Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
http://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/ijms
ABSTRACT
49
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
INTRODUCTION
Figure 1
When Covid-19 was detected in China in December 2019, the number of its international tourist arrivals
Based on also
dropped. This Figure
impacted1,the in 1990,
Malaysian theindustry.
tourism totalFortourist arrivals
the first half and tourism
of 2020, Malaysia registered
4.25 million tourist arrivals. This number was down to 68.2 percent for the same period in 2019. The
receipts recorded
implementation 7.4 million
of the movement tourists
control order (MCO) inand RM4.5
Malaysia billion,
on 18 March respectively.
2020 continued to hinder
The numbers declined slightly the following year because
the arrival of tourists to Malaysia. Malaysia could no longer receive international tourists ofborder
because all the
checkpoints to enter Malaysia were closed except for citizens who were returning to Malaysia.
Gulf War in 1991–1992 but picked up again in subsequent years. In
1996, the showed
This situation total that
recorded was
Covid-19 was 7.1related
closely million tourist
to tourist arrivals toarrivals
Malaysia and and RM10.4
to other tourism
destinations. The relationship between Covid-19 and economic activities such as tourism and its impact on
society is very significant (Bloom & Cadarette, 2019; Fauci & Morens, 2012; Gössling, 2002; Gössling 51 &
Hall, 2006: Gössling et al., 2020; Hall, 2019; Page & Yeoman, 2007; Scott & Gössling, 2015). This
relationship has also indicated significant job losses. According to Tan, M. L. (2020), Covid-19 has
threatened 75 million jobs in the global tourism industry and indirectly resulted in a global income reduction
of about RM9.18 trillion. According to the International Labour Organization (2020), 195 million workers
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
Table 1
LITERATURE REVIEW
The Covid-19 crisis that hit both internationally and nationally has
directly affected economic growth (Brodeur et al., 2020; Chetty et al.,
2020; Kraus et al., 2020; Surico & Galeotti, 2020). Many industries
are experiencing the impact of this pandemic, especially the tourism
industry (Baum & Hai, 2020; Chebli & Said, 2020; Couto et al., 2020;
Deb & Nafi, 2020; Gössling et al., 2020; Uğur & Akbıyık, 2020;
Yeh, 2020). Tourism activities that involve temporary movement to
destinations outside of residences cannot be conducted when travel
restrictions are implemented. Outdoor activities, especially activities
involving interaction with other people, have to be restricted for the
purpose of physical incarceration (Andersen, 2020). In addition, the
tourism industry is an industry that consists of several sectors. Thus,
production for each sector has also been affected. When production
activities are restricted due to travel restrictions and physical
distancing, changes in labour requirements in the market will occur.
Therefore, the projection of labour requirements, need to be conducted
to assist in reviving the country’s economy.
54
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
55
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
Projection using the Input-Output (IO) analysis is also one of the best
methods and is often used by researchers. Usually, IO analysis is used
to make plans and expectations for the future. This method involves
many sectors compared to the econometric method which only focuses
on one sector. This feature shows the relationship between activities
in the economy. Generally, IO analysis is used to study the effect of
changes in the final demands of an industry that causes an increase in
the activity in that industry and related industries. The impact of this
change is known as the multiplier effect (Archer, 1977). Many studies
have used IO analysis to investigate economic impact (Briassoulis,
1991; Chang et al., 2014; Chang et al., 2016; Fletcher, 1989; Kim &
Kim, 2015; Surugiu, 2009; Tohmo, 2005, 2018). However, studies
related to predicting manpower requirements using IO analysis
are relatively limited especially in Malaysia (Lelchumanan, 2019;
Lelchumanan et al., 2019; Poo et al., 2012; Sulaiman & Ismail, 2019;
Poo et al., 2011).
METHODOLOGY
The main source of data for this study was from the IO Table released
by the Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). The Input-
Output (IO) Table Malaysia 2015 was used in this study. The data
were aggregated into 17 sectors in which the tourism industry’s sub-
sector encompassed four main sectors; i.e. retail trade for tourism,
accommodation and food and beverages, transportation for tourism,
and entertainment and recreation. According to Saari and Rashid
(2006) the IO model is the closest to describing national accounts, as
it shows the flow of final goods and the balance of factors and non-
income factors of a sector. Therefore, projection using IO method is
a consistent prediction method and the closest to the actual value.
Following the said study, the IO method was used in this study.
X= AX+ F (1)
X: output vector
A: technical coefficient matrix
F: final demand vector
57
F: finalInternational
demandJournal
vectorof Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
F:F:final
finaldemand
demandvector
vector
or,
or,
or,
or,
IX-AX == F
IX-AX F (2) (2)
where
where II is identity
IX-AX==Fidentity
IX-AX is F matrix (n
matrix (n xx n)
n) (2)
(2
whereI Iisisidentity
where identitymatrix matrix(n(nxxn)n)
1 0 ⋯ ⋯ 0
01 10 ⋯ ⋯ 0
1 0 ⋯⋯ ⋯⋯ 00
I = 0⋮ 01 ⋯ 1 ⋯ 0
0 1 ⋯ ⋯⋯ 00
0
I I== ⋮ ⋮ 00 11 ⋯⋯ 00⋯ 0 1 0
[0 ⋯ ⋯ 0 1]
00 ⋯⋯ 00 11 00
[0[0 ⋯⋯ ⋯⋯ 00 11] ]
or,
or,
or, or, = F
[I-A]X (3)
[I-A]X = F (3)
[I-A]X==FF
[I-A]X (3)
(3
Equation (3) in the form of a matrix table is as follows:
Equation (3) in the form of a matrix table is as follows:
Equation
Equation(3) (3)ininthe theform
formofofaamatrix
matrixtable
tableisisasasfollows:
follows:
1
1 − 𝑎𝑎11− 𝑎𝑎 11 −𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎12 12 −𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎13 13 ⋯
⋯ −𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎1𝑛𝑛 𝑋𝑋11
1𝑛𝑛 𝑋𝑋 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹11
1−𝑎𝑎−𝑎𝑎
1−−21 21 1
𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎1111 1 −𝑎𝑎 −
−−𝑎𝑎 𝑎𝑎
𝑎𝑎1222
22
12
−𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎 23
23
1313 ⋯
⋯
⋯⋯ −𝑎𝑎 −𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎 2𝑛𝑛
2𝑛𝑛 𝑋𝑋 211 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹
1𝑛𝑛 𝑋𝑋2𝑋𝑋
1𝑛𝑛
𝑋𝑋 𝐹𝐹22𝐹𝐹
11
−𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎 1 −𝑎𝑎 𝑎𝑎
− 𝑎𝑎 1
1 −−
−𝑎𝑎 𝑎𝑎
𝑎𝑎 ⋯
⋯⋯ −𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎 𝑋𝑋
𝑋𝑋
𝑋𝑋 3 == 𝐹𝐹
𝐹𝐹
𝐹𝐹
−𝑎𝑎 31
31
21
32
1 −32𝑎𝑎2222 −𝑎𝑎23 33
33 ⋯ −𝑎𝑎 3𝑛𝑛
3𝑛𝑛
2𝑛𝑛 3𝑋𝑋
22 33
𝐹𝐹
2
−𝑎𝑎
21
⋮⋮ 3131 ⋮
𝑎𝑎⋮𝑎𝑎 1 −⋮ 𝑎𝑎
⋮
23
⋱⋱
⋯ ⋮
−𝑎𝑎⋮ 2𝑛𝑛
⋮ = 𝐹𝐹⋮⋮ 2
⋮
𝑋𝑋
−𝑎𝑎 32 1 − 𝑎𝑎
33 ⋯ −𝑎𝑎 3𝑛𝑛 𝑋𝑋
3 = 𝐹𝐹
3
[[ −𝑎𝑎 −𝑎𝑎⋮𝑛𝑛1 −𝑎𝑎⋮𝑛𝑛2 32
−𝑎𝑎⋮𝑛𝑛3 33 ⋯ ⋯⋱⋱ 11 −
3𝑛𝑛
− ⋮𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 ] [𝑋𝑋 ]3 [𝐹𝐹 ]3
⋮
𝑛𝑛1 −𝑎𝑎 ⋮
𝑛𝑛2 −𝑎𝑎 ⋮
𝑛𝑛3 ⋮𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 ] [𝑋𝑋𝑛𝑛⋮𝑛𝑛⋮] [𝐹𝐹𝑛𝑛⋮𝑛𝑛]⋮
[ [−𝑎𝑎 −𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛1 −𝑎𝑎−𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛2𝑛𝑛2 −𝑎𝑎
−𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛3𝑛𝑛3 ⋯⋯ 11−−𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 ] ][𝑋𝑋
𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 [𝑋𝑋𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛] ] [𝐹𝐹[𝑛𝑛𝐹𝐹𝑛𝑛] ]
from equation (3), Leontief
from equation (3), Leontief inverse matrix was obtained: inverse matrix was obtained:
𝑋𝑋
fromfrom= (𝐼𝐼 − 𝐴𝐴)−1(3),
equation
equation 𝐹𝐹(3),Leontief
Leontiefinverse
inversematrix
matrixwas wasobtained:
obtained: (4)
𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋==(𝐼𝐼(𝐼𝐼−−𝐴𝐴) −1
𝐴𝐴)−1𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹 (4) (4)
(4
where,
where,
X:
where,
where,output vector
X:
I: output
identity
X:X:output vector
matrix
outputvector vector
I:(I-A) identity-1
: matrix
Leontief inverse matrix
I:I:identity
identity matrix
matrix
(I-A)
Therefore,
-1
: Leontief inverse
the coefficient matrix
of labour in the economy is obtained by the following appr
(I-A)
(I-A)-1: :Leontief
-1
Leontief inverse
inversematrix
matrix
Therefore, the coefficient of labour in the economy is obtained by the
Therefore,
Therefore,
following the
thecoefficient
approach: coefficientofoflabourlabourininthe
theeconomy
economyisisobtained obtainedbybythe
thefollowing
followingappr
app
𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖 = 𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖 / 𝑋𝑋𝑖𝑖 (5)
where,
𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖== 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖 𝑖𝑖//𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑖𝑖 𝑖𝑖 (5) (5)
(5
Lwhere, :
where,
i Total labour in industry i
XLLii ::i :Total
where, Totalinput
Total labour
labour ininin
industry
industry
industry iii
LlXiiX :i :imatrix
Total
:Total
Total coefficient
labour
input
inputininindustry vectori ifor labour (i= 1, 2, 3……..n)
industry
Xliil::i :matrix
Total input
matrixcoefficient in industry
coefficientvector i for
vector forlabour
labour(i=(i=1,1,2,2,3……..n)3……..n)
lthen,
i
: matrix coefficient vector for labour (i= 1, 2, 3……..n)
𝑙𝑙then, = [ 𝑙𝑙1 𝑙𝑙2 ⋯ 𝑙𝑙𝑛𝑛 ]
𝑖𝑖then,
58
𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖==[ [𝑙𝑙1𝑙𝑙1 𝑙𝑙2𝑙𝑙2 ⋯⋯𝑙𝑙𝑛𝑛𝑙𝑙𝑛𝑛] ]
In the IO model, the formation of matrix vector for n labour coefficient, li indicates the
to produce one unit of output in industry, i. The coefficient of labour can be defined as
where,
Li : Total labour in industry i
Xi : Total input inJournal
International industry i
of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
li : matrix coefficient vector for labour (i= 1, 2, 3……..n)
then,
then,
𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑖 = [ 𝑙𝑙1 𝑙𝑙2 ⋯ 𝑙𝑙𝑛𝑛 ]
In the
In theIO
IOmodel,
model,thetheformation
formationofofmatrix
matrixvector
vectorfor
forn labour
n labour coefficient, li indicates
coefficient,
lto
i
produce one
indicates unit of
the total outputrequired
labour in industry, i. The coefficient
to produce one unit ofofoutput
labourincan be defined
required by
industry, onecoefficient
i. The unit of output. Labour
of labour cancoefficient
be definedisasanthe
implicit wayofof measuring
quantity
labour required by one unit of output. Labour coefficient is an implicit
way of measuring labour productivity. The number of workers for each
industry in the IO model has a relationship with the amount of output
that the industry produces. Therefore, to get the number of workers
number of workers for each industry in the IO model has a relationship with the am
working in industry i, labour coefficient, li should be multiplied by
industry produces. Therefore, to get the number of workers working in industry
the total output of Xi for that industry. By summing up the result of
should be multiplied
the multiplied labourby the total output
coefficient Xi for
and theoftotal that industry.
output By summing up the
of all industries
labour coefficientit and
in the economy, the totaltooutput
is possible obtainof
theallnumber
industries in the economy,
of workers for the it is possib
of workers for the total
total economy. Mathematically: economy. Mathematically:
number𝑛𝑛of workers for each industry in the IO model has a relationship with the am
𝐿𝐿
𝑇𝑇 = ∑𝑖𝑖 =produces.
industry 𝑙𝑙 li𝑋𝑋𝑖𝑖 (6)
Therefore, to get the number of workers working in industry(
where,
where,
should be multiplied by the total output of Xi for that industry. By summing up the
LL : total labour force in the economy.
T : total labour force in the economy.
labour coefficient and the total output of all industries in the economy, it is possib
of workers
Thus, for therequirement
the labour total economy. Mathematically:
equation of an Input-Output production
Thus, the labour requirement equation of an Input-Output production system of n s
system of n sector −1 is
𝐿𝐿
𝐿𝐿 𝑇𝑇==𝑙𝑙(𝐼𝐼
∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖=−𝑙𝑙 𝐴𝐴)
li𝑋𝑋𝑖𝑖 𝐹𝐹 (7) ((
L:
L:
where,employment
employment
l:l: the
the
LT : totaldiagonal
labourof
diagonal coefficient
offorce
coefficient matrix
matrix for
in the economy.for employment
employment
-1
(I-A) -1: Leontief inverse matrix
F:
Thus, finalthedemand
labour vector
requirement equation of an Input-Output production system of n s
𝐿𝐿 = 𝑙𝑙(𝐼𝐼 − 𝐴𝐴)−1 𝐹𝐹 (
The original
original model
modelused
usedininthis
thisresearch
research
is aismodel
a model introduced
introduced by
by Psacharopoulos
L: employment
Psacharopoulos (1973).
l: the diagonal of coefficient matrix for employment
(I-A)-1: Leontief inverse matrix
F: final demand vector DISCUSSION ON RESEARCH FINDINGS
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
The labour requirement was projected for three (3) years: 2017, 2019 and 2020. Th
The labour
originalrequirement
model usedwas in this research
projected foristhree
a model introduced
years: 2017, 2019by and
Psacharopoulos
once every five years or sometimes once every 10 years
2020. The IO Table is developed once every five years or sometimesby DOSM. However, the I
time to be released. Therefore, to forecast labour requirements
once every 10 years by DOSM. However, the IO schedule takes a long was rather difficult.
forecast labour
time to be requirements
released. Therefore, forto2020, whilst
forecast the forecast
labour of 2019
requirements wasand 2017 we
DISCUSSION ON RESEARCH FINDINGS
development trends
rather difficult. Thisofstudy
labour requirements.
attempted The labour
to forecast labourrequirements
requirementsprojections w
and 2020, and compared with 2015 (actual data from Input-Output Table 2015); as
The labour requirement was projected for three (3) years: 2017, 2019 59 and 2020. Th
once every five years or sometimes once every 10 years by DOSM. However, the I
Table
time to2be released. Therefore, to forecast labour requirements was rather difficult.
60
Table 2
Labour Requirements Projection for 2017, 2019 and 2020 as Compared to 2015
Employment (people)
Sector
2015 2017** 2019** 2020**
Agriculture 195241.330 228614.105 252230.426 265656.960
Mining 4201.585 4916.130 5424.023 5713.412
Manufacturing 60110.702 70330.377 77603.912 81744.313
Utility 4911.948 5758.503 6345.020 6683.606
Construction 15424.678 18137.424 20118.980 21246.148
Retail trade* 590398.697 696996.133 780277.604 826691.267
Retail, wholesale and motor vehicle 21319.481 24950.992 27496.058 28954.925
Accommodation and food & beverages* 882345.020 1032209.740 1136427.171 1195683.611
Restaurants 15983.459 18613.598 20281.812 21273.274
Transport for tourism* 239056.931 263724.992 282028.055 291765.664
Transport & communication 15146.642 17633.476 19292.140 20262.524
Finance & insurance 29529.832 34676.468 38349.429 40459.503
Real estate & ownership of dwellings 2028.641 2377.009 2623.806 2765.260
Government services 764.920 894.072 978.815 1029.006
Private services 144954.678 169345.009 184941.990 194296.818
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
for 2020, whilst the forecast of 2019 and 2017 were conducted to
see the development trends of labour requirements. The labour
requirements projections were made for 2017, 2019 and 2020, and
compared with 2015 (actual data from Input-Output Table 2015); as
shown in Table 2.
The Impact on Labour Requirements Due to Decrease in Chinese Tourists’ Expenditure in 2020
The other sector was government services, which was a sector with
a low labour requirement of 870.24 people following the decline in
Chinese tourists’ expenditure. Meanwhile, the private services sector
still required 161,994.23 people, which was a significant number
when compared with other sectors. The change in labour requirements
for this sector was also higher than other sectors at -16.63 percent.
The private services sector is an important sector in maintaining the
resilience of the tourism sector. The private services sector has been
liberalized by the government to attract more foreign investments
(Malaysian Investment Development Authority, n.d.). This sector
would in turn, receive the spill over effect of other sectors, especially
the tourism sector.
63
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
In addition, the labour force participation rate was also affected during
the MCO. As the tourism industry is a labour-intensive industry,
many sub-sectors have been severely affected. For example, the
tourism transport sub-sector, namely air transport, has been adversely
impacted by the Covid-19 crisis. National airlines operations had to
be limited and suspended especially overseas flights. Finally, airline
companies such as AirAsia and AirAsia X had to lay off 10 percent
of its total 24,000 workforce due to low employment requirements
(Bernama, 2020b).
The forecast for this study was conducted through the use of the IO
method. This method was chosen for its advantages. According to
Saari and Rashid (2006), the IO model can provide a picture closest
to the national accounts; i.e. by showing the flow of final products,
and the balance of factors and non-income factor(s) in a business
economy. Based on the IO method, the labour requirements would
64
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES
Ahmad, H., Poo, B. T., & Yussof, I. (2012). Keperluan tenaga manusia
sektor pembuatan di Malaysia. Prosiding PERKEM VII, Jld. 2,
1331–1348.
Alexander, C., Kamiar, M., Hashem, P, M., Mehdi, R., & Alessandro,
R. (2020, October 19). Economic consequences of Covid-19: A
counterfactual multi-country analysis. VOXEU CEPR. https://
voxeu.org/article/economic-consequences-covid-19-multi-
country-analysis
Andersen, M. (2020). Early Evidence on Social Distancing in
Response to COVID-19 in the United States. SRRN. http://
dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569368
Archer, B. (1977). Tourism multipliers: The state of the art, (vol. 11).
University of Wales Press.
Baum, T., & Hai, N. T. T. (2020). Hospitality, tourism, human
rights and the impact of COVID-19. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(7), 2397 – 2407.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2020-0242.
Bernama. (2020a). COVID-19: MIER tidak tolak kemungkinan
penurunan lagi OPR. https://bernama.com/bm/am/news_
koronavirus.php?id=1815540
Bernama. (2020b, October 9). AirAsia, AirAsia X tamatkan khidmat
lebih 2,000 pekerja. BH Online. https://www.bharian.com.my/
bisnes/korporat/2020/10/740263/airasia-airasia-x-tamatkan-
khidmat-lebih-2000-pekerja
Bloom, D. E., & Cadarette, D. (2019). Infectious disease threats in
the 21st century: Strengthening the global response. Frontiers
in Immunology, 10, 549.
Briassoulis, H. (1991). Methodological issues: Tourism input-output
analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 18(3), 485–495.
Brodeur, A., Gray, D. M., Islam, A., & Bhuiyan, S. (2020). A literature
review of the economics of COVID-19. IZA Discussion paper
no. 13411. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3636640
Butera, G. (2017). Lecture 4: Demystifying APA Citation [PowerPoint
slides]. George Washington University Introduction to Public
Health Services Blackboard: http://blackboard.gwu.edu
Campbell, C. P. (1997). Workforce requirement: The basis for relevant
occupational training. Journal of European Industrial Training,
21(8), 279–97.
66
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
Chang, Y. T., Park, H., Liu, S. M., & Roh, Y. (2016). Economic impact
of cruise industry using regional input–output analysis: A case
study of Incheon. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(1), 1–18.
Chang, Y. T., Shin, S. H., & Lee, P. T. W. (2014). Economic impact
of port sectors on South African economy: An input–output
analysis. Transport Policy, 35, 333–340.
Chebli, A., & Said, F. B. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on tourist
consumption behaviour: A perspective article. Journal of
Tourism Management Research, 7(2), 196–207.
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hendren, N., & Stepner, M. (2020). How
did Covid-19 and stabilization policies affect spending
and employment? A new real-time economic tracker based
on private sector data (No. w27431). National Bureau of
Economic Research.
Couto, G., Castanho, R. A., Pimentel, P., Carvalho, C., Sousa,
Á., & Santos, C. (2020). The impacts of COVID-19 crisis
over the tourism expectations of the Azores Archipelago
residents. Sustainability, 12(18), 7612.
COVID-19 situation update worldwide. (2020, December 5).
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-
2019-ncov-cases
Deb, S. K., & Nafi, S. M. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic
on tourism: Perceptions from Bangladesh. SRRN http://dx.doi.
org/10.2139/ssrn.3632798
Debeauvais, M., & Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). Forecasting the needs
for qualified manpower: Towards an evaluation. Forecasting
skilled-manpower needs: The experience of eleven countries.
UNESCO, 11–31.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2018). Anggaran penduduk
semasa, Malaysia, 2017–2018. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/
index.php?r=column/pdfPrev&id=T0lmSHlwOXJ1aWlzcjBla
m9ObUZpdz09
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2019). Anggaran penduduk
semasa, Malaysia, 2018–2019. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/
index.php?r=column/pdfPrev&id=Vjc3dFd5cXhNYTZtbnVh
S0lEWEpudz09
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020, July 13). Penunjuk
ekonomi Malaysia: Indeks pelopor, susulan bagi Mei 2020
[Press release]. https://web.facebook.com/StatsMalaysia/posts/
67
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
kenyataan-media-dosmpenunjuk-ekonomi-malaysia-indeks-
pelopor-serentak-susulan-me/3397617570259839/?_rdc=1&_
rdr
Fauci, A. S., & Morens, D. M. (2012). The perpetual challenge of
infectious diseases. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(5),
454–461.
Fletcher, J. E. (1989). Input-output analysis and tourism impact
studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 16(4), 514–529.
Gössling, S. (2002). Global environmental consequences of
tourism. Global Environmental Change, 12(4), 283–302.
Gössling, S., & Hall, M. C. (2006). Tourism and global environmental
change: Ecological, Economic, Social and Political
Interrelationships, 24–320.
Gössling, S., Scott, D., & Hall, C. M. (2020). Pandemics, tourism
and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. Journal
of Sustainable Tourism, 1–20.
Hall, C. M. (2019). Biological invasion, biosecurity, tourism, and
globalisation. In D. J. Timothy (Ed), Handbook of globalisation
and tourism (pp. 114-125) Edward Elgar Publishing. https://
doi.org/10.4337/9781786431295.00019
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan,
G., Xu, J., Gu, X., Cheng, Z., Yu, T., Xia, J., Wei, Y., Wu, W.,
Xie, X., Yin, W., Li, H., Liu, M... & Cao, B. (2020). Clinical
features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in
Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497–506.
International Labour Organization. (2020). ILO: COVID-19 causes
devastating losses in working hours and employment.
https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/
WCMS_740893/lang--en/index.htm
Ismail, R., Saukani, M. N. M., & Sulaiman, N. (2018). Long run labor
demand and manpower requirement in Malaysian construction
sector: A dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of Economic &
Management Perspectives, 12(2), 368–377.
Ismail, R., Sulaiman, N., Agus, A., & Ahmad, F. (2015). Labour
demand elasticity and manpower requirement in the Malaysian
service sector. International Review of Business Research
Papers, 11(2).
Ismail, R., Yussof, I., & Uddin, N. (2012). Analysis of labour
requirements in the Malaysian services sector. International
Journal of Business and Management Science, 5(1), 19.
68
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
70
International Journal of Management Studies, 28, No. 2 (July) 2021, pp: 49–72
72