Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bach
Author(s): Karl D. Braunschweig
Source: Theory and Practice , 2003, Vol. 28 (2003), pp. 79-113
Published by: Music Theory Society of New York State
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41054346?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Music Theory Society of New York State is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Theory and Practice
Karl D. Braunschweig
The treatment of dissonance in the music of J.S. Bach - whose chorales have been
a pedagogical foundation for generations of teachers and students - would seem
to be a topic well covered in the analytic literature. Yet too often we overlook spe-
cial moments in his compositions, when he greatly expands the role of dissonance
beyond both the strict ("ecclesiastical") style and the common licenses of the free,
instrumental style of thoroughbass practice. Consider the passage from the St.
Matthew Passion shown in Example 1.
In m. 17, after a brief sequence (a fourth progression supporting repetitions
of the main motive and text), the voice arrives on E for the important word "Herz"
("heart"), which Bach emphasizes harmonically with til. This in itself is not
overly remarkable; but the voice holds its tone for a total of six beats (if one con-
siders the brief departure to B and Af to belong to a lower strand of a polyphonic
melody) while the bass descends through a mostly stepwise diminution outlining
the dominant. Finally, on the third beat of m. 18, the tone of the voice part
resolves down by step to D, as the bass diminution completes a V-I resolution.
This is a greatly expanded use of dissonance, if we take as a norm (from the estab-
lished rules of counterpoint) the notion that a dissonance and its resolution will
each take one unit of the meter in which it occurs. Here the expanded dissonance
occurs as 4 (E), which Bach establishes as a consonance, transforms into a disso-
nance (over more than one bass note), and finally resolves to 3 (D). Interestingly,
it extends the metric sense of the phrase, providing two additional measures to the
overall phrase length (which is already expanded beyond its model in the opening
ritornello with the aforementioned fourth progression and text repetition).
Whether the motivation for this expanded dissonance originates in the text or in
79
ó
GO
3
2
Let us begin with Schenker and then step backwards into eighteenth-century com-
positional theory. Schenker embedded historical concepts in his reformulations of
the basic "laws" of harmony, counterpoint, and voice leading in free composition;
and we can use his thoughts as a useful bridge to eighteenth-century concepts and
practices. In particular, Schenker's codification of the underlying principles of
counterpoint is useful, for he generalizes the treatment of dissonance (also imply-
ing rhythmic norms) and speculates on its origins. Particularly relevant here is his
assertion of the common properties of the passing tone of second species and the
dissonant syncope (suspension) of fourth species, from the first volume of
Counterpoint:
If we compare the dissonant syncope with the phenomenon ... of the passing dis-
sonance, we are surprised to find that they have a common characteristic, namely,
that in both, the dissonant element is situated between two consonances! ... In both
phenomena the essential course of events ... is the same:
^ [■<
i i i
8^8
m 'l'i
** i
In this light even the dissonant syncope is fundamentally nothing but a type of
passing dissonance, a part of the general problem of dissonance altogether . . . }
Schenker quite rightly notes the basic rhythmic similarities of these differ-
ent types of dissonance; it represents his attempt to locate the origin of dissonanc
in an organic, generative sense. C.P.E. Bach made a similar assertion in hi
Versuch, when he described all dissonance to be derived from the appoggiatura.2
If we take this as our rhythmic/metric model, then we can define an expanded dis-
sonance as a rhythmic expansion of the dissonant portion of the basic figure:
We can then represent the figure found in Example 1 by the rhythmic reduction
of Example 3, which vividly illustrates the expansion from the norm Schenker
generalizes from the counterpoint tradition.
12 3 4
^^ 10 10
3 4 5 7 3
bw 5-66 6796
j l
4 5 %
til (V) I
That composers of
aware of this type of
examples typically ap
ture from norms of t
■ 0 « J-
|é»F ■ 0 « J-
[10 10]
l*«r 4 #6 67 667 98
2 5 5 5 4 3
In Example 4,
moves through
measure (as E ov
within an other
as a consonance
Expanded diss
thoroughbass, w
father's compo
A moving bass
stationary .... E
Such a relations
(retardatio).4
iiji1 m1 i1 / i
rio 5 1
L 8 10 J
(l*r r r »j I j j »j ^
9
7 667 7
|t f5
f5 646 5
6
r 10 10-1
I- 3 5 7 4-3]
(a)
i- P~ P^ TP p ii °^^ P°^"~ PP p n
$"• ' TP r i p ii ' '
r io io io io i
L3 53 3 5 73J
^: (« o I J
I
(a) with diminution
(b)
§ - r r r r
r 10 10 10 5-1
L3 5 6 3 3 5 7_65J
|4°nJ rrr
/l^rrrJlJJJjJ. I- I r r r J I -' r J -1 L I-
3TÍ~~ C
<N _
l__
^ ^ oo
w 00 .
.if*.
s y"
<3ja.
s^ SS m l__
■Hi s^ SS m
•sis
lit _ l_
Jäj K .£
tf85
Hl
•Ifs
SC g.^
- Ill °°
Iti
•gfiè
^ 'S Q - HM i ^
X
!<^ i ih i
^ IH
il
¡j j «V. . , <
Pa II 1 X' "j
PQ
JifH Ml ^''* " -::ïî(>
GO
Ì .< S
I 1
•- »
'S
O
i
I
.s <<»> - | O - -j w
O)
o <^ ~1 « - ! «
o
3 -■ «, > '(
«•8
i"
'S
I
f
I #^j| mir im
4jg^_il ~ <« -, s - -,
<* "ni 2 Il._ p
C|5Í>^ If1
-Jj Gigue
8 io io io French Suite No. 6
I V VI V
(b) Expan
Jj " Air
10 10 Orchestral Suite No. 3
ii
3 2
1 7
lfc;:J ^ j
I V
(d) Incomp
A A
1 7
^ E-Major
10 Violin Concerto, I
I V
(a)
<
p^
from
=
IV V I
II
(b)
''è from 10 10
=
(c)
¿h¿= J J J J ^ J i
¿h¿= ^^ ^ from io 10 or ?
lyr-s-. J r J
II V I
. vi n»7v
Mgd. v*
While the possibility of composing out tones at this level remains important -
indeed, crucial - for understanding depth of accomplishment in the tonal
masterworks, I am choosing to focus here on foreground passages in which the
composer has emphasized the expanded dissonance in some significant way, e.g.,
as text expression or as phrase-rhythm articulation.11
Perhaps even more crucial than Figure 1 and Example 9 for understanding
Bach's unique use of expanded dissonance is its rhythmic context, because these
bass diminutions are determined less by abstract tonal possibilities than by met-
ric/rhythmic properties. As we will see, most of the examples of expanded
dissonance follow one of two possible prototypes, which fulfill significantly dis-
tinct compositional functions; see Example 12. Both are composed-out according
to a metric prototype of four: one (A) resolving on the fourth unit of the
(hyper)measure and the other (B) resolving on the first (strong) unit of the next
(hyper)measure.12 Thus, either within a measure of four beats, or within a hyper-
measure of four measures, the arpeggiation is linked by passing tones such that
the appropriate time-span is filled.
These two rhythmic prototypes follow distinctly different procedures. (For
this reason, the series of examples that follows is arranged by rhythmic proto-
type.) In prototype A, the expanded dissonance resolves on the downbeat of the
subsequent four-beat or four-bar metric unit. Expanded dissonances of this type
appear as frequently at the measure level as at the hypermeasure level. At both
levels, reduction reveals its basis in third-species counterpoint (although with the
added organizing potential of harmonic steps): four tones counterpoint a single
tone of the cantus firmus, with decisive motion into the next measure in both
parts. By contrast, in prototype B, the expanded dissonance resolves before the
subsequent metric unit, on the final part of the four-bar segment. Most expanded
dissonances of this type appear at the hypermeasure level.13 This is as we would
expect, given the typical coordination of important voice-leading arrivals with
downbeats; to resolve on a fourth beat would contradict the tonal emphasis
expected on the following downbeat. For similar reasons, this prototype repre-
sents a significant departure from strict counterpoint into free composition and
sophisticated phrase-rhythm techniques, where the tonal and durational rhythms
do not necessarily coincide.14 Moreover, the diminution that counterpoints the
sustained dissonance typically involves more than the three tones required to fill
the time-span; usually the units are subdivided (via quicker diminutions), combin-
ing for example six bass tones with one upper- voice dissonance.
We might informally designate these two prototypes as "measure" and
"phrase," by analogy with the rhythmic norms of these two basic units: voice-
leading events in the former will usually not "resolve" until the first (strong)
"beat" of the next (hyper)measure, whereas those in the latter will "resolve"
r- - {)
co () «n - ')
/
Tt () r- ()
Tt - 3
PQ
m 0 >o () '
<
& (N Ö
I
CU
- 0 2„ o '
O
ri
i- I
-* : 2^ ;
I
<
I* " o
t w Util ffl n «
I » ~ »
è
1
(tí ' !^. ','.'
U
I m ' ::;
7
CO
<
O
'cd*
CO
£
'B
in
'S
%
t
O
CO /' - y": - ■-
'Eh
x
W
^ 1 :: '"s; ::"
« ri . s
I 1 I S
2 'o ^ o
^ p tí
•ã
s
o
¡
co
f
(D
"^
'i-i Í nj] ' ( **
I
cd
. TT
I
2 ^ II I !':! •"■
I
S ;L'|f ^ ;t .1 ---¿I i I I;-J
i - i
S? "Ti *" *" '" *" ^ " It
< 'f' W1'- i]>: 'i'i' '^i ì|f It
X ~ ~" o
w
5
5 '"3
á Õ o i ¿ ¿
j í i í a i
í * ^ 1
§
^.r- ^ ij I- «- .!= -
^- »
O
ë
e
s
8
o
o
en
hh"
'-*
en
PQ
|
Q
_c
o
s
o
O
U
fg
'S
i>
»ri
'S,
- 1i
o
'ö
o
■§
8
o
C/3
ON / r i k< ^m
S
(S
ci
i
a
•3
on
PU
i
SO
NT ::«t 55«c
w_ffl H# il
.2
é
8
8
8
I
.4441) i "' "' !;;; ^ o : ^ no çi__.
1
cd
|^ 1d J o §
°.E ^ S ° S *
-s^ ^^ ? « 2
S> §? ä
5 c o
i
r^iisi i m i m i ih1 in i- ii- imi ut
8
T3
U
I
SO ! Mal ¡n- ' ? "¡:1'ffl ^ ■? ■ **
.S
(D
I
I
00
i|" "• fi f y-rr1 :vj:(f V; :|: ^
¡
*O
Si
S
o
o
cl
1
I
I
Sì"
1O
(S
I
I
I
I
S5
ON
^-H
Jh
ihlM
Ta
1
1
ä
i- H
2
<D
£j
co
1
Pu
'Eh
I
1
o"
C
•Sä
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
I
X
i 111 I-
I
i
1
1
8
o
o
i- T
rí
S
i- I
PQ
i
§
J :: | i * *« m *■■■ ^ '"H *"*
U
g <:': l'i" M /
'S
î>
o
'ci*
UJ
es
(N
il
NOTES
5. This specific configuration also appears in treatises outside of the German tradi-
tion; see Francesco Gasparini, The Practical Harmonist at the Harpsichord [1708],
trans. Frank S. Stillings (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963), 53, Example
84.
7. Schenker, Free Composition (trans. Ernst Oster [New York: Schirmer, 1979]),
§246: ". . . produce the effect of a ninth, while it avoids the vertical form 9-8." See
also Fig. 64, 1 from Handel's D-minor Suite.
16. We must retain the quotation marks for both terms, for they clearly differ from stan-
dard definitions. In particular, the "phrase" type will often fulfill only part of a real
phrase, if we define the latter as a complete tonal motion (after Rothstein, Phrase
Rhythm).
17. See also Free Composition, Figures 111 and 114, 5c and 5d.
18. A similar passage occurs in another well-known violin composition, the chaconne
from the D-Minor Partita, in which the expanded dissonance moves towards the
dominant and is adapted to the idiomatic triple meter (see the sixtieth variation of
the four-bar segment, during the final pedal point).
20. Schenker's essay on this movement, in Der Tonwille 10, tends to focus on Bach's
setting of the chorale and its characteristic motives.
23. Schenker discusses reinterpretation in Free Composition, §298; see also Rothstein,
Phrase Rhythm, 52-56.
24. Bach cadences just as frequently on a hypermetric downbeat as on its final weak
measure; the latter usually occurs in pieces with a consistent hypermeter, but the
former also appears as an alternate way of establishing phrase rhythm. In any case,
we should not expect Bach's phrase rhythm to be as consistent as that of later com-
posers, especially in free forms such as the prelude. Nevertheless, small-scale
events (such as our four-bar expanded dissonance) offer an effective means of
defining local metric organization, particularly in pieces with no (consistent) over-
all hypermeter.
25. See Channan Willner, "Sequential Expansion and Handelian Phrase Rhythm," in
Carl Schachter and Hedi Siegel (eds.), Schenker Studies 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1999), 192-221.