Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Criminal Complaint Against Michael Grillo

    Uploaded by

    Trevor Ballantyne
    4K views2 pages
    Criminal complaint against Michael Grillo

    Original Title

    Criminal Complaint against Michael Grillo

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Criminal complaint against Michael Grillo

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4K views2 pages

    Criminal Complaint Against Michael Grillo

    Uploaded by

    Trevor Ballantyne
    Criminal complaint against Michael Grillo

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2
    on New Londion Police Department ce owl TSR — ORR = Ta TT TOR Gasp Gpplication For Arrest Warrant hen} New London |avcrnmtar 10 PPR Judge of te Superior Court ‘he urdersgned hereby apo for a warart or Tomiie: 1 shart Sea FEU aes tne boven acu on tbs at ail alae Sao Aridavit ‘The undersigned aan. being duly sworn, depotes an 1. That the Affiant, Detective William Per a sie employed nce September of 985, ™ Pero regular member ofthe New London Polie Department, having been So urrently holding the rank of Detective. Affiant Pero i currently assigned to the New London Police Department ser aa Weoae th Irvestgations inte enenatments Detective sine February 2002, where his primary duties are those of conducting Paecengations into criminal violations within the City of New London, CT. Furthermore, Affiant Pero has attended ing courses relating to laws, arrest, and search and seizure. That Affiant Pero has conducted and assisted in Investigations where his training and experience has, renee nied ig and experience has been employed and resulted in the arrest and convictions of those 2. That on July 18, 2039, Sam Kumar the owner of United Check Cashing located at 256 South Frontage Rd. New London, CT filed bad checks/larceny complaint with Detective Per. The incident tok pace at United Check Cashing ‘on May 24 and 25, 2019. The complainant stated that on the aforementioned dates two employees of the M&M Group LLC came into the United Check cashing store and cashed thelr business pay checks. The checks were drawn on an account at Coreplus Federal Credit Union with the business name listed as The M&M Group LLC 20 Jordan Drive Norwich, CT. Mr. Kumar reported that Kyasha Goode cashed her check #1468 in the amount of $1,187.14. The following, day Felipe Ecchavarria her coworker also came into the store and cashed check#1460 in the amount of $774.35, which later resulted in a loss to the store of $1,961.49, plus fees. Mr. Kumar stated that he spoke with Michael Grillo the company owner, but he was unable to get any satisfaction. Mr. Grillo informed Mr. Kumar that Coreplus Federal Credit Union was informing him that payment was made for the checks in questions so Mr. Grillo felt that he was not liable. ‘Mr. Kumar stated that he called Mr. Grillo twice to discuss the issue and both times Grillo said he would call him back. to discuss the matter but never did. Detective Pero did conduct a search for The M&M Group LLC via the State of Connecticut Business registry. The business inquiry listed Michael Grillo 20 Jordan Dr Norwich, CT and Bryan Balczun as the principal members. The agent summary listed Michael Grillo with the same address. 3. Mr. Kumar stated that the first time he attempted to deposit the aforementioned checks into his account they were returned stamped non-sufficient funds. The second time he attempted to deposit them he got the reply that the ‘account was frozen/blocked. Mr. Kumar did send a registered letter to Michael Grillo the owner of the M&M group LLC requesting payment. Mr. Kumar stated that Grillo has not made restitution. That after receiving the complaint Detective Pero initially called and spoke with Mr. Grillo about the problems with the checks cashed by his employees. Mr. Grillo explained that his bank is reporting that the payment forthe checks was completed out of his account. (isis page 1 ofa 2page Aco) 1D) =e ena a isa L ae etre reo ORR) Se a Wt PR) Ste Finding “The foregoing Application for an arrest warrant, and affidavit(s) attached to said Application, having been submitted to and considered by the undersigned, the undersigned finds ftom said afidaits) that teres probable cause to beleve that 4n offense has been committed and that the accused committed it and, therefore, that probable cause exists for the issuance of a warrant for the arrest of the above-named accused. Seite il pare aga i STATE OF CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR CourT eno. gov f Rs Poe eT pa = S&B TRIO [acorn it- continue ee NowLondon | aeeninsct 10 i [fa pero was then able to email Myo Per ail Mr. Grillo the bank rejection oi his cheek n question. Mr. Gro ty ne On forms that were received by United Check cashing

    You might also like