for certiorari to review a
Court of Appeals decision which reversed or
modified his decision?
No. The judge is only a nominel party impleaded to
comply with the rules. A decent regard for the judi-1“
17. @
A
18. Q
A
19. a
A
‘BAR REVIEWER IN LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS
; ing against the
cial hierarchy bars a judge from sun
adverse opinion ofa higher court. panting ure
of Appeals, G.R. No. 1-46845, April 27, 1990)
Ajudge of a Municipal Trial Court struck off an an-
swer prepared by 2 party calling it a mere “scrap
of paper” without the assistance of a counsel. He
advised the party to secure a lawyer. Does this
constitute misconduct?
A party need not be a lawyer to conduct his own
litigation. It is not therefore correct to consider the
answer a “mere scrap of paper.” However, a judge
may properly advise a party to seek assistance of a
lawyer so that the party’s pleading may be properly
prepared in the interest of orderliness and efficiency.
(Cabandong vs. Judge Calderon, AM No. RTJ-8943,
20 Feb. 1990)
‘Aludge did not disclose that he had pending criml-
nal cases filed against him at the time of his ap-
pointment. His defense was that he is presumed
innocent of the charges before his conviction. May
he be removed for such non-disclosure?
‘Yes, He had the duty to disclose such information to
enable the appointing authority to determine his
eligibility for the office. Every prospective appointee
must apprise the appointing authority of every mat-
ter hearin on his fitness for judicial office, includ-
ing those that reflect on his integrity and probity as
he On ar uoten. (3) of the 1987 Consti-
n. (Office of the Court Administrator vs. J
Estacion, AM RTJ.87.104, 11 Jan, 1980) ue
May a lawyor terminate his bar membership?
Yes, under See. 21, Art. If of th
21, Art, ie IBP By-Laws, a 73-
year old lawyer who had not practiced hia profes-
on ne his retirement as a government official
as allowed to terminate by the Court after filing
20.
24.
a
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS IN LEGAL ETHICS 15
the requisite verified notice of termination with the
Secretary of the Integrated Bar. (In re Atty. Jose
Principe, Bar No. 543, 20 Sept. 1990)
May the Solicitor General refuse to appearinacase
if he disagrees with the stand of a government
agency seeking to be represented by his office?
No, Even if the opinion of the Solicitor General is,
inconsistent with the government or any ofits agen-
cies he is expected to represent, he should still ap-
pear and inform the Court of his stand.
‘Thus, in criminal cases, the Solicitor General
may recommend acquittal. The Solicitor General is
the lawyer of the government in any litigation pro-
ceeding, investigation, or matter requiring the serv-
jces of a lawyer. The only exception is when such
officials or agents are being charged criminally or
are being civilly sued for damages arising from a
felony. (Orbos vs. Civil Service Commission, G.R. No.
92561, 12 Sept. 1990)
Atty. V was the managing partner of a partnership
HUV and at the same time legal counsel of L, in the
latter's capacity as a special administrator of the
Intestate estate of F. The partnership HJV and the
‘estate represented by L executed a lease contract
cover sugar lands owned by the estate with Atty. V
signing as manager of the partnership. Charged
with misconduct, his defense was that he only
acted as agent of HJV, and also the heirs of the
estate acquiesced and consented to the contract.
ts this tenable?
No. This conduct is contrary to Arts, 1461 and 1646
of the New Civil Code, prohibiting acquisition of the
client's property, Canon 1 of the Code of Professional
Responsibility and Secs. 3 and 26, Rule 188, Rules
of Court. (See Mananguil vs. Villagas, Adm. 2430,
)
30 August 1