“ Enabling others to act”

Leaders encourage cooperation and create exciting teams. It involves people actively. Leaders are
conscious of the enormous effort of mutual respect; they try to establish a climate of trust and human
dignity. They strengthen others, enabling everyone to feel strong and able. Mahatma always
encouraged the Indians to work and have a spirit of unison and togetherness. Always to disclose what
they believed was right and not to fear the "white" for that would make them vulnerable. The incident
where he was kicked out of the train made him call for a meeting with other Indians to discuss the issues
that were affecting all the people including racism which was one of his biggest agendas. He believed
equality could be achieved but only the right people guided the rest to achieve that specific goal. Not by
violence, but by the art of each expressing concerns and coming to a consensus with the talk. That is
why he was elected to represent the Muslim revolution in South Africa. Mahatma cared for humanity
and the existence of a peaceful country where people live in harmony and love each other. he
strengthened peoples’ powers by telling them to make themselves clothes instead of buying expensive
clothes that were being sold by the British colony. This made the Indian people believe that they actually
could make it if they worked. Leaders' work makes people feel powerful, capable, knowledgeable, and
connected. Exemplary leaders utilize their influence for others; they are capable of acting, not by
acquiring their authority, but by giving it away. If they have greater discretion, power, and information,
then their energies are far more likely to generate remarkable outcomes that serve the greatest
interests of everybody.

“Encourage the heart”

Encouraging leaders to care for their people while concentrating on the ultimate objective of the team:
outcomes. To care about your staff requires to set clear values and foresee the best. Encouraging
leaders to pay attention to themselves, personalize acknowledgment, communicate success stories and
principles, celebrate together, and set an example to others. It establishes positive labor relations that
enhance productivity. At a personal level, feeling good about the job and achieving feeds commitment,
which in turn contributes to productivity and the final result. Mahatma cherished the economic
independence the Indians had achieved. Industrialization and materialism are what Gandhi identified
with the people. He believed that the people of India should be prioritized instead of economic growth
as envisioned by the British colony. he praised the Indians for what they had achieved. Gandhi
recognized and congratulated the group of Indians who advocated for a non-violent and disobedient
campaign in India. The leader should find a responsible way of encouraging and carrying out the heart.
In the path of vision, the Heart should be fostered. The heart of encouragement is seen where, he
always believed that for change to happen, it must have to come from a strong leader, ready to express
their concerns in the best way and with no violence. Despite him appreciating what people did, he also
had a failure where he failed to recognize Muhammad Ali Jinnah as a leader who wanted to create a
separate Muslim state of Pakistan.

Reflections

Until they are proof of innocence, saints must always be considered guilty, although the standards to
apply in all situations are not the same. In the case of Gandhi, the questions one tends to ask are: How
much vanity has motivated Gandhi and to what degree did he violate the ideals of politics, the very
essence of which is irrespective of force and fraud? To provide a definitive response, one had to
examine the deeds and writings of Gandhi in great depth, because every act was a kind of pilgrimage
throughout his life.

Though British authorities who talked about him with a combination of fun and censure also truly liked
and appreciated him. Nobody ever claimed that he was corrupt, or in any vulgar manner ambitious, or
that what he had done was done through fear or malice. Judge a guy like Gandhi by applying high
criteria intuitively, such that several of its merits are practically missed. For instance, even from his
memoirs the way he died was clear: how he died would have been an example of this to a public person
who placed any importance on his skin.

It is worth remembering that Gandhi began with a young Indian student's regular goals and only took his
radical views graduate and, in certain circumstances, very grudgingly. It was interesting to discover that,
when he donned a high hat, learned Latin and French, climbed up Eiffel Tower, even tried to play the
violin. It's interesting to learn. He was neither one of those Saints who, from infancy on, have been
characterized by their spectacular devotion, or another who abandoned the world after sensational
debauchery. He confesses his young people's sins in detail, although there is not much to be confessed.

I learn that though It was the mode to speak of Gandhi in late years though he not only supported the
left-wing Western motion but was fundamental to that. He was claimed for his own by anarchists and
pacifists, in particular, only seeing that he was against the centralist and violent state, and ignored the
anti-humanistic, worldwide trend of his ideas.

Work cited
Gandhi, Mahatma. Gandhi's autobiography: The story of my experiments with truth. Public Affairs Press,
1954.

Gandhi, Mohandas Karamchand. Autobiography or the story of my experiments with truth. Yale University
Press, 2018.

Malnar, Angelika. "30. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi:[An Autobiography or The Story of My

Experiments with Truth]." Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction. De Gruyter, 2019. 1703-1718.