Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This paper deals with numerical and experimental analyses of the effect of the tool edge on the cutting process. The tool forces
and temperature in the steady-state orthogonal cutting process, taking tool edge radius into consideration, are analyzed using the
finite-element method (FEM). The effects of depth of cut and tool edge radius are investigated. Also, orthogonal cutting
experiments are performed for 0.2% carbon steel with tools having three different edge radii, the tool forces being measured. The
experimental results are discussed in comparison with the results of the FEM analysis. From the study, it is confirmed that a
major cause of the ‘size effect’ is the tool edge radius and it is noted that an increase in the tool edge radius causes a change in
the temperature distribution in the tool, particularly in the position of maximum temperature. © 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All
rights reserved.
Keywords: Orthogonal cutting; Finite-element method; Tool edge radius; Size effect
0924-0136/99/$ - see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII S0924-0136(98)00230-1
46 K. Weon Kim et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 86 (1999) 45–55
Fig. 3. Temperature boundary conditions used for the cutting model. Fig. 4. Flow chart of the metal-cutting analysis program.
K. Weon Kim et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 86 (1999) 45–55 47
Table 2
Cutting conditions for the experiment
Test no. Tool edge radius (mm) Cutting velocity; rpm (m s−1) Feed rate (mm rev−1)
1 0.07
2 0.1
3 0.1 250 (2.16) 0.15
4 0.1 250 (2.16) 0.2
5 0.25
6 0.3
7 0.01 250 (2.16)
8 0.1 350 (3.02) 0.2
9 0.05 250 (2.16) 0.2
10 0.05 350 (3.02)
&
integrating as follows. taken to be adiabatic, i.e. heat losses to the surround-
x% ings by convention and radiation are assumed to be
dy%
as or y%= as dx% (9) zero. At the right-hand side and the lower boundary of
dx% 0 the workpiece, the temperature gradients normal to the
where x% and y% are the coordinates of the surface and boundary are very small and hence are taken to be
as represents the direction of the velocity vector. zero. At the left-hand boundary of the workpiece, room
By using the condition that the normal stress at every temperature is assumed.
node along the chip-tool interface is negative, the con-
tact length can be calculated. The calculation proce-
dures are as follows.
1. Assume the initial chip configuration and the chip-
tool contact length.
Table 3
Experimental apparatus
Apparatus Specification
given as follows. Four iterative cycles are performed during a cutting
hi − ho m process simulation. The first solves the viscoplastic
gi (j, h)= (11) equations for the velocity and strain rate distributions
h −ho in the chip and workpiece. At ambient temperature
where ho B − 1 represents some origin point in the conditions and with an assumed strain distribution in
h-direction and m is set to 1.2. the chip and the workpiece, the nodal velocity and
strain-rate distributions are calculated by direct itera-
tion, using the finite-element method. After each itera-
tion, the strain rate is compared to the initial value. The
iterations are continued until the initial and calculated
strain rates coincide. Once the velocities have been
determined, the temperature is calculated. It is consid-
ered that the heat generation in the chip and the
workpiece is due to plastic deformation and frictional
heating and that the chip–tool contact length defines
the thermal conduction path between the chip and the
tool. Because the elevated temperatures will signifi-
cantly alter the material and its thermal properties an
iterative solution is again required until the tempera-
tures converge. Next, the chip geometry is determined.
After the solution of the viscoplastic and temperature
equations, the computed velocities on the surface of the
chip are checked to ensure that they are parallel to the
Fig. 9. Variation in specific energy with depth of cut for a cutting free surface. If this condition is not satisfied, the coordi-
speed of 2.16 m s − 1 and a tool edge radius of 0.1 mm. nates of the chip free surface are updated, the grid is
50 K. Weon Kim et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 86 (1999) 45–55
Fig. 10. Effect of depth of cut on the contours of effective strain rate for a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1 and a tool edge radius of 0.1 mm: (a)
t1 =0.1 mm; (b) t1 = 0.2 mm.
remeshed and the velocity and temperature distribu- are given in Fig. 5. These indicate a clear dynamic
tions are computed again. The final step is to calculate strain-ageing (blue brittle) range where flow stress in-
the strain distributions. Flow lines and strain distribu- creases with increase in temperature, which is typical
tions are determined by linear interpolation. The itera- for plain-carbon steel and also show that an increase in
tions are continued until the initial and calculated the carbon content increases s1 and decrease n.
strains converge. In calculating the temperature and In calculating the temperatures, the appropriate tem-
strain distribution, it was found that the procedure perature-dependent thermal properties have been deter-
converged fairly rapidly, usually within four or five mined from the relationship
iterations. Fig. 4 shows the flow chart of the cutting
Cp°/(J kg − 1 K − 1)= 420+ 0.504T/°C (16)
process simulation program.
and
3.2. Material properties and friction force
kc/(Wm − 1 K − 1)= 54.17−0.0298T/°C (17)
The method proposed by Oxley [7] was used to For the friction force, the following equation pro-
determine the flow stress s. The flow stress of the
! "
posed by Usui and Shirakashi [8] is used
workpiece can be represented by the stress s1 and the
sn
strain-hardening index n, which define the stress – strain tf = k 1− exp − l (18)
k
curve as
where l is an experimental constant determined by the
s = s1o n (14)
tool and the workpiece, sn is the normal stress and k is
They are taken to be functions of a velocity-modified the shear stress.
! "
temperature parameter, Tmod defined by
o;
3.3. Numerical example
Tmod =T 1−n log (15)
o; 0
The machining process of 0.2% carbon steel was
where T is the temperature, o; is the uniaxial strain rate simulated for a tool having 0.1 mm tool edge. Inputs
and 6 and o; 0 are the material constants, which are 0.09 and outputs are shown in Table 1. Fig. 6 represents the
and 1 s − 1, respectively [7]. The s1 and n curves corre- initially-assumed chip geometry, the latter being ad-
sponding to plain-carbon steel of 0.2% carbon content justed iteratively during the simulation using the free
K. Weon Kim et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 86 (1999) 45–55 51
Fig. 11. Effect of depth of cut on the contours of temperature for a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1 and a tool edge radius of 0.1 mm: (a) t1 = 0.1
mm; (b) t1 =0.2 mm.
surface condition and the contact condition. From the 8, 9 and 10). Table 3 shows the experimental apparatus
machining analysis, the velocity, stress, strain-rate dis- used.
tributions in the chip and the workpiece can be pre-
dicted, along with the temperature distribution in the
chip and the tool. 5. Results and discussion
Fig. 12. Effect of depth of cut on the contours of maximum shear stress for a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1 and a tool edge radius of 0.1 mm:
(a) t1 = 0.1 mm; (b) t1 = 0.2 mm.
Figs. 10–12 show the contours of effective strain 5.2. Effect of tool edge radius
rate, temperature and maximum shear stress for a
depth of cut of 0.1 mm, compared with those for 0.2 Fig. 13 shows the measured and simulated forces for
mm. As the depth of cut increases, the maximum a speed of 2.16 m s − 1, a depth of cut of 0.2 mm and
effective strain rate decreases, but the deformation re- various tool edge radii. Although the same cutting
gion does not change substantially. The maximum tem- conditions are applied, a tool with a greater edge radius
perature increases, while distributions of the maximum exhibits greater principal and thrust forces. The simu-
shear stresses change little. lated results show good agreement with the experimen-
tal results over the entire range of the tool edge radii
tested.
Figs. 14–16 show the contours of effective strain
rate, temperature and maximum shear stress for an
edge radius of 0.01 mm, compared with those for 0.1
mm. Regarding the effective strain rate, the deforma-
tion region extends deeper and more widely in the
workpiece, but the maximum value decreases with in-
creased tool edge radius. The maximum temperature
value increases with increase in the tool edge radius and
in particular, the distribution of temperature in the tool
region changes greatly. It is considered that this results
from the increase of heat transfer along the tool edge
due to the increased size of the contact region. The
distribution of maximum shear stress shows that the
deformation region extends deeper in the workpiece
Fig. 13. Variation of principal forces and thrust forces with tool edge
with increased tool edge radius. The chip thickness for
radii for a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1 and a depth of cut of 0.2 mm. a tool edge radius of 0.1 mm is nearly equal to that for
a tool edge radius of 0.01 mm, which explains why an
K. Weon Kim et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 86 (1999) 45–55 53
Fig. 14. Effects of tool edge radius on the contours of effective strain rate for a depth of cut of 0.2 mm and a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1: (a)
r =0.01 mm; (b) r =0.1 mm.
Fig. 15. Effects of tool edge radius on the contours of temperature for a depth of cut of 0.2 mm and a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1: (a) r =0.01
mm; (b) r =0.1 mm.
increase in the tool edge radius does not change the the case of a 0.1 mm tool edge radius and 0.3 a mm
shear angle, i.e. does not contribute directly to chip depth of cut, the position of the maximum temperature
production. is shifted to the chip–tool contact region in the rake
Fig. 17 shows the distribution of temperature in tool face, because of the increase in the contact region in the
in detail. In the case of a 0.1 mm tool edge radius and rake face.
0.2 mm depth of cut, the maximum temperature is
located along the tool edge, not on the rake face. It is
reasoned that the ratio of the contact region in the tool 6. Conclusions
edge to the chip-tool contact region in the rake face
increases compared with the conventional tool edge In this paper, the mechanics of the steady-state or-
radius and cutting condition. In other words, it can be thogonal cutting process considering the tool edge ra-
said that the position of the maximum temperature dius were analyzed using the finite-element method.
depends on the ratio of the depth of cut to tool edge Orthogonal cutting experiments were performed for
radius. This phenomenon is also noted in Fig. 18. In 0.2% carbon steel with tools having three different edge
54 K. Weon Kim et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 86 (1999) 45–55
Fig. 16. Effects of tool edge radius on the contours of maximum shear stress for a depth of cut of 0.2 mm and a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1:
(a) r =0.01 mm; (b) r= 0.1 mm.
radii, the forces being measured. The following conclu- the ratio of the depth of cut to the tool edge radius is
sions can be drawn from the results of this study. comparatively small.
(1) The orthogonal cutting experiments confirm
that a major cause of the ‘size effect’ is the tool
edge radius. The simulated results also show the ‘size 7. Nomenclature
effect’ and give good agreements with the experimental
Ck penalty constant
results.
Cp specific heat
(2) As the tool edge radius increase, the principle
Fc principal force
forces and the thrust forces increase, the maximum
Ft thrust force
effective strain rate decreases, but the deformation re-
k shear stress
gion extends deeper in the workpiece. In addition, there
kc thermal conductivity
is no change in chip thickness change despite the in-
ln chip–tool contact length
crease of the tool edge radius, which shows that the
Mi shape function of infinite element for node i
increase of the total edge radius does not change the
n strain-hardening index
shear angle, i.e. it does not contribute directly to chip
Ni shape function of quadrilateral element for
production.
node i
(3) Increased tool edge radius causes change in the
Pi ith point on a flow line
temperature distribution of the tool, particularly in the
r tool edge radius
position of maximum temperature; the maximum tem-
T temperature, cutting temperature
perature occurs along the tool edge in the case where
Tint chip–tool contact average temperature
Fig. 17. Temperature distributions and location of maximum temper- Fig. 18. Temperature distributions and locations of maximum tem-
ature for a depth of cut of 0.2 mm and a cutting speed of 2.16 m s − 1: perature for a tool edge radius of 0.1 mm and a cutting speed of 2.16
(a) r= 0.1 mm; (b) r= 0.01 mm. m s − 1: (a) t1 =0.2 mm; (b) t1 =0.3.
K. Weon Kim et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 86 (1999) 45–55 55