Amg Ppap Workbook

Revision History
Description of Change Approval Date

Changed the precision of the numeric entries for the '9
Dimensional Test Results' tab to allow for up to 3 T.Milbrath 4/1/2019
decimal points of resolution
Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

1AF0003 Revision Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
PPAP packages are expected to be received by AM General by the agreement

date with the AM General Supplier Quality Engineer. If for any reason you
cannot meet this date, contact your AM General Supplier Quality Engineer or
Supply Management Buyer for resolution.
The Default PPAP is Level 3, unless otherwise element specified by the AM General Supplier Quality Representative.
PPAP Submissions are required under the following circumstances:
1) Initial submission
2) Engineering Change(s)
3) Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional
4) Correction of Discrepancy
5) Change to Optional Construction or Material
6) Sub-Supplier or Material Source Change
7) Change in Part Processing
8) Parts produced at Additional Location
9) Change of ownership
10) Changes that impact Performance test methods or results
11) Production rate /cycle time changes
12) AM General or Supplier Production Downtime > 1 year
13) For all current and future supplied product, internal PPAP's shall be conducted annually and
made available upon request
14) Other, please specify
Please reference the AM General Supplier Quality Manual for additional information. This can be procured from the AM
General Homepage under the Supply Chain Management, Military Programs section.

1AF0003 When to PPAP Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
Information
Manufacturer Information
Supplier Name
Supplier Code
Street Address
City
State
Zip
Country
Authorized Person
Name
Title
Phone Number
Fax Number
Email
Material Information
Part Name
Part Number
Revision
Drawing Number
Drawing Change Level
Dated (MM/DD/YYYY)
Purchase Order No.
Tool Order No.
Scheduling Agreement
Checking Aid / Test Equip. No.
Change Level / Dated (MM/DD/YYYY)
Weight (kg)
Additional Engineering Changes
Dated (MM/DD/YYYY)
Customer Information
Customer Name / Division
Buyer
Application
Supplier Quality Engineer
1AF0003 Information Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com)
Feasibility Form
Supplier Name
Supplier Code The drawings and/or specifications and/or sample parts and/or on-site functional review and/or lessons learned provided, have been used as a basis for
analyzing the ability to meet all specified requirements. Our product quality planning team has considered the 15 following questions. All "red"
Customer Contact answers are supported with comments identifying our concerns and/or proposed changes to enable our organization to meet specified requirements,
Application unless otherwise noted. Additional questions may be added per Program and/or Part requirements.
Last Updated
1 Is product adequately defined (application, requirements, etc.) to enable feasibility evaluation? 11 Is SPC presently used on similar products? Comments are not required.
2 Can Engineering Performance Specifications be met as written? 12 Where SPC is used on similar products, are the processes in control and stable?
3 Can product be manufactured to tolerances specified on drawing? 13 Where SPC is used on similar products, does process capability meet customer requirements?
4 Can product be manufactured with process capability that meet requirements? 14 Are Supplier Quality Manual and PPAP (AMG_PPAP_Workbook- 0b.SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS tab) understood?
5 Is there adequate capacity to produce product? 15 Are Packaging requirements understood?
6 Does the design allow the use of efficient material handling techniques?
7 Does the product require new or unusual materials? If yes, comments required.
8 Do we have current copies of all applicable specifications and have they been reviewed?
9 Does the manufacturing process require any unusual manufacturing methods? If yes, comments required.
10 Is statistical process control (SPC) required on product? Comments are not required.
Parts Reviewed and Applied Question Answers: Indicate Y, N, or N/A - Inculde Comments for All Red Shaded Answers
Part Number Revision Part Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Comments
1 PART NUMBER REV PART NAME
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
-1
Conclusion: Feasible - Product can be produced as specified with no revisions.

Supplier Functional Position Supplier Team Member Date Customer Functional Position AMG Team Member Date
Sales / Program Management Y Buyer
Engineering N Supplier Quality Engineer
Quality N/A Engineering
Plant Manager

1AF0003 0a. Feasibility Form Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
PPAP Submission Requirements
ALL PPAP SUBMISSIONS must be submitted electronically to the following email address: submission.data@amgeneral.com
Supplier Name Purchase Order No.
Supplier Code Reason for Request
Part Name Application

Part Number Date Issued
Revision Submission Due Date
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN WRITING BY AM GENERAL SUPPLIER QUALITY REPRESENTATIVE (SQE) :

Level 3 - Default submission.
Levels 1, 2, 4, and 5 used only when specified in writing by AMG SQE.
S = Supplier must submit items to AM General for approval.
R= Documents are not required to be submitted, objective evidence must be made available anytime upon request by AMG.
N/A = Not Applicable.
S/R/O = Submit or Retain or Omit. Level 4 - Element omissions occur only as specified in writing by the AMG SQE Level 4. (Copy of
original document (e-mail or hand written) specifying Levels 1, 2, 4, or 5 must be submitted with Warrant) For all and future supplied
product, internal PPAP's shall be conducted annually and made available upon request.
Submission Level
PPAP Submission Requirements and Detail Description 1 2 3 4 5
0a) Supplier Team Feasibility Commitment - N/A S S S S
0b) PPAP Submissions Requirements as specified by SQE. (This document, e-mail, hand written) N/A S S S S
0c) Part Submission Warrant (PSW) S S S S S
0d) Interim Part Submission Warrant (PSW) - if applicable N/A S S S S
1) Design Records (Bubble Print all features, notes, and specifications) R S S S/R R
2) Engineering or Supplier Change Request (AMG Process Change Notification) - if applicable R S S S/R R
3) Customer Engineering Approval - if applicable. R R S S/R R
4) Design Failure Modes Effects Analysis (DFMEA) - supplier design responsible R R S S/R/O R
5) Process Flow Diagram (PFD) R R S S/R R
6) Process Failure Modes Effects Analysis (PFMEA) R R S S/R R
7) Process Control Plan R R S S/R R
8) Measurement System Analysis (MSA) - Measurement equipment must be supported with MSA. R R S S/R R
9) Dimensional Results - 6 Piece full layout required. R S S S/R R
10) Material/ Performance Test Results. PRINT NOTES: Material, Surface Finish, Labeling, Performance,
Paint Process, Coating, Welding Documentation IE WPS/PQRs/Welder Certs, Plating, Heat Treat, etc. R S S S/R R
And all Certificates of Conformance Related to Special Processes.
11) Initial Process Studies - Must be provided for all print, specification, AMG SQE deemed critical
characteristics, and internal supplier deemed critical characteristics. (Additional process studies may be R R S S/R R
requested based upon 6 pc. dimensional layout results standard deviation and distribution.)
12) Qualified Laboratory Documentation. (Internal and or 3rd Party required for all tests conducted.) R R S S/R R
13) Appearance Approval Report (AAR) - if applicable S R S S/R/O R
14) PPAP Sample Product- PTR Production Trial Run parts/ upon request prior to production order R S S S/R R
15) Master Sample (Submit/Retain Photo Documentation of PPAP layout part(s) Retain Part. R R R S/R R
16) Checking Aids (Fixture, gage, template, etc) - if applicable R R S S/R/O R
17) Records of Compliance with Customer Specific Requirements. If applicable (CQI, Capacity, Etc.) R R S S/R R
18) Tooling Photo Documentation - if applicable R R S S/R R
Bulk Materials Refer to AIAG PPAP 4th ed. Table 4.1 and Appendix F
1AF0003 0b. Submission Requirements Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Page 5 of 38

Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
PPAP Submission Requirements
Additional Submission Instructions below:
PPAP Submission Package is to have each Element Sub-Divided by Element cover sheet. For areas that are not applicable, include
a sheet for the Element with N/A. Example: For non-design responsible suppliers, the element sub-divider would indicate:
"DFMEA N/A" **NOTE-Use ALT+Enter to go to a new line in the box below. Just using the Enter key will exit the box.**
1AF0003 0b. Submission Requirements Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Page 6 of 38

Part Submission Warrant
Part Name Part Number Revision

Drawing Number Eng. Dwg. Change Level Dated
Purchase Order No. Tool Order No. Dated
Scheduling Agreement
Checking Aid / Test Equip. No. Change Level / Dated Weight (kg)
Additional Engineering Changes Dated
Supplier Manufacturing Information Customer Information

Supplier Name Supplier Code Customer Name / Division
Street Address Buyer
City State Zip Country Application
Does this part contain any restricted or reportable substances? Yes No N/A
Are plastic parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? Yes No N/A
REASON FOR SUBMISSION (check at least one)

Initial Submission Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change(s) Sub-Supplier or Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, Additional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts Produced at Additional Location
Tooling Inactive > than 1 year Other- please specify below
Certificate of Conformance: LOT # QTY
Submission Level (check one)

Level 1 - Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval Report) submitted to customer.
Level 2 - Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 3 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 4 - Warrant and other requirements as defined by customer. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at supplier's manufacturing location.
Submission Results
The Results For: dimensional measurements material and functional tests appearance criteria statistical process package
These results meet all design requirements: Yes No (if No- Explanation Required)
Declaration
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts which were made by a process that meets all AM General specific requirements,
drawings, specifications and meet all PPAP 4th Edition Requirements. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review.
I further affirm these samples are made from specified materials on regular production tooling with no operations other than the regular production process produced
at a rate of pcs/hr. I have clearly written any exceptions from this declaration below.
Explanation / Comments
List Molds / Cavities / Production Processes:
Organization Authorized Signature Date
Print Name Phone No. Fax
Title Email
For Customer Use Only

PPAP Warrant Disposition: Approved Rejected
Interim Approval Comment:
Supplier Quality Engineer Signature
Print Name
1AF0003 0c. PSW Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Interim Recovery Worksheet
Supplier Name Part Name

Supplier Code Part Number
Resubmission Date Revision Dated
Interim Expiration Date Submission Level
Application
REASON FOR REQUEST **NOTE-Use ALT+Enter to go to a new line in the box below. Just using the Enter key will exit the box.**
Issue
(DIM, APP, Sub-Supplier, Process, Tooling, Capacity, Start-up, …) Action Plan Completion Date
WHERE APPLICABLE, ARE INTERIM ISSUES ADDRESSED ON THE EARLY PRODUCTION PRE-LAUNCH
CONTROL PLAN? (e.g. 100% inspection, rework, temporary operations) Please explain below.
Organization Authorized Signature Date
Print Name Phone No. Fax
Title Email
For Customer Use Only

Interim Worksheet Disposition: Approved Rejected
Comment:
Supplier Quality Engineer Signature
Print Name

1AF0003 0d. Interim Recovery Rev 10/27/2021
DFMEA-Design Failure Modes Effects Analysis
Application: Design Responsibility: DFMEA Number:

Part Number: Key Date: Prepared by:
Part Name: Location: Date (Orig.)
Team: Date (Rev.)
DFMEA - (Format for example only; Supplier created templates may be used) Action Results
Occurrence
Occurrence
Detection
Detection
Severity
Severity
Potential Potential
Potential Failure Current Recommended Responsibility & Target
RPN
RPN
Item/Process Step Effect(s) Of Cause(s) Of Action Taken
Mode Controls Action Completion Date
Failure Failure
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1AF0003 4 DFMEA Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

DFMEA Ratings
Criteria: Occurrence of Criteria: Occurrence
Criteria Severity of Effect on Likelihood of Cause - DFMEA of Cause - DFMEA Opportunity Criteria: Likelihood of
Effect Rank Rank Rank
Product (Customer Effect) Failure (Design life/reliability of (Incidents per for Detection Likelihood of Detection by Design Control Detection
item/vehicle) item/vehicle)
Potential failure mode affects safe vehicle
operation and/or involves noncompliance New technology/new design with ≥ 100 per thousand No detection No current design control; Cannot detect or is not Almost
with government regulation without
10 Very High no history. ≥ 1 in 10
10 opportunity analyzed.
10
Impossible
Failure to Meet warning.
Safety and/or
Regulatory
Requirements Potential failure mode affects safe vehicle Failure is inevitable with new Design analysis/detection controls have a weak
design, new application, or 50 per thousand Not likely to detect detection capability; Virtual Analysis (e.g. CAE, FEA,
operation and/or involves noncompliance 9 change in duty cycle/operating 1 in 20
9 at any stage etc.) is not correlated to expected actual operating
Very Remote 9
with government regulation with warning.
conditions conditions.
Product verification/validation after design freeze and

Loss of primary function (vehicle Failure is likely with new design,
20 per thousand prior to launch with pass/fail testing (Subsystem or
inoperable, does not affect safe vehicle 8 High new application, or change in
1 in 50
8 system testing with acceptance criteria such as ride
Remote 8
Loss or operation) duty cycle/operating conditions
handling, shipping evaluation, etc.)
Degradation of
Primary
Function Failure is uncertain with new Product verification/validation after design freeze and
Degradation of primary function (vehicle Post Design
design, new application, or 10 per thousand prior to launch with test to failure testing (Subsystem or
operable, but at reduced level of 7 change in duty cycle/operating 1 in 100
7 Freeze and prior to
system testing until failure occurs, testing of system
Very Low 7
performance) launch
conditions interactions, etc.)
Loss of secondary function (vehicle Frequent failures associated with Product verification/validation after design freeze and
2 per thousand
operable, but comfort/convenience 6 similar designs or in design
1 in 500
6 prior to launch with degradation testing (Subsystem or Low 6
Loss or functions inoperable) simulation and testing. system testing after durability test, e.g. function check).
Degradation of
Secondary
Function Product validation (reliability testing, development or
Degradation of secondary function (vehicle Occasional failures associated
.5 per thousand validation tests) prior to design freeze using pass/fail
operable, but comfort/convenience 5 Moderate with similar designs or in design
1 in 2,000
5 testing (e.g. acceptance criteria for performance,
Moderate 5
functions at reduced level of performance) simulation and testing.
function checks, etc.)
Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle Isolated failures associated with Product validation (reliability testing, development or
.1 per thousand Prior to Design
operable, item does not conform and 4 similar designs or in design
1 in 2,000
4 Freeze
validation tests) prior to design freeze using test to Moderately High 4
noticed by most customers (> 75%). simulation and testing. failure (e.g. until leaks, yields, cracks, etc.)
Product validation (reliability testing, development or

Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle Only isolated failures associated
.01 per thousand validation tests) prior to design freeze using
Annoyance operable, item does not conform and 3 with almost identical design or in
1 in 100,000
3 degradation testing (e.g. data trends, before/after
High 3
noticed by many customers (50%). design simulation and testing.
values, etc.)
Low
Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle Design analysis/detection controls have a strong
No observed failures associated
operable, item does not conform and ≤ .001 per thousand Virtual Analysis - detection capability. Virtual Analysis (e.g. CAE, FEA,
noticed by discriminating customers (<
2 with almost identical design or in
1 in 1,000,000
2 Correlated etc.) is highly correlated with actual or expected
Very High 2
design simulation and testing.
25%). operating conditions prior to design freeze.
Failure cause or failure mode can not occur because it

Detection not
Failure is eliminated through Failure is eliminated is fully prevented through design solutions (e.g., proven
No effect No discernible effects. 1 Very Low preventive control through preventive control.
1 applicable; Failure
design standard, best practice or common material,
Almost Certain 1
Prevention
etc.)

1AF0003 4 DFMEA Ratings Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
Process/Inspection Flowchart
(Format for example only; Supplier created templates may be used)

Application Issue Date
Supplier Name Part Name
Supplier Code Part Number
Legend:
Operation Transportation Inspection Delay Storage
Step Operation or Event Description of Evaluation

Operation or Event and Analysis Methods
10 Operation
20 Transportation
30 Inspection
40 Delay
50 Storage

1AF0003 5 FLOW Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
PFMEA-Process Failure Modes Effects Analysis
Application: Design Responsibility: PFMEA Number:

Part Number: Key Date: Prepared by:
Part Name: Location: Date (Orig.)
Team: Date (Rev.)
PFMEA - (Format for example only; Supplier created templates may be used) Action Results
Occurrence
Occurrence
Detection
Detection
Severity
Severity
Potential Potential Responsibility &
Potential Failure Current Recommended
RPN
RPN
Item/Process Step Effect(s) Of Cause(s) Of Target Completion Action Taken
Mode Controls Action
Failure Failure Date
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

1AF0003 6 PFMEA Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
PFMEA Ratings
Criteria: Criteria: Occurrence
Criteria
Severity of Effect on Process Likelihood of Cause - PFMEA Opportunity for Criteria: Likelihood of
Effect Severity of Effect on Product Effect Rank Rank Rank
(Manufacturing / Assembly of Failure (Incidents per Detection Likelihood of Detection by Process Control Detection
(Customer Effect)
Effect) items/vehicles)

operation and/or involves noncompliance May endanger operator (machine or ≥ 100 per thousand No detection No current process control; Cannot detect or is not
with government regulation without assembly) without warning
10 Very High ≥ 1 in 10
10 opportunity analyzed.
Almost Impossible 10
warning.
Failure to Meet Failure to meet
Safety and/or safety and/or
Regulatory regulatory
Requirements requirement
May endanger operator (machine or 50 per thousand Not likely to detect at Failure Mode and/or Error (Cause) is not easily
operation and/or involves noncompliance
assembly) with warning
9 1 in 20
9 any stage detected (e.g. random audits)
Very Remote 9
with government regulation with warning.
Loss of primary function (vehicle

100% of product may have to be 20 per thousand Problem Detection Failure Mode detection post-processing by operator
inoperable, does not affect safe vehicle Major Disruption
scrapped. Line shutdown or stop ship. 8 High 1 in 50 8 Post Processing through visual/tactile/audible means.
Remote 8
operation)
Loss or Degradation
of Primary Function
A portion of the production run may Failure Mode detection in-station by operator through
Degradation of primary function (vehicle
Significant have to be scrapped. Deviation from 10 per thousand Problem Detection at visual/tactile/audible means or post-processing through
operable, but at reduced level of
disruption primary process including decreased
7 1 in 100
7 Source use of attribute gauging (go/no go, manual torque
Very Low 7
performance)
line speed or added manpower. check/clicker wrench, etc.)
Failure Mode detection post-processing by operator

Loss of secondary function (vehicle
100% of product may have to be 2 per thousand Problem Detection through use of variable gauging or in-station by
operable, but comfort/convenience
reworked off line and accepted. 6 1 in 500 6 Post Processing operator through use of attribute gauging (go/no go,
Low 6
functions inoperable)
manual torque check/clicker wrench, etc.)
Loss or Degradation
Moderate
of Secondary
disruption
Function Failure Mode or Error (Cause) detection in-station by
operator through use of variable gauging or by
Degradation of secondary function (vehicle A portion of the production run may
.5 per thousand Problem Detection at automated controls in-station that will detect discrepant
operable, but comfort/convenience have to be reworked off line and 5 Moderate 1 in 2,000
5 Source part and notify operator (light, buzzer, etc.). Gauging
Moderate 5
functions at reduced level of performance) accepted.
performed on setup and first-piece check (for set-up
causes only).
Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle 100% of production run may have to be Failure Mode detection post-processing by automated
.1 per thousand Problem Detection
operable, item does not conform and reworked in station before it is 4 1 in 10,000
4 Post Processing
controls that will detect discrepant part and lock part to Moderately High 4
noticed by most customers (> 75%). processed. prevent further processing.
Moderate
disruption
Failure Mode detection in-station by automated
Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle A portion of the production run may
.01 per thousand Problem Detection at controls that will detect discrepant part and prevent
Annoyance operable, item does not conform and have to be reworked in-station before it 3 1 in 100,000 3 Source automatically lock part in station to prevent further
High 3
noticed by many customers (50%). is processed.
processing.
Low
Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle
Error Detection Error (Cause) detection in-station by automated
operable, item does not conform and Slight inconvenience to process, ≤ .001 per thousand
noticed by discriminating customers (<
Minor disruption
operation, or operator.
2 1 in 1,000,000
2 and/or Problem controls that will detect error and prevent discrepant Very High 2
Prevention part from being made.
25%).
Error (Cause) prevention as a result of fixture design,

Detection not
Failure is eliminated machine design or part design. Discrepant parts cannot
No effect No discernible effects. No effect No discernible effect. 1 Very Low through preventive control. 1 applicable; Failure
be made because item has been error-proofed by
Almost Certain 1
Prevention
process/product design.
1AF0003 6 PFMEA Ratings Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

CONTROL PLAN
Prototype Pre-Launch Production
Control Plan Number Key Contact/Phone Date (Orig.) Date (Rev.)
Part Number/Revision Core Team Customer Engineering Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
Part Name Supplier/Plant Approval/Date Customer Quality Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
Supplier Name Supplier Code Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
CHARACTERISTICS METHODS
PROCESS MACHINE,
PART/ SPECIAL
NAME/ DEVICE REACTION
PROCESS CHAR. SAMPLE
OPERATION JIG, TOOLS PLAN
NUMBER CLASS PRODUCT / PROCESS EVALUATION / CONTROL
DESCRIPTION FOR MFG. NO. PRODUCT PROCESS
SPECIFICATION / MEASUREMENT SIZE FREQ. METHOD
TOLERANCE TECHNIQUE

1AF0003 7 CPLAN Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
GR&R ANOVA Requirements
Variable Analysis
Anova Method is only acceptable method.
- Select a minimum of 10 parts.
- Select a minimum of 3 operators.
Results
-Number of distinct categories shall be 5 or greater.
-For Powertrain and like type components Total Gage R&R shall be less than 10%.
-For all other components Total Gage R&R shall be less than 20%.
-Please consult your SQE for any variable results over these limits.
Attribute Agreement Analysis

Attribute Risk Method is only acceptable method.
-Select a minimum of 3 operators, perform 3 trials.
-Select a minimum of 50 parts.
-Validate selected parts with variable gage such as CMM.
-10% below and above boundary limits.
-25% at and around upper and lower boundary limit.
-30% between boundary limits to represent range of normal process variation.
Results
-Kappa coefficient between operators must exceed 0.70, greater than 0.80 preferred.
-Kappa coefficient operator to standard must exceed 0.70, greatet than 0.80 preferred.

1AF0003 8 GR&R Requirements Rev 10/27/2021
Gage R&R ANOVA Analysis Report
SUPPLIER NAME: GAGE NAME: NOMINAL: DATE:
PART NO.: GAGE NO.: TOL(+):
PERFORMED BY:
CHARACTERISTIC: GAGE TYPE: TOL(-):
PART
APPRAISER A NAME:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
TRIAL
1
2
GAGE
GAGE R
R&&R
R SUMMARY
SUMMARY
3 MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS
AVERAGE XBARA REPEATABILITY (EV) Number of Distinct

RANGE RBARA (EQUIPMENT VARIATION): Categories
REPRODUCIBILITY (AV) WARNINGS

APPRAISER B NAME: PART (APPRAISER VARIATION):
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
R&R
1 (REPEATABILITY & REPRODUCIBILITY):
TRIAL 2
3 PART VARIATION (PV):
AVERAGE XBARB TOTAL VARIATION (TV):

RANGE RBARB
% PROCESS % TOLERANCE
APPRAISER C NAME: PART VARIATION (TV) VARIATION (TOL)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
1 % EQUIPMENT VARIATION:
TRIAL 2 % APPRAISER VARIATION:
3 % TOTAL GAGE R & R:
% PART VARIATION:
AVERAGE XBARC
RANGE RBARC
REPEATABILITY RANGE CONTROL CHART
XBARp N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A # PARTS
APPRAISER B 0 APPRAISER C
M (FOR EV(K1) = # OF TRIALS)(FOR AV(K2) = # APPR AND G=1)(FOR PV(K3) = # OF PARTS AND G=1)
APPRAISER A
12.000 UCL-R #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! OP1? 0 d2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12.000 12.000
10.000 LCL-R #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
R - OP1
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
10.000
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! OP2? 0 1 1.410 1.910 2.240 2.480 2.670 2.830 2.960 3.080 3.180
RBARBAR #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
UCL-R #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! OP3? 0 R 2- OP2 10.000
1.280 1.810 2.150 2.400 2.600 2.770 2.910 3.020 R -3.130
OP3
8.000 8.000 UCL-R UCL-R
XBARBAR #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
LCL-R #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! # OPER 0 3 8.000
1.230 1.770 2.120 2.380 2.580 2.750 2.890 3.010 3.110
6.000 6.000 #DIV/0! LCL-R LCL-R
UCL-XBAR #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
RBARB #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! # TRIALS (M) 0 4 6.000
1.210 1.750 2.110 2.370 2.570 2.740 2.880 3.000 3.100
4.000 RBARB RBARB
LCL-XBAR #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
AR
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4.000 #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! (G) 0.000 G 5 4.000
1.190 1.740 2.100 2.360 2.560 2.730 2.870 2.990 AR3.100
AR
2.000 2.000 2.000
d2A(EV)= 0.000 d2(EV)= 0.000 6 1.180 1.730 2.090 2.350 2.560 2.730 2.870 2.990 3.100
0.000 0.000d2(PV)= 0.000 d2(AV)= 0.000 0.000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PART APPRAISER AVERAGE CHART

7 1.170 1.730 2.090 2.350 2.550 2.720 2.870 2.990 3.100
COUNT D4 D3 APPRAISER
A2 3/d2 A SIZE A2 D3 D4 3/d2 TOLERANCE APPRAISER B
XDiff (Ro): 0.000 8 1.170 1.720 2.080 APPRAISER
2.350 2.550 C
2.720 2.870 2.980 3.090
0 0 0 0 0 2 1.88 0 3.268 2.659 0 Rp: 0.000 9 12.000 1.720
1.160 2.080 2.340 2.550 2.720 2.860 2.980 3.090
12.000 Xavg - 12.000
3 1.023 0OP1 2.574 1.772 0 AV1: #DIV/0! 10 -
Xavg 1.160
10.000 1.720 2.080 2.340 2.550 2.720 2.860 2.980 Xavg3.090
-
10.000 10.000 OP2 OP3
8.000 4 0.729 0UCL- 2.282 1.457 AV2: #DIV/0! 11
UCL- 1.160
8.000 1.710 2.080 2.340 2.550 2.720 2.860 2.980 UCL-3.090
XBAR 8.000
5 0.577 0LCL- 2.114 6.000
1.29 XBAR
12 1.150 2.980 XBAR
6.000 LCL- 6.000 1.710 2.070 2.340 2.550 2.720 2.850 3.090
XBAR LCL-
4.000 G XBAR
13 1.150
4.000 1.710 2.070 2.340 2.550 2.710 2.850 2.980 XBAR3.090
XBARBA 4.000 XBARB
2.000 R
2.000 14
AR 1.150
2.000 1.710 2.070 2.340 2.540 2.710 2.850 2.980 XBARBAR
3.080
0.000 0.000 15 1.150
0.000 1.710 2.070 2.340 2.540 2.710 2.850 2.980 3.080
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >15 1.128 1
1.693 2 3
2.059 4 2.326
5 62.5347 8
2.704 9 2.847
10 2.970 3.078
All calculations are based upon predicting 5.15 sigma (99% of the area under the normal distribution curve).
AV - If a negative value is calculated under the square root sign, the appraiser variation (AV) defaults to zero (0).
1AF0003 8 ANOVA GR&R Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021


Part Number Gage Name Date Performed Appraiser A
Part Name Gage Number Gage Type Appraiser B
Characteristic Pass Condition Fail Condition Appraiser C
DATA TABLE
Reference
PART A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1 C-2 C-3 Reference Value Code
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47

1AF0003 8 GR&R Att Agr Rev 10/27/2021
48
Risk Analysis
A * B Crosstabulation
B
Total
0 1
0 Count 0 0 0
Expected Count
A
1 Count 0 0 0
Expected Count
Count 0 0 0
Total
Expected Count
B * C Crosstabulation
C
Total
0 1
0 Count 0 0 0
Expected Count
B
1 Count 0 0 0
Expected Count
Count 0 0 0
Total
Expected Count
A * C Crosstabulation
C
Total
0 1
0 Count 0 0 0
Expected Count
A
1 Count 0 0 0
Expected Count
Count 0 0 0
Total
Expected Count
Kappa A B C
A -
B -
C -
DETERMINATION
AxB
AxC
BxC
Approved for Use Date

1AF0003 8 GR&R Att Agr Rev 10/27/2021
Dimensional Test Results
SUPPLIER NAME: PART NUMBER:

SUPPLIER CODE: PART NAME:
NAME OF INSPECTION FACILITY: REVISION:

DATE:
Supplier required to provide marked up drawing to identify items inspected.

TOLERANCE SPECIFICATION / LIMITS MEASUREMENT RESULTS (DATA)
DIMENSION / GAGE QTY.
ITEM OK NOT OK
SPECIFICATION TYPE* TESTED Piece 1 Piece 2 Piece 3 Piece 4 Piece 5 Piece 6
- + MIN MAX
ex 4 1.000 1.000 3 5 Caliper 6 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 2.000 - X
*Traceable to NIST Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

1AF0003 9 Dimensional Test Results Rev 10/27/2021
Material Test Results


DATE:
MEASUREMENT RESULTS (DATA)

Material Spec. No. / Rev / Date Specification / Limits Test Date Test Method OK NOT OK
Piece 1 Piece 2 Piece 3
1AF0003 10 Material Test Results Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Performance Test Results


DATE:
MEASUREMENT RESULTS (DATA)

Material Spec. No. / Rev / Date Specification / Limits Test Date Test Method OK NOT OK
Piece 1 Piece 2 Piece 3
1AF0003 10 Performance Test Results Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Print Notes - Paint and Coating
(Attach Paint and Coating Test Results)
NAME OF INSPECTION FACILITY: ENGINEERING REVISION LEVEL

DATE:
Supplier required to provide marked up drawing to identify all "PRINT NOTES" verified.
Document Painting Method / Industry Standard used to prepare these components.
Method # / Finishing Requirement on Drawing:
Cleaning Standard Utilized:
Pretreat Standard Utilized:
SPECIFICATION / LIMITS GAGE QTY. SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS (DATA)
Characteristic Standard OK NOT OK
MIN MAX TYPE TESTED Piece 1 Piece 2 Piece 3
Prime Coat:
Blast Profile
Thickness*
Thickness (including blast profile)*
Permeability
Adhesion
Oven Cure Time (if used)
Ambient Cure Time (if used)
Salt Spray
Top Coat:
Thickness (over primer)*
Total Thickness (reference)*
Permeability
Adhesion
* Rejection will not be made based on coating thickness in excess of the maximum alone, but on a subsequent performance failure per MIL-DTL 53072 Sec 4.2.3.3.
Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.

1AF0003 10 Print Notes-Paint & Coating Latest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
Paint Peformance Approval Report
(Paint and Coating Results)
PART NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER APPLICATION
PART NAME SUPPLIER QUALITY ENGINEER E/C REV LEVEL DATE
SUPPLIER NAME MANUFACTURING LOCATION SUPPLIER CODE
REASON FOR PART SUBMISSION WARRANT SPECIAL SAMPLE RE-SUBMISSION OTHER

SUBMISSION PRE TEXTURE FIRST PRODUCTION SHIPMENT ENGINEERING CHANGE
APPEARANCE EVALUATION
Coating Spec (if Applicable) Attribute Frequency SPECIFICATIONS
Color Match
TopCoat Gloss
Crosshatch Adhesion
Solvent Resistence
Pencil Hardness
Film Thickness (Powder) Refer to Applicable QACs and or Specification on print/PO (Contact Buyer)
Film Thickness (Liquid)
Production Adhesion Test
Orange Peel
Salt Spray Creepage
Edge Coverage
COLOR EVALUATION
Color Lot Part # SPECIFICATIONS
JLG Specifications Refer to: Color Code 4150613

JerrDan Specifications Refer to: Color Code Chart 4150613
Pierce Specifications Refer to:
McNeilus Specifications Refer to: TBD
COMMENTS
Document Painting Method / Industry Standard used to prepare these components.
Method # / Finishing Requirement on Drawing:
Cleaning Standard Utilized:
Painting Standard Utilized:
Characteristic SPECIFICATION / LIMITS

GAGE
SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS (DATA) OK NOT OK Notes:
TYPE
MIN MAX Piece 1 Piece 2 Piece 3
Prime Coat:
Blast Profile*
Salt Spray
Top Coat:
* Rejection will not be made based on coating thickness in excess of the maximum alone, but on a subsequent performance failure per MIL-DTL 53072 Sec 4.2.3.3.

If Any Questions - Please Contact Quality Representative from Segment Associated
ORGANIZATION PHONE NO. DATE AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER DATE
SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE

1AF0003 10 Paint Performance Approval Rev 10/27/2021
Print Notes - Welding
(Attach Copy of WPS/PQR Documentation)

DATE:
Supplier required to provide marked up print to identify ALL Weld items.

PQR# CHECK FOR CONFORMANCE
ITEM WELD SYMBOL WELD DESCRIPTION WPS# (IF NOT PRE- OK NOT OK
QUALIFIED) Button Size/Dia. WELD LENGTH WELD QTY
1AF0003 10 Print Notes-Welding Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

WELDING - RECORDED JOINT WELDING PROCEDURES
IN COMPLIANCE WITH WELD SPECIFICATION:

(List Specification Used)
Submit documents with weld sample cut and etch photos (preferred) from each type of weld to
submission.data@amgeneral.com
Supplier Name: Part Number:

Supplier Code: Part Name:
Supplier Address: Drawing Revision:
WPS/PQR PROCEDURE #
REASON FOR SUBMISSION: INITIAL REVISION REASON
APPLICABLE CONTRACT (PROGRAM):
I have read and understand all AM General and welding specification requirements of the part number(s) listed
above and have completed a review of the blue prints, welding symbols and specifications listed. Signature below
of the manufacturers representative is our guarantee that parts will be produced as qualified and no changes will
be made to these procedures without prior approval of AM General.
This weld procedure must be signed by the manufacturer’s representative.
Signature: Manufacturers Representative Date
Print: Manufacturers Representative Position
AM General Representative Position Date
Please verify that all weld samples are from:

Pre-production tooling
Production tooling

1AF0003 10 JOINT WELD PROCEDURE SPECS Latest Edition on AMG Rev 10/27/2021
Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com)
Name Title Date

1AF0003 10 JOINT WELD PROCEDURE SPECS Latest Edition on AMG Rev 10/27/2021
Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com)
RECORDED JOINT WELDING PROCEDURE

FOR RESISTANCE, SPOT, SEAM AND PROJECTION WELDING
IN COMPLIANCE WITH MIL-W-12332

Record Number:
Contents:
Title Sheet
Drawings Showing Location of Joints
Summary Sheet
Recorded Welding Procedure
Signature: Manufacturers Representative Date
Print: Manufacturers Representative Position
AM General Representative Date
Printed Copy Uncontrolled. 27 of 38

1AF0003 10 JOINT WELD PROCEDURE RESISTLatest Edition on AMG Intranet Site (http://home.amgeneral.com) Rev 10/27/2021
Drawings Showing Location of Joints

Summary Sheet

Record Number:
Summary Of Welding Procedure
Joint Reference Material Reference Machine Make Machine Type Machine Size
MATERIAL COMPOSITION
Reference Designation C Mn Si S P Cr Mo

Weld Set-Up Verification
JOB DESCRIPTION:
PART NUMBERS:
NUT / STUD PART #: NUT / STUD SIZE:
PACKAGING INSTRUCTIONS:
MACHINE SETUP: DESCRIPTION OF TEST:

Air Pressure Gage: Hammer & Chisel:
TIP Force (If Req'd): Push-Out Reading:
TAP: Torque Test:
Nugget Diameter:
WELD SEQUENCE: ELECTRODES:

Program: Upper Electrodes:
Squuze Time: Size:
Weld Time: Material:
Weld Heat:
Mod. Weld Heat: Lower Electrodes:
Hold Time: Size:
Repeat: Material:
Init. Squeeze:
TIP Force:
Transfer. TAP: PICTURES OF SET UP AND NOTES
High I:
Low I :
# Of Impulses:
Pulsat Cool:
Preheat Time:
Preheat Time:
Cool Time:
Upslope Time:
Upslope Init:

Dnslope Time:
Post Heat Time:
Post Heat Time:
Quence Time:
Temper Time:
Temper Heat:

Print Notes - Plating
(Attach Plating Test Results)

DATE:
Supplier required to provide marked up drawing to identify all "PRINT NOTES" verified.
Document Plating Method / Industry Standard used to prepare these components.
Plating Type Required:

Industry Standard or Specification Listed on Drawing:
Plating Supplier (If Tier 2):
ATTACH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE HERE
Defense Segment: Compliant to the requirements stated in the Suppliers

(Circle) Yes / No Signed by:
Standards Guide (Section D.32) referencing Hazardous Materials.

If Any Questions - Please Contact Quality Representative from Segment Associated
ORGANIZATION PHONE NO. DATE AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER DATE
SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE
1AF0003 10 Print Notes-Plating Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Initial Process Studies
Supplier Name: Characteristic:

Supplier Code: Reason For Study:
Part Number: Study Date:
Nominal: Prepared By:

Tolerance (+): Date Completed:
Tolerance (-):
Sub-Group# Value 1 Value 2 Value 3 Value 4 Value 5

1 <--- Fill in data horizontally for each subgroup
2
3 Note: Complete all "white" cells in Blue Area.
4
5
6
Supplier Nam
Part Number: Characteristic:
PPC Number: Incident: 0 CPK: #DIV/0!
Nominal: 0 Incident Date: 12/30/1899
Tolerance(+) 0 Prepared By: 0
Tolerance(-) 0 Date Completed: PPK: #DIV/0!
Sub-Group 1 2 3 4 5 Average Range

1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
X-bar X-Bar: 0.0000

UCL: 0.0000 WARNINGS Sigma: 0.0000
LCL: 0.0000 #DIV/0! R-Bar: 0.0000
#DIV/0!
R-bar USL: 0.0000

UCL: 0.0000 WARNINGS LSL: 0.0000
LCL: 0.0000
X-bar Chart R-bar Chart
1.0000 1.0000
0.8000 0.8000
0.6000 0.6000
0.4000 0.4000
0.2000 0.2000
0.0000 0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Ave ra ge UCL L CL Me an Range UCL Mean

1AF0003 11 Initial Process Studies
Initial Process Studies
X-bar X-Bar: 0.0000

UCL: 0.0000 Sigma: 0.0000
LCL: 0.0000 R-Bar: 0.0000
R-bar USL: 0.0000

UCL: 0.0000 LSL: 0.0000
LCL: 0.0000
Misc. Sample Graph Data

X-bar R-bar
UCL LCL Mean subs-out UCL Mean subs-out CPU CPU
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0 CPL CPL
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0
N Curve
n d2 Assigned Bins Bin Freq
2 1.128 23.6000 23.6000 0
3 1.693 23.7030 23.7030 1
4 2.059 23.7149 23.7149 7
5 2.326 23.7277 23.7277 23
6 2.534 23.7405 23.7405 25
7 2.704 23.7533 23.7533 21
8 2.847 23.7600 23.7600 17
9 2.970 23.7700 23.7700 6
10 3.078 23.8010 0
0 0
Misc. Population Graph Data
X-bar R-bar
UCL LCL Mean subs-out UCL Mean subs-out
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0280 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0280 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0280 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0280 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0280 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0280 0
N Curve
Assigned Bins Bin Freq
23.6000 23.6000 0
23.7030 23.7030 1
23.7149 23.7149 7
23.7277 23.7277 23
23.7405 23.7405 25
23.7533 23.7533 21
23.7600 23.7600 17
23.7700 23.7700 6
23.8010 0
0 0

1AF0003 11 Initial Process Studies
ATTENTION!
NON-PPAP APPROVED MATERIAL
INSPECTION VERIFICATION REQUIRED

Part Number
Revision
Supplier Name
Supplier Code
Supplier Inspected By
1AF0003 14 NON-PPAP Approved Label Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

PPAP Sample Parts Label
PPAP SAMPLE PARTS

INSPECTION VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Purchase Order No.
Part Number
Revision
Supplier Name
Supplier Code
Supplier Inspected By

1AF0003 14 Sample PPAP Label Rev 10/27/2021
PPAP Master Sample "Picture" Documentation
SUPPLIER NAME PART NUMBER:
SUPPLIER CODE PART NAME:
ENGINEERING CHANGE LEVEL
Supplier is required to visually document the Master Sample (PPAP Parts):

1.) Document how the parts are labeled. To include any date codes, vendor codes, etc.. (if applicable)
2.) Document the parts as a whole what they look like in the final state in which they are provided to AM General LLC.
PICTURES OF MASTER SAMPLE LABELING
PICTURES OF MASTER SAMPLE PART

1AF0003 15 Master Sample Photo Rev 10/27/2021
Tooling Fixtures - Property of AM General, LLC
SUPPLIER NAME PART NUMBER:
SUPPLIER CODE PART NAME:
TOOL / FIXTURE NUMBER: ENGINEERING CHANGE LEVEL

DATE:
Supplier is required to identify all AM General Owned Tools & Fixtures and document with Photo in PPAP workbook
PHOTO OF AM GENERAL OWNED TOOLING AND FIXTURES

1AF0003 18 Tooling & Fixtures Rev 10/27/2021

Amg Ppap Workbook

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Amg Ppap Workbook

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Revision History

Description of Change Approval Date

Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

PPAP packages are expected to be received by AM General by the agreement

PPAP Submissions are required under the following circumstances:

3) Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional

5) Change to Optional Construction or Material

6) Sub-Supplier or Material Source Change

7) Change in Part Processing

8) Parts produced at Additional Location

10) Changes that impact Performance test methods or results

11) Production rate /cycle time changes

12) AM General or Supplier Production Downtime > 1 year

14) Other, please specify

Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

1AF0003 Information Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Conclusion: Feasible - Product can be produced as specified with no revisions.

Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

Part Name Application

UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN WRITING BY AM GENERAL SUPPLIER QUALITY REPRESENTATIVE (SQE) :

0c) Part Submission Warrant (PSW) S S S S S

0d) Interim Part Submission Warrant (PSW) - if applicable N/A S S S S

3) Customer Engineering Approval - if applicable. R R S S/R R

5) Process Flow Diagram (PFD) R R S S/R R

6) Process Failure Modes Effects Analysis (PFMEA) R R S S/R R

7) Process Control Plan R R S S/R R

9) Dimensional Results - 6 Piece full layout required. R S S S/R R

13) Appearance Approval Report (AAR) - if applicable S R S S/R/O R

16) Checking Aids (Fixture, gage, template, etc) - if applicable R R S S/R/O R

18) Tooling Photo Documentation - if applicable R R S S/R R

1AF0003 0b. Submission Requirements Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Page 5 of 38

Additional Submission Instructions below:

1AF0003 0b. Submission Requirements Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Page 6 of 38

Part Name Part Number Revision

Supplier Manufacturing Information Customer Information

Street Address Buyer

City State Zip Country Application

REASON FOR SUBMISSION (check at least one)

Submission Level (check one)

List Molds / Cavities / Production Processes:

Organization Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Phone No. Fax

For Customer Use Only

1AF0003 0c. PSW Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Supplier Name Part Name

Organization Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Phone No. Fax

For Customer Use Only

Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

Application: Design Responsibility: DFMEA Number:

1AF0003 4 DFMEA Printed Copy Uncontrolled. Rev 10/27/2021

Product verification/validation after design freeze and

Product validation (reliability testing, development or

Failure cause or failure mode can not occur because it

Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

(Format for example only; Supplier created templates may be used)

Step Operation or Event Description of Evaluation

Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

Application: Design Responsibility: PFMEA Number:

Printed Copy Uncontrolled.

Potential failure mode affects safe vehicle

Loss of primary function (vehicle

Failure Mode detection post-processing by operator

Error (Cause) prevention as a result of fixture design,