Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gesualdo Martial
743043
Switzerland
Caux, 2019
Châteaux de Caux
At the time of setting prices, we must have a broader vision, which not only
includes numbers, but factors that directly influence. In these factors we can mention
the importance of calculating profit, optimizing revenue, setting price parameters,
price elasticity, supply and demand, but the most important is the season in which
prices are implemented (Bayoumi et al., 2012).
After analyzing the current market, we understood that by the time we took
over the management of the hotel, it would be in low season. Therefore, we decided
to choose the market strategy called "Maximize Occupation Strategy". In this set up
we had room rates that would go from 120 to 253 Swiss francs.
Taking into consideration all these markets where hard to manage only by the
direct channel, we decided to approach different distribution channels which
benefited from diverse discounts depending on their efficiency, e.g. travel agents
would have 5% and OTA 7%.
Something else that would definitely impact on the rates presented were
location and quantity. For the aspect of location, it was a good advantage to attract
business market because we were in the city center, meaning we could charge more
just for the fact of convenient location and facilities around the hotel. Regarding
quantity, prices would shift depending it they were large or small groups, applying
the economies of scale theory concerning the volume purchase discounts.
The first investments applied to hotel were focused in the services and
facilities, to boost the added value. Our management decisions were always focused
with a futuristic mindset, meaning that we developed on building and refurbishments
not to make the greatest profit right away but build up a space that would run by itself
later on and be more profitable on the nearest future. Within these improvements we
added the business centers, retail shops, travel & tour desk and lobby kiosk. As well
services were improved by adding valet parking, guestroom internet, foreign
exchange, mini bar, concierge, express check in/out, transport van, turndown
service, and music & entertainment. Along with the services and facilities, we
invested as well in the cleaning of common areas we considered as busiest.
As time passed by, the environment shifted to a high season, which having
this in mind and the investments enforced, have us enough reasons to move out
rates the higher prices following the other pricing strategy suggested by the
simulation, which is called “Maximized Rated Strategy”. As we did this, we were able
to play with the price elasticity, shifting prices from 175 to 349 Swiss francs.
Even though developing the building would enhance the customer satisfaction
and overall added value, it has the drawback of needing to hire more staff which
impacts on the profit margin listed by including the new venues.
At the beginning of the simulation we kept low staffing levels, trying to not fall
out on a burnout, significantly making an effect on the net profit. But as the high
season came through, we had to reassure the hotel counted with enough staff to
provide the best services, which in some occasions led us to overstaff.
Moving on to the limitations, since the cycles are every three months, we
cannot adjust in real time all that entails with staff, rates and refurbishment, and we
consider it doesn’t assemble with real life because revenue managers don’t take
decisions once by quarters. This limits us to have a more precise experience and
decision making, and to realize how the dynamic pricing can be something that
changes every day.
Furthermore, it limits our creative thinking when we are not able invest in
ideas we develop and we are limited to what the simulation has available, for
example we wanted to add a new building or decide which kind of furniture to use in
the refurbishments, it is not possible because we can do only what the simulation
indicates, which means it’s even impossible to differentiate from the competition
within our class because every can only reach to a certain and specific amount and
type of improvements and appliances.
Considering bundling, we only had the option of the package rate which
included the room, breakfast, dinner and a bottle of wine. It represented an 8.04% in
the revenues through the year, mostly sold on weekdays. The implementation of this
packages is more attractive if they are customized, but this detail was not possible
within this simulation, meaning there is room for improvement in this area.
I would recommend, in order to make it more detailed and offer more options
to the student to take better decisions, to work month by month instead of quarters,
and then make the overall study approach in quarters and annually.
Moving into another direction, facilitate the options to the student to be more
with where invest the more and work on the hotel differentiation.
Bayoumi, A.E.-M., Saleh, M., Atiya, A.F. and Aziz, H.A. (2012). Dynamic pricing for
hotel revenue management using price multipliers. Journal of Revenue and Pricing
Management, 12(3), pp.271–285.