Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Science Direct
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494619308415
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217302947
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716019300958
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025519300039
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025517310472
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715010802
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096599781630076X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210650216304102
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494617306191
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896316311715
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050916311723
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231218308348
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217300973
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835219306527
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121218301523
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718310026
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281630845X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050920308097
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050919300420
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827117311186
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210650217305825
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923617300234
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417417308539
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494616303969
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050920304701
?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835220303417
?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121216301911
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054815002786
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715006426
Springer
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2109/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-23960-1_21
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2109/article/10.1007/s00500-017-2997-5
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2109/article/10.1007/s10586-017-1388-0
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2109/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-6648-6_27
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2109/article/10.1186/s40411-017-0037-x
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2109/article/10.1007/s10664-018-9647-0
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2109/article/10.1007/s10664-018-9656-z
riority") AND "software project" AND ("scheduling'"OR "scheduling problem")
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Aldi
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
Abid
RQ 1
Title Publication frequency and
Intelligent Software Project Scheduling and Team topics
2011, International Conference
Staffing withresource
Multi-mode Genetic leveling
Algorithms
in projects with mode- on Engineering
2017, Applications
Expert Systems With of
dependent generalized
Self-configuring precedence
Intelligent relations
Water Drops Algorithm for Applications, Shanghai
2019, ICITS, Chile
Software Project Scheduling Problem
An ontology-based approach with which to 2018, Science of Computer
assign
A Q-learning-based memetic algorithm for multi- Programming,
human resources to software projects 2018, Infromatic Spain &
Science,
objective dynamic software project scheduling China
Evolutionarymulti- and USA Journal of
2016, European
objectiveresourceallocationandschedulinginthe
Investigating the impact of developer Operational
2016, Research,
Advances in
productivity, task interdependence type
A knowledge-guided multi-objective fruit fly and Engineering Software,
2018, Swarm and
optimization algorithm for the multi-skill
An Evolutionary Hyper-heuristic for the Evolutionary
2016, ParallelComputation,
Problem
Software Project Scheduling Problem
Firework-based software project scheduling Solving from Nature
2018, Soft Computing, –
method considering
Firefly Algorithm the learning
to Solve and
a Project forgetting China
Scheduling 2016, Artificial Intelligence
Problem
Solving the Software Project Scheduling Perspectives
2019, ICAISCin2019,Intelligent
Brazil
Problem with Hyper-heuristics
Dynamic Software Project Scheduling Problem 2020, BRACIS 2020, Brazil
with PSO
Hybrid and Dynamic
Differential Strategies
Evolution Based on
and Greedy 2018, Applied Soft
Algorithm (DEGR) forsolving Multi-Skill
A Multi-Objective Dedicated Local Search for Computing, Poland
2016, IFAC-PapersOnLine,
Project Scheduling Problem
Optimizing Basic COCOMO Model Using Colombia, Chile, Francea
In this research paper,
Simplified Genetic Algorithm simplified genetic algorithm
RQ 2 RQ 3
Objective and contributions Intelligent techniques
Optimize scheduling depends on GA
preference
propose twoofsolution
PM. approaches: Gradient Descent, GA (estimation of
decomposition and integration.
Reducing adjustment These
of parameters in ap- distribution
Water dropsalgorithm)
algorithm
SPSP. The adjustment of parameters
integrates semantic technologies, and DSS using ontology & semantic
more specifically
Proposes a more ontologies,
realistic in order annotation
a multi-objective two-archive
mathematical
This model for
paper develops the dynamic A
a multi-objective memetic algorithm
cooperative based on Q-
coevolutionary multi-
model
This for scheduling
paper proposes an theapproach
BeiDou objectiveMOCell,
namely algorithm(CC-MOA)
NSGA-II, PAES,
that makes use of multi-objective
In this paper, a knowledge-guided and SPEA2
a knowledge-guided multi-objective
multi-objective fruit fly optimization
Propose an evolutionary hyper- fruit fly optimization
Evolutionary algorithm
algorithm (GA)
heuristic to solve the SPSP.
They focus on the influence of the Different Fireworks algorithm, WLC
learning and forgetting effect
They propose then to solve the on Firefly algorithm
problem with a Firefly algorithm.
This work proposes an offline HH FA is Speed- Constrained Multi-objective
named Grammatical Evolution
investigate the Particle Swarm Hyper- Swarm
Particle Particle
Swarm Optimization
Optimization
Optimization (PSO) [2]
Paper presents a hybrid Differential the new hybrid DEGR (Differential
Evolution and Greedy Algorithm
This paper presents a dedicated local Evolution
The NALS and Greedy
method Algorithm) in
was developed
search method, called NALS, oriented two phases. First was focused on
RQ 4 RQ 5
Results Future works
The genetic algorithm uses corresponding Multi-objective optimisation rather than using the
objective functionsatolarger
For all algorithms, handle constraints
number of aggregation
integrate ourof individual
algo- rithmsobjective functions.
into project Improve
management
modes leads
In the four to improved
instances usedperformance.
in this work, inIn software. Thisas
it is proposed willa make
futureour al-the
work gorithms more
self-configuring of
the that contains 10 employees, 10 tasksthe soil parameter incorporating another type of
obtained encouraging results with F- current version does not use the semantic
measure scores of 0.7131 (P60),
Experimental results show that the description
first, a moreofsophisticated
employees regarding their
mathematical
strategies
The resultsdesigned
suggest in MOTAMAQ
that the CCMOAare focus
formulation of the MODSPSP
on modeling more complexshould be created.
environments
performs very well in comparison to the in R&D project management. Project networks
the MOFOA can obtain more Pareto The future work is to further consider the
solutions
The resultsthan the RAND,
indicate how the NSGA2
fitnessand proficiency of differenthuman
detailed analysis of the behavior resources in the
of the proposed
achieved by GA-SMAB
The experimental resultsisfor
thedifferent
lowest of algorithm
he softwareand the reasons
project for its
scheduling ability towith
problems
learning–forgetting
Regarding the fitness characteristics
we can see that fuzzy duration
integration considering search
of autonomous learninginandthe forgetting
solving
Firefly has better results
It takes eight execu- tions fortoallgenerate process, which in many cases has
improve the GE-SPSP in order to reduce the demonstrated
a
theconfiguration set as ALGand
variant SMPSO-HP25 8, that execution
evaluate thetime, also intend
algorithms to model
in more GE-SPSP
instances of
SMPSO-HP100 were compared
The results have been worse than with DSPSP, increase the number
focused on duration-optimization with of objective
the results from other reference
As a result, the set of solutions found by variouskinds of methods,
Finally, the evaluation mostly
of NALS heuristics,
method and
in other
NALS presented good coverage of the theoretical project scheduling problems and on
(HELPER)
How they defined the problem
They model the problem as a two
problems: schedule RLP
Solving multi-mode constraint
(MRLP) and skill
with
view of multiple
behavior modesdrops
of the water and mode-
when flow
through a river where they seek the