You are on page 1of 4

Puncreos

Vol. IS, No. 3, pp. 222-225


0 1997 Lippincott-Raven Publkhers, Philadelphia

Pleural Effusion as a Predictor of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis

Stephen J. Heller, Elizabeth Noordhoek, Scott M. Tenner, Vino Ramagopal,


Matthew Abramowitz, Michael Hughes, and Peter A. Banks

Center for Pancreatic Disease, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Summary: Our objective was to determine whether pleural chest radiography, pleural effusion was seen in 16 of 19
effusion is a predictor of severity in acute pancreatitis and, if (84.2%) with severe pancreatitis and 10 of 116 (8.6%) of pa-
so, whether it is an independent predictor. One hundred ninety- tients with mild pancreatitis ( p < 0.001). Pleural effusion was
six consecutive cases of acute pancreatitis from October I , noted in severe pancreatitis prior to clinical or computed to-
1994, to September 30, 1995, were reviewed. Medical records mography evidence of severity in only 20% of cases. Pleural
were analyzed for evidence of pleural effusion by chest radio- effusion is strongly associated with severity in acute pancreati-
graph and severe acute pancreatitis by identification of pancre- tis but provides independent information on severity in only a
atic necrosis or organ system dysfunction. Data were analyzed minority of cases. Key Words: Acute pancreatitis-Pleural
to determine if identification of pleural effusion provided an effusion.
early sign of seventy. Among 135 patients who underwent

Pulmonary radiographic abnormalities are common in scan obtained within 72 h of admission and the extent of
acute pancreatitis. Abnormal chest radiographic findings pancreatic necrosis, inflammatory changes, and mortality
may be seen in up to 55% of patients (1). Major abnor- (8). Maringhini et al. noted a link between pleural effu-
malities include pulmonary infiltrates, pulmonary edema sion on ultrasound and severe disease as defined by the
related to adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Atlanta Symposium (organ system dysfunction or local
and pleural effusion. Minor findings include elevation of complications, i.e., necrosis, abscess, or pseudocyst) (9-
the left hemidiaphragm and basilar atelectasis (2,3). 11).
Pleural effusion occurs in 4-17% of patients with In this report, we have evaluated the association be-
acute pancreatitis (4). The effusions are exudates and tween pleural effusion on chest radiograph and severity
often hemorrhagic. Pleural effusions may or may not be of acute pancreatitis as defined by the Atlanta Sympo-
symptomatic and resolve as the pancreatitis subsides sium. In addition, we determined whether effusion is
(2,5). The presence of pleural effusion has been proposed documented early enough to be an independent predictor
as a marker for severe pancreatitis. Gumaste et al. noted of severity.
an association between pleural effusion on chest radio-
graph obtained within 6 days of admission and severe
METHODS
disease, as evidenced by Ranson’s criteria and pseudo-
cyst formation (6). Talamini et al. showed a correlation All patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to the
between pleural effusion on admission chest radiograph Brigham and Women’s Hospital between October 1,
and severe disease, as evidenced by pancreatic necrosis 1994, and September 30, 1995, were included. Two
and death (7). Lankisch et al. described an association methods were used to identify cases of acute pancreatitis.
between pleural effusion on computed tomography (CT) First, all patients given the discharge diagnosis of acute
pancreatitis were reviewed and included in the study if
Manuscript received November 6 , 1996; revised manuscript ac- there was an elevation of serum amylase or lipase to
cepted January 22. 1997. more than three times the upper limit of normal and if the
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. P. A. Banks,
Center for Pancreatic Disease, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 clinical presentation was consistent with acute pancreati-
Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A. tis. Second, a computer search was performed to identify

222
PLEURAL EFFUSION AS A PREDICTOR OF SEVERITY IN PANCREATITIS 223

all patients with an amylase or lipase elevated to more Table 1 classifies acute pancreatitis by severity and
than three times the upper limit of normal at least once etiology. Alcohol was the most common etiology
during their hospitalization. The medical record of each (28.6%), followed by idiopathic (20.4%), ERCP
patient was reviewed, and the patient was included if the (20.4%), and gallstones (18.4%). Severe acute pancreati-
clinical course was consistent with acute pancreatitis. tis comprised 10.2% of all cases, and mild pancreatitis
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography comprised 89.8%, Three patients died from severe acute
(ERCP) pancreatitis was defined as abdominal pain fol- pancreatitis: two of three had pleural effusion on chest
lowing ERCP requiring admission to the hospital for radiograph; the other patient underwent no radiography
intravenous narcotics, in conjunction with an elevation of after admission.
amylase or lipase to more than three times the upper limit Table 2 shows the relationship of pleural effusion to
of normal. Cases were excluded from the study if they etiology and severity in acute pancreatitis. Of 116 pa-
met one of the following criteria: pleural effusion on tients with mild pancreatitis who underwent chest radi-
chest radiograph preceding the development of acute ography, 10 had pleural effusion (8.6%). Of 19 patients
pancreatitis, a comorbid medical condition that could with severe pancreatitis who underwent chest radiogra-
lead to effusion (e.g., congestive heart failure), or acute phy, 16 had pleural effusion (84.2%). This difference is
pancreatitis in a moribund patient as a component of the statistically highly significant 0, < 0.001). As a test for
terminal illness. the presence of severe disease, pleural effusion had a
Cases that satisfied inclusion criteria were analyzed sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 91.4% (positive
according to demographic data of age, sex, and etiology predictive value, 61.5%; negative predictive value,
of acute pancreatitis. Etiology was identified from the 97.2%). However, there was no significant correlation
medical record using the diagnosis of the clinicians car- between the etiology of pancreatitis and the incidence of
ing for the patient. Records were reviewed to determine pleural effusion.
whether cases of pancreatitis represented the patient’s We wanted to establish that the difference in rates of
first, second, or more than second episode of acute pan- pleural effusion between mild and severe pancreatitis
creatitis. Cases were classified as mild or severe pancre- was not related to a difference in the number of previous
atitis. Pancreatitis was considered severe in the presence episodes of acute pancreatitis. To evaluate the number of
of one of the following: necrosis as demonstrated by previous episodes of acute pancreatitis as a possible con-
dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scan, surgical pathology, founder, we compared the rate of pleural effusion in mild
or autopsy or organ system dysfunction as reflected by and severe pancreatitis in the subset of patients suffering
hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or de- from their first or second bout of pancreatitis. Of the 62
pendence on intravenous pressors), hypoxemia (Pao, patients with mild pancreatitis and fewer than two prior
<60 mm Hg breathing room air), renal insufficiency (el- episodes, 5 (8.1%) had pleural effusion. Of the 16 pa-
evation of serum creatinine above 2 mg/dl in the absence tients with severe pancreatitis and fewer than two prior
of preexisting renal insufficiency), or significant gastro- episodes, 14 (87.5%) had pleural effusion. As these re-
intestinal bleeding (9,lO). sults are very similar to those obtained for all patients
Reports of chest radiographs performed at any time disregarding the number of prior episodes of pancreatitis,
during the hospitalization were reviewed for the presence we conclude that pleural effusion is linked with severity
of pleural effusions. In cases of acute pancreatitis trans- of disease rather than number of prior episodes.
ferred to our hospital, reports of chest radiographs per- Results of pleural effusion by anatomic location are
formed at the referring hospital were reviewed for the reported in Table 3. Effusions were bilateral in 18 of 26
presence of pleural effusion. Statistical analysis was per- (69.2%), left-sided in 7 of 26 (26.9%), and right-sided in
formed using Fisher’s exact test. I of 26 (3.9%). The distribution of effusions was similar
in mild and severe pancreatitis: bilateral effusions com-
RESULTS
TABLE 1. Acute pancreatitis (AP): etiology and severity
A total of 196 cases of acute pancreatitis in 162 pa-
Etiology n (%I Mild AP Severe AP
tients was included in the study. The mean age was 45. l
years (range, 19-89). Males were 40.7% of the study Alcohol 56 (28.6) 51 5
Idiopathic 40 (20.4) 37 3
population; females, 59.3%. Chest radiographs were per- ERCP 40 (20.4) 38 2
formed in 135 of 196 cases: 116 of 176 cases (65.9%) of Gallstones 36 (18.4) 29 7
mild acute pancreatitis and 19 of 20 cases (95.0%) of Miscellaneous 24 (1 2.2) 21 3
Total 196 176 (89.8) 20 (10.2)
severe disease.

Puncreas. Vul. 15, No. 3, 1997


224 S. J. HELLER ET AL.

TABLE 2. Pleural effusion (PE): relationship to etiology gan failure or pancreatic necrosis. Of the seven patients
and severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) in whom pIeural effusion preceded severity, in six we
PWtotal were able to calculate Apache I1 scores during the first 48
h of hospitalization to determine whether the presence of
Etiology Mild AP (%) Severe AP (%) Total (%)
effusion provided evidence of severity not already re-
Gallstone\ 2/20 (10) 5/7 (71) 7/27 (26) flected by an accepted standard. Only three of six had
Alcohol 2/37 ( 5 ) 41.5 (80) 6/42 (14)
ERCP 2/17 (12) 1/1 (100) 3/18 (17) scores <8 during the first 48 h of hospitalization. There-
Idiopathic 412 (14) 313 (100) 7/32 (22) fore, of the 14 patients with complete data including
Other 0/13 (0) 313 (100) 3/16 (19) Apache I1 scores, in only three (21.4%) did effusion
Total 10/1 16 (8.6) 16/19 (84.2) 261135 (19.3)
predict severity in the absence of other readily identifi-
able predictors of severity, namely, necrosis, organ dys-
prised 75% of all effusions in severe disease and 60% of function, or an elevated Apache 11 score. Since the pa-
all effusions in mild disease. tient with pleural effusion on admission also had el-
To determine whether the presence of pleural effusion evated Apache I1 scores in the initial 24 h, in only three
provided an early, independent predictor of severity in of 15 (20%) was pleural effusion an independent predic-
acute pancreatitis, we determined whether the pleural tor of severity.
effusion was present at admission. Eighteen patients with
severe pancreatitis underwent chest radiography on ad- DISCUSSION
mission; only one had a pleural effusion. To ensure that
the effusions detected after admission were detected in a Previous reports have noted a correlation between
timely fashion, we determined the time interval between pleural effusion and severity in acute pancreatitis, as evi-
the previous chest radiograph showing no effusion and denced by pseudocysts (6,8), necrosis (7,8), and mortal-
the chest radiograph that identified the effusion. Of the ity (7,8). A recent study linked pleural effusion detected
15 patients who were noted to have pleural effusion after by ultrasonography with severe pancreatitis in accor-
admission, 9 (60.0%) had a negative chest radiograph 1 dance with criteria outlined by the Atlanta Symposium
day before the effusion was documented, and 13 (86.7%) (9). However, none of these studies evaluated pleural
had a negative chest radiograph 2 days prior to docu- effusion detected by chest radiography as a predictor of
mentation of the effusion. We therefore conclude that severity using the Atlanta criteria.
pleural effusion is rarely present at admission; the later The data from this report are the first to demonstrate a
detection of pleural effusions was due to a delay in onset correlation between pleural effusion on chest radiograph
rather than a delay in detection. and severity in accordance with the Atlanta criteria. The
We then evaluated whether pleural effusion was iden- findings of this study confirm the link between pleural
tified before or after recognition of severe disease by effusion and severity of acute pancreatitis. Pleural effu-
standard criteria: necrosis, organ failure, or Apache I1 sion on chest radiograph had a sensitivity of 84.2% and
score >8. In the 15 cases of severe pancreatitis and pleu- a specificity of 91.4% for severe disease, as manifested
ral effusion documented after admission, the median day by pancreatic necrosis or organ failure.
of documentation of effusion was hospital day 3.5 However, this report also shows that pleural effusion
(range, 2-9). We compared the day of documentation of is rarely an early, independent predictor of severity. Only
pleural effusion with the day of documentation of sever- 1 of 18 patients with severe pancreatitis who underwent
ity by the Atlanta criteria (organ failure or CT scan dem- admission chest radiography had a pleural effusion on
onstrating necrosis). Of the 15 patients, in 7 (46.7%) admission. Of the 15 patients with severe pancreatitis
documentation of effusion preceded identification of or- who developed pleural effusion after admission, 13 had a
negative chest radiograph within 2 days of the documen-
TABLE 3. Pleural effusions: relationship of severity to tation of effusion. This finding demonstrates that the
anatomic location identification of pleural effusion after admission reflects
Mild AP Severe AP the actual clinical course rather than delayed detection of
(n = 116) (n = 19) Total (%) an existing effusion. Pleural effusion demonstrated se-
Left-sided 3 4 7 (26.9) verity earlier than standard criteria in only 20% of cases.
Right-sided I 0 1 (3.8) Because the most severe bouts of acute pancreatitis
Bilateral 6 12 18 (69.2) generally occur during the patient’s first or second epi-
Totdl 10 16 26
sode (12), we wanted to establish that the difference in
AP, acute pancreatitis. rates of pleural effusion between mild and severe pan-

Puncreus. Vol. 15, No. 3. 1997


PLEURAL EFFUSION AS A PREDICTOR OF SEVERITY IN PANCREATITIS 225

creatitis was not due solely to a difference in the number To summarize, pleural effusion is associated with se-
of prior episodes. To clarify this issue, we evaluated the verity in acute pancreatitis but predicts severity indepen-
subset of patients with fewer than two prior episodes of dently in only 20% of cases. Admission chest radio-
acute pancreatitis. We found that within this subset, 8. I % graphs are rarely helpful. However, if a patient is noted
of patients with mild pancreatitis and 87.5% of patients to have pleural effusion without other manifestations of
with severe pancreatitis had pleural effusion. The differ- severity, the clinician should remain vigilant for the de-
ence in rates of pleural effusion persisted after control- velopment of severe disease.
ling for number of prior episodes. From these data, we
conclude that the incidence of pleural effusion correlates
with the severity of pancreatitis, not the number of prior REFERENCES
episodes.
1. Kaye MD. Pleuropulmonary complications of pancreatitis. Thorux
We wanted to determine whether pleural effusion was 1968;23:297-306.
associated with the etiology of acute pancreatitis. Our 2. Shapiro MS, Dobbins JW, Matthay RA. Pulmonary manifestations
study found no relationship between the etiology of acute of gastrointestinal disease. Clin Chest Med 1989;10:61743.
pancreatitis and the development of pleural effusion. 3. Lankisch PG, Droge M, Becher R. Pulmonary infiltrations: sign of
severe acute pancreatitis. Znt J Puncreatol 1996;19:113-5.
This finding corroborates those of Lankisch et al. (8) and 4. McKenna JM, Chandrasekhar AJ, Skorton D, Craig RM, Cugell
Maringhini et al. (9) but contradicts the findings of Gu- DW. The pleuropulmonary complications of pancreatitis. Chest
maste et al. (6), who found a higher incidence of pleural 1977;71:197-204.
effusions in alcoholic than gallstone pancreatitis. From 5. Basran GS, Ramasubramanian R, Verma R. lntrathoracic compli-
cations of acute pancreatitis. Br J Dis Chest 1987;81:326-31.
our findings we conclude that effusion is related to se- 6. Gumaste V, Singh V, Dave P. Significance of pleural effusion in
verity but not etiology. patients with acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:
We investigated whether there was a link between the 871-4.
severity of pancreatitis and the anatomic location of 7. Talamini G, Bassi C, Falconi M, et al. Risk of death from acute
pancreatitis: role of early, simple “routine” data. Int J Pancreatol
pleural effusions. This report found no relationship be- 1996;19:15-24.
tween severity of acute pancreatitis and anatomic distri- 8 . Lankisch PG, Droge M, Becher R. Pleural effusions: a new nega-
bution of pleural effusions. In both mild and severe dis- tive prognostic parameter for acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroen-
terol 1994;89:1849-51.
ease, the majority of effusions was bilateral. Thus it ap-
9. Maringhini A, Ciambra M, Patti R, et al. Ascites, pleural, and
pears that the site of pleural effusion offers no additional pericardial effusions in acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:
prognostic information. Our results corroborate those of 848-52.
Lankisch et al. ( 8 ) , who reported that 7 7 % of pleural 10. Bradley EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pan-
effusions were bilateral. In contrast, in the series by Gu- creatitis. Arch Surg 1993;128:586-90.
I 1 , Banks PA. A new classification system for acute pancreatitis. Am
maste et al. (6) and Maringhini et al. (9), left-sided ef- J Gustroenterol 1994;89:151-2.
fusions were most frequent (55 and 60%, respectively). 12. Ranson JHC. Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute
The significance of this discrepancy is unclear. pancreatitis: a review. Am J Casrruenterol 1982;77:633-8.

Pancreas, Vol. IS, N o . 3, 1997

You might also like