Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A study of the interfacial structure between the TiN film and the iron
nitride layer in a duplex plasma surface treatment k
Woon-Seung Baek a, *, Sik-Chol Kwon a, Sang-Ro Lee a, Jong-Joo Rha a,
Kee-Seok Nam a, Jai-Young Lee b
a Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials (KIMM), Changwon, Kyungnam 641-010, South Korea
b Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Taejon 305-701, South Korea
Abstract
The so-called ‘black’ layer between PVD TiN coating and an ion nitrided surface was observed by SEM and TEM to investigate
the detailed microstructure of the interface and the delamination mechanism of the TiN film. Two distinct sublayers were observed
in the black layer. The upper sublayer was of very fine grains and the lower region of 10 times larger grains. The fine grains were
irregular and around 50 nm in size. The larger grains of the lower sublayer were similar to the compound layer underneath. A
Ti-based film was deposited on the surface of the black layer during Ti ion bombardment in a cathodic arc ion plating method
and identified as TiN and Ti phase. The TiN film deposited during Ti ion bombardment was of a very fine grain size and had a
strong preferential arrangement of (200) plane perpendicular to the surface. A lot of pores were observed along the interface
between the TiN film and the upper sublayer. It is suggested that the cracking and delamination of the TiN film be initiated at
these pores during the scratch adhesion test, which thereby decreased the adhesion strength of the TiN film. © 1999 Elsevier
Science S.A. All rights reserved.
0257-8972/99/$ – see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII: S0 2 5 7- 8 9 7 2 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 02 9 - 8
W.-S. Baek et al. / Surface and Coatings Technology 114 (1999) 94–100 95
0.75 wt.% Mn, 0.8 wt.% Cr, 0.15 wt.% Mo). The sub- was evacuated down to 5×10−6 Torr while the substrate
strate, 22 mm in diameter and 5 mm thick, was heat- was heated to 250°C with a graphite-heating element.
treated and the hardness was HRC 52. The substrate The substrate was bombarded with Ti ions which were
was ground mechanically with emery paper and then evaporated from the arc source, at a substrate bias
mechanically polished until the average surface rough- voltage of −1000 V for 30 min, which was used to
ness R of 0.02 mm was obtained. The ion nitriding modify the substrate surface and increase the adhesion
a
process was carried out in a conventional d.c. plasma of TiN film. Thereafter, the TiN film was deposited with
and then the cathodic arc ion plating method was used a bias voltage of −100 V and a pressure of
to coat TiN film. For the ion nitriding of low alloy steel, 5×10−4 Torr with nitrogen for 2 h.
an experimental condition of the total pressure, nitrogen The cross-sectional surface was polished with Al O
2 3
concentration with hydrogen and substrate temperature powder of 0.3 mm, etched with 3% nital solution for 5–
was 2.5 Torr, 70%, and 590°C respectively. The 15 20 s, rinsed with water and dried. The cross-sectional
samples were nitrided for 15 h with a bias voltage of morphology was observed by optical and scanning
−560 V and a current density of 1.44 mA cm−2. The microscopy. The microstructure of the transition layer
nitrided samples were taken out to the atmospheric
environment and reserved in the desiccator. After insert-
ing the nitrided substrate into the ion plating holder
and facing with the arc source of Ti target, the chamber
was observed in detail with TEM. The sample for TEM shown in Fig. 1(b). Two distinct sublayers were
was prepared by ‘Tripod’ polisher which was well estab- observed. The upper sublayer was of fine grains and
lished by Southbay Co. [14]. The sample was thinned darker than the lower sublayer, the grains of which were
finally using an ion miller with two guns for 20 to about 10 times larger in size. To investigate the etching
60 min depending on the thickness of the cross-sectional behavior of the black layer, the specimen was slightly
layer. The ion milling conditions were 4 keV, 0.3 mA etched for 5 s. As shown in Fig. 1(c), the chemical
per ion gun. The cross-sectional and planar view of etching took place mostly along the grain boundaries.
TEM was observed for the microstructural analysis of The black layer was observed in more detail by TEM.
grain size, defect and phase between the TiN film and Fig. 2 is the bright field image of the layer. It is clear
the nitrided layer. that the black layer consisted of the two distinct sublay-
ers as observed in the SEM micrograph [Fig. 1(b)].
Fig. 2(a) shows the fine grains of the upper sublayer of
3. Results and discussion the black layer, the size of which was around 50 nm.
Fig. 2(b) shows the coarse grains of the lower sublayer
Fig. 1(a) is an optical micrograph of the cross-section of the black layer, the size of which was around 500 nm,
chemically etched with 3% nital solution for 20 s. It around 10 times larger than those of the upper one.
shows the uppermost TiN film, the black layer 5 mm Fig. 2(c) shows a selected area diffraction pattern
thick and the iron nitride compound layer underneath. (SADP) taken from the image in Fig. 2(b), which shows
The black layer was observed in detail with SEM as the phase of the black layer was bcc a-Fe. The fine
grains of the upper sublayer are considered to have
resulted from the energetic Ti ion bombardment induc-
ing a higher nucleation density for transformation from
Fig. 5. Cross-sectional bright field TEM micrograph of TiN (a), magnified micrograph of the film near the interface between TiN and the black
layer (b). Electron diffraction pattern illustrates TiN phase (c).
the iron nitride to the ferritic a-phase. The figure shows indicated with a circle in Fig. 4(a). From the analysis of
a strain field that may come from defects such as high the electron diffraction pattern, the particle was iden-
density of dislocations or point defects inside the grains. tified as chromium carbide having a zone axis of (311)
The high etching rate of the black layer may also have of Cr C. This result demonstrated that the carbide of
3
resulted from the high strain field inside the grains [15]. the alloying element was stable during ion nitriding and
Fig. 3(a) shows the micrograph of the substrate the modification of the iron nitride by energetic Ti ions.
matrix. Fig. 3(b) shows a selected area diffraction Dingremont et al. suggested that Ar ion bombard-
pattern (SADP) taken from the image indicated A in ment destabilized the iron nitride to form the black
Fig. 3(a). The structure appeared lath-shape, that is, layer [13]. It was observed in this study that the Ti ion
typical morphology of a martensitic phase, and analysis bombardment also modified the iron nitride. After Ti
of the SADP showed that there was a (111) orientation ion bombarding treatment, TEM analysis was conducted
of the bcc a-Fe phase. From the analysis of the image to investigate how it would modify the surface. Fig. 5(a)
and the diffraction pattern, the microstructure of the is the cross-sectional TEM micrograph of TiN film
substrate matrix was identified as quenched martensite which was deposited for 2 h after Ti ion bombarding
and the size of grains was much larger than that of the treatment for 30 min; Fig. 5(b) is the magnified view of
black layer and the iron nitride. the image near the interface and Fig. 5(c) is the diffrac-
The behavior of alloying elements such as Cr and tion pattern of the film, indicated with A in the micro-
Mo during the ion nitriding process and the formation graph of Fig. 5(b), which was deposited during the Ti
of the black layer has not yet been mentioned. Fig. 4(a) ion bombardment. The main TiN film, deposited with
shows the cross-sectional bright field TEM image of the the experimental condition mentioned earlier, showed a
black layer. Chromium carbide particles were sur- columnar structure. A film was deposited during the Ti
rounded by grains of the a phase. In Fig. 4(b), micro- ion bombarding treatment which also had a columnar
beam electron diffraction was taken from the particle structure and the size of the grains was smaller than
98 W.-S. Baek et al. / Surface and Coatings Technology 114 (1999) 94–100
Fig. 8. (a) and (c) are planar SEM micrographs at the edge and center of the scratch channel, and (b) and (d ) show the Ti mapping result by EDS
of (a) and (c), respectively. Deep pores were found at the delaminated area.
black layer, which was increased with increasing time be initiated at the pores and that the soft black layer
of Ti ion bombardment [16 ]. The adhesion strength was would also play an important role in crack propagation.
closely related to the microstructure of the interface [9–
11]. Fig. 7 shows the interfacial microstructure between
TiN film and the black layer observed by TEM and the
crack observed at the edge of the scratch-channel by 4. Conclusions
SEM. The TEM micrograph shows that many pores
Low alloy steel substrates were ion nitrided and
were found along the interface, as indicated by arrows
coated with TiN film. The interface was analyzed micro-
in Fig. 7(a). The cross-sectional SEM micrograph shows
scopically in detail. The black layer formed by Ti ion
the crack lying in the interface between the TiN film
bombardment after ion nitriding consisted of two dis-
and the black layer. The crack would be initiated at the
tinct sublayers. While the upper sublayer showed fine
pores and propagated along the interface. grains which were around 50 nm in size, the lower one
Fig. 8(a) and (c) shows the planar SEM micrographs showed the size of those was around 10 times larger
taken at the edge and center of the scratch-tested surface, than those of the upper one.
and Fig. 8(b) and (d ) shows the Ti mapping result by A Ti-based film was deposited during Ti ion bom-
EDS of Fig. 8(a) and (c), respectively. The deep pores bardment and identified as TiN film which was of a fine
were found at the delaminated area of the edge and columnar grain and had a strong preferential arrange-
center of the scratch channel. Sun et al. suggested that ment of (200) plane perpendicular to the surface. The
a shearing of the black layer resulted from a decrease TiN layer was considered to result from the formation
in hardness due to the decomposition of hard iron mechanism that the incident Ti ions combine with the
nitride, causing a delamination of the TiN film [12]. nitrogen atoms dissociated from the iron nitride.
From the observation of the interface between iron The pores were observed at the upper sublayer along
nitride and TiN, it is suggested that the cracks and the interface between the TiN film and the sublayer.
delamination of the TiN film during scratch test would The delamination of the TiN film during the scratch
100 W.-S. Baek et al. / Surface and Coatings Technology 114 (1999) 94–100
test was initiated at the pores. The decrease in adhesion [4] H.-J. Spies, K. Hoeck, E. Broszeit, B. Matthes, W. Herr, Surf.
strength of the duplex coating is considered to result Coat. Technol. 60 (1993) 441.
[5] J. Kadlec, V. Hruby, M. Novak, Vacuum 41 (7–9) (1990) 2226.
from the pores as well as from the soft black layer. [6 ] H.-J. Spies, B. Larish, K. Hoeck, E. Broszeit, H.-J. Schroder,
Surf. Coat. Technol. 74/75 (1995) 178.
[7] M. Zlatanovic, T. Gredic, N. Popovic, Z. Bogdanov, Vacuum 44
(1993) 83.
Acknowledgements [8] M. Van Stappen, B. Malliet, L.M. Stals, L. De Schepper, J.R.
Roos, J.P. Celis, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 140 (1) (1991) 554.
This work was carried out with the financial support [9] Y. Anjing, L. Yufei, G. Xiang, L. Pengxing, Conference on Heat
of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST ) of Treatment and Surface Engineering, Chicago, IL, 1988, p. 43.
Korea. The authors would like to thank Dr. A. [10] J. D’Hain, C. Quaeyhaegens, G. Knuyt, L. De Schepper, L.M.
Stals, M. Van Steppen, Surf. Coat. Technol. 60 (1993) 468.
Matthews for a sincere review and comments. [11] C. Quaeyhaegens, M. Van Stappen, L.M. Stals, F. Bodart, G.
Terwagne, R. Vlaemink, Surf. Coat. Technol. 54/55 (1992) 279.
[12] Y. Sun, T. Bell, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 140 (1991) 419.
[13] N. Dingremont, A. Pianelli, E. Bergmann, M. Michel, Surf. Coat.
References Technol. 61 (1993) 18.
[14] J.P. Benedict, S.J. Klepeis, W.G. Vandygrift, R. Anderson, EMSA
[1] J. Michalski, E. Lunarska, T. Wierzchon, S. AlGhanem, Surf. Bull. 19 (2) (1989) 74.
Coat. Technol. 72 (1995) 189. [15] Metallography and Microstructures, Metals Handbook, 9th edn.,
[2] P.C. Twigg, T.F. Page, Surf. Coat. Technol. 68/69 (1994) 453. Vol. 9 , ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1985, p. 62.
[3] B. Buecken, G. Leonhardt, R. Wilberg, K. Hoeck, H.-J. Spies, [16 ] W.-S. Baek, S.-C. Kwon, S.-R. Lee, J.-J. Rha, K.-S. Nam, J.-Y.
Surf. Coat. Technol. 68/69 (1994) 244. Lee, Thin Solid Films 323 (1998) 146.