1

Organizational Sector Analysis

Team French Fries

College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University

OGL355: Leading Organizational Innovation and Change

Dr. B

March 1, 2021
 2

ROW BUSINESS/FOR- NON-PROFIT/ PUBLIC/

PROFIT CHARITY GOVERNMENT

Chase/Sebastian Tanya/Chris Jordan/Brittny

1.Sector Competition for Competition for Competition for budget,

Environment sales, substitute donations, substitute elected officials, party

goods, short-range services, medium-range politics, long-range view,

view, the rapid pace view, the moderate pace the slow pace of change,

of change, the high of change, limited very low authority to

authority to change authority to change change things, external

things, proactive things, decentralized reactive decision-making

 3

decision-making decision- making

authority

2. Team Name The Six Pack Team Peaceful Park Rangers Consulting

and Org Name

Ford Motor Company Ronald McDonald National Aeronautics and

House Charities Space Administration

(RMHC) (NASA)

3.List Aspect Competition of Sales Medium range view Competition for budget

Matches from
Substitute goods Limited authority to Party politics
Row 1
change things
Short-range view Elected officials

The rapid pace of

Long-range view
change
External reactive
High authority to
decision-making
change things

Proactive decision-

making authority

4. List Aspect N/A Competition for The slow pace of change

Non-Matches donations
Very low authority to
 4

from Row 1 Substitute services change things

Moderate pace change

Decentralized decision

making

5. What is the Due to the ongoing The biggest The largest environmental

biggest demand for products, environmental driver of driver is being

strategy would be the
environmental there is a high government-funded.
financial strength of a
driver of volume of There is not much
community, nation, or
strategy in each competition among competition in terms of
area of emphasis that non-
sector shown businesses. In order budget but, for example,
profit / charities seek to
above? Why? for businesses to NASA customers care
support. Environmental
succeed, they must be that they would be willing
factors such as
competitive with competition from new
to pay more for their

their prices, but to entrants and substitute safety so therefore it will

also be focused on products are always not affect their budget.

their research and present due to the unique

The future will include
development in order aspects of non-profit /
more diversity therefore
charity organizations.
to continue
more women will be
While issues of need can
 5

competing in their exist in a limited elected officials.

market while spectrum, there can be Oftentimes, these have

countless organizations
implementing new two primary levels of
supporting or working
technology and management with an
towards positive solutions
innovations.For agent management level
in various degrees, which
example, In relation in charge of the principal
all compete for a limited
to the Automotive interface responsible for
amount of available
industry, Ford Motor key stakeholders,
resources primarily in the
Company has an including Congress.
form of donations. It’s the
opportunity within resources that non-profit / Focus on more

the global charities are able to secure partnerships and creating

marketplace and the and provide that make the more environmentally

local marketplace to them valuable resources sustainable design, being

and enable them to act in
create eco-friendly that there aren’t too many
the first place. While the
vehicles like more widely government-
way an organization
hybrid vehicles and funded organizations that
receives donations and the
electric vehicles. support the same cause
specific communities can
the pace of change is slow
become restrictive and
because it doesn’t happen
impact the organization’s
frequently.If the decision
potential for growth, the

non-profit / charity could is made to expand to this

not operate if it did not country, it will be

provide a needed resource essential to acknowledge

 6

for an area that could not and embrace how

naturally obtain this advantageous this

resource. This is reflected newfound understanding
in RMHC's ability to
of culture.
receive donations at only

McDonald’s locations and

via direct donations;

however, programs and

donations overall appear

to come from the same

source which is a limit on

the potential financial

perspectives of the

organization and is then

redistributed in the

organization to impact the

community overall.

6. What is the The biggest The biggest

The biggest
biggest environmental environmental outcome
environmental outcome
environmental outcome strategy in strategy in the non-
strategy in the
outcome the business/ for- profit / charity sector is
public/government sector
strategy in each profit sector is branding. Having a well
 7

is to allocate resources
sector above? developing a known brand which
with maximum economic
Why? marketing plan. This conveys your mission,
and public benefit – often
plan identifies target values and operating
looking towards
audiences and procedures goes a long
generations-long
strategic approaches way in distinguishing
timelines. As this sector is
to reaching them. yourself from the
so vast, even within its
Although most competition. Due to the
own organizations, goals
businesses have some unique field, you have
and strategies can often be
sort of marketing to be able to work with
too broad to accurately
efforts in place, it is limited resources in a
measure in a timely
important to very limited manner in
manner. NASA’s mission
formulate a long-term order to be most
is to, “drive advances in
marketing plan in effective. Being able to
science, technology,
order to reach the distinguish yourself
aeronautics, and space
right audiences, to through branding,
exploration to enhance
ensure that they have allows the organization
knowledge, education,
the largest share of to be more
innovation, economic
voice within their recognizable, gain more
vitality and stewardship
industry, and to access to limited
of Earth” (Blodgett,
effectively resources which in
2018). This sector
communicate return allows the
specializes in obtaining
changes within the organization to do
information, often
business (new
 8

through original research,

products, changes to more.
sharing findings, and
current products, etc).
leveraging this to create

The reason this is the long lasting positive

biggest impacts for its citizens

environmental and often the world.

outcome strategy is NASA, the EPA, CDC,

because there is and FDA are all examples

normally a large of government

amount of industry organizations that have

rivalry among similar focuses on

businesses which can research and putting

be greatly influenced action to their new

by the amount of understandings.

advertising an

organization decides

to implement.

7. What is the The largest The biggest The biggest threat would

biggest environmental threat environmental threat be something bigger

environmental in this sector appears would be new entrants. coming in place of a huge

threat in each to be connected to As illustrated in the government organization

sector above? competitive rivalry. example, RMHC has a focusing on partnerships,

 9

Why? Using Ford as the very robust and unique expanding marketing

example, there are organization that is strategies to interest a

substantial options already well established variety of consumers,

for substitutes within in their processes. All implementing more

the areas that are relevant sustainable practices. The

business/automotive for threats are low with government can also put

sector that create their orientation around regulations and liabilities

external pressure on competing in place that could

Ford to continuously organizations. If a new potentially affect the

innovate. While the and more robust organization. Access to

threat of substitutes organization was to important resources could

remains moderate for enter in the market with be taken away which is

this sector and in strategies and necessary for an

particular for Ford, techniques that are organization to succeed.

the competition faster at implementation

generated by these and more recognizable,

substitutes creates may lead to an increase

high competitive in the current threat

rivalry within the level of new entrants

industry. but also of substitution

products that

organization brings

with them at the same

 10

time.

The best performance

8. What is the For the Business/For The best performance
measurement of strategy
best profit sector, the best measurement of
in the public/government
performance performance strategy in the non-
sector is ability to meet
measurement measurement of profit / charity sector is
outcomes whilst
of strategy in strategy would be the ability to
maintaining cost-
each sector increased stakeholder continually operate.
effectiveness (Hubler,
above? Why? investment. While operations are
2006). Similarly to a
Stakeholders able to fluctuate in
publicly-traded profit
surrounding an response to changing
organization that responds
organization assist in financial strength and
to stockholders, if faith is
the generation of weaknesses of a
lost, money quickly pulls
revenue that is community, the ability
out. Government sectors
essential towards to continue to operate in
will see this on a larger,
continued growth a capacity that
more volatile scale as
across the automotive continues to provide
there are more
sector. This includes support for the
stakeholders and bigger
customers, community is the best
budgets. According to the
distributors, possible method of
NASA SWOT analysis
suppliers, and measurement. While
presented in Park Rangers
employees which all competing
Consulting Executive
actively shape the organizations and
 11

Presentation, NASA’s
direction and substitute products will
finance management was
profitability of the always exist, the chance
an opportunity, as 30% of
organization in for a single
their budget is being used
question. In order to organization providing
on their projects, with the
adapt to this ongoing complete relief for an
remaining 70% going to
sector development, issue is impossible.
miscellaneous internal
Ford announced a Furthermore, there is no
costs (Alvarez et al.,
plan to invest $29 restriction on the goals
2021). NASA currently
billion through 2025 and level of impact
has a really positive
to reinvent the other organizations
reputation with the
electric vehicle ( The strive to achieve which
American people and
Six Pack et al., 2021). means that measuring
politicians, but if that
This strategy aims to against external
were to falter, their
capture the attention organizations does not
financial losses would be
of stakeholders in the provide an appropriate
more deeply scrutinized
sweeping movement measure of success. The
and funding could be cut.
of electric vehicles only appropriate

penetrating the sector measure can be found

in order to increase in an organization's

stakeholder ability to continue to

investment and operate in the

interest. community they exist

 12

in.

APPROVAL: (sign off with initials by 12pm AZ time 1/30/2021) - plan to

submit by 10 pm 3/1/2021

Name - Chase Jordan- JED Name - Name - Name - Brittny Wales

CWL Tanya Garcia Christopher Sebastian - BMW

- TG A. SSS

Goodermote -

CAG
 13

References

Alvarez, A., Ardary, K., Baxter, A., Powers, L., Ventimiglia, M. (2021, February 24). NASA Executive

Presentation.[PowerPoint slides]. Arizona State University. Student project.

Blodgett, R. (2018, April 20). Our Missions and Values. NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/careers/our-

mission-and-values.

Hunley, B. (2021, February 24). The Six Pack. [PowerPoint slides]. Arizona State University. Student

project.

Hubler, D. (2006, September 6). 4 ways to measure success in the public sector. FCW.

https://fcw.com/articles/2006/09/04/4-ways-to-measure-success-in-the-public-sector.aspx.

Team Peaceful (2021, March 24). Ronald McDonald House Charities Executive Presentation.

[PowerPoint slides]. Arizona State University. Student project.