You are on page 1of 37

Sandstone Acidizing

Fluid Selection
Sandstone Acidizing Design
Retarded Mud Acids

Copyright 2009 NExT, All rights reserved


Sandstone Acidizing design
 Any acid formulation design must take into account obviously the
type of rock and damage to tackle but as well:
• Corrosion of completion equipment: T°C & metallurgy
• The inherent presence of free iron in the borehole and the
necessity to complex it to avoid highly damaging precipitates
• The compatibility between the acid and the hydrocarbon: risk
of emulsions, sludges, or precipitates
• The accessibility of the rock by the acid: need for surface
active agents to water wet matrix
• The carrying capacity of fine particles during clean up
• …etc
2
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Introduction

Treatment design involves following requirements:

 Selection of acid type & concentration


 Selection of type & amount of additives
 Volumes of preflush, main acid mixture and postflush
 Injection rate schedules of preflush, main acid and postflush
 Placement of acid
 Treatment execution
 Treatment monitoring

3
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
3
Composition of Sandstone Minerals

4
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Fluid selection Outline

 Hydrochloric acid
 Hydrofluoric acid systems
• Mud Acid
• Retarded Mud Acid
 Special treatments for special cases

5
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Acid Selection

 Based primarily on field experience


 Perform laboratory tests of response of cores to different acid
systems for more careful selection of optimal acid
 Standard treatment: 15 wt% HCl preflush followed with 3 wt%
HF, 12 wt% HCl mixture (called “Mud Acid”)
 Recent trend toward lower concentration HF:
• Reduces damaging precipitates
• Lessens risk of unconsolidation of formation around wellbore

6
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
6
HCl Preflush
HCl Fluid Selection Guide for All Temperatures

>100 md 20-100 md <20 md

<10% silt and <10% clay 15X 10X 7.5X

all other combinations of


silt and clay composition 10X 7.5X 5X

4-6% chlorite/glauconite, use <20md Guidelines with 5% Acetic Acid


6-8% chlorite/glauconite, use 10% Acetic Acid preflush to Mud Acid + 5% Acetic Acid
>8% chlorite/glauconite, use 10% Acetic Acid and Organic Mud Acid
<2% Zeolite, use 10% Acetic Acid in all HCl systems
2-5% Zeolite, use 10% Acetic Acid preflush
>5% Zeolite, contact Regional Tech Center

7
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Mud acid formulation

 Old time: high HF concentrations used for all sandstone


 Mid 80’s HF concentration was decreased for several
reasons (SLB- McLeod):
• High porosity
• Temperature increase
• Permeability increase: deconsolidation
• And latter type of clay
 Mid 90’s
• Optimum ratio between HCl and HF (Hal: Gdanski)
• Organic Mud acid
8
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Acid Selection: Main Guideline For Main Acid

McLeod (1984) guidelines

9
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Updated Acid Selection Guidelines

10
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Fluid Selection for Mud Acid Fluids

For temperature >200°F : perform long core flow test to acess treatment

11
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with < 2% Zeolites*
> 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 8% HCl/2% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 9% HCl/1% HF with 5% Acetic 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF with 5% Acetic
Other 9% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic

Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with 2 -5% Zeolites*


> 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 8% HCl/2% HF with 10% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 10% Acetic
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 9% HCl/1% HF with 10% Acetic 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF with 10% Acetic
Other 9% HCl/1.5% HF with 10% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 10% Acetic

Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with >5% Zeolites*


> 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 10% Citric/2% HF 10% Citric/1.5% HF
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 10% Citric/1% HF 10% Citric/0.5% HF
Other 10% Citric/1.5% HF 10% Citric/1% HF

*10% Acetic Acid PF/OF

12
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with < 4% Chlorite/Glauconite
> 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 6% HCl/1.5% HF 6% HCl/1.5% HF
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF
Other 6% HCl/1% HF 6% HCl/1% HF

Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with 4 - 6% Chlorite/Glauconite


> 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 8% HCl/2% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 9% HCl/1% HF with 5% Acetic 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF with 5% Acetic
Other 9% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1% HF with 5% Acetic

Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with 6% - 8% Chlorite/Glauconite*


> 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 8% HCl/2% HF with 10% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 10% Acetic
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 9% HCl/1% HF with 10% Acetic 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF with 10% Acetic
Other 9% HCl/1.5% HF with 10% Acetic 6% HCl/1% HF with 10% Acetic

Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with >8% Chlorite/Glauconite*


> 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 9% Formic Acid /1.5% HF 9% Formic Acid /1.5% HF
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 9% Formic Acid/0.5% HF 9% Formic Acid/0.5% HF
Other 9% Formic Acid/1% HF 9% Formic Acid/1% HF
* 10% Acetic Acid PF/OF

13
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Acid Volume Selection

 Selection of optimal acid volume complicated by competing


factors:
• depends strongly on depth of damaged zone
• However, need larger amount to ensure acid contacts most of
formation, depending on acid placement technique
 Design is very imprecise
 Recommended approach is to select a target acid volume
based on model of acidizing process
 Conduct treatment in such a manner than it can be optimized
“on the fly”

14
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
14
Laboratory Testing for Optimal Acid
Selection
 ARC test
Particularly useful for new formation or when many wells will be
treated in a particular formation
• Short core
– Consists of flowing acid through a small core while monitoring
permeability response from pressure drop
– Compare plot of permeability of core as a function of acid
throughput in pore volumes (“acid response curve”)
 Should only be used as guideline for field treatment
• Long core
– Experiments reflect more accurately field conditions (but
expensive and difficult)
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
15

15
Typical Acid Response Curve

 Lower strength HF yields less damage in early stages


 Conservative treatment would select the low concentration
16
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
16
Sandstone Acidizing

 Methods to prepare Mud Acid


• Dissolving Ammonium Bifluoride in HCl solution:
NH4HF2 + (2+1) HCl 2 HF + HCl + NH4CI
 to generate 1000 gallons (1 M3) 12-3 Mud acid :
15% HCL + 400 lbs (48 kg) NH4HF2
• Blending 20% HF solution to HCl
• Blending 25% HCl - 20% HF solution with Water or HCl

17
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Acidizing stimulation techniques

Fluid Selection
Sandstone Acidizing Design
Retarded Mud Acids

Copyright 2009 NExT, All rights reserved


Volumes

For a 20% porosity Sandstone


 OH 6″
• A penetration of 1 ft (33cm) needs 7.05 gal/ft (90 L/m)
• A penetration of 5 ft (165cm) needs 183.32 gal/ft (2275 L/m)

 OH 8″ ½
• A penetration of 1 ft (33cm) needs 8.02 gal/ft (100 L/m)
• A penetration of 5 ft (165cm) needs 189.26 gal/ft (2350 L/m)

19
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Typical HF acid treatment

 Non acid preflush:


To break down the formation NON-ACID
HCl
PREFLUSH
WITH
or as a buffer with formation fluids PREFLUSH
ADDITIVES
(brine, oil)
 Acid preflush: STEP #1 STEP #2

Physical barrier between HF and


HF ACID OVERFLUSH
formation fluid. WITH
ADDITIVES
WITH
SURFACTANT
 HF treatment:
Treat the matrix STEP #3 STEP #4

 Overflush:
RECOVER
Push away the treatment and any precipitate TREATING
FLUIDS

 Flowback:
Should be accomplished as soon as possible
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
STEP #5 20
Treatment Sequences : 1 - Preflush
Objective : displace formation water or completion brine
avoid precipitates between HF with K+ Ca2+ Na+
 Remove salt precipitates if any
 Remove carbonates
Fluid used:
 NH4Cl 3 to 5% brine
 HCl 5 to 15 % + specific additives (Aromatic or mutual solvant)
 Acetic acid + NH4Cl
Volume
 50 to 75 % of main treatment
 High clay = higher volume

21
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
HCl Preflush

 Prevent precipitation of species by


• Dissolving carbonate minerals
• Displacing divalent cations from near-wellbore
• Lowering pH around wellbore
 Preflush volume selected by assuming a distance to have all
carbonates removed
 Common to remove carbonate 1 ft from wellbore
 Conservative design as HCl in main acid will continue to
dissolve carbonates ahead of live HF

22
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
22
HCl Preflush Design

 Preflush volumes as small as 25 gal/ft ensure live HF will not


contact regions of high pH (Hill et al. (1991))
 Some HCl will be consumed by ion exchange with clays, so
appropriate to use excess volume of preflush above needed
for carbonate dissolution (Gdanski and Peavy (1986))
 Sometimes injectivity cannot be established with HCl, hence
no preflush
 Successful well responses without HCl preflush reported for
wells with very high skin effects which did not respond well to
conventional treatments using a preflush (Paccaloni and
Tambini (1990))

23
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
23
Treatment Sequences : 2 – Main treatment

Objective
 increase pore throat and transport additives to
decrease the damage
Fluid used
 Mud acid ; HF strength according to mineralogy,
temperature and clay content
 Lab test to perform in a new formation
 Be careful with the cut and paste method

24
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Treatment Sequences: 2 - Main treatment
 Volume : depth of damage and required treatment

 Optimum volume :
 acid placement simulator

 field experience, rule of thumb and acid HF concentration

• 3% 100 gal/ft to 40 gal/ft - 1.2 to 0.5 m3/m


• 1.5% 150 gal/ft to 40 gal/ft - 1.8 m3/m
• 1% 200 gal/ft to 40 gal/ft- 2.5 m3/m
Can be as low as 40 gallons per foot for a perforation damage
Can be optimized afterwards from the job evaluation
25
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Treatment Sequences: 3 - Overflush
 To displace acid from tubing and wellbore
 Moves precipitates farther from wellbore so less damaging
Displace treatment away from the well bore: at > 3ft
Keep near well bore pH acidic
 Variety of fluids have been used: HCl, diesel, ammonium
chloride (NH4Cl) solutions,
 Oil Wells: NH4CI / Weak HCl / Diesel + mutual solvent
 Gas Wells: NH4CI / Weak HCl

26
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Overflush design
 Overflush composition
 Surfactant / Mutual solvent
• Leave formation water-wet
• Facilitate flowback
 Nitrogen
• promote flowback in low pressure wells
 Volume 1 to 1.5 the main treatment volume
 5% HCl + mutual solvent

 Large volume overflush : combination HCl, diesel or NH4Cl


27
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Treatment sequences: 4 - Flowback

 Recommendations:
As soon as possible

Common Practice: energized Fluids

Water Injectors: do not flowback, start injection


immediately
Exception with some retarded acid (Clay acid)

28
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Do not forget: Know the well fluid

 It is very important to know the fluid produced as well as the


compatibility of the acid with these fluids: all fluids should be
tested for compatibility with live/spent acid in emulsion and
sludge tests
 Completion fluids used could also be incompatible
 It is important to know the well parameters: BHST, surface
and BH pressures, and type of completion. The type of fluid
and additives will depend on the BHST
 Pressures and type of completion become important when
we consider acid placement and diversion
29
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Do not forget : Acid Placement

If you are treating a long heterogeneous interval: perform some


diversion: mechanical (packer and balls) , viscous slugs,
foam, particles
Example
• Preflush
100 md x 10 ft
• Main treatment
• Overflush
20 md x 50 ft •Balls Sealers
• Preflush
• Main treatment
5 md x 200 ft • Overflush

30
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Do not forget : Preparation

 Always perform a pickling of the tubing prior the


treatment.
 Bull heading in an old tubing without a circulation
tubing cleaning can be a disaster
 Filtrate all the fluids which will be injected
 Check the flow back circuit
 Special equipment is required to prevent spent acid
spillage offshore

31
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Example 3: Preflush Volume Design

Calculate the volume of 15 wt% HCl preflush needed to


dissolve all carbonate minerals to a distance of 1 ft beyond the
tip of a 6 in long, 0.25 in diameter perforation if there are 12
shots/ft. Well is cased in 7”. The density of acid solution is 1.07
g/cm3. The formation contains 5 vol% CaCO3 and no other HCl-
soluble minerals and has an initial porosity of 0.2. The density
of CaCO3 is 2.71 g/cm3.

32
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
32
Acidizing stimulation techniques

Fluid Selection
Sandstone Acidizing Design
Retarded Mud Acids

Copyright 2009 NExT, All rights reserved


Retarded Mud acid Formulations

• Retarded HCl:HF formulation using Fluoboric Acid


• Inhibits fines migration
• Act as a Clay stabilizer
• Limited HF available ==> deeper penetration
• Reduced probability of precipitation
• On the market
• BJ: Sandstone acid
• Schlumberger: Clay acid and XE 104
• Halliburton: Fines control Acid, Volcanic acid
34
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Special Systems for Special Cases

• Drilling mud damage removal • Acid sensitive formations


systems • Water sensitive formations
• Alcohol based acids • Gas wells/tight formations
• Organic acids • High corrosion environments
• Non-acidic solvents • High sludge tendencies
• Sour well acids • Recovery of whole mud

35
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Acid formulation design summary

Any acid formulation design must consider:


 The type of rock and the damage to tackle
 But as well:
 corrosion of completion equipment: Temperature & metallurgy
 the inherent presence of free iron in the borehole and the necessity
to complex it to avoid highly damaging precipitates
 the compatibility between acid and hydrocarbon: risk of emulsions,
sludges, or precipitates
 the accessibility of the rock by the acid: need for surface active
agents to water wet matrix
 the carrying capacity of fine particles during clean up
 …etc
36
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved
Summary

 Acid formulation selection


• Maximizes stimulation effect
• Minimizes collateral damage
• Optimizes cost
 Neat acids and brines are used for pre- and over-flushes
 Mud Acid is a mixture of HCl and HF optimized for the
Mineralogy, the Temperature and the Permeability
 Retarded mud acids are very effective in removing
formation damage and stabilizing formation fines.

37
Copyright 2009, NExT, All rights reserved

You might also like