Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D’Vore Brittingham
Capstone Reflection
Global Campus (UMGC) has shifted my thinking as an educator. Starting this program I
considered myself to be a seasoned teacher with my instructional techniques down pat. However,
from the first course I took and the closing of my Capstone Project the words “there’s always
room for growth” never rang more true. This program has pushed me to become a better teacher
and leverage technology in a way that benefits not only students but teachers. There were a lot of
eye-opening moments, assignments, and knowledge that I plan to wholeheartedly transfer into
my everyday teaching setting and beyond. As I bring the final piece of my program path to a
close, I know that who I am as an instructional technology leader is not yet set in stone. If there’s
anything I’ve learned it’s that technology as well as education is ever evolving and changing, and
While I reflect I plan to show you what I’ve accomplished throughout this program, how
I’ve mastered and continue to work with the ISTE Standards for Coaches, and how concepts in
education. Not only am I a teacher but I am also a special education teacher. A lot of my job is
ensuring that education is accessible to all learners. The Instructional Technology program has
shown me how to leverage technology to achieve this goal. I plan to use the new skills and
knowledge I’ve gained in order to push the teaching and learning inside my classroom.
UMGC Conceptual Framework has been aimed at teaching me how to provide this to my
students. There is an overarching goal of “Teaching and Leading Beyond Boundaries” within
this frame. Simply put this means that we figure out how to provide high-quality instruction and
education to all learners despite social or economic backgrounds. The objectives of the
framework are:
6. Instructional Leadership
Each objective of the framework has lent itself in preparing me for a life as a technology
integration leader in schools. The following are the three objectives that I feel have really pushed
me in my craft: Teaching for Learning, Technology Integration and Digital Citizenship, and
The objective Teaching for Learning focuses not only on my content knowledge but also
my knowledge of my students and their varying levels of ability. “While educators must deeply
understand their own disciplinary field and the way in which the field is connected with other
related subjects, they must also be able to integrate that disciplinary knowledge with a deep
understanding of the learner and his/her life in order to design meaningful instruction”
EDTC 670 TEACHING AND LEADING BEYOND BOUNDARIES PROJECT
(University of Maryland Global Campus, 2013, p. 13). This objective puts me in the mindset of
“addressing the needs of the whole child.” Often as a special education teacher I am tasked with
meeting my students where they’re at academically and working from there. This objective
pushed me to continuously promote a high level of learning for my students while also
addressing their individual needs. Inside of my classroom, I now implement a multitude of web
2.0 platforms, assistive technology, and differentiated instruction when working with my
students.
select the right technology to integrate into my classroom and how well I prepare my students to
my learning and teaching has been done through a global pandemic, which forced the world to
go digital. Because of this crisis it was more important than ever that I taught my students about
global citizenship. Students spent an extraordinary amount of time on the internet and on
computers for learning. As an educator I spent my time ensuring that I was selecting the right
technology programs for our classroom and also making sure that I integrated each program at
the correct time and gave students choice in their online learning. I also spent time ensuring that
students knew how to conduct themselves digitally with their peers locally and globally.
Teaching students online decorum helped prepare them for the real-world complex situations that
The objective Creativity, Innovativeness, and Adaptability has also been prominent in me
learning to provide equitable instruction to my students. Working with 21st century learners, it is
EDTC 670 TEACHING AND LEADING BEYOND BOUNDARIES PROJECT
important to capitalize on using technology and digital tools to leverage learning for students. I
have found that technology integration inside of the classroom has allowed me to give more
student choice in the learning and has also created independent learners. It is also important to
foster a learning environment where students are not afraid to fail and know that “mistakes” are
just a piece of the learning process. This has been my biggest push for my students and my
growth. Working with middle school aged kids, they are all virtually afraid to fail or take risks in
front of each other. This has made me push my creativity inside of the classroom. I’ve looked for
ways to show that “failing” is not always a negative thing and have turned these into teachable
work with the International Society of Technology in Education (ISTE) standards for coaches. In
this next portion I will address my proficiency with each standard and it’s various indicators with
clear evidence. The assignments that I have completed to aid me in my development will also be
provided for proof. I will also elaborate on the ISTE standards that I believe I still need further
growth with, and my plan for meeting the standards needs in the future.
Standard #1: Change Agent – “Coaches inspire educators and leaders to use technology to
create equitable and ongoing access to high-quality learning”.
Standard 1 of the ISTE Standards for Coaches focuses on coaches being able to “inspire
educators and leaders to use technology to create equitable and ongoing access to high-quality
learning.” When looking at this standard I would consider myself to be proficient. This standard
has the indicator of “facilitating equitable use of digital learning tools and content that meet the
EDTC 670 TEACHING AND LEADING BEYOND BOUNDARIES PROJECT
needs of each learner. ( International Society for Technology in Education, 2021)” As my time as
a special education teacher I’ve been able to work with multiple general education teachers and
Through my time at UMGC I’ve exhibited proficiency with this skill with the development
of my School Technology Plan completed in EDTC 630, and my District Technology Training
Plan that I completed in EDTC 640. The School Technology Plan was created with my
classmates from the course and demonstrated our expertise with indicator 4.1.e which is
“connecting leaders, educators, instructional support, technical support, domain experts and
solution providers to maximize the potential of technology for learning” ( International Society
for Technology in Education, 2021). My District Technology Training Plan allowed me to access
the school and the district's needs as a whole, in order to put in a plan that supported teachers and
standard I would consider myself to be proficient. This standard has the indicator 4.2.a “pursuing
professional learning that deepens expertise in the ISTE Standards in order to serve as a model
for educators and leaders” ( International Society for Technology in Education, 2021). It is
important for educators and leaders to model what is expected. I believe that I am proficient in
this standard.
During my time at UMGC I’ve modeled what is expected to improve practices by the
completion of the Global Lesson Plan project in EDTC 645. I’ve also spent an extensive amount
of time interacting with indicator 4.2b., “actively participate in professional learning networks to
enhance coaching practice and keep current with emerging technology and innovations in
pedagogy and the learning sciences” ( International Society for Technology in Education, 2021).
I’ve participated in a Professional Learning Network (PLN) in the EDTC 600 course. In my role
as an educator I am always modeling what is expected for my students inside of the classroom as
well. Over the course of this program I’ve been committed to expanding my PLN. A PLN is
described as "a network of people and resources that support ongoing learning" (Morris, 2018).
As an educator I am constantly looking for resources that help improve my practice. I’ve
attended multiple professional developments, web seminars, and continuously read education
Standard 3 of the ISTE Standards for Coaches focuses on coaches being able to “establish
productive relationships with educators in order to improve instructional practice and learning
outcomes.” This standard has the indicator 4.3.b “partner with educators to identify digital
learning content that is culturally relevant, developmentally appropriate and aligned to content
standards” ( International Society for Technology in Education, 2021). When looking at this
standard I would consider myself to be proficient. As a special education teacher I have worked
alongside general education teachers and administration in order to find ways to best service
children. As a budding technology specialist, in my school I’ve also been tasked with finding
new digital tools (hardware, software, website, etc.) that promote and facilitate learning as well.
During my time at UMGC I’ve been able to research extensively new assistive technology
that would benefit students as well. This aligns with indicator 4.3c., “partner with educators to
evaluate the efficacy of digital learning content and tools to inform procurement decisions and
adoption.” I’ve also demonstrated my ability to do this in the EDTC 625 course with the
completed in EDTC 605 also gave me the benefit to determine the efficacy of digital learning
tools as well.
Standard #4: Learning Designer – “Coaches model and support educators to design learning
experiences and environments to meet the needs and interests of all students”.
Standard 4 of the ISTE Standards for Coaches focuses on coaches being able to “model and
support educators to design learning experiences and environments to meet the needs and
interests of all students”. I believe my time at UMGC has now made me proficient with this
standard as well. As a special education teacher I spend a lot of time planning lessons that will
provide my students with equitable access, and also figuring out things that will engage all
learning modalities. My experience in this program and as an educator has greatly assisted me in
this initiative. This standard has the indicator 4.4.a “collaborate with educators to develop
authentic, active learning experiences that foster student agency, deepen content mastery and
Inside of the classroom my co-teacher and I have been using a multitude of platforms
digital and classroom based to engage students in learning. These things range from project
EDTC 670 TEACHING AND LEADING BEYOND BOUNDARIES PROJECT
based learning assignments, station learning, and independent web based learning. My
Classroom Technology Plan from EDTC 630, also helped me hone in on these skills. It gave me
a continued practice of creating student centered lesson plans for the benefit of all learners.
Standard #5: Professional Learning Facilitator – “Coaches plan, provide and evaluate the
impact of professional learning for educators and leaders to use technology to advance teaching
and learning”.
Standard 5 of the ISTE Standards for Coaches focuses on coaches being able to “plan,
provide and evaluate the impact of professional learning for educators and leaders to use
technology to advance teaching and learning”. I believe I am still developing with this standard.
While I have had opportunities to work with and showcase new and upcoming technology to
facilitate learning. I have not yet had the opportunity in a real capacity to coach and provide
professional developments for teachers. This standard has the indicator 4.5.c “evaluate the
impact of professional learning and continually make improvements in order to meet the
schoolwide vision for using technology for high-impact teaching and learning”.
EDTC 670 TEACHING AND LEADING BEYOND BOUNDARIES PROJECT
I have practiced with this indicator during the EDTC 640 course. I created an online
professional development workshop geared towards ensuring the comfortability and ability of
teachers to effectively plan, create, and deliver Common Core aligned engaging and meaningful
lesson plans. While I had the opportunity to practice making meaning and impactful professional
developments for teachers, I still would like to continue to grow with this standard.
Standard #6: Data-Driven Decision-Maker –“ Coaches model and support the use of
qualitative and quantitative data to inform their own instruction and professional learning”.
Standard 6 of the ISTE Standards for Coaches focuses on coaches being able to “model
and support the use of qualitative and quantitative data to inform their own instruction and
professional learning”. I believe that I am proficient with this standard. As a special educator I
am always using data to drive my instruction. Data is also the foundation of my IEP
implementation and any modifications that take place for students. I also use my schools
microdata from assessments like: PARCC, NWEA Map, i-Ready, and Anet to show me what
Common Core standards and skills I should focus on inside of the classroom. These things then
drive my practice with daily entrance and exit tickets, guided practice, independent practice, and
homework.
EDTC 670 TEACHING AND LEADING BEYOND BOUNDARIES PROJECT
This standard has the indicator 4.6.b “Support educators to interpret qualitative and
quantitative data to inform their decisions and support individual student learning”. I have
practiced with this indicator during the EDTC 615 course with creating a Data Action Plan
Model. While my SMART goal for this model was not met, it gave me great insight with
reflection of the data to drive my classroom instruction. It also allowed me the opportunity to
know what it feels like when a plan doesn’t succeed and you must start over again. Data
Standard #7: Digital Citizen Advocate – “Coaches model digital citizenship and support
educators and students in recognizing the responsibilities and opportunities inherent in living in a
digital world”.
Standard 7 of the ISTE Standards for Coaches focuses on coaches being able to “model
digital citizenship and support educators and students in recognizing the responsibilities and
opportunities inherent in living in a digital world”. I believe that I am proficient with this
standard. During my time in the EDTC 630 course I did an extensive amount of work with
Acceptable Use Policies (AUP). This work helped me examine the need of digital awareness
teaching not only with students but also educators. From my research in this course it was
EDTC 670 TEACHING AND LEADING BEYOND BOUNDARIES PROJECT
apparent that while all digital platforms have some form of an AUP, almost no one ever reads
them. This lack of reading can in some instances be detrimental for students and educators
This standard has the indicator 4.7.d “empower educators, leaders and students to make
informed decisions to protect their personal data and curate the digital profile they intend to
reflect”. Inside of my classroom I have tried to model and promote the management of personal
data and a digital identity that protects myself and my students. Making students aware of safe,
legal, and ethical online practices; has helped me to establish a learning culture inside and
outside of the classroom that fosters digital literacy and media fluency.
Conclusion
Looking back on my time here at UMGC in the Instructional Technology program, I can’t
help but feel accomplished. During my degree program, I stated that "in this program I hope to
gain ways to be an effective leader amongst my colleagues, use technology to inspire change
inside and outside of the classroom, foster and build meaningful connections with the staff, and
clear communication skills." I can now say that I’ve met this goal and I am walking away with
the knowledge of how to inspire change inside and outside of the classroom. While I am not yet
figuring out ways to help with closing the digital divide and bring equality to education for all
References