Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BLJ/21
English-II
Paper Code: 201
Time: 2 Hrs.
Total Marks: 60
Section B, C, D & E shall have two questions from each module. The
student shall attempt one question from each section. Each question
shall be of 10 marks. The word limit would be 250-300 words per
answer.
SECTION: A
a) What are modal verbs of possibility and probability in English language. Give one
example of each.
b) What is Received Pronunciation? How many vowel and consonant sounds are
there as per RP?
c) Write a dialogue between a two fellow students on the problems being faced by
new comers in the university.
d) What were the reasons the postmaster felt like a fish out of pond after his posting
in the village?
SECTION: B
SECTION: C
Q.3. Transcribe any ten of the following words and mark the primary stress:
police, student, college, true, second, forty, decision, boat, question, lawyer,
judgment, university, cricket, houses, tomato, August, pictures, sentence,
present(noun and verb)
SECTION: D
Q.4. Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow:
In many countries the legal systems are very complex. This is because they have been developed
over very long times. Every time that a new case is decided it can have an affect on future cases.
This means that the people who work in legal situations have to be clever. They have to know
and understand all the rules and precedents. A precedent is when a previous decision will have
an effect on future cases as it was related to an important point.
There are many people who work with the law, such as solicitors or judges. A solicitor is a
lawyer who spends most of their time advising their clients and preparing legal documents, such
as wills or contracts for buying and selling houses. They need to be very careful and make sure
that all the details are correct, otherwise their clients might lose a lot of money.
A barrister is a type of lawyer who works in court rooms. They will either work for the
prosecution or defense sides. If they are a prosecution lawyer they are trying to prove that the
defendant (the person on trial) committed a crime. They have to present evidence to show that
the defendant is guilty. If they are a defense lawyer then they work for the defendant and have to
show that the evidence presented is not enough to prove that their client is guilty and he should
be judged to be not guilty.
Then there are judges and magistrates. A magistrate will hear trials about less serious crimes,
while a judge’s will be about more serious crimes. These are the people who have to decide what
punishment will be given to someone who is guilty. The punishments could range from a small
fine up to a long prison sentence, and even a death sentence in some countries. The trial happens
in the judge’s courtroom, so the judge is responsible for making sure the trial is run fairly and
follows the law.
If a lawyer believes that a trial was not fair or there was a mistake in the law, they can ask for a
new trial that will generally be hear by an appeal court where an appeal judge will be in charge.
Often appeal judges will be the most experienced judges in a country, so they know a lot about
the law and how to apply it.
As per Hindu law’s convention, the senior most male member is generally the Karta of the joint
family. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has stated that the Karta does not owe his position to
agreement or consent of other coparceners. His status has been a part of Hindu Culture for long.
As long as he is alive, irrespective of his age, health or strength, he continues to be Karta.
A conflict arises when in the presence of a senior male member can a junior male member be the
Karta? The position of law decided on this is that if all the coparceners agree, then a junior male
member can be a Karta. Though, this is contingent upon the whims and fancies of the
coparceners who may withdraw their consent at any time.
The Mitakshara School sets a position of law, that on marriage the wife entails ownership rights
to her husband’s separate and joint family property. Similarly, a daughter garners this right at
birth. The contingency to this being that there is a distinction between males and females.
Mitakshara law sets the status of women as bound to the family or asvatantra. Thus, their rights
can be entailed only while they belong to the family.
The Hindu Joint Family Setup has since time immemorial been criticised for being a patriarchal
setup. Thus, even the “manager” of a Joint Hindu Family has not been spared from this
patriarchal approach. The position of law qua the status of women as the Karta has been
inconclusive. Women, per courts, have been allowed as the Karta as a last resort. She may be a
widow who takes over in the absence of adult male members in the family. The court though
does not delve into what could this absence mean? The true test as per the court is not who
transferred/incurred the liability, but whether the transaction was necessary. The courts though
have rejected the notion of a widow as a coparcener for the want of a legal qualification to
become a manger of a JHF. The mother then may be the Karta as the natural guardian of minor
male members. She can also, represent the HUF for the purpose of assessment and recovery of
income tax. After refreshing through the authorities it was held that the mother or any other
female could not be the Karta of the Joint Family. Per the interpretation of the Court Hindu Law
allows only a coparcener as a Karta and since females cannot be coparceners, they cannot be the
Karta.
Dharmashastras are the one and only sure guide. The Dharmashastras give recognition to two of
the above decisions. The status of female members qua debts incurred as the Karta will be
binding upon the family and must be paid out of the joint family funds. Thus, it may be
submitted that there does exist a certain sense of gender neutrality. Dharmashastras also mandate
her acts as manager by accepting positive benefits as well and not merely conservative/negative
acts. Thereby, the texts mandate her judgement as the Karta.
Section E
Q.7. Discuss the philosophical significance of the poem “A Hindu to His Body” by
Ramanujan.