Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A thermal field is emitted by a source in thermal equilib- special case in which there is only one nonzero term in the
rium at temperature T. The thermal field is a field about operator sum 共2兲. If there are two or more terms, the pure
which we have minimal information, as we know only the initial state becomes mixed. For the mixed thermal environ-
mean value of the energy 关1兴. Recently, Bose et al. 关2兴 ment, not only entanglement but also classical correlation of
showed that entanglement can always arise in the interaction the system and environment can make the system evolve
of a single qubit in a pure state with an arbitrarily large from the initial pure state into a mixed one. The mutual
system in any mixed state and illustrated this using a model information between the system and the environment is non-
of the interaction of a two-level atom with a thermal field. zero if the information for the total system is not the same as
Using this model, they studied the possibility of entangling a the total sum of information for each subsystem. A nonzero
qubit with a large system defined in an infinite dimensional mutual information is due to classical correlation and/or en-
Hilbert space. The entanglement between the system and the tanglement 关4兴. Thus there being nonzero mutual information
thermal field reduces the system to a mixed state when the between the system and environment is a sufficient condition
field variables are traced over. In this paper we address the for the initial pure system to have evolved into a mixed state.
question, ‘‘Is it possible for a thermal field, which is a highly The action of K̂ projects the system into a pure state of
chaotic field, to induce entanglement between qubits?’’ The K̂ ˆ K̂ † when the initial state is pure.
entanglement of an atom and a field may be a totally differ-
In the context of cavity quantum electrodynamics, the
ent problem from the entanglement of two atoms 共or qubits兲
study of the interaction with atoms has been used to look for
by their mutual interaction with a chaotic field.
the generation of entanglement between two atoms when the
We consider a quantum register composed of two two-
two atoms are present simultaneously in the cavity 关5兴 and
level atoms interacting with a single-mode thermal field,
when the two atoms interact consecutively with the cavity
whose annihilation and creation operators are denoted by â 关6兴. In these studies, the cavity is normally prepared in the
and â † . We will investigate the entanglement between the vacuum and by the superposition of processes involving de-
two atoms, which are initially separable. This simple inter- positing and not depositing one photon into the cavity, the
action model of a quantum register with its environment al- two atoms can evolve into their entangled state. However, we
lows us to understand how the memory of the environment are interested in the possibility of entanglement via a chaotic
affects the state of a quantum register. thermal field about which we have only minimum informa-
When a quantum system of two qubits prepared in ˆ s tion.
interacts with an environment represented by the density op- For simplicity, we consider identical two-level atoms 1
erator ˆ E , the system and environment evolve for a finite and 2 which are coupled to a single-mode thermal field with
the same coupling constant ␥ . The ground and excited states
time, governed by the unitary time evolution operator Û(t).
for the atom i (i⫽1,2) are, respectively, denoted by 兩 g 典 i and
The density operator for the system and environment at time
兩 e 典 i . The cavity mode is assumed to be resonant with the
t is
atomic transition frequency. Under the rotating wave ap-
ˆ 共 t 兲 ⫽Û 共 t 兲共 ˆ E 丢 ˆ s 兲 Û † 共 t 兲 . 共1兲 proximation, the Hamiltonian in the interaction picture is
level atoms with a single-mode field, using Hamiltonian 共3兲 and Taylor expansions of sine and cosine functions, we find that
冉 冊
the analytical form of the evolution operator is given in the atomic basis 兵 兩 ee 典 , 兩 eg 典 , 兩 ge 典 , 兩 gg 典 其 by
ˆ 兲 â † ⫹1
2 ␥ 2 â 共 Ĉ⫺⌰ ⫺i ␥ âŜ ⫺i ␥ âŜ ˆ 兲 â
2 ␥ 2 â 共 Ĉ⫺⌰
1 1
⫺i ␥ Ŝâ † 共 cos ⍀̂t⫹1 兲 共 cos ⍀̂t⫺1 兲 ⫺i ␥ Ŝâ
2 2
Û 共 t 兲 ⫽ 共4兲
1 1
⫺i ␥ Ŝâ † 共 cos ⍀̂t⫺1 兲 共 cos ⍀̂t⫹1 兲 ⫺i ␥ Ŝâ
2 2
ˆ 兲 â †
2 ␥ 2 â † 共 Ĉ⫺⌰ ⫺i ␥ â † Ŝ ⫺i ␥ â † Ŝ ˆ 兲 â⫹1
2 ␥ 2 â † 共 Ĉ⫺⌰
FIG. 1. Single atom-field entanglement against the interaction FIG. 2. Atom-atom entanglement induced by interaction with a
time when the pair of atoms is initially prepared in the state 兩 ee 典 for thermal field when the atoms are initially prepared in 兩 eg 典 for n̄
n̄⫽0.1 共solid兲, 1.0 共dotted兲, and 10.0 共dashed兲. ⫽0.1 共solid兲, 1.0 共dotted兲, and 10.0 共dashed兲.
in its excited state and the other in the ground state. If the
the atoms are not entangled even via the vacuum (n̄⫽0) in initial state is 兩 eg 典 , the atomic system is represented by the
this case. For their interaction with a thermal field, 冑A e A g density operator
has a lower bound 兺 n P n 兩 U 11 U 22 兩 which, extending the
nn mm
space; the density operator ˆ a⫺ f (t) is thus defined in a 2 ⫽ 兺 n P n (U 44 ) . The measure of entanglement 共9兲 is calcu-
nn 2
⫻⬁ dimensional space. An analytical form of entanglement lated and plotted in Fig. 3, which clearly shows entanglement
is not available for the system in 2⫻⬁ space, so that Bose between the two atoms for some interaction times. As we did
et al. project the atom-field state onto a 2⫻2 subspace and for the initial state 兩 ee 典 , we again first consider the case of
then compute the entanglement of formation for each of the Fock-state interaction, in order to provide insights for the
outcomes. As this projection can be done by local actions, it analysis of the more complicated case of thermal-field inter-
does not increase the entanglement and the result gives a action. For the interaction of atoms with the Fock state 兩 l 典 ,
lower bound on the entanglement of the entire atom-field one of the eigenvalues for the partial transposition of ˆ s (t) is
l l ⫺1 2 l l l l ⫺2
system. We have calculated the average of entanglements in negative when E gl ⬅ 兩 U 24 兩 ⫺ 兩 U 44 U 14 兩 ⬎0. Substitut-
this way for projected states, and this is plotted in Fig. 1 for ing the values U i j in Eq. 共4兲 into the definition of E lg , we
nm
various values of the mean photon number n̄. We see that the find
冋 冏 冏册
atom and field are always entangled for t⬎0 despite the
presence of the other atom. After a little algebra we can 1⫺c 1
E lg ⫽ l 共 1⫹c 兲 ⫺ l 共 1⫹c 兲 ⫺1 共12兲
analytically prove this as a lower bound of entanglement 2 l ⫺1 d
occurs in the subspace of 兩 e,1典 , 兩 e,0典 , 兩 g,1典 , and 兩 g,0 典 when
P 20 兩 U 21兩 (U 11
01 2
) ⬎0. The atom-field entanglement is a key to
00 2 where c⫽cos ⍀n⫺1t and d⫽(2 l ⫺1)/ 冑l ( l ⫺1). The atoms
the decoherence process. are not entangled by the vacuum interaction as E lg ⫽0 for
More interestingly, we find in Fig. 2 that atoms are en- l ⫽0. We find that the two atoms are entangled when c
tangled by a thermal field when one of the atoms is prepared ⬎c s ⬅⫺1⫹1/( l ⫹d) for any Fock state ( l ⭓1). This
040101-3
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS
关1兴 V. Buz̆ek, G. Adam, and G. Drobnỳ, Phys. Rev. A 54, 804 Rev. A 59, 2468 共1999兲; Almut Beige, William J. Munro, and
共1996兲; S. M. Barnett and P.M. Radmore, Methods in Theoret- Peter L. Knight, ibid. 62, 052102 共2000兲; S.-B. Zheng and
ical Quantum Optics 共Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997兲. G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 共2000兲.
关2兴 S. Bose, I. Fuentes-Guridi, P.L. Knight, and V. Vedral, Phys. 关6兴 S.J.D. Phoenix and S.M. Barnett, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 979 共1993兲;
Rev. Lett. 87, 050401 共2001兲. I.K. Kudryavtsev and P.L. Knight, ibid. 40, 1673 共1993兲; I.K.
关3兴 M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Kudryavtsev, A. Lambrecht, H. Moya-Cessa, and P.L. Knight,
Quantum Information 共Cambridge University Press, Cam- ibid. 40, 1605 共1993兲.
bridge, England, 2000兲. 关7兴 A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 共1996兲; M. Horodecki, P.
关4兴 J. Lee and M.S. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4236 共2000兲; J. Lee, Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 共1996兲.
M.S. Kim, Y.J. Park, and S. Lee, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 2151 共2000兲. 关8兴 C. Macchiavello and G.M. Palma, e-print quant-ph/0107052
关5兴 M.B. Plenio, S.F. Huelga, A. Beige, and P.L. Knight, Phys. 共2001兲.
040101-4