Professional Documents
Culture Documents
𝟏 1
Example 1: = 0.5; 4 = 0.4 or 1.4
𝟓
This common misconception has been observed in previous research (Sackur
Grisvard & Leonard 1985) as well as in the MES National Assessment Grade 9 in 2013
Question 3(b).
Example 1: Students say that 4.125 is greater than 4.7 because the whole number
125 is larger than 7.
1
Example 2: Order these numbers, smallest first: 21.2, 1.112, 3.1, 11.4, 0.2112
Child’s answer: 3.1, 11.2, 21.2, 1.112, 0.2112.
The child has relied on a common generalisation that, ‘the larger the number of
digits, the larger the size of the number.’
Example 2: 12 – 0.1 = 11
Students tend to misplace the decimal point when adding or subtracting two decimal
numbers.
Figure 2: Grade 7 student error in adding and subtracting two decimal numbers.
3.01
x 0.02
----------
602
Figure 3: Grade 7 student error in multiplying two
Decimal numbers
2
Examiner’s report: Cambridge O level November 2013 Paper 1 Question 2 (b)”Most
students obtained the figures 602 instead of 0.0602, but not all placed the decimal
point correctly.”
Example 2: 6.3 ÷ 0.09 = 0.7
Examiner’s report: Cambridge O level November 2010 Paper 1 Question 2 (a): “Some
students gave answers such as 0.7”
6. Decimal places
3
Recommended Teaching Strategies & Models
To avoid and address such misconceptions, these teaching strategies may be used, namely:
1. Lattice Multiplication for Decimals.
4
Figure 6: Decimal Multiplication Using Grid Paper.
Using a rectangular array and partial products can enable students’ estimation strategies
and visually show the incorrect reasoning behind a common error.
3. Posing Purposeful Tasks and Questions
The learning goal of these strings is more about relationships. These can be carried
out in class leading to group conversations such as it is not always necessary that
multiplication makes bigger and division makes smaller.
References:
1. Bell Swan and Taylor, 1981. “Nonconservation of Multiplication and Division
Involving Decimals.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 1987,
pp. 37–45. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/749535.
3. Stacey, K., & Steinle, V. (1998). Refining the classification of students’ interpretations of
decimal notation. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 6, 49-69.
5
http://mes.intnet.mu/English/Pages/Examinations/secondary/form_three/Form-III-Question-
Papers.aspx
7. Jong, C., Thomas, J.P., Fisher, M.H., Schack, E.O., Davis, M.M., & Bickett, M.E. (2017).
Decimal Dilemmas: Interpreting and Addressing Misconceptions.
8. https://emccss.everydaymathonline.com/pdf/student/algorithms_handbook/print_reso
urces/Multiplication_Algorithms/Lattice_Multiplication_with_Decimals_p_57.pdf