You are on page 1of 2

DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.

16450 Mini commentary


www.bjog.org

Front-line ovarian cancer maintenance therapy: PARP inhibitors


for all?

JL Berger
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of
Pittsburgh Medical Center – Magee Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Linked article: This is a mini commentary on Q Lin et al. To view this article visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.
16411

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibi- 2019;381:2403–15). Their work con- olaparib compared with placebo
tors (PARPi) have enjoyed enormous cludes that the widely accepted pro- (hazard ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.72–1.17)
recent success in the treatment of gression-free survival (PFS) benefit of veliparib compared with placebo
ovarian cancer, a deadly and difficult seen in BRCA-mutated patients and (hazard ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.6–1.09),
to treat disease. In recent years, PARPi HRD patients, extends to those respectively. No trial has reported an
have gained approvals as monotherapy patients without such favourable overall survival benefit for PARPi in
in BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, as molecular profiles, the HR-proficient front-line maintenance to date as the
maintenance treatment after platinum- patients. data are not yet mature.
sensitive recurrence and, most recently, Their work is to be commended and PARPi are not without toxicities, the
as maintenance therapy after successful shows an outcome of interest to most common of which are nausea,
front-line treatment. These benefits physicians worldwide, but it should fatigue and myelosuppression. They
have been largely limited to women be interpreted with caution. Only one also carry the rare but serious risk of
with germline or somatic BRCA muta- phase III randomised clinical trial has secondary haematological malignan-
tions or homologous-recombination shown a benefit for front-line mainte- cies, reported at 1–2% in most trials.
deficiency (HRD), with limited efficacy nance PARPi in the HR-proficient Indeed, the authors of the current
in homologous-recombination (HR) - population. PRIMA, published in late study report significantly higher G3 or
proficient patients. 2019, resulted in US Food and Drug worse adverse events in the PARPi
In this issue of BJOG, Lin et al. Administration approval of niraparib group (65.1%) compared with placebo
(BJOG 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/ in the USA in April 2020 for front- (48.5%). Treatment discontinuation
1471-0528.16411) present a meta-anal- line maintenance regardless of BRCA rates due to adverse events ranged
ysis of the four published randomised or HRD status. The PFS benefit in from 11.5 to 20.4% for PARPi com-
controlled trials evaluating PARPi as this trial, while statistically significant, pared with 2.5–6.1% for placebo in the
maintenance therapy after partial or is of arguable clinical significance. four trials included in this meta-analy-
complete response to platinum-based HR-proficient patients had a 2.7- sis. Although these adverse effects may
chemotherapy for first-line treatment month improvement in PFS (8.1 ver- be an equitable trade-off for an 11- to
of ovarian cancer, SOLO-1 (Moore sus 5.4 months) in the niraparib arm 19-month improvement in PFS that
et al. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2495– compared with placebo (hazard ratio BRCA or HRD patients can expect, it
505), PRIMA (Gonzalez-Martin et al. 0.68; 95% CI 0.49–0.94). The other is a hard sell to HR-proficient patients
N Engl J Med 2019;381:2391–402), two trials, which include HR-profi- who can expect to derive only a few
PAOLA-1 (Ray-Coquard et al. N Engl cient patients, PAOLA-1 and VELIA, additional months.
J Med 2019;381:2416–28) and failed to show a statistically signifi- Lin et al. have indeed shown a sta-
VELIA (Coleman et al. N Engl J Med cant PFS benefit in this population of tistical benefit for PARPi for all

ª 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1


Mini commentary

patients in the up-front maintenance maintenance or later in treatment, Disclosure of interests


setting. Whether this benefit is mean- alone or in combination, will be the None declared. A completed disclosure
ingful for all patients is still up for focus of much needed further of interests form is available to view
discussion, and when and how research. online as supporting information. &
PARPi are best used, as front-line

2 ª 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

You might also like