Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Austin,
According to Austin, Jurisprudence is considered with Positive Law i.e., Law as it is (Existing
Law). The term ‘positive law’ connotes ‘Jus positivum’ which means law laid down by a
political superior for commanding obedience from his subjects. Thus, the Law is the command of
the sovereign.
Austin divided his concepts into two:- General Jurisprudence which includes such subjects or
ends of law as are common to all systems and Particular Jurisprudence which is the science of
any actual system of law or any portion of it.
Legal History: It is the type of Jurisprudence which is concerned with a legal system in its
process of historical development.
Science of Legislation: It implies that Jurisprudence, the purpose of which is to set forth law as it
is ought to be. It deals with the ideal legal system and the purpose for which it exists.
KEETON
In his study, he concluded that Jurisprudence is nothing but the study and systematic
arrangement of the general principles of law.
ROSCOE POUND
According to him, Jurisprudence should be considered as the science of law. He emphasized on
the correctness of using the term ‘law’ in the judicial sense, which tends to denote the body of
principles recognized or enforced by public and regular tribunals in the administration of justice.
Nature of Jurisprudence
It is the mainstream of whole law, from where different laws emerges. It is not codified, it has no
limitations. It deals with the structure, uses and & functions of law and legal concept. It is
concerned with the fundamental principles of law.
The writings on jurisprudence focuses on thoughts about law rather than exposition of law itself.
Jurisprudence deals with abstract and theoretical inquiry into the important principles of law &
legal systems. It is not derived from authority neither does it have practical applications.
Significance and Need for the Study of Jurisprudence amongst others include but not
limited to the following
1. This subject has its own intrinsic interest and value because this is a subject of
serious scholarship and research; researchers in Jurisprudence contributes to the
development of society by having repercussions in the whole legal, political and
social school of thoughts. One of the tasks of this subject is to construct and
elucidate concepts serving to render the complexities of law more manageable
and more rational. It is the belief of this subject that the theory can help to
improve practice.
2. Jurisprudence also has an educational value. It helps in the logical analysis of the
legal concepts and it sharpens the logical techniques of the lawyer.
3. The study of jurisprudence helps to put law in its proper context by considering
the needs of the society and by taking note of the advances in related and relevant
disciplines.
4. Jurisprudence can teach the people to look if not forward, at least sideways and
around them and realize that answers to a new legal problem must be found by a
consideration of present social needs and not in the wisdom of the past.
5. Jurisprudence is the eye of law and the grammar of law because it throws light on
basic ideas and fundamental principles of law. Therefore, by understanding the
nature of law, its concepts and distinctions, a lawyer can find out the actual rule of
law. It also helps in knowing the language, grammar, the basis of treatment and
assumptions upon which the subject rests. Therefore, some logical training is
necessary for a lawyer which he can find from the study of Jurisprudence.
6. Jurisprudence helps the judges and lawyers in ascertaining the true meaning of the
laws passed by the legislators by providing the rules of interpretation. Therefore,
the study of jurisprudence should not be confined to the study of positive laws but
also must include normative study i.e. that study should deal with the
improvement of law in the context of prevailing socio- economic and political
philosophies of time, place and circumstances.
7. Professor Dias said that ‘the study of jurisprudence is an opportunity for the
lawyer to bring theory and life into focus, for it concerns human thought in
relation to social existence’.
Analytical Jurisprudence:
Analytical jurisprudence was propounded by Jeremy Bentham and later taken on by John Austin.
This branch of jurisprudence analysis basic principles of law. It is not concerned with the last
stages of its evolution. It is also not concerned with its goodness or badness. The purpose is to
analyze the present position.
Historical Jurisprudence
It is the scientific study of evolution and the development of the principle of law. Historical
jurisprudence is the history of the legal principles and conceptions of the legal system. The
historical jurists include Savigny, Montesquieu, Rousseau, etc.
It deals with law as it appears in its various forms at its several stages of
development.
This type deals to show the conditions that gave rise to the legal conceptions, to
trace their spread and development, and to point out those conditions and
influences which modifying them in the varying course of their existence.
Philosophical jurisprudence: Philosophical jurisprudence deals itself with the philosophy of the
law. It is a discussion about the nature of the law and why it is important to modern society.
Legal philosophical jurisprudence is a popular branch of study and often it is used for legal
reform.