Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are two aspects to mathematics – discovery and proof – and both are of
equal importance. We must discover something before we can attempt to prove
it, and we can only be certain of its truth once is has been proved. In this section
we will examine the relationship between these two key components of
mathematics more closely.
Example:
(a) Find the sum of the first
(1) 1 odd number.
1=1
1+3=4
1+3+5=9
1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16
1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 25
∑( ) ( )
Recall that the odd numbers were represented by: 2n – 1 and the even numbers
were represented by 2n.
(1) Stewart, James, et al. “Mathematical Induction.” Pre Calculus Mathematics for over
Calculus. USA: Thomson Higher Education, 2006.
Pre Calculus (Sec 9.4a) Mathematical Induction
Mathematical Induction
We are now going to take the statement and prove by mathematical induction that
it is true for all odd numbers.
1. Given: ( )
( ) ( )
Where you had an “n”, you now will add the next term of “n + 1”
2. Find the
( )( )
Wherever you had a “k”, you will now have a “k + 1” and simplify
(( ) )(( ) ) ( )( )
3. Find the
( )
( ( ) ) ( ) ( )
Pg 2 over
Pre Calculus (Sec 9.4a) Mathematical Induction
Examples:
(a) Using mathematical induction, prove that for all natural numbers n,
1 3 5 2n 1 n2
∑ ( )
( )
( )
Now prove:
( ) ( ( ) ) ( )
( )
So since the first part of the left side is this, we can substitute in:
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
Once you have both sides the same, then you HAVE TO WRITE:
Pg 3 over
Pre Calculus (Sec 9.4a) Mathematical Induction
(b) Using mathematical induction, prove that for all natural numbers n,
n n 1
1 2 3 n
2
( )
( )
( )(( ) )
( )
( )( )
( )
( ) ( )( )
( )
Since 2 of the three terms are being divided by 2, I will now put the other term over 2 but
also I have to multiply it by 2 so that I am really only multiplying it by 1
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( ) ( ) ( )( )
Now looking at the two terms on the left side of the equation, what terms are in both
fractions? (k + 1) so we will pull them to the front and what is left over?
( )[ ] ( )( )
Therefore we can conclude by mathematical induction that this formula is valid for
every
Pg 4 over
Pre Calculus (Sec 9.4a) Mathematical Induction
( )( ( ) )
( )
( )( )
( )(( ) )( ( ) )
( )
( )( )( )
( )
( )( ) ( )( )( )
( )
( )( ) ( ) ( )( )( )
( )[ ( ) ( )] ( )( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )( )
( )( )( ) ( )( )( )
Therefore we can conclude by mathematical induction that this formula is valid for
every
Pg 5 over
Pre Calculus (Sec 9.4a) Mathematical Induction
(c) Using mathematical induction, prove that for all natural numbers n,
n2 n 1
2
1 2 3 n
3 3 3 3
( )
2
( )
( )
( ) (( ) )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) [ ( )] ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) (( )( )) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Therefore we can conclude by mathematical induction that this formula is valid for
every
Pg 6 over
Pre Calculus (Sec 9.4a) Mathematical Induction
(d) Using mathematical induction, prove that for all natural numbers n,
1 21 22 2n1 2n 1
Recall:
Now:
( )
( )
( )
Therefore we can conclude by mathematical induction that this formula is valid for
every
( )
So since ( )
( )
( )
Since n = 1 worked and now any integer greater than one works, therefore we can
conclude by mathematical induction that: for any integer
Pg 7