Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1186/s40604-015-0018-1
* Correspondence: dzouain@usp.br
1
Center for Technology Policy and Abstract
Management, University of São
Paulo, 908 Professor Luciano A large part (85%) of Brazil’s population lives in urban areas. Roughly half of these
Gualberto Av., Room B114, São dwellers are located in large cities, defined as having 750,000 or more inhabitants.
Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil The urbanization trend is due to historical migration movements that occurred
2
Nuclear and Energy Research
Institute (IPEN), São Paulo, SP, Brazil mostly before the recent phenomenon of globalization. Nevertheless, the growth
Full list of author information is of these urban centers is characterized by insufficient public policies capable of
available at the end of the article ensuring quality of life to its residents. The main assumption of this paper is that
large cities may adopt as a strategy the establishment of laboratories of innovation
focused on urban development. This effort requires the municipal leadership
to organize ways for stimulating the citizens or at least some segments of the
population to use creativity and knowledge in order to propose feasible innovative
solutions to the serious urban problems they face. In Brazil, Science and Technology
Parks (STPs) have assumed the role of laboratories of urban pertinent innovation in
several cases. The aim of this research is to study STPs and their possible
contribution to sustainable transformation of cities and regions in Brazil, a large,
heavily populated and countrywide diverse upper-middle-income economy. The
research question is: what makes STPs contribute to improving the quality of
urban development? The methodology unfolds according to the following steps:
(i) preliminary diagnosis, (ii) learning process - good practice studies; and (iii)
feedback - key lessons - revisiting STP models. Based on a review of the Brazilian
experience, this article points out that (i) STPs in different parts of the country
have been actually functioning as laboratories of innovation that generate solutions
applicable to urban development; (ii) as in high-income economies - mainly in the USA,
where they originated in the 1950s, STPs in an upper-middle-income economy were
capable of rapidly becoming hubs of innovation ecosystems in diverse cities and regions
(it should be noted that, with only a few earlier exceptions, the widespread emergence
of STPs in Brazil is a phenomenon of the 2000s); and (iii) there is an essential need to use
tools that assist STPs in the planning and coordination processes, in order to achieve a
level of institutional articulation in the city or region that enables Triple Helix-alike
innovation ecosystems to lever sustainable urban transformation.
Keywords: Science and Technology Park; Innovation habitat; Urban development;
Innovation policy; Regional development
© 2015 Zouain and Plonski; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 2 of 22
Multilingual abstract
Please see Additional file 1 for translation of the abstract into Arabic.
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 6 of 22
Introduction
According to the World Bank classification, Brazil is an upper-middle-income econ-
omya. Outstanding geographical characteristics are size and population, both among
the world’s highest, making the country a member of the so-called BRICSb. Among
its peers, Brazil has the largest proportion of the population (85%) living in urban
areas, with roughly half of these dwellers located in large cities, defined as having
750,000 or more inhabitants.
The urbanization trend is due to historical migration movements that occurred
mostly before the recent phenomenon of globalization. A main trigger of
urbanization was the successful process of rapid industrialization that began in the
mid-1950s, powered by an active public policy of substituting imports by locally
manufactured products. An unforeseen consequence of this policy was the spontan-
eous attraction of millions of unskilled peasants by cities and metropolitan areas
with new boosting industries, such as the automotive cluster in Greater São Paulo.
As no city was minimally prepared for such a massive influx of population, major
urban problems arose and, in many cases, remain until present times.
In fact, the growth of these urban centers in Brazil is characterized by hypo-
sufficiency of public policies capable of ensuring quality of life for their inhabitants, in-
cluding critical aspects such as urban mobility, quality of housing, job opportunities
and income, culture, and environment (Martine and McGranahan 2010). Indeed,
according to the City Prosperity Index developed by the United Nations Human
Settlements Programmec, Brazil’s most populated metropolitan area (São Paulo) ranks
below its parallels in Russia (Moscow) and China (Shanghai), but above its equivalents
in India (Mumbai) and South Africa (Johannesburg).
This article addresses the topic of Science and Technology Parks (STPs) as laborator-
ies of innovation, serving as tools for urban transformation in Brazil,
Presuppositions
The main presuppositions for this paper, all referred to the Brazilian context, are the
following:
a) The expansion of urbanization comprises not only the growth of large cities and
metropolitan regions but also the densification of urban networks by means of
strengthening medium size cities located near these regions;
b) The installation of industries in cities located near large urban centers responds
to a need to find sites that offer lower costs for carrying out their activities; such
a logistics strategy fosters a demand for new alternatives to quality investments,
formation of specialized human capital, and mechanisms to access knowledge
(e.g., technology transfer);
c) The Brazilian context is consistent with global aspects of urban development, i.e.,
a tendency towards an increasing proportion of urban population, associated with
growing concerns regarding the consequences of disturbances in the planet’s
ecosystems;
d) Municipalities and state governments (the latter are legally responsible for the
metropolitan areas) take part in the establishment and management of STPs,
with the intention of making them laboratories of innovation relevant to urban
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 7 of 22
development; the successful endeavors help to overcome the degradation of urban areas
and stimulate the creation of smart solutions for diverse urban problems among
different constituencies (students, start-ups, NGOs, and/or others). The concrete results
of such process of turning knowledge into urban applicable solutions may benefit cities
and regions beyond the one that generated them;
e) STPs contribute to sustainable urban development not only by attracting, coaching,
and hosting developers of smart solutions but also by articulating and then
becoming hubs of regional innovation systems;
f) National and local public authorities formulate policies and implement programs to
speed up business innovation based on technological and managerial knowledge,
including, but not limited to, the creation of innovative companies, assisted by
business incubators and accelerators;
g) Public policies that stimulate STPs favor cross-fertilization between innovative firms and
other actors of the innovation ecosystems, such as universities and research institutions.
It is the authors’ experience that STPs are often important components of Triple
Helix-type environments (Zouain and Plonski 2006).
h) Technical literature highlights the involvement of the regional/local public sector
through organizational structures, legal mechanisms, tax benefits, articulation practices,
and attraction of knowledge-based business. STPs conceived with this systemic
characteristic have been branded third-generation STPs (Allen 2007; ANPROTEC 2008),
an approach that will be expanded further along this article. Established STPs of former
generations, e.g., focused on real estate and facilities management, have been also
encouraged to ‘upgrade,’ by pivoting their mission, vision, and agenda.
Goal
The aim of this paper is to study models of Brazilian innovation habitats, in particu-
lar STPs, and understand their contribution to sustainable transformations of major
cities and regions.
Research question
What makes STPs contribute to improving the quality of urban development?
Methodology
The methodology adopted in this study is based on participatory research - action
learning. Previous academic study and practical involvement of the authors in planning
innovation habitats in Brazil, including STPs, were an important consideration in the
choice of the methodology. The research followed three steps: (i) preliminary diag-
nosis - research on secondary data, literature review; (ii) learning process - by tech-
nical discussions among the authors and good practice studies (observation); and
(iii) feedback/reflection - revisiting the STP models - lessons from urban STP design
and management in Brazil.
the contribution of STPs for urban transformation). The conceptual framework was
designed taking into account the following references and authors:
ANPROTEC (2008) - this study deals with Science and Technology Parks’
generations and models and with STPs’ development in Brazil, providing an
analysis and public policies’ propositions;
Bouchardet (2012) - this book deals with STPs in Brazil as important tools for regional
and urban development and describes, among others, parks in four state capitals - Rio
de Janeiro, Recife, Florianópolis, and Porto Alegre;
Zouain et al. (2014) - this paper provides a reference methodology
for establishing science, technology, and innovation strategies for
technology park projects submitted to the São Paulo State Technology
Parks System;
Zouain et al. (2007) - this paper aims to propose STPs as important tools for urban
development and analyses their contribution to public policies for local sustainable
development; and
Zouain (2003) and Zouain and Plonski (2002) - the paper and the doctoral
dissertation present a proposal for a conceptual model of STPs for urban and
metropolitan regions and analyze a case in the city of São Paulo.
Urban regions as dynamic spaces - the contribution of innovation habitats for revisiting/
reconstructing urban regions and seeking more creative solutions
Can STPs be tools for urban requalification of degraded areas? In order to answer this
question, the following references were studied:
Silva and Silva (2006) discuss and offer some suggestions about
renovation of degraded and depressed areas in the context of the
knowledge society;
Hauser et al. (2005) develop the idea of STP models as tools for urban
requalification of degraded areas, pointing to some international experiences;
(Barcelona Urban 2014) provides important contributions about STPs as
environments for testing solutions to face urban development challenges - mainly
the case that also became the document’s name; and
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 9 of 22
Lapa and Melo (2007) analyze the development of the Porto Digital project, facing
the urban challenges and local policies for requalification of degraded and
depressed areas in the city of Recife, capital of Pernambuco.
Finally, in order to better understand the history of urbanization in Brazil and urban
development policies, the authors of the present article got inspiration in Martine and
McGranahan (2010).
‘A global player, but with local roots’ - Tenants see no boundaries to their commer-
cial activities and seek strong international presence. Therefore, a STP should seek
to strengthen its brand and the visibility of the city and region in which it is
inserted.
‘A part of the community, with care for people and the environment’ - Architectural
and urban designs of STPs take into account not only the quality of space for
corporate activities and conviviality of their members but also the quality of life of
neighboring communities, together with a strong commitment to environmental
sustainability.
‘A healthy business and an opportunity for investment’ - The management team
of a STP should seek financial sustainability, prioritizing efforts to attract private
investment. With regard to tenants, it is important to provide support for accessing
capital for investment in their projects. Therefore, the STP must count on a
specialized team of professionals and a chief executive with leadership skills.
‘An essential element of university activity’ - The STP should be closely integrated
to academic activities of universities and research centers that are its anchors of
knowledge. Tenants should influence the design of undergraduate courses, research
themes, and topics of graduate courses.
‘Part of a multiplicity of networks’ - Connectivity and network activity are essential
to ensure the success of the STP and its companies. Networks should be established
at the local, regional, and international levels, providing tenants access to knowledge
and business opportunities.
‘Focused on the needs of its tenants’ - The management team of the STP should develop
a trusting relationship with the company in order to create real opportunities for
business development and an environment of healthy collaboration.
The trend of STP models more integrated into local/regional sustainable develop-
ment processes is underscored by Sanz (2001) - who is the IASP’s Executive Director.
In his point of view, evolution of the STP model into learning villages comprises busi-
nesses, educational centers, and residential areas; their most important infrastructure is
based on information technology. This evolution got a new impulse since 2012, when
the Association expanded its scope (and name) from STPs to ‘STPs and Areas of
Innovation.’ In the 31st IASP Conference, held in October 2014, Sanz presented a
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 10 of 22
sketchy analysis of these ‘new animals,’ based on the analysis of ten members of the
Association, including Porto Digital, one of the cases described in this paper. He also
underscored the tendency to evolve from greenfields to brownfields as the location for
newcomers.
The notion of sustainable competitiveness argued by Martins (1997) can be added to
this perspective, as the challenges and opportunities in current markets and the trends
of modern societies cause dynamic changes in the structure of business. In fact, new
generations of entrepreneurs are coming up with more comprehensive and systematic
views of environmental issues and their consequences for the survival and success of
business. This author believes that STPs bring quality solutions that consider aspects of
this kind of the multidimensional concept of sustainability, as well as offer excellent
facilities for stimulating the exchange of relevant information, encouraging an atmos-
phere of cooperation, and cross-fertilization. This is essential for the coexistence of
companies that deal with the uncertainties of technological business.
The emblematic case of Spanish STPs is analyzed in the context of the milieu theory
of as an agent of innovation by Ondategui (2001), citing the work of Castells (1992).
The authors consider, in this sense, STPs as planned by different types of stakeholders,
aimed at high-tech sectors, involving new types of productive areas. Thus, these new
spaces of technological innovation are characterized by a kind of flexible and special-
ized production, by a high economic dynamism, allowing the emergence of new models
of local and regional development.
In the context of the Spanish case, and of interest of this study, the present article
highlights the Barcelona project called Poblenou - District 22 @ BCN, a particularly in-
teresting requalification of depressed urban areas. It is considered a new approach to
thinking and changing the city, adapted to the information society. It has a focus on in-
formation technology and communication industries and is inserted in the concept of
knowledge city, i.e., a sustainable city from the environmental point of view. Based on a
new development model, rational and consistent, it proposes the optimization of the
exchange of knowledge and experiences that enrich urban ecosystems. It also provides
people with a better quality of life, making them more qualified and integrated into the
system and providing competitiveness to the territory (Silva and Silva 2006.
The Barcelona Urban Lab (BUL) should be mentioned in the above-mentioned con-
text. The 22@Barcelona municipal company is responsible for consolidating Barcelona’s
role as an innovative city. BUL was created as a specific line of action to foster use of
the city as an urban laboratory. Through this project, the city is made available to com-
panies with innovative projects to test their infrastructures and services for the future
in a real environment. The definition of Urban Lab by Barcelona Urban Lab (2014) is:
‘…a tool to facilitate the use of public spaces in the city of Barcelona to carry out tests
and pilot programs on products and services with an urban impact, which are in the
pre-market stage and in line with the Barcelona City Council’s aims, priorities and lines
of action.’
In Brazil, several of the STP projects were designed from a perspective of urban de-
velopment and requalification, since the urban centers in the country are characterized
by the transition between the production model of industrial society and the urban
model of the information society. Indeed, Martine and McGranahan (2010) highlight a
massive and rapid urban growth in Brazil, with absolute lack of public policies to
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 11 of 22
deal with this phenomenon, which has greatly impacted the populations of large cities,
especially regarding the lack of leisure, cultural facilities, employment, and income
opportunities, as well as housing, i.e., quality of life.
These repressed tension exploded in June 2013, only 3 years after the above-
mentioned publication, triggered by the announcement of a small increase in public
transportation charges (the increase was 20 centavos of a real, equivalent to 8 US dollar
cents). A chain of urban revolts took over several of Brazil’s major cities centers. They
brought to the streets an odd combination of middle class (including public servants),
squatters and hooligans, led by university students. The mottos of the manifestations
were ‘It is not about the 20 centavos’ and ‘We want (health, transportation, housing…)
according to FIFA standards,’ alluding to the unusual high quality of the infrastructure
that was being built at that time to serve for the following year’s World Cup, conform-
ing to the strict high-level quality requirements included in the contract signed
between Brazil’s Federal Government and the International Federation of Soccer
Association (the acronym in Portuguese is FIFA).
Hauser et al. (2005) highlight this framework in which, lacking clear intervention
of public administration, cities grow without control, mainly through peripheral occu-
pations. Meanwhile, other centralities arise, caused by the new means of production
(typical of the knowledge society), resulting in evasion of areas previously occupied, es-
pecially in the case of city centers. This situation is clear in large urban centers, among
others, in the cases of Recife (Pernambuco State capital), Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do
Sul State capital), São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro (respectively, capitals of the states with
the same name).
The ANPROTECe (2008) study, commissioned by the Brazilian Association for In-
dustrial Development and the Ministry of Science and Technology, points to a set of
challenges to be faced by the Brazilian STP projects. Comparing the key findings of the
survey prepared by Battelle Technology Partnership Practice in cooperation with the
(BATTELLE 2007), it can be seen that, although recognizing the vast North American
experience in STPs, some challenges of these innovation habitats are similar in both
studies, as shown in Table 1.
The innovative entrepreneurship in Brazil has grown significantly in recent decades,
with important participation of the innovation habitats in the development and econ-
omy of Brazilian regions. In the University of Brasília CDT/UnB (2013) study, commis-
sioned by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, the updated data of this
movement are pointed out (Table 2).
and Melo (2007). The brief description of each case was enriched by qualitative ele-
ments derived from following up closely the evolution of these initiatives almost since
their inception. In the São Paulo case, the present authors contributed to its conception
and to some of the implementation efforts.
The following research vectors were focused: (i) history and local/regional impact,
management model and real state strategy, (ii) vocation, and (iii) future perspectives
and strategies. The main results are presented below.
This large facility became another milestone in the research of deep water technologies,
a field in which Brazil excels (Petrobras, the major Brazilian oil and gas concern, has been
repeatedly awarded coveted international prizes in offshore exploration). The subjacent
reason is an iconic Triple Helix case - a close-knitted network involving: (i) three comple-
mentary laboratory facilities in three different institutions - UFRJ, University of São Paulo
(USP), and the São Paulo State Technological Research Institute; (ii) a key large sophisti-
cated user (Petrobras); (iii) legal requirements for significant R&D investment by oil pro-
ducers, strictly enforced by the National Oil, Gas and Biofuels Regulatory Agency; and (iv)
strong financial support for R&D and innovation projects in this field by government
funding agencies.
The Rio Science Park achieved wide impact in its first 10 years of operation:
The STP, located in an until recently deteriorated swampy area, now contributes
effectively to a greater visibility of Rio de Janeiro’s technological vocation; the Park
is widely recognized as an important element in the revival of the city, affected by
decades of economic and social decadence;
Research and Development centers established in the Park by world class
multinational companies such as Schlumberger, Baker Hughes, FMC Technologies,
Usiminas, Halliburton, Tenaris Confab, BG, EMC, Siemens, and GE joined an
existing set of R&D public and semi-public preexisting technology and innovation
hubs based around UFRJ’s campus, mainly Cepel (Electrical Energy Research
Center), Cenpes (Petrobras Oil & Gas Research Center), and Fiocruz (National
Health Research Center).
strong performance in research and the vast array of projects conducted with private
companies. It was triggered by the enthusiastic feedback given by a faculty member of
the information technology track, after participating, in representation of the institu-
tion, at the II National Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation, in 2001,,
which was a watershed for putting innovation into the Brazilian public and private
agendas.
The STP, known by the acronym Tecnopuc, is situated in the University campus, in
the center of Porto Alegre, a city with more than 1.5 million inhabitants that is an
important economic center in the southern region of the country. One of the goals of
Tecnopuc is to consolidate a cooperation network that contributes to promoting scien-
tific and technological development of the city, under the umbrella of the Porto Alegre
Technopole Project.
The initial contribution of Tecnopuc to the urban tissue of Porto Alegre was the
retrofitting of a military installation nearby the campus that was being decommis-
sioned, to rapidly serve as the first physical base of the STP.
the city of São Paulo. USP is Latin America’s top institution the main global universities
rankings.
The goals of the project are (i) to accommodate companies engaged in the commer-
cial application of S&T&I, creating a cross-fertilization environment; (ii) to develop ac-
tivities including R&D, innovative processes, production, sales, and services; (iii) to
stimulate quality gains and competitiveness in the productive process of the small- and
medium-size companies in the region; (iv) to contribute to regional development of
public policies/(v) the recovery of degraded areas of the city, by generating a healthy
urban movement; (vi) to attract new business in modern productive sectors by estab-
lishing an international network of cooperation; and (vi) to promote social and cultural
development of the region by mobilizing the local community and government and pri-
vate organizations, engaging multiple interest groups.
Other challenges include (i) developing a partnership model for attracting the
private sector for the development of phase 2 of the STP, therefore combining
private and public real estate initiatives, and (ii) to develop a marketing plan to
entice technology-based firms to the STP, particularly with respect to attracting re-
search centers of large national and multinational companies, as well as to articulate
research groups of the University to act in cooperative projects with these
companies.
Conclusions
The research question posed was: ‘what makes STPs contribute to improving the qual-
ity of urban development?’
Albeit unique in each of the cases thoroughly studied and briefly reported in this art-
icle, the distinctive motivations to actively contribute to the quality of local urban de-
velopment have in common the fact that they are present very early in the Park history.
They are often linked to an opportunity, as in the narrative of Porto Digital, enabling
access to a substantial grant, needed to make the STP take-off, conditioned to a com-
plicated brownfield physical base. Similarly, in the case of Sapiens, the access to the
huge area (4.3 million m2) that for years had been kept off-limits to economic activity
was approved by the State assembly only after it was made clear that environmental
concerns were perceived by the Park management not only as a restriction but also as
driver to some of the projects to be installed.
It should not be understood that the access to essential resources (money, land, etc.)
was the only motivation. On the contrary of becoming a bureaucratic burden, the
deep involvement of STPs in the efforts to improve urban quality became a source of
pride and distinctiveness. And, naturally, also a motto to attract tenants and part-
ners. The uncertainties associated with such challenges and the need to carefully ex-
periment models justifies the expression laboratories of innovation, used throughout
this article.
Another means of contribution of the innovation habitats to the urban quest is the gen-
eration of appropriate new solutions by companies they nurture. An illustrative solution is
Colab, an application aimed at connecting the citizens with the municipal authorities,
using the potential of social networks. Launched in April 2013 by a start-up located in
Porto Digital, Colab already got two coveted prizes: (i) the AppMyCity, given to the best
application of urban interest at the New Cities Summit, and (ii) in February 2015, at the
World Summit Award Mobile, with the partnership of the United Nations as of the
world’s five best platforms for government and participation. The young entrepreneurs
used Recife as a test bench and, after receiving the first prize, got interest from other mu-
nicipalities in Brazil, one of the Florianópolis.
From the studies conducted in this research, focusing on Brazilian cases, STPs may
be important articulators for local/regional innovation systems. However, in order to
optimize the articulation actions, it is essential to have access to tools and public pol-
icies that assist in the planning and coordination process, which can be organized on a
local/regional basis, including metropolitan regions.
As can be seen in the Brazilian cases, as well as in those indicated in the literature re-
view, STPs can be important inductors of qualification in degraded and depressed areas
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 20 of 22
in large urban centers. However, there are difficulties in deployment and development
of these innovation habitats due to the need to overcome land property issues, particu-
larly with regard to public properties.
Based on three of the cases studied, namely in the cities of Rio de Janeiro, Recife, and
Florianopolis, the importance of coordination between the various levels of govern-
ment, especially municipal and regional, is critical. A similar articulation has not yet oc-
curred in the São Paulo case, which has delayed the implementation of the project.
This has prevented the advance of qualified urban development in the region, which
could take advantage of the opportunities derived from University of São Paulo’s cam-
pus vicinity.
Some key lessons from urban technology parks projects, focusing on the Brazilian
cases, are proposed:
Innovation habitats, such as the estimated 1,000 STPs that emerged since the 1950s
worldwide, are eminent Triple Helix loci. They provide, in a concrete place, favorable
conditions that are relevant for sustaining industry-academia-government dynamics to-
wards systematic innovation.
Place in a STP is a tenet that goes beyond the physical reality of collocated academic
laboratories, technology-based small companies, corporate R&D centers, and offices of
public support agencies. Equally important is the institutional space established at the
STP management apex, e.g., the Management Board, the Steering Committee and/or
the Advisory Board. They are usually composed of top members of government, private
sector, and academia who, in many cases, had no previous communication channels
among them. The board meetings serve as mind openers, providing insights about the
Zouain and Plonski Triple Helix (2015) 2:7 Page 21 of 22
values, rationale, priorities, and limitations of the other members. They also enable a
collegial relationship, which facilitates the identification and negotiation of cooperation
opportunities among the participating institutions.
The participation of a high-level representative of the STP city’s mayor (sometimes
the mayor himself/herself ) is a strong inductor of innovative solutions for urban and
regional transformation. Therefore, going beyond labels such as smart cities, knowledge
cities, and others, the interaction between the City Hall and STP helps cities to be not
only platforms but also objects of innovation.
The mental space occupied by these endeavors in the imagination of the local society
is also of relevance. They become flagships of an alternative path that, on the one hand,
leapfrog the traditional economic development process and, on the other hand, show
the feasibility of embedding hi-tech innovation in the urban fabric.
Endnotes
a
Brazil at a Glance, available at http://data.worldbank.org/country/brazil.
b
Acronym, coined by an executive of an international large investment firm, of a
group of large and intensely populated emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India,
China, and South Africa. This group created in 2014 a US$ 40 billion capital jointly
managed Development Bank, apart from the Word Bank.
c
The City Prosperity Index takes into account five components: productivity, quality
of life, infrastructure, environment, and equity. Available at http://mirror.unhabitat.org/
pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=3387.
d
A science park is an organization managed by specialized professionals, whose main
aim is to increase the wealth of its community by promoting the culture of innovation
and the competitiveness of its associated businesses and knowledge-based institutions.
To enable these goals to be met, a Science Park stimulates and manages the flow of
knowledge and technology among universities, R&D institutions, companies and mar-
kets; it facilitates the creation and growth of innovation-based companies through incu-
bation and spin-off processes; and provides other value-added services together with
high quality space and facilities’ (IASP 2014).
e
ANPROTEC - Brazilian Association of Science Parks and Business Incubators has
approximately 280 members, including business incubators, STPs, education and re-
search institutions, government bodies, and other entities focused on entrepreneurship
and innovation.
f
Social organization’ is a public-private partnership model created by law in the mid-
1990s, allowing private non-for-profit organizations to manage public assets and use them
to provide services to society deemed relevant. The relation between the parties is regu-
lated by a multi-year management contract that establishes clear and measurable objec-
tives for the private organization and defines the funds that government will transfer to
cover most of the costs involved. Received initially by the now ruling Workers’ Party, then
in the opposition, as a tool to destroy public service, the institutional innovation neverthe-
less flourished in the areas of health, culture, and science/technology.
Additional file
Author details
1
Center for Technology Policy and Management, University of São Paulo, 908 Professor Luciano Gualberto Av., Room
B114, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil. 2Nuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3School of
Economics, Business and Accounting, University of São Paulo, 908 Professor Luciano Gualberto Av., Room B114, São
Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil. 4School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, 908 Professor Luciano Gualberto Av., Room
B114, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.
References
Allen J (2007) Third generation science parks. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester Science Park Ltd. 20 p. ISBN 0954908414,
9780954908416.
ANPROTEC (2008) Parques Tecnológicos no Brasil: Estudos, Análise e Proposições. Available at: http://
www.anprotec.org.br/ArquivosDin/estudo-parques_pdf_16.pdf (in Portuguese)
Barcelona Urban Lab (2014). Available at http://www.22barcelona.com/content/view/698/897/lang,en/
BATTELLE (2007) Characteristics and trends in North American research parks: 21st century directions. Prepared by
Battelle Technology Partnership Practice; developed in cooperation with Association of University Research Parks
(AURP). Available at http://www.aurp.net/assets/documents/FinalBattelle.pdf
Bouchardet RLS (org.) (2012) Parques Tecnológicos. plataformas para articulação e fomento ao desenvolvimento
regional sustentável. 1. Ed. Brasília, Brazil, ANPROTEC/SEBRAE. ISBN: 978-85-87196-09-5
Castells M (1992) Génesis y estrutura de los médios de innovación tecnológica industrial: um análisis comparado”,
Quaderns de la Tecnologia, Innovación, Cultura, Societat. Instituto Catalán de Tecnologia. Cited by Ondategui, J. C.
(2001). Los Parques Científicos y Tecnológicos en España: retos y oportunidades. Madrid, España, Dirección General
de Investigación de la Comunidad de Madrid. ISBN: 84-451-1954-0
CDT/UnB (2013) Estudo de Projetos de Alta Complexidade: indicadores de parques tecnológicos. Study made for the
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Brasilia, Brazil. Available in http://www.mct.gov.br/upd_blob/0228/
228606.pdf
Gargione LA (2011) Um modelo para financiamento de parques tecnológicos no Brasil: explorando o potencial dos
fundos de investimento. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Doctoral dissertation, Available at http://
www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/3/3136/tde-12082011-110544/pt-br.php
Hauser G, Hoppe D, Padrão FM (2005) Parques Tecnológicos como instrumentos de requalificação urbana de áreas
degradadas. In: Hauser G, Zen A C. (org) Tecnopole o desafio da sinergia. Nova Prova Editora, Porto Alegre, Brazil,
pp 51–69
IASP (2014) International Association of Science Parks Official Definition for Science Parks., Available at
http://www.iasp.ws/knowledge-bites
Lapa T, Melo R (2007) Interventions in historic areas, mobility and urban conservation: the case study of Bairro do
Recife District. City & Time 2 (3): 4. [online] URL. http://www.ct.ceci-br.org/ceci/br/publicacoes/livros.html
Martine, G, McGranahan G (2010) Brazil’s early urban transition: what can it teach urbanizing countries. International
Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). ISBN: 978-1-
84369-776-3. Available at http://pubs.iied.org/10585IIED.html
Martins M (1997) Vantagens ambientais e competitivas das empresas: o papel dos parques tecnológicos. In: Guedes M,
Formica P (ed.) A Economia dos Parques Tecnológicos. Brasilia, Brazil:ANPROTEC. ISBN 85-85696-14-1
Ondategui JC (2001) Los Parques Científicos y Tecnológicos en España: retos y oportunidades. Diréccion General de
Investigación de la Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, España. ISBN 84-451-1954-0
Sanz L (2001) From technology parks to learning villages - a technology park model for the global society. XVIII IASP
World Conference on Science Parks, Bilbao, Spain, Available at http://www.docstoc.com/docs/116960996/FROM-
SCIENCE-PARK-TOLEARNING-VILLAGES
Silva PC, Silva NMP (2006) Poblenou: território@ de Barcelona: projeto 22@-BCN estudo e considerações. Itu (SP):
Ottoni Ed., ISBN: 85-7464-235-5
Zouain DM (2003) Parques Tecnológicos – propondo um modelo conceitual para regiões urbanas – o Parque
Tecnológico de São Paulo. Doctoral dissertation. Institute for Energy and Nuclear Research-University of Sao Paulo,
Sao Paulo, Brazil, Available at http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/85/85131/tde-27032014-134435/pt-br.php
Zouain DM, Plonski GA (2002) Technology Park of São Paulo – building up a model to metropolitan regions of São
Paulo State. In 11th IAMOT Conference. Proceedings. March 10–14. Miami Beach, Florida, USA
Zouain DM, Damião D, Catharino M (2007) The Science and Technology Parks as instruments of public policies for
promote the collaboration of technology based companies. PICMET 2007, Portland, OR, USA: IEEE, E-ISBN:
978-1-8908-4315-1, Print ISBN: 978-1-8908-4315-1, DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349348
Zouain DM, Plonski GA (2006) Parques tecnologicos – planejamento e gestao. 1 ed. Brasilia, Brazil:ANPROTEC. SEBRAE,
v.1, 140 p. ISBN 85-88397-13-7
Zouain DM, Plonski GA, Damião D (2014) Improving the technology parks planning process in São Paulo State-Brazil.
In 23rd IAMOT 2014 Proceedings. Washington DC, USA, ISBN: 0-9815817-7-3