Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/51052187
CITATIONS READS
15 313
4 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by A. Gabriela de Luna on 14 April 2016.
Maria Clara Diaz a, c
Key Words
Ateles hybridus ⴢ Camera traps ⴢ Mineral lick ⴢ Soil consumption ⴢ Spider monkeys
Abstract
Spider monkeys and howler monkeys are the only Neotropical primates that eat
soil from mineral licks. Not all species within these genera visit mineral licks, and ge-
ophagy has been restricted to populations of Ateles belzebuth belzebuth, Ateles belzebuth
chamek and Alouatta seniculus in western Amazonian rainforests. With the aid of a cam-
era trap we studied the visitation patterns of a group of brown spider monkeys (Ateles
hybridus) to a mineral lick at Serrania de Las Quinchas, in Colombia. Spider monkeys vis-
ited the lick frequently throughout the year, with a monthly average of 21.7 8 7.2 visits
per 100 days of camera trapping (n = 14 months). Spider monkeys visited the mineral
lick almost always on days with no rain, or very little (!3 mm) rain, suggesting that prox-
imate environmental variables might determine spider monkeys’ decisions to come to
the ground at the licks. This study expands the geographical occurrence of mineral lick
use by spider monkeys providing additional data for future assessments on the biogeo-
graphical correlates of mineral lick use by platyrrhines. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
Introduction
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
07 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 09
Days sampled 15 30 28 29 30 31 20 30 31 26 30 30 30 19
Spider monkey visits 4 7 4 2 7 8 5 5 3 6 7 9 9 5
Methods
This research took place at the Private Reserve ‘El Paujil’ (06°02ⴕ48ⴕⴕ N, 74°16ⴕ00ⴕⴕ W)
from Fundación ProAves, in the Serrania de Las Quinchas, a small mountain chain in the west-
ern slopes of the Eastern Andes in Colombia. Serrania de Las Quinchas is one of the largest
Inter-Andean lowland forests on the eastern bank of the Magdalena River. Annual rainfall av-
erages 3,544 8 336 mm (2006–2008) and temperature is relatively constant throughout the year
with minimum and maximum daily average temperatures of 24.5 and 32.0 ° C, respectively. The
study site contains a mixture of rainforest and recently formed pastures. It comprises a forest
fragment of ca. 80 ha that connected to a larger forested area during the study through several
‘canopy bridges’. Our main study group of brown spider monkeys has been habituated and stud-
ied since January 2006. This group visits a single mineral lick which consists of a cliff wall about
30 m high, located next to a dirt road that was built over 10 years ago. The primates access the
lick by descending the trees at the top of the cliff.
During 13 months (December 14, 2007 through January 20, 2009), we monitored the min-
eral lick using one camera trap (CuddeBack Excite쏐) aimed at the base of the only tree where
primates could access the mineral lick. The camera was set to take a picture every minute
(the shortest available time interval between pictures) upon detecting movement. This allowed
us to record mineral lick visits even if we were not following the group. We collected daily data
on rainfall at 6:00 and 18:00 using a rain gauge and the daily temperature through a wall ther-
mometer.
We assessed the frequency of spider monkey visits to the mineral lick by counting all in-
dependent visits for those months in which the camera was working continuously, and esti-
mated the frequency of visitation on those months when the camera was not working for 11 day.
Expected visitation rates were calculated by multiplying the number of visits in each month by
the quotient between the days the trap was working in a month and the total number of days in
that particular month. Sampling effort is described in table 1. We defined independent visits as
visits that occurred in periods greater than 3 h, based on preliminary data on the time of vigi-
lance displayed by spider monkey groups around mineral licks prior to coming down to the
ground at several sites in Colombia and Ecuador [Link and Di Fiore, 2009].
Results
During 379 days of salt lick monitoring, our main study group of brown spider
monkeys visited the mineral lick on 81 occasions. On 5 days, spider monkeys came
twice to the mineral lick, thus visiting the lick on a total of 76 days. These data include
only the times when primates came down to the ground and ate soil, as spider mon-
keys sometimes came to the mineral lick area but left prior to eating soil [Link, un-
publ. data]. Thus the rates presented in this article refer to the successful visitation
of mineral licks where at least one spider monkey consumed soil from the ground.
30 600
25 500
Visits/100 days
Rain (mm)
20 400
15 300
10 200
5 100
0 0
Jan 08
Feb 08
Mar 08
Apr 08
May 08
Jun 08
Jul 08
Aug 08
Sep 08
Oct 08
Nov 08
Jan 09
Dec 07
Dec 08
Fig. 1. Monthly frequency of mineral lick visitation by brown spider monkeys (bars) and month-
ly rainfall (line) at Las Quinchas during the study period.
8
6
4
2
0
6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00
25
20
15
Visits
10
0
1
2–10
11–20
21–30
31–40
41–50
51–60
61–70
71–80
81–90
91–100
101–110
>110
Duration (min)
Spider monkeys visited the lick during dry days (!3 mm) more often than ex-
pected by chance (Yates’ 2 = 3.926, d.f. = 1, p = 0.047, n = 363 days). There was a
tendency for spider monkeys to visit the mineral licks on days with no rain as 98%
(72 out of 74) of visits took place on days with !3 mm of rain, and 80% of the days
had no rain at all. Only 2 visits (2.7%) took place on days when there was substantial
rain, even though we could not determine if this rain occurred after mineral lick
visitations as rain gauge records cover 12-hour periods (6:00 to 18:00).
The results of this study suggest that mineral licks are important sites for some
populations of brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus) as they visit them frequent-
ly throughout the year. It is still uncertain if geophagy is providing brown spider
monkeys with supplementary minerals, and/or aiding detoxification. Nevertheless,
it is evident that soil is a regular resource in the brown spider monkeys’ diet, which
at the study site is non-seasonal having only minor variation, with fruits comprising
on average 93.4 8 6.7% (n = 27 months) of their monthly diets [Link et al., unpubl.
data]. The importance of mineral licks for spider monkeys and howler monkeys has
also been suggested in previous studies at Tinigua Park, Colombia [Izawa, 1993;
Inaba, 2000; Shimooka, 2005], and ongoing studies at Yasuni Park, Ecuador [Blake
et al., 2010; Link et al., 2011], where both species frequently visited mineral licks
throughout the year [Izawa, 1993; Inaba, 2000]. Shimooka [2005] also suggested that
mineral licks influenced the ranging behaviour of spider monkeys, and Spehar et
al. [2010] and Link et al. [2011] found that the area around mineral licks was the
most frequent and intensively used area for groups of spider monkeys in eastern
Ecuador.
Consistent with the observations of environmental correlates of mineral lick use
by parrots at Tambopata, Peru [Brightsmith, 2004], and by howler monkeys and spi-
der monkeys at Tiputini Biological Station in Ecuador [Link et al., 2011], brown spi-
der monkeys also visited the mineral licks on days without rain or adverse weather
conditions. Brightsmith [2004] observed that birds would visit mineral licks on 94%
of mornings that were sunny. When weather was ‘inclement’, there was a significant
reduction in the percentage of mornings with birds visiting suggesting that rain re-
duced bird visits to mineral licks.
For arboreal primates, mineral licks are areas with a relatively higher risk of
predation from terrestrial predators. Izawa [1993] suggested that the selection of
mineral licks by spider monkeys and howler monkeys could be influenced by their
sense of predation risk. Although infrequent, indirect and direct evidence of preda-
tion of howler monkeys and spider monkeys by pumas (Puma concolor) and jaguars
(Panthera onca) exists [Ferrari, 2009]. In fact, Matsuda and Izawa [2008] observed
predation of a spider monkey on the forest floor by a jaguar and another attempt of
predation of a spider monkey by a puma at one of the mineral licks used by them.
This evidence suggests that at least for large arboreal primates, mineral lick visitation
is influenced by environmental and climatological conditions, as they might in turn
influence the probability of detecting a predator on the forest ground [Link et al.,
2011].
If predation is a major factor influencing the decisions of spider monkeys to
come down to the ground to eat soil, it could be hypothesized that, in general, spider
monkeys would come down to the salt lick in, on average, larger groups than the av-
erage size of foraging or travelling subgroups. This seems to be the case for popula-
tions of spider monkeys living in pristine ecosystems that have high densities of large
felids [Link and Di Fiore, 2009]. From the results obtained in our study, it is impor-
tant to take into account that the high percentage of visits when small subgroups of
spider monkeys came to the ground could reflect the fact that the mineral lick used
by our study group is located adjacent to a road and thus exposed to humans, a more
influential predator of brown spider monkeys in this area in the recent past.
Acknowledgments
We thank all our students and assistants who collaborated with us in the field. Erin Flem-
ing, Lindsey Smith and two anonymous reviewers improved earlier versions of the manuscript.
Fundación ProAves provided us with logistic support and collaboration to conduct our long-
term study on brown spider monkeys and the primate community at their private reserve ‘El
Paujil’. We specially thank Eliana Machado, and Euripides Montero for their kind support in
the field. Fundación Biodiversa Colombia provided us with institutional support during this
project, and we specially thank Alba Lucia Morales. This project was made possible thanks to
the grants provided by Idea Wild, Primate Conservation Inc., Primate Action Fund (Conserva-
tion International) and Rufford Small Grants Foundation for the conservation of Ateles hybri-
dus in Colombia.
References
Aureli F, Schaffner CM (2008). Social interactions, social relationships and the social system of spider
monkeys. In Spider Monkeys: Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of the Genus Ateles (Campbell CJ,
ed.), pp 236–265. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Ayres JM, Ayres CM (1979). Aspectos da caça no alto Rio Aripuanã. Acta Amazonica 9: 287–298.
Blake JG, Guerra J, Mosquera D, Torres R, Loiselle BA, Romo D (2010). Use of mineral licks by white-
bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth) and red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in eastern
Ecuador. International Journal of Primatology 31: 471–483.
Brightsmith DJ (2004). Effects of weather on parrot geophagy at Tambopata, Peru. The Wilson Bulletin
116: 134–145.
Brightsmith DJ, Muñoz-Najar RA (2004). Avian geophagy and soil characteristics in southeastern Peru.
Biotropica 36: 534–543.
Brightsmith DJ, Taylor J, Phillips OL (2008). The roles of soil characteristics and toxin adsorption in
avian geophagy. Biotropica 40: 766–774.
Campbell CJ, Aureli F, Chapman CA, Ramos-Fernandez G, Matthews K, Russo SE, Suarez S, Vick L
(2005). Terrestrial behavior of Ateles sp. International Journal of Primatology 26: 1039–1051.
Di Fiore A, Link A, Campbell CJ (2011). The atelines: Behavioral and socioecological diversity in a New
World radiation. In Primates in Perspective (Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Panger M,
Bearder SK, eds.), 2nd ed. New York, Oxford University Press.
Di Fiore A, Link A, Dew JL (2008). Diets of wild spider monkeys. In Spider Monkeys: Behavior, Ecology
and Evolution of the Genus Ateles (Campbell CJ, ed.), pp 81–137. Cambridge, Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
Emmons LH, Starck NM (1979). Element composition of a natural mineral lick in Amazonia. Biotro-
pica 11: 311–313.
Ferrari FF (2009). Predation risk and antipredator strategies. In South American Primates: Comparative
Perspectives in the Study of Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation (Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-
Marques JC, Heymann EW, Strier KB, eds.), pp 211–250. New York, Springer.
Ferrari FF, Veiga LM, Urbani B (2008). Geophagy in New World monkeys (Platyrrhini): ecological and
geographic patterns. Folia Primatologica 79: 402–415.