Vol-5 Issue-4 2019 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396

A Comparative study of Rights and Duties of

shareholders in Corporate Law in India
1
Rupendra Singh Udawat, 2 Prof. (Dr.) Sanjaya Choudhary
1
Research Scholar , Law Deptt., Bhagwant University, Ajmer, Rajasthan
2
Associate Prof., Law Deptt., Bhagwant University, Ajmer, Rajasthan

Abstract

Everything you need to know about corporate governance. Corporate governance defines the way in which a
corporate enterprise should be governed. It describes corporate values, norms and ethics. It explains the direction of
development of a corporate enterprise. “Corporate governance is the relationship between corporate managers,
directors and providers of equity, people and institutions who save and invest their capital to earn returns. This
ensures that the board of directors is accountable for the pursuit of corporate objectives and that the corporation
itself is compliant with the law and regulations. " The purpose of this research is to study the importance of
implementing codes and rules of shareholder rights in corporate law as the public already realizes the close
relationship between business and management. India has tried and initiated over the years to improve the standards
of corporate governance, including the introduction of a new Companies Bill in 2013. However, further measures
are needed to improve minority shareholder protection, support higher levels of transparency and disclosure, and
promote more. Accountability of controlling shareholders. This provides greater scope for RPTs controlling
shareholders, and increases the likelihood of misuse if not held at arms length. Therefore, there is a need to
determine and evaluate the effectiveness of minority shareholder protection and monitoring and prevention of
abusive RPTs. The goodness of India's corporate governance in the policies, practices and systems of corporate
governance is examined on the basis of five basic parameters i.e. transparency, ownership structure, board process,
investor rights and governance strategies. Corporate governance is a multi-disciplinary field of study covering a
wide range of disciplines - accounting, consulting, economics, ethics, finance, law and management.

Keywords: Corporate governance, Multi-disciplinary, Consulting, Economics, Ethics, Finance, Law and
Management.

Introduction

Corporate law ("company" or "corporation" law) is the most effective type of business venture of modern times.
Corporate law is the study of interactions between shareholders, directors, employees, lenders and other
stakeholders, such as consumers, communities, and environmental firms under internal regulations.
Corporate law is a part of broad company law (or the law of business associations). Other types of business
associations may include partnerships (like most law firms), or trusts (such as a pension fund) or companies limited
by guarantee (such as some universities or charities). Corporate law is about a large business that has a separate
legitimate personality with limited liability or unlimited liability to its members or shareholders, who buy or sell
their stocks based on the performance of the board of directors. It does business with firms that are incorporated or
registered under the company laws of a sovereign state or their subnational provinces. There are four characteristics
that define a modern corporation: [1]

13813 www.ijariie.com 1713

Vol-5 Issue-4 2019 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396

Separate legitimate personality of the corporation (right to prosecute and prosecute in its own name, ie to see the
company as a human being by law).
Limited liability of shareholders (so that if the company goes bankrupt, they will be the debtors of the same money
which they received in exchange for the share.)
Transferable shares (often with a listed exchange, such as the London Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange
or Euronext of Paris)
Paid management, in other words, the control of the company rests with the Board of Directors.
In most developed countries, the board is appointed by both shareholders and employees as representatives to "co-
ordinate" the company's strategies, except in English-speaking countries. Corporate law is often divided into
corporate governance (which is associated with various power relations within the corporation) and corporate
finance (which is linked to the use of capital).
History
Although some forms of companies are thought to exist in ancient Rome and ancient Greece, the modern company's
closely recognized ancestor originated only after the second millennium. The first recognized professional
associations belonged to medieval categories, with category members agreeing to follow the rules of the category,
but did not participate in general profit ventures. The initial forms of joint venture were actually partnerships under
lex mercatoria.
But with the expansion of international commerce, the approval of the royal authority for business ventures in
Europe (mainly England and Holland) increased. The royal charter often conferred exclusive rights to the trading
companies (often including some form of monopolies). Originally the traders of these entities traded stock on their
own responsibility, but later the members started operating the joint account and a new joint stock company
emerged. [7]
The early companies were purely economic ventures; But later it was realized that the main advantage of holding
joint stock was that the stock of the company could not be seized in lieu of a person's debt. [8] The development of
company law in Europe was interrupted in the 17th century by two infamous "bubbles" (the South Sea bubble in
England and the Tulip bulb bubble in Holland), which led to the development of companies in two major
jurisdictions, which remained popular for a century.
But the companies almost inevitably returned to the forefront of commerce, although investors had returned to the
stock trading (trading) of unincorporated unions to defraud the 'Bubble Act-1720' in England until it was dismissed
by 1825 Stayed. However, the cumbersome process of obtaining the royal authority was insufficient to keep up with
the demand. In England, there was an enthusiastic trade in the business of charter companies of defunct companies.
Prevarication between laws, however, meant that the first equivalent of modern companies was created by
registration only after the 'Joint Stock Companies Act 1844' in England. Soon the Limited Liability Act came in
1855, which limited the liability of all its shareholders to the capital invested by them, upon the insolvency of the
company. Modern company law emerged when both laws were brought under the 'Joint Stock Companies Act 1856'
with the effort of the then Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trade, Mr. Robert Law. Soon the law paved the way for
the development of railways and since then the number of companies built started increasing. In the second half of
the nineteenth century, a period of recession arose and as the number of the company grew, so did many weakens
and went bankrupt. The more strong educational, legal and judicial views were opposed to the notion that
businessmen could escape their responsibilities towards it if the business failed. The final progression of the
company's history was the decision of the 'House of Lord' in the case of 'Salomon v. Salomon & Co', where the
'House of Lord' gave a separate legitimate personality of the company and the responsibilities of the company. Was
confirmed to be separated from his owners.
In a December 2006 article, 'The Economist' marked the growth of the joint-stock company as a major reason that
led to Western commerce surpassing its rivals in the post-Renaissance period. [9] Certainly early industrialization.
Should also not be underestimated.
Objective of the study
Main objective of this thesis are below:

13813 www.ijariie.com 1714

Vol-5 Issue-4 2019 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396

A right of shareholder in Corporate Law mainly focuses on the process used to direct and manage the business and
affairs of the company with the objectives of striking a balance on:
1. The attainment of the company's objectives.
2. The alignment of corporate behavior to meet the expectations of shareholders.
3. Accountability and good stewardship, taking into consideration the interests of shareholders, stakeholders,
corporate participants and society at large.
4. Goodness of corporate governance is checked on the basis of five basic parameters i.e. transparency,
ownership structure, board procedure, investor rights and governance strategies.
5. To study effects of ownership structure (shareholding pattern) on performance of a firm in India
6. To study the effect of corporate governance measured by Corporate Governance Index on financial
performance of a firm.
Materials and metals used:
The researcher relies entirely on secondary sources. Secondary sources include books related to the topic and the
importance of shareholders and their role in corporate governance in India. Journals, articles, websites and blogs are
also referenced.
Literature Review
Thomsen, Pedersen (1998) examine the impact of ownership structure on company economic performance in the
largest companies from 12 European nations. Ownership structure is measured by the identity and share of the
largest owner. Performance is measured by return on assets, market to book values and sales growth controlling for
industry.
The imprisonment is at the last minute. Proposals for expired periods may be pre-appropriated between current
individuals and on the off chance that they are to be exchanged for a new share, this will be done with the consent of
most occasions. Present persons. ("Top 20 Landmark Decisions of Corporate Law" 2017).
Kumar (2004) examined the empirical relationship between ownership structure and firm's performance using a
panel of Indian corporate firms in 1994–2000 and found that foreign shareholding patterns did not significantly
affect the firm's performance. Ongor o Vincent, Cobonio o. Peter, Ogutu Martin, (2011), analyzed forty-two
companies in Kenya. The methodology adopted was Pearson's product moment correlation and logistic regression
calculation. The results of ownership identification were analyzed based on five elements: government; Foreigner;
Institute; Diverse; and manager (insider).
Result analysis
Role of right and duties of Shareholder in Corporate Governance in India
The following is an explanation of basic rights-managed corporate investors under state law. ("Corporate
Governance - Definition, Territory and Profit" n.d.)
Right to Information
The Indian Parliament enacted the Right to Information (RTI) Act in 2013 to curb corruption and bring transparency
in the government process. Under this law, any citizen of India can get information about any department of the
government. RTI can be written by hand or by typing or online. Shareholders are privileged to look at corporate
records and data and relate to the administration and monetary execution of the element. In open organizations, a
large proportion of operational and funding data about the enterprise should be for the people in general by
documenting it with the Securities Exchange Commission. Dr. Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S (2018) Thus,
investors in non-open elements should demand data. State law accommodates the basic and procedural privilege of
investors to access and survey corporate records.
Right to vote
All partnerships must have no less than one class speaking in occupation zeal for the organization. In many
partnerships, the required ownership shares are known as "regular stock". These proposals include voting rights for
the investor.
Election of Directors
In the annual gathering, investors have the privilege of choosing the officers. A corporate designation panel of the
governing body distributes a slate of cooks and each accessible board determines the solitary executive's decision to
in situ.

13813 www.ijariie.com 1715

Vol-5 Issue-4 2019 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396

Sale of Assets
Shareholders must support the offering of all or substantially all of the corporate resources. The thought is whether it
can be successfully asked to merge or to close the company.
Dissolution
Shareholders must support the termination or "dissolution" of the partnership.
Changes in Charter
Directors should initiate any progress for articles of joining or approving. Once proposed, investors endorse or
object to the heads' proposal.
Shareholder Rights under Companies Act, 2013
Minority shareholder protection: If the occurrence of misuse or disturbance of the undertakings of the
organization by major portion investors arises, minority investors appreciate insurance and are ideal for protection
from misconduct. Speaking on the off chance that at least 100 investors, or at least 10% of the total number of
investors, may apply to the Company Law Board on the off chance that they are of the view that the organization
issues premiums to the general population. Or being driven in a harshly biased manner for the benefit of the
organization or for any investor.
Change in MOA or AOA: The Articles of Association or Articles of Association of a company can be amended
only in a general assembly, which can be assembled by giving sufficient notice to the investors of the organization.
All investors have the privilege of voting on amendments that identify with changes to the MOA or AOA. Some
changes require a confirmed vote of at least 75% of investors, who require an unusually large share.
Transfer Shares: Shareholders of an organization have the privilege to openly exchange shares held by them in the
organization, aside from this, to the board on the possibility that they are not fully paid or where the transferees are
not a man confirmed by the board.
Comparative Study on Rights and Duties of shareholders in Corporate Law in India
Corporate law ("company" or "corporation" law) is the most effective type of business venture of modern times.
Corporate law is the study of interactions between shareholders, directors, employees, lenders and other
stakeholders, such as consumers, communities, and environmental firms under internal regulations.
Corporate law is a part of broad company law (or the law of business associations). Other types of business
associations may include partnerships (like most law firms), or trusts (such as a pension fund) or companies limited
by guarantee (such as some universities or charities). Corporate law is about a large business that has a separate
legitimate personality with limited liability or unlimited liability to its members or shareholders, who buy or sell
their stocks based on the performance of the board of directors. It does business with firms that are incorporated or
registered under the company laws of a sovereign state or their subnational provinces. There are four characteristics
that define a modern corporation: [1]
Separate legitimate personality of the corporation (right to prosecute and prosecute in its own name, ie to see the
company as a human being by law).
Limited liability of shareholders (so that if the company goes bankrupt, they will be the debtors of the same money
which they received in exchange for the share.)
Transferable shares (often with a listed exchange, such as the London Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange
or Euronext of Paris)
Paid management, in other words, the control of the company rests with the Board of Directors.
In most developed countries, the board is appointed by both shareholders and employees as representatives to "co-
ordinate" the company's strategies, except in English-speaking countries. Corporate law is often divided into
corporate governance (which is associated with various power relations within the corporation) and corporate
finance (which is linked to the use of capital).
In Germany, §76 AKTG also says the same about the management board, while under §111 AKTG, the role of the
Board of Supervision has been described as monitoring (überwachen). In the United Kingdom, the right of
management is not given under the law, rather it is found in article 2 of the model articles. This means that it is a
default law that companies can adopt by reserving rights for members (s.20 CA 2006), although it is rarely done by
companies. UK law reserves the rights and duties of shareholders to approve transactions of a large non-cash asset
(s.190 CA 2006), which means non-cash assets that the company has Be more than 10% of the value or at least £
5,000 and a maximum of £ 100,000. [19] Similar laws, although much less stringent, are also given in §271 DGCL
and in German law under the so-called Holzmüller-Doktrin. [20]
Probably the essential fundamental guarantee given by the directors in the interest of the members is that they, that
is, the directors, can be easily removed. During the Great Depression, two Harvard scholars, Adolf Burle (and
Gardiner Means, attacked US laws by creating The Modern Corporation and Private Property that failed to hold
directors accountable, as well as by this book He linked the economic crisis with the increasing power and autonomy

13813 www.ijariie.com 1716

Vol-5 Issue-4 2019 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396

of directors. In the UK, the right to remove directors by a general majority has been ensured by members under
s.168 CA 2006 [21] In addition, the article articles model- According to 20. One-third of the members of the Board
of Directors have to submit for redemption every year (thus they have a maximum tenure of three years). 10% of the
number of shareholders can be called to call a meeting at any time and If a year has passed since the last meeting,
5% of the shareholders can also make such a demand (s.303 CA 2006). In Germany, where the board has felt the
need to be more permanent due to staff participation, § 84 (3) AktG provides that the directors of the Board of
Management are of any importance. For the entire reason (ein wichtiger Grund), it can only be removed by the
Board of Supervisors, although this includes the motion of no confidence motion by the shareholders. If 75% of the
shareholders do not vote against the directors, then they have a term of five years. According to §122 AktG, 10% of
shareholders can call for a meeting. In the United States, directors are given considerable autonomy by Delaware.
According to §141 (k) DGCL, if the board is not 'classified', the directors can be removed without any reason which
means that the directors are reappointed year after year. If the board is classified, the directors cannot be removed
unless there is a large-scale irregularity. Further, §216 DGCL has looked at the autonomy of directors from the point
of view of shareholders which allows for plurality voting and §211 (d) states that shareholders' meetings can only be
convened when. The constitution should allow it. [22] The problem is that the decision to corporatize the company
in the US is usually taken by the directors and §242 (b) (1) DGCL states that any constitutional amendment should
be proposed by the directors. In contrast, the constitution can be amended at any time by 75% of shareholders in
Germany (§179 AktG) and the UK (s.21 CA 2006 [23]).
Cases
VB Rangaraj v. VB Gopalakrishnan AIR 1992 SC 453: The family consisting of two brothers Baluswami Naidu and
Guruvayya Naidu is the owner of a private organization, which is the sole investor of the organization, measures of
appropriation of proposals among them. They went on a verbal assurance, that each branch of the family would
certainly maintain the level with the number of offers and that if either part of the two branches wanted to offer its
offers, it would give the primary option of purchase. . The person of that branch and if the offer was refused, the
offers would be sold to others.
Bates v. Standard Land Company (1910) 2 Ch 408 271: Where the organization is a man, the questions come before
the court. It was held that the organization is a built person who acts through the top managerial staff selected by the
investors and is the main mind and mind of the organization, which is the body. An organization can function mostly
through them only.
Recommendation
A viable salary framework is a basic tool for the execution of proprietary controls. The reason for the salary
structure is to expand the board, dedication and dedication of various administrators to advance the interests of the
organization and its investors. Regardless of the salary required, the remuneration framework provides, among other
things, related motivational schemes, annuity plans, compensation in the form of proposals, and related pay
structures.
Conclusion
It is a system of structure, operation and control of the company with a view to achieving long-term strategic goals,
so as to satisfy environmental and local community needs in addition to the satisfaction of shareholders, creditors,
employees, consumers and suppliers and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
The SEBI Committee (India) Report on Corporate Governance defines corporate governance as the acceptance by
management of shareholders' non-negotiable rights as de facto owners of the corporation and as their trustee on
behalf of shareholders. It is concerned with the commitment to values, ethical business conduct and distinguishing
between private and corporate funds in the management of a company. "This definition is derived from the
Gandhian Principles of Trustees and the Directive Principles of the Indian Constitution. Corporate Governance
Conduct and Ethics It is seen as a duty. According to Prof. Vrajalal Sapoivadia, corporate governance is to sacrifice
personal interest for the sake of the society and the interest of the institution is to sacrifice for the society. “Any
corporate body can operate only through agents and of course, it is the duty of those agents to promote the interests
of the corporations for which they are working. The duty of such agents is in the nature of a trustee towards their
master. And it is a universally applicable rule that a person performing such duties will not agree to enter into such
agreements in which he has or is likely to have a conflict of interest or his interests conflict with the interests of such
people To whom he has to protect ... This principle is so strictly followed that no truth or falsity can be questioned in
the contract concerned. " The members of a company usually have rights against each other and against the
company as mentioned in the constitution of the company. As far as the exercise of their rights is concerned,
minority shareholders usually have to accept that they cannot interfere with the overall control of the company due
to their limited voting rights, and they must make a majority decision (majority rule). Have to agree. However, a
majority decision can be unjust, especially when a shareholder is the judge. Companies usually raise capital for their

13813 www.ijariie.com 1717

Vol-5 Issue-4 2019 IJARIIE-ISSN(O)-2395-4396

business by debt or equity. The capital collected through equity is usually acquired by issuing shares (sometimes
called "stock" (this is not a stock traded)) or raised by warrant.
A share is a type of asset and can be sold or transferred. By holding shares, the person becomes a member of the
company concerned and he has the right to make reference to the company and its other members according to the
constitution of the company. The share has a face value which indicates the extent of shareholder's liability in
repayment of the company's debts in the event of the company's bankruptcy. It is in any case, as envisaged under the
Companies Act, 2013 and the organization's constitution, to investigate the unbridled forces of the Board of
Directors. By nature, value investors are faint-hearted associates, not dissatisfied crusaders, and this annoys the
investor. They can vote with their feet if the administration and even individual financial experts have a tendency to
neglect right-to-authorized activities. Be that as it may, given the ongoing strategy pattern for great corporate
governance, part of the board of directors is to make sure to choose the center based on the organization of free
chiefs; Banks and money-related establishments may still remain cognizable patrons. Speculators' Assurance
Association Particle and Intermediate Alert firms have a different role in establishing the way of life of an investor.
References
[1]. “Corporate Governance in India and the UK Compared.” n.d. Grant Thornton UK LLP. Accessed June 9,
2018. https://www.grantthornton.co.uk/en/insights/corporategovernance-in-india-and-the-uk-a-comparative-
analysis/.
[2]. Lessambo, F. 2016. The International Corporate Governance System: Audit Roles and Board Oversight.
Springer.
[3]. Mäntysaari, Petri. 2006. Comparative Corporate Governance: Shareholders as a Rule-Maker. Springer
Science & Business Media. 8. Moore, Marc, and Martin Petrin. 2017. Corporate Governance: Law,
Regulation and Theory. Mac millan International Higher Education.
[4]. Listing rule 10 for public companies, setting a criterion of transactions for which approval and disclosure of
shareholder is required.
[5]. According to the Bundesgerichtshof, all shareholders will approve the sale of assets up to 80% of the value of
the company.
[6]. C.F. Bashel vs Faith and inquire about whether the decisions will still be taken in the same way.
[7]. See also SEC 13d-5; When a group of investors was considered an important political / producer association,
it is believed that any 5% shareholder vote clause should be registered with the Federal Financial Authority -
the Security and Exchange Commission.
[8]. Although the Constitution allows a particular provision to be further "instituted", s.22; Again, Article 3 of the
Model Articles, 75% of the members of the general meeting are allowed to give special instructions to the
directors.
[9]. Harlows Naumine's Tea Versus Woodside (1968) 121 CLR 483 (Aust HC)
[10]. Foss v. Harboutle (1843) 2 hair 461
[11]. In England, Ibrahimi vs Westbourne Galleries [1973] AC 360
[12]. 9. Nath, Pradipta. 2017. “Corporate Governance and Shareholder Activism - iPleaders.” iPleaders. iPleaders.
December 26, 2017. https://blog.ipleaders.in/shareholderactivism-corporate-governance/.
[13]. 11.Raja, Vinay. n.d. “Important Caselaws on Company Law.” CAclubindia. Accessed June 9, 2018.
https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/important-caselaws-on-companylaw-7630.asp.
[14]. Dr.Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S “In Vitro Evaluation of Anticariogenic Activity of Acacia Catechu against
Selected Microbes”, International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, Volume No.
3 , Issue No. 3, P.No 20-25, March 2018
[15]. Trishala A , Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S,“ Physicochemical profile of Acacia catechu bark extract –An In
vitro study”, International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, Volume No. 3 ,
Issue No. 4, P.No 26-30, April 2018.
[16]. Sarkar, Jayati, and Subrata Sarkar. 2012. Corporate Governance in India. SAGE Publications India.
[17]. Shagunbahl. 2017. “Corporate Governance under the Companies Act, 2013 - iPleaders.” iPleaders. iPleaders.
October 10, 2017.
[18]. https://blog.ipleaders.in/corporategovernance-companies-act-2013/.
[19]. 16.Shepherd, Chris, and Ann Ridley. 2015. Company Law. Routledge.
[20]. 20.Verma, Vivek Kumar. n.d. “Companies Act 2013.” Accessed June 9, 2018.
https://indiancaselaws.wordpress.com/category/corporate-law/companies-act-2013/.
[21]. “Website.” n.d. Accessed June 9, 2018. http://www.granthornto.co.uk.
[22]. 22.Wen, Shuangge. 2013. Shareholder Primacy and Corporate Governance: Legal Aspects, Practices and
Future Directions. Routledge.

13813 www.ijariie.com 1718