5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss.

– justiniandeception

justiniandeception
Principles of TRUST-LAW Governance being: Master SERVANT (SLAVERY) arrangement.

Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate

Governments and the DOG-LATIN
effect. The Poison in the Gloss.

The Science Of English: (Grammar) May Over-

Rule All Presumptions. (False impressions)
1  This is an interesting insight into how foreign, private corporate
governments are deceiving the people of the western world into a “not
guilty plea” when the guilty plea may be the only grammatically
correct thing to do. It appears that this governing system is meant for the
ignorant and illiterate in order to control such masses. No matter how
much we try and fight the system for its crimes against you, if you are
ignorant to the grammatical rules of the written text used on documents,
you will never beat such a system. You have been DOGGED by the Egyptian
DOG-MAN-SYMBOL: Anubis, Egyptian Gods of the UNDERWORLD.

https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 1/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

Anubis, one of the Gods of the Underworld, in

charge of preserving the body on the slim chance
that the dead come back to life. the DOG-LATIN
text is found on the tomb stones of a grave. Dog
Latin is the “engraved image” on the tomb, the
written text of the dead. It is debased Latin,
appearing as a written sign language without the
hyphens. Written Sign, subject to the grammatical
rules of Latin, appears in ALL UPPERCASE TEXT
LIKE THIS.

2  This concept is in relation to the DOG-LATIN find, being the

debased Latin text appearing on Governmental documents. It very well
may work like this:
3  DOG-LATIN: Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition:
Inline image 2

4  Proper Latin (SIGN) appears “IN-THIS-HYPHENATED-FORMAT”, under the

correct grammatical rules of LATIN-TEXT: Identified in the: Chicago Manual of
Styles, Sixteenth Edition: FOREIGN LANGUAGES: 11:147, Sample Given.

https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 2/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

5  “WHEN THIS TYPE OF ALL UPPERCASE TEXT APPEARS ON A

DOCUMENT”  being what appears to be “Dog Latin”, (Latin all uppercase
text appearing under the grammatical rules of English) such a text does
not destroy the vitality of such a document! Refer to GRAMMA FALSA NON
VITATE CHARTAM: Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition: (Below). It is
saying that the document “Is what it is” in its grammatical standing,
meaning, that the document is grammatically saying nothing when such a
document is appearing in the corrupt “DOG-LATIN” text. The fact stands
as stating that the bad grammar does not destroy such a document, it
renders such a document as it “grammatically” stands. Another way to
look at it is that its true correct grammatical meaning is telling you that
such a document is what it is, it is not destroyed, . (If the writer constructs a
bad grammatical document, the document is not bad, it appears as
https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 3/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

it grammatically appears, such a dogged document is a reflection of the the poor

ability of the “bad” writer of such a document, or an act of the writer to deceive his
fellow man by using grammatical tricks in order to hide something).
When: “Commonwealth Of Australia“, appears on paper as:
“COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA” the grammatical fact is saying that
its translation into English appears as: “Commonwealth. Of. Australia.”
and not: “Commonwealth Of Australia”. (Notice the full stops) Only an
ignorant false impression would render such a presumption as the true
correct: “Commonwealth Of Australia” (This will apply to all
western nations.) Be aware that a clever grammatical writer may have the
grammatical ability to write a document that gives a false impression of
something that grammatically does not exist in fact. Such a false
impression tendered as something other than what it truly is, could be
deemed as a counterfeit if one is attempting to “Pass it Off” as something
other than its grammatical facts. A counterfeit is simply the act of passing
something off that is false for something that is real.

6  So where is the “deception” one may ask, when its not in the grammar?
The deception relates to the “false impression” that a document
appearing in DOG-LATIN, (Or contains ALL UPPERCASE TEXT usurped
into such a document) is something other than what it truly appears to be.
If the reader assumes such a document to be something other than the
grammatical fact, than such a reader’s “ignorance” to English Grammar is
his own downfall in defining the grammatical facts appearing on such a
document. (The Grammatical standing of the document is always what it
is) Ones ignorance is ones downfall. Ignorance is no excuse in law and if
you “ignorantly” assume that you can read, when in fact your grammatical
ability may be poor, than you may be in danger by being subject to the
grammatical ability of those that possess an immoral intention in order
to deceive the ignorant masses into assuming such a false document to be
true… As you can see, its never the fault of the document itself, the fault
appears with the ignorant perception of such a document.
Don’t forget, this is also a warning against the one who constructs such a

https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 4/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

DOGGED document that contains a foreign text for immoral purpose, the
risk of a clever grammatical writer constructing such a document that
intends to deceive, falls upon the one that constructed such a document,
meaning, he who creates owns, rendering the author of such a deceptive
document to be the one liable for it in the end.
Who would have ever assumed that “THIS TYPE OF ALL UPPERCASE TEXT
WAS NOT ENGLISH”. People have become so ignorant that they will even
argue the point that THIS TEXT IS ENGLISH, and why? because they
“assume” that they can read it! …. however, grammatically, it reads as
something other than what is normally assumed, such all upper case text
is a symbolic text, its a “sign” and in relation to article 11:147 of the
Chicago Manual of Styles, such all uppercase text is American Sign
Language, without the hyphens between each word (SIGN), rendering such
all uppercase text “APPEARING LOOKING LIKE THIS” to be the debased
immoral criminal: Dog Latin.

Why Courts love the “Not Guilty Plea”

Not Guilty, creates the “Conflict”, giving the foreign corporate State,

(Your quasi corporate foreign government) the ability to engage in War.
(Warrant: War-Rant) … Not Guilty, is an “acceptance” of the charge and
an intention to “Defend” rendering such a governing state to assume that
you have accepted the corrupt charge, dogged in Dog Latin, and that you
intend to defend it. The Guilty Plea, forces the State to prove its charge
against you to be valid, causing the State to be subjected to the “Error in
the name”.  No “charge” can be issued to a “creditor”, its impossible! …
Only a “debtor” can accept the charge in a corporate governing system. If
the debtor becomes aware that such a charge is corrupt, such a charge will
fall back upon the one that created it so the “not guilty” plea saves the
state from its own fraud.
7  If the Courts and the Enforcement agencies of such courts start to
enforce the wrong presumption of a grammatical fact of a document, than
the court is making the error, it is uttering, by tendering a false
document and as long as the court knows that the defendant is ignorant of
https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 5/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

such an error, the court needs a “Not Guilty Plea” in relation to a

grammatically DOGGED document in order to safely proceed without risk.
The “not guilty plea” is your ignorant “acceptance” of the error
confirmed by your acceptance that you intend to defend. The plea of “not
guilty” is the consent that you agree to the false presumption of
the content of the charge sheet and you agree to defend the “Presumed”
charge. (The charge, dogged in DOG-LATIN, grammatically does not exist)
however, if your understood the true  grammatical appearance of such a
document, your guilty plea is simply saying that you are guilty to nothing,
because, grammatically speaking, the charge never existed.
7B:  The not “guilty plea” also gives the presumption that you agree to be
governed and adjudicated by such a private foreign corporate banking
system (Tribunal) alien to your true de-jure common law government. Its
Treason in the true fact but lucky for you, you were unaware that such a
foreign private corporate government has secretly usurped itself into your
real common law government and has deceived you into the false
presumption that your government is real when in fact it is a foreign
criminal counterfeit. This has been done by keeping you illiterate and
ignorant to the true rules of your own written language, grammar and its
Latin roots.

Crime of Uttering:

 8  If you are forced to act as a defendant of a foreign corporate

“charge” against your will (Coercion) and then make the plea as “guilty”,
or “Guilty to the Fact”, than the court must determine if the one pleading
is aware of the grammatical standing “facts” of the document itself,
because a charge dogged in: DOG-LATIN is grammatically saying nothing,
there is no charge so a “guilty plea” is an agreement to a document that
has no charge appearing. (Why? because its been poisoned by the poisonous
gloss that corrupts the essence of the text: DOG-LATIN) But what is the danger
for the Court: Such a court is tendering (Dealing with or passing off) a false
document and that in itself is criminal, that is uttering. (Attached) Blacks
Law Dictionary 4th Edition.
https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 6/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

This type of conduct is found more in relation to foreign private banks

acting as Governments and Police, when in fact, they are not. Such private
banks acting as Government are de-facto or counterfeit governments.

9  The only way the court can proceed to charge you with anything is that
you agree to the false impression of such a charge because the charge sheet
document grammatically becomes the fact that there is no charge. (Refer to
Deception: Attached: Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition)

10  The deception relates to someone attempting to deceive another

person in relation to a false presumption other than the fact. If the
grammatical facts state that a Charge sheet from the Court dogged in DOG-

https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 7/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

LATIN grammatically states nothing, but the Court attempts to portray a

false presumption in relation to such a document that states nothing, than
the deception is from whoever owns the Court. If you are aware of the
Grammatical facts relating to such a charge, or you are forced to deal with
such a document that you know that is grammatically stating that there is
no charge because it is Dogged (Corrupted), than the Court (STATE) is than
at fault and stands as the criminal for enforcing a false presumption.
(Uttering a forged document)
11  Re: The  GRAMMA FALSA NON VITATE CHARTAM, (Above) There is no
corruption of the document, it is simply stating that the document is what
it is, its grammatical meaning hides nothing, its Grammar is telling you
everything Re: The true grammatical fact!. (Its true grammatical standing
in fact) The document hides nothing but your own ignorance causes your
lack of ability to see the deception relating to the false impression you
have of such a document. The false world of corruption is the occult “flat
Earth” world of Babylon and if you become a “citizen” of such a world,
(Hold any account dogged in DOG-LATIN), such as a Driver License or a
Passport, or Bank Card, you have become a “citizen” of such a false quasi
dogged world and you become “subject” to the false presumptions
conferred to you by such a criminal occult corrupt world being: Babylon.
So Where Is The Deception?
12  So Where Is The Deception: Re: Deception (Attachment): The
“deception” is the “false impression” other than what such a document is
grammatically appearing as. The corruption and deception relates to the
“wrong impression” of the true correct grammatical facts. The document
is what it is but the one who deceives is the one who is attempting
to create a false impression to the grammatical true facts. Such a person is
the one taking the “risk” that the masses are unaware that “THIS TYPE
OF DOG LATIN FOREIGN TEXT” was nether LATIN or English.
DOG-LATIN has no jurisdiction with either Latin or English if appearing
on the same document with Latin text or English text, so what is it doing
on Court and Police and Banking Documents?. It is the jurisdiction of
BABYLON, the “debtor” of the VATICAN.
13  If this is organized, such as an entity that enforces the false impression
of a fact, being a fraud, than such an organization could be classed as a:
https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 8/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

Racketeering Organization, taking, lands, things, property and money-

wealth from people under a false presumption and backed up by threat,
intimidation, torture etc. Such crimes attract twenty year imprisonment to
life sentences in a common law standing. If the foreign state Police service
is a private organization registered to DUN & BRADSTREET, being a foreign
entity, that is hard to find and operating its courts and charges under a
DOG-LATIN deception in order to charge people for rights that already
exist, such as freedom to travel in an automobile on public lands, than are
all people involved with such an entity are criminal racketeer’s subject
to life in prison or even death.
Blacks Law Dictionary: 4th Edition:

https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 9/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

Is This For Limited Liability?

14  So what is Limited Liability? this is where the STATE has conferred the
presumptions (In a TRUST format) to the Office Holders of the State, such
as, the Police and the Judges. The Judge is paid a lot of money because it is
with his liability, relating to his legal training and grammatical ability to
deceive you, on behalf of the foreign private company he serves that
enables him to hold that office with success. (Nothing but a Pirate) The
liability is no longer with the STATE when the Judge has agreed to hold the
Office of Deception. The Judge should be skilled enough in order to identify
a man that knows the grammatical facts of a document in order that such a
judge  knows when to back away from attempting to confer a false charge
upon someone and if such a Judge pushes such a matter by force, or
threats or intimidation, it is with such a Judge that the liability will lie.
https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 10/11
5/7/2017 Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss. – justiniandeception

(The grammatical standing of the document he is trying to deceive you

with, will never change, it becomes the evidence of the deception) If the
one who is being charged sees the grammatical problem where the Police
Racketeering Organization have attempted to tender such a false
deceptive DOGGED instrument (DOG-LATIN), the Judge can burn the Police
or illegally and unlawfully burn the one who is aware of the Fraud-
Deception. If the JUDGE makes the mistake, liability will fall on him and
the STATE may be unharmed, limiting the liability from the foreign STATE
he serves, being the grantee and the administrator of such a deception. A
good judge will know when to back down if the grammatical facts
are endangering the false impression of a charge that does not
grammatically exist. If the Corporate Police (UNIDROIT-DOGS) confer a
charge to a man that was not the holder of the Babylonian dogged accounts
appearing in DOG-LATIN, (Such as a Driver License with your name
dogged into DOG-LATIN) the Judge has no option but to burn either
himself of the Police that mistakenly conferred such an account to the
“wrong man”. He will burn the ignorant officer that “applied” to act as the
UNIDROIT DOG within the Babylonian society of the dogs. (Babylonian
account holders)
As you can see, any document housing the DOG-LATIN all uppercase
hyphenated text is appearing with two distinct different languages,
rendering translation to be needed and as the Chicago Manual of Styles
confirms. Not only that but there is no jurisdiction between the two
languages appearing on such a document. If the written charge or the
name or any part of such a document appears in All Uppercase Text, that is
the “SIGN” that such all uppercase text is rendering something
“spurious”. The fact that Dog Latin is debased Latin renders such text as:
Criminal, Immoral, and as a counterfeit. (Enter at own risk)
If you are not aware of the “difference” between “THIS TEXT“, and
“THIS-TEXT” and “This text” than you are as good as legally dead! ….
“This is the director” and “THIS-IS-THE-ADMINISTRATOR” and “THIS
IS THE DEBTOR TRUSTEE” being the Ledger, (A ledger is the slab on a
tomb stone) and DOG-LATIN is the text on the tombs in the “Graveyard”
Summing Up:
15  The deception appears in order to plunder the sovereign STATE,
https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/ 11/11