Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WEEK 2 – SESSION 2
• Introduction
• Teamwork and development
• Why you will be split into groups
• We are doing this for two reasons:
Put your team development under time pressure
Working together with people you do not know
PMAN 7001
PEOPLE, LEADERSHIP &
ORGANISATIONS, WEEK 2, MON PM 3
1
9/26/2021
GROUPS VS TEAMS 4
GROUPS VS TEAMS 5
Groups Teams
Unifying relationship Collective outcome (or common goal)
Goal can be achieved by Task requires a multi-disciplinary
individuals approach
Tasks undertaken Clear membership & distinct social
independently entity
More use of formal Mutually accountable
communication, e.g. structured Tasks undertaken interdependently
meetings More use of informal communication,
Individual performance is more e.g. informal meetings
important than team Team effectiveness more important
effectiveness than individual performance
Do your best.
Average is
10/day but aim
for 12.
WRITE a
SMART
goal.
2
9/26/2021
Task characteristics
Timeline
Clear direction (vision- if you like!)
Davies, A., Gann, D. and Douglas, T. (2009) Innovation in Mega Projects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow
Terminal 5, California Management Review, vol.51, no.2, pp. 101-125.
Davies, A., Gann, D. and Douglas, T. (2009) Innovation in Mega Projects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow
Terminal 5, California Management Review, vol.51, no.2, pp. 101-125.
3
9/26/2021
10
TYPES OF TEAMS 11
11
12
4
9/26/2021
13
14
What does
some of these
terms mean?
What happens
during these
stages of the
team
development
cycle?
time
Tuckman Model (1965) image from Winch, G. (2002) Managing Construction Projects,
Oxford: Blackwell Science
15
5
9/26/2021
WHAT
HAPPENS
DURING THE
TEAM
DEVELOPMENT
CYCLE? 16
16
17
REFERENCES 18
1. Baiden, B.K. et al. (2006) The extent of Team Integration within Construction Projects, International Journal of Project
Management, vol. (24), pp. 13–23.
2. Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, R.E. (2005) Diagnosing and Changing Organisational Culture: Based on Competing Values
Framework, John Wiley & Sons.
3. CAMERON, K.S., R. E. QUINN, R.E., DEGRAFF, J. AND A. V. THAKOR (2006) COMPETING VALUES LEADERSHIP,
NORTHAMPTON, MA: EDWARD ELGAR.
4. Constructing Excellence (2004) Effective Teamwork, London: Constructing Excellence. Available [online]:
http://constructingexcellence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Teamwork_Guide.pdf. Accessed on: 23 Sept 2019.
5. Davies, A., Gann, D. and Douglas, T. (2009) Innovation in Mega Projects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow
Terminal 5, California Management Review, vol.51, no.2, pp. 101-125.
6. French et al. (2008) Organisational Behaviour, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
7. Hersey, P. Blanchard, K. and Johnson, D. (2008) Management of Organisational Behavior, 9th edn, London: Prentice
Hall
8. Kurul, E. (2013) Influences of social capital on knowledge creation: An exploration in the UK built environment sector,
Architectural Engineering and Design Management 06/2013; DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2013.802981
9. Lester, A. (2017) Project management, planning and control : managing engineering, construction and manufacturing
projects to pmi, apm and bsi standards. Seventh edn. Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann.
10. McShane and von Glinow (2008) Organisational Behaviour, New York: McGrawHill.
11. Rempling, R., Kurul, E., Akponanabofa, H. Research Roadmap for Information Integration in Construction, International
Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction. Publication no. 417. Available [online] at:
https://site.cibworld.nl/dl/publications/pub417/Publ_417_Research_Roadmap.pdf
12. Tuckman and Jensen (1977) “Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited”, Group & Organization Studies,
December 1977, 2(4),419-427.
13. West, M. A. (2012) Effective Teamwork: Practical Lessons from Organisational Research, 3rd edition, Chichester: John
Wiley & Sons.
14. Winch, G. (2002) Managing Construction Projects, Oxford: Blackwell Science
15. Whetten and Cameron (2011) Developing Management Skills, New Jersey: Pearson.
18