Case No.

: HC/S/1234/2015/SILE IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

Date of Filing : 02/10/2015 REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
Time of Filing :
Doc Control No.: 2015111/B Suit No. HC/S/1234/2015/SILE

Between

EPICUREAN DELIGHTS PTE LD

(CO REG NO. 124567890D)
…Plaintiff

And

____________________
DAMIEN DRAKE
Senior Assistant Registrar (NRIC NO. S1234567A)
Supreme Court …Defendant
Singapore

=======================================

PARTICULARS SERVED PURSUANT

TO REQUEST

=======================================

Shanice Ang Xuan Run

Ang LLC
1 Pivett Drive #12-01
Singapore 901256
Ref: 2015/FMS/Client1/01

Filed the 2nd day of October 2015

1
 PARTICULARS SERVED PURSUANT TO REQUEST

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE

Suit No. HC/S/1234/2015/SILE

Between
EPICUREAN DELIGHTS PTE LTD
(CO REG NO. 124567890D)
…Plaintiff
And

DAMIEN DRAKE
(NRIC NO. S1234567A)
…Defendant

Further and better particulars of the statement of claim.

Served pursuant to request dated the 25th day of September 2015.

1. Paragraph 3 of the request for Further and Better Particulars (“FABP Request”)

a. The terms of remuneration for the Defendant for the position of Head Chef:

The Defendant would be entitled to $15,000.00 per month and a 20% share of the profits, for
taking on the position of Head Chef.

b. The consideration given to the Defendant in return for the Plaintiff’s usage of the Defendant’s
name as the restaurant’s operational name:

Should the Defendant cease to be employed by the Plaintiff, or after 3 years decide not to
continue as head chef, the Defendant would be entitled to 10% of the profits for so long as the
Plaintiff continued the business under the name “Damien Drake”.

c. The definition of the “operational issues” referred to in Paragraph 4(b) of the SOC:

Not entitled to response.

2. Paragraph 4 of the FABP Request

a. Request for provision of the relevant supporting documents pertaining to the tenancy
agreement between the Plaintiff and Marina Bay Sands:

2
 Not entitled to response.

b. Whether it was communicated to the Defendant that in the event he did not take up the
position of Head Chef, he would have to bear the: (a) Costs of the rent; and (b) Forfeiture of
the 3-month security deposit:

No such communication between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

3. Paragraph 5 of the FABP Request

a. The commencement date of the advertisements:

Not entitled to response.

b. The type of advertisements utilised:

Not entitled to response.

c. Request for provision of the supporting advertisement invoice(s):

Not entitled to response.

d. Whether it was communicated to the Defendant that in the event he did not take up the
position of Head Chef, he would have to bear the advertisement costs:

No such communication between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

4. Paragraph 6 of the FABP Request

a. The commencement date of renovation works:

Not entitled to response.

b. Request for provision of the supporting invoice(s) for the renovation works:

Not entitled to response.

c. Whether it was communicated to the Defendant that in the event he did not take up the
position of Head Chef, he would have to bear the renovation costs:

No such communication between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

5. Paragraph 7 of the FABP Request

a. Request for provision of a list of employees; their respective designations; and

remunerations:

3
 Not entitled to response.

b. Request for provision of a copy of the employment agreement between the Plaintiff and its
employees:

Not entitled to response.

c. Whether it was communicated to the Defendant that in the event he did not take up the
position of Head Chef, he would have to bear the early termination fee arising between the
Plaintiff and its employees:

No such communication between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

Dated this 2nd day of October 2015.

Shanice Ang
......................................
Solicitors for the Plaintiff
Ang LLC