Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSESSMENT IN
LEARNING 2
By:
TESSIE L. DELA CRUZ, Ph.D.
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR V
PREFACE
This module on Assessment in Learning 2 is for the would be teachers in the Teacher
Education Program. This is a three (3) unit Course in the Professional Education Courses-
Pedagogical Content Knowledge offered in the Bachelor in Secondary Education as per
CMO Number 75 series 2017 and Bachelor in Elementary Education as per CMO Number 74
series 2017. This said module is designed in order to easily reach out students as well as
helping them to understand easily each process of learning in this course especially this time
of pandemic.
The module contains eight (8) chapters: Module I Refresh/Recall on Student learning
Outcomes(SLO); Module II Authentic Assessment: Meaning, Characteristics and Principles;
Module III Authentic Assessment Tools; Module IV Process-Oriented Performance –Based
Assessment; Module V-PART I Product-Oriented Performance-Based Assessment; Module
VI- Part II Product-Oriented Performance-Based Assessment; Module VII Assessment in the
Affective Domain; Module VIII Portfolio Assessment Methods; and Module IX Grading &
Reporting (K to 12 Based).
MODULE I
LEARNING CONTENT:
REFRESH/RECALL: STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOME:
3. Good learning outcomes are based on the program mission statement agreed upon by the
program faculty in consultation with other stakeholders like alumni and other professionals. It is
important that the student learning outcomes are based on issuances from the government
regulatory agencies such as DipEd’s K to 12 Law Enhanced Basic Education in the Philippines, the
CHED’s Policies, Standards and Guidelines on Teacher Education, thrusts of appropriate professional
organizations and advocacies of employer and industry groups.
4. Good student learning outcomes are very well understood by both students and faculty. They
should be in agreement on the importance of these competencies which they will cooperatively
develop.
The following are the suggested steps that the teacher and students can together take in their
cooperative monitoring of the progress towards the desired learning outcomes or skills and
competencies.
H ooking the students to the desired learning outcome
E xploring and experiencing the supporting student activities
A pplying the ideas/knowledge required in contrived, simulated or real-life situations
R efining, rehearsing, reviewing the target skills/ competencies
E valuating the degree of learning outcome performance
D eciding on the action, solution or creative project to apply the learning outcome.
5.Good learning outcomes include a spectrum of thinking skills from simple to the higher order of
application of knowledge and skills.
Examples of learning outcomes from the simple to the complex under the competency:
“Ability to understand.”
a.) can identify
b) can explain
c) can apply
d.) can analyse
e.)can synthesize
f.) can evaluate
g) can judge
h) can create
6. Good learning outcomes can offer a timeline for completion of the desired learning.
References:
Cajigal, R.M. (2014). Assessment of Learning.Quezon City: Adriana Publishing Co., Inc.
Hena, L.J (2015).. Classroom Assessment 2.Quezon City: Great Books Trading
Navarro, R.L. et.al. Assessment of Learning 2. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
Santos, R.D. (2007). Advanced Methods in Educational Assessment and Evaluation. Quezon City:
Lorimar Publishing Inc.
INTENDED LEARNING ACTIVITIES:
Topic 1:---------------------------------
Subject: -------------------------------
Topic/Subject Matter: ----------------------
At the end of the lesson, the students should be able to:
SLO#
1:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SLO#
2:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SLO
#3:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Topic
2:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Subject:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Topic/Subject Matter:-----------------------------------------------------------------
At the end of the lesson, the students should be able to:
SLO #
1.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SLO#2.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
SLO#3.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
MODULE II
LEARNING CONTENT:
2. EVALUATION. It involves the task of interpreting, forming conclusions and making judgments
about the information which was gathered in the process of assessment. The data gathered by
assessment are neither useful nor useless but they reflect the learning process. These become
meaningful only when they are processed and interpreted as to how well the students are attaining
their desired competencies. Likewise, EVALUATION occurs when a mark or grade is assigned after a
quiz, a presentation or a completed task.
3. TESTING. It is an instrument of assessment. A test is an instrument tool that reflects the records of
the students’ learning outcomes.
4. MARKS. They are reports of the results of evaluating information obtained in the assessment
process. They have certain components related to the learning activities undertaken by the students.
Examples of components:
30% for quizzes
30% for projects
30% for recitation
10% attendance
B. MEANINGS/ DEFINITIONS OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT:
1. AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT. It is also called PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT or ALTERNATIVE
ASSESSMENT. It is an assessment in which the learner carries out an activity or produces a product in
order to demonstrate their learnings.
2. According to Pearson Education Development Group AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT aims to
evaluate students’ abilities in “real world” context. The students learn to apply their skills to
authentic tasks and projects. It does not encourage rote learning and passive test taking. It focuses
on students’ analytical skills, creativity, written and oral expression skills, ability to integrate what
they learn, and ability to work collaboratively.
3. However, Doran defined AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT as real world situations or context which
generally require a variety of approaches to problem solving and which allow for the possibility that
a problem might have more than one solution.
4. AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT is a form of assessment in which students are asked to perform
real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of essential knowledge and skills (Jon
Mueller, 2011)
5. AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT. It is engaging and worthy problems or questions of importance, in
which students must use knowledge to fashion performances effectively and creatively. The tasks
are either replicas of or analogous to the kinds of problems faced by adult citizens and consumers or
professionals in the field. (Grant Wiggins, 1987).
6. AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT/PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. It calls the examinees to
demonstrate specific skills and competencies in order to apply the skills and knowledge they
mastered. (Richard J. Stiggins)
7. General meaning of AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENTS/PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS. They call
upon the examinee to demonstrate specific skills and competencies like: to apply on their
weaknesses. This result is diminished fear of tests and improvement of self-esteem.
Further, in the teacher-centered activities, AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT/PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT encourages a learner-centered class where the teacher’s major role is TO HELP
STUDENTS ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR LEARNING AND BECOME SELF-EVALUATORS. The
teacher designs activities and evaluates results which provide information needed for monitoring
students’ progress and evaluating the teacher’s strategies.
In like manner, AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT focuses on the analytical and creative thinking skills,
students to work cooperatively and collaboratively and performance skills (process of product) that
reflect student learning, student achievement, and student attitudes of relevant activities.
The said 5 phases of AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT are illustrated in the diagram below:
Phase I Phase II
Identify learner outcome Determine criteria and acceptable
evidences of performance
Phase IV
Implement assessment strategies
2. THE TABLE BELOW SHOWS THE BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRADITIONAL ASSESSMENT AND
AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT:
LEARNING CONTENT:
MODES OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT
AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT TOOLS
1. Observations. They include date and information that the teacher collects from daily work with
students.
2. Performance samples. They are tangible results that demonstrate student achievements.
3. Actual Performance. They are tests and measures of student’s actual performance at a specified
place and time.
B. OBSERVATIONS-BASED ASSESSMENT TOOLS:
Guidelines to make observation-based assessment systematic and objective (Diane Hart, 1994)
1. Observe not only one (1) but all the students.
2. Observation must be as frequent and as regular as possible.
3. Observations must be recorded in writing.
4. Observations should cover both routine and exceptional occurrences.
5. Reliability of observation records is enhanced if multiple observations are gathered and
synthesized.
Oral Communications
Written Communications
Attributes Rating 5 4 3 2 1
1. Clarity of presentation
2. Opportunity for class interaction
3. Organization
4. Grammar and syntax
5. Provision of summary
TOTAL: -------------------------------------------------------
B. THE INTERVIEW SHEET. This is another OBSERVATION TOOL which is also called the CONFERENCE
RECORDING FORM. Interview sheets consist of a list of questions the teacher intends to ask and space for
recording the students’ answers
Interviewer’s Name---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Course/Subject---------------------------------------------------------------
Topic---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Academic Competencies
1. can understand printed materials
2. can use research and library skills
3. can use technology in preparing oral presentation
4. can use scientific method in solving problems
5. can write and speak effectively in English and Filipino
Personal Management Competencies
1. attends school work daily punctually
2. meets school deadlines
3. knows personal strengths and weaknesses
4. demonstrates self-control
5. can follow oral and written instructions
6. can work without supervision
7. can learn new skills
Team Work Competencies
BEHAVIOR:
------------1. Identifies the given information
------------2. Identifies what is being asked
------------3. Uses variables to replace the unknown
----------- 4. Formulates the equation
---------- 5. Performs algebraic operations
------------6. Obtains an answer
----------- 7. Verifies if the answer is correct
ORAL QUESTIONING. This is an appropriate assessment method for actual performance if the objectives:
1. To assess the student’s stock knowledge and /or
2. To determine the student’s ability to communicate ideas in coherent verbal sentences.
References:
Cajigal. R.M. et.al.(2014). Assessment of Learning 2. Quezon City: Adriana Publishing Co., Inc.
Hena, L.J. (2015). Classroom Assessment 2.Quezon City: Great Books Trading
Navarro, R.L. et.al.92013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes.Quezon City:
Lorimar Publishing Inc.
Santos, R.D. (2007). Advanced Methods in Educational Assessment and Evaluation; Assessment of Learning 2
Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
Name: ------------------------------------ Course: ---------------- Name of Instructor/Professor:
---------------
DATE: -------------------------------------
LEARNING CONTENT:
D. SCORING RUBRICS
A rubric is a general scoring guide that describes the level at which a student performs a process
or a product. The students themselves are involved in the assessment process through both peer
and self-assessment.
Further, rubric is a scoring scale used to assess student performance along a task-specific set of
criteria. Authentic assessments are criterion-referenced measures whereby students’ aptitudes on
tasks are determined by matching the students’ performances against a set of criteria to determine
the degree to which the students’ performances meet the criteria for the task.
To measure student performance against a predetermine set of criteria, a RUBRIC or SCORING
SCALE, must be created containing the important criteria for the task and appropriate levels of
performance, for each criterion .
Example: Rubric/Scoring scale on RECITATION, task in English.
Explanation: The rubric consists of two components: Criteria and levels of performance
The criteria, characteristics of good performance on a task, are listed at the left hand column in the
illustrated rubric (number of hand gestures, appropriate facial features, voice inflection and
ambiance)
For each criterion, the evaluator who will apply the rubric can determine to what degree the student
has met the criterion, the level of performance.
The given rubric, there are three levels of performance for each criterion. The recitation can contain
lots of inappropriate, few inappropriate or no inappropriate hand gestures.
The rubric contains a mechanism for assigning a score to each project.(Assessments and their
accompanying rubrics can be used for purposes other than evaluation and thus, do not have to have
points or grades attached to them.)
In the second column –to left column a weight is assigned each criterion. The students can receive 3,
6, or 9 points(i. e. 1, 2, 3 times 3)for the level of appropriateness in this task.
D.1 DESCRIPTORS
Descriptors spell out what is expected of students at each level of performance for each
criterion. Basing from the examples “LOTS OF INAPPROPRIATE FACIAL EXPRESSIONS”, “MONOTONE
VOICE USED” are descriptors.
Moreover, a DESCRIPTOR tells students more precisely what performance looks like at each level
and how their work may be distinguished from the work of others for each criterion. Likewise, the
descriptors help the teacher more precisely and consistently distinguish between student work.
In summing up, the rubric includes another common but not necessary, component of
rubrics-------DESCRIPTORS
1. ANALYTIC RUBRIC. An analytic rubric articulates levels of performance for each criterion; the
teacher can assess student performance for each criterion. Furthermore, analytic rubric requires the
teacher to list and identify the major knowledge and skills which are critical in the development of
process or products tasks. Teachers can assess easily the specific concept, understanding, skills or
products with a separate component. Each criterion for this kind of rubric receives a separate score,
thus providing a better diagnostic information and feedback for the students as a form of formative
assessment.
Using the RECITATION RUBRIC, a teacher could assess whether a student has done a POOR, GOOD
OR EXCELLENT JOB OF “CREATING AMBIANCE” and distinguish that from how well the student did on
“VOICE INFLECTION.”
2. HOLISTIC RUBRIC. A holistic rubric does not list separate levels of performance for each criterion.
A holistic rubric assigns a level of performance by assessing performance across multiple criteria as a
whole. Moreover, holistic rubric requires the teacher to make a judgment about the overall quality
of each student response. Each category of the scale contains several criteria which shall be given a
single score that gives an overall rating. This provides a reasonable summary of rating in which traits
are efficiently combined, scored quickly and with only one score, limiting the precision of assessment
of the results and providing little specific information about the performance of the students and
what needs for further improvement.
Example: the example used in the analytic rubric can be turned into holistic rubric:
3- EXCELLENT SPEAKER
. included 10-12 changes in hand gestures
. no apparent inappropriate facial expressions
. utilized proper voice inflection
. can create proper ambiance for the poem
2- Good Speaker
. included 5-9 changes in hand gestures
. few in appropriation facial expressions
. had some inappropriate voice inflection changes
. almost creating proper ambiance
1- Poor Speaker
. included 1-4 changes in hand gestures
. lots of inappropriate facial expressions
. used monotone voice
. did not create proper ambiance
ASSESSMENT SCALE
EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD FAIR POOR
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Criteria:
1. Degree to which the report
reflects the objectives of the
research
2. Level of creativity
3. Clarity
4. Visual Appeal
5. Level of Effort
TOTAL: --------Scoring:
SCORING: 20 % above---Most Acceptable
15-19---------Very Acceptable
10-14--------Acceptable
5-9----------Barely Acceptable
Below 5---Unacceptable
ANALYTIC RUBRICS are more common because teachers typically want to assess each criterion
separately, specifically for assignments that involve a larger number of criteria. It becomes more and
more difficult to assign a level of performance in a holistic rubric as the number of criteria it
becomes more difficult to assign an appropriate holistic category to the performance. An analytic
rubric better handles weighting of criteria.
F.2 WHEN TO CHOOSE A HOLISTIC RUBRIC
Holistic rubric tends to be used when a quick or gross judgment needs to be made. If the
assessment is a minor one, such as a brief homework assignment it may be sufficient to apply a
holistic judgment (e.g. check, Scheck-plus, or no-check) to quickly review student work. But holistic
rubrics can also be employed for more substantial assignments. It is not easy to evaluate
performance on one criterion independently of performance on a different criterion.
Example: Many writing rubrics are holistic because it is not always easy to disentangle clarity from
organization or content from presentation. Some educators believe a holistic or global assessment of
student performance better captures student ability on certain tasks. Alternately if two criteria are
nearly inseparable, the combination of the two can be treated as a simple criterion in an analytic
rubric. `
2. You may expand the number of levels of performance to include: NEVER, RARELY, SOMETIMES,
USUALLY, & ALWAYS.
Makes eye contact
never rarely sometimes usually always
3. There is no “right” answer as to how many levels of performance there should be for a criterion in
an analytic rubric, that will depend on the nature of the task assigned, the criteria being evaluated,
the students involved and your purposes and preferences, hence, a teacher might decide to leave off
the “always” level in the above rubric because “usually” is as much as normally can be expected or
even wanted in some instances. Thus, the “makes eye contact” portion of the rubric for that teacher
might be:
Makes eye contact
never rarely sometimes usually
** Some authors recommend the following fewer levels of performance be included initially:
1. easier and quicker to administer
2. easier to explain to students (and others)
3. easier to expand than larger rubrics to shrink
----- 2. They are concerned with the process for the actual task performance.
a. process-oriented performance-based assessment
b. product-oriented performance-based assessment
c. process-oriented performance-based learning competencies
d. both a & c
------- 3. In the process-oriented assessment, the learning competencies should start from a general
statement then
a. breaks down to difficult behaviour.
b. breaks down to easily observable behaviour.
c. breaks down to observable behavior
d. breaks down to average observable behavior
-----4. The role of the teacher in the process-oriented performance assessment is
a. to see to it that the specific learning tasks clearly define the specific skills and abilities needed
b.to see to it that the specific learning tasks clearly define the specific competencies
c. to see to it that the specific learning task define the specific abilities of the students
d. to see to it that the specific learning task define the particular skills.
-----5. A scoring scale which is used to assess student performance along a task-specific set of
criteria.
a. rubric b. task designing c. scoring rubric d. performance task
-----6. It articulates levels of performance for each criterion.
a. rubric b. analytic rubric c. holistic rubric d. scoring rubric
-----7. It assigns a level of performance by assessing performance across multiple criteria.
a. rubric b. analytic rubric c. holistic rubric d. scoring rubric
-----8. They spell out what is expected of students at each level of performance for each criterion.
a. descriptors b. rubrics c. tasks designing d. task performances
-----9.”Preparing a power point presentation” is an example of
a. process-oriented performance- based assessment
b. product-oriented performance-based assessment
c. performance-based assessment
d. product-performance-based assessment
-----10. Which of these activities belong to the process-oriented performance-based assessment?
a. Gymnastics
b. Operating a computer
c. Mathematical Investigations
d. All of the above
b. Given the task below, identify at least three (3) process-oriented learning competencies.
1. Write an outline of an oral report.
c. Design one (1) learning task with a corresponding analytic rubric and holistic rubric as well for a
process-oriented learning competency in your field of interest.
Module V
LEARNING CONTENT:
PART I. PRODUCT-ORIENTED PERFORMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT:
A. PRODUCT-ORIENTED LEARNING COMPETENCIES
B. TASK DESIGNING
Examples: a.The desired product is a representation of a cubic prism made out of cardboard in a
Geometry class.
Learning Competencies: The final product submitted by the students must:
1. possess the correct dimensions (5” x 5 “ x 5”)- (minimum specifications/beginner)
2. be sturdy, made of durable cardboard and properly fastened together ( fastened together- (skilled
specifications)
3. be pleasing to the observer, preferably properly colored for aesthetic purposes – (expert level)
b. The product desired is a scrapbook illustrating the historical event called EDSA I PEOPLE POWER.
Learning competencies: the scrapbook presented by the students must:
1. contain pictures, newspaper clippings and other illustrations for the main characters of EDSA I
People Power namely: Corazon Aquino, Fidel V. Ramos, Juan Ponce Enrile, Ferdinand E. Marcos,
Cardinal Sin._(minimum specifications/beginner)
2. contain remarks and captions for the illustrations made by the student himself for the roles played
by the characters of EDSA I People power-(Skilled Level)
3. be presentable. complete, informative and pleasing to the reader of the scrapbook-(Expert level)
PERFORMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT FOR PRODUCTS AND PROJECTS can be used for assessing
outputs of short-term tasks such as the one illustrated, outputs in a typing class
c. Example: The desired output consists of the output in a typing class.
Learning Competencies: The final typing outputs of the students must:
1. possess no more than five (5) errors in spelling- (beginner/minimum)
2. possess no more than 5 errors in spelling while observing proper format based on the document
to be typewritten—(skilled level)
3. possess no more than 5 errors in spelling, has the proper format, and is readable and
presentable ---- (Expert level)
*** All the examples given are evidenced based. The teacher needs concrete evidence that the
student has achieved a certain level of competence based on submitted products and projects.
C. TASK DESIGNING
The design of the learning task depends on the projects required by the teacher. Projects or
other required outputs should reinforce students’ leaning not merely a submission of the
requirements.
Example: The students are expected to conduct an investigatory project. The students should be
given enough time to do the investigatory research which is to be defended orally and a report of
the investigation should be submitted.
Moreover, the concepts that may be associated with TASK DESIGNING NAMELY:
1. Complexity. The level of complexity of the project needs to be within the range of ability of the
students. Projects that are too simple tend to be uninteresting for the students while projects that
are too complicated will most likely frustrate them.
2. Appeal. The project or activity must be appealing to the students. It should be interesting enough
so that students are encouraged to pursue the task to completion. It should lead to self-descovery of
information by the students.
3. Creativity. The project needs to encourage students to exercise creativity and divergent thinking.
Given the same set of materials and project inputs, how does one best present the project? It should
lead the students into exploring the various possible ways of presenting the final output.
4. Goal-Based. The teacher must bear in mind that the project is produced in order to attain a
leaning outcome. Thus, projects are assigned to students not just for the sake of producing
something but for the purpose of reinforcing learning.
Example:
Paper folding is a traditional Japanese art. It can be used as an activity to teach the concept the
concept of plane and solid figures in Geometry Provide the students with a given number of colored
papers and ask them to construct as many plane and solid figures from these papers without cutting
them(by paper folding only)
D.ASSESSMENT TASKS:
1. What is product-oriented performance-based assessment?
2. Explain product-oriented learning competencies.
3. Give examples of the three levels of targets on product-oriented learning competencies
4. Explain the following concepts in task designing.
4.1 complexity
4.2 appeal
4.3 creativity
4.4 goal-based
LEARNING CONTENT:
1. Flow in thought
2.Graphical presentations
3.Grammar/mechanics
. Inadequate
. There appears to be no organization of the document’s contents.
. Sentences are difficult to read and understand
Explanation: Each score category describes the characteristics of a response that would receive the
respective score. Describing the characteristics of responses within each score category increases the
likelihood that two independent evaluators would assign the same score to a given response. With this, it
increases the OBJECTIVITY of the ASSESSMENT procedure using RUBRICS.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE- This an ANALYTIC RUBRIC IN THE PRODUCT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
SCALE
4 3 2 1 Points
Earned
Category
A. Understanding the Identified special Understands Understood Did not
problem factors that the problem enough to understand
influenced the solve part of enough to get
approach before the problem or started or
starting the to get part of make progress
problem the solution
B How students solve Approach was Approach Approach Approach did
the problem efficient would work for would only not work
sophisticated the problem. lead to solving identification of
clear evidence of Evidence or part of the some of the
doing purposeful doing problem. Some important
mathematical purposeful aspects of elements of the
investigations mathematical investigation task but
investigation required by assumptions
the task are about some of
missing the elements
are flawed
C. Decision along the Clearly explained Did not clearly Only partly No reasoning is
way reasons for the explain the correct evident from
correct decisions reason for reasoning or the work or
made throughout decisions but correct reasoning is
the problem. work suggests reasoning used incorrect-
Uses a high level correct for only part of inadequate
mathematical reasoning used the problem- mathematical
thinking. for only part of occasional thinking that
the problem- evidence of includes
evidence mathematical ineffective
mathematical thinking. analytical
thinking. procedures.
D. Outcomes of Solved the Solved the Only partly No attempts to
Activities problem and problem and correct-solved solve the
made general connected the the problem or problem justify
rule about the solution to solved the results. It
solution to a other math or problem partly attempts is
more described its correct made it is
complicated use for what unrelated to
situation was learned in the task.
the real world.
E. Communications Clear, effective Clear Incomplete, Explanation
and detailed explanation, explanation. cannot be
explanation on appropriate Not clearly understood
how the problem used of presented. unrelated to
was solved. All of accurate Some use of the problem.
those steps are mathematical appropriate Mostly
included so that representation, mathematical inappropriate
the reader does effective use of Representation use of
not need to infer mathematical terminology mathematical
how and why technology and and notation presentation
decisions were notation terminology
made. and notation
Mathematical
representation is
actively used as a
means of
communication-
ideas related to
the solution of
the problem.
There is precise
and appropriate
use of
mathematical
technology.
ASSESSMENT TASKS:
Direction: Answer the following questions:
1. What is scoring rubric? Explain.
2. Differentiate between a “general” and “specific” task oriented scoring rubrics.
3. What factors determine the use of scoring rubrics over other authentic assessment procedures? Explain.
4. Identify and describe the process of developing scoring rubrics for product-oriented performance-based
assessment.
LEARNING CONTENT:
ASSESSMENT IN THE AFFECTIVE DOMAIN
A. THE TAXONOMY IN THE AFFECTIVE DOMAIN
B. AFFECTIVE LEARNING COMPETENCIES
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of the module you are expected to:
1. gain understanding on the concepts of assessment in the affective domain namely:
1.1 Taxonomy in the Affective Domain
1.2 affective learning competencies
2. explain the different levels of the Taxonomy in affective domain
3. Identify and explain the focal concepts of learning competencies
4. Identify and explain the need theories on motivation: MASLOW, HERSBERG AND ERG
5.Construct learning objectives/outcomes in the affective domain.
LEARNING CONTENT:
LEARNING IN THE AFFECTIVE DOMAIN IS ASSESSED AND MEASURED IN SCHOOLS BUT NOT USED AS GRADE OF
STUDENTS IN THIS DOMAIN.
E. IN THE AFFECTIVE DOMAIN, LEARNING COMPETENCIES CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING FOCAL CONCEPTS:
a. ATTITUDES. They are mental predisposition to act that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with
some degree of favour or disfavour. Individuals generally have attitudes that focus on objects, people or
institutions. Attitudes are attached to mental categories. Mental orientations towards concepts are generally
referred to as VALUES.
ATTITUDES COMPRISE FOUR COMPONENTS:
1. COGNITIONS. They are our beliefs, theories, expectancies, cause and effect beliefs, and perceptions relative
to the focal object. This concept is not the same as “feelings” but just a statement of beliefs and expectations
which vary from one individual to the next.
2. AFFECT. The affective component refers to our feeling with respect to the focal object such as fear, liking,
or anger.
For instance, the color “blue” evokes different feelings for different individuals: some like the color blue but
others do not. Some associate the color blue with “loneliness” while others associate it with “calm and peace”.
3. BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS. They are our goals, aspirations, and our expected responses to the attitude
object.
4. EVALUATION. They are considered the central component of attitudes. Evaluations consist of the
imputation of some degree of goodness or badness to an attitude object. When we speak of a positive or
negative attitude toward an object, this refers to the evaluative component.
EVALUATIONS ARE FUNCTIONS OF COGNITIVE, AFFECT AND BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS OF THE OBJECT. It is
most often the EVALUATION that is stored in memory, often without the corresponding cognitions and affect
that were responsible for its formation.
WHY STUDY ATTITUDES?
ATTITUDES can influence the way an individual acts and thinks in the social communities she belongs.
ATTITUDES can function as frameworks and references for forming conclusions and interpreting or acting for
or against an individual; individuals, concept or an idea.
Example: Poor performance in school mathematics cannot be strictly attributable to differential mental
abilities but to the students’ attitudes toward the subject. When mathematics classes are recited, students
with negative attitude towards mathematics tend to pay less attention and occupy their minds with something
else. With this, ATTITUDES may influence behaviour. People will behave in ways consistent with their attitudes.
b. MOTIVATION. It is a reason or set or reasons for engaging in a particular behaviour, especially human
behaviour as studied in psychology and neuropsychology. The reasons may include basic needs ( food, water
& shelter) or an object, goal, state of being, or ideal that is desirable, which may or may not be viewed as
“positive” such as seeking a state of being in which pain is absent.
The motivation for a behavior may also be attributed to less-apparent reasons such as altruism or morality.
According to Geen (1995) MOTIVATION refers to the initiation, direction, intensity and persistence of human
behavior.
Moreover, MASLOW’S hierarchy of human needs theory is the most discussed theory of motivation
THE THEORY IS SUMMARIZED:
Human beings have wants and desires which influence their behaviour;only unsatisfied needs can
influence behavior, satisfied needs cannot.
Since needs are many, they are arranged in order of importance, from the basic to the complex
The person advances to the next level of needs only after the lower level need is at least minimally
satisfied.
The further the progress up the hierarchy, the more individuality, humanness and psychological
health a person will show.
THE NEEDS, LISTED FROM THE BASIC (LOWEST, EARLIEST) TO MOST COMPLEX (HIGHEST, Latest) are
as follows:
. Physiological: food, clothing, shelter
. Safety and Security: home and family
. Social: being in a community
. Self-esteem: Self-understanding, self-acceptance
. Self-actualization: recognition, achievement
FREDERICK HERZBERG’s TWO FACTOR THEORY IS ANOTHER NEED THEORY OF MOTIVATION. This
theory concludes that certain factors in the workplace result in JOB SATISFACTION while others do
not, but if absent lead to dissatisfaction. He distinguished between:
.MOTIVATORS: (like: challenging work, recognition, responsibility (which give positive satisfaction
. HYGIENE FACTORS: (like: status, job security, salary and fringe benefits) which do not motivate if
present, but if absent will result in demotivation.
The theory is also called the “Motivator-Hygiene Theory, this theory is more powerful than Maslow’s
theory due to its concepts are simpler to understand.
Moreover, STEVE BICKNELL did considerable research into EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT DATA. The
analysis of verbatim comments from over 50 companies was found out that there was a common
theme between LOW HYGIENE-HIGH MOTIVATOR AN DLOW EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. Hence,
employees consistently recorded low scores against management/leadership. Employees were
optimistic about success but happy to complain about leadership since their hygiene then drive
MOTIVATION.
CLAYTON ALDEFER created the expansion of MASLOW’S HERARCHY OF NEEDS leading to ERG THEORY
(EXISTENCE, RELATEDNESS AND GROWTH).
Physiological and safety-the lower needs are placed in the existence category.
Love and self-esteem needs in the relatedness category.
The growth category contains the SELF ACTUALIZATION and SELF ESTEEM needs
MOTIVATION IN EDUCATION CAN HAVE SEVERAL EFFECTS ON HOW STUDENTS LEARN AND THEIR
BEHAVIOR TOWARDS SUBJECT MATTER (ORMROD, 2003) It can:
1. direct behaviour toward particular goals.
2. lead to increase effort and energy.
3. increase initiation of, and persistence in activities
4. enhance cognitive processing.
5. determine what consequences are reinforcing.
6. lead to improve performance.
Students are not always internally motivated; they sometimes need situated motivation which is
found in environmental conditions that the teacher creates.
LEARNING CONTENT:
PERSONALITY
1. Pleasing 5 4 3 2 1 Domineering or aggressive, weak
Nervous in class
VOICE
3. Well-modulated 5 4 3 2 1 Inaudible/can
hardly be heard
DICTION
4. Very Good 5 4 3 2 1 Noticeably poor
COMMUNICATION SKILL
5. Formulates and 5 4 3 2 1 Poor in
Communicates communicating
Thoughts clearly ideas
ORGANIZATION OF LESSONS
9. Highly organized, 5 4 3 2 1 Disorganized,
Follows an outline jumps from
one topic
to one another,
unprepared
DELIVERY OF LECTURES
10. Stimulating 5 4 3 2 1 Dull. Boring
CLARITY OF EXPLANATION
11. Explanation easily 5 4 3 2 1 apparently
understood by explains, confines
students students
However, LIKERT (1935) developed the method of summated ratings (LIKERT SCALES) which is still widely
used. The LIKERT SCALES require that individuals tick on a box to report whether they “strongly agree”,
“agree” are “undecided,” “disagree,” or “strongly disagree” in response to a large number of items concerning
an attitude object or stimulus.
LIKERT SCALES ARE DERIVED AS FOLLOWS:
FIRST, you pick individual items to include. You choose individual items that you know correlate highly with the
total score across items.
SECOND, you choose how to scale each item. Example: you construct labels for each scale value (e.g., 1 to 11)
to represent the interpretation to be assigned to the number (e.g. disagree strongly=1, disagree slightly=2,
etc.)
THIRD, you ask your target audience to mark each item.
FOURTH, you derive a target’s score by adding the values that target identified on each item.
Below is an example of the use of a LIKERT Scale:
Statement: I do not like to solve algebraic equations.
Response options:
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Agree
4. Strongly Agree
It is common to treat the numbers obtained from a rating scale directly as measurements by
calculating averages, or more generally any arithmetic options.
Furthermore in a LIKERT SCALE, the students are asked to rate their agreement or disagreement on a
statement.
Example: CHEMISTRY ATTITUDE INVENTORY
DIRECTIONS: Below are statements that describe student’s feelings toward chemistry. Please answer them by
checking the appropriate column which you think accurately describes your reachtion as each statement
applies to you in chemistry.
Please answer all items.
5----- SA---- Strongly Agree
4-----A------Agree
3----- U----Undecided
2---- D----Disagree
1----SD----Strongly Disagree
STATEMENTS 5 4 3 2 1
SA A U D SD
1. I find Chemistry interesting.
2. I believe that Chemistry is one of the most useful subject.
3. Chemistry topic challenges me to more about the subject.
4. Knowledge of Chemistry is useful in our lives.
5. I do not see any value in Chemistry.
6. I find Chemistry dry and boring.
7. I like studying chemistry more than any other academic
subjects.
8. Chemistry lessons confuse me.
9. I feel that I have a good foundation in Chemistry.
10. I spend less time for my Chemistry lessons than for any
other lessons.
11. I easily give up solving Chemistry problems.
12. I feel that I am being forced to study Chemistry.
13. I feel nervous every time I am in my Chemistry class.
14. Chemistry involves too much memorizing.
15. I enjoy solving Chemistry problems.
16. Chemistry is one of my favourite subjects.
17. I find Chemistry a difficult subject.
18. I believe that I can effectively practice my profession
without taking Chemistry in college.
19. I find it important that every college student should take
Chemistry.
20. I am interested in reading books, magazines and other
materials related to Chemistry.
6. JOURNALS
Journals can be used for student reflection. The students write about topics that are important to the
course. The students become more independent in their thinking; feedback from the teacher becomes less
important. The journal becomes a tool from self-monitoring. The journal allows students to voice ideas,
concerns and opinions. They stimulate a written conversation between student and teacher or student and
student.
7. REFLECTION PAPER
A reflection paper can be written on an assigned piece of reading, a lecture or an experience, such as an
internship or volunteer experience. A reflection paper will be further clarified by the teacher or professor who
assigns it to you. A reflection paper cites reactions, feelings and analysis of an experience in a more personal
way than in a formal research or analytical essay.
When writing a reflection letter on literature or another experience, the point is to include your thoughts
and reactions to the reading or experience. You can present your feelings on what you read and explain them.
You can also use a reflection paper to analyse what you have read. Like any other paper or essay, it should be
cohesive and refer directly to the specific passage or quote in the material that inspired this feeling. You can
include personal experience in a reflection paper, but do not depend on it; base your reactions and reflections
on the materials that is your subject.
1. DO NOT SUMMARIZE. Do not use a reflection paper simply to summarize what you have read or done. A
reflection paper should not be a free flow of ideas and thoughts. The idea of a reflection paper is to write an
essay describing your reactions and analysis to a reading or other experience; however, it is more formal than
a journal entry, so leave out informal language and form.
2. ORGANIZE YOUR THOUGHTS. A reflection paper should be as organized as any other type of formal
essay. Include an introduction, perhaps one that describes your expectations before the reading or the
experience. You also may want to summarize the conclusions you made during the process.
The body of the paper should explain the conclusions you have come to and why, basing your conclusions in
concrete details from your reading and experience. End the paper with a conclusion that sums up what you got
from the reading. You might want to refer to your conclusions in relation to your expectations or come to
some other conclusion or analysis about the text or experience in light of your feelings and reactions.
ASSESSMENT TASKS:
DIRECTION: Answer the following questions:
1. Identify and explain the various types of rating scales.
2. What should such a self-report essentially contain? Explain.
3.What is the difference between a Turnstone scale and a Likert Scale?
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of the module you are expected to:
1. gain understanding on the concept of portfolio and portfolio assessment.
2. Identify and explain the several features and characteristics of portfolio assessment.
3. Enumerate and explain the purposes of portfolio assessment.
4. Give and explain the distinct elements and components of portfolio.
5. Construct a portfolio cover.
F.. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF PORTFOLIO WHICH ARE EXPECTED AND INCLUDED FROM THE OUTPUTS OF
STUDENTS:
1. COVER SHEET. This creatively includes the nature of the student’s (or group’s) work and could be in a form
of a letter. It also reflects the progress of the learners as it summarizes the evidence of students’ learning and
progress.
Example of a portfolio cover sheet.
FINAL PORTFOLIO
Name/Group:------------------------------------------------------ Date:--------------------------------
Grade/Year Level :--------------------------------------------- Section:-------------------------
Subject/Course:---------------------------------
Purpose:--------------------------------------------------
Type of Portfolio:------------------------------------------------------------
Recommendations:
2. Table of Contents. This includes the title of each work sample and its page number.
3. Work Samples. These are entries which are to be included in the portfolio which can be categorized as core
(samples which are needed to include) and optional (students preference on what to include). The core are the
basic elements required for each student and serves as basis for decision in assessing the students’ work. The
optional entries allow the folder to represent creativity and uniqueness of each student. In the introduction of
the work samples, it is a must to include the rationale, explaining what work samples are included, why each
one is significant, and how they all fit together in a holistic view of the students, (or group’s work).
4. Dates of all sample works to facilitate evidence of growth overtime.
5. Drafts of the written products, or even the seminal attempts in writing the write ups for the portfolio and
the revised version based on the corrected versions.
6. Self-Assessment. This is written by the student or the group members which could be in terms of self-
reflection and analysis or a form of insights. Teacher may include questions which can facilitate the assessment
of the students.
7. Future goals. This is based on the students’ (or group’s) current achievements, interests, and progress.
8. Other’s comments and assessments. This may came from the teacher, cooperative learning groups, and
other interested parties such as the parents.
ASSESSMENT TASKS::
A. Direction: Select the letter of the best answer then write your answer on the space provided for:
-------------1.A planned collection of learner achievement that documents what a student ha saccomplished and
the steps taken to get there.
a. portfolio b. rating scale c. portfolio assessment d. Likert scale.
-------------2. An evaluation tool to document learning of students.
a. portfolio b. rating scale c. portfolio assessment d. Likert scale
-------------3. A portfolio is a form of assessment that students and teachers do altogether. This means that
a. both students and teachers are involved in the evaluation of the portfolio.
b. the students are involved only in the evaluation of the portfolio.
c. the teachers are involved only in the evaluation of the portfolio.
d. the parents are involved in the evaluation of students’ portfolio.
---------------4.It includes the title and page number of the portfolio.
a. cover sheet b. table of contents c. work samples d. dates
--------------5.It includes questions which can facilitate the assessment of the students.
a. self-assessment b. drafts c. work samples d. table of contents
B. DIRECTION: Using the template provided, select one (10) topic of interest and construct a portfolio cover
sheet.
1. Things I learned from Values Education
2. My Science Journey
MY PORTFOLIO: ----------------------------------------------------
Name/Group:------------------------------- Time/Frame:----------------------------------------
Grade/Year Level:-----------------------------Subject(s)/Course(s):---------------------
Purpose:
What will be included in the portfolio?
Suggested Future Goals:
Module X
LEARNING CONTENT:
PART II- PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT
E.2 BELOW IS AN EXAMPLE OF ASSESSING READING SKILLS PERFORMANCE which shows the alignment of
teaching and learning goal, activities and assessment task which includes portfolio evidence.
E.3
EXAMPLES OF ARTIFACTS FOR PORTFOLIOS BY SUBJECT AREA
Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies
Favorite poems, song, Solution to an open- Prediction based on prior Presentation of a view of
letter ended question knowledge society
Finished samples of Graphs, histographs Data tables Written descriptions of
different writing genres, different cultures,
persuasive, letters, institutions,professions
poetry, information,
stories
Finished writings drawn Geometric shapes Concept Maps Discussion of equality,
from other subject areas justice, democracy,
freedom, rights, and
other large social
concepts
Literature extensions: Examples of perimeter, Drawing to scale Drawings of artifacts
scripts for drama, visual area, cubic space
arts, webs, charts,
timelines, murals
Audiotape of readings Problem made up by Graphs, inferences, Timelines
student to display a conclusions based on
concept data
Notes from individual Models, photo showing Diagrams, charts, Examples of constitutions
reading and research use of manipulatives interpretation of trends and civic responsibilities
Writing responses that Written discussion of Written discussions of Position paper on a social
illustrate critical and Mathematical concepts science concepts issue
creative thinking
Writing responses to Statistical manipulation Inquiry designs Investigation of social
literacy components: of data issue
plot, setting, point of
view, character
development, links to
life, theme criticism
Items with evidence of Description of Science-technology- Family shield and
style, organization, voice, mathematical concepts society connections explanations of symbols
clarity found in the physical
world
Evidence of effort-first Papers showing Example of science Proposal to respond to a
drafts, second drafts, correction to misconception that is social problem
finished drafts mathematical errors corrected
E.4 The teacher is responsible to ensure the reliability and high quality of scoring criteria. The students should
be informed also on how you will evaluate your portfolios. This can be done by sharing the scoring criteria with
the students so that they can ask questions, give their suggestions and insights. The table below suggests
example of Mathematics portfolio under the content of PROBLEM SOLVING.
3. What do you like best about how you solved in this problem?--------------------------------------------------------------
4.How will you improve your problem-solving skill on the next problem?
4. Communication
Rating Description
5 Gives a complete response with clear; unambiguous explanation; includes diagrams and charts
when they help clarify explanation; presents strong arguments that are logically developed.
4 Gives good response with fairly clear explanations, which includes some use of diagrams and
charts; presents good arguments that are mostly but not always logically developed.
3 Explanations and descriptions of problem solution are somewhat clear but incomplete; make use
of diagrams and examples to clarify points but arguments are incomplete.
2 Explanations and descriptions of problems are weak; makes little, if any, use of diagrams and
Examples to clarify points; arguments are seriously flawed.
1 Ineffective communication; Diagrams misinterpret the problem; arguments have no sound
premise.
Sum of Ratings: ---------------------------
Average of Ratings: -----------------------------------
Comments:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In evaluating scoring criteria, the rubrics available must be consistent with the purpose of the portfolio and
with the overall curriculum framework. Reliability must be considered as well, to give the same results for the
same students when applied by different teachers.
F. STUDENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES
The main philosophy embedded in portfolio assessment is SHARED AND ACTIVE ASSESSMENT. The teacher
must have short individual meetings with each student, in which progress is discussed and goals are set for a
future meeting. Throughout the process, the student and the teacher keep careful documentation of the
meetings noting the significant agreements and findings in each individual session. Through meetings of this
kind, the formative evaluation process for portfolio assessment is facilitated. The use of portfolio assessment
takes time but in the end, the gains are well worth the time and effort expended by the teacher.
Finally, student-teacher conferences can also be used for summative evaluation purposes when the student
presents his final portfolio product and where final grades are determined together with the teacher. Even at
this stage of the process, students can negotiate for the appropriate grade to be given using as evidence the
minutes of the regular student-teacher conferences. It is for this reason that notes from these conferences
have to be included in the portfolio as they contain joint decisions about the individual’s strengths and
weaknesses. These conferences can be prepared for in pairs, when students practice presenting their
portfolios.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES:
DO THESE: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING.
1. Identify and explain in implementing the stages of portfolio assessment.
2. What are the five types of portfolio? Explain.
3. Give the importance of student-teacher conferences? Discuss its importance in relation to
portfolio assessment.
4. What is the main philosophy behind portfolio assessment? Explain this basic philosophy.
5. How does portfolio assessment differ from traditional testing and from other authentic
assessment methods?
ASSESSMENT TASKS:
a. Discuss the concepts of designing and evaluating portfolio assessment in the following situations.
1. As a Grade 6 teacher; Ms. A has decided to implement a Science Portfolio in her class. She believes
that portfolio increases students’ learning and encourages students to become more reflective
learner and develops skills in evaluating strengths and weaknesses of their work. She provides clear
books for the students and tells them that they need to put all their activities and examinations in it.
Moreover, she kept on reminding her students that they will discuss the content of the portfolio.
Was the plan properly implemented and adequate? Is the plan consistent with the principle of
designing a portfolio? What else does she need to improve her implementation?
b. For instance, you will teach Mathematics in Grade 3(this is for BEED )/ Mathematics for Grade 7
(this is for BSED), identify learning targets that will be appropriate and indicate classroom activities
and its corresponding assessment task/s and portfolio evidence/s. Use the template provided below.
c. Construct a Portfolio Assessment Rubric in any Topic in English for Grade 4 for BEED /English for
Grade 8 for the BSED.
References:
Cajigal, R.M. et.al. (2014). Assessment of Learning 2.Quezon City: Adriana publishing Co., Inc.
Hena, L.J. (2015). Classroom Assessment2. Quezon City: Great Books Trading
Navarro, R.L. et. al. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes.Quezon City:
Lorimar Publishing Inc.
Santos, R.D. (2007). Advanced Methods in Educational Assessment and Evaluation.Quezon City:
Lorimar Publishing Inc.
MODULE XI-GRADING & REPORTING
A. Functions of Grading and Reporting Systems
B. Types of Grading and Reporting Systems
C. Development of a Grading & Reporting System
D. Assigning Letter Grades and Computing Grades
E. Norm or Criterion-Referenced Grading
F. Distribution of Grades and Guidelines for Effective Grading
G. Conducting Parent-Teacher Conferences
Intended Learning Outcomes:
1. gain understanding on the following:
1.1 functions of grading and reporting systems
1.2 types of grading and reporting systems
1.3 development of grading & reporting systems
1.4 assigning letter grades and computing grades
2. distinguish norm-referenced grading and criterion-referenced grading
3. Explain the guidelines for effective grading
4. give importance in conducting Parent-Teacher Conferences
2. PASS/FAIL. The pass or fail system utilizes dichotomous grade system. Either a student has
compiled and reached certain standards, in which case he passes or he failed to do so or he gets a
failing mar. This is a popular in some courses, subject in college/institution(but not very much
practised in basic education).the pass-fail system should be kept to a minimum(just to pass), and in
mastery learning courses, no grades are reflected until “mastery” threshold is reached.
Advantages:
. Simplifies the grading process for teachers and students.
. Use of a single minimal cut-off and only to two grade categories improve the reliability of grade
assignments.
. Pass/fail grading has the potential to make learning environments more relaxed by focusing
students’ attention on learning rather than on grade.
.Pass/fail grading is what students will face in many real-life situations.
Disadvantages:
. Students gain very little prescriptive information.
. Students spend less time studying if pass/fail grading is used than when a wider range of grading
system is utilized.
. Students only study to attain minimum passing level and show less effort in striving for excellence.
3. Percentage Grades
. Are the ultimate multi-category grading method.
. Can range from 0 to 100
. Generally more popular among high school teachers than elementary teachers.
Advantages:
. Requires a great deal of abstraction
. Interpretation of meaning of a percentage grade extremely difficult
.The cut-offs are no less arbitrary but a lot more
-Because of a large number of grade categories, it is less reliable and more subjective.
4. Standards-Based Grading
In an effort to bring greater clarity and specificity to the grading process, many schools initiated
standards- based grading procedures and reporting forms. Guskey and Bailey (2001) identify four
steps in developing standards-based grading:
1. Identify the major learning goals or standards that students will be expected to achieve at each
grade level or in each course of study.
2. Establish performance indicators for the learning goals.
3. Determine graduated level of quality( benchmarks) for assessing each goal or standard
4. Develop reporting tools that communicate teachers’ judgments of students’ learning progress and
culminating achievement in relation to the learning goals and standards.
Advantages:
. When clear learning goals or standards are established, standards-based grading offers meaningful
information about standards are established, standards-based grading offers meaningful information
about students’ achievement and performance to students, parents, and to others.
. If information is detailed, it can be useful for diagnostic and prescriptive purposes
.Facilitates teaching and learning processes better than any other grading method.
Disadvantages:
. Takes a lot of effort.
. Often too complicated for parents to understand.
. May not communicate the appropriateness of students’ progress
. Allows for maximum discriminators in evaluation of students’ achievement and performance
. Maximizes the variation among students, making it easier to choose students for honors or
representative for special programs.
OTHER SUPPLEMENTARY FOR REPORTING GRADES:
1. CHECKLISTS OF OBJECTIVES. In this system, the objectives of the course are enumerated. After
each objective, the students’ level of achievement is indicated: outstanding, Very Good, Good, Fair
or poor. This is a very detailed reporting system and tends to be more informative for the parents
and learners at the same time. It is, however, also very time consuming to prepare. There is also the
potential problem of keeping the list manageable and understandable.
2. LETTERS TO PARENTS/GUARDIANS. Letters to parents and guardians are useful supplement to
grades. However they have limited value as sole report because they are very time consuming to
prepare, the accounts of weaknesses are often misinterpreted by parents and guardians, and they
are characterized neither as systematic nor cumulative.
3. PORTFOLIOS. A portfolio is a set of purposefully selected works, with commentary by student and
teacher. Portfolios are useful for showing students’ strengths and weaknesses, illustrating range of
students’ work. Showing progress over time or stages of a project, teaching students about
objectives/ standards they are to meet.
4. PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES. Parent-teacher conferences are mainly used in elementary
schools. This requires that parents of learners come for a conference with the teacher to discuss the
learner’s progress. Portfolios, when available are useful basis for discussion. Such conferences are
useful for a two-way flow of information and getting more information and cooperation from the
parents. They are however of limited value as a report because most parents do not come for such
conferences.
C. DEVELOPMENT OF A GRADING AND REPORTING SYSTEM
Grading and reporting systems are guided by the functions to be served by such in the educative
process. The system will most probably be a compromise because of the hosts of factors to be
considered in the preparation of such. The important thing to note, however, is that we should
always keep achievement reports separate from effort expended.
Grading and reporting systems should be developed cooperatively (parents, students, school
personnel) in order to ensure development of a more adequate system, and a system that is
understandable to all. They should be:
1. based on clear statement of learning objectives. The grading and reporting system needs to be
based on the same set of learning objective that the parents, teachers and students agreed at the
beginning.
2. consistent with school standards. The system must support the school standards rather than
oppose the school standards already set.
3. based on adequate assessment. The grading and reporting system should be easily verifiable
through adequate system of testing, measurement and assessment methods.
4. based on the right level of detail. The system must be detailed enough to be diagnostic but
compact enough to be practical; not too time consuming to prepare and use, understable to users
and easily summarized for school records purposes.
5. provide for parent-teacher conferences as needed
D. ASSIGNING LETTER GRADES AND COMPUTING GRADES
Grades assigned to students must include only ACHIEVEMENT. It is very important to avoid the
temptation to include effort for the less able students because it is difficult to assess effort or
potential and it is difficult to distinguish ability from achievement. Furthermore, if achievement and
efforts are combined in some way, grades would mean different things for different individuals.
Grades reflected on report cards are numbers or numerical quantities, arrived at after several data
on the student’s performance are combined. The following guidelines may be considered in
combining such data:
1. Properly weight each component to create a composite. The weights used are normally agreed
upon by the school officials. Example: How many percent goes for quizzes, unit tests, periodic tests,
etc. The more scientific approach is to use a principal components analysis which is hardly practiced
in schools because of the difficulty involved.
2. Put all components on the same scale to weight properly:
a. equate ranges of scores.
b. or convert all to T-scores or other standard scores.
E. NORM OR CRITERION-REFERENCED GRADING
Grades may reflect relative performance, like score compared to other students (where you rank).
This is more commonly called a norm-referenced grading system. In such a system:
a. grade (like a class rank) depends on what group you are in, not just your own performance;
b. typical grades may be shifted upon down, depending on group’s ability;
c. widely used because much classroom testing is norm-referenced.
Grades may also reflect ABSOLUTE PERFORMANCE like score compared to specified performance
standards (what you can do), this is more commonly called a CRITERION-REFERENCED GRADING. In
such a system:
a. grade does NOT depend on what group you are in, but only on your own performance compared
for a set of performance standards.
b. grading is a complex task, because grades must:
b.1 clearly define the domain;
b.2 clearly define and justify the performance standards;
b.3 be based on criterion- referenced assessment.
c. conditions are hard to meet except in complete mastery learning lettings.
Finally, grades may also reflect learning ability or improvement performance, like score compared to
learning “potential” or past performance. In such a system:
a. grades are inconsistent with a standard-based system because now, each child is his/her own
standard;
b. reliability estimating learning ability (separate from achievement) is very difficult.
c. one cannot reliably measure change with classroom measures;
d. therefore, should only be used as a supplement.
F. DISTRIVUTION OF GRADES AND GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVE GRADING
How should grades be distributed? The Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced distribution of
grades have been in practice for several years now. The Norm-referenced or relative (have ranked
the students) distribution is a big issue because of the following considerations;
a. normal curve is defensible only when we have a large, unselected group;
b. when “grading on the curve,” school staff should set fair ranges of grades for different groups and
courses;
c. when “grading on the curve”. Any pass/fail decision should be based on an ABSOLUTE
standard(like failed the minimum essentials);
d. standards and ranges should be understood and followed by all teachers.
On the other hand, the criterion- referenced or absolute (have assessed absolute levels of
knowledge) grading system is not an issue because:
a. it seldom uses letter grades alone;
b. it often includes checklists of what have been mastered;
c. the distribution of grades is not predetermined.
G. GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVE GRADING
The following guideline for effective grading and reporting are recommended for use in Philippine
Schools:
a. describe grading procedures to students at beginning of instruction.
b. Clarify that course grade will be based on achievement only.
c. explain how other factors (effort, work habits, etc.) will be reported.
d. Relate grading procedures to intended learning outcomes.
e. Obtain valid evidence (tests, etc.) for assigning grades)
g. Prevent cheating
h. Properly weight the various types of achievements included in the grade.
i. Do not lower an achievement grade for tardiness, weak effort, or misbehaviour.
j. Be fair, Avoid bias. When in doubt, review the evidence. If still in doubt, give the higher grade.
H. CONDUCTING PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES
Parent-Teacher conferences become productive when they are carefully planned and the teacher is
skilled in handling such conferences. Skills in conducting parent-teacher conferences can be
developed. Here are some hints on conducting good conferences:
GUIDELINES FOR A GOOD CONFERENCE
A. Make plans
. Review your goals
.Organize the information to present
. Make list of points to cover and questions to ask
.If portfolios are brought, select and review carefully
B. Start positive and maintain a positive focus.
. Present student’s strong points first
. Be helpful and have example of work to show strengths and needs.
. Compare early vs later work to show improvement
C. Encourage parents to participate and share information
.Be willing to listen
. Be willing to answer questions
D. Plan actions cooperatively
.What steps can you take?
. Summarize at the end
E. End with positive comment
. Should not be a vague generality
. Should be true
F. Use good human relations skills
LEARNING ACTIVITIES:
A. Answer:
1. Enumerate & explain the following:
1.1 functions of grading and reporting systems
1.2 types of grading and reporting systems
2. Explain :
2.1 development of grading and reporting systems
2.2 designing letter grades and computing grades
3. differentiate norm-referenced grading and criterion-referenced grading.
4. give and explain:
4.1 guidelines for effective grading
4.2 importance in conducting Parent-Teacher Conferences.
ASSESSMENT TASKS:
A.Directions: Indicate which type of marking and reporting system best fits each statement listed below. Write
letter only for your answer.
1. Provides for two-way reporting.
a. traditional letter grade( A,B,C,D,E)
b. two-letter grade(pass/fail)
c. checklist of objectives
d. parent-teacher conference
2.Provides most useful learning guide to student.
a. traditional letter grade(A,B,C,D,E)
b. two-letter grade(pass/fail)
c. checklist of objectives
d. parent-teacher conference
3. Provides least information concerning learning.
a. traditional letter grade(A,B,C,D,E)
b. two-letter grade(pass/fail)
c. checklist of objectives
d. parent-teacher conference
4. Most preferred by college admission officers.
a. traditional letter grade(A,B,C,D,E)
b. two-letter grade(pass/fail)
c. checklist of objectives
d. parent-teacher conference
5. May be two complex to be understood by parents.
a. traditional letter (A,B,C,D,E)
b. two-letter grade(pass/fail)
c. checklist of objective
d. parent-teacher conference
B.This is relative to Assigning Grades. Indicate whether each of the following statements describes a
DESIRABLE or an UNDESIRABLE practice in assigning relative letter grades on the blank. Put D if the practice is
desirable and U if not. Write your answer on your paper.
1. The grades should reflect the learning outcomes specified for the course.
2. To give test scores equal weight in a composite score, the scores should be simply added together.
3. If it is decided to assign different weights to some scores, the weighting should be based on the maximum
possible score on the test.
4. Grades should be lowered for tardiness or misbehaviour.
5. Pass/fail decisions should be based on an absolute standard of achievement.
C. This is relative to Absolute Grades. Indicate whether each of the following statements describes a DESRABLE
practice or an UNDESIRABLE practice in assigning absolute letter grades. Write D for Desirable and U for
Undesirable.
1. Absolute grades should be used with mastery learning.
2. Clearly defined domains of learning tasks should provide the basis for grading.
3. If all students pass a test, a harder test should be given before grades are assigned.
4. The distribution of grades to be assigned should be predetermined and explained.
5. When using absolute grading, the standard for passing should be predetermined.
D.This is relative to conducting a parent-teacher conference. Indicate whether each of the following
statements describes a DESIRABLE practice of an UNDESIRABLE practice in conducting parent-teacher
conferences.
1. Before the conference, assemble a portfolio of specific information about examples of the student’s learning
progress.
2. Present examples of the student’s work to parents.
3. Begin the conference by describing the student’s learning difficulties.
4. Make clear to parents that, as a teacher, you know what is best for the student’s learning and development.
5. In the concluding phase, review your conference notes with the parents.
References:
Cajigal, R.M. (2014). Assessment of Learning 2.Quezon City: Adriana Publishing Co, Inc.
Hena, L.J. (2015). Classroom Assessment 2. Quezon City: Great Books Trading.
Navarro, R.L. et.al.Assessment of Learning 2.Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
Santos, R.D. (2007).Advanced Methods in educational Assessment. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc.