Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/299615851
CITATIONS READS
8 5,778
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Luke A. Roy on 05 April 2016.
Crustacean farming has developed during the past forty years with an average
annual growth rate of 18% which is the highest for aquaculture production (FAO
2009). In 2006, aquaculture accounted for 70% of shrimp and prawns produced
worldwide, accounting for 23% of the total value from aquaculture production
(FAO 2009). The industry has also seen a growing concern for improving the
profitability and sustainability of their practices, especially as it relates to nutrition
and feed management. Modern shrimp feeds are generally nutritionally adequate
and provide essential nutrients in the proportions necessary for good performance.
However, good performance is only obtained if the feed is properly applied and
environmental conditions are favorable for good growth and survival. Shrimp feed
usually represents 40 to 70% of the variable costs of most farming operations, and
constitutes the major pollutant source for aquatic ecosystems. Improvements are
needed with the use of high-quality, water-stable feeds that contain no more nitrogen
and phosphorus than necessary. In addition appropriate feeding techniques should
be implemented to prevent both overfeeding and wasted feed. Suitable feed inputs
may improve water and soil quality, as well as reduce production costs.
Feed management comprises selection, evaluation and acceptance of the feed
at the farm, inventory management and storage, and finally delivery to the shrimp
in ponds through appropriate feeding practices. The first several steps are related
to feed quality, and the last one is critical for assuring sustainable production
and profitability. Despite the importance of feed management in aquaculture,
few scientific studies have focused on evaluating different feed management
techniques (Davis et al. 2006). Even fewer studies have specifically addressed feed
management as it related to the culture of shrimp in semi-intensive systems.
Feed selection
At the farm level, the first step in proper feed management is to select and purchase a
feed that will maximize production under the conditions in which shrimp are cultured.
Performance of shrimp to feeds can vary among farms as well as among ponds from
the same farm. It is a well known fact that all feeds are not created (or manufactured)
equal; hence selection of an appropriate feed that meets all of the dietary requirements
of the shrimp is paramount for proper feed management. The dietary requirements
of commonly cultured shrimp species such as the Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus
vannamei, are well known (D’Abramo et al. 1997), and most modern feed mills
utilize proven and tested formulations. Farmers should exercise extreme caution
when requesting alterations to existing formulations to cut costs, as saving money
on this end might translate to money lost at the end of the production season.
One factor that should be considered when selecting a feed and applying it to a
production system is that feed conversion varies with the nutrient density of the diet
and feed inputs must be adjusted accordingly. If higher concentrations of a nutrient
are in the feed, we would offer less feed. For example, a well-balanced diet containing
40% protein and fed at 75% of the ration delivers the same protein as a diet containing
30% protein offered at 100% ration (with this being near or at satiation). Although
the higher protein feed is more expensive the lower ration size used with this diet can
compensate the differences in feed cost (Patnaik and Samocha 2009). Understanding
the potential feed conversion of a good feed is critical to feed management. Using a
few assumptions from nutrient retention we can make a few quick calculations with
regards to feed conversion ratio (FCR). To produce 1 kg of shrimp using a 40% crude
protein feed we would need 1.25 kg of feed, which means an FCR equal to 1.25:1.0.
On the other hand, to produce the same 1 kg of shrimp using a 30% crude protein
feed we would need 1.67 kg of feed, which means an FCR equal to 1.67:1.0. If the
lower-protein diet meets the nutritional requirements of the animal under a given set
of conditions, increasing protein intake by increasing the daily ration does not lead
to better growth, but raises feed conversion ratio as well as the pollution loading of
the system. Similarly, if one chooses to increase the level of protein in the diet and
feed the same quantity, growth does not improve, but the feed conversion stays the
same. In this case, the efficiency of protein use decreases and nitrogen waste, a by-
product of protein metabolism, increases. Matching nutrient density of the diet with
proper feed inputs to provide just enough nutrients to maintain the desired level of
growth are very important.
Shrimp farms typically receive feed in polypropylene bags each weighing from
25 to 40 kg, with minimum batches of about 10 tons. In some locations feed is
transported in bulk via a feed truck to the farm and stored in feed bins. This is the
most cost effective and best method to move feed, albeit it is not available in many
countries. Proper storage of feed requires a storage building to avoid moisture
and excessive heat which may create ideal conditions for development of fungus,
and also reduce nutritional quality of the feed. Feed storage buildings should be
constructed of either corrugated metal sheeting (walls, roof) or have concrete walls
with a concrete floor. Feed should be stacked in pallets up to 5 to 7 layers above
the concrete floor, and then include another pallet to continue stacking feed. Stacks
must be separated by about 30 cm each to provide aeration among those pallets,
and also they must be separated from walls about 30-50 cm (Figure 2). Contact
with walls will lead to temperature differential and subsequent moisture migration
which leads to the development of fungi. It also can cause structural problems with
the building. Labeling of bags should include manufacturer, date manufactured,
mill location, proximate analysis, and list of ingredients.
Use of appropriate inventory techniques must be implemented to allow use
of older feed first. Feed inventory should be minimized to keep minimize the
holding time for feeds. The use of feeds older than three months post-manufacture
is discouraged albeit there are numerous situations where this cannot be avoided.
Large farms might choose to have feed storage sub-stations to optimize feed
Feeding practices
Pond preparation
Shrimp rely on the benthic habitat for natural foods and cover. Maintaining a
healthy low organic pond bottom is an important component of the culture system
and feed management strategies. A properly prepared pond will have enhanced
The rate of feeding offered to commercial shrimp production ponds, has been
typically calculated based on feed guideline tables (Table 1). These guidelines
Figure 3c.
Equipment for feed
distribution – Feed
trays
are based on a percentage of the pond shrimp biomass fed as dry weight. That
biomass in turn depends on the estimated number of shrimp (survival) and the mean
weight of the shrimp (growth) which must be monitored on a regular basis. Also, as
mentioned above, it is common to adjust daily feed allocations based on morning
dissolved-oxygen levels, temperature, and quantification of feed remaining on feed
As with all feed calculations one of the limitations is estimating the actual shrimp
population of the pond. In this calculation we assumed 80% survival, but on the
farm, this limit should be based on what would be a typical optimistic survival
for a given farm. If feed inputs are beyond this value we clearly are over feeding.
Typically, this value would be reduced based on both historical survivals as well
as current estimates of survival. For example, 60% survival is reasonable survival
through the end of the cycle so we would actually reduce this value based on
our estimated survival at a given point in time or by 60% for the lower end of
our production period. This would mean 42 kg/ha/day of feed would be offered,
thus creating our lower limit. By calculating these two values we can put limits
to where we feel daily inputs should be thus minimizing the desire to over feed.
When it comes to determining feed inputs, there are no absolute answers so it is
critical to look at feed inputs using a number of tools and base decisions on the
best information available.
Summary
References