Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Asam Urat Metabolic Risk Factor HF
Asam Urat Metabolic Risk Factor HF
Abstract: The prevalence of hyperuricemia is low in Uygurs, who have a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors
such as hypertension, overweight–obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance (IR). This study sought to
investigate the relationships between serum uric acid (UA) and these risk factors in this population. A cross-sectional study
was conducted in Uygurs (859 males, 1268 females) aged 20 to 70 years. Demographic data, systolic blood pressure
(SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI), and fasting and postprandial blood were obtained, and bio-
logical measurements were determined. The mean of BMI, SBP, DBP, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein choles-
terol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, and
homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), and the prevalence of hypertension, IR, hyperglyce-
mia, overweight–obesity, hypercholesteremia, hyper-LDL-c, and hypertriglyceridemia increased with UA but the preva-
lence of hypo-HDL-c decreased (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratios for IR, overweight–
obesity, hypercholesteremia, hyper-LDL-c, and hypertriglyceridemia against the lowest UA group increased but decreased
for hypo-HDL-c (p < 0.05). The UA in the hypo-HDL-c group was lower than that of the controls; the prevalence of
hypo-HDL-c in hyperuricemia subjects was lower than in those with normal UA (p < 0.05). But the opposite results were
observed between overweight–obesity, hyperglycemia, IR, hypercholesteremia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyper-LDL-c and
correspondence controls, respectively (p < 0.05). In Uygur, elevated UA is associated with overweight–obesity, hypercho-
For personal use only.
lesteremia, hyper-LDL-c, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, and IR. The HDL-c level significantly increases with UA,
whereas the prevalence of hypo-HDL-c decreases. Further studies are needed to clarify why UA is positively correlated to
HDL-c.
Key words: serum uric acid, overweight–obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, hypertension.
Résumé : Chez les Uygurs, la prévalence d’hyperuricémie est faible tandis que la prévalence des facteurs de risque [hy-
pertension, surpoids/obésité, dyslipémie, hyperglycémie, insulinorésistance (IR)] est élevée. Cette étude se propose d’ana-
lyser chez les Uygurs la relation entre le taux sérique d’acide urique (UA) et les facteurs de risque. L’étude, de nature
transversale, porte sur 1268 femmes et 859 hommes âgés de 20 à 70 ans. On enregistre les données démographiques et on
évalue les pressions systolique (SBP) et diastolique (DBP), l’indice de masse corporelle (BMI); de plus, on prélève des
échantillons de sang en condition de jeûne et dans un état postprandial afin d’analyser la concentration des mesures biolo-
giques choisies. Les moyennes respectives de BMI, des SBP et DBP, du cholestérol total, des lipoprotéines à haute densité
(HDL-c), des lipoprotéines à faible densité (LDL-c), des triglycérides, du glucose sanguin à jeun, de l’insuline à jeun, du
HOMA-IR et la prévalence de l’hypertension, de l’IR, de l’hyperglycémie, du surpoids–obésité, de l’hypercholestérolémie,
de l’hyper-LDL-c et de l’hypertriglycéridémie augmentent avec la concentration d’UA, mais la prévalence de l’hypo-
HDL-c diminue (p < 0,05). D’après l’analyse de régression logistique, les rapports des cotes de l’IR, du surpoids–obésité,
de l’hypercholestérolémie, de l’hyper-LDL-c et de l’hypertriglycéridémie augmentent relativement au groupe présentant la
plus faible concentration d’UA, mais diminuent en présence d’hypo-HDL-c (p < 0,05). Le taux d’UA dans le groupe pré-
sentant une hypo-HDL-c est plus faible que dans le groupe de contrôle; la prévalence de l’hypo-HDL-c chez les sujets hy-
peruricémiques est plus faible que chez les individus présentant un taux normal d’UA (p < 0,05). Néanmoins, on observe
le contraire en ce qui concerne le surpoids–obésité, l’hyperglycémie, l’IR, l’hypercholestérolémie, l’hypertriglycéridémie
en présence d’hyper-LDL-c comparativement aux valeurs du groupe de contrôle (p < 0,05). Chez les Uygurs, un taux élevé
d’UA est associé au surpoids–obésité, à l’hypercholestérolémie, à l’hyper-LDL-c, à l’hypertriglycéridémie, à l’hypergly-
cémie et à l’IR. Le taux d’HDL-c augmente significativement avec le taux d’UA et la prévalence de l’hypo-HDL-c dimi-
nue. Il faut faire d’autres études pour établir pourquoi le taux d’UA est positivement associé au taux d’HDL-c.
Received 16 February 2009. Accepted 5 August 2009. Published on the NRC Research Press Web site at apnm.nrc.ca on 13 November
2009.
N.F. Li,1 H.M. Wang, J. Yang, L. Zhou, X.G. Yao, and J. Hong. The Center of Hypertension of the People’s Hospital of Xinjiang
Uygur Autonomous Region; The Center of Diagnosis, Treatment and Research of Hypertension in Xinjiang, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830001,
China.
1Corresponding author (e-mail: lnanfang@yahoo.com.cn).
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 34: 1032–1039 (2009) doi:10.1139/H09-101 Published by NRC Research Press
Li et al. 1033
______________________________________________________________________________________
Introduction domly selected by multistage cluster sampling from the He-
tian area in the south of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous
Effective prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) re-
Region of China. Subjects with secondary hypertension,
quires early detection and correction of predisposing condi-
acute stroke, gout, or cancer, or those taking diuretics, were
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by TEXAS STATE UNIV on 08/09/13
Table 1. The baseline characteristics compared by different sex and UA-based groups.
Male Female
Normouricemia, Hyperuricemia, Normouricemia, Hyperuricemia,
Characteristics n = 817 n = 42 p value n = 1247 n = 21 p value
Age (y) 56.79±13.9 50.95±12.6 0.008* 50.64±12.6 52.33±12.1 0.539
BMI (kgm–2) 26.43±4.4 29.89±4.7 <0.001* 26.66±4.7 29.14±4.8 0.019*
SBP (mm Hg) 132.10±28.9 134.90±31.1 0.543 131.47±27.7 146.05±29.1 0.017*
DBP (mm Hg) 78.64±19.1 80.93±16.2 0.447 78.97±15.6 89.48±22.1 0.002*
BUN (mmolL–1)
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by TEXAS STATE UNIV on 08/09/13
nine; TC, serum total cholesterol; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride;
FBG, fasting blood glucose; 2HPG, 2-h postprandial glucose; FINS, fasting insulin; 3HPINS, 3-h postprandial insulin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis
model assessment insulin resistance index.
*Significant difference, p < 0.05.
graphic information; detailed history; family history of hy- Serum was separated immediately and stored at –80 8C. All
pertension, overweight–obesity, DM, and stroke; drug treat- blood samples were examined within a month in the Clinical
ment; education; alcohol consumption; and cigarette Center of the People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autono-
smoking. Cigarette smoking was defined as having smoked mous Region.
at least 1 cigarette per day for 1 or more years during the
participant’s lifetime. Alcohol use was assessed using an in- Biological measurements
terviewer-administered questionnaire with 6 questions re- Serum lipids (including TC, TG, HDL-c, and LDL-c), se-
garding the frequency, amount, and type of alcoholic drinks rum UA, FBG, 2HPG, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creati-
consumed. Participants were initially asked whether or not nine (Cr), and other biological measurements were obtained
they consumed alcohol. Participants who drank alcohol by enzymatic methods with an autoanalyzer (7600–010 Au-
were then asked to specify the number of years during tomatic Analyzer; HITACHI Medical System, Suzhou,
which they drank alcohol and the amounts of alcohol con- China). Fasting insulin (FINS) and 3-h postprandial insulin
sumption per month for each of 4 types of alcohol (beer, (3HPINS) were determined by radioimmunity methods.
liquor, wine (other than rice wine), and rice wine) over the Quality controls were conducted by special docimaster.
previous year. This quantity was then multiplied by the per-
centage of alcohol in each type of drink: for beer, 3.9%; for Statistical analysis
wine, 11.6%; for rice wine, 13.6%; and for liquor, 53.3%. Data analyses were performed using the SPSS statistics
Grams of alcohol per month were then summed across the package, version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.). The catego-
4 types of beverages and divided by 12.5 g to provide the rical variables were tested by c2 test. Quantitive variables
number of standardized alcoholic drinks consumed per were shown as mean ± standard deviation and the differen-
month. Alcohol consumption was defined as drinking at ces among groups were evaluated by Student’s t test. FINS,
least 12 drinks containing alcohol during the last year. Fol- 3HPINS, and HOMA-IR were transformed into normal dis-
lowing a common protocol recommended by the American tribution by function of base-e logarithm of nume 100.
Heart Association anthropometric measurements, the blood (We multiplied FINS, 3HPINS, and HOMA-IR by 100 in or-
pressure (BP) measurement was performed by trained and der to avoid a negative number after transform.) After ad-
certified observers 3 times per subject and the mean value justment for age, sex, education, smoking, and drinking,
was considered the final BP value. Other data, such as logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the
height, mass, and waistline and hip circumferences, were ob- UA-based risk for hypertension, overweight–obesity, dyslipi-
tained by standard protocols, and BMI was calculated. The demia, hyperglycemia, and IR, respectively. The adjusted
overnight fasting (12 h at least) venous blood was drawn factors also included lipid profiles, BMI, BUN, Cr, FBG,
from all participants and 1761 participants received OGTT. 2HPBG, FINS, and 3HPINS for hypertension; lipid profiles,
Li et al.
Table 2. The odds ratios (ORs) of each cardiovascular risk factor according to UA-based categories.
Factors UA1 (UA £ 177 mmolL–1) UA2 (177 < UA £ 219 mmolL–1) UA3 (219 < UA £ 271 mmolL–1) UA4 (UA > 271 mmolL–1) p value
Hypertension
OR 1 1.263 0.942 0.992 0.297
95% CI 0.905–1.764 0.659–1.347 0.647–1.520
Logistic regression model Logit (hypertension) = –6.763 + 0.046 (age) + 0.105 (BMI) + 0.213 (TG) + 0.212 (smoking) + 0.143 (drinking)
Overweight–obesity
OR 1 1.561 1.41 3.015 <0.001*
95% CI 1.114–2.187 0.999–1.991 1.996–4.555
Logistic regression model Logit (overweight–obesity) = –2.061 + 0.022 (age) – 0.728 (HDL-c) + 0.217 (LDL-c) + 0.481 (TG) + 1.104 (UA)
Hypercholesteremia
OR 1 1.973 2.715 5.14 <0.001*
95% CI 0.856–4.549 1.209–6.099 2.259–11.693
Logistic regression model Logit (hypercholesteremia) = –9.385 + 1.254 (female) + 0.233 (FBG) + 0.042 (Cr) + 1.637 (UA)
Hypo-HDL-c
OR 1 0.636 0.435 0.364 <0.001*
95% CI 0.458–0.881 0.305–0.619 0.238–0.555
Logistic regression model Logit (hypo-HDL-c) = 4.956 – 1.404 (female) – 0.239 (FBG) + 0.038 (BMI) – 1.011 (UA)
Hyper-LDL-c
OR 1 1.263 1.609 2.769 0.012*
95% CI 0.618–2.583 0.812–3.188 1.371–5.589
Logistic regression model Logit (hyper-LDL-c) = –5.184 + 0.018 (Cr) + 0.237 (FBG) + 1.018 (UA)
Hypertriglyceridemia
OR 1 2.387 3.528 6.236 <0.001*
95% CI 1.352–4.212 2.034–6.120 3.585–10.849
Logistic regression model Logit (hypertriglyceridemia) = –6.812 – 0.119 (BUN) + 0.161 (FBG) + 0.125 (BMI) + 1.830 (UA)
IR
OR 1 1.615 1.961 2.23 <0.001*
95% CI 1.233–2.116 1.474–2.608 1.604–3.100
Logistic regression model Logit (IR) = –5.680 + 0.453 (female) + 0.091 (BUN) + 0.169 (TC) + 0.093 (BMI) + 0.460 (TG) + 0.802 (UA)
Hyperglycemia
OR 1 0.853 0.913 1.199 0.196
95% CI 0.626–1.163 0.658–1.268 0.809–1.778
Logistic regression model Logit (hyperglycemia) = –6.044 + 0.524 (female) + 0.021 (age) + 0.015 (Cr) + 0.042 (BMI) + 0.445 (TC) + 0.043 (drinking)
Note: Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine ORs of each cardiovascular risk factor. The differences of ORs among various UA groups were compared with the lowest UA group. UA,
serum uric acid; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; Cr,
creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; IR, insulin resistance; TC, serum total cholesterol.
*The significant differences of ORs among UA1, UA2, UA3, and UA4 groups, p < 0.05.
Table 3. Comparison of serum uric acid (UA) levels between population. The baseline characteristics of the study popula-
normal and disease groups by covariate variance analysis ad- tion are presented in Table 1, which shows that in the hyper-
justing for confounding factors. uricemia group, the mean values of BMI, BUN, Cr, TC,
HDL-c LDL-c, TG, FBG, LnFINS, LnHOMA-IR, and risk
Factors UA (mmolL–1) f value p value
index significantly increased in males and BMI, SBP, DBP,
Hypertension BUN, Cr, TC, HDL-c LDL-c, FBG, LnHOMA-IR, and risk
Yes (n = 804) 239.11±79.112 0.184 0.668 index significantly increased in females. Compared with the
No (n = 1323) 223.64±73.574 hyperuricemia group, the subjects in the normouricemia
Overweight–obesity group were more highly educated and less likely to smoke
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by TEXAS STATE UNIV on 08/09/13
Normal UA Hyperuricemia
Factors group group c2 p value
Hypertension
Yes (n = 804) 774 30 2.662 0.103
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by TEXAS STATE UNIV on 08/09/13
No (n = 1323) 1290 33
Overweight–obesity
Yes (n = 1315) 1261 54 15.700 <0.001
No (n = 812) 803 9
Hypercholesteremia
Yes (n = 163) 140 23 76.336 <0.001
No (n = 1964) 1924 40
Hypo-HDL-c
Yes (n = 1083) 1062 21 8.032 0.005
No (n = 1044) 1002 42
Hyper-LDL-c
Yes (n = 177) 159 18 34.895 <0.001
No (n = 1950) 1905 45
Hypertriglyceridemia
Yes (n = 324) 298 26 34.086 <0.001
No (n = 1803) 1766 37
For personal use only.
IR
Yes (n = 1027) 980 47 18.010 <0.001
No (n = 1100) 1084 16
Hyperglycemia
Yes (n = 825) 776 49 34.114 <0.001
No (n = 936) 927 9
Note: A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. UA, serum uric acid;
HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cho-
lesterol.
excretion of UA into the urine caused by the effect of in- which are sweetened by sugar or fructose. Fructose, rather
sulin on the urinary tubular tract has been demonstrated than starch, is the only sugar that can raise serum UA con-
with physiological hyperinsulinemia acutely reducing uri- centrations, and this has been shown in both humans (Stirpe
nary UA (Facchini et al. 1991; Quiñones Galvan et al. et al. 1970) and rodents (Stavric et al. 1976). Their diet may
1995; Ter Maaten et al. 1997); accelerated UA production be the reason for the lower prevalence of hyperuricemia in
coupled with the synthesis of TG (Fabregat et al. 1987); Uygurs. Although the prevalence of hyperuricemia is very
increased insulin secretion and resistance were observed in low (3.1%), we found higher levels of serum UA to be asso-
obesity (Pi-Sunyer 2002); and UA is a surrogate of IR ciated with an increased risk of overweight–obesity,
(Chen et al. 2008). However, Lohsoonthorn et al. (2006) hypercholesteremia, hyper-LDL-c, hypertriglyceridemia,
noted that obesity and central body fat distribution, rather hyperglycemia, and IR in the present Uygur population.
than hyperinsulinemia–IR, play a major role in linking hy- Moreover, the risk index of the cluster of hypertension,
peruricemia with cardiovascular risk factor clustering in overweight–obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and IR in-
MS. Some groups have found that the contribution of UA creased with serum UA in this population, which indicates
as an additional component of MS seems to be insignifi- that the possibility of these risk factors occurring together
cant (Liou et al. 2006). Therefore, the above-mentioned increases with the serum UA levels. Previous studies have
hypothesis remains uncertain but merits further study. confirmed that higher morbidity and mortality from CVD
Uygurs, with a total population of 8.8 million (45% of the are observed when these risk factors occur together. All
total population of Xinjiang, national census 2003), are the these data suggest a potential causative role for UA in the
largest nationality in Xinjiang. The present Uygur popula- development of cardiovascular risk. This hypothesis merits
tion dwells in South Xinjiang, which is farthest from the investigation, perhaps including intervention studies to re-
oceans in China. Therefore, they have little access to sea- duce UA. Moreover, even at the low levels commonly en-
food. Uygurs have excessive starch intake because the popu- countered in the Uygur population, serum UA appears to be
lar and main food for them is ‘‘nang’’, which is made of associated with established cardiovascular risk factors. Pro-
flour. They seldom have Western food and soft drinks, spective studies to evaluate the impact of serum UA on
CVD risk in this ethnic group provide an opportunity to fur- M. Kuerban for his continuous support of our population
ther evaluate a causative role for serum UA in its pathogen- survey in the Hetian area. In addition, we thank all the staff
esis. The ideal reference threshold of serum UA for efficient of the Center of Diagnosis, Treatment and Research of Hy-
prevention of CVD in the Uygur general population is un- pertension in Xinjiang for their support with the medical ex-
clear. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed to amination and demographic data collection. This study was
clarify this point. supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
The relationship between hyperuricemia and hypertension China (30260038) and the National Supporting Programs
has been well reported in different ethnic groups, and hyper- for Critical Illness of China (2002BA711A0B).
uricemia has been proposed as the key linking factor for hy-
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by TEXAS STATE UNIV on 08/09/13
inconsistent with previous studies (Hikita et al. 2007; Lin et Cooper, R.S., Orduñez, P., Iraola Ferrer, M.D., Munoz, J.L., and
al. 2007). Also, Yan et al. (2005) discovered that the serum Espinosa-Brito, A. 2006. Cardiovascular disease and associated
HDL-c levels in a rural Uygur population in China increased risk factors in Cuba: prospects for prevention and control. Am.
with age, BMI, BP, and fasting glucose levels. The underly- J. Public Health, 96(1): 94–101. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.
ing causes for these novel phenomena remain unclear. In ad- 051417. PMID:16317211.
dition to the influence of ethnic-specific environmental and Dehghan, A., van Hoek, M., Sijbrands, E.J., Hofman, A., and
behavioral factors, genetic factors might play a role. There- Witteman, J.C. 2008. High serum uric acid as a novel risk factor
for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 31(2): 361–362. doi:10.2337/
fore, further study is needed to elucidate both the environ-
dc07-1276. PMID:17977935.
mental and genetic determinants of the novel HDL-c
Fabregat, I., Revilla, E., and Machado, A. 1987. Short-term control
distribution and their association with CVD in the Uygur
of the pentose phosphate cycle by insulin could be modulated by
population. Furthermore, the role of an elevated HDL-c NADPH/NADP ratio in rat adipocytes and hepatocytes. Bio-
level with regard to CVD risk in Uygurs is unclear and de- chem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 146(2): 920–925. doi:10.1016/
serves further study as well. 0006-291X(87)90618-8. PMID:3304289.
The present study has several limitations. Because we Facchini, F., Chen, Y.D.I., Hollenbeck, C.B., and Reaven, G.M.
used cross-sectional data to predict the influences of serum 1991. Relationship between resistance to insulin-mediated glu-
UA on the prevalence and severity of overweight–obesity, cose uptake, urinary uric acid clearance, and plasma uric acid
dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and IR, a causal relationship concentration. JAMA, 266(21): 3008–3011. doi:10.1001/jama.
cannot be determined. In addition, our study subjects are 266.21.3008. PMID:1820474.
only from the Uygur population; though the homogenous Feig, D.I., Nakagawa, T., Karumanchi, S.A., Oliver, W.J., Kang,
nature of the cohort eliminates confounding factors such as D.H., Finch, J., and Johnson, R.J. 2004. Hypothesis: Uric acid,
race and socioeconomic status, our results may not necessa- nephron number, and the pathogenesis of essential hypertension.
rily be generalizable to other populations. Kidney Int. 66(1): 281–287. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.
In summary, the prevalence of overweight–obesity, hyper- 00729.x. PMID:15200435.
cholesteremia, hyper-LDL-c, hypertriglyceridemia, hyper- Ford, E.S., Li, C., Cook, S., and Choi, H.K. 2007. Serum concentra-
glycemia, and IR increases with serum UA, although the tions of uric acid and the metabolic syndrome among US chil-
prevalence of hyperuricemia is lower in Uygurs. A notice- dren and adolescents. Circulation, 115(19): 2526–2532. doi:10.
able result of the present study is that the HDL-c signifi- 1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.657627. PMID:17470699.
cantly increases but the prevalence of hypo-HDL-c Forman, J.P., Choi, H., and Curhan, G.C. 2007. Plasma uric acid
decreases with UA. Further research should explore the eth- level and risk for incident hypertension among men. J. Am.
Soc. Nephrol. 18(1): 287–292. doi:10.1681/ASN.2006080865.
nic-specific genetic and environmental factors underlying
PMID:17167112.
the lower prevalence of hyperuricemia and the positive asso-
Guo, Y.Y., Wang, K., Zhao, L., and He, B.X. 2006. Epidemiology
ciation between serum UA and HDL-c in Uygurs.
study on metabolic syndrome in Xinjiang. Chin. J. Intern.. Med.
45: 227–228. [In Chinese.]
Acknowledgements Hikita, M., Ohno, I., Mori, Y., Ichida, K., Yokose, T., and Hosoya,
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to T. 2007. Relationship between hyperuricemia and body fat dis-
tribution. Intern. Med. 46(17): 1353–1358. doi:10.2169/ Shao, J.H., Mo, B.Q., Yu, R.B., Li, Z., Liu, H., and Xu, Y.C. 2003.
internalmedicine.46.0045. PMID:17827832. Epidemiological study on hyperuricemia and gout in community
Krishnan, E., Kwoh, C.K., Schumacher, H.R., and Kuller, L. 2007. of Nanjing. Chin J Dis Control Prev. 7: 305–308.
Hyperuricemia and incidence of hypertension among men with- Shao, J.H., Shen, X., Li, D.Y., Shen, H.B., Xu, Y.C., and Mo, B.Q.
out metabolic syndrome. Hypertension, 49(2): 298–303. doi:10. 2007. Study on the relationship between compositions of hyper-
1161/01.HYP.0000254480.64564.b6. PMID:17190877. uricemia and metabolic syndrome. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing
Li, Y., Stamler, J., Xiao, Z.H., Folsom, A., Tao, S.C., and Zhang, Xue Za Zhi, 28(2): 180–183. [In Chinese.] PMID:17649693.
H.Y.; The PRC-USA Collaborative Study in Cardiovascular and Siu, Y.P., Leung, K.T., Tong, M.K., and Kwan, T.H. 2006. Use of
Cardiopulmonary Epidemiology. 1997. Serum uric acid and its allopurinol in slowing the progression of renal disease through
correlates in Chinese adult populations, urban and rural, of its ability to lower serum uric acid level. Am. J. Kidney Dis.
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by TEXAS STATE UNIV on 08/09/13
Beijing. Int. J. Epidemiol. 26(2): 288–296. doi:10.1093/ije/26.2. 47(1): 51–59. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.10.006. PMID:16377385.
288. PMID:9169163. Stavric, B., Johnson, W.J., Clayman, S., Gadd, R.E., and Chartrand,
Lin, J.D., Chiou, W.K., Chang, H.Y., Liu, F.H., and Weng, H.F. A. 1976. Effect of fructose administration on serum urate levels
2007. Serum uric acid and leptin levels in metabolic syndrome: in the uricase inhibited rat. Experientia, 32(3): 373–374. doi:10.
a quandary over the role of uric acid. Metabolism, 56(6): 751– 1007/BF01940847. PMID:1253916.
756. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2007.01.006. PMID:17512306. Stirpe, F., Della Corte, E., Bonetti, E., Abbondanza, A., Abbati, A.,
Liou, T.L., Lin, M.W., Hsiao, L.C., Tsai, T.T., Chan, W.L., Ho, and De Stefano, F. 1970. Fructose-induced hyperuricaemia. Lan-
L.T., and Hwu, C.-M. 2006. Is hyperuricemia another facet of cet, 2(7686): 1310–1311. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(70)92269-5.
the metabolic syndrome? J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 69(3): 104–109. PMID:4098798.
doi:10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70186-8. PMID:16599014. Strasak, A.M., Kelleher, C.C., Brant, L.J., Rapp, K., Ruttmann, E.,
Lohsoonthorn, V., Dhanamun, B., and Williams, M.A. 2006. Preva- Concin, H., et al. 2008. Serum uric acid is an independent pre-
lence of hyperuricemia and its relationship with metabolic syn- dictor for all major forms of cardiovascular death in 28,613 el-
drome in Thai adults receiving annual health exams. Arch. derly women: a prospective 21-year follow-up study. Int. J.
Med. Res. 37(7): 883–889. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.03.008. Cardiol. 125(2): 232–239. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.11.094.
PMID:16971230. PMID:18237790.
Mellen, P.B., Bleyer, A.J., Erlinger, T.P., Evans, G.W., Nieto, F.J., Sun, Y.P., Yao, H., Amulajiang, M., and Cai, Z.H. 2007. The ana-
Wagenknecht, L.E., et al. 2006. Serum uric acid predicts inci- lysis of uric acid level and the prevalence of hyperuricmia in
dent hypertension in a biethnic cohort: the atherosclerosis risk Uygur ethnic population. J. Xinjiang Medical University, 5:
For personal use only.
1. Ji-Rong Yue, Chang-Quan Huang, Bi-Rong Dong. 2012. Association of serum uric acid with body mass index among long-lived
Chinese. Experimental Gerontology 47:8, 595-600. [CrossRef]
2. Li Nanfang, Guo Yanying, Wang Hongmei, Yan Zhitao, Zhang Juhong, Zhou Ling, Luo Wenli. 2010. Variations of Six
Transmembrane Epithelial Antigen of Prostate 4 (STEAP4) Gene Are Associated with Metabolic Syndrome in a Female Uygur
General Population. Archives of Medical Research 41:6, 449-456. [CrossRef]
Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by TEXAS STATE UNIV on 08/09/13
For personal use only.