Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Daneshmand 1976
Daneshmand 1976
Thirty interdental sites in 30' subjects having varying degrees of periodontal inflammatory
disease were evaluated. A G.I. seore was recorded, crevicular fluid collected and measured,
pocket depths measured and biopsies undertaken. Two histological indices were devel-
oped, one hased on the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration and epithelial breakdown
(H.I.) the other on the number of extravasated inflammatory cells (LCI.). Low positive
correlations of about the same strength (r = 0.3) were found between both histological
indices and the G.I. and fluid measurements. No correlation at all was found between the
histological index and pocket depth, but there was a slight correlation between the in-
flammatory cell index and the depth of the pockets. A moderate correlation was found
between the amount of gingival fluid and G.I. scores. A low degree of correlation was
found when the G.I. was compared with pocket depths. The strongest relationship was
between the Histological Index and the Inflammatory Cell Index. It seems probable that
different indices evaluate different aspects of the inflammatory response. In studies of
small samples it may be wise to incorporate parameters which evaluate both macroscopic
and microscopic characteristics as. well as measurement of gingival fluid whenever practic-
able. For incidence and prevalence studies, however, a gingival index based on macro-
scopic criteria and measurements of pockets and loss of attachment are much simpler and
quicker than the collection, staining and measurement of gingival fluid, whilst histological
examination is usually impracticable.
Frank and Cimasoni (1972) state that it is Brill (1959a & b) suggested measuring
now generally agreed that the intensity of gingival fluid flow from the gingival pocket,
gingival or crevicular fluid flow in man is Brill and Krasse (1958 & 1959) and Brill
related to gingival inflammation and pocket and Bjorn (1959) measured crevicular fluid
depth (Brill & Bjorn 1959, Maon 1963). flow with filter paper strips inserted into
Clinical assessment of gingival inflamma- the crevice until resistance was felt. The
tion depends on evaluation of changes in fluid flow increased in cases of gingivitis.
colour, surface characteristics, texture, coo- Brill's method has been used and evaluated
tour, consistency and bleeding tendency, by several investigators. Mann (1963) found
These determinations are subjective and, a correlation between the amount of gin-
therefore, susceptible to examiner varia- gival fluid, scores for gingival inflammation
bility. and depths of the gingival crevices. Egelberg
36 DANESHMAND A N D BRYAN! W A D E
Interdental gingival biopsies have been obtained and nine sections from each were
extensively investigated by Bernier (1950). evaluated morphometricaUy. The percentage
All gingival tissues showed some histologic distribution of inflammatory round cells,
evidence of inflammation regardless of the collagen fibres, connective tissue cells and
clinical state. He concluded that since tissue blood vessels was studied. They found a
changes precede clinically detectable chan- positive correlation between the M Index
ges, to establish a clinical index of gingival and crevicular fluid, as well as between the
disease would be impractical. Brill (1960) M. Index and the degree of inflammatory
studied specimens from dogs with both cell infiltration. A high positive correlation
healthy and pathologically involved gingiva. also existed between the gingival fluid and
He demonstrated inflammatory cells scan- the round cell infiltration. A negative cor-
tily distributed beneath the crevicular epi- relation existed between crevicular fluid and
thelium in the clinically normal sections and the percentage of staitiable collagen fibres.
highly increased in number in the clinically In view of the existing confusion an in-
inflamed gingiva. He also found a relation- vestigation was undertaken to evaluate any
ship between gingival fluid measurements correlation between gingival fluid flow and
and the microscopic appearance of the tis- macroscopic and microscopic changes of
sue. Egelberg (1964) found a significant gingival tissue.
correlation between the size of the areas of
inflammation in clinically normal and in-
flamed gingiva and the amount of gingiva! Materials and Methods
exudate from three dogs. Subjects were 30 adult patients, for whom
Zachrisson and Schultz-Haudt (1968) re- treatment had not been started, randomly
cently suggested a classification of the de- selected from those attending the Depart-
gree of inflammation in clinically normal ment of Periodontology of the Royal Dental
and inflamed gingiva based upon a compa- Hospital of London. The study was made on
rative histologic study. The appearance of 30 sites, one from each subject, chosen
the pocket epithelium and the density and haphazardly in an endeavour to obtain a
distribution of the cell infiltration in the wide range of severity of inflammation and
connective tissue were used to evaluate the periodontal destruction.
degree of gingival inflammation. They found The papillae were scored according to the
a relationship between clinical and histo- Gingival Index (G.I.) of Loe and Silness
logical diagnosis in about 50 per cent of the (1963).
cases. AH clinically healthy cases exhibited Crevicular fluid was collected in the way
scantily distributed inflammatory cells. The described by Loe and Holm-Pedersen
investigators suggested that the degree of (1965). The gingiva was dried with the aid
inflammation should be classified histologic- of a stream of warm air and strips of filter
ally. paper (Whatman No. 4) cut to 1.5 mms.
Riidin et al. (1970) also measured gingival vidde and at least 10 mm. long were used.
fluid related to 30 maxillary and mandibular The tips of each strip were gently placed
teeth. They used filter paper strips with a jiust into the orifices of the crevices or
standardized notch at the tip, designed to pockets on both the mesial and distal aspects
ensure only minimal insertion into the of the interdental papilla parallel to the long
crevice midway between the papillae. The axes of the teeth. The strips were kept in
clinical severity of marginal inflammation place for three m'nutes, before being re-
was scored using the M Index. Biopsies were moved, allowed to dry, and stained with a
38 DANESHMAND AND BRYAN WADE
niohydrin solution (0.2 % ninhydrin in beyond the apical limit of the junctional
acetone) for ten seconds. The mid-width epithelium. The specimen was fixed in 10 per
length of the coloured areas of the strips cent formal-saline, before being cut in half
was subsequently measured at the conclusion vertically and each half embedded ctit side
of the experiment with a magnifying lens down in paraffin Sections were cut at 6(j,
graduated at 0.1 mm. intervals to the near- and collected at different levels starting from
est graduation. When making these measure- the midline of the papilla. An attempt was
ments no reference was made to the other made to cut each hlock at five levels and
recorded parameters. to collect four sections at each level thereby
Following collection of exudate, the producing twenty sections for evaluation,
depths of the pockets each side of the inter- but with some specimens the thickness was
dental papilla were carefully measured to insufficient to permit this number and fewer
the nearest half millimeter with a Fox perio- had to be examined. The minimum number
dontal probe graduate at 1 mm. intervals. of sections obtained from any specimen was
As it was difficult to make G.L scores at twelve. Sections were stained with haema-
each side of the papilla, a mean figure of toxylin and eosin.
fluid measurements and a mean figure of The histological appearance was assessed
pocket depth were calculated for each pa- at XlOO magnification according to the
pilla. following criteria:
After measuring pocket depths, the inter- 0 No break in continuity of the crevicular
dental papilla was anaesthetised with 2 % epithelium; absence of inflammatory cells.
Lignoeaine plus 1:80,000 adrenaline solu- 1 No epithelial break; sparse distribution of
tion. Special care was taken to inject remote inflammatory cells.
from the site of biopsy and to inject only 2 Crevicular epithelial disintegration; round
a minimal amount of fluid. A gingivectomy cell infiltration not reaching basal layer
incision was then made to free the vestibular of the outer gingival epithelium.
interdental papilla, care being taken to en- 3 Disintegration of the crevicular epithe-
sure that the incision contacted cementum lium; round cell infiltration extending to
the basal layer of the outer gingival epi-
thelium (Fig. 1).
The highest score given for any section
examined will be referred to as the Histo-
logical Index (H.I.) for the particular papilla
from which the sections were obtained.
In addition the sections were evaluated
morphometricaUy using a graticule eye-
piece at X 100 magnification. Inflammatory
cells in the corium crossed by the horizontal
Fig. 1. Method of scoring HJstoiiogicaf Index. and vertical lines of the grid were counted.
Cf No break in contmuity of the crevicular epithelium:
absence of mfiammatory ceils.
A mean score for each papilla was cal-
1 No epitiieiia! break; sparse distribution of snfiam- culated by summating the scores and divid-
matory ceils. ing the total by the number of sections
2 Crevicular epitheliai disintegration; round ceiJ in-
fiitration not reaching basai iayer of tiie outer
examined. This will be referred to as the
gingjval epithieiium. Inflammatory Cell Index (I.C.L).
3 Disintegration of the crevicuiar epitiieiium; round
ceii i:nfii1raticn extendiing; to the basai iayer of the
Regression and Correlation Coefficients
outer gingival epithelium. were calculated and scatter diagrams drawn.
GINGIVAL FLUID CORRELATION 39
330 - |
310 _ •
310 _
290 _ •
290 .
270 - •
250 - 270 .
•
230 - 250 -
210 _ •
• 230 -
190 .. •
210.
170 - m
150 - S 190 .
IJO _ •<< &
• • * •
110 _ • .2 170 -
90 - m B 150 -
• •
70 - c
" 130
50 •
110 _
1 2 3 1 * 5 6 7 8
Gingival Fluid (mm.) 90 _
Fig. 3. Scatter diagram sfiowing reiation between in-
fiammatory Ceii index and Gingivai: Fiuid 70 _
50 il 1 1
1 2 3
GingiTal Index
3- Fig. S. Scatter diagram showing reiation between in-
fiammatory Ceii index and Gingival index.
330
7 • • 310
290
6 •
• • 270
-^ 5
• • 250
X h • • • • •
230
u» • •
S 3 • • • • • 210
•o
• • •
H 190
o
170
1 -
Bm 150
1 1 1 a 130
1 2 3
110
Histologioal Index •90
Fig. 6. Scatter diagram; showfng relation between
Histoiogicai index and Pocket Depth. 70 -
50
the Histological Index showed virtually no
1 2 3 1 1 5 6 7 8
correlation (r = +0.01, P < 0.95, Fig. 6). Pocket depth (mm.)
Only a slight correlation between the Fig. 7. Scatter diagram showing reiation between In-
depth of the pockets and amount of inflam- fiammatOFy Ceil Index and Pocket Depth.
matory cell infiltration was found (r =
+ 0.20, 0.20 < P < 0.30, Fig. 7).
+ 0.48; P<0.01) existed between these
G.I. Index and gingival fluid. Gingival fluid parameters (Fig. 8).
flow increased with increasing G.L scores
(Table 1). G. I. Index with pocket depth. The average
A moderately strong correlation (r = of the pocket depth for 17 cases which
Table 1
Mean histological and inflammatory cell indices corresponding to G.I. and average
amounts of gingivai tluid and pocket depth of both mesiai and distal aspects of the
interdental papillae.
Histoiogicai infiamtnatory Gingivai
Pocket D'epth
index Ceil index G. i. Fiuid
(H. I.) (i. C. i.) (mm:,) (mm.)
7-
6-
1 -
Gingival Index
Fig. 8. Scatter diagram showing reiation between scored G.I. = 1 was 3.61 whereas for 10
Qingival Fiuid and Gingiivai index. cases with G.I. = 2 was 4.37 and for 3
cases with G.I. = 3 was 4.25. However the
G.I. index when compared with pocket
depth showed a low degree of correlation
( r = +0.24, 1.10 < P < 0.20, Fig. 9).
7
Gingival fluid and pocket depth. Although
6 the mean figures suggested that there was a
greater amount of gingival fluid when the
5 pockets were deeper (Table 1), plotting the
actual figures (Fig. 10) showed no relation-
h ship (r = +0.O1; P < 0.90).
Discussion
1 2 5 Theoretically one would expect the amount
Gingival Index of fluid collected at the orifice of a crevice
Fig. 9. Scatter diagram showing relation between or pocket to be an expression of the degree
Gingi'vai index and Pocket Depth. of permeability of the hlood vessels of the
GINGIVAL FLUID CORRELATiON 43
ent investigation show that the index based sessment and more comparable to the H.I.
on what might be regarded as the extent of of the present study.
inflammatory involvement and that quan- Correlation between the microscopic eva-
titating the number of extravasated cells luations and measurement of collected gin-
were not measuring the same phenomenon gival fluid revealed a coefficient of +0.50 in
to the same degree. This highhghts only one the study of Orban and Stallard (1969),
aspect of measuring the severity of inflam- + 0.746 in that of Rlidin et al. (1970), again
matory involvement by histological means. + 0.501 (Orban et al. 1970) in what was
Even if a suitable and aceurate parameter probably a further report of the 1969 study,
could be developed there is still the diffi- + 0.51 and +0.55 in that of Stallard et al.,
culty of obtaining material for histological (1970) and +0.32 with the H.I. and +0.34
evaluation. This is a major problem and it with the I.C.I, in the present study. Egelberg
is obvious that an index which does not (1964) found figures of +0.67, +0.71 and
necessitate excision of tissue has much to + 0.78 in each of three dogs where the
commend it. The need seems, therefore, to comparison was with the area of round cell
be the development of a histological index infiltration.
which accurately reflects the situation and Of the four studies in which both the
then to determine which clinical index cor- macroscopic and microscopic gingiva! state
relates most closely with it. It is interesting were related to the amount of gingival fluid
to note that whereas the mean amount of it was found that the correlation with fluid
gingival fluid ranged from 0.2-7.8 mm. the was greater when assessment of inflamma-
H.I. was always either 2 or 3 (Fig. 2). tory involvement was based on a count of
Comparison between the various studies cells. Clinical assessment showed a stronger
is only possible where the results were anal- correlation than microscopic evaluation
ysed by the calculation of correlation coef- which was subjective and when area of
ficients. Even such comparison is tenuous as inflammatory involvement was assessed by
investigators used different indices for eva- both the extent of cellular infiltration and
luating both the microscopic and macro- destruction of pocket epithelium the cor-
scopic state of the gingivae and measured, relation was of equal strength.
as well as collected, gingival fluid in differ- A further complicating factor was that the
ent ways. collection of fluid was by the intracrevicular
Rlidin et al. (1970) found a correlation method in the studies which showed a
coefficient of -1-0.693 between the extent of stronger correlation with the gingival score
round cell infiltration and the severity of gin- and by the orifice method when the cor-
givitis determined by the M index; Orban et relation between microscopic score and gin-
al. (1970) of -1-0.68 using the PDI; Stallard gival fluid was stronger.
et al. (1970) of 0.62, 0.65 and 0.68 in three As the differences in strength of the re-
groups again using the PDI, whilst the pres- spective correlations was not great it cannot
ent study revealed one of -fO.32 between be said that any of the studies have demon-
the H.I. and the G.I. and -t-0.26 between strated a truer representation of the histo-
the i.C.I. and G.I. Explanation of these logical changes by either a subjective clinical
differences is difficult as the histological evaluation or by the measurement of gin-
methods of Riidin et al. (1970) were similar gival fluid.
to the I.C.I, of the present study, whereas A subjective clinical assessment using any
those of Orban et al. (1970) and Stallard of the advocated indices is far easier and
et al. (1970) were based on a subjective as- less time consuming than the collection and
GINGJVAL FLUID CORRELATION 45
measurement of gingival fluid and would Brill, N. 1959a. Effect of chewing on flow of
seem to be the wisest parameter for use in tissue fluid into human gingival pockets.
many clinical studies at the present time. Acta Odontol Scand. 17: 277-284.
It is possible that the gingival fluid index Brill, N. 1959b. Influence of cappillary per-
nneability on flow of tissue into gingival
may be more valuable when making wound pockels. Acta Odontol. Scand. 17: 23-33.
healing studies after surgical assault. This is Brill, N. & Bjorn, H. 1959. Passage of tissue
a facet which requires further study. fluid into hutnan gingival pockets. Acta
Studies relating the amount of gingiva! Odontol. Scand. 17: 11-21.
Brill. N. 1960. Gingival conditions related to
fluid to estimates of gingival inflammation flow of tissue fluid into gingival pockets.
assessed by clinical criteria have tended to Acta Odontol Scand. 18: 421-446.
assume that the latter are an accurate re- Brill, N. 1962. The gingival pocket fluid studies
presentation of the degree of inflammatory of its occurrence, composition and effects.
Acta Odontol. Scand. 20: Supp!. 32.
involvement (Mann 1963, Wilson & Me
Egelberg, J. 1964. Gingival exudate measure-
Hugh 1969). The revelation in other studies ments for evaluation of inflammatory
(Orban et al. 1970, Riidin et al. 1970, Stal- changes of the gingiva. Odontol. Revy 15:
lard et al. 1970 and preseot study) that the 381-398.
correlation between histological indices and Egelberg, J. 1967. Vascular permeability of
chronically inflamed gingivae. /. Perlodontat
gingival indices may range from +0.26-0.69 Res. 1: Suppl. 1.
suggests that gingival indices only partially Frank, R. M. & Cimasoni, G. 1972. Electron
reflect assessment of the changes observed microscopy of aeid phosphatase in the exu-
at microscopic level. Evaluation of the lat- date from inflamed gingivae. J. Periodontal
ter is stOl, however, far from satisfactory Res. 7: 213-225.
Golub, L. M., Borden, S. M. & Kleinberg, I.
and in view of this it would still seem that 1971. Urea content of gingival cxevicnlar
the comparatively simple clinical indices are fluid and its relation to periodontal disease
at the moment those of choice for many in humans. I. Periodontal Res. 5: 243-251.
clinical studies. Loe, H. & Holm-Pedersen, P. 1965. Absence
and presence ot fluid from normal and in-
flamed gingivae. Periodontics. 3: 171-177.
Part of a report submitted to the University Loe, H. & Silness, J. 1963. Periodontal disease
of London in partial fulfilment of the re- in pregnancy. Prevalence and severity. A-cta
quirements for the degree of Master of Odontol. Scand. 21: 533-551.
Loe, H., Theilade, E. & Jensen, S. B. 1965.
Science in Periodontology. Experimental gingivitis in man. i. Periodon-
toi 36, 177-1S7.
Mann, W. V. 1963. The correlation of gingivitis
pocket depth and exudate from the gingival
crevice. ]. Periodontoi 34: 379-387.
References Oliver, R. C , Holm-Pedersen, P. & Loe, H.
Bernier, J. L. 1950. The histologie changes of 1969. The correlation between clinical
the gingival tissues in health and periodontal scoring:, exudate measurements and micro-
disease. Oral Surg. 3; 1194-1199. scopic evaluation of inflammation in the
Bjorn, A., Koch, G. & Lindhe, J. 1965. Evalua- gingiva. J. Periodontoi. 40: 201-209.
tion of gingival flaid measurements. Odont. Orban, J. E. & Stallard, R. E. 1969. Gingival
Revy 16: 300-307. crevicuiar fluid: a reliable predictor of gin-
Brill, N. & Krasse, B. 1958. Passage of tissue gival health? /. Periodontoi 40: 231-235.
fluid into the clinically healthy gingival Orban, J. E., Stallard, R. E. & Bandt, C. L.
pocket Acta Odontol. Scand. 16: 233-245. 1970. An evaluation of indexes for peri-
Brill, R & Krasse, B. 1959. Effects of mech- odontal health. } . Amer. Dent. Assoc. 81:
anical stimulation on flow of tissue fluid 683-687.
through gingival pocket epitheliam. Acta Rlidin, H. L, Overdi-ik, H. F. & Rateilscliak,
odont. Scand. 17: 115-130. K. H. 1970. Correlation between salcus fluid
46 DANESHMAND AND BRYAN WADE
rate and clinical and histological inflamma- Sueda, T., Imagawa, Y. & Araya, S. 1965.
tion of the marginal gingiva. Helv. Odontol Bull. Tokyo med.. & dent. Univ. 12: 159.
Acta 14: 21-26. (Cited by Wilson, A. G. & McHugh, W. D.
Sandalli, P. & Wade, A. B. 1969. Alteration in 1971. Gingival exudate — an index of gin-
crevicular fluid flow during healing following givitis? Dent. Pract. 21: 261-266.)
gingivectomy and flap procedures. /. Peri- Wilson, A. G. & McHugh, W. D. 1971. Gin-
odontal Res. 4: 314-318. gival exudate - an index of gingivitis? Dent.
Sandalli, P. & Wade, A. B. 1971. Crevicular Pract. 21: 261-266.
fluid flow in young children. /. Periodontol. Zachrisson, B. U. & Schultz-Haudt, S. D. 1968.
42: 713-716. A comparative histological study of clinically
Stallard, R. E., Orban, J. E. & Hove, K. A. normal and chronically inflamed gingivae
1970. Clinical significance of the inflamma- from the same individuals. Odont. Tidskr. 76:
tory process. J. Periodontol. 41: 620-624. 179-192.
Address;
A. Bryan Wade
Royal Dental Hospital
Leicester Square
London, WC2H 7LJ
England