Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF LAW
B. CESSION
Abandonment of the totality of the property of the debtor in favor of the creditors
Only the possession and administration of the properties are transferred to the
creditors; they do not become owners of the property
Requires plurality of creditors and insolvency of the debtor
Debtor is released only to the extent of net proceeds of the properties sold by the
creditors
Debt is considered extinguished when the creditor accepts the consignation or when
the court declares that consignation has been properly made.
APPLICATION OF PAYMENT
Page 1 of 13
B. REQUISITES
A. WHEN IS A THING CONSIDERED LOST – when the thing perishes, goes out of commerce,
or disappears in such a way that its existence is unknown or it cannot be recovered; also,
in case of partial loss where the portion lost is of such importance in relation to the whole
obligation
1) When the prestation becomes physically or legally impossible without the fault of the
debtor
2) When the service has become so difficult as to be manifestly beyond the contemplation
of the parties – this is also called the “Doctrine of the Frustration of the Commercial
Object, or Unforeseen Events” (see Art. 1267), performance is extremely difficult, but
not impossible
E. LOSS CAUSED BY A THIRD PERSON – obligation is extinguished; creditor can recover from
the third person
A. CONCEPT - gratuitous abandonment by the creditor of his right; an act of liberality on the
part of the obligee who renounces enforcement of the obligation without receiving any
price or equivalent from the obligor
Page 2 of 13
B. REQUISITES
A. CONCEPT – meeting of the characters of creditor and debtor in the same person
B. REQUISITES – (1) takes place in the person of the principal creditor and principal debtor;
(2) complete and definite; and (3) only one/same obligation.
COMPENSATION
B. KINDS
1) Legal compensation – takes place ipso jure when all the 5 requisites under Art. 1279
are present
2) Conventional or voluntary compensation – occurs when the parties agree to the mutual
extinguishment of their respective obligations; 2 requisites only (a) capacity to dispose
the credit sought to be compensated, and (b) consent of the parties
3) Facultative compensation – only one of the parties to the obligation has the right to
claim compensation
4) Judicial compensation – when the court allows the set-off or counterclaim of the
defendant as against the claim of the plaintiff
1) If assignment is made after legal compensation had taken place – assignment will not
affect the debtor because the obligation was already extinguished before the
assignment
2) If assignment is made prior to legal compensation taking place and assignment was
made:
With debtor’s consent – debtor cannot set up compensation against the
assignee, EXC: debtor reserved his right
With debtor’s knowledge but without his consent – debtor may set up the
compensation of debts existing previous to the assignment but not of
subsequent ones
Without debtor’s knowledge – debtor may set up the compensation of all
credits existing prior to, or even after the assignment, until he had knowledge
of the assignment
NOVATION
Page 3 of 13
first, either by changing its object or principal condition, or substituting another in place
of the debtor, or subrogating a third person in the right of the creditor.
B. REQUISITES
C. KINDS
Old debtor must be released and the new debtor assumes his place
Indispensable requirement = creditor’s consent which may be express or implied
Insolvency or non-fulfillment by the new debtor will not revive the liability of the old
debtor; EXC: Art. 1295
2 forms of substitution:
1) Expromision – initiative comes from a third person; consent required = 2 parties
only, i.e. third person/new debtor and creditor; third person entitled only to
beneficial reimbursement when he pays without the knowledge or against the will
of the old debtor
2) Delegacion – initiative comes from the debtor; consent required = all 3 parties,
i.e. old debtor, creditor, and new debtor
CONTRACTS
Meeting of minds between two persons whereby one binds himself, with respect to the
other, to give something or to render some service.
Distinguished from obligation: contract is one of the sources of obligation; contract is the
cause while obligation is the effect
Page 4 of 13
Distinguished from quasi-contract (QC): contract requires consent of the parties while QC
does not require mutual consent it being a unilateral act; basis of a contract is the will of
the parties while for QC is the law that no one should be unjustly enriched at the expense
of another.
A. ELEMENTS
1) Essential elements – necessary for the existence of the contract (consent, object, and
cause/consideration, plus delivery of the object in real contracts)
2) Natural elements – presumed to exist in certain contracts unless there is an express
stipulation to the contrary (e.g. warranties in a contract of sale)
3) Accidental elements – exist only when the parties expressly provide them (e.g.
interest, place of payment, conditions, period)
B. CLASSIFICATION
2) According to cause
Onerous – valuable consideration
Gratuitous – generosity/liberality of the benefactor
Remunerative – benefit or service previously rendered
5) According to name
Nominate – contract has particular or special name in the Civil Code
Innominate – recognized in the Civil Code but without a special name (see Art.
1307)
Page 5 of 13
C. STAGES
Contracting parties may establish such stipulations, clauses, terms, and conditions
as they may deem convenient, provided these are not contrary to law, morals,
good customs, public order, or public policy
Freedom to stipulate is not absolute; stipulations are subject to compliance to law
Contract must bind both parties; its validity or compliance cannot be left to the will
of one of them
Unilateral acts are not binding, EXC: if accepted by the other party
Contact of adhesion does not violate the principle of mutuality because the party
who adheres to a ready-made form contract is free to reject that contract
Third person is allowed to determine performance and such determination
becomes obligatory from the time it is made known to the parties; EXC: evidently
inequitable (Art. 1310)
GR: contracts are effective only between the parties, their assigns, and their heirs
EXC: nature of obligation; stipulation; provision of law such as stipulation pour
autrui/stipulation in favor of a third person (Art. 1311, 2nd par), contracts creating
real rights (Art. 1312), contracts intended to defraud creditors (Art. 1313), tort
interference (Art. 1314), accion directa (Art. 1729)
Contract is perfected by mere consent, i.e. when the parties agree on the subject
matter and cause
EXC: real contract – mere consent will not perfect the contract, delivery is
indispensable (Art. 1316)
Obligations arising from contracts have the force of law between the contracting
parties and should be complied with in good faith.
Courts have no alternative but to enforce the contract as agreed and written
provided the contract is perfected, valid, and enforceable. They cannot relieve
parties from obligations voluntary assumed.
CONSENT
Conformity of wills
Meeting of the offer and acceptance upon the thing and cause which are to constitute the
contract
Page 6 of 13
A. OFFER
B. ACCEPTANCE
C. OPTION CONTRACT
1) Minors
2) Insane or demented persons (EXC during lucid intervals)
3) Deaf-mutes who do not know how to write and read
4) Persons suffering from civil interdiction
5) Incompetents under guardianship
Page 7 of 13
3) Intimidation (Art. 1335)
Reasonable and well-grounded fear of an imminent and grave peril upon one’s
person or property, or upon the person or property of one’s spouse, descendants,
or ascendants
It must be the reason for entering the contract
The threatened act must be unjust or unlawful
Contract is still voidable if employed by a third person who is not a party to the
contract
Not considered as intimidation (thus contract is not voidable): threat to enforce
one’s legal or just claim through competent authority (Art. 1335, last par.)
Taking improper advantage of one’s power over another’s will resulting to the
deprivation of freedom of choice by the other party
Circumstances to consider: confidential, family, spiritual, and other relations
between the parties; mental weakness; ignorance; financial distress
Insidious words or machinations of one of the parties to induce the other party to
enter into the contract
2 kinds: (a) dolo causante (causal fraud) – fraud as defined under Art. 1338 which
results to a voidable contract; (b) dolo incidente (incidental fraud) – deceptions or
misrepresentations which are not serious in character and without which the other
party would still have entered the contract; may result to liability for damages
Not considered as fraud (thus contract is not voidable): dealer’s talk (Art. 1340);
expert’s opinion (Art. 1341); misrepresentation by a third person EXC: if it caused
substantial mistake on both parties (Art. 1342); misrepresentation in good faith
(Art. 1343); employed by both parties/in pari delicto (Art. 1344)
F. SIMULATED CONTRACTS
OBJECT OF CONTRACTS
Page 8 of 13
CAUSE OF CONTRACTS
Essential reason which moves the contracting parties to enter into the contract
Kinds: onerous, gratuitous, remuneratory
Requisites: existing, true, and lawful
Different from motive - particular purpose for entering the contract; no effect on contract
Lesion or gross inadequacy of cause – contract is still valid; EXC: if there is fraud, mistake,
or undue influence in agreeing to an inadequate cause = contract becomes voidable
FORM OF CONTRACTS
A. GR: Contracts are obligatory in whatever form they may have been entered into, provided
all the essential requisites for validity are present.
2) Contracts which require form for enforceability - see Art. 1403(2) [non-compliance =
unenforceable contract]
3) Contracts which require form for convenience – see Art. 1358 [non-compliance = still
a valid contract between the parties, but cannot bind third persons]
REFORMATION OF INSTRUMENTS
A remedy in equity
A written instrument is made or construed so as to express or conform to the real intention
of the parties
Requisites:
1) Meeting of minds of the parties to the contract
2) Instrument does not express the true intention of the parties
3) Due to mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct, or accident
4) Clear and convincing proof
5) Proper prescriptive period (10 years from execution of instrument)
Page 9 of 13
INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS
DEFECTIVE CONTRACTS
I. RESCISSIBLE CONTRACTS
Contracts which have caused economic damage either to one of the parties to the contract
or to a third person, and which may be set aside even if valid; it may be set aside in whole
or in part to the extent of the damage caused.
B. CHARACTERISTICS
C. REQUISITES
1) Must originate from any of the causes under Arts. 1381 and 1382
2) No other means to obtain reparation for the damage caused (i.e. subsidiary)
3) Object of the contract must not be in the possession of a third person who did not act
in bad faith
4) Filed within 4 years from accrual of the right of action
Page 10 of 13
D. KINDS
1) Contracts entered by guardians on behalf of wards and the wards suffer lesion by
more than one-fourth of the value of the object
5) Other contracts specially declared by law to be subject to rescission (e.g. Art. 1189(4),
1203)
Premature payments
The debtor is insolvent and the debt is not yet due
Payment made can be rescinded
Contracts that have all the essential requisites for the perfection of contract but the
element of consent is defective either because of want of capacity of one of the parties
or because of vitiated consent
A. CHARACTERISTICS
1) Valid and binding, and produces all its civil effects until it is set aside by a final
judgment of a competent court in an action for annulment
2) Defective by reason of want of capacity or by vitiated consent
3) Defect can be cured through ratification
4) Right of action may be lost by prescription – see Art. 1391
5) Defect cannot be attacked collaterally
Page 11 of 13
C. WHO CAN ASK FOR ANNULMENT – see Arts. 1397, 1401
Contracts which cannot be sued upon or enforced by court action unless ratified
A. CHARACTERISTICS
B. KINDS
1) Unauthorized contracts
Contracts entered in the name of another by one who has no authority or who
has acted in excess of authority
May be ratified by the person on whose behalf the contract was entered into
before the contract is revoked by the other contracting party
Rule does not apply to sale of parcel of land or an interest therein by an agent
who has no written authority from the principal = void contract, not merely
unenforceable
Page 12 of 13
IV. VOID OR INEXISTENT CONTRACTS
Contracts which are contrary to law and those which do not comply with the essential
elements of a contract
A. CHARACTERISTICS
B. KINDS
1) Inexistent contracts – those that do not comply with the essential elements of a
contract
1) If both are guilty, they shall have no action against each other. Both shall be
prosecuted and the effects or instruments of the crime shall be confiscated in favor of
the government.
2) If only one is guilty or they are not of equal guilt, the guilty party shall be prosecuted.
The effects or instruments of the crime shall be confiscated in favor of the government.
The innocent party may claim what he has given, or if he has not given anything yet,
he shall not be bound to comply with his promise.
Same rules as C.1 and C.2 above, except that there shall be no confiscation of effects/
instruments
E. THE PARI DELICTO RULE – In void contracts where the nullity proceeds from the illegality
of the cause or the purpose of the contract, whether the attendant facts constitute an
offense or misdemeanor or whether the consideration involved is merely rendered illegal,
and the two parties are equally at fault, the law leaves them as they are and denies
recovery by either one of them.
EXC: Arts. 1413 to 1419 (law gives affirmative relief and allows recovery)