1. The plaintiff company was wound up by a court order and appointed a liquidator due to insolvency.
2. Financial documents show the plaintiff's assets are far less than its debts, indicating it is unable to pay costs.
3. The defendant requested security for costs from the plaintiff, which was refused, so the defendant is applying to the court to order the plaintiff to post security before proceeding with the action.
Original Description:
samples
Original Title
AFFIDAVIT in support of application for security for costs
1. The plaintiff company was wound up by a court order and appointed a liquidator due to insolvency.
2. Financial documents show the plaintiff's assets are far less than its debts, indicating it is unable to pay costs.
3. The defendant requested security for costs from the plaintiff, which was refused, so the defendant is applying to the court to order the plaintiff to post security before proceeding with the action.
1. The plaintiff company was wound up by a court order and appointed a liquidator due to insolvency.
2. Financial documents show the plaintiff's assets are far less than its debts, indicating it is unable to pay costs.
3. The defendant requested security for costs from the plaintiff, which was refused, so the defendant is applying to the court to order the plaintiff to post security before proceeding with the action.
AFFIDAVIT in support of application for security for costs
[1467]
(Heading as in Form 1)
(Describe the background of the litigation in brief)
1. I state that the Plaintiff was wound up by an order of court
granted on the ________ day of ________ 20___ (the 'Winding Up Order') pursuant to a winding up petition presented by a creditor of the Plaintiff, AB Sdn Bhd on the ________ day of ________ 20___ vide [Petition No ___]. 2. Pursuant to the Winding Up Order, one CD was appointed Liquidator (the 'Liquidator') of the Plaintiff. Now produced and shown to me marked collectively as exhibit 'EX-1' are copies of the Winding Up Order and the Affidavit Verifying Petition affirmed by EF on the ________ day of ________ 20___ with a copy of the Petition exhibited therein. 3. I state that the Plaintiff is impecunious and that there is reason to believe that the Plaintiff will be unable to pay the costs of the Defendant if the Defendant is successful in its defence. I state this for the following reasons:
[Set out merits of defence and facts relating to company's likely
inability to pay costs, for eg:
3.1 Pursuant to the Winding Up Order, the Plaintiff was
compulsorily wound up on the grounds of insolvency. 3.2 The Account of Receipts and Payments in Form 631 dated the ________ day of ________ 20___ (the 'R&Ms' Accounts') lodged by the Receivers and Managers with the Registry of Companies shows that as at the ________ day of________ 20___, the estimated value of the assets of the Plaintiff was RM28,000.00 whereas the amount owing by the Plaintiff to its secured creditors was RM 10,300,500.00. Now produced and shown to me is a copy of the R&Ms' Accounts marked as exhibit 'EX–2'. 3.3 The Liquidator's Accounts of Receipts and Payments and Statement of the position on the Winding Up in Form 752 dated the ________ day of ________ 20___ (collectively referred to as the 'Liquidator's Accounts') lodged by the Liquidator with the Registry of Companies show that the Liquidator has declared by way of statutory declarations dated the ________ day of ________ 20___ (collectively referred to as the 'Liquidator's Declarations') that the Liquidator has not, nor has any other person by his order or for his use during the period from (state period) received or paid any moneys on account of the Plaintiff. Now produced and shown to me marked collectively as exhibit 'EX–3' are copies of the Liquidator's Accounts and the Liquidator's Declarations.]
4. In light of the above and as the Plaintiff is clearly
impecunious, I state that no benefit whatsoever would accrue to the Plaintiff or its creditors even if the Plaintiff succeeds in its claim herein. The Plaintiff's claim which is brought by the Liquidator herein therefore does not serve any useful purpose and is without merit. 5. Further, I state that as the Plaintiff is in liquidation and this action is brought by the Liquidator on behalf of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff ought to have known, anticipated and been prepared to provide security for the Defendant's costs of this action pursuant to the Companies Act 1965.3 6. I therefore state that in light of all the circumstances of the case, it would not be in the interests of justice for the Plaintiff to be allowed to proceed with this action herein without first providing security for the Defendant's costs of this action. 7. I state that the Defendant had requested that the Plaintiff provide security for the First Defendant's costs of this action in the sum of RM_____, by way of a letter dated the ________ day of ________ 20___ from the Defendant's solicitors to the Plaintiff's solicitors. Now produced and shown to me marked as exhibit 'EX–4' is a copy of the said letter dated the ________ day of ________ 20___ . 8. I state that the First Defendant's request for security for costs has been refused pursuant to a letter dated the ________ day of ________ 20___ from the Plaintiff's solicitors to the First Defendant's solicitors. Now produced and shown to me marked as exhibit 'EX-5' is a copy of the said letter dated the ________ day of ________ 20___ . 9. There is now produced and shown to me marked as exhibit 'EX-6' a detailed and itemised account prepared by the Defendant's solicitors of the costs, including counsel's fees, which (a) have been incurred up to the filing of the Defendant's Security For Costs Application and (b) it is estimated will be incurred in the future conduct of the action on the Defendant's behalf.4 10. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Plaintiff be ordered to provide security for the Defendant's costs of the action in the sum of RM________ and that pending the provision of such security the action be stayed. 11. I therefore humbly pray that the Defendant's Security For Costs Application herein be allowed with costs.
(Conclude as in Form 4)
1 The Companies Regulations 1966 (PU 173/66) Form 63.
2 The Companies Regulations 1966 (PU 173/66) Form 75. 3 Ie the Companies Act 1965 (Act 125) s 351. 4 It is desirable for an itemised account or a draft bill of cost to be annexed to the affidavit: Sloyan & Sons (Builders) Ltd v Brothers of Christian Instruction [1974] 3 All ER 715 at 720 per Lane J.