Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología e Ingeniería

Academic Unit
Academic Level Profesional

Academic Field Formación disciplinar

Course Name Diseño de Sistemas

Course Code 301309
Course Type Teórico Can be yes ☒ No ☐
enabled
Number of Credits 2

2. Description of the activity

Type of the Individu Number
☐ Collaborative ☒ 6
activity: al of weeks
Unit
Intermediate:
Unit I -
Moment of
Initial ☐ Requirenment ☒ Final ☐
evaluation:
s Engineering
and
Managemen
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Monitoring and Evaluation
activity: 175
Environment
Starting date of the
Deadline of the activity:
activity:
18 de octubre de 2017
7 de septiembre de 2017
Competence to develop:
 Understanding the needs of the organization in order to establish
the requirements for the construction of the design of an
information system.
 Identify the stakeholders involved in the construction of the
information system
 Establish processes and procedures for each stakeholder.
Topics to develop:
 Knowledge of the context of the future of software
 The collection and sorting of the dashes.
 Identification of the stakeholders
 Identification of the use cases according to the stakeholders
 Identifying the relationships of specialization of the stakeholders
 Documentation of the use cases

Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop

 Analysis of the situation.
 Conceptualization

Activities to develop
 Assess and identify the problem
 Establish and classify the dashes (processes)
 Identify those who act in each of the processes (Stakeholders)
 Documenting the use cases (procedures)

Environme  Knowledge Environment

nt for the  Collaborative Learning Environment
developm  Monitoring and Evaluation Environment
ent
Products Individual:
to deliver
by The company SysUNAD Ltda, whose organization chart
student is:
Must be carried out:
 Choose the unit of study. (One per student). The unit
should be socialized to avoid duplication among the
members of the small group.
 According to the unit chosen, investigate what are the
functions of the unit.
 Depending on the function, determine the dashes
(Processes)
 Identifying the stakeholders who run the scripts
 To establish which are the use cases (procedures) to
perform each script or process
 Design a diagram, where the relations of the use
cases

Collaborative:
 Consolidate the contributions of the members of
the small group.
 Each member must give its endorsement to the
consolidated document before uploading it to the
indicated space.
 Deliver to the monitoring and evaluation
environment in the space corresponding to STEP 2,
a PDF document containing:
o Cover page
o Introduction
o Goals
 o Solution of proposed points
o Conclusions
The name of the document is: name CW_Code
Couerse_## (Example: CW_301309_00).
The document must be delivered with APA style
http://www.apastyle.org/
Weighting: 35% of the total rating (175 pts.)

General guidelines for the collaborative work

Planning of In the development of collaborative work by
activities for students requires some key elements that lead to an
the academic exercise, responsible and effective.
development
For this to be achieved it is necessary that
of
among others with the steps outlined in the document
collaborative
entitled "Guidelines of the curriculum in the UNAD /
work
Aspects of collaborative work and accompanying
teacher" (Abbey, Sailing, Montero & Vargas, 2014, pp.
16-18):
Recognition of stakeholders: At the beginning of
each evaluative activity the student will make its
recognition as an stakeholder of the group, presenting
their strengths and exposing the channels of
communication to be effective interaction.
Assignment of roles: Each member of the group
will assume one of the roles listed, which will be
functionally during the implementation of the
collaborative work. It is suggested to rotate roles in
each of the activities, tending to a comprehensive
training of all participants in the group.
Planning of the academic activities: planning of
the activities becomes a key element for the
achievement of the task. The group will undertake a
work plan for the development of academic activity,
on the basis of the analytical reflection of the agenda
of activities, the guide and rubric assessment. Carried
out the required readings by acquiring ownership
issue.
 Staging of the principles of collaborative work: it
is important to internalize the principles of interaction,
growth and responsible action to ensure the excellent
development of their learning process and
presentation of written products that correspond to
the quality of what was requested in the course.
The active participation: it requires a proactive
participation with individual contributions relevant to
the construction of a product that account as
requested by the activity guide.

Each student will choose one of the five roles

that are specified in the check box next to this and
assume responsibly the function of this in order for
the participation in the collaborative work is relevant,
active with an assertive communication and the
construction of collaborative products requested and
Roles to within the established times.
perform by The document "General Guidelines of the
the student curriculum in the UNAD / Aspects of collaborative
in the work and accompanying teaching (abbey and others:
collaborative 2014), p. 11, establishes the following roles for the
group implementation of the collaborative work of course:
Compiler.
Reviewer.
Evaluator.
Deliveries.
Alerts.

Roles and Relate the roles that are established in the

responsibilit UNAD for collaborative work. It is important to
y for the assume with responsibility, but without leaving your
delivery of commitment as a student in front of the development
products by of the activity.
students
Compiler: Consolidate the document that is
constituted as the end product of the debate, taking
into account that has been included the contributions
of all participants and to include only the participants
involved in the process. You should inform the person
 responsible for the alerts to notify who did their
shares, which are not included in the product to be
delivered.
Reviewer: Ensure that the written to comply
with the rules of presentation of works required by the
teacher.
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains
the criteria present in the rubric. You must
communicate to the person in charge of the alerts to
report to the other members of the team in case you
have to make any adjustment on the subject.
Deliveries: Alert on the delivery times of
products and send the document in the time
stipulated, using the resources allocated for the
shipment, and indicate to other colleagues who has
made the delivery.
Alerts: Ensure that you notify the members of
the Group of developments in the work and inform the
teacher through the forum of labor and the messaging
of the course, which has been carried out in the
delivery of the document.

Use of the standard PAC, version 3 in Spanish

Translation (version 6):
APA are the style of organization and
presentation of information used in the area of social
sciences. These are published under a Manual that
Use of allows you to have the ways in which you must submit
references a scientific article. You can find the most relevant
aspects of the sixth edition of the Manual of APA, as
references, quotes, preparation and presentation of
tables and figures, headers and seriation, among
others, by going to the page http://www.apastyle.org/

Plagiarism What is plagiarism for the UNAD? plagiarism is

policy defined by the dictionary of the Real Academia as the
action of "copy the substance of the works of others,
making them as their own." Therefore plagiarism is a
 serious offense is the equivalent in the academic field,
to theft. A student who plagiarizes does not take their
education seriously, and does not respect the
intellectual work of others.
There is no plagiarism. If a student makes use
of any portion of the work of another person, and
does not document its source, is committing an act of
plagiarism. Now, it is clear that all we have with the
ideas of others at the time of submission of our own,
and that our knowledge is based on a knowledge of
the other. But when we rely on the work of others,
academic honesty requires that explicitly announce
the fact that we are using an external source, either
by appointment or by means of a paraphrase
annotated.
For the UNAD, 029 in the agreement of 13
December 2013, article 99, are regarded as offenses
against the academic order, among others, the
following: "(e)The plagiarism, that is to say, to
present as their own the whole or part of a work,
work, document, or invention made by another
person. It also implies the use of quotations or
references, or propose citad offenses where there is
no coincidence between it and the reference"; and (f)
"The play, or copy with non-profit, educational
materials or results of research products, which have
intellectual rights reserved for the University.
Academic sanctions that will face the student
are the following:
(A) In cases of academic fraud shown in the
respective evaluation or academic work, the grade will
be zero point zero (0.0) without prejudice to the
disciplinary sanction.
(B) In cases related to plagiarism in academic
work whatever its nature, the grade will be zero point
zero (0.0), without prejudice to the disciplinary
sanction.

4. Evaluation rubric
 Evaluation rubric

Activity Individual Collaborative

☐ ☒
type: Activity Activity
Unit
Intermediate:
Moment
Unit I -
of the
Initial ☐ Requirenment ☒ Final ☐
evaluati
s Engineering
on
and
Managemen
Assessed Performance levels of the individual activity
Score
Aspects High score Media score Low score
Presents Presents
No
contributi significant Contributions
contributions
ons to the contributions with little
for the
constructi to the meaningful 15
construction of
on of development content points
the work
collaborat of the activity
ive work (up to 15 (up to 7 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Clearly Features that Does not
Identifies
identifies the are not going present the
the
functions of according to the functions of the 25
functions
the unit unit of study unit points
of the
(up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0
unit
points) points) points)
Sets the Laying down in
Sets the Do not set the
scripts or the middle of the
scripts scripts
processes scripts 25
that must points
(up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0
make the
points) points) points)
unit
Identifies Identifies the Confuses the If you cannot 25
the primary and primary identify the points
stakehold secondary stakeholders stakeholders
ers stakeholders with the side
effects
 (up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Partially
Identifies No Identifies
Indicates according Identifies
to according to
the use the according to the
dashes the dashes
cases dashes
corresponding corresponding 25
according use cases corresponding points
use cases
to the use cases
scripts (up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The This is the item
diagram but does not
The diagram of
of the perform the No product
the use cases.
relationsh diagram of 25
ip relationship. points
between
(up to 25 (up to 12 (up to 0
the use
points) points) points)
cases.
Assessed Performance levels of the collaborative activity
Score
Aspect High score Media score Low score
Participat Makes a
Although there Does not
es makes substantial
is no participate in
contributi contribution to
participation, the the
ons for the
contributions construction of 12
the construction of
they lack the final points
constructi the final
deepening document
on of the product
final (Up to 12 (Up to 0
(Up to 6 points)
document points) points)
Applies the
APA in the Applies partially Not applicable
Apply entire APA APA 12
APA document points
(Up to 12 (Up to 0
(Up to 6 points)
points) points)
Structure Presents a Presents a
Document
of the document with document with 11
devoid of any
final good some errors in points
organization
document organization your organization
 complying with
the request
or spelling
contained in
the Guide
(Up to 11 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 175