Life expectancy is the average number of years a person in a
population could expect to live after age x. It is the life table parameter most commonly used to compare the survival experience of populations. The age most often selected to make comparisons is 0.0 (i.e., birth), although, for many substantive and policy analyses, other ages such as 65+ and 85+ are more relevant and may be used.
ACTIVE LIFE EXPECTANCY:
Active life expectancy, the average number of years a person can expect to live without chronic disability, is a better measure of the health status of populations in economically developed countries than total life expectancy because the latter has reached levels where most early deaths have been prevented and large survival increases are now likely only at later ages. It is important to assess whether such life expectancy increases are associated with improved quality of life, the capability for independent living, and continued economic activity.
LIFE EXPECTANCY AND ADULT MORTALITY IN
INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTIRES: Life expectancy at birth increased rapidly in industrialized countries from 1950 to 1970 mainly as a result of the decline in mortality from infectious diseases brought about by the introduction of antibiotics. The increase in life expectancy continued after 1970 in market economy countries. This was mainly attributable to the decline in mortality from cardiovascular diseases among middle-aged and elderly people. Female life expectancy is higher than male life expectancy in all countries, but the size of the difference varies. The sex differential increased in practically all countries from the 1950s to the late 1970s, but then started to diminish in Northern and Western Europe, North America, and Oceania, where the average difference was approximately six years in the 1990s. The lower life expectancy of men is due partly to biological and partly to behavioral factors. Persons in lower socioeconomic positions die on average at a younger age than those in higher positions. This difference is smaller among women than men. Average global life expectancy is currently 71.5 years. Japanese women liver longer than anyone else in the world, with an average life expectancy of 87. In Sierra Leone, on the other hand, men and women live only to the age of 50 on average. According to the Berlin Institute for Population and Development, people in the predominantly wealthy regions of the world live 17 years more on average than those living in Africa.
REASON FOR INCREASE IN LIFE EXPECTANCY:
Life expectancy around the world has increased steadily for nearly 200 years. During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, an increase in life expectancy was driven mainly by improvements in sanitation, housing, and education, causing a steady decline in early and mid-life mortality, which was chiefly due to infections. This trend continued with the development of vaccines and then antibiotics. By the latter half of the twentieth century, there was little room for further reduction in early and mid-life mortality. The continuing increase is due almost entirely to a new phenomenon: the decline in late-life mortality. PROBLEMS CAUSED BY INCREASED HUMAN LONGETIVITY: The major problem with merely increasing life expectancy is that it also increases morbidity simply because people live long enough to get more age-related disease, disability, dementia and dysfunction. Consequently, disability increases dramatically with age: such that more than 80% of the UK population over the age of 85 years reports having a disability Moreover, disabilities in late life are more likely to be multiple and severe, so that 50% of people over the age of 85 years require care and/or help with daily activities. Decreasing death rates without reducing age-specific morbidity rates will inevitably increase morbidity, including severe disability and dementia. Even in the absence of disease and disability, human abilities—including memory, cognition, mobility, sight, hearing, taste and communication—decline with age (Fig(Fig3),3), so that the quality of life for someone older than 90 years is on average very poor 3. Given the increasing prevalence of multiple diseases, disabilities, dementias and dysfunctions at high age, it is not obvious that just extending lifespan beyond 90 years of age is a worthwhile undertaking. Consequently, it is unclear why we are currently investing so much money in cancer and cardiovascular research aimed at reducing death rates in the elderly, if the consequence is more years lived with disease, dementia, disability and advanced ageing.