Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accy 802 2
Accy 802 2
Now a days, commercial industries are increased in all places. There are many
competitions in all business and firms do not get in equal profit in all period, it may
change in every situation, we cannot predict it. Retail companies like Beacon Lighting
Group Limited (BLX) and VITA Group Consulting (VTG) have facing many problems in
their profits. However, they not only stayed in same progress but also, they increased
their company by more consumers, services, business. The main of this report is to find
out and analyze the financial report of Beacon Lighting Group (BLX) and VITA Group
Consulting for the financial year in 2019. This report will be explained with different
calculation of different ratios and find out, which of these firms has high liquid as well as
find the capital structure and asset management efficiency of these firms. It is also
comparing and identify the firms, which firms is earning more profits in their business
and shows about return on shareholder’s investment, return on assets and capital
expenditure. There a few of the limitations in this report are non-recording of the
intangible assets and it is related on special time and each firms follow various levels of
different accounting, therefore, report of these firms made better challenging and
Vita Group (VTX) is a popular marketing company into three various types and it was
the first firm which was introduced the mobile phone in Australian market, known as
Fone Zone. This firm got more than 120% of presence points in 2019. Vita Group has
and technology, Sprout- Technology accessories, SQD Athletica- Men’s Athletic wear in
2019, these are listed in ASX as Vita Group. Their business sales for the financial year
is $753.7 million and the net profit of VTG had $24.3 million in2019 (Vita Group
VITA Group has a lot of objectives for the financial year of 2020, they increased their
strong decision and communication technology channel, like as Telstra and Sprout.
They decided to increase the company profits and need to improve device and
accessory sales as well services. Sprout has a plan to introduce a new product and rise
their brand awareness (Vita Group Consulting (2020) Annual Report 2019).
Beacon Lighting Group is a famous firm in Australia. They assure the high qualities of
their products and they need the customer satisfaction. This firm always motivates their
employees for getting hire profits. The company maintained the coordination among
employees and give training to the employees efficiently, in the future also it is needed
to maintain to same level (Beacon Lighting Group Limited (2020) Annual Report 2019)
In 2020, this company want to continue the brand and increase the sales and services
of the lighting. This company planned to increase stores in different places in Australia
and in the future, they are thinking to introduce in different countries. It is needed to
bring new and variety models of products. This company want to develop products into
the online markets in 2020 (Beacon Lighting Group Limited (2020) Annual Report
2019).
Financial Ratios
Sr no. Particulars 2019
Turnover
Inventory Turnover 21.688 times
2 Capital Structure
Ratios
Debt Ratio 49.5%
Ratio
3 Asset Management
Efficiency Ratios
Total Asset Turnover 3.518 times
Fixed Asset 31.293 times
Turnover
Equity Multiplier 1.982 times
4 Profitability Ratios
Margin
Net profit Margin 3.221%
Return on Asset 16.058%
1 Liquidity Ratios
Accounts 20.572
receivable
Turnover
Inventory 1.289 times
Turnover
2 Capital Structure
Ratios
Ratio
3 Asset
Management
Efficiency Ratios
Turnover
Fixed Asset 5.389 times
Turnover
Equity Multiplier 1.981 times
4 Profitability
Ratios
Margin
Operating Profit 10.118%
Margin
Net profit Margin 3.186%
Liquidity Ratio
By finding of companies’ liquidity into two ways, by comparing the firms’ current assets
to current liability is needed to calculate the current ratio and quick ratio. On the other
hand, it is researching the time is convenient can convert the liquid assets int cash of
the firm and it is necessary to calculate the account receivable turnover ratio and
inventory turnover ratio. It is discussing the current liquidity ratio compare between with
The calculation data of the current ratio for VITA group is 0.798 and for BLX group is
1.73 in 2019 and the desirable ratio is 1. As the current ratio of the BLX has more than 1
compared with VTG. So, the BLX can solve easily short-term liabilities from their current
assets, because comparison between two companies, BLX group has more current
assets than VTG group therefore, so BLX group can make more liquidity than VTG
group, however there is an issue for BLX, it has more than desirable ratio because if a
company has more than desirable values it is also a problem that means, BLX has more
cash and they are not using efficiently. Therefore, it is needed to check the quick ratio.
The quick ratio of the VTG has 0.548 and the BLX has 0.559, BLX has quicker ratio
than VTG and both have less than desirable ratio, it is a problem to both firms, so it is
The accounts receivable turnover ratio for the VTG has 29.304 and BLX has 20.57
accounts receivable turnover ratio, VTG has more accounts receivable turnover ratio
than BLX. Therefore, it is clearly ratio show VTG can make currents assets into cash
more than BLX. In addition, inventory turnover ratio for VTG has 21.688 times and for
BLX has 1.289 times. When a company has more accounts receivable turnover ratio, it
is better for that firm as well as a company has high inventory turnover ratio that
company gets more cash. However, in this situation BLX has more current ratio and
quick ratio than VTG but BLX has less accounts receivable turnover ratio and inventory
turnover ratio than VTX. By calculating with cash and cash equivalents dividing with
total current assets, which can analyses that firm who has more liquidity, from this
calculation, VTG has 34% liquidity and BLX has 18.064% liquidity. To conclude, VTG
Capital Structure
Capital structure ratio is needed for companies to find the source to buy their assets and
need to repay the interest on the debt by calculating the debt ratio and interest coverage
ratio. On the below, compares the capital structure between VTG firm and BLX firm by
purchased assets. The debt ratio of the VTG has 49.5% and BLX has almost similar
debt ratio. So, it is needed to calculate the interest coverage ratio of both companies,
then it may get the appropriate the calculation to find which firm has more capital
structure. Interest coverage ratio indicates to need to pay the interest of the liability. The
interest coverage ratio of the VTG has 52.719 times and for BLX has 12.729 times, so
VTG has more interest coverage ratio than BLX and from this it is clearly understand
that VTX can get the receivable amount properly from the customers and with this ratio
they utilizes to the debt but BLX cannot get proper amount from the consumers.
Asset management efficiency of the company is used in its assets to raise the sales.
the fixed asset turnover, total asset turnover and the equity multiplier ratios.
Total asset turnover of VTG has 3.518 times and BLX has 1.494 times, VTG has more
total asset turnover than BLX. It is clearly mentioned that VTG can use better efficient
The fixed asset turnover of VTG has 31.293 times and BLX has 5.389 times, it means
VTG has more fixed asset turnover than BLX. Therefore, it is clearly showed that VTG
is properly utilizing its total assets to produce sales more than BLX.
Operating Profitability
A firm’s skill to produce the sales for the expenses can be seen through profitability
ratio. The total expenses of the company’s performances can be do one by using with
profitability ratio. The overall rate of return on the total assets of the firms are available
in return on assets ratio. Therefore, it is needed to calculate the company, how it can be
Return on asset of VTG has 16.58% and BLX has 16.044%, therefore VTG has more
return on asset than BLX because gross profit margin, operating profit margin of BLX
has more than VTG. The return on asset of BLX has very less expensive and BLX is not
utilizing the total asset also BLX has more operating profit margin than VTG. The gross
profit of VTG has 30.472% and BLX has 64.031%, BLX has more gross profit than VTG.
The total asset turnover ratio of VTX has 3.518 times and BLX has 1.494 times,
therefore VTG has greater total asset turnover than BLX. The cost of goods sold of BLX
Investment or return on equity of the company is calculated by using with the net profit
Return on Equity for VTG has 22.23% and BLX has 19.3%, which indicates our
company has a more return on equity than the shareholders of VTG firm as well as net
profit margin of VTX is more than BLX, followed by, total asset turnover and equity
multiplier have almost same situation. Therefore, VTX has higher return on
shareholders’ investment than BLX. Equity multiplier also plays a vital role for borrowing
financed from debt use and helps firms attract the VTG Into More
Capital Expenditure
Capital Expenditure is the equity for a firm to but non-current assets such as property,
plant and equipment comparison between the capital expenditures of VTG and BLX for
this year 2018 and 2019. The capital expenditure of VTG has 16962 in 2019 and in
2018 it has 5563, so the difference of the two period is 16962.The capital expenditure of
BLX has 16147 in 2019 and in 2018 has 29862, so the two different two period is
13715. Therefore, we can understand clearly that VTG has more capital expenditure
than BLX.
conclusion
This report of the VTG and BLX become challenged to conclude. By calculating the
report of Liquid ratio BLX has more than desirable value but VTG has less than
desirable value in the current ratio therefore it is needed to increase the current ratio of
VLG also should reduce the desirable value of the current ratio for BLX. The quick ratio
also same that BLX has more than VLX, in accounts receivable turnover ratio and
Inventory ratio is to be vice versa, The capital structure of VTG has more ratio in debt
ratio and in interest coverage ratio than BLX, there BLX is needed to increase the
capital structure. By calculating the asset management efficiency, VTG has more total
turnover ratio and fixed turnover ratio than BLX. Calculating the returns on
shareholder’s investment, VTG is higher than BLX, therefore it is recommended to
improve in return on investment, net profit margin, total asset turnover and in equity
multiplier. Finally, the calculation of capital expenditure, VTG is greater than BLX. To
conclude overall calculating the ratio VTG is higher than BLX and BLX is needed to