You are on page 1of 9

EDITOR’S CHOICE

Risk of Infection in Thumb


Carpometacarpal Surgery After
Corticosteroid Injection
Mia M. Qin, MD,* Charles D. Qin, MD,† Daniel J. Johnson, MD,* David M. Kalainov, MD, MBA*

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients who had an intra-
articular corticosteroid injection into the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint for the treat-
ment of arthritis within the 3 months before CMC joint arthroplasty or arthrodesis were at
increased risk for wound complication/infection and/or repeat surgery for wound complica-
tion/infection in comparison with patients who did not receive an injection within 6 months or
who received an injection between 3 and 6 months before surgery.
Methods We identified 5,046 patients in the Humana claims database who underwent surgery
for CMC joint arthritis. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) no thumb injection within
6 months of CMC joint surgery, (2) thumb injection between 3 and 6 months before CMC joint
surgery, and (3) thumb injection within 3 months before CMC joint surgery. The primary
outcome was wound complication/infection within 90 days after surgery. The secondary outcome
was repeat surgery for wound complication/infection within 90 days after surgery. Multivariable
logistic regression was performed to assess the associations between the timing of injection
and wound complication/infection and repeat surgery for wound complication/infection.
Results The rates of wound complication/infection within 90 days after surgery were similar
among the 3 study groups. However, patients who received an intra-articular corticosteroid
injection within 3 months before surgery had a 2.2 times greater likelihood of repeat surgery
for a wound complication/infection compared with patients who did not have an injection
within 6 months before surgery.
Conclusions Patients who receive an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within the 3 months
before surgery for CMC joint arthritis may be at increased risk of repeat surgery to treat
a wound complication/infection in the 90-day postoperative period. (J Hand Surg Am.
2021;46(9):765e771. Copyright Ó 2021 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All
rights reserved.)
Type of study/level of evidence Prognostic II.
Key words Corticosteroid injection, infection, thumb carpometacarpal arthritis, thumb carpo-
metacarpal surgery.

From the *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwestern University; and the †Department Corresponding author: Mia M. Qin, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwestern
of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. University, 259 E. Erie St. 13th floor, Chicago, IL 60611E; e-mail: mia.helfrich@northwestern.
edu.
Received for publication April 16, 2020; accepted in revised form April 7, 2021.
0363-5023/21/4609-0005$36.00/0
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.04.010
to the subject of this article.

Ó 2021 ASSH r Published by Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. r 765


766 INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION

T
HE EFFICACY OF REPEATED intra-articular in- From the group of qualifying ICD-9 codes, pa-
jections for the treatment of painful thumb tients who underwent surgery for CMC joint arthritis
carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is were identified by filtering for the Current Procedural
controversial.1e3 There is concern about septic Terminology (CPT) codes 25447 (arthroplasty,
arthritis following an intra-articular injection due to interposition, intercarpal, or CMC joints), 25210
direct bacterial inoculation of the joint from a needle (carpectomy, 1 bone), and 26841 (arthrodesis, CMC
and concern about the possible immunosuppressive joint, thumb, with or without internal fixation). The
effect of corticosteroids.4,5 Giladi et al6 reported a search was further refined to include only patients
20% increased risk of complications after CMC with information in the database encompassing a
arthroplasty surgery, most notably infectious com- minimum of 6 months before and 18 months after
plications, in association with preoperative intra- surgery. The 6-month preoperative time frame was
articular CMC joint corticosteroid injections. chosen to capture a reasonable course of nonoperative
Recent studies in hip and knee arthroplasty have management for CMC joint arthritis. The 18-month
found a time-dependence of injection with an time frame after surgery was chosen to ensure
increased risk of periprosthetic infection when a adequate follow-up data.
corticosteroid was injected into the joint within 3 From the final surgical sample of 5,046 patients,
months before surgery, but not when a corticosteroid an intra-articular corticosteroid injection before sur-
was injected into the joint more than 3 months before gery was identified by filtering for CPT code 20600
surgery.5,7 An increased risk for postoperative (injection small joint fingers) in association with the
infection has also been found in association with National Drug Codes for triamcinolone, betametha-
localized corticosteroid injections administered sone, and methylprednisolone solutions. The CPT
within 3 months before trigger release surgery.8 We code modifiers identified in the database as FA (left
aimed to better define the relationship between the thumb) and F5 (right thumb) were queried to ensure
timing of an intra-articular corticosteroid injection that the injection site was the same side as the sur-
and postoperative wound complications, including gical site. The CPT codes pertaining to other sites of
infection, in thumb CMC joint arthritis surgery. injection, such as in the wrist, hand, and elsewhere in
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the body, were excluded.
patients who had an intra-articular corticosteroid in- The operative patients were stratified into 3
jection for the treatment of arthritis of the thumb CMC groups: (1) no thumb injection within 6 months
joint within 3 months before CMC joint arthroplasty or before CMC joint surgery (3,047 patients), (2) thumb
arthrodesis were at increased risk for wound compli- injection between 3 and 6 months before CMC joint
cation/infection and/or repeat surgery for wound surgery (1,313 patients), and (3) thumb injection
complication/infection, in comparison to patients who within 3 months before CMC joint surgery (686 pa-
did not receive an injection within 6 months before or tients). The time frame we chose to analyze cortico-
between 3 and 6 months before surgery. steroid joint injections (ie, administered within or
more than 3 months before surgery) was based on
previous studies.8,10e12 Patient demographics and
MATERIALS AND METHODS medical histories were tabulated in each case,
Using the PearlDiver analytic database (PearlDiver including age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, and co-
Technologies), a search of Humana claims data was morbidity status, using the Charlson comorbidity in-
completed to identify all patients 18 years or older dex (Table 1). The Charlson comorbidity index ranks
with an International Classification of Diseases, 12 comorbidities with various weights to reach a
Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis of osteoarthrosis of maximum score of 24, and it can be used to estimate
the hand (ICD-9 codes 715.14, 715.24, and 715.94) the risk of readmission after hand surgery.13
between January 1, 2007, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome was wound complication/
The Humana administrative claims data included infection within 90 days after surgery. The secondary
medical, prescription, and laboratory data from 20.9 outcome was repeat surgery for wound complication/
million privately insured and Medicare Advantage infection within 90 days after surgery. Wound
patients. A benefit of the PearlDiver Humana claims complication/infection was defined by a range of
database over other large-volume national databases ICD-9 codes covering wound dehiscence and post-
was the ability to identify the laterality of procedures, operative infection (Table E1, available online on
which was especially pertinent to CMC joint arthritis the Journal’s website at www.jhandsurg.org). A
because this condition often manifests bilaterally.9 repeat surgical procedure was defined by an ICD-9

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021


INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION 767

TABLE 1. Patient Demographics


No Injection Injection Between Injection Within
Within 6 Months 3 and 6 Months 3 Months P
Patient Characteristics of Surgery (3,047) Before Surgery (1,313) Prior to Surgery (686) Value

Age (y) <.05


35e39 11 (0.36%) <10 (<1%) <10 (<1%)
40e44 24 (0.79%) <10 (<1%) <10 (<1%)
45e49 66 (2.17%) 26 (1.98%) 15 (2.19%)
50e 54 162 (5.32%) 72 (5.48%) 51 (7.43%)
55e59 283 (9.29%) 142 (10.81%) 65 (9.48%)
60e64 362 (11.88%) 174 (13.25%) 107 (15.60%)
65e69 866 (28.42%) 356 (27.11%) 195 (28.43%)
70e74 768 (25.21%) 368 (28.03%) 144 (21.0%)
75e79 408 (13.39%) 150 (11.42%) 77 (11.22%)
80e84 135 (4.43%) 56 (4.27%) 25 (3.64%)
85e89 23 (0.75%) <10 (<1%) <10 (<1%)
>90 15 (0.49%) <10 (<1%) <10 (<1%)
Female 2,228 (73.12%) 988 (75.25%) 527 (76.82%) .08
Diabetes 1,042 (34.2%) 455 (34.65%) 247 (36.0%) .66
Smoker 1,193 (39.15%) 518 (39.45%) 296 (43.15%) .15
Charlson comorbidity index* 1.7 (2.1) 1.8 (2.1) 1.7 (2.1) >.99
Carpectomy, 1 bone 295 (9.68%) 59 (4.49%) 31 (4.52%) <.05
Arthroplasty, interposition, 2,682 (88.02%) 1,228 (93.53%) 634 (92.42%)
intercarpal, or CMC joint
Arthrodesis, CMC joint, 70 (2.30%) 26 (1.98%) 21 (3.06%)
thumb, with or without
internal fixation

*Mean (SD).

code(s) covering wound complication/infection and a (CPT code 25447) were also completed. The CPT
CPT code encompassing incision and drainage, code 25447, which included all interposition pro-
debridement, and/or arthrotomy with the National cedures whether with tendon, allograft, or artificial
Correct Coding Initiative 78 modifier (Table E2, material, was the most common procedure queried,
available online on the Journal’s website at and it was analyzed as a separate group because of its
www.jhandsurg.org). The 90-day cutoff after surgery adequate sample size. Statistical significance was
was based on the senior author’s experience in determined for a P value of <.05. A post hoc power
diagnosing and managing such complications, and it analysis was performed. With a beta of 0.8 and the
was a time period 1 month longer than that used in a given sample size, the study was powered to detect a
related report.6 1.42% difference in wound complication/infection
The c2 test was used for the bivariate analysis of rates between different groups.
categorical variables, and analysis of variance was
used for the analysis of continuous variables. Logistic
regression testing was performed to assess for re- RESULTS
lationships between the timing of injection and The rates of wound complication/infection within 90
postoperative wound complication/infection and/or days after surgery were similar among the 3 study
repeat surgery for wound complication/infection, af- groups: no intra-articular corticosteroid injection
ter adjusting for age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, and within 6 months before surgery (3.0%), intra-articular
comorbidity burden. The c2 and logistic regression corticosteroid injection between 3 and 6 months
subanalyses of interposition arthroplasty cases alone before surgery (2.8%), and intra-articular

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021


768 INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION

TABLE 2. Bivariate Analysis


No Injection Within Injection Between Injection Within
6 Months of 3 and 6 Months 3 Months Prior to
Outcome Surgery (3,047) Before Surgery (1,313) Surgery (686) P Value

Wound complication/infection 90 (3.0%) 37 (2.8%) 29 (4.2%) .35


Repeat surgery 32 (1.1%) 12 (0.9%) 15 (2.2%) <.05

corticosteroid injection within 3 months before sur- complication/infection within 90 days after surgery in
gery (4.2%, P ¼ .35) (Table 2). In contrast, the comparison to patients who did not receive an in-
incidence of repeat surgery within 90 days after jection within 6 months before surgery (odds ratio
surgery for wound complication/infection was 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.5e5.3, P < .05)
significantly greater in the patient group treated with (Table 5).
an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3
months before surgery compared with the other 2
groups (2.2% vs 1.1% and 0.9%, P < .05) (Table 2). DISCUSSION
In the subanalysis of interposition arthroplasty In a large United States health insurance administra-
cases, the incidences of wound complication/infec- tive database, the incidences of wound complication/
tion within 90 days after surgery were similar among infection within 90 days after surgery for CMC joint
the 3 study groups: no intra-articular corticosteroid arthritis were similar between patients who did and
injection within 6 months before surgery (3.0%), did not receive a preoperative CMC joint corticoste-
intra-articular corticosteroid injection between 3 and roid injection, regardless of whether the injection was
6 months before surgery (2.7%), and intra-articular administered before or within a 3-month period ahead
corticosteroid injection within 3 months before sur- of surgery. We suspect that our findings differ from
gery (4.3%) (P ¼ .45). In contrast, the rate of repeat the conclusions drawn in large joint arthroplasty
surgery within 90 days after surgery for wound studies because of the absence of prosthetic implan-
complication/infection was significantly greater in the tation in the majority of CMC arthritis surgeries.
patient group treated with an intra-articular cortico- In contrast, patients who received an intra-articular
steroid injection within 3 months before surgery in corticosteroid injection within 3 months before sur-
comparison to the other 2 groups (2.4% vs 0.9% and gery were at an increased risk of repeat surgery
0.8%, P < .05) (Table 3). within 90 days postoperatively to treat a wound
On regression analysis, neither the group of pa- complication/infection. This may be a spurious as-
tients who had an intra-articular corticosteroid injec- sociation or related to wound breakdown and/or
tion within 3 months before CMC joint surgery nor infection. There are recognized adverse effects of
the group of patients who had an injection more than steroid injections on collagen production and degra-
3 months before surgery was found to have an dation.14 The exact mechanisms by which a cortico-
increased likelihood of postoperative wound steroid joint injection may increase the risk of
complication/infection within 90 days after surgery infection and the time frame for developing an
(P > .17). However, patients who received an intra- infection are not clear. Direct inoculation and/or
articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months immunosuppression caused by the steroid product are
before surgery had an increased likelihood of repeat conceivable risk factors.15 Injectable steroids alter the
surgery within 90 days for wound complication/ action of cytokines involved in inflammation and
infection in comparison to patients who did not have block the production of prostaglandins and leukotri-
an injection within 6 months before surgery (odds enes, which are primary inflammatory
ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0e4.1, P < .05) mediators.15e17
(Table 4). The incidences of a wound complication/infection
The same relationship was found on regression (2.8%e4.2%) and the rates of returning to surgery for
analysis of the interposition arthroplasty cases alone. the treatment of a wound complication/infection
Patients who received an intra-articular corticosteroid (0.9%e2.2%) in our study groups were greater than 2
injection within 3 months before surgery had an previous CMC joint arthroplasty reports. Menendez
increased likelihood of repeat surgery for wound et al18 found a 0.49% infection rate, and Shah et al19

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021


INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION 769

TABLE 3. Subanalysis Bivariate Analysis


No Injection Within Injection Between Injection Within
6 Months of 3 and 6 Months 3 Months Prior
Outcome Surgery (2,683) Before Surgery (1,231) to Surgery (634) P Value

Wound complication/infection 80 (3.0%) 33 (2.7%) 27 (4.3%) .45


Repeat surgery 24 (0.9%) 10 (0.8%) 15 (2.4%) <.05

TABLE 4. Logistic Regression Analysis


Injection Between Injection Within
3 and 6 Months Before 3 Months Prior
Outcome Surgery OR (95% CI) P Value to Surgery OR (95% CI) P Value

Wound complication/infection* 0.7 (0.5e1.1) .19 1.3 (0.9e1.9) .17


Repeat surgery* 0.9 (0.4e1.7) .66 2.2 (1.0e4.1) <.05

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.


*Reference group is no injection.

TABLE 5. Subanalysis Logistic Regression Analysis


Injection Between Injection Within
3 and 6 Months Before 3 Months Prior
Outcome Surgery OR (95% CI) P Value to Surgery OR (95% CI) P Value

Wound complication/infection* 0.8 (0.5e1.2) .32 1.5 (0.8e2.2) .12


Repeat surgery* 0.9 (0.4e1.8) .79 2.8 (1.5e5.3) <.05

*Reference group is no injection.

found a 0.66% wound complication rate and a 0.15% infection, after trigger release surgery when a corti-
return-to-surgery incidence after CMC joint arthro- costeroid injection was administered within 3 months
plasty. Conversely, Giladi et al6 found a 5% infection (ie, between 31 and 90 days) prior to surgery, but not
complication rate after CMC joint arthroplasty or when an injection was administered more than
fusion in an administrative database study of 16,268 90 days before surgery. The patients in our study
surgical cases. The odds of any complication, most who were categorized as not having received a CMC
notably infectious, were increased by 20% by 1 joint injection within 6 months before surgery could
preoperative corticosteroid injection. Our methodol- still have received an injection(s) before that time
ogy, which included more than 2 dozen ICD-9 codes interval (ie, before the start of data collection).20
to identify complications after CMC joint surgery, However, without an increase in risk of a wound
was most similar to that of Giladi et al6 and different complication/infection or additional surgery to treat
from that of Menendez et al18 and Shah et al,19 which a wound complication/infection, we can infer
we believe played a role in the differences in reported that a CMC joint corticosteroid injection(s) admin-
infection rates. istered more than 6 months before surgery had no
A higher risk of postoperative infection in patients adverse effect on wound healing or surgical site
who had an intra-articular corticosteroid injection infection.
within 3 months before surgery has been reported The CPT code 25447 (arthroplasty, interposition,
after trigger release surgery. Matzon et al8 found an intercarpal or carpometacarpal) was the most com-
increased risk of deep infection requiring surgical mon billing code for treatment of CMC arthritis. This
irrigation and debridement, but not superficial procedural code included all interposition procedures,

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021


770 INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION

whether with tendon, allograft, or artificial material. include wide confidence intervals, making it difficult
While the implication for infection risk of other to determine the true relative risk of steroid injection
procedures (such as implant arthroplasty) may be of on repeat surgery.
greater interest, we did not complete subanalyses of Surgeon variations in operative and injection
other CPT codes due to inadequate sample sizes. Like techniques and differences in administrative CPT
our entire study sample, the patients designated by coding may have also affected our results. We did not
CPT code 25447 who received a corticosteroid in- assess for potential differences between the 3 corti-
jection within 3 months before CMC arthroplasty costeroid solutions (triamcinolone, betamethasone,
surgery had an increased likelihood of returning to and methylprednisolone) regarding any association
surgery for treatment of a wound complication/ with postoperative wound complication/infection or
infection. repeat surgery for a wound complication/infection. In
There are several limitations of our study. With a addition, the CPT codes pertaining to other sites of
beta of 0.8 and the given sample size, the study is injection in the wrist and hand were excluded.
powered to detect a 1.42% difference in wound Consequently, we did not assess the potential adverse
complication/infection rates between groups. To our effects of nearby steroid injections on the risk of a
knowledge, the percentage difference that denotes a postoperative CMC joint wound complication/infec-
clinically meaningful difference has not been defined. tion. Finally, an evaluation of repeat surgery for the
The Humana claims database does not provide treatment of the first metacarpal instability and/or
detailed information on suture anchors, plates, hardware failure is not included in our study design;
screws, wires, or allografts. These implants may the management of such complications has been
conceivably influence the risk of a thumb CMC joint previously reported.22
wound complication/infection. We did not assess the Patients who receive an intra-articular corticoste-
number of preoperative corticosteroid injections into roid injection within 3 months before surgery for
the basal joint of the thumb because these data were CMC joint arthritis of the thumb may be at increased
not available. Giladi et al6 found that each cortico- risk in the first 90 days postoperatively for additional
steroid injection after the first injection increased the surgery to treat a wound complication/infection.
odds of a complication after thumb CMC arthritis Although further studies are needed to draw definitive
surgery by 10%. In hip and knee arthroplasty, reports conclusions, intra-articular injections may be a
vary based on whether the absolute number of pre- modifiable risk factor for infection in the 3 months
operative corticosteroid injections influences the risk before surgery to treat thumb CMC joint arthritis.
of postoperative infection.5,21
The imprecision of ICD-9 coding may have also
REFERENCES
have had an impact on our study findings. The ICD-9
classification system that was in use in the United 1. Joshi R. Intraarticular corticosteroid injection for first carpometa-
carpal osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(7):1305e1306.
States through September 2015 did not specify be- 2. Spaans AJ, van Minnen LP, Kon M, Schuurman AH, Schreuders AR,
tween thumb and finger CMC joints or the severity of Vermeulen GM. Conservative treatment of thumb base osteoarthritis:
CMC arthritis when coding for osteoarthritis in the a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(1):16e21.
3. Trellu S, Dadoun S, Berenbaum F, Fautrel B, Gossec L. Intra-artic-
hand. Consequently, some operations in our analyses ular injections in thumb osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-
may have involved the finger rather than the thumb analysis of randomized controlled trials. Joint Bone Spine.
CMC joints. The ICD-9 coding system also did not 2015;82(5):315e319.
classify the severity of a wound complication or 4. Moran SL, Duymaz A, Karabekmez FE. The efficacy of hyaluronic
acid in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint.
distinguish between superficial and deep infections. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(5):942e944.
Intuitively, a return to the operating room for treat- 5. Richardson SS, Schairer WW, Sculco TP, Sculco PK. Comparison of
ment of a postoperative wound complication/infec- infection risk with corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injection prior to
total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(2):112e118.
tion (designated by a CPT code encompassing 6. Giladi AM, Rahgozar P, Zhong L, Chung KC. Corticosteroid or
incision and drainage, debridement, and/or arthrot- hyaluronic acid injections to the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb
omy) would reflect a serious wound complication/ joint are associated with early complications after subsequent sur-
gery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(10):1106e1110.
deep infection rather than a minor wound complica- 7. Bedard NA, Pugely AJ, Elkins JM, et al. The John N. Insall Award:
tion/superficial infection.8 However, an individual do intraarticular injections increase the risk of infection after TKA?
surgeon’s rationale for returning a patient to the Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(1):45e52.
operating room cannot be discerned from the claims 8. Matzon JL, Lebowitz C, Graham JG, Lucenti L, Lutsky KF,
Beredjiklian PK. Risk of infection in trigger finger release surgery
database and may have influenced our findings. following corticosteroid injection. J Hand Surg Am. 2020;45(4):
Moreover, the relative risk estimates in our analyses 310e316.

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021


INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION 771

9. Marshall M, van der Windt D, Nicholls E, Myers H, Dziedzic K. 16. D’Acquisto F, Paschalidis N, Raza K, Buckley CD, Flower RJ,
Radiographic thumb osteoarthritis: frequency, patterns and associa- Perretti M. Glucocorticoid treatment inhibits annexin-1 expression in
tions with pain and clinical assessment findings in a community- rheumatoid arthritis CD4þ T cells. Rheumatology. 2008;47(5):
dwelling population. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(4):735e739. 636e639.
10. Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Mayman DJ, Lyman S, Jerabek SA. 17. Barnes PJ. Anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids: molecular
Preoperative hip injections increase the rate of periprosthetic infec- mechanisms. Clin Sci. 1998;94(6):557e572.
tion after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(9):166e169. 18. Menendez ME, Lu N, Unizony S, Choi HK, Ring D. Surgical site
11. Cancienne JM, Werner BC, Luetkemeyer LM, Browne JA. Does infection in hand surgery. Int Orthop. 2015;39(11):2191e2198.
timing of previous intra-articular steroid injection affect the post- 19. Shah KN, Defroda SF, Wang B, Weiss AC. Risk factors for 30-day
operative rate of infection in total knee arthroplasty? complications after thumb CMC joint arthroplasty: an American
J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(11):1879e1882. College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program
12. Werner BC, Cancienne JM, Browne JA. The timing of total hip Study. Hand. 2019;14(3):357e363.
arthroplasty after intraarticular hip injection affects postoperative 20. Gershkovich GE, Boyadjian H, Conti Mica M. The effect of image-
infection risk. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(4):820e823. guided corticosteroid injections on thumb carpometacarpal arthritis.
13. Voskuijl T, Hageman M, Ring D. Higher Charlson comorbidity in- Hand. 2021;16(1):86e92.
dex scores are associated with readmission after orthopaedic surgery. 21. Chambers AW, Lacy KW, Liow MHL, Manalo JPM, Freiberg AA,
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1638e1644. Kwon YM. Multiple hip intra-articular steroid injections increase risk
14. Wei AS, Callaci JJ, Juknelis D, et al. The effect of corticosteroid on of periprosthetic joint infection compared with single injections.
collagen expression in injured rotator cuff tendon. J Bone Joint Surg J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(6):1980e1983.
Am. 2006;88(6):1331e1338. 22. Mattila S, Waris E. Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty:
15. Dahl J, Hammert WC. Overview of injectable corticosteroids. J Hand risk factors, procedures and outcomes. Acta Orthop. 2019;90(4):
Surg Am. 2012;37(8):1715e1717. 389e393.

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021


771.e1 INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION

TABLE E1. ICD-9 Codes to Identify Postoperative Wound Complication/Infection


ICD-9 Codes Descriptors

Wound complication 998.3 Codes all related to disruption of operative wound


998.3
998.31
998.32
998.83 Non-healing surgical wound
882.0 Open wound of hand (except fingers alone)
882.1 Open wound of hand (except fingers alone), complicated
882.2 Open wound of hand (except fingers alone), with tendon involvement
Infection 998.59 Post-operative wound infection
682.4 Cellulitis and abscess of hand (except fingers and thumb)
682.8 Cellulitis and abscess of other site
682.9 Cellulitis and abscess of unspecified site
681.0 Cellulitis and abscess of finger
681.00 Cellulitis and abscess of finger, unspecified
681.9 Cellulitis and abscess of unspecified digit
686.8 Other specified local infections of skin and subcutaneous tissue
686.9 Unspecified local infection of skin and subcutaneous tissue
998.5 Post-operative infection, not elsewhere classified
998.59 Other post-operative infection
996.60 Infection and inflammatory reaction due to unspecified device, implant, and graft
996.69 Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal prosthetic device, implant,
and graft
996.79 Other complications due to other internal prosthetic device, implant, and graft
996.67 Infection and inflammatory reaction due to other internal orthopedic device,
implant, and graft

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021


INFECTION IN CMC SURGERY AFTER INJECTION 771.e2

TABLE E2. CPT Codes for Repeat Surgery Due to Wound Complication/Infection
CPT codes Descriptors

11040 Debridement of skin, partial thickness


11041 Debridement of skin, full thickness
11042 Debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue
11043 Debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and muscle
11044 Debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and bone
10140 Incision and drainage of hematoma, seroma, or fluid collection
10180 Incision and drainage, complex, postoperative wound infection
20000 Drainage of abscess or fluid collection
20005 Incision of soft tissue abscess, deep or complicated
25028 Incision and drainage, forearm and/or wrist, deep abscess or hematoma
25035 Incision, deep, with opening of bone cortex forearm and/or wrist
25040 Arthrotomy, radiocarpal or mediocarpal joint, with exploration, drainage, or removal of foreign body
26034 Incision, deep, with opening of bone cortex, hand or finger
26070 Arthrotomy, for infection, with exploration, drainage, or removal of foreign body, carpometacarpal joint
10060 Incision and drainage of abscess, simple or single
10061 Incision and drainage of abscess, complex or multiple
10120 Incision and removal of foreign body, subcutaneous tissue, simple
10121 Incision and removal of foreign body, subcutaneous tissue, complicated
12020 Treatment of superficial wound dehiscence, simple closure
12021 Treatment of superficial wound dehiscence, with packing
16020 Dressings and/or debridement, without anesthesia, small
16025 Dressings and/or debridement, without anesthesia, medium
16030 Dressings and/or debridement, without anesthesia, large

J Hand Surg Am. r Vol. 46, September 2021

You might also like