Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. May an obligor recover although there has been no strict and complete fulfillment by him of his
obligation?
Yes, the obligor may recover although there has been no strict and complete fulfillment by him
of his obligation and according to Article 1234 if the obligation has been substantially
performed by the obligor in good faith.
In the delivery of a specific thing the debtor of a thing cannot compel the creditor to receive a
different one, real obligation to deliver a specific thing a thing different from that due cannot be
offered or demanded against the will of the creditor or debtor. As of to personal(negative or
positive) obligations the act to be performed or the act prohibited cannot be substituted against
the obligee’s will.
In delivery of generic thing, substation is allowed whereby property is alienated to the creditor is
satisfaction of a debt in money, shall be governed by the law of sales.
4. What must a debtor do to be released from his obligation if the creditor refuses to accept payment
without any justifiable reason?
If the creditor refuses to accept payment without any justifiable reason, the debtor can be
released from his obligation by the consignation of the thing.
5. Give the requisites of payment by cession. What rights are acquired by the creditor in this form of
payment as distinguished from dation on payment?
1. Give two cases when a person may be released from an obligation validly entered into.
- First case in Article 1266 where a person can be released from his obligation when the
prestation becomes legally or physically impossible without the fault of the obligor,
Example Arman a potter he is obliged to make small pots to Ana for giveaways for her
wedding but a week after Arman is one of the victim of booming in their area which
cause to cut his left arm In that he is released from his obligation because it is physically
impossible to make a pot with one arm
- Second, According to Article 1267, the obligor may also be released from his obligation
when the service has become so difficult as to be manifestly beyond the contemplation of
the parties example DMD a construction company will delivered a construction supply in
a mountain area in Cebu but an earthquake hit the province and a sinkhole rise on the
highway going to that mountain are therefore the DMD is released from his obligation
because it is impossible to pass by a sinkhole.
2. Give the cases when loss of the specific thing to be delivered will not exempt the obligor from
liability even in the absence of fault or delay.
The cases when loss of the specific thing to be delivered will not exempt the obligor
from liability even in the absence of fault or delay are?
- when the law so provides
- when the stipulation so provides
- when the nature of the obligation requires the assumption of risk
- when the obligation to deliver a specific thing arises from a crime.
3. Will partial loss of the specific thing to be delivered extinguish the obligation? Explain
According to Article 1264, the courts shall determine whether the circumstances, the
partial loss of the object of the obligation is so important as to extinguish the obligation.
If there is a partial loss when only a portion of the thing is lost or destroy or when it
suffers from depreciation. In case of partial loss the court will decide. \
Discussions
1. Give the requisites in order that a condition or remission of debt may be valid.
2. When is the condonation or remission of debt considered inofficious? What is the remedy of
the party adversely affected thereby?
Remission of debt is considered inofficious if he give more than he can give by will and
it shall be reduced by the court accordingly. The remedy of the part adversely affected
thereby shall be reduced by courts.
Discussion
According to Article 1275 if the obligation is extinguished from the time the characters
of creditor and debtor are merged in the same person. It is extinguished because if the
debtor is his own creditor the enforcement of the obligation becomes absurd since a
person cannot claim payment from himself.
1. What are the distinctions between confusion and compensation as modes for extinguishing an
obligation?
The distinctions between confusion and compensation according Article 1278 are:
First in confusion there is only one person who is creditor and debtor of himself, while in
compensation there are two persons involved , each of whom is a debtor and a creditor of
other. Then, in confusion there is one obligation on the other hand in compensation,
there is indirect payment. Lastly, in confusion there is impossibility of payment while in
compensation, there is indirect payment.
compensation is similar to
payment in a way due to
the fact that application of
payments can be applied to
compensation.
Compensation is similar to payment in a way due to the fact that application of payments
shall apply to the order of the compensation.
3. May there be compensation although the things due are not consumable? Explain
No, because according to Article 1279, paragraph 2, compensation will take place if both
consists of sum of money or if the things due are consumable, they be of the same kind
and also the same quality.
4. When may compensation take place when only one of the debts is due?
According to Article 1279, the compensation will not take place when the debtsare not
due on the same date.
Discussions
2. When there is subrogation, what rights are acquired by the new creditor?
According to Article 1303, All the rights and action are transferred to the new creditor
that could have been exercised by the former creditor either against the debtor or against
third person, be they guarantors or mortgagors.