GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER RESOURCES ORGANISATION MADURAI REGION MADURAI NAME OF WORK : REPAIR, RENOVATION AND RESTORATION OF AVIYUR WEST TANK IN KARIAPATTI BLOCK OF KARIAPATTI TALUK IN VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, ESTIMATE. RS 41.40 LAKHS VAIPPAR BASIN CIRCLE , VIRUDHUNAGAR GUNDAR BASIN DIVISION, MADURAI GUNDAR BASIN SUB DIVISION, KARIAPATTI DECEMBER - 2014CONTENT 1 S!| item no Title Rage no number 1 1 SECTION - 1 Check list. " 2 2 SECTION - 2 Salient features. 19 3 3 ISECTION - 3 Report. 27 4 4 24 Points check list for Preparation of DPR. 51 5 8 _|27 Points cheok list for release of fund. 53 6 6 48 Points statement of Central Water Commission. 55 7 7 ‘Tank Memoir. 57 8 |Annexures 59 Annex No | Description of Annexure 8 i. Silt storage computation statement for tank. 61 ‘Statement showing the computation of soil required for 9 it 62 [strengthening of bund. to | ii, | Statement showing fortnightly rainfall record for past 12 7 years. 11 | iv. [Statement showing monthly climate data for last 12 years. 64 12] v. Water Balance Statement. 72 a) _|Useful yield computation statement for past 12 years. 73 [Capacity Calculation Table and Evaporation Calculation 13, vi 74 Sheet 2) [Working table abstract for computation of water availabilty in | 7, tank ;;, [Year wise Working table for computation of water availabilty 14) wi 76 in the tank. 15 | vii, [Statement for Computation of fortnightly crop water as requirement using Modified Penman Method. 16 | ix. _|implementation Schedule for Physical and Financial. 401 - 102 17 x. Organisation chart. 103 18 | xi _|B.C. Ratio computation. 19 a) B.C. Ratio computation statement. 104 20 |p) __ [Cree wise yield and value calculation statement before and 408 after advent of project works.Page el Item no Title a no number. zi ¢ English copy of Yield and rate list of Agriculture Department aGr ) and Agricultural products marketing Department. 22 d) _|Village Administrative Officer statement. 109 23 xii ERR computation statement. 411 Minutes of the meeting of District Level Implementing Agency] 24 xii 113 (OLIA) 26 xiv. _ |Panchayat President Letter. 119 26 xv. |Water User Association President Letter. 120 27 xvi. _|List of IS Codes. 121 28 xvii, |Gundar Basin Micro Level Study. 123 29 | xviii. | Soil suitability for Embankment test result certificate 131 30 xix. |Ground water test result Certificate 132 9 — |Certificates 133 Certifi cate |petails of certificates No. 34 i. Land acquisition and free from encroachment certificate. 135 32 ii, _|Estimate Scrutinity Certificate. 136 33 i Lead Certificate. 137 34 iv. Design Approval Certificate. 138 35 v. Water availability certificate. 139 36 vi (Certificate for non funding of this project by other Agency. 140si : Page Item no no i“ number 10 |Designs 141 Design |petails of Design SINo 37 Design of tank surplus weir and its components. 143 38 ii. [Design of each sluice gate and its components, 144 39 ii, | Design of measuring device. 146 40 | iv. [Design of Field channel for each sluice. 148 11 [Drawings 451 Plate No. [Title of the Drawing a i. Trial Pit at Weir and Water Spread Area. 183 42 ii. Lay out plan of tank bund. 154 43. | iii [Capacity Curve of Tank. 155 44 | iv. |Longitudinal section showing top and bottom of tank bund. 186 46 v. _ |Cross section of embankment before and after strengthening. | 157 46| vi. __|Cross Section of sluices . 1” 47 | vii |Cross Section of measuring device. 173, 48| vil |Cross Section of Field Channel 178 49| ix. |Ground Water Recharge Shaft Drawing 177 50 | x, [Colour photograph showing the catchment area, command 179 area , reservoir area, all damaged structures.| St tem no Title ieee 12 |Estimates 191 Estimate Sl! otaiis of Estimates No 51 i. [Abstract of estimate Unit Head wise. 193 s dete ea of estimate (All Components and L.S ies 53 | ii, | Combined Abstract Estimate for all Components. 197 54| iv. [Combined Quantity Estimate for all components 201 55 |v. _|Component wise Abstract of Estimate, a)|Desiting and Tank Bund Strengthening 206 b)|Reconstruction of Sluices 207 0)[Lining to Field Channel with Flow Measuring Devices. 216 d)|Ground Water Recharge Shaft 218 56 | vi _|Component wise Detailed Estimate. a)|Desiting and Tank Bund Strengthening. 219 b)|Reconstruction of Sluices 220 o)|Lining to Field Channel with Flow Measuring Devices. 230 d)|Ground Water Recharge Shatt 233 57 | vi. |Lead statement. 234 58 | viii [Rate analysis and data sheet 235bi Item no Title ereeer 13 Maps 247 Map SI No |Name /Details of Map 59 i Location Map. 249 60 ii, | District Map. 251 61 ili, Block Map. 253, 62 iv. Village Map. 259 63 v Tank Index Map. 261 64 vi. Basin Map. 263 65 vii ‘Sub Basin Map. 265 66 vill. |Catchment Area Map. 267 67 ix. ‘Ayacut Map - GIS Based. (269 68 x. Catchment Area and Ayacut Area Map - GIS Based. 271 69 xi, |Water Spread Area Map - GIS Based. 273 70 xii. Contour Plan Map. 275 71 vx. Quarry Map 277-278wee OL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT SECTION-1 Check List [GENERAL DATA Name of the project REPAIR, RENOVATION AND RESTORATION OF AVIYUR WEST TANK IN KARIAPATT! BLOCK IN KARIAPATTI TALUK OF VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. (UNIQUE CODE No: TNGU- 02-T- 0530) 2 |Location (a) [State(s) [Tarai Nadu (b)[District(s) |Virudhunagar (© [Taluka(syTensitey iKariapatt (@|Longitude/Latitude 78° 4'33°E / 9°42'54°N (@)|Sunvey of india Topographical [58 K/2 Map reference No.(s) @|Earthquake Zone number __|Zone ll 18 code-1895 (part-2002) (@)|Complete address __for|Chief Engineer, Design, Research & ‘correspondence along with pin|Construction Support (ORCS) , Chepauk, lcode/e-mail ichennai, Tamilnadu. Pin Code 600005 3 [Category of the project Repair, Renovation and Restoration (RRR) of Water bodies in Xil PLAN (@)[lnrigation/Multipurpose Irrigation (©)|Storageldiversion Storage i_ [PLANNING 4 Has the Master plan for overaillis being prepared. Jdevelopment of the river basin been prepared and stages of lbasin development discussed ? 5 Have the alternative proposals|No (including set of smaller| developments vis-a-vis a single| large development) —_been| Istudied and their merits and ldemerits discussed?wove 12 [Does the scheme fit in the[Yes loverall development of the river) basin and has its priority in the loverall development of the basin been discussed? iconcerned with the development been informed? Have the other Departments|Yes,Line departments have been informed proposed to be executed injextent stages? If so, are its various Istages of execution and ldevelopment discussed in the report? Is the present _ scheme|No,Proposed to be executed in a single lon the riparian rights & existing} lupstream and downstream] projects etc, discussed? [Are the effects of the scheme|Not applicable. 70 Has the provision for municipallNo land industrial water supply] been made? INTERSTATE AND INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS 1" [Are there any International/interstate issues involved? baat SURVEYS, 12 Have the detailed topographical surveys] Yes been carried out for the following items| jand maps prepared as per prescribed] scales @[River surveys INot applicable (©)|[Reservoir_surveysiwaterspread|Yes area survey (O)[Headwork surveys (dam(s) Yes ldyke(s), barrage(s), weir(s) etc. Jand auxiliary components) (@)|Piant and Colonies’ sites: Not applicable (@)|Canal(s), branch canal(s) and|Not applicable lwater distribution systemweve 13 (D] Major canal structures Not applicable (@|Power house. switch-yard.|Not applicable surge shafts, tailrace (h)| Tunnels). adit(s), penstocks [Not applicable ete. (i [Surveys (detailed and sample) lof areas of the command for| JOFD and drainage works Not applicable [Soi surveys lYes (})[Surveys for soil conservation [Not applicable (Any other surveys .e.No larchaeological, right of way- |communication etc. V. |GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS % Have the geological surveys for| the following items been carried lout and report on geology of the| following appended? [Region as a whole No (©)|[ Reservoir! Tank lYes (@)|Headwork and eneray Not applicable \dissipation area (@|Power house and INot applicable {e)|Intakes and regulators Not applicable [Major canal structures Not applicable (@)[Tunnel(s), Penstook(s), hill(s)|Not applicable etc. {h)|Communication routes Not applicable (|Any other INot applicable 42 [SEISMIC INVESTIGATIONS 14 |Has the seismicity of the region been|Yes Istudied and co-efficient of \verticalmnorizontal acceleration for the [various structures discussed? 15 |Has the approval of the Standing|Not applicable |Committee for recommending design of| lseismic coefficients for River Valley| [Project been obtained? 76 [Is there possibilty of liquefaction of|Not applicable |foundations? If so whether liquefaction] Istudies been carried out?vo. Ob vil. [FOUNDATION INVESTIGATIONS 77 |Have the detailed foundation] investigations (including in-situ tests| land laboratory tests) for the following structures been carried out and detailed| rreport(s) appended? (@]Earth and rock fil dam(s) Not applicable (©)[Masonrylconerete dam(s) INO (©)|Barrage(s)Weir(s)/ head Yes regulator(s) etc @|Canal(s) & Canal Structures __ [Not applicable (@)|Powerhouse(s). tunnel(s);|Not applicable transformer cavern(s), _de-| lspting chamber(s), _surge| ltank(s)/shaft(s), intake(s) (|Pump House(s) Not applicable (@)|Any other Not applicable 78 |Are there any special fealures affecting [No Ithe designs? ‘vin, [CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL SURVEYS 79 |Have the surveys and laboratory tests] lfor the following construction materials| been carried out and _report(s)} lappended? (@[Soiis for impervious. semi-|Yes pervious and pervious zones of earth and rook-fill dam(s) (b)|Sand lYes (| Rock and coarse aggregates _|Yes (Bricks and tiles No (©)|[PozzoIona No (|Cement and time stone Yes (@|Steel Yes (h)| Any other Not applicable 20 |Have the sources for each of the abovelYes material been identified and need etc. indicated? 21 [Have the proposals for procurement of[Not applicable Iscarce materials been indicated?Jove 05 HYDROLOGICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS (@][Have the hydrological and] Imeteorological _ investigations| lbeen carried out and status of| Hollowing data discussed in| report? (| Rainfall Yes. (i fTemperature lYes. (i|Sunshine Yes. (i) Gauge & Discharge Yes. (w)|Sediment Yes (w)|Water quality Yes: (vi) [Evaporation Yes. (b)|Has the above data been collected & appended? |Appended in Report. HYDROLOGY 23 Is the hydrology dealt with in detail in a separate volume? Have its brief details} been included in this Report? Yes. 24 Have an index map and bar chart|Yes. showing locations of various hydro-| Imetric, climatic and rainfall stations lexistinglongoing/planned water| resources projects and the data| lavailabilty at those stations been!| attached? 25 lave required detail note about project Ispecitic hydro-meteorological data lobservatories been attached. lYes. 26 Have required detail in case _of|Not applicable Himalayan rivers, if project being planned in upper reaches, the satellite Imageries of project catchment] lespecially one during snowmelt period \(March-May) and one during monsoon |(June-September) period been lattached? oF [Are detail notes about quality, lconsistency, processing and gap filing lof the data included No 28 Have hydrological studies been carried lout for the following:2 06 (@)]To establish the availability offYes. water for the benefits| lenvisaged? (b)|To determine design flood forlYes Ithe various structures (spillway. lweir, barrage ete.) (@)|Sediments storage Yes (d) [Command area rainfall lYes 28 (existing use and additional availability) been indicated? 30 Have the studies regarding reservoir|No |sedimentation been carried out and revised elevation-area| capacity curves been used in the| simulation studies (Working Table)? 34 ave the ecological requirements of|No. lwater such.as low flow augmentation] land water quality control eto. and water| requirement for domestic, industrial use| land power generation (thermal, hydel, nuclear) been considered and included] in the Project Report and incorporated| in the simulation studies? 32 Have the details of the simulation|Yes lstudies (Working Tables) andl conclusions arrived from the various| alternatives explaining the factors and] lassumptions been included and discussed? 33 Has the number of failures for different|Yes aspects been indicated? 34 Have the likely desirable and|No lundesirable changes in the hydrologic| regime due to the project been brought lout in the report? 35 Is the ofteria adopted for selection of|Not applicable Ithe construction diversion _ flood discussed? 38 Has the basis for determining the|Yes |storage capacity been discussed.? a7 Have integrated working tables (for|No more than one reservoir in the system)} been prepared? Has the Ground Water Potential] Yes, wherever neccessaryfue OF 38 Has carry over storage been provided?| If so, whether studies for most] leconomic carry over storage been| ldone? No 39 Have the flood routing studies, been| carried out? INo 40 Have the back water studies been| carried out? No XI LAND ‘ACQUISITION ‘AND| RESETTLEMENT OF OUSTEES \(Sl.no: 41-44) Not applicable Ix. DESIGNS 5 Does the state have established a] Central Design Organisation and State| level multidisciplinary _Advisory| Committee and whether its composition] has been indicated in the report? [Yes 46 Has the selection of final location of the| lheadworks and appurtenances, _ in| preference to the other _sites| investigated been discussed? Not applicable a7 Have the layout of the project viz location of headworks, workshop sheds, ldikes, colonies etc. been finalised and ldiscussed? INot applicable 4B Has the layout of the various major| lcomponents of the headworks been! ldiscussed in the light of site features, lgeology, foundation characteristics etc? lYes 49 Have the detailed designs _ been] prepared for the following components |& got vetted by CDO? (@)|Earth or rockfil dam, masonry| lor concrete dam, spillway, barrage, weir, etc. and lappurtenances. Yes ()|Energy dissipation larrangements, training walls} etc. INo| (Openings through dams-| lgalleries, head regulators, lpenstocks other outlets, siuices| etc. Yes“--~ 08 (Regulators No (e)|Canal and water conductor [No system (|Canal structures INo {g)|Pump house, intake structures [No (h)|Power House, tunnels, surge [No shaft (Jinstrumentation INo ()|Power evacuation arrangement [No (h)|Design of Hydro Mechanical [No equipments Have the salient features of the abovelYes icomponents and the assumptions made| in the design of above components of) lthe project been indicated and their basis discussed? [Have any model studies been carried|Not applicable lout for location of the ‘dam, spillway and! lother appurtenances & checking the| design profile of the spillway, energy| dissipation arrangement & location of loutlets/regulators etc? Has the final alignment of canals) and|Not applicable lbranch canals(s) been discussed in the| light of various alignments studied? {a)|Does the canal design provide|Not applicable for meeting requirements of rush irrigation? (b)|Have any intermediate storages|Not applicable land tail tanks been considered! to reduce the canal capacities? [Are the canals and distribution system|Not applicable being lined and if so what is the] minimum capacity of the channel [proposed to be lined? Is the location of canal structures on|Not applicable main and branch canals fixed after detailed surveys of the final alignments? [Are the regulation arrangements of the|Not applicable loff-taking channel both near and away) lirom the cross regulators discussed?wiv~ OF 8 [Are sufficient escapes Including lterminal escapes provided on the| main/oranch canal \distributaries/minors? Not applicable a7 Have the basis for adopting water way) lfor the cross drainage works been| discussed? [Not applicable 3B Have the proposals for rating the canal section by providing standing wave| flumes, rating of the falls, broad crested lweirs. V- notches etc. been discussed {or the canal and distribution system? Not applicable Ex} Have any model studies for major canal Istructure(s) been carried out and if so are the results discussed and incorporated in the design? Not applicable xl, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT Have the conveyance and field irigation] efficiencies for paddy and upland crops| during kharif, rabi etc. been indicated, discussed and justified? [Yes 6 Have the 10-dailyimonthly crop water| requirements at the canal head been lworked out? Not applicable 2 lAre there any proposals for introducing lwarabandi and if so have these| proposals been discussed in the report land sample calculations for a typical distributary/minor/sub-minor furnished? [Yes, through WUA Co Has the present position of irrigation in Ithe command through existing canals, tanks, lift schemes, wells etc. been| brought out in the report? lYes 64 [Are the particulars of all_irrigation| projects (including minor _schemes)} lexisting/proposed in the command been indicated? No 6 [Are there any potential areas, where lground water is available? If so, has the lquantity & quality of the ground water| been indicated? INot applicable».v~ 10 Has the quantum of available ground|No lwater been assessed and plan for its| Iconjunctive use with surface water been| prepared and incorporated in the| report? 67 ave the somidelailed sof surveys|Yes been carried out for the entire ‘command if not the extent of area| Isurveyed may be indicated 68 Have soll and land _irigability[Yes classifications brought out in the report?| 6 Is the method used for determining the] Yes Icrop water requirements discussed? 70 as the pre-project cropping pattem|Yes land the proposed cropping pattern| ‘alongwith justification been. furnished? 7A Has the proposed cropping pattern|Yes been certified by _Centre/State| lAgricultural Authorities giving _ the| statement of having considered the soll Icharacteristics and land _irrigability Icharacteristics of the command area in] ldeciding the percentage of _the| command area falling under respective| Icrops as suggested in DPR. 72 IWhether drinking water needs of the|No population projected for the 25-30 years| fafter construction of the project on| lenroute and that in the command of the| |project considered. 73 certified by CGWB and a statement] Hturnished. 74 ‘Are the areas and percentages of thelYes. ICCA that will be irrigated during kharif, abi, two seasonal, summer and perennial been indicated? 75 perennials and summer crops from the lWhether the proposed G.W utilisation is|Not applicable Is justification furnished for irrigating|Not applicablewie 1 ul 76 Have the monthly reservoir operation] [studies been carried out at least for 20} lyears and summary on annual ‘basis| lattached? No 77 ave the number of blocks selected for] ldetailed surveys for On Farm| Development (OFD) works including drainage and total area covered by| Isuch blocks been indicated? No 78 Have the existing locations of the Trial] Jcum Demonstration Farm, input centres| (seeds, fertiliser and insecticides) in] ithe command been indicated and| lproposal_to strengthen the same| discussed? INo 78 Have the arrangements for financing| the OFD works and proposals, if any, lfor strengthening the same been ldiscussed? lYes, is being dealt and to be prepared by |Agriculture Engineering department. 80 Have the agencies responsible for] lexecution of OFD works been identified Jand simultaneous planning of execution lof OFD works along with engineering lworks dicussed? |Yes. OFD works to be taken, a Has the year-wise phasing of irrigation ldevelopment as a result of the project] lbeen discussed? Yes. a2 is the existing communication system telephone. wireless androads within| lcommand area sufficient to meet the| requirementafter full development of irrigation? If not, have the newproposals| been planned and discussed? Yes Ex} is the adequacy of the marketing centres in the Command Areaand new proposals to meet the requirements after fulldevelopment of irrigation been| \discussed? Yes. Existing marketing facilities is ladequate for storage to meet the lrequirements afer full development of irrigation oe is there any stabiisation of existing irrigation proposed? lYes’ xiv. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE (Sl.no 85-87) Not applicable~ 12 88 [Have the following drainage aspects of, |command area- been discussed? lYes, surplus drains into natural earthen Jcourse, hence water logging does not arise. problems of the congestion, water alkalinity? salinity if any. (@JExisting Surface and sub-|No Isurface drainage network and drainage| logging, (pre-monsoon, etc). ()|Studies on sub soil water tabie|No Ppost-monsoon| day rainfall, (©)|Maximum intensity of 1, 2 and 3/No_ (@|Deficiencies in farm drains. No {(@)|Deficiencies in existing natural ldrains No |crainagerwater lalongwith justification thereof. (H|Propasal for improvement of/No logging/} lalkalinity/salinity of the areal Command which will etc. (@)|ldentification of the area in|No gel lbenefited due to execution of ldrainage net-work and benefits thereof in terms of relief from| jcrop damage, increased yields| xv. NAVIGATION (SI.no 89-97) Not applicable Xv. POWER(SI.no 98) INot applicable xvi. proposed to be done departmentally or {through contractor? 700 Have the various __allernative|No construction programme beenstudied| land proper justification furnished for the final programme adopted? CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME AND PLANT AND MANPOWER PLANNING JAre the major components of work|Through contractor.weds 13 701 [Has the proposed _construction|Yes programme been prepared landsynchronised for timely completion| lof each of the major component of work| including ‘Command Area| Development? 102 [Have the year wise quantities of the|Yes following materials of construction been| |worked out for various components of the project (@)| Excavation separately in-soft [Yes land hard strata ()|Earthworkin filing-mpervious, |Yes |serni-pervious and pervious (©)|Rockfill for dam, toe, riprap ete-|No (@)|[Stone for masonry Yes (@)|Coarse aggregate for concrete [Yes ()|Sand- for filer lYes Imasonryiconcrete (@)|Graver-for fiter lYes (h)|Steel of various sizes and type [Yes ()|Cement-normal, quick/siow [Yes setting with or without |pozzolona, special types @]Lime-surkhi-pozzoiona No (k)|Scarce material-special steel [No ()|Other material-fuel, electricity, [No lexplosive etc. 703 |Have the year wise quantities to belYes lexecuted by machine! labour for each lof the major component been worked lout for each of the above material? 7104 |Have the labour intensive items of the| \various majorcomponents of the project| lbeen identified and the quantities off lsuch items worked out? INot applicable 105 |Have PERT chart or CPM diagrams forlYes. lconstruction programmeof —_various| |components been made and included in| report? Has organisational set up and lfrequency for project monitoring been| indicated in the Report?. FOREIGN EXCHANGE XVIII (Sino 406-109) Not applicablewy XIX, FINANCIAL RESOURCES 7710 Has the concurrence of the StatelYes Finance Department been obtained? 1 is the scheme included in the FivelYes. lYear/Annual Plan? If notwhat is the] present position regarding its inclusion in the plan? 12 lWhether the scheme has already been|No started? If so, is thepresent stage of| [construction indicated? 113 [Have the yearwise requirement of funds|Yes lbeen indicated? 14 Is the scheme covered or proposed to|No Ibe covered under any _foreign| lassistance/aid agreement?” ESTIMATE 115 is the separate volume of estimate[No lattached as appendix? 116 Is the year fo which the rates adopted in] Yes. Ithe estimate relate to indicated? 7 Have the analysis of rates for various|Yes. Imajor items of work for the major| lcomponents of the project been| lturnished and with basis of analysis| described? 118 [Are the provision for the following items| made on the basis of sample survey| land sub-estimates’ (@)|Distributaries, minor and sub- [No minors (b)|Water courses Yes’ (0)[Drainage No (@|CAD Works No Ixxt. REVENUE 7119 lAre the basis for the following sources| lof revenues furnished? {@)[Betterment levy and proposal [No ()lirrigation cess No (0)|Fiood protection cess No (@|Crop wise water rates Noase 15 (@)]Sale of water for village/ city? [No industrial’ power! water supply (|Miscellaneous No 120 Ithe existing rates at the other projects in| ithe State/region? Have these rates been compared with|No 721 In case the rates are being enhanced has the concurrence of theconcermed| |department(s) been obtained?. No 122, Have the organisational set up for the| collection of revenue been indicated? Yes xxi B.C. RATIO 123 [Are the allocated cost for the following] components of themultipurpose project |worked out and basis therein furnished? (@)jirigation Yes. (b)|Power |Not applicable {(6)|Flood Controt Not applicable (@)|Navigation Not applicable (@)|Water supply Not applicable (|Any other INot applicable 124 IState/Centre agreed to the sharing of Ithe above allocated cost? |Have the various departments of the|Not applicable 125 lworked out for irrigated and un irrigated lcrops being grown before project in| lconsuttationwith the agriculture ldepartment and statement furnished? Have the crop wise benefits been|Yes. 126 Have the crop wise benefits been worked out, for proposedcropping patter after the introduction of irigation| iin consultation with the agriculture| \department and statement furnished? Yes. a7 lacceptable or otherwise justified? Is the B.C. ratio of Irrigation Projects|Acceptable. 128 Is the 8.C. Ratio for Flood Control Projects acceptable otherwise justified? Not applicableve 16 129 Is the B.C. ratio for power component of]Not applicable Ithe project acceptable —otherwise| liustified? 130 [Have the financial and economic retum|Not applicable statements been furnished keeping in| view the phasing of development? 731 [Are the benefits other than those|No lconsidered in the B.C. Ratio and| linancial return statement been! identified? 732 |Is the benefit from Gallper land, if|No proposed, based on _—lease ratesadmissible and statement from| lconcerned Central/State authorities| jrurnished? 733 [Are the benefits from fisheries, |No horticulture, if proposed, based onlease| rates admissible and statement from lconcerned Central’ State authorities furnished. [xxill, [ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS 734 | (a)jis the area likely to have any of[No the following environmentaland lecological problems due to the| laltered surface water pattern? If les, whether preventive measures have —_been| ldiscussed? ()|Excessive sedimentation of the|No reservoir and the upper reaches| lof the river and its tributaries| tailing into reservoir (| Water logging, salinity/ alkalinity|No (i |Qualiy of surface and ground|No Iwater (i)|Ground water recharge Yes (W)|Health hazards-water_ bome|No ldiseases, industrial pollution] letc. (w)[Submergence of _ important|No minerals depositseve 47 a (vil)|Submergence ‘of|No Imonuments/archeological sites (vii) Fish culture and aquatic life [No (Go) [Piant ife (foray No (Go| Wid Lite No ‘(| Migratory birds No (xi [National parks and sanctuaries [No (iii)|Seismicity, due to filling of/No reservoir (kiv|Likely change in the regime of]No. the river (a) [Any other No (Have the environmental and|Not applicable Htorest clearances from MOE & F been obtained? If not what is status thereof? COLONIES AND BUILDINGS (/SLNo 135 to 140) Not applicable XXIV, xxv. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND COOPERATION 141 [Are the possibilities of these been] discussed in: (@)[Planning Yes (©)|Construction No (Olimproved agricultural practices [Yes (@JAny other No 742 [Have public debates about utility offves projects been held and theresponse| thereof outlined in the Report? xxv1.|SOIL CONSERVATION 743 |Is the need for soil conservation|ves measures in the catchment of the project discussed? rac wih jineetPWD/WRO Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD/WRO Ex Enjhieer, PWD/WRO irae cen san Bala a coals Vaippar Basin Ciel dural Region Virudhunagar Madurai yon - a t- 184 section:2-~- 19 SALIENT FEATURES it [ems of Mie prolect IREPAIR, RENOVATION AND RESTORATION| JOF AVIYUR WEST TANK IN KARIAPATTI IBLOCK IN KARIAPATTI TALUK OF| VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. (UNIQUE| JCODE No: TNGU -02-T0530) 2 |Type of Project (Irrigation or Multipurpose) Trigation 3_ [Location 31 [River Basin @]Name Gundar basin [Located in Dpsatew) Tamilnadu (i|Couniries (Fintermational river Not Applicable 32. [River] Tributary Gundar 33 |State(s) 7 Districts) 7 Taluka(e) or Tehsis in lwhich following are located: (@)]Reservoir TamilnaduiVirudhunagariKariapatti (H)|Readwork : (@| Command Area TamilnadulVirudhunagariKariapatt (@)|Power house a 3a_[Name of vilage near the Head.works ‘Aviyar Vilage 3S [Location of Head-works : a[Lonsitude 78 4°33" (latitude 4254" (llies in Earthquake Zone No Zone I 36_ [Project area reference to: (@)[Degree Sheets 58K (b) [Index Plan Enclosed 3:7 [Access to the project Distance from project ste Airport Madurai 31Km Rail head Thiruchull 30Km (@)[Road head Kariapatti 7m (@|[River port = = (e}[Sea port Tutucorine iv 38 [Rail Road transportation limit of TaWeighis 70MT (b)[Dimensions (Lx BxA) BK2EX1.8m 4 international 7 Interstate aspects of the| No Intemational / Interstate aspecis arise in project this project 5 Estimated life of the project (years) 30 yearsme eo 6 Irrigation (ha.) sata By flow By lift {@)|Gross command area (GCA) 52.71 2 (6)|Culturable command area (CCA) 5271 z {@)[Area under Irrigation (break up): a [Khari S277 : Rabi = = Hot weather 5 = (iv) Two seasonal : : ()[Perennial a (W)|Gross irigated area (GIA 5271 - (vid| Gross irrigated area (GIAVCCA™100 = y (vii)[District(s) Benefited (iF the district benefited is predominantly tribal of| Drought prone area of drought prone, it may be so indicated] Virudhunagar district. a against each strict). }* Irigated area under Kharif, two seasonal, perent nial, rabi and hot weather shall be indicated. (@)]Cost per hectare of gross area inrigated Rs.78543/- (©)|Cost per 1000 cum of grossfive storage Not Applicable {(H|Cost per 1000 cum of water delivered at the (Canal head/outlet) Not Applicable (@)|Water utilisation 52.71 Flood control Not Applicable Navigation Not Applicable co] | Water supply Not Applicable Project Performance Period of simulation No. of failure (a)[irrigation 1999-2010 (b)|Power (c)|Flood Control (d)| Water Supp) (e)| Navigation. 74_|Rydrology 14.1 [Catchments 11.11 [Catchments area at headwork site (sq. km) (a[Gross 12.02 sq.km (b)lintercepted (By existing projects, 8.94 sqkm {ii [By ongoing projects (ii) By contemplated projects: (o)[Un intercepted 17.1.2 [Catchments area classification according to Imode of precipitation (sq. km.) (a)[Rain fed 12.02 84,km (b)|Snow fed2 112 [Precipitation oer 914.03 mm 11.2.1 [Catchments aa ‘Snowiall (mm) Monsoon (Sept-Jan.) peek (@)[Average 748.27 mm z (0)|Maximum 932.80 mm : (@)[Minimum 14.00 mm a (a)|Co-efficient of variation 5 7122 |Command ‘Cropping Season Kharif 5 Rabi (June Hot Annual |(September- December) | October) | (March-May) a)[Average 314.03 mm : 3 (b)|80% dependable 731.22 mm ~ - (@\ETO (mm) S0imm = 773 [Annual yield calculated at the proposed site (Mm) Gross Net (a)| Maximum 1.89 : (@)| Minimum O72 5 (o)lAverage 7.30 (d)|Dependabie (per cent) 75% 5 Monsoon Annu Wune-Oct) {50 Fr (in|75: S years out of 12 years = (ii)}90 = iv)|o8 = 11.4 [Climatic Data (Command) Enclosed ‘Annexure =v 11.4.4 [Name of Station(s) and period of record Kavalur ae aa Period of Record From To a Kavalur 2003 2011 11-42 [Data ( average of all stations in command area ) Maximum Minimum (2)/air temp. CC) 35.34°C 24.2°C (b)| Humidity (per cent) 65% 61% (©)]Wind (km/hr) 6.56 kmph 3.31 kmph (d)| Water temperature (°C) - 1 |eismic coeticients Zone I! with Zone factor 0,10 118 lUtlisation within the State (Mm) Not Applicable 7 11.6.1 |Water availabilty (State's share in case of interstate river) Not Apprea ;11.6.2 [Committed Utlisation 5 (@[Upstream Projects Medium Minor ()][Projects completed Not Applicable = (")] Projects under construction Not Applicable - Gil) Future projects No : (w)|Any other Not Applicable : (©)|Downstream Projects Medium Minor ()]Projects completed Not Applicable (Projects under construction Not Applicable (iid| Future projects: No. (iv)JAny other Not Applicable 1163 Proposed utilisation by the project [allirigation ()]Kharif 2.71 (i)|Rabi (ii) |Hot Weather (iv)|Perennials Total:- Bari (b]|Water Supph No 17 Floods near the headwork site No) 1174 Historical-period of record from 1980s to 2014 Location(s) i 2 3 [4 (a]| Maximum water level (elv-ma) 16.750 (©)]Maximum Discharge estimated (m/s) 18.87m%Is (lear of occurrence, date 2004 V7.2 |Observed-period of record from 1980s to 2014 Location(s) 7 2 3 [4 (@)]Maximum water level (Elm) 16.750 ()] Maximum Discharge (m°/s.) 18.87m3/s (@)| Year of occurrence, date 2004 173 Estimated Flood Magnitude (m’/s.) (@)]50 year retum period (b)|100 year return period (c)|1000 year return period (G)] Standard project flood (©)|Maximum probable flood( 10 year return period) WT4 [Design flood (m*/s.) @Dam (®)|WeiriBarrage (¢)|Construction Diversion (d}|Flood Control Works 1175 River flows (minimum observed) (@)|Water level (EL-m) @))pischarge (m/s, (@)[Months of ‘ni flow, any, Not applicable23 12, [Reservoir/Tank wae ed 12.1 [Water levels (E-m) (@)|Maximum Water Level (MWL) aoe (D)| Full Reservoir Level (FRL) 76.150 (©)|Minimum Draw Down Level (MDDL) 73.260 (@)|Outiet levels ()firigation 73.260 )|Power 5 {i [Others (Please specify) : (@)|Dead Storage Level 73.260 42.2 |Free board (m) 4.00 12.3 [Wave height (rm) : 12.4 |Live storage (Mm*) 0.704 125 [Capacity (am) at (@)] Maximum water level O77 (©)|Full reservoir level 074 (©)|Minimum draw down level 0.07 (d)|Dead storage level 0.07 12.6 Flood absorption capacity (Mm") (@)[Below FRL 5 (b)[Between FRE & MAW 12.7 |Sedimentation (Mm*) and levels after (0.036 Mm’ of Sedimentation occurs in the past 60 years against the original capacity ‘of 0.74 Mm’. ( Annexure - i) Years Years 50 7100 @)[Above MODL - - b)|Below MDDL. : 7 (c)[Encroachment of ive storage (per cent) z e (@)|Newzero elevation = : 128 i [Average monthly evaporation losses from the Nok eH reservoir (Mm*) ‘Month Average Evaporation Loss (Mm’). January = February = March = [Apri = May = [June 0.002 Luly’ 0.008 [August 0.024 [Septemb 0.028 (October 0.032 INovembe 0.031 Decembe 0.083 12.9 |Seepage in the reservoir 13 submergence Not applicable 14 _[Headworks Not applicable 141 [Dam/Tank Tank1471 [Embankment Dam Gee ar (l[ipe of dam omogenous/ZonedRock eanetoes {(b)]Length of the dam at top (m) 2440 ‘(O]Right Flank (Lett Flank (©)[Top width (rm), 3.00m (@)|Maximum Height above G.L. (m) 450m (]Right Flank (i]tet Flank (©)[Dvkets) Tai? sony ‘and Conerete Dam (Non-over flow Netapileable 14.1.3 |spittway (overfiow section) Not applicable 14.14 [River sluice(s), Irigation/Power oullet(s), Tank sluices (@)|Purpose : Sluice No | SluicoNo (by|Number 7 2 (Size (mp 0.15%0.16m_| 0.16x0.15m (@]Silievet (Lm) 18.280 13.580 ‘()[Discharging capacity at (m7s,) O]Fult reservoir level 0.075 o.071 (Ieinimum draw down level [Number of gates 2 (G)|Type of gate Plug rod (h)|Size of gate (mam) 0.18x0.15m bial | Type of hoisting arrangement and ts lease capaci 142 [Barrage Not appleable 14.3 [Weir (8)|Type of weir B.C.Weir ®)|Length of weir (mp 48.00M (©)[Deepest foundation (Elm) 11.760 (2) type of energy dissipation arrangement - (©)[Crest ievel (E-m) 16.160 (O|Maximum water level (Elm) 16.750 (@)| Tail water level (Em) ()[Maximum = Gi) Minimum ‘ a discharging (m*/s) capacity 41.38 144 Head Regulator(s) Not applicableIE) [Fiom tank, water et ot realy to 15 canal system ©9 | Fic(tei irigation crane through tank shice 46 |Gropping Pattern Present (CCA) Tsing Proposed _| 767 [Name of crop (season-wise) @lpa Tq) | TOR (No Pasay 57.00% (43.00% suffering) | 100" i7_|Power ot applicable 18 Construction eciies Not applicable 19_[Cost 41.40 ais 78.1 |Gost ofthe project (Re. Lak) Uniwice (Refer [Pas l Section-3 pare 18) FB |Alocates cost (Rs. lakh) ‘@)iigation 1a ais 20 [Benefts/Revenue 20.1 Benefits Benetis ‘em ‘Quantity | Unit price |Vaive Re. lakh (@] [Food Production fenne) 76476 [13600 [22.41 Tota: 16478 | 13600 [22.41 202 [Revenue Rovere item Guantiy J Rate | Amount lakh 7 Betermentiewy 7 = 2 [Water Rates = = Being cotectes 3 [ligation Coss - ~ | byrevenue slong wth ond = [others “ata WH [Bensft Cost Ratio = (a)[8.C. Ratio (@liigation ao with Cost oF CAD : Pathout cost of CAD, = [Flood control 7 ‘wlPower 7 Diftteral Rate Of Return F516 [wih cost of CAD without cost of CAD E (GBC. Ratio with discounted cash flow meth iregation 7 Faith cost of CO = Fithout cost of CAD ‘@[Finaneal Rate of Return with cost of CAD = [athout cost of GAD. 5 @ arpa Basin Circe Viedhunagar gproesae_nethay sheen neha section evant ‘Ganda basin sub Division Kiepatt “>ye 26ve. al SECTION—-3 REPORT 4. INTRODUCTION Agriculture remains the predominant activity in our country. All the more irrigation is considered as a comer stone in Tamil Nadu Agriculture development on which the livelihood of more than 60% of population depends. Tamil Nadu has more than 6% of the country's population, but has only 3% of country's renewable water resources and 4% of country’s land area for service delivery Repair, Renovation and Restoration of water bodies assumes significance. Tamil Nadu having an extent of 130058 Sq.Km with 7.24 crore population has been managing with available water resources of 1582 T.M.Cft, Including 261 T.M.Cft. Contributed by the neighbouring states for its drinking, domestic, agriculture, industrial, power and other purposes through 85 large dams and 4 small dams built having combined storage capacity of 238.58 T.M.Cft, and also maintaining 13,779 tanks. The entire water resources depend on the rain fall. Even though the average rain fall of Tamil Nadu is 914.60mm, rain fall is highly undependable and sporadic. The total downpour happens during the monsoon that too with in a short period. The demand for water in Tamil Nadu is increasing at a fast rate due to growing population, Urbanization, industrialization and economic development. Although irrigation demand is the major component of water use in our State, demands from other sectors such as domestic and industries have been growing significantly. Water requirement of various sectors has been increasing and the Land use patterns have also been changing, and about 98% of the utilizable surface water potential are already exploited and ground water utilization faces limitations, increasing the Water Use Efficiency in the existing systems through modernization of the projects for improving the service delivery of irrigated agriculture to ensure required food production and overall growth assume great importance. A pilot scheme for Repair, Renovation and Restoration of water bodies directly linked to agriculture was launched in January 2005 by the Government of India for implementation during the remaining period of X" plan with an outlay of Rs. 300 Crore. The scheme was sanctioned in respect of 1098 water bodies in 26 districts of 18 States with a target to cerdit 0.78 Lakh hectares of additional Irrigation potential. Under the above scheme 46 tanks in Villupuram and Sivagangai districts of Tamil Nadu were rehabilitated there by increasing the irrigation potential. Based on the success of the pilot scheme and need for comprehensive programme to upscale the gains from water bodies, the Ministry of water Resources has launched a State sector scheme with domestic budgetary support for Repair, Renovation and Restoration of Water bodies during the X" plan period covering 334 water bodies at a cost of Rs. 1309.16 Crores with CCA of 3.094 lakh ha and subsequently RRR Scheme for the XII" plan period covering 10000 water bodies at a cost of Rs 10000 Crores.ii) iii) The Aviyur West tank is an age old water body lying in therkkar sub Basin of Gundarbasin in Tamil Nadu. Administratively this lies in under developed backward Kariapatti block of Virudhunagar District in Tamil Nadu. Most of the people living in this village are marginal and small farmers and their main occupation is agriculture. The cultivation mainly depends upon the north east monsoon. Large quantity of water is required for agricultural purposes but due to the scarcity of surface water, ground water is used in large extent. ‘As per G.O(MS) No:52 PW(R2) dept dated 02/03/2012 Ground Water the Kariapatti block in Virudhunagar District of Tamil Nadu is classified as Semi critical category block. As per The Government of India notification Kariapatti block in Virudhunagar District of Tamil Nadu is classified as Drought Prone Block. This DPR is prepared for the Rehabilitation of Aviyur West tank in Kariapatti Block of Kariapatti taluk of Virudhunagar district for the Xilth Plan Period, Aim of the project * Comprehensive improvement and restoration of water bodies Ground water recharge Improvement in agriculture productivity and income of farmers Improvement of catchment areas of tank command Environment benefits through Improved water use efficiently by promotion of conjunctive use of surface and ground water. ‘Community participation and self supporting system for sustainable management for water body. Capacity building of communities in better water management Development of tourism, cultural activities. Location: The Aviyur West tank is situated at a distance of about 0.5km from Aviyur village in Kariapatti Taluk of Virudhunagar District and it is under Gundar Basin. The geographical location of the village the tank is at Latitude - 09°42'54"N and Longitude - 78°04'33"E The main airport located at Madurai is 31km from the project area, The railway station is located at Thiruchulli which is 30km from the project area. The nearest sea portis located at Tuticorin which is 157km away from the project area,fete 29 The Aviyur West tank is at a distance of 7 km from Kariapatti town which located in Madurai and Tuticorin Highway NH 45B iv) Climatology: The climate of Tamil Nadu is tropical in nature with little variation in summer and winter temperatures. The mean annual temperature for Virudhunagar district is 28.90°C , while the maximum and minimum temperature is 23.57°C. and 34.23°C The data’s are collected from the District Soil Atlas of Virudhunagar District published by the Department of Agriculture, Tamilnadu. The details of this tank on the basis of evaporation, temperature, humidity, sunshine and wind velocity is available for the Kavalur watershed and itis located in Latitude 9°34'20"N Longitude 77°54'05"E, which is the representative of the agro climatological zone to which the tank belongs. (Annexure: iv ) v) Topography, Physiography and Geology of the Area: The district is a inland district lies between 9°12'00" and 9°47'00 Nand 77°2000" and 78°24'00 E . The Aviyur West tank is located about 0.5 km from Aviyur village . The Aviyur West tank Receives water from Kilavanery Supply Channel from therkkar river and its own catchment.The surplus water drains to Aviyur East Tank . Higher elevated lands and Flat plans land with gradient towards northeast direction up to sea. The Geological composition are Gneissic rock of Archaen age consisting of chamockites, granite and groups of gneissic rocks. vi) Population: By implementing this project no population is affected and the benefit population are as follows: sc - 263 persons ST - Nil OBC - 2219 persons Occupation Agriculture - 1485 persons Other than Agriculture - 1017 persons vil) Natural resources: Significant resources are not available in the command area. The people living in this village are marginal and small farmers and their main occupation is agriculture.4° vill) Land use and socio-economic aspects: x) xi) xii) The Aviyur west village where the tank is located have about 2482 inhabitants and most of them are agriculturalists and labourers. The average size of the farm holding is about 0.04 ha. The relevant farm size and the number of farmers are as follows: i) Less than Tha — 1136 farmers ii) Between 1 to 2 ha — 300 farmers il) Above 2 ha = 30 farmers [Cand use [Crop [Actual area Cultivated area Paddy Details of cultivated area are as per the revenue record of the village History: (Annexure xii (e) ) Choice of project: The Aviyur West tank is an age old water body located in Aviyur village were Agriculture remains the predominant activity for the livelihood of the people. The Aviyur West tank which is located in this village plays a potential role in supplying water for agriculture. Due to siltation in the long run the holding capacity of the water body is found to be greatly reduced and it has become necessary to remove the silted materials to enhance the holding capacity of the Aviyur West tank. Due to constant use by the farmers and aging, bund has lost its shape and needs standardisation confirming to IS: 12169 -1987. To increase discharge efficiency the sluice also needs rehabilitation to arrest leakages. Due to age, the Weir is in a dilapidated condition requiring repairs. Repair, Renovation and Restoration of Aviyur West tank is to be urgently taken up and the estimate is prepared to renovate various components of the like Tank Bund, Sluices, Field channel etc., to increase the efficiency of the water supply for agricultural purposes. Stages/phases of development of the project: The tank which comes under minor irrigation category the RRR work can be completed in a single extent of one year duration. The project has tank bund strengthening, sluice improvement, weir improvement and de-siling the supply channel Fitment of the scheme in overall development of the river basin: The tank is located in the Therkkar sub Basin Sub Basin of Gundar basin, it also forms a part in the development of entire basin. Intimation to the other development authorities regarding this Scheme: The district level implementing and monitoring committee formed vide District Collector Virudhunagar Pro.No.ROC/G1/11835/2012.Dated-07/08/2012 headed by District Collector Virudhunagar and comprising 1.Executive Engineer, WRD, Vaippar basin Division, VirudhunagarlMember Secretary, 2. Executive Engineer, Ground Water Division, Karaikudi 3. Joint Director of Agriculture, Virudhunagar 4. Executive Engineer, Planning & Designs Division Karaikudi meeting held on 1.08.2014 for deciding issues relating to implementation, management, supervision and effectiveness of the RRR scheme of Aviyur West tank and approved.(Annexure - ii)xii) xiv) xv) xvi) wil) vil) i) a 31 Public announcement and public hearings: ‘A meeting has been conducted with the panchayat president and farmers ‘on 18.08.2014 and the different components contemplated in the Repair, Renovation and Restoration of Aviyur West tank were discussed and decided to incorporate following components such as strengthening the bund, reconstruction of sluice and also lining of field channels. The villagers are welcoming this project and assured to co-operate with the project. (Annexure- xiv ) Inter-linking of the scheme with neighbouring schemes: Scheme is in DPAP area and no Inter-linking of the scheme with neighbouring schemes is envisaged. Inter-state/International aspect(s): The whole Gundar basin is with in Tamilnadu state. Hence the need of Interstate water dispute does not arises. Cost and Benefit of the scheme: The overall cost of the project is 41.4 lakhs. The benefit of the project is increase in paddy production by 164.76 tonnes and value of Rs 22.41 Lakhs Public Cooperation and participation: The local panchayat water users association and public were taken into confidence at the time of preparation of DPR and Public Cooperation and Participation are ensured for implementation of this Repair, Renovation and Restoration of Aviyur West tank. During the field survey the public were enthusiastic on the scope of probable fruitification of the project as it will be ensure water availability for irrigation as well as improve irrigation efficiency apart from helping ground water recharge in this semicritical block, and is very much welcomed by the public. (Annexure- xvi ) Provision for domestic and industrial power supply: The tank is mainly used for agricultural purpose and indirectly serves the needs of people's drinking water requirement through ground water recharge and not for industrial water supply. 2 PHYSICAL FEATURES: Geographical disposition: The tank is located near right flank of Aviyur east tank . The topography is almost plain with slope from north to east. The other type of soil in the area is clay and clay loam soil is foundfees 32 ii) Topography of the basin, reservoir and command area: Gundar river basin covers an area of about 569023 sq.km. and located in the Theni, Madurai , sivagangai, Virudunagar .Ramnad and thoothugodi Districts of Tamil Nadu. It lies between the geographic co-ordinates Lat. 9°1200" and 9°47'00 N and Long. 77°20'00" and 78°24'00 E and falls within the Survey of India degree sheets 58K/2. The total extent of the area is covered within the administrative boundaries of 14 taluks and 21 blocks of which 14 blocks are full and the remaining 7 blocks are part. The basin is bordered on the north by vaigai and Kottakariyar basins, south by Vaippar basin , west by periyar basin and east by Bay of bengal . The length of basin is about 150 km and the width varies from 10-100 km . Madurai is located in the centre of the basin. Usilampatti, Thirumangalam, Manamadurai, Paramkudi , Aruppukottai, Vilathikulam, Kamuthi and Mudukulathur are the important urban centers in the river basin. The tank which is located northeastern side of the Kariapatti taluk is mostly plain agricultural lands with a number of irrigation tanks. The Right bank of Gundar River having slope from west to east. iii) Geology of the basin: As per Soil Atlas of District the Geological formations of basin confine to Leptinites, gneiss and charnokite. 3 INTER STATE/ INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS: The whole Gundar basin is with in Tamilnadu state. Hence the need of Interstate water dispute does not arises. 4 SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS: Detailed investigation is made for the project area is carried out for the components tanks bund, supply channel, tank bed , field channel and surplus weir, etc are as follows. Levels were taken with reference to the FTL benchmark for tank bund, supply channel, field channel and water spread area. Longitudinal and cross section were plotted in the graph using software and earthwork requirement is calculated there in. The block levels are taken in water spread area and contours plotted drawn i) Topographical survey: Catchment area is calculated using Geographical information system considering the terrain, drainage pattern and flow from plain terrain and the drawings are included. The tank components have been surveyed and the requirements on need basis are arrived and the proposals are been made as follows:ii) a)Tank bund: ‘The length of the tank bund is 2440 m long. The top width and side slopes are eroded due to the continuous wear and tear and age. Now it is proposed to bring the bund to standards, with top width 3 m and front and rear side slopes with 2:1 in line with specifications contained in IS: 12169 -1987. The maximum storage height of this water body is 2.89 m . As per clause 5,1.2.3 of Indian Standard Criteria for Design of small Embankment Dams IS: 12169 -1987 stability analysis is not required for Embankment heights up to 10 m. Here height of the Embankment is less than 10 m; hence Guidelines of Table | & Il of IS 12169 - 1987 are adhered. Whenever detailed ‘Analysis is required and taken up Earth quake force need to be accounted in line with IS 7894 — 1975. Since the Embankment of this water body is less than 10 m the Earth quake force is not taken into account for stability analysis in line with 1.S.7894-1975 provisions, Soil sample from water spread area at about 50 meters opposite to sluice no 1 ( Soil sample taken site is located in the tank TOPO sketch map ), is collected and soil tested for its suitability for bund stabilisation works and the results are furnished as detailed below are found to be suitable for encasing of bund. Mechanical analysis 33 Liquid | Plasticity | Gy4q | Maximum Dry Gravel_| Sand | sitt_| Clay | Limit | Limit Density 30% 28% | 15% | 27% | 34% | 25% | 11% 1.75 b)Command area: The total command area is irrigated by two sluice with branches on left and right and lining is proposed to avoid erosion percolation, seepage and also to reduce the water loss. Other survey: Communication survey: All the communication facilities such as roads, telephones, and transmission lines are available. Soil survey: The detailed Soil survey has been made by agriculture department, Tamilnadu and District Soil Atlas has been published. The vertical soil profile is detailed below (As per Soil Atlas of Virudhunagar District.)oY : 34 PUDUPATTI SERIES: Physiography —_ : Almost Plain lands to very gently sloping lands Discharge : Imperfectly drained Parent material :kankar bed below which cale gneiss PUDUPATTI SERIES (Ppt) cL dark grayish brown moist so YR 32 ° Yellowish brown A0vR 3/2 Dark grey clay Strong tovr ae c Dark Greyish brown clay Moderate sovR 42 Kankar Bed cr Soil Texonomy: Fine mixed isohyperthermic vertic Haplustept35° 35 iii) Geology, Geotechnical features and seismici Geology and Geo-technical features : a). The trial pit taken at site indicates Clay type of soil and the foundation are suitably designed. b). Suitability test of soil from the water spread area for encasing of the tank bund are carried out and the results are furnished. Geology of kariapatti taluk area which is in the eastern part of the district has Charnockites, granite and various groups of gneisses rock of Archaen and higher elevated lands and flat plans. ‘The tank is minor irrigation category and the existing practice of irrigation is done for the past 80 years and on enquiry it is found that there is no effect on geology or to any other aspects. iv) Seismicity: As per IS 1893 (part I) : 2002 code whole India has been divided into four zones. This project area lies on Zone II with zone factor 0.10. Hence for this small water body which has withstood several years there is no need for taking seismic effect on design calculations. v) Foundation investigations: The foundation investigation is carried out by forming trial pit near the weir and soil samples are collected, tested for properties in the near by Enginreering college. The trail pit shows, the top soil is clay and below which the soil is block cotton with Kankar bed The trial pit location is located in the tank TOPO sketch. vi) Construction material investigation: Sand, coarse aggregate, cement and steel: Location: Location of the materials Sand, Aggregate, Cement, Steel, are from the approved quarry as per schedule of rate of Virudhunagar district The quantity required for this project is readily available in the quarry as listed below: Location: Materials Source Distance [Cement Kariapatti 7 km Steel Kariapatti 7 km [Sand P.Pudupatti 18 km H.B.G. Stone Jelly 40mm size Johilpatti 23 km H.B.G. Stone Jelly 20mm size Johilpatti 23 km Rough stone for RR masonry Johilpatti 23 km Gravel [Thonugal 25km,36 ‘The samples of fine aggregate and materials were taken and tested in the nearby institute and the results shows that the materials are suitable for civil works. The results are as follows: Cement: Cement of grade 43 is used for all concrete structures. Stoel: Steel of grade Fe415 is used for reinforcement purpose. Sieve analysis of sand: : Retained on each sieve ____ | Paselng through’sach IS sieve number] Cumulative sieve size inmm | Weightin tage | retained % | —% {Limit (15 383 gm __| Percentage Passing | _- 1970) 475mm 68.45 342 3.42__| 1931.55 | 90-100 2.36 mm. 130.50 6.53 9.95 | 1801.05 | 75-100 7.18:mm 480.05 | 24.00 33.95 | 1321.00 | _ 55-90 {800 micron 476.12_| 23.81 57.76 | 844.88 | 35-59 [300 micron 718.04 | _ 35.90 93.66 | 126.84 | _8-30 [150 micron 109.99 5.50 99.16 | 16.85 0-10 [75 micron 14.85 0.74 99.90__| 2.00 A PAN : : = = = 1S requirements 1) Fineness modulus should not be less than 2.2 and not more than 3.2. 2)sand belongs to grading zone I! The above results confirmed that the fine aggregate is suitable for execution of work. Sieve analysis of coarse aggregate: : ; ; 18383:1970 1S sieve number welhae hal banana emulate | Requirements size percentage passing inmm Weight Se % _ ]Limit (18 383} Ten | Percentage | Single size | pacsing | 1970) 75 mm 5 700 100 700 2.36 mm: : 5 100 | 85-100 | 95-100 418mm 264 2.36 472 0-20 | 30-70 {600 micron 1.34 7.02 20.4 05 10-36. '300 micron 1 0.02 0.04 0 0-5) PAN = = Eats z ‘The coarse aggregate conform to IS 383:1970 specification. The above results confirmed that the coarse aggregate is suitable for execution of work.vii) Hydrological and Meteorological investigation: “The climate data are obtained from Hydrometrologically similar Kavalur watershed station and rainfall from Kariapatti rainfall station. The rainfall data is available for the period of 12 years and the climatic details for Kavalur watershed is available for seven years, ( Annexure iv) 5 HYDROLOGY: Estimation of runoff: Runoff can be estimated by various methods, such Empirical formulae and tables, Runoff Estimation based on Land Use and Treatment, Rational Method and Empirical formulae for flood peaks. Here Strange Table Showing Depth of Runoff as Percentage of Total Monsoon Rainfall and Yield of Runoff from MANUAL ON ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE OF GROUND WATER PUBLISHED BY Central Ground Water Board is used to artive the yield from runoff for the existing Average type catchment which is flat and with partly cultivated stiff gravely soils. The Kariapatti Rain fall station is representative for this project area and rainfall for the period from the year 1999 — 2010 is obtained from Kariapatti taluk office, the Rain fall data is enclosed. i) Estimation of crop water requirement: in designating water use by crops, evaporation and transpiration are combined into one tem evapo transpiration (ETo) as it is difficult to separate these two losses in cropped fields. Evapo transpiration calculated from Modified Penman method is used for crop water requirement due to its resemblance with the actual field performance. The actual Evapo transpiration for paddy in Khairf season is determined by the analysis of the concurrent record rainfall and other climatological factors from the watershed ( Annexure - vii) ‘The Crop water requirement is calculated by modified Penman method for paddy in kharif season, ETo, crop co-efficient, crop period are collected from Ground Water TN PWD and Agricultural Departments. Working table: The availabilty of water, supply from catchment and supply channel, crop water requirements, working table has been prepared for every year and an abstract showing the success and failure of irrigation are worked out and appended with this report. (Annexure via & vil ) 37