Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part A: Funds 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
TRBCX 16.42% 1.50% 18.41% 41.57% 9.28% 11.15% 0.98% 36.55%
FIGFX 16.94% (8.95%) 19.77% 22.18% (3.13%) 3.93% (3.30%) 29.76%
VWEHX 12.40% 7.13% 14.36% 4.54% 4.58% (1.40%) 11.19% 7.02%
PRSVX 25.24% (0.60%) 17.76% 32.74% 0.14% (4.70%) 28.97% 13.37%
PRDSX 33.50% 1.54% 15.69% 44.19% 6.38% 2.33% 11.31% 22.12%
S&P 500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Return 14.93% 2.06% 15.84% 32.21% 13.53% 1.34% 11.80% 24.69%
Beta Estimation relative to S&P 500 (Funds Standard Deviation/S&P Standards Deviation multiplied by the correlation):
TRBCX FIGFX VWEHX PRSVX PRDSX
Std. Dev. 14.95% 15.74% 6.04% 15.03% 15.70%
Correl. 0.83 0.86 0.57 0.80 0.90
Est. Beta 1.05 1.15 0.29 1.01 1.19
Using the S&P 500 Returns: Using the Dow Jones Returns:
TRBCX FIGFX VWEHX PRSVX PRDSX TRBCX FIGFX
Covariance 0.013292 0.0146192 0.0036813 0.0128614 0.0151502 0.009318 0.010883
Variance 0.012694 0.0126945 0.0126945 0.0126945 0.0126945 0.009282 0.009282
Beta 1.05 1.15 0.29 1.01 1.19 1.00 1.17
2018 2019 YTD Std. Dev
(4.45%) 31.29% 14.59% 11.82%
There are multiple methods for finding beta. Some of the most popular ones include: CAPM,
Covariance/Variance, Division between the standard deviations of the market and the funds
which then we multiply by the correlation, Slope formula in Excel, etc. Some of these formula's
would yield different numbers, especially CAPM. Therefore, I have used the methods which
would yield the same results. By using the Covariance/Variance, Division between the Standard
Deviations and multiplication with correlation, and Slope formula method I have obtained the
same betas in all three formulas (S&P highlighted with grey, DJI highlighted with light blue).
When CAPM was used, the beta was significantly different from other methods.
Consequentially, I have took it out from the spreadsheet (the table with T-Bill yields is still there
as a part of the assigment). Beta was slightly different between the two benchmarks. The
reason for this is in the difference between the benchmarks. DJI is price weighted, while S&P is
value-weighted. This isn't a significant difference, but the companies that comprise each index
are the reason for the minor differences. The goal of each index is to show the current state of
the market. With that goal in mind, the index is constructed. Both indexes are different in that
regard. S&P 500 catches the state of the market sligthly better in my opinion, based on the size
and the number of companies comprising it. Hence, the difference. Also, formulas for beta
include std. deviation and variance (exept CAPM). These volatility measures, which describe the
dispersion of the data from its mean, could be the cause for the slight difference in betas since
there is a difference in the means between the arays.
Returns of the 5 Funds:
50.00%
44.19%
41.57%
40.00%
33.50%
32.74%
30.00%
25.24%
22.18%
19.77%
20.00% 18.41% 17.76%
16.42%16.94% 15.69%
14.36%
12.40%
11.15%
9.28%
10.00%
7.13%
6.38%
4.54% 4.58% 3.93%
1.50% 1.54%
0.14%
0.00%
2010 2011(0.60%) 2012 2013 2014 201
(1.40%
(3.13%)
(10.00%) (8.95%)
(20.00%)
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$-
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201
$2,000
$1,000
$-
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201
36.55%
33.96% 33.79%
32.76%
29.76% 29.97%
28.97%
25.84%
22.12%
20.08%
15.79%
13.37% 13.56%
11.15% 11.19% 11.31%
% 8.93%
6.38% 7.02%
4.58% 3.93% 4.64%
2.33% 2.01%
0.98%
0.14%
2014 2015
(1.40%)
2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD
(3.13%) (3.30%) (2.96%)
(4.70%)
(6.86%)
(11.51%) (11.49%)
25.84%
TRBCX
20.08% FIGFX
15.79%
VWEHX
13.56% PRSVX
8.93%
PRDSX
4.64%
2019 YTD
TRBCX
FIGFX
VWEHX
PRSVX
PRDSX
2019 YTD
2019 YTD
Mean-Variance Efficiency Graph: Weights used in the calculation of the portfolio's return will be 30%, 10%, 15%
Another way for finding the Fund's Expected return (used this method in order to check if my calculation was right):
16.00%
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
if my calculation was right):
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00% 18.00% 20.00%
18.00% 20.00%
Calculations of Sharpe and Traynor based on Excess Returns (actuall returns minus risk-free rate): Move the pa
TRBCX Returns Risk-Free Rate Excess Returns FIGFX Returns Risk-Free Rate
2010 16.42% 3.47% 12.95% 2010 16.94% 3.47%
2011 1.50% 2.21% (0.71%) 2011 (8.95%) 2.21%
2012 18.41% 1.85% 16.56% 2012 19.77% 1.85%
2013 41.57% 2.72% 38.85% 2013 22.18% 2.72%
2014 9.28% 1.93% 7.35% 2014 (3.13%) 1.93%
2015 11.15% 1.77% 9.38% 2015 3.93% 1.77%
2016 0.98% 2.40% (1.42%) 2016 (3.30%) 2.40%
2017 36.55% 2.74% 33.81% 2017 29.76% 2.74%
2018 2.01% 2.41% (0.40%) 2018 (11.51%) 2.41%
2019 29.97% 0.70% 29.27% 2019 33.96% 0.70%
YTD 33.79% 0.94% 32.85% YTD 13.56% 0.94%
Returns Risk-Free Rate Excess Returns PRDSX Returns Risk-Free Rate Excess Returns
25.24% 3.47% 21.77% 2010 33.50% 3.47% 30.03%
(0.60%) 2.21% (2.81%) 2011 1.54% 2.21% (0.67%)
17.76% 1.85% 15.91% 2012 15.69% 1.85% 13.84%
32.74% 2.72% 30.02% 2013 44.19% 2.72% 41.47%
0.14% 1.93% (1.79%) 2014 6.38% 1.93% 4.45%
(4.70%) 1.77% (6.47%) 2015 2.33% 1.77% 0.56%
28.97% 2.40% 26.57% 2016 11.31% 2.40% 8.91%
13.37% 2.74% 10.63% 2017 22.12% 2.74% 19.38%
(11.49%) 2.41% (13.90%) 2018 (6.86%) 2.41% (9.27%)
25.84% 0.70% 25.14% 2019 32.76% 0.70% 32.06%
8.93% 0.94% 7.99% YTD 20.08% 0.94% 19.14%
Mean 12.11%
Std. Dev 12.24%
Beta 0.97
Sharpe 0.99
Traynor 0.12
Geo.Mean 13.62%