WP 51929-2014 and Connected Matters - Arkavathy Layout

1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
W.P. NO.51929/2014
C/W
W.P.NOS.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014,
797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014,
10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014,
13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014,
13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014,
14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014,
17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014,
23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014,
33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014,
34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014,
35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014,
36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014,
37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014,
38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014,
39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014,
41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014,
41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014,
44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014,
46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014,
47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014,
47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014,
49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014,
51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014,
53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014,
2
54358/2014, 54725/2014, 55081/2014, 55082/2014,

55083/2014, 55436/2014, 55671/2014, 56203/2014,
56300/2014, 56350/2014, 56646/2014, 56748/2014,
57076/2014, 57117/2014, 57150/2014, 57605/2014,
57606/2014, 58859/2014, 59794/2014, 60012/2014,
622/2015, 685/2015, 1958/2015, 2462/2015, 4591/2015,
5228/2015, 5664/2015, 6735/2015, 6981/2015, 7248/2015,
7277/2015, 7326/2015, 8277/2015, 8278/2015, 9135/2015,
9278/2015, 9488/2015, 9576/2015, 10923/2015,
11344/2015, 13201/2015, 14944/2015, 17240/2015,
18814/2015, 19213/2015, 20191/2015, 24417/2015,
24418/2015, 28143/2015, 28673/2015, 28676/2015,
28679/2015, 29317/2015, 29541/2015, 30781/2015,
31794/2015, 32423/2015, 33127/2015, 33128/2015,
33131/2015, 33133/2015, 33134/2015, 33137/2015,
35055/2015, 35464/2015, 35465/2015, 35842/2015,
37412/2015, 40838/2015, 44088/2015, 45662/2015,
47015/2015, 47820/2015, 47821/2015, 47822/2015,
47823/2015, 47824/2015, 47825/2015, 47826/2015,
47827/2015, 49842/2015, 49843/2015, 56271/2015,
57432/2015, 57434/2015, 57438/2015, 57439/2015,
57992/2015, 59004/2015, 59486/2015, 59492/2015,
59495/2015, 742/2016, 751/2016, 2392/2016, 2397/2016,
2915/2016, 5417/2016, 5446/2016, 5448/2016, 6717/2016,
6718/2016, 10318/2016, 11295/2016, 11493/2016,
11844/2016, 11846/2016, 12010/2016, 12674/2016,
13637/2016, 14280/2016, 14649/2016, 14650/2016,
15833/2016, 19019/2016, 19020/2016, 23623/2016,
23643/2016, 23656/2016, 24322/2016, 24676/2016,
24919/2016, 25131/2016, 25132/2016, 30680/2016,
33181/2016, 33196/2016, 33279/2016, 33385/2016,
3
34348/2016, 35687/2016, 35851/2016, 36525/2016,

37682/2016, 38430/2016, 38919/2016, 39001/2016,
40151/2016, 40240/2016, 41753/2016, 44127/2016,
44146/2016, 44246/2016, 46319/2016, 47314/2016,
47461/2016, 51143/2016, 51144/2016, 51145/2016,
51147/2016, 51352/2016, 51353/2016, 51355/2016,
51597/2016, 51707/2016, 51730/2016, 51875/2016,
51876/2016, 51877/2016, 51878/2016, 52141/2016,
52142/2016, 52928/2016, 53240/2016, 53525/2016,
53526/2016, 53527/2016, 53670/2016, 54364/2016,
54790/2016, 55126/2016,55667/2016, 55737/2016,
56022/2016, 56023/2016, 56971/2016, 56972/2016,
57149/2016, 57151/2016, 57709/2016, 57937/2016,
58218/2016, 58222/2016, 58734/2016, 59166/2016,
59168/2016, 59317/2016, 59793/2016, 60064/2016,
63172/2016, 63308/2016, 64534/2016, 64705/2016,
65118/2016, 65121/2016, 182/2017, 815/2017, 2066/2017,
3178/2017, 4293/2017, 4400/2017, 4511/2017, 5036/2017,
5037/2017, 5073/2017, 5207/2017, 5208/2017, 5213/2017,
5214/2017, 5218/2017, 5221/2017, 5301/2017, 5593/2017,
5936/2017, 6637/2017, 6998/2017, 6999/2017, 7000/2017,
7001/2017, 10503/2017, 10504/2017, 11782/2017,
12547/2017, 13456/2017, 14238/2017, 14626/2017,
14627/2017, 14628/2017, 14629/2017, 14630/2017,
14631/2017, 14632/2017, 14670/2017, 14868/2017,
15038/2017, 15588/2017, 18427/2017, 21361/2017,
24061/2017, 24065/2017, 24506/2017, 24508/2017,
24509/2017, 25120/2017, 26455/2017, 26456/2017,
26457/2017, 26458/2017, 28359/2017, 30485/2017,
31268/2017, 33191/2017, 35344/2017, 37044/2017,
40596/2017, 42836/2017, 43194/2017,
4
43207/2017, 45953/2017, 46333/2017, 46766/2017,

47823/2017, 47854/2017, 49031/2017, 50540/2017,
53428/2017, 54064/2017, 54863/2017, 55316/2017,
55317/2017, 56035/2017, 3157/2018, 3523/2018,
5448/2018, 8731/2018, 9190/2018, 12221/2018,
12792/2018, 25302/2018, 26667/2018, 27750/2018,
27947/2018, 30106/2018, 38977/2018, 39615/2018,
48266/2018, 53051/2018, 53250/2018, 56686/2018,
2939/2019, 8325/2019, 8329/2019, 12093/2019 15096/2019,
15199/2019, 15531/2019, 15532/2019, 15534/2019,
26852/2019, 50257/2019,
W.P.NOS. 10568/2015, 15003/2013, 14874/2014,
27833/2014, 42498/2014, 45230/2014, 47606/2014,
47607/2014, 58829/2014, 2935/2015, 2936/2015,
2937/2015, 6225/2015, 7038/2015, 7322/2015, 8111/2015,
8112/2015, 19086/2015, 21999/2015, 28675/2015,
34826/2015, 59793/2015, 1876/2016, 8603/2016,
8707/2016, 16505/2016, 20131/2016, 20132/2016,
34947/2016, 35309/2016, 39427/2016, 47965/2016,
51142/2016, 55666/2016, 57150/2016, 57245/2016,
58220/2016, 58223/2016, 58362/2016, 59167/2016,
59169/2016, 61955/2016, 63205/2016, 2531/2017,
5209/2017, 5212/2017, 37478/2017, 37480/2017 AND
19783/2018 (LA-BDA)
IN W.P.NO.51929/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. K.P.ANJANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
S/O. LATE K. PUTTAIAH
R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
5
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O.T.V.KRISHNAMURTHY
R/AT NO.22, NEW BEL ROAD,
I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-95
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND
SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 20
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNEX-D.
IN W.P.NO.42063/2012:
BETWEEN:
1. K.G.G. NAYAR
S/O SRI GOPALA PILLAI
6
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

R/AT NO.2, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT
4TH BLOCK, SHIVARAMAKARANTHNAGAR
POST, THANISANDRA,
BANGALORE-560 077
2. M P MUNIRAJU
S/O SRI M. PUTTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO 8, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
SHAMMANNA GOWDA LAYOUT,
SARASWATHIPURA, ULSOOR,
BANGALORE 560 008
3. NAGARAJU H L
S/O SRI LINGAIAH H.B.
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
R/AT NO 660, 4TH MAIN,
NEAR MADHU BAR BUILDING,
PIPELINE, SRINAGAR,
BANGALORE 560 050
4. N ASHOKARAJU
S/O SRI N LAKSHMANARAJU
R/AT NO 2, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
JALADARSHINI LAYOUT,
NEW BEL ROAD,
BANGALORE 560 094
5. K V RAMESH
S/O SRI K S VENKATASUBBAIAH
AGEDA BOUT 56 YEARS
R/A NO.114, GELLI APARTMENT,
47TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR
8TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 082
6. KOTHANDARAMA R
S/O SRI R.S.RADHAKRISHNA
R/AT NO.129, JEWELLERS' STREET,
BANGALORE 560 001
7. T KALAISELVAN
S/O SRI G THANGAVELU
7
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

R/AT NO 102, 3RD CROSS,
5TH MAIN, BYATARAYANAPURA
NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE 560 026
8. ASHWATHANARAYANACHAR
S/O SRI VEERABHADRACHAR
R/AT NO 101, 3RD A MAIN,
SOMESHWARANAGAR, C.B. SANDRA,
GKVK POST, BANGALORE 560 065
9. M V NARASIMHAPRASAD
S/O M N VASUDEVA RAO
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/AT NO 314, 12TH A MAIN,
6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALROE 560 010
10. C SREEDHARAN
S/O SRI N RARUKUTTI
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
R/AT NO G 1, GROUND FLOOR,
OM SAI, S V CROWN APARTMENTS,
NO 183, A3, 6TH G CROSS,
KAGGADASAPURA, C V RAMAN
NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560 093
11. B L RAMAMURTHY
S/O SRI B N LINGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO M 65, MARKET ROAD,
7TH CROSS ROAD, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA,
NAGAPPA BLOCK, BANGALORE 560 021
12. MANOHARAN K
S/O SRI K KANDASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO 81, I CROSS, 4TH MAIN,
PADMANABHANAGAR,
BANGALORE 560 070
13. NARAYANASETTY
S/O SRI LAKSHMASETTY
8
AICOBOONAGAR, BTM I STAGE,

BANGALORE 560 068
14. N SHANKARACHAR
S/O SRI NANJUNDACHAR
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/AT NO 530/3, 13TH A CROSS,
11TH A MAIN ROAD, SECTOR A,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE 560 064
15. L RAMESH
S/O SRI LINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.455,
8TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS ROAD,
VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040
16. SMT DEEPTI M SHAH

W/O SRI SYED MAQSOOD SHAH
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.D3,
801, BDA FLAT, AUSTIN TOWN LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560 047
17. CHANDRARAO S
S/O SRI SUBBARO B
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/A NO.120, 1ST CROSS ROAD,
GORAKAMANTHANAPALYA,
BYRASANDRA MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA POST,
BANGALORE-560 075
18. S.V. SUNDARARAJAN

S/O SRI S VISWANATHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
R/A NO.8/13, 4TH D CROSS,
MADIWALA EXTENSION,
MARUTHINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 068
19. P.K. DESHPANDE
S/O SRI K DESHPANDE
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/A NO.393, 6TH MAIN,
9
3RD BLOCK, BEL LAYOUT,

VIDHYARANYAPURA,
BANGALORE-560 097
20. SANDEEP S
S/O SRI SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/A NO.E-49/3, DRDO TOWNSHIP,
C.V. RAMAN NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 083
21. B.R. MURALIDHAR

S/O SRI V RANGAIAH
RESIDING AT NO.395,
7TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK,
RAJAJINAGAR MILK COLONY POST,
NEAR VIVEKANANDA COLLEGE,
BANGALORE-560 055
22. G. SEENASWAMY
S/O SRI GUNDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/A NO.87, SRI MANJUNATHA NILAYA,
14TH CROSS, ULLAL ROAD,
MUNESHWARA NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 056
23. RAMESHA M.R.

S/O SRI M RAMAKRISHNAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.51/43,
22 MAIN ROAD, III CROSS,
BTS GARAGE BACKSIDE
VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040
24. SRIDHAR K C
S/O SRI K.V. KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/A NO.20, I MAIN, VAISHNAVI LAYOUT
VIDYARANYAPURA POST,
BANGALORE-560 097
25. SMT. RATHI POONACHA

W/O SRI K.K. POONACHA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/A NO. 69, 'ANUGRAHA',
10
2ND CROSS, 10TH MAIN,

BHUVANESHWARINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 032
26. C.S. NARAYANASWAMY

S/O SRI C.R. SHIVALINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/A NO.55, GREEN FIELDS-III,
DODDAKALLASANDRA,
KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 062
27. C M JOYAPPA
S/O SRI MEDAPPA C N
AGEDA BOUT 59 YEARS,
M. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD.
MAHADEVAPURA, WHITEFIELD ROAD
BANGALORE-48
28. K RAMANNA
S/O SRI KAATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/AT NO 868, 2ND E MAIN ROAD,
RAMAIAH LAYOUT, KACHARAKANAHALLI,
BANGALORE 560 084
29. L GOPINATHAN
S/O SRI LAKSHMINARAYANACHAR
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO 30, SUSHMA NIVAS,
APPA RAO LAYOUT, 2ND MAIN,
I CROSS, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR,
BANGALORE 560016
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C. G. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

K P WEST EXTENSION
T CHOWDIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE 560 020
REP BY ITS COMMISIONER
REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT
11
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE 560 001
3. A V RAVIPRAKASH
S/O SRI A VENKATARAM
R/AT NO 99, 4TH CROSS,
I BLOCK, JAYANAGAR EAST,
BANGALORE 560 011
4. A V SRIRAM
S/O SRI A VENKATARAM
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO 20, 2ND MAIN, I BLOCK
BANASHANKARI 3RD PHASE,
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE 560085. …RESPONDENTS
(SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR

BY B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2;
SRI. DEEPAK J, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OR
DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 3.10.2007 ISSUED BY R2 UNDER ANNX-G.
IN W.P.NO.30494/2013:
BETWEEN:
1. S. VENKATESH
S/O. SHANKAR REDDY
2. S.RAMESH REDDY
S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY
3. S.NAGARAJ REDDY
S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY,
12
4. S. SURENDRA REDDY
S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT

CHALLAKERE VILALGE,
RING ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P.KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560 001
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARPARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 001
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION

OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. B.V. SHANKARNARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE
AND SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. K. A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDROSEMENT DATED 25.2.2013 PRODUCED AT ANN-L.
IN W.P.NO.42671/2013:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SUBBAMMA
W/O. LATE SRI.B.RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
13
2. SRI.RAVI KUMAR R
S/O. LATE SRI.B.RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
BOTH R/A NO.80,

JAKKUR VILLAGE AND POST,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.R. VENKATESH MURTHY, ADVOCATE

AND SRI. S. NISCHAL, ADVOCATE)
AND:

REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA KRUPA WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
3. THE COMMISSIONER
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA KRUPA WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-A & B VIZ
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DT. 3.2.2003 & FINAL NOTIFICATION
DT.23.2.04.
IN W.P.NO.638/2014:
BETWEEN:
S.R. GOVINDAPPA
SINCE REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS
1(a). SMT.S.R.GAYATHRI
W/O. LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA,
14
NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE,

JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064
1(b). G.GAURAV
S/O.LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA,
BANGALORE-560 064
1(c). G.GAGAN
S/O.LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA,
(BY SRI. P. SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. H. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE - 560 001
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
(REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER)

AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS

SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN REPSECT OF SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF SY.NO.58/1 OF SRIRAMPURA
VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK VIDE
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATIOND ATED 3.2.2013 VIDE ANN-K AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.2.2004 VIDE ANN-L ARE
15
DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO

FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND
ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013.
IN W.P.NO.797/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.N.RAMAIAH
S/O. LATE NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD,
KAVERI SERVICE STATION,
KALYAN NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE - 560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION

OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
ENDORSEMENT DT. 5.11.2013 ISSUED BY R-3 VIDE ANNX-G.
16
IN W.P.NO.1089/2014:
BETWEEN:
MOHAN K.REDDY
S/O. LATE B.N.KAMALANABHA REDDY
R/A NO.176, GANDHI STREET,
KAMMANAHALLI,
BANGALORE - 560 084
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. PRASAD HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

NOTIFICATION DT. 3.2.2003 ISSUED U/S 17(1) & (3) OF THE BDA
ACT 1976 VIDE ANNX-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS LANDS
ARE CONCERNED AS THE SAME IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE
SCHEME OF THE BDA.
IN W.P.NO.3211/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT.DHANALAKSHMI
W/O. VENKATARAMU V
AGED 60 YEARS,
R/O NO.34, 3RD CROSS,
4TH MAIN ROAD,
SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR,
17
BANGALORE-560 027
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
DT.13.1.2012 VIDE ANNX-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT.
IN W.P.NO.3389/2014:
BETWEEN:
MR.JOKIM
S/O.SRI.ANNAYAPPA,
R/A NO.198, CHURCH BLOCK,
VISHWANATHANAGENAHALLI,
R.T.NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560 032
...PETITIONER
AND:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING &
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 016
18

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 053. …RESPONDENTS

BY SRI. A. LOKANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION
OF THE PETITIONER AS AT ANN-C.
IN W.P.NO.6180/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. G.SRINIVAS
S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA
R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,
DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR,
(ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE - 560 045
2. MUNEGOWDA
BANGALORE - 560 045
3. SRI. RAMAMURTHY
BANGALORE - 560 045.
4. VENKATESH
19

BANGALORE - 560 045. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. V.S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE - 560 001

KUMARAPARK WEST EXTENSION,
BANGALORE - 560 020
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

KUMARAPARK WEST EXTENSION,

SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

RESPONDENTS TO RE-DO THE EXERCISE OF DE-NOTIFYING THE
LAND IN SY.NO.81/1 EXTENT 2 ACRES OF PETITIONERS LAND
SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM, HOBLI
BANGALORE EAST TQ. PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION IN WP
NO.15286/06 DT. 20.11.2006.
IN W.P. NO.10356/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
S/O LATE NARASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
20
R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE

YELAHANKA HOBLI
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SADASHIVAIAH K.G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.S. BUILDING, DEPT. OF HOUSING
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
2. THE COMMISSIONER
AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK (WEST)

AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE REPORT
SUBMITTED BY THE R-3 DATED 29.12.2009 AND ISSUED TO THE
PETITIONER ON 07.12.2013 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
AS PER ANNX-Q.
IN W.P. NO.12014 /2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. TEJARAM
S/O RAMLAL
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.10, 2ND STREET
21
1ST CROSS, VENKATESHAPURA

MAIN ROAD, PILLANNA GARDEN
(BY SRI. UMESH B.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

BY ITS SECRETARY
MULTISTORIED BUILDING
3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITHY
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL

FOR B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2;
SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATION DATED
12.12.2005 VIDE ANN-C AND ALSO HIS CASE FOR DELETION OF
HIS PROPERTY IN SY. NO.44, PROPERTY NO.44, SITE NO.2,
KHATA NO.1150 SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.
PURAM HOBLI, NOW IN BANGALORE EAST TALUK, MEASURING
75 FT. X 23+27/2, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 1,875 SQ.FT.
ON THE DIRECTIONS OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND HON'BLE
SUPREME COURT.
IN W.P. NO.12015/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. ABDUL MAJEED
S/O HASSAIN SAHIB
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
22
R/AT: NO.35, LAL MASJID

A STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR
2. MUZAMIL PASHA
S/O ABDUL MAJEED
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT: NO. 35, LAL MASJID
A STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR
(BY SRI.V.SHIVA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020

BY ITS SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
MULTISOTIRED BUILDING

(BY SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3;
BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2)

RESPONDENTS TO DELET THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS
FROM ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS WHICH ARE NOTIFIED FOR
THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, I.E., 5 1/2 GUNTAS OF
LAND IN SYNO.42 AND 5 1/2 GUNTAS OF LAND IN SY.NO.43;
6723SQ. FEET OF LAND OF 1ST PETITIONER IN SY. NO.44; AND
6724 SQ. FEET OF LAND OF 2ND PETITIONER IN SY. NO.44; AND
THE ABOVE SAID SY NOS. BELONGING TO THANISANDRA
23
VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK AS

PER ANNX-D.
IN W.P. NO.13043/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. R. RAMACHANDRAN
S/O LATE N. RAMAKRISHNA IYER
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
2. SMT. PREMA RAMACHANDRAN

W/O R. RAMACHANDRAN
BOTH RESIDING AT NO. 1

4TH MAIN IST STAGE
MSH LAYOUT, ANANDNAGAR
(BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK
WEST, PALACE ROAD

WEST, PALACE ROAD
SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR
24
SRI.B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2;

SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-C AND VIZ
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED N THE KARNATAKA
GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR
AS VOID DOCUMENT.
IN W.P. NO.13045/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. REKHA BALAKRISHNAN

W/O N. BALAKRISHNAN
2. SRI. N. BALAKRISHNAN
S/O K. NARAYANAN
BOTH RESIDING AT NO.1

4TH MAIN, IST STAGE
ANANDNAGAR
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
AUTHORITYM KUMARA PARK
WEST, PALACE ROAD
25

WEST, PALACE ROAD
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-C AND D
VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE
KARNATAKA GAZETTE OF 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE
MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT.
IN W.P. NO.13206/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SAJAN K CHACKO

S/O K.J. CHACKO
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/A NO.12, 2ND MAIN ROAD
SULTHANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR
REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF

ATTORNEY HOLDER
MRS ANILA VARGHESE PHILIP
W/O SRI. SAJAN K. CHACKO
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
SULTHANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR
...PETITIONER
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING
26
BANGALORE - 560 001

REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
WEST, PALACE ROAD

KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-B AND C
IN W.P. NO.13207/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. VIJI PHILIP @ VARGHESE PHILIP

S/O V.K. PHILIP
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.12
2ND MAIN ROAD, SULTHANPALYA
R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032
PRESENTLY WORKING AT:
DOHA, QUATAR.
REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF

ATTORNEY HOLDER
MRS ANILA VARGHESE PHILIP
D/O SRI. GEORGE PHILIP
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.12
27
2ND MAIN ROAD, SULTHANPALYA

R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 003.

KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-B AND C
IN W.P. NO.13398/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MUNI KUPPANNA

S/O LATE GINGARAPPA
28
2. CHINNA THAYAPPA
S/O LATE GINGARAPPA
3. SRI. CHINNA VENKATAPPA
S/O LATE GINGARAPPA
4. SRI. M. MUNIYAPPA
S/O SRI MUNI VENKATAPPA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.30

SRIRAMPURA OLD VILLAGE
JAKKUR POST
(BY SRI. T. YUGANDHIR, ADVOCATE FOR P2 TO P4

SRI. J. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE
SMT. PRATHIBHA R.K., ADVOCATE
SRI. SANTHOSH S. NAGARALE, ADVOCATE FOR P4)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR
VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001.
AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA KRUPA ROAD
3. THE SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISTION OFFICER,
BDA BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 BDA TO
TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN RESPECT OF PETITIONERS LAND
BEARING SY. NO. 49/4 MEASURING 1.01 AG IN SRIRAMPURA
29
VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE PURSUANT TO THE

FINAL REPORT DATED 30.10.2013 VIDE ANN-F.
IN W.P NO.13774/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. MUNAWAR BURHAN

S/O LATE KHADER BURHAN
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO. 206, 19TH CROSS
1ST BLOCK, R T NAGAR
(BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND

ACQUISITION OFFICER

SRI.B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE R2 AND R3)

RESPONDENTS HAVE NO MANNER OF RIGHT, TITLE AND
INTEREST IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
30
IN W.P. NO.14149/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. N. RAMAIAH
S/O LATE SRI. NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/A NO.708, HENNUR MAIN ROAD
NEAR CAUVERY SERVICE STATION
KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE - 560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY.

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY IS ABANDONED OR LAPSED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE
DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DELETE/GIVE UP OR EXCLUDE
THE SCHEDULE PROPERLY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC.
31
IN W.P NO.14161/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT. REKHA SHARMA

W/O DEEPAK SHARMA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 109
ITI LAYOUT, BENSON TOWN,
BANGALORE-560 046
REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF

ATTORNEY HOLDER
MR.SRI. R. RAMACHANDRAN
S/O LATE N. RAMAKRISHNA IYER
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1
4TH MAIN, IST STAGE
MSH LAYOUT, ANANDNAGAR
BANGALORE-560 024.
...PETITIONER
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001
SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD
BANGALORE-560003

AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST
32
PALACE ROAD

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX-B & C VIZ
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATKA
GAZETE OF 03.02.2003 & FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 & CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR
AS VOID DOCUMENT.
IN W.P.NO.14494/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. RAJAMMA
WIFE OF D.M.MUNIKRISHNAPPA
2. SRI. KALLESH
SON OF D.M.MUNIKRISHNAPPA,
3. SMT. GOWRAMMA
WIFE OF PAPANNA,
4. SMT. KRISHNAMMA
WIFE OF CHOWDAPPA,
5. SRI. LINGARAJU
SON OF LATE CHENNAMMA,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI

VILLAGE, SAHAKARANAGARA POST,
BENGALURU. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHENNARAYA REDDY S., ADVOCATE)
AND:

SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
33
MULTISTORIED BUILDING,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020,
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS

SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS
RELATING TO ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS OF PRLIMINARY
NOTIFICATION ANNX-T DATED 03.02.2003 FINAL NOTIFICATION
AS PER ANNX-AC DATED 23.02.2004 & UNOFFICIAL NOTE DATED
12.11.2013 AT ANNX-D.
IN W.P NO.14502/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. ADINARAYANA M
S/O MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
RESIDING AT # 633
NEAR BALAJI KALYAN MANTAP
VMK ROAD, H A FARM POST
DASARAHALLI
BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONER

AND:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
34
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

BY ITS PRICIPAL SECRETARY
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
4. SRI SUBRAMANI
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
5. SRI KANDAPPA
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
6. SRI RAMESH
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
7. SRI LAKSHMANA
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7
ARE RESIDENTS OF SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 054. …RESPONDENTS

SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
JAYPEE ASSOCIATES FOR R5-R7
SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF R-4 TO 7
DATED 08.01.2005 VIDE ANNX-P.(II) QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT
35
ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO 7 DATED

31.05.2012 VIDE ANNX-T AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 14521/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI ANWAR PASHA

S/O LATE MUMTAZ HUSSAIN,
R/O.THNISANDRA, KRISHNA RAJAPURAM,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
SINCE DECEASED BY LRS:
1. SMT. JAMEELA BEGUM

W/O ANWAR PASHA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
2. SRI. IMRAN PASHA

S/O ANWAR PASHA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
3. SRI ANSAR PASHA

S/O ANWAR PASHA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
4. SRI. WASEEM PASHA
S/O ANWAR PASHA
ALL ARE R/AT NO.13,

3RD CROSS, HUDSON ROAD,
LINGARAJAPURAM
ST. THOMAN TOWN, BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU-560 084
KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SURESH S. LOKRE, ADVOCATE FOR P1 TO P4)
AND:
DEPT.OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
36

K.P.WEST BANGALORE-560020
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. I.G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & R-2 TO
CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATIONS DATED
10.03.2014 VIDE ANN-N, TO DENOTIFY THE PETITIONER'S LANDS
BEARING SY.NOS 85/1A, 85/1B, 85/1C AND 85/2 TOTALLY
MEASURING 2.38 ACRES, SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
KRISHNA RAJAPURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
IN W.P NO. 14689/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. S. SHANTHA KUMAR

S/O SANDHYAGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/AT NO. 60, CHOSAPPA LAAYOUT
VEERANNA PALYA
AREBIC COLLEGE POST
BANGALORE-560045
...PETITIONER
AND:

M S BUILDING
37
BANGALORE-560 001.

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE- 560 020
4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

BANGALORE CITY-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R4;


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 NOT
TO UNDERTAKE ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IN THE LAND OF
THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 16646/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNIVENKATAPPA
S/O JINGARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
2. SRI MUNISWAMY
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/O SRIRAMAPURA

JAKKUAR POST
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHIVANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY L.K., ADVOCATE)
38
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560 001
3. THE COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
4. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PASSED BY THE R-2 AND
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA OFFICIAL GAZETTE DATED
23.02.2004 IN PART-III NO.274, AS CONTAINED IN ANNEX-E, AS
FAR AS ITS RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
IN W.P NO. 17051/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
DR. HEMAVATHI HEGDE

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
W/O RAJ BALLAL
NO.25, SHANTHINIKETHAN APARTMENTS
39
SECTOR A, AMRUTHNAGAR
(BY SRI. RAJAGOPALAN R., ADVOCATE)
AND:

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-20
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE

OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO EXECUTE A LEASE CUM SALE DEED AND PUT
THE PETITIONER IN POSSESSION OF THE ALLOTED SITE
BEARING NO. 57, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BLOCK - XVI MEASURING
15 METERS X 24 METERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AT THE
EARLIEST AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 17594/ 2014:

BETWEEN:
SRI. SONNAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKAIAH,
R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK
NOTE: BENEFIT OF SENIOR
CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED. ...PETITIONER

AND:

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
40
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.

BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 DATED 28.03.2014 WHICH
IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-C AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 19729/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SHAILA PRABHU NEE SHEVGOOR

W/O SRI.SUDHIR R.PRABHU,
AGED 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.406, BLOCK I,
KRISHNA APARTMENTS,
ALI ASKER ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 052.
2. SMT. LATHA SHEVGOOR KAMATH

D/O SRI.G.K.SHEVGOOR,
AGED 46 YEARS,
REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER
AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
SMT.JAYANTHI SHEVGOOR,
RESIDING AT NO.502, BLOCK I,
KRISHNA APARTMENTS,
41
ALI ASKER ROAD,

BANGALORE-560052.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. N. RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDAH,
BANGALORE-560 001.

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. A. LOKANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE SCHEDULE LANDS BELONGING
TO THE PETITIONERS FROM ACQUISITION FOR ARKAVATHY
LAYOUT AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 21158/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
M/S PRAMOD MODERN

EDUCATION TRUST, (REGD.)
NO.33, CHALAKERE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANASWADI POST,
42
BANGALORE-560 043,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECRETARY,
V.VENKATARAMA REDDY
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING, BANGLAORE-560 001,
REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT BDA TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED
25.04.2014 VIDE ANNX-H AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 23897/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT K. S. VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O K.C. CHOWDE GOWDA,
RESIDING AT NO.19,
ANANDNAGAR EXTENSION,
SUMANGALI SEVA ASHRAMA ROAD,
43
CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI,
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.N. ASWATHANARAYAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S. BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

T. COWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020,
3. KARNATAKA STATE KHADI GRAMODYOGA

WORKERS HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETY LTD., NO.10,
JASMA BHAVAN ROAD,
(MILLERS TANK BUND ROAD),
BANGALORE, 560 052
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO FOR R2;
SRI. B. RUDRAGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

ENDORSEMENT DATED 27.01.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2-B.D.A.
ANNEX-M AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 28861/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNISWAMY
S/O ANJANAPPA,
R/A NO.63, SAMPIGEHALLI
44
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,

BANGALORE
2. SRI. GOVINDARAJU
S/O RAJANNA,
R/AT NO.1/3, SAMPIGEHALLI,
BANGALORE
3. SRI. NAGARAJU
S/O MUNI VENKATAPPA,
R/AT NO.30, SAMPIGEHALLI,
BANGALORE
4. SRI. VENKATASWAMY
S/O MUNIYAPPA,
R/A NO.31, SAMPIGEHALLI,
BANGALORE
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C. M. NAGABHUSHANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION,
BANGALORE-560 020
REPTD., BY ITS COMMISSIONER
45



CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRILIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R2 VIDE
ANNX-B AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 30731/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT. ERAMMA
W/O LATE BUDANNA,
R/A SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE,
MARAMMA TEMPLE,
JAKKUR POST,
YELAHANKA POST,
BANGALORE- 560 001. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V., ADVOCATE AND

SRI. R. HEMANTH RAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE 560 020.
2. THE ADDL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE 560 020.

REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
HOUSING AND
46

M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE 560 001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR

SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3)

DEVELOPMENT SCHEME PREPARED BY THE BDA FOR
FORMATION OF "ARKAVATI LAYOUT" HAS LAPSED AS
CONTEMPLATED U/S.27 OF THE BDA ACT 1976 & AS WELL AS
SUBSECTION(1) & (2) OF THE SECTION 25 OF RIGHT TO FAIR
COMPENSATION & TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION,
REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013 IN SO FAR AS THE
PETITIONERS SCHEDULE LANDS IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 31723/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MOHAMMED MUJAHID ALI

S/O MOHAMMED HYDER,
R/AT NO.52, GEDDALAHALLI,
VINAYAKANAGARA HOTHANUR POST,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK.- 560 077
2. SRI. SYED FAROOQULLA HUSSAINY

S/O SYED NOORULLA HUSSINY,
VINAYAKANAGARA,
KOTHANUR POST,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077
3. SRI. M. SIRAJ UDDIN

S/O LATE MUSTAFFA
VINAYAKANAGARA,
KOTHANUR POST,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK -560 077
47
4. SRI. ILYAS PASHA

S/O LATE ABDUL SUBHAN,
R/AT NO.35,
GEDDALAHALLI,
VINAYAKA NAGAR,
KOTHANUR POST,
5. SRI. SHAIK ASLAM

S/O AZEEZ,
R/AT NO. 14,
GEDDALAHALLI,
VINAYAKANAGAR,
KOTHANUR POST,
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE AND

SRI. P. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 002.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

ACQUISITION OF THE LAND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN
PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/SEC. 17(1) OF THE
BDA ACT 1976 VIDE NO. BDA/COMMR/ALAO /LA9/104/2002-03
DATED 03/02/2013 (ANNEXURE-A) AND NOTIFICATION ISSUED
48
U/SEC.19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE NO.UDD 193 MNX,

BANGALORE, DATED 23/02/2004 (ANNEXURE-B) ISSUED BY THE
SECOND RESPONDENT HAS LAPSED/ IS ABANDONED IN SO FAR
THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES IS CONCERNED AND
ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33774/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA
W/O LATE H. APPANNAGOWDA,
2. SRI H. KODANDARAMAIAH
S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA,
3. SMT. RAMAKKA
W/O H.SATHYANARAYANA,
ALL RESIDIENT OF K.NARAYANAPURA

K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077.
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20
49

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE
FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. G.LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. K.A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYAN RAO, ADVOCATE FOR
IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON )

NOTIFICATION DT: 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-G
AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33777/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNIANJANAPPA
W/O.LATE MUNINANJAPPA,
2. SRI RAMANNA
S/O.LATE MUNINANJAPPA,
3. SRI KRISHNAPPA,
S/O. MUNINANJAPPA,
ALL RESIDENTS OF SAMPIGEHALLI,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 064.
...PETITIONERS

50
AND;

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20
4. B. BYRANNA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O SRI. K.B. BYRANNA,
NO. 3016, 1ST FLOOR,
13TH MAIN, RPC, LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE-40
5. PRABHAKAR. S. SHENOY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O. SRI. SUNDAR SHENOY
NO. 28, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN,
3RD CROSS SARASWATHI NAGAR
VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE- 40
6. KANTHARAJU
S/O K.R. ISHWARAIAH
NO.14 ANNAPURNESHWARI NAGAR,
MUDALAPALYA, NEAR VIJAYANAGAR
EDUCATION SOCIETY
BANGALORE-72
7. K. RAJASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O SRI. KEMPEGOWDA
NO. 56, 9TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS,
14TH PHASE, 7TH BLOCK
51
GURURAJA LAYOUT ,
BSK 3RD STATE,
BENGALURU-85.
8. D. MANOHARAN
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O DURAISWAMY
NO.5, 4TH MAIN,
NEAR PALANI BUILDING
SWATANTRANAGAR
SRIRAMPURA
BANGALORE-21.
9. D. RAMESH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O LATE D. GUNDU RAO,
NO.38, 8TH 'B'MAIN
1ST CROSS , SRINIDHI LAYOUT
VIDYARANYAPURA
BANGALORE-97
10. P. CHANDRASHEKARAN
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O. S. RAMAMURTHY
NO.76, NANJAPPA LAYOUT
VIDYARANYAPURA
BANGALORE-97
11. HUSSAIN SAB KALIMIRCHI

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O CHANDU SAB
NO. 146, 4TH MAIN, 12TH CROSS
BEML LAYOUT, ITPL ROAD
THUBARAHALLI
BANGALORE-66
12. SMT. GIRIJA PRAKASH

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
W/O. H.N. SRINIVASA PRAKASH
NO. 18, PANCHAVATI APARTMENTS,
4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN,
SRIRAMPURA
BANGALORE-21
…RESPONDENTS
52
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;

SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR
PROPOSED RESPONDENTS)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-G AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 34084/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT KAMALAMMA
WIFE OF HANUMANTHAPPA,
GRAND DAUGHTER OF M.RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT: 49 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE,
RESIDING AT NO. 31, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE,
JAKKUR PANCHAYAT, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE -560064
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G.S. BHAT, ADVOCATE AND

SRI. N.K. KANTHARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE 560020

NORTH DIVISION, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE 560020
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX,
R.T. NAGAR,
BANGALORE 560032
4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

53

R.T. NAGAR,
BANGALORE 560032

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
BANGALORE 560001. s …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R4;


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE R-1
TO 5 HAVE NO RIGHT OR WHATSOEVER TO DEMOLISH THE
PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.40(CURRENT
SY.NO.40/P1P1), MEASURING 2 ACRES 16 GUNTAS SITUATED AT
SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR PANCHAYAT, YELAHANKA
HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TQ., BANGALORE AND PRESENTLY
COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF BBMP WITHOUT THE
PROPERTY BEING NOTIFIED FOR ACQUISITION IN THE
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DT: 03.02.2003 & FINAL
NOTIFICATION DT 23.02.2004 AND IS IN THE BBMP
JURISDICTION AND THE R-1 TO 3 DO NOT GET JURISDICTION.
IN W.P NO. 34259/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SHRI H B SHIVARAM
S/O LATE H.K.BACHANNA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,.
2. SHRI. H.B. SRINIVASA

S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA,
3. SHRI. H.B.SOMASHEKAR
54

4. SHRI. H.B. CHIDANANDA

5. SHRI. H.B. DAYANANDA

6. SMT. R. ANURADHA SUDHAKAR

W/O LATE H.B. SUDHAKAR,
ALL RESIDING AT NO.40, I CROSS,
SHANTHIVANA, SANJEEVINI NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 092.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. A.V. NISHANTH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN
DEVELOPMENT,
REP.BY ITS SECRETARY.

AUTHORITY
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,
REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
4. M/S SHANTHA INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

A PARTNERSHIP ENTERPRISES
HAVING OFFICE AT MAVALLI CHIKKANNA
CHARITIES BUILDING
SUBEDAR CHATRAM ROAD,
55
BANGALORE- 560 020

REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SRI. GEORGE PHILIP, ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SRI. B.VACHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-D TO THE W.P.
AND ETC.
IN W.P NO.34272/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
MRS NILOFER GEORGE

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
W/O LATE MR PRABHAKARAN GEORGE
R/AT NO.95/50, TIRUMANGALAM ROAD
VILLIVAKKAM, CHENNAI 600 049
BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR SHAM MOHAN
S/O MOHAN
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT NO.300, 10TH CROSS
BDS NAGAR, K NARAYANAPURA
...PETITIONER

AND:

M S BUILDING
BANGALORE 560 001
56

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE 560 001
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE 560 001
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH TH II FINAL
NOTIFICATION DT. 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANN-P AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 34391/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.P.SRINIVASAGOWDA
S/O LATE M.PUTTANNA,
R/AT NO.127, S.P.NILAYA,
K.NARAYANAPURA,
KOTHANUR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
AND:

M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE,
BY ITS COMMISSIONER-560001.
57

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. SHIVAKUMARAPPA T.C., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING)

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 BANGALORE DTD 18.06.2014
IN SO FAR AS THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED
WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX-F AND ETC.
IN WP NO.35204/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT RATHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
W/O T C CHINNASWAMY
REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER
SRI T C GIRISH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O SRI T C CHINNASWAMY
2. SRI T C GIRISH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
3. SRI T H BYREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O SRI T C HEMANNA
REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER
T.C.HEMANNA
S/O LATE CHIKKANNA.
4. SRI T C HEMANNA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O LATE CHIKKANNA
58
5. SRI T C CHINNASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O LATE CHIKKANNA
REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER
SRI T C GIRISH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
ALL RESIDING AT THANISANDRA

VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST
BANGALORE-560020.

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. B.V. SHANKAR NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE
FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. K. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE
KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 U/S
19(1) OF THE BDA ACT IE., ANNEXURE-K IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS IN SY.NO.94/1
OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE
59
EAST TQ. MEASURING 2 ACRES 38 GUNTAS (INCLUDING 3

GUNTAS KHARAB) AND ETC.,
IN WP NO.35243/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O KEMPANNA
R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE
SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560 077.
2. SRI NARAYANASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
KRISHANARAJAPURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE-560 077.
3. SRI SUBBANNA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O RAMAIAH
KRISHANARAJAPURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 001
60

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 003.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. B.V. SHANKAR NARAYANA RAO AND
SRI. K. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATES
FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.
IN WP NO.35247/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. A.APPANNA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O LATE ANJINAPPA
2. A. MUNEGOWDA
S/O SRI.T.THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
3. A.SATISH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O A.APPANNA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE

YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
...PETITIONERS

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
61
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001.

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE.

KUMARA PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
IN WP NO.35305/2014:
BETWEEN:
C.SANTAMARIA
AGED 65 YEARS
D/O PETER A. SANTAMARIA
NO.4, DAVIS ROAD
RICHARDS TOWN
BANGALORE-560 084.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAPIREDDY G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

M.S. BUILDING
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
62

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST,


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH PRLY.
ANNEXURE-D AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE ANNEXURE-E. IN SO FAR AS THE
SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE
AND ETC.
IN WP NO.35609/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. V.PRAKASH
S/O SRI P.D.VIJAYAGOPAL
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO.19, 1ST CROSS
OIL MILL ROAD, SAIT PALYAM
LINGARAJAPURAM
BANGALORE-560 084.
2. E.MEERA BAI
W/O SRI.J.VENUGOPAL
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT NO.4/16, PARSN RIVIER
IV MAIN ROAD EXTENSION
KOTTURPURAM
CHENNAI-600 085.
3. MRS.M.E.SUJATHA
W/O SRI.R.HARIHARADAS
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT NO.3/20, FOURT MAIN ROAD
KOTTUR GARDENS
CHENNAI – 600 085.
...PETITIONERS
63
(BY SRI. H.R.ANANTHA KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE)
AND:

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO
DEPARTMENT URBAN AND HOUSING
MULTI-STORIED BUILDING
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
K.P. WEST, BANGALORE.

K.P. WEST, BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL

NOTIFICATION NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE
ANNEXURE-F ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AND ETC.
IN WP NO.36164/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.VENKATAMMA
W/O RAMAIAH
MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
2. SRI R.SAMPANGIRAMAIAH
S/O RAMAIAH
MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT

K.NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
64
K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE EAST TALUK-561 009.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.C.VISWESHWARAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE 2ND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AS
ULTRAVIRES OF THE POWERS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT,
ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL
RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
IN WP NO.36166/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.MUNIVEERAMMA
W/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
65
2. SRI RAJKUMAR
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
3. SMT.VARALAKSHMI
D/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
4. SRI NAGESH
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT

K.NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077. ...PETITIONERS
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE 2ND
66
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AS

ULTRAVIRES OF THE POWERS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT,
ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL
RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
IN WP NO.36489/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI SYED NOORULLA

S/O SYED AHMED
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
2. SMT.MUMTAZ BEGUM
W/O SYED NOORULLA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.25,

GEDDALAHALLI, KOTHANUR POST
3. SMT. MEHER AYESHA

D/O SYED EHUSHAMUDDIN
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT NO.103, GEDDAHALLI
KOTHANUR POST
4. MRS.LAIQHA KHADRI
W/O MOHAMMED SUHEB
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
KOTHANUR POST
5. SRI.MOHAMMED IBRAHIM
S/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
KOTHANUR POST
6. SRI.MOHAMMED JAWED ALAM

S/O MOHAMMED BADIUZZAMA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
R/AT NO.12, GEDDALAHALLI
67
KOTHANUR POST
7. SRI.YENAYATHULLA KHAN GORI

S/O AHMEDULLA KHAN GHORI
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
8. SMT.NASEEBA BANO
W/O SRI. YENAYATHULLA KHAN GORI
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
SL.NO.7 & 8 ARE R/AT NO.23 & 24
GEDDALAHALLI, KOTHANUR POST
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 002.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS


ACQUISITION OF THE AND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDETS IN
PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/S 17(1) OF THE
BDA ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE-A) AND
NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE NO.UDD
193 MNX, BANGALORE DATED 23.02.2004 (ANNEXURE-B)
ISSUED BY THE R2 HAS LAPSED / IS ABANDONED IN SO FAR
68
THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND

ETC.
IN WP NO.36525/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA
S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
2. SRI MUNIRAJU
S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
3. SRI BACHE GOWDA

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
4. SRI ANJANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
5. SRI T.BAIRE GOWDA

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
(ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE

YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH
TALUK, BENGALURU-560 064.) ...PETITIONERS
AND:
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
M.S. BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001.

(REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER)
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020
69

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 BANGALORE DATED
18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS SERIAL NO.979,
SY.NO.30 (NEW SY.NO.30/1) MEASURING 07 ACRES 00 GUNTAS
OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU
NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC.,
IN WP NO.36971/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI SRINIVAS J.
S/O LATE K.V.JAIRAM
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
SADASHIVANAGARA
BENGALURU-560 030. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.N. SHIVANNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
M.S. BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001.

(REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER)
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020
70

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE RE-
MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 BANGALORE
DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS SERIAL
NO.845, SY.NO.76/2 MEASURING 00 ACRES 23 GUNTAS OF
JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH
TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC.
IN WP NO.37446/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. DODDAPAPAMMA
AGED 81 YEARS
WIFE OF LATE K.S.THIMMAIAH
RESIDING AT NO.88/A
KETHARAMANAHALLI, I BLOCK
RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010.
2. SMT. SUNITA PATIL

AGED 32 YEARS
WIFE OF UMESH PATIL
RESIDING AT H.NO.2153, D-BLOCK
OPPOSITE CORPORATION BANK
SAHAKARNAGAR,
(BY SRI. C.M.NAGABHUSHANA, ADVOCATE

AND SRI. B. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
71
BENGALURU-560 001
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. BINPIN HEGDE AND SRI. B.V. SHANKARA
NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI/ANOTHER OTHER ORDER/DIRECTION OF SIMILAR
NATURE QUASHING ANNEXURE-K DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY
THE R1. IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THE HON’BLE COURT HOLDS
THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-K,
THAN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT ANNEXURE-M
DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC.,
IN WP NO.38055/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
S/O LATE SONNAPPA
2. SRI.VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O LATE SONNAPPA
3. SRI.CHIKKAPPAIAH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE SONNAPPA
72
4. SMT.MUNILAKSHMAMMA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
W/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
ALL RESIDING AT KEMPAPURA

H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001.

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 001.

KUMAR PARK WEST,

SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR AND
SRI. I.G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE
ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.
IN WP NO.38463/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. MR. CONRAD KING

S/O MR.ARNOLD KING
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
73
2. MRS. LYNETTE LOUISE KING

W/O MR.CONRAD KING
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY

THE SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR.JEFFERY DAVID KING
S/O ARNOLD KING, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.108/6
APURVA MAPLES, APARTMENTS G-14
4TH FLOOR, 5TH BLOCK
1ST MAIN, HENNUR, KALYAN NAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 084. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. NALEENA LOGAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI
BANGALORE-560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK
BANGALORE-560 020.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
4. MR.M.C.NARAYANASWAMY
S/O MR.CHANGALVARAYA NAIDU
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
R4 DELETED AS PER ORDER DATED 31.05.2019)
74

NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, VIDE ANNEDURE-G ISSUED
BY THE R1, SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN WP NO.38471/2014
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH C.
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE CHOWRAPPA
NO.B2, MANYATHA RESIDENCY
RACHENAHALLI, NAGAWARA
ARABIC COLLEGE POST
BANGALORE-45. ...PETITIONER
AND:

M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY.

BANGALORE-560 020

( BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;


75
KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE

ANNEXURE-D IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC.,
IN WP NO.38472/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI JAMES RAJU REDDY

SON OF LATE SRI D.CHOWRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
2. SMT REBECCA JAMES

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
WIFE OF SRI JAMES RAJU REDDY
3. SMT J.RANITHA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
DAUGHTER OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY
4. SMT J.RONILLA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
DAUGHTER OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY
5. SRI J.DAVID RAJ REDDY

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
SON OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.140,

D.CHOWRAPPA LAYOUT
ERANNAPALAYA,
ARABIC COLLEGE POST
BAGNLORE – 560 045. ...PETITIONERS
AND:

M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY.

76

BANGALORE-560 020

BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS


ANNEXURE-D IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN WP NO.38661/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI K.R.NAGARAJA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH
R/AT NO.268/A
VENKATE GOWDA LAYOUT
NEAR VENKATESHWAR TEMPLE
KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.
2. SRI R.M. GOWDA

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH
R/AT NO.925/A, 3RD B CROSS
H.R.B.R., I BLOCK, KALYANAGAR
BANGALORE – 560 043.
3. SMT. K.R.RUKMINIAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
D/O LATE G. RAMAIAH &
W/O SRI V.BACHE GOWDA
4. SMT. B.PREETHI
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
D/O SRI V. BACHE GOWDA
77
3 & 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.9

1ST MAIN ROAD, G.RAMAIAH LAYOUT
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.
5. SMT. K.R. MANJULA

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
D/O LATE G.RAMAIAH
R/AT NO.11, 1ST MAIN ROAD
G.RAMAIAH LAYOUT
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA,
BANGALORE-560 024.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C.M. NAGABHUSHANA, AND
SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADVOCATES)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION
BENGALURU-560 020

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 7 R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-G
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF
THIS HON’BLE COURT HOLDS THAT RESPONDENTS HAVE
78
POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-G THAN TO DECLARE THAT,

DECLARTION AT ANNEXURE-J DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO
EXISTS AND ETC.
IN WP NO.38753/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.C.SAVITRAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
W/O LATE M.RAMAIAH
R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 026.
2. SRI.R.VASUDEVAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O LATE M.RAMAIAH
R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 026. ...PETITIONERS

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 001

KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS

79

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE
ANNEXURE-D ISSUED BY R1 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 39383/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI.N.KANTHARAJU
S/O N. NARASIMHARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT NO.72
8TH MAIN,BTM LAYOUT,
2ND STAGE,BANGALORE-560 076
2. SRI K. HEMANTH
S/O N. KANTHARAJU,
DECEASED SON OF SMT T. N.
CHANDRAVATHI
R/AT NO.2/35,
2ND "C" MAIN ROAD,
6TH "D"CROSS,BOOPASANDRA,
BANGALORE-560 054
3. MRS. MARY VARGHESE

W/O SUNNY VARGHESE,
R/T NO.571,
SUNNY'S NEST,
SUBBANNA PALYA,
2ND CROSS,BANASWADI
BANGALORE-560 043
4. MR BANKIM D' SHAH

S/O DHANSHUKLAL R. SHAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
5. MRS AMITHA B. SHAH

W/O BANKIM D SHAH,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.4 & 5 ARE

80
R/AT NO.201 "ARIHANTH"

GOVINDANAGAR,BORIBALI WEST
MUMBAI-400 098
6. SMT LAVANYA S MURALI

W/O S MURALI,
R/AT NO.213,
6TH CROSS,R R TEMPLE STREET,
DEVASANDRA MAIN ROAD,
K R PURAM,BANGALORE-560 036
7. SMT T A GOWRI
W/O K NARENDRA BABU,
R/AT NO.33/659,
VARMA LAYOUT,VIDYASARAGA,
THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
SHIVARAMA KARANTH POST,
BANGALORE-560 077
8. SRI P. U. KANNAN
S/O P. UMAMANI,
R/AT NO.277,
SECTOR-C,JALAVAYU VIHA
KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
ST. THOMAS TOWN POST,
BANGALORE-560 54
9. SRI VEERESH CHANNAVEERAIAH

HIREMATH,S/O CHANNAVEERAIAH,
R/AT NO.TYPE-III/7
IVRI,HEBBAL
(BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
81

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
REP BY SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA FOR R1 & R2;


NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEX-A DATED
18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE
INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED
NOTIFICATION AT ANNEX-A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 39633/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI SEETHARAM
S/O MUNIYAPPA,
R/AT SRIRAMPURA,
KASABA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 029
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. CHANDRASHEKAR ACHAR, ADVOCATE
SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE
SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
82
M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE
FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY R-1 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-C
AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 39832/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. KRISHNA REDDY

S/O LATE CHIKKATHYAPPA,
AGED 80 YEARS,
R/AT CHEELLAKERE VILLAGE,
KALAYANAGAR & POST,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ.,
BANGALORE DISTRICT-560045
(NOT CLAIMED SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFIT)
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA AND
SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. PATEL, ADVOCATES)
AND:

83

M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-1
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) DATED 03.02.2003,
PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF
THE PETITIONER'S LAND BEARING SY.NO.129/2 MEASURING 25
GUNTAS OUT OF 30 GUNTAS, LAND BEARING SY.NO.133/1
MEASURING 32 GUNTAS OUT OF 1 ACRE 2 GUNTAS, LAND
BEARING SY.NO.133/2 MEASURING 6 GUNTAS & LAND BEARING
SY.NO.133/3 MEASURING 5 GUNTAS, SITUATE AT CHELLAKERE
VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEX-M AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 40204/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT. PARVATHAMMA
W/O LATE VENKATAREDDY
RESIDING AT KEMPAPURA
H.A FARM POST,
84
BANGALORE-560024
(SR.CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED). ...PETITIONER

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-5600020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS


ANNEX-D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.40379/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI K. S. RAMANATHAN
SON OF K.A.SHIVARAMA KRISHNAN,
RESIDING AT NO.Y-2,
EVERSHINE APARTMENTS,
NO.134, NHCS LAYOUT,
85
3RD STAGE, 4TH BLOCK,

BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560079
2. MR.NAYEEN BASHA
SON OF ABDUL MUTHALIB,
RESIDNIG AT NO.323,
HBR LAYOUT, 8TH CROSS,
NEAR WISDOM SCHOOL,
YASEEN NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560043. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-56 0020.
3. THE SECRETARY
GOVT. OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE- 560 001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;


NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANN-A, DATED
18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
UNENFORCEABLE IN THEEYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE
NOTIFICATION AT ANN-A AND ETC.
86
IN W.P. NO. 41394/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. A SHEELA
D/O P. ARJUNAN
2. A. KAVITHA
D/O P. ARJUNAN
3. A. HAVILA
D/O P. ARJUNAN
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.40,

GEETHA MANDIR ROAD,
1ST CROSS, J.C. NAGAR,
(M.R. PALYAM),
BANGALORE-560 006.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. R. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-1
BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS

87

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ALLOTMENT
LETTER DATED 09.04.2014 VIDE ANNX-G ISSUED BY THE R-1
AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 41422/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI S. MUNEGOWDA
S/O LATE SONNAMARAPPA,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NANJA REDDY P.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

BANALORE-560 003.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN-B AND THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F PASSED BY THE
R-1 AND 2 IN SO FAR AS THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.33/1 OF
DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
88
TALUK MEASURING 3 ACRES 10 GUNTAS AND DELETE THE

SAME FROM THE ACQUISITION AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 41427/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.N.RAVIKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O R NARAYANAGOWDA
K R PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560026
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M. S. BUILDING
BANGALORE-1

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST

SRI. K. KRISHNA FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1, DATED 18.06.2013, WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANN-D AND ETC.
89
IN W.P. NO. 41428/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.KEMPAMMA
W/O LATE KEMPAIAH,
(SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
2. SRI K. C. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE P.KEMPAIAH,
3. SRI KESHAVKUMAR
4. SRI K MURTHY
5. SMT NAGAMMA
W/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH,
6. SRI PRAKASH
S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH,
7. SRI K SHANKAR
8. SRI JAYARAM
9. SRI C. K. MANJUNATH
AGED ABOUT YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK- 560 038. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)

90
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE,
BY ITS COMMISSIONER-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-
D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 41858/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT ASHWATHAMMA
W/O LATE G. RAMAIAH,
RESIDING AT NO.15,
MARUTHI NILAYA,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.
2. SMT. G.R. SHAILAJA
W/O M GOPALA KRISHNE GOWDA,
R/AT NO.1, SY NO.27/3,
91
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA,
(BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST EXTENSION,
BANGALORE-560 020,
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-F, DATED
18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS
HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER
TO ISSUE ANN-F THAN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT
ANN-H DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 43815/2014:
BETWEEN:
MRS K. JAYASHREE
W/O D. VIJAYA KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 206
92
MARUTI LAYOUT
HEBBALA, DASARA HALLI
HA FORM PO
(BY SRI. RAJESWARA P. N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

STATE OF KARNATAKA
KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT
III FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA
DR B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001

NO. 20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020

NO. 20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD

SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF

NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE B.D.A. ACT
ISSUED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 18.06.2014
(ANNEX-A) IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED BEING PROPERTY NO.206, CARVED OUT IN
SY.NO.48/1 OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 43963/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI KRISHNAPPA
93
S/O.LATE RAMAIAH,
2. SRI S. R. ANJINAPPA
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
3. SRI S. R. MURTHY
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
4. SRI S. R. ANAND
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
5. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA
W/O ANJINAPPA,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF

SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI-560064
BANGALORE NORTH(ADDITIONAL)
TALUK-560064
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KALYAN R., ADVOCATE)
AND:

BANGALORE-01
(BY ITS SECRETARY)

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-22.
(REPTS. BY ITS COMMISIONER)

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-22.
94
4. THE UNDER SECRETARY


SRI. M.N. RAMAJANEJA REDDY, ADVOCATE
FOR R2 & R3)

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-4 AS
PER ANNEX-A TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR AS SERIAL NO.921 IN THE
FINAL NOTIFICATION IS CONCERNED IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS
BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 44306/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. LAKSHMANA G.
S/O GOVINDA RAO,
NO.485, 6TH MAIN,
8TH MAIN, MICO COLONY,
BTM 2ND STAGE,
BANGALORE.
2. DR. SANJAY B PATIL

S/O BABU GOWDA PATIL,
NO.204/B/3, 1ST FLOOR
6TH MAIN ROAD, 27TH CROSS
3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR
BANGALORE.
3. LINGARAJU B.
S/O S. BHEEMAPPA,
NO.204/B/3, I FLOOR,
6TH MAIN ROAD, 27TH CORSS,
3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE.
95
4. CHANDRASHEKAR N.R.,
S/O RUDRAPPA,
NO.408, 22ND MAIN, 2ND STAGE,
J.P.NAGAR, MYSORE.
5. THARANATHA SETTY I.
S/O LATE SHESHA SHETTY,
AGED 61 YEARS,
HOTEL ANUPAMA, 5 & 6,
TANK BUND ROAD,
BANGALORE.
6. MUDDAMMA,
W/O RAMASWAMY,
AGED 62 YEARS,
NO.59/544, "SAI SADANA",
SANTHE BEEDHI,
ANEKAL TOWN,
BANGALORE.
7. JAYAMMA. D.,
Q/O D NARASHIMAIAH,
AGED 60 YEARS,
NO.6/1, N R ROAD,
SBM OPP, ANEKAL TOWN,
BANGALORE DISTRICT.
8. FAROOQ MUNNAWAR,
W/O L.PEER MUNAVAR,
AGED 62 YEARS,
NO.16/21, GROUND FLOOR,
I CROSS, BANNERGHATTA ROAD,
OLD GURUPPANA PALYA,
BANGALORE.
9. SEETHA LAKSHMI R.
W/O T. RAMAMURTHY,
AGED 58 YEARS,
NO.35, KAVERAPPA LAYOUT,
MILLAR TANK BUND ROAD,
BANGALORE CANTONMENT,
BANGALORE.
96
10. VASANTHI ASHOK,

W/O ASOKAIAH,
AGED 50 YEARS,
NO.35, KAVERAPPA LAYOUT,
VASANTHNAGAR,
BANGALORE.
11. JAGADAMBA B.K.

D/O BASAPPA,
AGED 69 YEARS,
NO.504/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
KENGERI UPANAGAR,
BANGALORE.
12. SUNDAR D.T.,

W/O DESH LINGA GOWDA,
AGED 50 YEARS,
NO.95, 3RD CROSS,
BASAVESHWARANAGARA LAYOUT,
VIJAYA NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
13. RAMACHANDRAPPA B.
S/O B. NANEPPA,
AGED 74 YEARS,
NO.39/1, 2ND MAIN,
SHESHADRIPURAM,
BANGALORE.
14. BAYAPPA REDDY Y.,

S/O LATE YARAPPA REDDY,
AGED 75 YEARS,
NO.354, 9TH MAIN,
VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE,
BANGALORE.
15. SUSEELA GOUD. M.,

W/O BASAVANA GOWDA M,
AGED 63 YEARS,
NO.48/A, 18TH A CROSS,
1ST MAIN, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR,
HEBBAL KUMPARA,
BANGALORE.
97
16. BALARAM N.,

S/O LATE NARASHIMAIAH,
AGED 64 YEARS,
RAVI. NO.204/17,
4TH MAIN, GANGA NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
17. VIJAYENDRA K.V.,

S/O K.VEERAIAH,
AGED 53 YEARS,
RAIV NO.204/17,
4TH MAIN, GANGA NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
18. ANSUYA N,
W/O ANANATHAPADMANABHA,
AGED 51 YEARS,
NO.6, 19TH CROSS,
RAMASWAMY LAYOUT,
LALJI NAGAR, LAKKASANDRA,
BANGALORE.
19. RAMACHANDRA U.
S/O K.V. UGRAPPA,
AGED 59 YEARS,
NO.42, 5TH C MAIN,
2ND BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
20. NAGAPPA U. V.
S/O K.V. UGRAPPA,
AGED 62 YEARS,
NO.42, 5TH C MAIN,
BANGALORE.
21. THIMMARAJ SETTY T.K.

S/O T.V. KENCHARAYA SETTY,
AGED 61 YEARS,
NO.111/45, 5TH MAIN,
OFFICIAL COLONY,
BYRASANDRA, JAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE.
22. SRIDHARAN A.C.

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
98
S/O A.C. CHANDRASHEKAR,

NO.169, 9TH CROSS,
1ST BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
23. BASAVARAJAIAH M.T.

S/O LATE M. THIMMAIAH,
AGED 69 YEARS,
NO.2515, 9TH CROSS,
S.S. PURAM, TUMKUR.
24. VISHALAKSHA KADIVAL,

W/O PANDURANG ACHAR KADIVAL,
AGED 60 YEARS,
NO.265, 1ST BLOCK,
8TH CROSS, R.T.NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
25. NAGALAKSHMI S
W/O KRISHNA MURTHY S,
AGED 63 YEARS,
NO.47, 5TH C MAIN,
BANGALORE-560 032.
26. MALATHI,
W/O GURURAJ WADYER,
AGED 45 YEARS,
NO.11, 14TH CROSS,
KANAKANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 032.
27. C.T.H. TAURO,

S/O LATE C.M.TAURO,
AGED 62 YEARS,
NO.72, 5TH MAIN, 5TH CORSS,
SRI KRISHNA GARDEN,
R.R.NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 059.
28. SRINIVAS K.E.,

S/O ESWARAPPA K.N.,
AGED 53 YEARS,
NO.574, GROUND FLOOR,
NEAR NEW TOWN PUBLIC SCHOOL,
99
8TH B MAIN, B SECTOR,

YALAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE-560 064.
29. NANDINI K.V.

KRISHNA PANI,
AGED 34 YEARS,
NO.X-104, ADARSHA APARTMENT,
DEVARA BEESANAHALLI,
BANGALORE.
30. PANKAJA RAMESHESHA,

W/O M.R. RAMASHESHA,
AGED 60 YEARS,
NO.801, MELODY BLOCK,
H.H.TAMBOURINE APARTMENTS,
KANAKAPURA ROAD,
J P NAGAR, 6TH PHASE,
BANGALORE-560 078.
31. VATSALAL MURTHY,

W/O H.R.K. MURTHY,
AGED 60 YEARS,
D116, TOWN 2, BRIGADE PARMSPRINGS,
24TH MAIN, 7TH PHASE,
J P NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 078.
32. INDIRA,
D/O ARUNACHALAM K,
AGED 62 YEARS,
NO.190, 9TH CROSS,
R.T.NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
33. SHYLAJA S
W/O V. SHANKARANARAYANA,
AGED 50 YEARS,
NO.303, 2ND FLOOR,
BLOCK-02, SKYLINE CITY APARTMENTS,
CHANDRA LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI 1ST STAGE,
BANGALORE -560 072.
34. PRADEEP NAGARAJ,

S/O H.R.NAGARAJA,
AGED 56 YEARS,
100
NO.289, 11TH A CROSS,

J P NAGAR, 2ND PHASE,
BANGALORE-560 078.
35. NAGA PRASAD K.V.

S/O K.V. VENKATESHAIAH,
AGED 37 YEARS,
NO.603, RMZ APARTMETN,
YALAHANKA,
BANGALORE.
36. SRINIVAS K
S/O ESHWARAPPA, K.N.
AGED 53 YEARS,
NEAR NEW TOWN PUBLIC SCHOOL,
8TH MAIN, B-SECTOR,
YALAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE.
37. M/S TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,
NO.12/3A, NANDA GOKULA,
YAMUNABAI ROAD,
MADHAVANAGAR,
BANGALORE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
VENKATESHAIAH K.V. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. B.M.HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR P4, P8, P9,

P11,P13,P14,P26,P29, P32 & P36;
SRI. B. RANGASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR
P1-3,5-7, 10,12,15-25, 27, 28, 30,31, 33 TO 35;
V/O/DTD 09/02/17 PETITION DISMISSED AGAINST P37)
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
101
BANGALORE-560 020,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
4. SMT. NARAYANAMMA,
W/O LATE GUNDU RAO,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT DOOR NO.22,
1ST FLOOR, BALAJI LAYOUT,
R.T. NAGAR POST,

SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SMT. VASANTHA LAKSHMI H.V., ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED R5)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-
M IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 44527/2014:
BETWEEN:
MR P.V.THOMAS PANICKER
S/O SRI. GEE VARGHESE PANICKER
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/AT NO. 34, SHANTINAGAR
PRESS ROAD
TRIVENDRUM-695 001
KERALA. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA KESVY, ADVOCATE)

102
AND:

4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. KESHAVA R AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED U/S 17(1) &(3) OF THE
BDA ACT 1976 VIDE ANNX-E ISSUED BY R-2 IN SO FAR AS THE
PETITIONERS LANDS ARE CONCERNED AS THE SAME IS NOT
REQUIRED FOR THE SCHEME OF THE BDA AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 44742/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT NANJAMMA
W/O N.SHAMANNA,
D/O LATE N.NARAYANAPPA,
JAKKUR, JAKKUR VILLAGE,
(BY SRI. S. MAHESH, ADVOCATE AND

SRI. K.R. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)
103
AND:
1. THE SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA,
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE COMMISSIONER
T.CHOWDIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
4. ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
LAND ACQUISITION
T.CHOWDIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY
THE R-1 AT ANNX-K AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THEREOF
IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS LAND DESCRIBED IN THE
SCHEDULE HEREUNDER IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 44835/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI SRINIVAS J.
S/O LATE K.V.JAIRAM,
R/AT NO.326, 15TH CROSS,
104
SADASHIVANAGARA,
BANGALORE-560 030.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAMA BHAT K., ADVOCATE)
AND:

REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

(REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER),
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU -560 020.

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,

SRI. KESHAV R. AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. S.G. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE MODIFIED
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, UNDER SEC.19(1) OF
THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 ISSUED
BY THE R-1, AT SERIAL NO. 896, PERTAINING TO LAND
COMPRISED IN SY.NO.103/1, MEASURING 00 ACRES 36 GUNTAS
OF JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH
TQ. ISSUED BY THE R1, AS PER ANN-B AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 45486/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.N.RAVIKUMAR
S/O R. NARAYANAGOWDA,
R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
K. R. PURAM HOBLI,
105
BANGALORE EAST TALUK,

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560 030
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M S BUILDING,
BANGALORE-01

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
4. SRI N. B. CHANDRASHEKARIAH
S/O BASAPPA,
R/AT NIDUVANI VILLAGE,
HALLI MYSORE HOBLI,
HOLENARSIPUR TALUK,
HASSAN DISTRICT-585 154. …RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEX-H AND ETC.
106
IN W.P. NO. 46766/2014:
BETWEEN:
MRS.M.SHAMSHAD BEGUM
W/O LATE K. SADIQ SAHEB
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/A NO.157-D
ASWATH NAGAR, ALANKAR LAYOUT
TANISANDRA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST
(BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE

AND SRI. G. GANGIREDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY
BANGALORE

SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER



RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER
FROM ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS WHICH ARE NOTIFIED FOR
THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATI LAYOUT, I.E., 1 ACRE 20 GUNTAS
OF LAND IN SY. NO.14/1, IN FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 SITUATED IN THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM
HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ. BY CONSIDERING
REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 04.07.2014 AS
PER ANNX-B AND ETC.
107
IN W.P. NO. 47103/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT JAYAMMA
W/O HANUMANTHAPPA,
R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI,
YELAHANKA HOBLI-560 023
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE )

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020,
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNX-C AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47105/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT CHIKKAKAMAKKA
108

W/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA,
2. SMT. KAMAKSHAMMA,
W/O LATE HOODI MUNISWAMY,
3. SMT. A.P.PADMA,
D/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA,
4. MR. A.P.NATARAJ,
S/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA,
ALL RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 0210,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

109

IN W.P. NO. 47106/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT C. SAVITRAMMA
W/O LATE RAMAIAH,
(SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIM)
2. SRI. VASUDEVAMURTHY R
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
BOTH RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI

VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
BANGALORE-560 030
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
110


IN W.P. NO. 47107/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. MUNIANJANAPPA
S/O MADDURAPPA,
R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE,
ASHWATHKATTE ROAD,
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
111


IN W.P. NO. 47608/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT USHA S. RAO,

W/O LATE SRI. SATHYANARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
R/A 'MAHATE'
NO. 169/1, 2ND MAIN
B/W 3RD & 4TH CROSS
CHAMRAJAPET
BANGALORE-560 018
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PATIL JAI M., ADVOCATE )
AND:

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
112

VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
( BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
(R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 20/10/2014)

LANDS WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT (RFD) IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT (
VIDE ANNX-K TO THE W.P.) AS AGAINST SY.NOS.45/5 & 45/6 IS
WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT ANY ACQUISITION
PROCEEDINGS AND UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE
PETITIONER SO FAR AS PETITIONER SCHEDULE LAND
(PROPERTY) AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47731/2014:
BETWEEN:
V. VENKATAMARI
S/O LATE VENKATASHAMAPPA,
AGED 64 YEARS,
R/O 297, MARAPPA LAYOUT,
S.R.K NAGAR (P.O)
(BY SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
113
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION)

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)

NOTIFICATIONS VIDE ANN-D DATED 03.02.2003 AND ANN-F
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2 IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATED TO 1.37 ACRES OF LAND IN SY.NO.72/2 OF
THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH
TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47821/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT. RATHNAMMA
W/O SRI NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/A NO.78, K NARAYANAPURA
ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD
SHIVARAMAKARANATH NAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560077
REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER

SMT PADMAVATHI N
D/O SMT RATHNAMMA
W/O SRI HARISHA V
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
114
SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST

BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNTAKA
REP BY ITS SECRETARY
M S BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560001

REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2013 PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEX-H IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED
AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47860/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT K V VEENAMMA
W/O KRSIHNAPPA M
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.86
BHAGYA LAKSHMI TRADERS
ANJINEYA TEMPLE STREET
115
YOGESHWARANAGAR ROAD
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE - 560 024
2. SRI INDER SINGH

S/O LATE P ESWAR SINGH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEAS
MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE - 24
3. SHASHI SINHA
S/O RAM BABU SINGH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT NO.14
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE - 24
4. M. RAMAKRSIHNA
S/O MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT NO.1, 1ST MAIN
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE 24
5. SUSHMA SHARMA
S/O SOHAN SHARMA
AGED ABOUT YEARS
R/AT NO.5, S
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE - 24
6. S ANJALIDEVI
D/O LATE SREERAMULU NAIDU
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT NO.4,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE 24
7. SRI NAVEEN LAL SHAH

S/O LATE S.L. SHAH
R/AT NO.6
116
1ST MAIN
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE - 24
8. SRI PRAKASHAPPA
S/O CHANNAIAH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/AT NO.36, 1ST MAIN,
2ND CROSS
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE 24
9. NINGAPPA A P
S/O PUTTEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO.53/1, SSA ROAD
4TH MAIN, HEBBAL
BANGALORE- 24
10. K NARASIMHALU
S/O K OBAIAH
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/AT NO.56
NAGAIAH BUILDING
1OTH CROSS
KALANAGAR
KAMMAGONDANAHALLI
(BY SRI. L. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE )
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE 560001
BY ITS SECRETARY

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARAPARK WEST
BANGALORE 20
R/P BY ITS COMMISSIONER
117

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARAPARK WEST
BANGALORE 20
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRLY.
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R2 U/S 17(1) & (3) OF THE
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, UNDER PRLY. NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 & THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
18.06.2014 PRODUCED AT ANN-A & ANN-B PASSED BY THE R-1
IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER IN SITUATED IN
KEMPAPURA VILLAGE, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH
TQ. BANGALORE IS CONCERNED AND ETC
IN W.P. NO. 47913/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MOHAMMED MOIEZULLA

S/O SRI MOHAMMED MUSTAFA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/A NO.3, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE
SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE-560077
2. SRI MOHAMMED ALTAF AHMED

S/O MOHAMMED NASIR AHMED
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/A NO.16, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGALORE-560077
3. SRI B VARALASKHMI
W/O SRI DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
4. SHRI PAVAN KUMAR

S/O SRI DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
SL.NO. 3 & 4 R/A NO.17,
118
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGALORE-560077
5. SRI B S MURULI
S/O SRI M SRIRAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
2ND CROSS, CHANAL ROAD
MAGADI ROAD
CHOLURALYA
BANGALORE-560026
6. SMT T NAZIRA BANU

W/O ANEEZ PASHA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
R/A NO.25, "E" NO.4TH STREET
BROADWAY ROAD CROSS
BANGALORE-560051
7. SRI SHAIK YARAB

S/O MR NAWAB SHARIEFF
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/A NO.23, NARAYANASWAMY COMPOUND
2ND CROSS, SONNAPA GARDEN
DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI
BANGALORE-560045
8. SMT SYEDA UMERA

W/O SRI SYED RAFIQ
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
R/A NO.47, 48, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGALORE-560077
9. SRI ATAULLA
S/O IBRAHIM
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
R/A NO.483, DODDANNA NAGAR
K B SANDRA, R T NAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560032
10. SIR FAIROZ KHAN

S/O RAHMAN KHAN
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/A NO.483, DODDANNA NAGAR
119
K B SANDRA, R T NAGAR POST

BANGALORE-560032
11. SMT HAJIRA BI

W/O SRI SYED MAROOF
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/A NO.64, 2ND CROSS,
BEHIND P & T QUARTERS
KHB MAIN ROAD
RANKANAGAR, R T NAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560032
12. SMT MUMTAZ UNNISA

W/O ASHIAQ AHMED GHOUN
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/A 92, 5TH CROSS
KAUSERNAGAR, R T NAGAR
BANGALORE-560032
13. SRI ASAD JAMAL

S/O SRI ABDUL KHAYUM
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
14. SRI KURSHID ALAM

S/O ASAD JAMAL
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
SL.NO.13 & 14 ARE R/A NO.8/2, 1ST CROSS
BEHIND GOVT KANNADA SCHOOL
PADARAYANAPURA
BANGALORE-560026
15. SRI G RAMESH KUMAR

S/O SR. M GANGANNA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/A NO.16, 2ND CROSS
N K PALYA, SHIVAJINAGAR
BANGALORE-560051
16. SMT AZHAR JABEEN

W/O SYED MOHAMMED SHA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/A HOUSE NO.52
COOKS ROAD, A THIMMAIAH ROAD CROSS
BHARATHI NAGAR
BANGALORE-560001
120
17. SRI RAHEEM BAIG

S/O ABBAS BAIG
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/A NO.124/97, 4TH MAIN ROAD
NEW GURUPPAN PALYA
BANNERGHATTA MAIN RAOD
BANGALORE-560029
18. SRI MUNEER JAN

S/O ABDUL AZEEZ
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/A E-127
NEW NO.22/9B, RING ROAD
NORTH SIDE NAGAWARA
ARABIC COLLEGE POST
BANGALORE-560045
19. SMT FAREEDA BANU

W/O SRI SAMIULLAKHAN
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/A NO.1479
RAMA TEMPLE STREET
VINAYAKA STREET, IIND CROSS
VENKATESPURAM
BANGALORE-560045
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560002

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
121

PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/SEC. 17(1) OF THE
BDA ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2203 VIDE ANN-A & NOTIFICATION
ISSUED/U/SEC. 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE
ANN-B ISSUED BY THE R2 HAS LAPSED IS ABANDONED IN SO
FAR THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED.
IN W.P. NO. 48577/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT VIJAYALAXMI
W/O N PANDU
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/A #167/167-A, 2ND CROSS
DEEPIKA LAYOUT
CHELLAKERE
BANGALORE-560043
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA V RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE-01
2. COMMISSIONER
BANGALORRE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
3. THE ADDL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BANGALORRE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
122
…RESPONDENTS
( BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA)

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PASSED BY THE R-2 ANNX-H
AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2204, PASSED BY R-1,
ANNX-J AND CONSEQUENTIAL AWARD AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 48880/2014:
BETWEEN:
V. KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE MUTHUR VENKATAPPA,
YELHANKA HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BANGALORE-01
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20.

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20.
….RESPONDENTS

SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE AND
SRI.A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
123

DATED 30.10.2010 PASSED BY THE R-2 AND 3 REJECTING THE
REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER MEASURING TO AN
EXTENT OF 5 1/4TH GUNTAS OF THE LAND VIDE ANN-F AND
ETC.
IN W.P. NO.49567/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O. LATE CHOWDAPPA
2. SRI. JAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O. LATE CHOWDAPPA
BOTH RESIDING AT
DASARAHALLI,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE. ...PETITIONERS

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE -560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE-560 0020

124

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE II FINAL
NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DTD.18.6.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE
R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-H.
IN W.P. NO.50260/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.SHANMUGUM
S/O.M.MURGAN,
R/AT NO.43/1, "SRIRAMPURA ROAD,
18TH CROSS, AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE,
SAHAKARANAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-94
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K.H., ADVOCATE)
AND:

BANGALORE-1
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20

AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR
125

NOTIFICATIOND ATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S
LAND IS CONCERNED VIDE ANN-A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.50533/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.B.G.GIRIJA
D/O. LATE GOVINDASWAMY AND
W/O. CHENNAKESHAVA,
R/AT BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE AND
POST, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL
TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
2. SMT. B.G.MANJULA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
D/O. LATE GOVINDASWAMY AND
W/O. S.GOPAL
R/AT NO.124, THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTHA NAGARA,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

DR.B.R.AMEBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

126

BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS
RELATING TO ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS OF PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION ANNEX-F FINAL NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNEX-G.
IN W.P. NO.51294/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHANNAMMA
AGEDA BOUT 60 YEARS
W/O. LATE KEMPANNA,
R/AT THANISANDRA
DR.SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

127
KUMARA PARK WEST

BANGALORE - 560 020
4. MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA REDDY

S/O. THIRUPUL REDDY
5. SMT. MUNIREDDY SAMPORNAM

W/O.SRI.MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA
REDDY, AGEDA BOUT 53 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5

R/AT NO.75, 3RD MAIN, AMARYA JOTHYI
LAYOUT CHOLANAGAR, R.T.NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 032
6. SMT.GEETHA BHAVANI
W/O. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD
7. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD
S/O.SRI.CHENNAKESHAVALU NAIDU
R/AT.53, 3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN,
DENA BANK COLONY, GANGOR,
BANGALORE-32
8. K.N.VISHWANATH
S/O.KADIDA NAGAPPA
R/AT KADIADAL HAROGALIAGE POST,
TIRTHAHALLI TALUK,
SHIMOGGA-577 411
9. SRI.ANANDA BABU
S/O. D.A.NARAYANA SWAMY
R/AT NO.15/'A', 16/'A',
13TH CROSS, BESHWANAGAR,
MARTHI LAYOUT, DASARHALLI,
BANGALORE-24
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
128
SRI. B.V. RAMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4-R7;

SRI. M.K. SRIPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4-R8;
SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R6-R8;
SRI. P. RAJESHWARA, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. S. VASANTH MADHAV, ADVOCATE FOR R9)

NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.14 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-C AND
ETC.
IN W.P. NO.51930/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
S/O.LATE NARASAPPA,
R/AT SAMIPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O.T.V.KRISHNAMURTHY
I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-85
...PETITIONER
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

129
KUMARA PARK WEST

BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-
D.
IN W.P. NO.51931/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT.KANTAMMA
W/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA
R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
REP. BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA
S/O.T.V.KRSIHNAMURTHY
I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 71
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
130

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS


NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-D
ISSUED BY THE R-1 TO 3 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.51932/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA
W/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA
2. ANANDAMURTHY
S/O.LATE DODDABYRAPPA
3. SRI.RAMAMURTHY
S/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
REP. BY THEIR
POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR.B.L.NARENDRA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O.C.V.LAKSHMI NARAYAN SHASTRI
R/AT NO.29/1, 9TH CROSS,
RMV EXTENSION,
BANGALORE-80
...PETITIONERS
131
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST


NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-
E.
IN W.P. NO.52760/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI.NARAYANAPPA
S/O. LATE CHANNARARAPPA
R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA,
II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT
HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064
2. SRI.C.JAYARAM
S/O.LATE CHANNARAYAPPA
SINCE DECEASED BY LRs
132
a) SMT.BHAGYA
W/O.LATE C.JAYARAM
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
b) SRI.KIRAN
S/O.LATE C. JAYARAM
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
c) SRI.KISHORE
S/O.LATE C.JAYARAM
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
PETITIONERS 2(a) TO 2(c)

ARE R/AT NO.211,
DURGA NILAYA II MAIN,
NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT
BANGALORE-560064
3. SRI.C.SUBBANNA
S/O.LATE CHANNARAYAPPA
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs
(a) SMT.MUNITHAYAMMA
W/O.LATE C. SUBBANNA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA
II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR
GOVERNMENT, HIGH SCHOOL,
JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064
(b) SMT.SUJATHA
D/O.LATE C. SUBBANNA
W/O.SRI.RAMALINGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
(c) SMT.VEENA
D/O. LATE C.SUBBANNA
W/O.SRI.RAMALINGARAJU
3(b) AND 3(c) BOTH ARE

R/AT DEVASHETTIHALLI
CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK
AND DISTRICT
133
(d) SMT.REKHA
D/O. LATE C. SUBBANNA
W/O.SRI.RAGHU
R/AT NO.390, II CROSS,
KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560 094
(e) SRI.KESHAVA
S/O. LATE C. SUBBANNA
R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA,
II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT
BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.R. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

OF KARNATAKA
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE COMMISSIONER
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,

SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4)

FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.14, ISSUED BY THE R1, AT ANN-D,
134
IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO ACQUIRING THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER.
IN W.P. NO.53854/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.MUNISHYAMAPPA
S/O.LATE DANDU CHIKKANNA,
R/AT NO.261, I MAIN, 2ND CROSS,
DASARAHALLI, H.A.FARM POST,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 024
SINCE DEAD BY LRs

1(a) SMT.GOWRAMMA
D/O. LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA
R/AT THAVATAHALLI,
HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
1(b) SRI.D.M.GOWDARAJU
S/O.LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA
R/AT KEMPEGOWDA MAIN ROAD,
DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL POST,
BANGALORE-560 024
1(c) SRI.D.M.CHANDRAPPA
S/O. LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA
R/AT KEMPEGOWDA MAIN ROAD,
DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL POST,
(BY SRI. CHENNARAYA REDDY S., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT,
135
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,

SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2;

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE MODIFIED
FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.14 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS PER
ANNEX-Q AND CONSEQUENTLY HOLD THAT PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION ISSUED DTD. 3.2.2003 AS PER ANNEX-N AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.23.2.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS PER
ANNEX-P DOES NOT SURVIVE.
IN W.P. NO.54059/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
W/O.DODDABYRAPPA
2. SRI.RAMAMURTHY
S/O.LATE DODDABYRAPPA
3. SRI.ANANDMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA
136
ALL ARE RESIDING AT

SMAPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
BANGALORE-98
REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR.B.L.NAGENDRA PRASAD
S/O.C.V.LAKSHMINARAYANA SHASTRY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.29/A, 9TH CROSS,
RMV EXTENSION,

AND:

M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,


NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY R-1 TO
R-3.
137
IN W.P.NO.54083/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH,
R/O JAKKUR VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
(BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
REPESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

KUMARA PARK WEST,

SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-G), IN SO
FAR AS IT RELATES TO LANDS IN SURVEY NOS.11 AND 14 OF
VENKATESHAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE
NORTH TALUK, BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER NAT SL.NOS.
1037 AND 1040 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL
CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
138
IN W.P.NO.54236/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH,
2. SRI MUNIRAJU,
3. SRI BACHE GOWDA,

4. SRI ANJANAPPA,
5. SRI T. BAIRE GOWDA,

ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T CHOWDAIAIH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,
REPRSENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
139

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION BANGALORE, DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEX-F), IN SO
FAR AS IT RELATES TO LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 1
GUNTA IN SURVEY NO.27/4 OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELANHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, (SCHEDULE
PROPERTY) AT SL.NO.974 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO
THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL
CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.54358/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SATHYANARAYANA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
2. S. MUKUNDA RAO
S/O SHANKAR RAO
PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 RISIDING

A/T RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGLAORE EAST TALUK,
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. N. SONNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDINGS,
140
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALROE-560 020.

BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAID
IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014
VIDE ANNEX-D BY THE R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.54725/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT S. SUJATHA
W/O SRI. S. V. GANESH,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.8,
ROGERS ROAD, RICHARDS TOWN,
(C. V. RAMAN NAGAR)
BANGALORE-560 005.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001
141
2. THE COMMISSIONER
AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS


NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN
THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1
UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT I.E., ANNEX-P, IN SO
FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER IN
SY.NO.30/6 & 30/7, K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM
HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, MEASURING 22 GUNTAS
AND 26 GUNTAS RESPECTIVELY.
IN W.P.NO.55081/2014:
BETWEEN:
MR N. R. VENKATESHMURTHY
S/O SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
R/AT HOUSE NO.5,
THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA,
K. R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. R. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE)
142
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M. S. BUILDING
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE-560 020

BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-H AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55082/2014:
BETWEEN:
MR. R. MUNIRAJU
S/O SRI RAMAKRISHANAPPA
R/AT NO.28,
THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA,
BANGALORE
...PETITIONER
AND:

143
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGLORE-560020

BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS


NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55083/2014:
BETWEEN:
MR N. R. SRINIVASAPPA
SRI. RAMAKRISHANPPA,
R/AT NO.6, THANISANDRA VILLAGE
@ SARAYAPALYA,
K. R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M. S. BUILDING,
144

BANGALORE-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGLORE-560020

BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS


NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55436/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI R. VENKATARAMAN
S/O SRI. M. RAJENDRAN,
NO.45, JAYALAKSHMI NILAYA,
PANCHAVATI LAYOUT,
"VIDHYASAGAR",SARAI PALYA,
THANISANDRA,
BENGALURU-560 077.
2. SRI. N.D. NAGARAJ

S/O SRI. N.D. NARAYANA MURTHY,
NO.35 & 36,
PANCHAVATI LAYOUT,
"VIDHYASAGAR", SARAI PALYA,
THANISANDRA,
BENGALURU-560 077.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H. R. ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE )
145
AND:

VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKY ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 020
REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER
3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

SANKY ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN - K AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - M ISSUED BY R-2
& 1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55671/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI G. J. LAKSHMIPATHY
S/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH,
R/AT NO.28,
VENKATASWAMAPPA LAYOUT,
MUNIPUVANNA COMPOUND,
MANORAYANAPALYA,
R. T. NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 032
146
2. SRI G. R. NARAYANA SWAMY

S/O LATE G. A. RAMAIAH,
R/AT GORAMODAGU VILLAGE,
KOTHANUR POST,
SIDLAGHATTA TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT
PIN : 562 105
3. SRI. ABDUL LATIF

S/O BABA JAN,
R/AT NO.8,
MASJID COMPLEX,
NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD,
ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE-560 045
4. SMT. LINGAMMA
W/O LATE NANJAPPA,
R/AT NO.51,2ND MAIN,
4TH CROSS,DINNUR,R T NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 032
5. MRS A. DYANA
D/O H. AROKYARAJ,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/AT NO.19/3,
6TH CROSS,BHUVANESHWARINAGAR,
SULTANPALYA MAIN ROAD,
R. T. NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 032
6. SRI D. SAMSON
S/O A. DEVAN,
R/AT NO.4,3RD CROSS,
NANJAPPA GARDEN,
BABUSABPALYA,
KALYANNAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 043
147
7. MR M. KHADER PASHA
S/O LATE MOHAMMED SARVAR SAB,
R/AT NO.15,
NEAR VIVEKANANDA ENGLISH SCHOOL,
MARUTHI SAW MILL CROSS ROAD,
THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD,
DR S.R.K. NAGAR POST,
K. R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 077
8. SRI CHIKKANNA
S/O LATE BAJJE GOWDA,
9. SRI. HONNAPPA
S/O LATE BAJJE GOWDA,
PETITIONERS NO.8 AND 9

ARE R/AT NO.125,
BABU REDDY COMPOUND,
MANORAYANAPALYA,
BANGALORE-560 032
10. MR. S. ANWAR

S/O SYED IBRAHIM,
R/AT NO.722,
2ND MAIN, BHARATHNAGAR,
NEAR PIPE FACTORY,
BANGALORE-560 077
11. SRI M. RAMESH

S/O K MUNIYAPPA,
R/T NO.73,
SOMESHWARA LAYOUT,
SHIVA TEMPLE STREET,
BANGALORE-560 045
12. MR. MOHAMMED KHALEEL

S/O MOHAMMED IBRAHIM,
R/AT NO.17,
148
DASAPPA GARDEN,
NEAR HMT LAYOUT,
R. T. NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 032
13. MRS WAHEEIDA BANU

W/O MOHAMMED ISHAQ,
R/AT NO 8/3,
20TH CROSS,VIVIYANI ROAD,
SAGAYAPURAM,
FRAZER TOWN,
BANGALORE-560 005
14 . SRI S. MURUGAN
S/O SUBRAMANI,
R/AT NO.25/35,
RMV SECOND STAGE,
BOOPASANDRA,
BANGALORE-560 094
15. MR SYED JAMEEL

S/O SYED PEER,
R/AT NO.69,
VINAYAKA LAYOUT,
R. T. NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 032
16. SRI C. SRINIVASALU

S/O LAKSHMAIAH,
R/AT NO.994,
S. N. HALLI, B. NANJAPPA LAYOUT,
R. T. NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 032
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE )
AND:
REPRESENED BY ITS SECRETARY,
149
M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. S.G. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R2 AT ANN-S, DT. 18.06.2014, AS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL & THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE
EYE OF LAW & PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS
BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANN - S AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56203/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. GOPAL
S/O LATE BASAVAPUJARI,
RESIDING AT NO.10, 2ND CROSS,
KIRLOSKAR FOUNDRY,
OPP TO ISKON TEMPLE,
WEST OF CHORD ROAD,
BANGALORE-22.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. N. SURESH, ADVOCATE )
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M. B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE)

150

ENDORSEMENT DATED 08.10.2013, ISSUED BY THE
RESPONDENT VIDE ANN - H TO THE W.P. AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56300/2014:
BETWEEN:
MR K. V. THOMAS
S/O LATE VARKEY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.222
2ND A CROSS, 1ST STAGE
2ND BLOCK
HBR LAYOUT
BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHANDRA SHEKAR R., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE- 560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
151

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE
PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERNED VIDE ANN - E AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56350/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT MUNIYAMMA
W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
R/O SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. P SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE )
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS


152
NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. UDD/426/MNJ/2011, BANGALORE

DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R1 (ANNEXURE-E), IN SO FAR AS
IT RELATES TO LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 6 GUNTAS IN SURVEY
NO. 6/5B OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, (SCHEDULE PROPERTY) AT
SL.NO.934 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL
IN W.P.NO.56646/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI DODDAKALLAPPA
S/O LATE DODDACHIKKANNA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
2. SRI A. G. SRINIVASAMURTHY
S/O LATE DODDACHIKKANNA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
AMRUTHA HALLI
SAHAKARANAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560092
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE )
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
153
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, A.G.A FOR R-1)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-E), IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO THE LANDS TO AN EXTENT OF 14 GUNTAS (OUT OF
TOTAL EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 34 GUNTAS) IN SY.NO.43/2 AND TO
AN EXTENT OF 24 GUNTAS (OUT OF TOTAL EXTENT OF 3 ACRES
1 GUNTA) IN SY.NO.44/2 OF AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BELONGING TO
THE PETITIONERS AT SL.NOS.630 AND 632 OF THE SCHEDULE
APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND
GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56748/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI N. SHIVRAJ
S/O NARAYAN,
B-39, AIR STAFF QUARTERS,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE - 560 064
2. SRI G. BALAKRISHNA
S/O LATE SRI ANJAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SPT
AIR STAFF QUARTERS,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE - 560064
3. SRI SIDDARAMAPPA
S/O MALLESHAPPA,
SPT, ALL INDIA RADIO STAFF QUARTERS,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE - 560064
154
4. SRI A. MARY JULIANA

D/O ANTHU DAS, B-5,
ALL INDIA RADIO STAFF QUARTERS,
RMV EXTENSION,
BANGALORE - 560094
5. SRI R. MANJUNATH
S/O LATE RANGASWAMY,
B-36,SPT AIR STAFF QUARTERS,
ALL INDIA RADIO YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE - 560064
6. SMT. R. AMUDHA DEVI

W/O G.B BALAKRISHNAN,
NO.146, RISALDAR STREET,
SESHADRIPURAM,
BANGALORE 560020
7. SRI V.S. RAMESH

S/O V.N. SATHYANARAYANA,
NO. 60-B, 4TH BLOCK,
RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE
8. SRI S. RAVINDRA RAO

S/O LATE M. SUBRAMANI RAO,
B-11, SPT ALL INDIA RADIO QUARTERS,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE - 560064
9. SMT. SHAKUNTHALA
S/O SRI RACHAPPA,
NO.72, 5TH MAIN,
VASANTH NAGAR,
HIGH GROUNDS,
BANGALORE
10. SMT.D. NAGARATHNA
W/O SRI M.C. SRINIVASA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
34, 1ST MAIN, GANGAPPA BLOCK,
155
GANGANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560032
11. SRI K.B. GIRISH

S/O BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,
NO.11, WHITE HOUSE,
13TH CROSS, KAVERI LAYOUT,
GM PLAYA, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST,
BANGALORE - 560075
12. SRI M. GOPINATH

S/O C. MUNISWAMY,
NO U 454, 6TH CROSS,
MSR NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560054
13. SMT. T. KALAVATHY

W/O RAVIKUMAR,
NO.17, PANCHAVATI LAYOUT,
2ND PHASE, SARAIPALYA,
THANISANDRA, VIDYA SAGAR,
BANGALORE.
14. SRI S. VENI

W/O S RAVICHANDAR,
NO. 1288, B BLOCK,
VIJANAPUR,
DOORAVANI NAGAR,
BANGALORE
15. SRI B. GUNASHEKAR

S/O LATE BALAKRISHNAN,
NO.14, 6TH CROSS,
SOCIETY STREET,
SWATANTRA NAGAR,
SRIRAMAPURAM,
BANGALORE - 560021
16. SMT.K.C. RAMANI

W/O LATE K.P RAGHAVAN,
NO. 356, SAI KRUPA LAKSHMI
156
8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN, IISC LAYOUT,

JRD TATA NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560092
17. SRI PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY

S/O GANGA REDDY,
NO BTM 2795
KOLAR MAIN ROAD,
BANGARPET
18. SRI RAJAGOPALA REDDY

S/O GANGA REDDY,
NO BTM 2795
KOLAR MAIN ROAD,
BANGARPET
19. SRI EZHIL VENU

S/O S. VENUGOPAL,
NO. 83, 9TH CROSS,
KARAMCHAND LAYOUT,
LINGARAJPURAM,
BANGALORE
20. MRS. K. RAMANI

W/O SRI K.N. SHANKARANARAYANA,
A TYPE, NO.160, BEML QUARTERS
BEML NAGAR PO
KGF
21. SRI S.M. THYAGARAJA

S/O LATE MALLAIAH,
NO 32/2, 2ND B MAIN, 2ND BLOCK,
RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560020
22. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR

S/O ANJINAPPA,
BULLHALLI, HAROHALLI POST,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BANGALORE
157
23. SRI B.V. GANGADHAR

S/O VENKATA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
MRS. B.S. BABY KALA,
W/O SRI B.V GANGADHAR,
NO.2, ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET,
JC NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560006
24. SMT. MANIK BAI

W/O GUNDAPPA,
A TYPE, NO.14, BEML QUARATERS,
KGF
25. SRI S SATHISH

S/O SRI SATHYANARAYANA SETTY Y
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
141/A, NAKSHA"S, 3RD MAIN, 2ND STAGE,
AGB LAYOUT,
SARASWATHIPURAM,
BANGALORE - 560086
26. SMT. ANITHA

W/O SHAMU NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
NO 195, A TYPE,
BEML NAGAR POST,
KGF
27. SRI. GAJENDRA KUMAR

S/O NAGAPPA ROJED,
NO. 129, A TYPE,
BEML QUARTERS,
BEML NAGAR POST,
KGF
28. SRI. RAMADAS

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
NO 8, 1ST CROSS, 1ST BLOCK,
CHEWADAPPA LAYOUT,
K NARAYANAPURA ROAD,
HEGDE NAGAR,
BANGALORE 560077
158
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H R ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADV)
AND:

VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 020

SANKEY ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL ALONG WITH
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - L AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION PASSED DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - N
ISSUED BY R-1 AND R-2 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57076/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAMESH HERALE

S/O SRI LATE NAGAPPA HERALE,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
159
2. SRI GANESH HERALE

S/O SRI NAGAPPA HERALE
3. SRI UMESH HERALE

S/O SRI LATE NAGAPPA HERALE,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
ALL ARE R/O RACHENAHALLI

SHAVARAMA KARANTH
LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMETN, M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

K. P. WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST,


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - E THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT
LAND IN SURVEY NO. 105/2B [I ACRE 12 GUNTAS] OF
RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
160
IN W.P.NO.57117/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. MR SUBBANNA
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
2. MR.CHIKKASUBBANNA
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
3. MR.NARASIMHA
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
4. MR.RAJANNA
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
5. MR.HANUMANTHA
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
6. MR.MUNIRAJU
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
PETITIONERS 1 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS

OF AMRUTHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
SAHAKARANAGARA POST,
BANGALORE-560 094.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE FOR P1, 2, 5 & 6)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
161
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMNT AUTHORITY

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE.

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUHTORITY,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - D THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT
LAND IN SURVEY NO. 55/[15 GUNTAS], 47/7 [01 ACRE 32
GUNTAS], 53/3 [01 ACRE 32 GUNTAS], 53/2 [14 GUNTAS], 54[15
GUNTAS] OF LANDS IN DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM
HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57150/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT JEEVANAMMA
W/O SRI CHOWRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
R/A SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.N. SHETTY, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. M.K. SRIVARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
M S BUILDING
162
BANGALORE-560001

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. K.N. PUTTE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LAND
ACQUISITION PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AS
WELL AS FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PROPOSING
THE ACQUISITION OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.40/1
MEASURING 5 GUNTAS OUT OF 4 ACRES 37 GUNTAS SITUATED
AT SRIRAMPURAM VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE
NORTH TQ., BANGALORE DIST., BELONGS TO THE PETITIONER
HEREIN VIDE ANNX-H & K BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57605/2014:
BETWEEN:
MRS KANTHAMMA
W/O SRI V. NAGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE
HEBBAL, BANGALORE - 560024
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D.,
SRI. RAJASHEKAR B KANAVI,
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K., ADVOCATES)
163
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE -560001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX -C THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO FAR AS
THE SUBJECTION LAND IN SY. NO. 54 (0 ACRE 23 GUNTAS) OF
LAND IN DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57606/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. MR. A. G. RAMAKRISHNA
S/O GANGAPPA,
2. MR. A. G. RAGHURAMAIAH
S/O GANGAPPA,

AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE,
164
B.B. ROAD, YELAHANKA HOBLI,

BANGALORE-560 092.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE AND
SRI.CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K., ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-020.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX - C THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE
SUBJECTION LAND IN SY. NO. 47/4 (1 ACRE 8 GUNTAS) OF LAND
IN AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE
NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 58859/2014

BETWEEN:
GOVINDARAJU
SON OF LATE THIMMAIAH,
RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE,
YELAHNKA HOBLI,
165

BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. P. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE )
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTIY,
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE
FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-F DATED
18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS
HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER
TO ISSUE ANN-F, THEN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT
ANN-H DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 59794/2014

BETWEEN:
SMT. JAYAMMA
W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
JAKKUR POST
166
YELAHANKA
BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONER
BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEX - C AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 60012/2014

BETWEEN:
SRI RAMAIAH
S/O LATE MUTHURAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1308
RAMAIAH GARDEN
VIDYASAGARA, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD
DR. SHIVARAMKARANTH NAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
167
(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE )
AND:
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001

SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE-560020

SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS


RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE ENDORSEMENT DROPPING THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.84/7
MEASURING 10 GUNTAS SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK IN TERMS OF THE
FINAL REPORT DATED 26.10.2011 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 622/2015
BETWEEN:
SMT CHANNAMMA
W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE
K R PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE-560018
...PETITIONER
168
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. K.A. ARIGA , ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED IS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

ANNEX - D IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND
IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 685/2015

BETWEEN:
M. RAJAGOPAL
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O LATE V MUNIVENKATAPPA
RESIDING AT NO. 733
PATEL MUNIVENKATAPPA LAYOUT
NAGARAVA
BANGALORE-560045
...PETITIONER
169
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS


ANNEX - E IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND
ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 1958/2015

BETWEEN:
SMT. P. SHYLAJA
W/O LATE SRI. T.A. RENUKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/AT NO.43, 1ST FLOOR,
PAPANNA BLOCK, 13TH CORSS,
RBI MAIN COLONY ROAD,
GANGANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560024
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. S. SHASHIBHUSHAN, ADVOCATE)
170
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU - 560 020
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE )

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT /BDA TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S PLIGHT
AND TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION BY ALLOTTING AN EQUIVALENT
SITE OF THE SAME DEMENSIONS IN THE SAME WITHOUT ANY
EXTRA COST AND EXECUTE NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION IN
THIS BEHALF WITHIN 7 DAYS AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 2462/2015

BETWEEN:
SRI SARDAR AHMED

SON OF SRI.K.ABDUL RAHIM,
RESIDING AT 23, NANDI VIEW LAYOUT,
DINNUR MAIN ROAD,
R.T.NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560032.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE)
AND:

REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

171
(LAND ACQUISITION)
BANGALORE-560020.

BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4)

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AS PER ANNX - E AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AS PER ANNX - F IN RESPECT
OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY; AWARD DATED 08.07.2004 AND
AWARD DATED 18.10.2004 AS PER ANNX - G & H; THE
POSSESSION MAHAZAR DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS DATED
06.11.2004 AS PER ANNX - J & K RESPECTIVELY BY GIVING
EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR
COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION
REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 4591/2015

BETWEEN:
1. GOVINDAMMA
W/O MR RAMAIAH,
2. SRINIVAS
S/O MR. RAMAIAH,
3. NAGRAJ
S/O MR. RAMAIAH,
4. CHANDRU
S/O MR. RAMAIAH,
172
5. YASHODAMMA
D/O MR. RAMAIAH,
6. VENKATESH
S/O MR. RAMAIAH,
ALL RESIDING AT NO.80,

K R PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE-77
AND ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR

GPA HOLDER G. SHANTARAJ
S/O LATE B. N. GURUMURTHY REDDY
R/AT NO.161, 8TH STREET,
BANK AVENUE, KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-43.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE FOR P2 - P6 )
AND:

M S BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001,
BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUHTORITY,

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
173
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL ALONG WITH


ANNEX - L IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED OR IN
THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 5228/2015

BETWEEN:
MR.P.V.CHANDRAN
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE P V MADHAVAN
RESIDING AT #141, BLOCK NO.20
(FORMED IN SURVEY NO.17/1 HENNUR VILLAGE)
ARKAVATHI BDA LAYOUT
BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K.N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
K P WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020

NORTH DIVISION
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
K. P. WEST, BANGALORE - 560020

NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX
R. T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032

NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX
R T NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032
174

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3;

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ALLEGED
DENOTIFICATION PROCESS OF R-1 DENOTIFYING ESPECIALLY
THE PETITIONER PROPERTY MORE FULLY EVIDENT IN ANNX - L
DATED 12.11.2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 5664/2015
BETWEEN:
1. SMT BATHULA BEGUM

W/O JANAB NUSARATH PASHA,
2. SRI. JANAB NUSRATH PASHA

S/O ALIJANABSATTARALIAS BABASAHIB,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.63,
PILLANNA GARDEN,
3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 045,
ALSO RESIDING AT NO.405,
406, NEEKADRI MAHAL
APARTMENTS BLOCK,
NO.45/6, NANDIDURGA ROAD,
BANGALORE.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. SURESH, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. SRIDHARA D. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001,
REPT. BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
175
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20.
3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

BDA, CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PRAK WEST,
BANGALORE-20.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K.N. PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

RESPONDENTS AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE
REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED
15.11.2014 FOR DE-NOTIFICATION OR RE-CONVEYANCE OF THE
PETITIONERS LAND AS PER VIDE ANNX - A & A1 & B TO THIS
WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 6735/2015

BETWEEN:
SRI GURUPADAPPA NAGAMARPALLI

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O LATE SANGANBASAPPA NAGAMARPALLI
R/AT NO. 322,
SARASWATHI NILAY 3RD MAIN,
5TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R T NAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 032
...PETITIONER
AND:

176
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEX - H AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 6981/2015
BETWEEN:
1. MRS.KUNJAMMA SAMUEL
W/O LATE A J SAMUEL,
2. MRS. LENY ROY,

D/O LATE A J SAMUEL,
W/O MR. ROY PHILIP,
BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR

GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
MR.JOSEPH ABRAHAM,
S/O MR.ABRAHAM,
R/AT NO.306, 7M, 80 FT, ROAD,
177
HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANA NAGAR,

BENGALURU-560 043.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M S BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001,
BENGALURU DEVLEOPMENT AUTHOIRTY,
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-0560 020.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

BENGALURU DEVLEOPMENT AUTHOIRTY,
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M. N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS QUASHING THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & R-3 AS PER ANNEX - G
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & 3
VIDE ANNEX-H AND MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & 3 VIDE ANNEX - J, IN RESPECT
OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND DECLARE THAT THE
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX - G, H & J
HAVE LAPSED AND HAVE BECOME INOPERATIVE IN VIEW OF
SECTION 24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND
TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND
RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT NO. 30 OF 2013).
178
IN W.P. NO.7248/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. MARUTHI BADAVANE NAGAREEKA

KSHEMABHIVRUDHI SAMITHI,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT MR RAJANNA B.
O/AT NO.402, JAGNANESHWARI NILAYA,
9TH CROSS, MARUTHI LAYOUT,
DASRAHALLI HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-24.
...PETITIONER
AND:
REPRESETNED BY ITS SECRETARY,
BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20.

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K.N. PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE AND

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX
- J AND ETC.
179
IN W.P. NO. 7277/2015,

BETWEEN:
SRI. MARUTHI BADAVANE NAGAREEKA

KSHEMABHIVRUDHI SAMITHI
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT MR. RAJANNA - B.
O/AT NO.402, JAGANANESHWARI NILAYA
9TH CROSS, MARUTHI LAYOUT,
DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-24
...PETITIONER
AND:
BANGALORE-01
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-20

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - K AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 7326/2015,

BETWEEN:
SRI. INNESHAPPA
180

S/O LATE CHOWRAPPA
R/AT MESTRI PALYA
HAMLET VILLAGE,
RACHENAHALLI, K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE
REPRESENTED BY HIS
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
JUANNES @ JOHN,
SON OF LATE Y. CHINNAPPA,
RESIDING AT #41,
SAI KRUPA APARTMENT,
5TH FLOOR, VISHWANATHA NAGENAHALLI,
R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032.
...PETITIONER
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPEMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.

BANGALORE DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
181

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - F AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.8277/2015:
BETWEEN:
MRS. JETHRONICA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
W/O MR. GABRIEL
R/AT NO.89, N.M. REDDY
ROAD, MARIYANAPALYA
H.A. FARM POST
(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, ADVOCATE )
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING

BANGALORE - 560 020

AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

182
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY R1

AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.8278/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT AROKIA MARY

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
W/O LATE ALPHONSE RAJ
R/AT NO. 138, GARE CHINNAPPA
LAYOUT, MARIYANPALAYA,
H.A. FARM POST,
2. SRI. C. ANTHONYSWAMY
S/O LATE CHINNAPPA
R/AT MARIYANAPALYA,
H.A. FARM POST,
3. SRI. A. CHINNAPPA
S/O AROGYAPPA
R/AT MARIYANPALYA,
H.A. FARM POST,
4. SRI. K. VENKATESHAPPA
S/O T.K. KODANDAPPA
R/AT MARIYANPALYA,
H.A. FARM POST,
5. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA
W/O LATE LAWRENCE
R/AT MARIYANPALYA,
H.A. FARM POST,
...PETITIONERS
183
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING,

BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-E ISSUED BY THE
R-1 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND IN
RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
IN W.P. NO.9135/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. SYED ZAKRI HUSSAIN

S/O S. RAHAMATUMAIAH,
NO.9/562, AGADI STREET,
AMEENPEER ROAD
CUDDAPAH - 516 001.
2. K.S. DILSHAD BEGUM
W/O K.S. RAFIUDDIN,
NO.12, 2ND MAIN BYRAPPA
184
LAYOUT, NEAR RASHEEDYA

MASJID, GOVINDAPURA,
BENGALURU - 560 045.
3. SRI N.K. RAM MOHAN

S/O N.S. KRISHNACHARI,
R/AT NEHA NILAYA, NO.13
SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT,
KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA
POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.
4. SRI. S. JAI PRASAD

S/O LATE M. SIVARAJ,
R/AT NO.439, 5TH "B" MAIN,
2ND BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT,
KALYANANAGAR
5. SRI G. CHANDRACHAR
S/O T.H. GANGADHARACHAR,
R/AT NO.13,NEHA NILAYA,
SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT,
KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA
6. SMT. LALITHA BAI

W/O A. VEERA RAGHAVALU,
I FLOOR, MAGADI ROAD,
7. SRI RAVINDRA BABY

S/O S. KRISHNAIAH,
R/AT NO.814, 10TH "A" AMIN,
INDIRA NAGARA, I STAGE,
185
8. SRI A. RIZAUDEEN
S/O ASHRAF ALI,
R/AT NO.12, DEFENCY LAYOUT
BHARAT NAGAR, SHIVARAMA
KARANTH NAGAR POST,
9. SRI R.SARAMA BEGUM

W/O A. RIAZUDEEN,
R/AT NO.12,DEFENCY LAYOUT
BHARAT NAGAR, SHIVARAMA
KARANTH NAGAR POST,
10. SRI C. KALINGAIAH

S/O CHAMAIAH,
R/AT NO. 247, 12 "A" CROSS,
1ST "B" MAIN ROAD,
W.C ROAD, 2ND STAGE,
MAHALAKSHMI PURAM POST,
11. SRI G. SURENDRANATH

S/O LATE K. GOPALA PILLAI,
R/AT NO.B-15, KHB LAY OUT,
PUTTENAHALLI, YALAHANKA,
12. SMT. M. VIJAYA KUAMRI

W/O M. DHANA SINGH,
R/AT NO.48, 2ND MAIN,
VIVEKANAGAR POST,
13. SMT. E. KAMALA MANOGARAN

W/O MANOGARAN,
R/AT NO 2 FRIENDS LAYOUT,
CHANNAPPANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
186
MARATHAHALLI POST,
14. SMT. MADHURI ADIGA

W/O A.R ASHOK KUMAR ADIGA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YFEARS,
R/AT NO.288, 3RD "A" CROSS,
2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
W.O.C ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.
15. SMT. V.S. AMARAVENMATHY

W/O R. RAMAN,
R/AT NO.21/1 DEFENCE LAYOUT,
3RD CROSS, THANISANDRA
MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
16. SRI SYED AHMED

S/O NISAR AHMED
R/AT NO.21/2, DEFENCY LAYOUT,
3RD CROSS, THANISANDRA MAIN
ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
17. SRI NAVEED AHMED

S/O NISAR AHMED
R/AT NO.21/2, DEFENCY LAYOUT,
3RD CROSS, THANSANDAR MAIN
ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
18. SRI. S KUMAR

S/O LATE SRINIVAS
R/AT NO.45, 2ND CROSS,
SRI SAIBABA NAGAR
SRIRAMPURA,
19. SRI K KOTHANDARAMAN

S/O V KANNIPPAN
R/AT NO.NEW NO.38, OLD NO.245
9TH MAIN, MATHIKERE NEW
EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 054.
187
20. TAJA PASHA

S/O LAND CHAND PASHA
R/AT NO.23/106/B, 2ND MAIN,
8TH CROSS, KUPPASWAMY LAYOUT,
NAGAVARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
21. SMT SEEMA BANU

W/O TAJ PASHA
R/AT NO.23/106/B, 2ND MAIN,
8TH CROSS, KUPPASWAMY LAYOUT
NAGAVARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
22. SMT SHANAZ BEGUM

W/O ZAKIR HUSSAIN,
R/AT NO.58 YEARS, GOVINDAPURA,
UMARNAGAR, 4THCROSS,
A.C. POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.
23. SMT ZAKIRA BEGUM

W/O LATE JAMSHEED
R/AT NO.25 3RD CROSS, DEFENCY LAYOUT,
NEAR FATHIMA MAJID
24. SRI S KRISHNA MURTHY

S/O LATE S SINGARAM,
R/AT NO.3/1, MES QUARTERS,
GANGADHARA CHETTY ROAD,
SHIVAN CHETTY GARDEN POST,
25. SRI M MAHBOOB ALI

S/O LATE V M MOHAMMED ALI
R/AT NO.23, B TYPE,
ROPERTSONROAD,
188
FRASER TOWN,
26. SRI M AKBER ALI

S/O LATE V M MOHAMMED ALI,
R/AT NO.23, B TYPE,
ROPERTSON ROAD,
FRASER TOWN,
27. SRI YOUSUF ALI

S/O LATE T M MOHAMMED ALI,
R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSON
ROAD, FRASER TOWN,
28. SRI EQBAL ALI

S/O LATE T M MOHAMMED ALI,
R/AT NO.23, B TYPE,
ROPERTSON ROAD,
FRASER TOWN,
29. SMT YASMEEN SULTANA

W/O AKHI KHAN,
R/AT NO.32, 3RD CROSS
DEFENCY LAYOUT,
30. SRI MOHAMMED ABDULLA

W/O S HAMIM AHMED
DEFENCY LAYOUT,
31. SRI MOHAMMED ZEYAULLA

W/O S HAMIM AHMED,
189
DEFENCY LAYOUT,
32. SRI. R KANICKRAJ

W/O S RAJENDIRAN,
R/AT NO.1 TERESA 2ND CROSS,
RANGANATHA LAYOUT,
MAHADEVAPURA,
33. SRI. K.M.M. ABDUL KADAR

W/O K MOIDIN BEARY,
R/AT NO.103, MANASABA PALACE,
SULTANPALYA MAIN ROAD,
R.T. NAGAR POST,
34. SRI. BONDU RAMA SWAMY

W/O MUSALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT... YEARS,
R/AT N.306, 9TH C MAIN,
I CROSS, 1ST BLOCK,
HRBR LAYOUT,
KALYAN NAGAR,
35. SRI. I KUMARAN MOOSAD

S/O I RAMAN MOOSAD,
R/AT NO.91, G BLOCK,
SAHAKARA NAGARA,
36. SRI N K GOPI

S/O N.S. KRISHNACHARI,
R/AT NO.13, NEHA NILAYA,
SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT,
KODEGIHALLI,
SAHAKARANAGAR POST,
190
37. SRI. A SUBRAMANYAM

S/O A SESHAIAH,
R/AT NO.33, OFFICERS QUARTERS,
BEML NAGAR POST,
K.G.F. - 563 115
38. SRI FAIROZ BAIG

S/O LATE AMEERJAN,
D.V. BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR,
39. SRI. SHAKEEL SAIT
S/O ABDUL RAHMAN SAIT,
R/AT NO.209, 9TH B MAIN ROAD,
2ND CROSS, VIJAYANAGARA,
40. SRI MAHAMED AHSWAR

S/O NASEER AHMED,
R/AT NO.S2, S.K. HOUSE,
2ND FLOOR, NO.661, ST MAIN ROAD,
GANGANAGAR EXTENSION,
41. SRI NOOR JAHAN

S/O NASEER AHMED,
WATCHMAKER, R/AT NO.S2
S.K. HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR
NO.661, ST MAIN ROAD,
42. SRI ASHOK VARDHAN

S/O SUBEDAR SHAMLAL,
R/AT NO.SHYAM HOSPITAL AND
RESEARCH CENTRE,
KARHALLI ROAD, BENGARPET,
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114.
...PETITIONERS
191
(BY SRI. VISHWAJITH SHETTY S, ADV.)
AND:
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU - 20.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU - 20.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3 )
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF

ANNX-A.
IN W.P. NO.9278/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI M. RAGHUKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
S/O LATE C MUNIKRISHNAPPA.
2. SRI. C. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA
192
3. SRI C. VENKATARAM
4. C. SRINIVASAMURTHY
ALL RESIDING NEAR

LAKSHMINARAYNASWAMY TEMPLE
SAHAKARANAGAR POST, AMRUTHAHALLI
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING

AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020

…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F ISSUED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE
CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
193
IN W.P. NO.9488/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI MUNIYAPPA
S/O POOJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.104, VIDYASAGAR
(SARAI PALYA), THANISANDRA
MAIN ROAD, SRK NAGAR POST
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. NARENDRA G. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3

NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.9576/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. M GOPAL
194
2. M RAGHAVENDRA
3. M UDAYKUMAR
4. M HARISHKUMAR
ALL SONS OF SRI. MUNIYAPPA

S/O POOJAPPA,
R/AT NO.104 VIDYASAGAR
(SARAI PALYA)THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD,
SRK NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560077
…PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M S BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

195
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - F IN SO FAR AS

THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC
IN W.P. NO.10923/2015
BETWEEN:
SRI D. VENKATA KRISNAPPA

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
S/O LATE DASAPPA
R/AT NO.627,
NEW HOUSING COLONY , I. I. S. C.,
BANGALORE - 560 012
...PETITIONER
AND:

DEPT. OF HOUSING &
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M. S. BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPT BY ITS SECRETARY

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - J DATED
18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R -1 AND ETC.
196
IN W.P. NO.11344/2015
BETWEEN:
SRI. J.K. JAGADISH

S/O LATE J M KRISHNAPPA,
R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE,
YELAHNAKA HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. MAHESH, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
4. METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE
HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001
5. BANGALORE METROPOLITAN
PLANNING AUTHORITY,
BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
BBMP COMPLEX,
J.C. ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
197

SRI. B.V. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SRI. V.Y. KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4)
RESPONDENT NO.5 IS DELETED
VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2015

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.13201/2015
BETWEEN:
1. SRI NANJAPPA
S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA,
2. SRI.MUNINARAYANA
S/O LATE K. SONNAPPA,
3. SMT.KANAKAMMA
W/O LATE M.NAGARAJA,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT

DASARAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R PURAM HOBLI,
HA FARM POST,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 024
4. SMT. GODHA R
W/O SRI RAMAPRASAD
NO.691,VISHNUCHITTA, 5TH CROSS,
8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT,
DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST,
BANGALORE - 560 024
198
5. SMT. S. M. JAYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
W/O SRI H. K. RANGANATHAN,
RESIDING AT NO.692,
SRIRANGADHAMA,
MARUTHI LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560 024.
6. SRI N. RAJENDRA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
NO.1,5TH CROSS,
8TH MAIN,MARUTHI LAYOUT,
POST BANGALORE-560 024.
7. SRI V. ANANDA
SON OF SRI G. VENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
NO.6, 5TH CROSS,
DASARAHALLI,HA FARM POST,
BANGALORE-560 024.
8. SMT. SOSAMMA THOMAS

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
W/O SRI M. C. THOMAS
MARUTHI LAYOUT,DASARAHALLI,
HA FARM POST,
BANGALORE-560 024.
9. SRI GIRIJA B. S.
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
SON OF LATE SREENIVASA MURTHY B. M.
NO.4, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,
MARUTHI LAYOUT,DASARAHALLI,
HA FARM POST,
BANGALORE-560 024.
10 . SRI M. C. ARBRAHAM,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
SON OF SRI M. L. CHERIAN,
NO.2, 5TH CROSS,
199
DASARAHALLI,HA FARM POST,

BANGALORE-560 024.
11 . MRS ELIZABETH ANNA JOHN

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
D/O REV. E. C. JOHN
NO.5, 5TH CROSS
8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT
DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST
BANGALORE - 24
12 . SRI ANILA S
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O DR. SURYANARAYANA K
NO.3,7,10, 5TH CROSS
BANGALORE - 24
13 . SMT RAMYA SATYANARAYANA

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
W/O SRI ARUN S
NO.2, 5TH CROSS
BANGALORE - 560024
REPRESENTED BY HIS SPA HOLDER
AND BROTHER IN LAW SRI. ANILA S.
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
S/O DR K. SURYANARAYANA
NO.11, NAGAPPA STREET
SHESHADRIPURAM
BANGALORE - 560020
14 . SMT SHASHI KARTHIKEYAN

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
W/O SRI D KARTHIKEYAN
NO.8, 5TH CROSS
8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT,
BANGALORE - 560024
15 . SRI RAGHUNAND C,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O SRI C. CHIKKANNA
NO.9, 5TH CROSS
200

BANGALORE - 560024.
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE- 560001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - S ISSUED BY THE
R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.14944/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. DR. M. NARAYANAPPA
S/O LATE SRI. M. ANJANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
R/AT HOUSE NO.229, 6TH B MAIN,
10TH CROSS, HMT LAYOUT,
R.T. NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560002
201
2. SRI. RAJESH KUMAR

S/O SRI. SAHJANANDA PRASAD
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT NO.7/2,
MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT,
1ST MAIN, HEBBAL,
KEMPAPURA,
BANGALORE-560024
3. LALTI KUMARI
W/O SRI. SAHJANANDA PRASAD
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO.7/2,
1ST MAIN, HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA,
BANGALORE-560024
4. SMT. PREMA V.
W/O M.N. NAGARAJA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/AT HOUSE NO.3,
1ST CROSS,
NEAR SINDHI COLLEGE OUT ROAD,
BANGALORE-560024
5. SRI. SUBBARAMAIAH
S/O SRI. D.P. ASHWATHANARAYANAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO.2, SRINILAYA,
1ST CROSS,KUVEMPU MAIN ROAD,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE-24
6. AZEEZUNNISA
W/O ABDUL KHAYUM
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.6, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
MUNISWAMY GOWDER LAYOUT,
HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE-560024
7. SMT. KHORESHA KHATOON

W/O SRI. H. ANSARI
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT NO.16/B,
202
1ST MAIN ,2ND CROSS,

OPP: SINDHI COLLEGE,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA,
BANGALORE-560024
8. SRI. PONNUSWAMY
S/O SRI. MALAYAN
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT C/O NARASIMHASWAMY HOUSE,
NO.96/1,10TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
GANGANAGARA, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK,
GANGANAGARA,
BANGALORE-560024
9. SRI. CHINNU
S/O SRI. MALAYAN
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT C/O NARASIMHASWAMY HOUSE,
NO.96/1, 10TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
GANGANAGARA, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK,
GANGANAGARA
BANGALORE-560024
10 . MR. ALI HUSSAIN KHAN

S/O LATE ALIMKHAN
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/AT C/O A.K. WELCOME STORES,
NO.2,KEMPAPURA MAIN ROAD,
HEBBAL POST,
BANGALORE-560024
11 . SRI. M.N. NARAYANA RAJU

S/O SRI. RAMARAJU
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO.2, KEMPAPURA
HEBBAL POST,
BANGALORE-560024
12 . SRI. SOHAN SHARMA

S/O SRI. TEJ NARAYAN SHARMA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/AT NO.30, BISHEWARA LAYOUT,
NEAR RAILWAY LINE,
NAGASHETTY HALLI,
BANGALORE-560094
203
13 . SRI. RAJAVEL
S/O LATE SUBRAMANI
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
SECURITY OFFICE OF THE
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001
14 . SRI. B.R. PAPANNA

S/O B.P. RAMAKRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
HOUSE NO.201, 1ST BLOCK,
POLICE QUARTERS,
BRIYAND SQUIRE,
MYSORE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560002
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEPARTMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560001

T. CHOUDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20

T. CHOUDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. BASAVARAJA H.T., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

204
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND

(3) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, DATED 03.02.2003
AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, PRODUCED
AT ANNEXURE -A & ANNEXURE - B PASSED BY R - 2, R-1 IN SO
AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER SITUATED IN SY.NO.28/2
AND SY.NO.28/3, IN KEMPAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.17240/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT MANJULA
W/O LATE H T MANJUNATH
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.97
'A' BLOCK
HEBBAL H A FARM POST
BENGALURU-560024
2. SMT SHANTHAKUMARI
W/O KRISHNA B. M.
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.97
'A' BLOCK
HEBBAL H A FARM POST
BENGALURU-560024
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. B. AJIT, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRSENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO HOUSING &
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001

205
SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE-560020

SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VINAY DEVARAJ,
SRI. VIKRAM A. HULIGOL,
SRI. M.N. RAAMAJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATES
FOR R2 & 3)

NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONERS
DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN - D AND
ETC.
IN W.P. NO.18814/2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT KEMPAMMA
W/O. LATE SRI. KALEGOWDA,
NO.145,DHANISANDRA VILLAGE,
SHIVARAMKARANTH NAGAR POST,
K.R. PURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE 560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. MURALI BABU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
206
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560001

BANGALORE - 560020

K.P WEST EXTENSION,
BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRLY.
NOTIFICATION PASSED U/S.17(1) OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT ACT 1978 DATED 03.02.2003, AT ANN - B, &
CONSEQUENTLY THE FINAL NOTIFICATION PASSED UNDER
SEC.19(1) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1978
DATED 23.02.2004, AT ANN - C IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S LAND
ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.19213/2015
BETWEEN:
1. B. M. GANAPATHI
S/O B.K.MACHAIAH,
NO.44, MURTHYUN NELLAYA
11TH CROSS, ATMANANDA COLONY
R.T.NAGAR P.O.
BANGALORE-32.
2. JACOB MATHEW
S/O N.J. MATHEW
NO.22, VINAYAKANAGAR,
SADARAMMA LAYOUT,
(NEAR RAILWAY TRACK
207
GEDDALAHALLI)
KALANAGAR P.O.
BANGALORE-560 043.
3. A.THOMAS
S/O A ARICASWAMY
SHARADAMMA LAYOUT,
NEAR RAILWAY TRACK
GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O.
BANGALORE-560 043.
4. N.PURUSHOTHAM
S/O NARASAPPA,
SHARADAMMA LAYOUT,
NEAR RAILWAY TRACK
GEDDALAHALLI,
KALANAGAR P.O.
BANGALORE-560 043.
5. KUMAR VELAN
S/O MANI,
NO.4, VINAYAKA NAGAR,
SHARADAMMA LAYOUT,
NEAR RAILWAY TRACK
GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O.
BANGALORE-560 043.
6. SHARADAMMA
W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
REPRESENTED BY HER
POWER OF ATTORNEY E.LALITHA,
W/O SRI.JAYASHANKARA REDDY,
R/AT NO.1, GEDDAHALLI VILLAGE
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
7. E.NARASIMHA REDDY
S/O MUNIREDDY,
R/AT NO.9, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,
208
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
8. R.M.ASLAM
S/O LATE ABDUL RAHIMAN,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
9. MRS. AVRIL PATRICK

W/O MR.PATRICK,
R/AT NO.17,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
10 . A.SHARADAMMA
W/O N.RAMAMURTHY,
R/AT NO.18 & 19,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
11 . ANNIE MATHEW
W/O MR.MATHEW KUTTY,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
12 . A.SUBBAREDDY
S/O PEDAPPA REDDY,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
13 . SUBBAMMA
RANGAREDDY,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
209
14 . G.KODANDA RAMA REDDY

S/O MR.BODI REDDY,
R/AT NO.36 & 37,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK. ...PETITIONERS

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
4. THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN

PLANNING COMMITTEE
BBMP HEAD OFFICE,
J.C.ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - Z AND ETC
IN W.P. NO.20191/2015:
BETWEEN:
SOCIETY OF DAUGHTERS OF
210
ST. CAMILLUS A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER

THE KARNATAKA SOCIEITES REGISTRATION ACT,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT:
HENNUR MAIN ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGLAORE-560 043,
R/BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
SISTER ANILA KOMPUTHUKIL
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHIVAYOGI B HALLUR, ADVOCATE )
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVLEOPMENT AUTHORITY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,
3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER,

BANGALORE DEVLEOPMENT AUTHORITY,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 27.06.1978 ISSUED BY R - 2 PUBLISHED
IN THE GAZETTE ON 20.07.1978 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.24417/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.MUNIMARAMMA
211

W/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA,.
(SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
2. SRI C. SRIRAMA
S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA
3. C. SRINIVAS
S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA
4. C. PAPANNA
S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA,
ALL RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560 064
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020,
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

PLANNING AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
BBMP COMPLEX,
212
J.C. ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 )

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - H WITH THE
WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.24418/2015
BETWEEN:
1. SRI.C.SRIRAMA
2. C. SRINIVAS
3. C. PAPANNA
ALL RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILALGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-506 001.

213
KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
4. METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE
HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001,
5. BANGALORE METROPOLITAN
PLANNING AUTHORITY,
BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
BBMP COMPLEX,
J. C. ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
RESPONDENT NO.5 DELETED AS PER ORDER
OF THE COURT DATED 12/03/2018)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - L WITH THE WRIT
PETITION. (II) QUASH THE BULK ALLOTMENT ORDER DATED
01.06.2007 ISSUED BY THE R -2 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX -
G AS WELL AS THE APPROVAL OF THE R -1 DATED 19.12.2003
VIDE ANNX - E AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.28143/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. MR.KEWAL KISHAN SETH

S/O LATE BAVANDAS SETH,
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
214
2. MRS. PURNIMA SETH

W/O MR. KEWAL K SETH,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
3. MR. VIRESH SETH,

S/O MR. KEWAL K SETH,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
4. MR. NITESH SETH

S/O MR. KEWAL K. SETH,
ALL THE ABOVE MENTIONED

PERSONS ARE RESIDENTS OF
RICHARDSTRAFFE, 54-56,
22081 HAMBURG, GERMANY.
REPRESENTED BY POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.GYAN SINGH
BIST S/O GHEENA SINGH BIST,
RESIDING AT NO.4410, 4TH FLOOR,
HIGHPOINT IV, 45 PALACE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. GEETHA MENON, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

AUTHORITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISIONER,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION

BANGALORE-560 020
215
…RESPONDENTS
(BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA R1;
SRI. K. KRISNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE
RESPONDENTS IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS
MENTIONED AT SL.NO.9 AND 10 THEREIN ARE CONCERNED
VIDE ANN - A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.28673/2015
BETWEEN:
SHRI M.N. THYAGARAJ

S/O LATE V.S.NARAYANA SASTRY,
R/AT NO.5, 1 MAIN, 6TH CROSS,
MARUTHI EXTENSION,
RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD,
SRIRAMPURAM,
BENGALURU-560021.
...PETITIONER
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.

216

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND
RESPONDENT 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID
DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE
COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE
REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - N & P
RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY.
IN W.P. NO.28676/2015
BETWEEN:
SMT A. C. SHOBHA RANI

W/O G. CHANNAKESHAVA MURTHY,
R/AT NO.2753, 'E' BLOCK,
SHAHAKARA NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 092.
...PETITIONER
AND:

5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
217
KUMAR PARK WEST,

BENGALURU-560 020.

OFFICER,
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3 )

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & 2 TO
APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE
DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT & APEX COURT IN
BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY
CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS
ANNEXURE - P AND Q RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH
HER SOCIETY AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.28679/2015
BETWEEN:
SHRI P. B. AMRUNATHA PANICKER

S/O MR. P.KL. BAHULEYAN,
R/AT C/O K. RAJAGOPAL,
NO.302, BANASHANKARI, CORAL NO.20,
2ND CROSS,M.M. LAYOUT,
K.B. SANDRA,
R.T. NAGAR POST,
BENGALURU-560 032.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADV.)
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
218
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.

OFFICER,
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M B PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 )

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND R-1
& 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE
HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE
APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN
(2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE
PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE- L & M RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED
THROUGH HIS SOCIETY.
IN W.P. NO.29317/2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. RADHAMMA
W/O S. N. BACHANNA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT NO.108,
SRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA,
SAMPIGE HALLI,
JAKKUR POST,
YALAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONER
219
(BY SRI. Y. S. VEDHUKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-01

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA KRUPA WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA KRUPA WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA KRUPA WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 & R4)
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED
20.01.2015 VIDE ANNX - A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.29541/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI K. S. VITALAKSHA
S/O SRI MUDDAPPA,
RESIDING AT NO.80,
6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
WORK LAYOUT, SHANKARNAGAR,
BANGLAORE-560 096.
220
2. SRI K. P. ANANDA,
S/O SRI K. M. PRABHAKARA,
RESIDING AT NO.645,
BAPUJI COLONY, KENGERI POST,
BANGALORE-506 060.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K. M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE )
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-3

KUMARA PARK WEST,
(BY SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF
SITE NO. 71, SITUATED AT BLOCK -7, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, IN
FAVOUR OF P-1 AND SITE NO. 829, SITUATED AT BLOCK -11,
ARKAVATHI LAYOUT IN FAVOUR P -2 AND FURTHER DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO PUT THE PETITIONERS IN POSSESSION OF
THEIR RESPECTIVE SITES AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.30781/2015:
BETWEEN:
1 . SRI BACHAPPA
S/O LATE MARIYAPPA,
R/AT NO.172,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560077
SINCE DECEASED BY LR'S

1(a). SMT. MARIYAMMA
221
W/O. LATE BACHAPPA

AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
1(b). SRI. B. KRISHNAPPA

S/O. LATE BACHAPPA
AGED 52 YEARS
1(c). SRI. B. CHANDRAPPA

S/O. LATE BACHAPPA
AGED 52 YEARS
1(d). SRI. B. NARAYANSWAMY

S/O. LATE BACHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
1(e). SRI. B. MANJUNATH

S/O.LATE BACHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
1(f). SRI. B. RAMANJI

S/O. LATE BACHAPPA
AGED 43 YEARS
SL.NO. 1(a) to 1(f) ARE
R/AT NO. 172, NEAR
B.B.M.P OFFICE
TANISANDRA
S.R.K. NAGAR POST
BANGALORE- 77
1(g). SMT. GAYATRIYAMMA @ GAYATRI

D/O. LATE BACHAPPA
W/O. G.A. GANGADHAR GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT. GANTAGARA
CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA
1(h). KUMARI CHANDRAKALA

D/O. LATE BACHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
R/AT. NO. 172, NEAR
B.B.M.P. OFFICE
TANISANDRA,
S.R.K. NAGAR POST
BANGALORE - 77
...PETITIONERS
222
(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF SECOND FINAL
DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE
ANNEX - L TO THE W.P. AND TO DECLARE THE SCHEME
FORMULATED BY THE BDA UNDER THE NAME CALLED
"ARKAVATHI LAYOUT" AS LAPSED IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S
LAND IS CONCERNED AND QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED
11.03.2015 ONE ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEX - J TO THE
W.P.
IN W.P. NO.31794/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. M. MAHENDRA
S/O MARAPPA,
223
2. SRI M RAJAKUMAR
S/O MARAPPA,
3. SMT AMMAYAMMA
W/O RAMAIAH,
4. SRI NARAYANAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIBELLAPPA,
5. SRI MARAPPA
S/O LATE POOJARI CHIKKANNA,
6. SMT GOWRAMMA
W/O LATE SONNAPPA
7. SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O A. M. MUNEGOWDA,
8. SRI AMBARISH
S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA,
9. SRI RAVIKUMAR
S/O MARAPPA,
10 . SRI KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIBELLAPPA
11 . SRI MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE PILLAPPA,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DASARAHALLI,

K.R.PURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 024
...PETITIONERS
224
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN
- E IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER AND THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 32423/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MOHAMMED HEMANI

S/O LATE MOHAMMED ALI HEMANI ,
2. SRI. PYAR ALI HEMANI

S/O LATE MOHAMMED ALI HEMANI,

CHIKKA BAZAR CROSS,
225
TASKAR TOWN, SHIVAJINAGAR,

BANGALORE - 560051
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE )
AND:
SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560001

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020
...RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R -1 VIDE ANNX - G
IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT LAND IN SY.NO.46/4 MEASURING
1.00 ACRE OF LAND OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM
HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ., BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33127/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT SUSHEELAMMA
W/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH,
RESIDING AT
SRI. VINAYAKA NILAYA
226
LAKSHMINARAYANASWAMY
TEMPLE STREET,
AMRUTHAHALLI,
SAHAKARANAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560092
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEX - G IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND
ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33128/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. TOTADA MUNIYAPPA

S/O LATE VENKATAPPA,
R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
SAHAKARANAGAR POST,
227
BANGALORE 560092
(SR.CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE - 560020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

BANGALORE -560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSERL FOR
SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3)

ANNEXURE - F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33131/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA,
2. SRI. KALLAPPA
S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 064
228
...PETITIONERS
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE 560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE - 560020
...RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE
DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - H AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33133/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI B. K. SHANKAR
S/O SRI B. KENCHAPPA,
RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560064
...PETITIONER
AND:
229

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

- F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33134/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT SAROJAMMA
W/O KONEERAPPA,
2. SRI K. MANJUNATH
S/O KONEERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560 064
...PETITIONERS
AND:

230

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE
DATED 28.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - G AND
ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33137/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. A. SATHYANARAYANASWAMY
SON OF LATE CHIKKAPPAIAH,
RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
K.R PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560077
(SR. CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER
AND:
231
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX -
F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 35055/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. NAGARATHNA
W/O LATE SHEKAR,
RESIDING AT NO.104,
3RD CROSS,
VINAYAKA NAGAR,
KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN,
BANGALORE-560 080
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE )
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020

232

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF
SITE NO.830 SITUATED AT BLOCK -11, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, IN
FAVOUR OF PETITIONER AND FURTHER DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO PUT THE PETITIONER IN POSSESSION ON
HER SITE AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 35464/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI NARAYANASWAMY
S/O LATE N.K.APPAYANNA,
REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER
SRI.N.J.MURTHY,
S/O SRI. M. A. JAYARAMAIAH, 47 YEARS
NO.B302, KRISHNA DIAMOND APARTMENTS,
A-BLOCK, SAHAKARANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560092.
...PETITIONER
AND:

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.

233

BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEXURE - E ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 35465/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. DESIKACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYACHAR
R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI,
2. SRI. PADMANABHACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYACHAR
R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI
BOTH REPRESENTED BY
M/S POOJA BUILDERS
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY
ITS MANAGING PARTNER
MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA
...PETITIONERS
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-01.

234
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.

BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3))

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER IS
CONCERNED VIDE ANN - F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 35842/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI L RAJANNA
S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT RACHENAHALLI
SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST
BANGALORE - 560 080
SENIOR CITZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE)

AND:
SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560 001

SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE - 560020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER
235

SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONERS
DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN - M AND
ETC.
IN W.P NO. 37412/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. MARIAMMA KOSHY

W/O LATE M KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY,
NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT,
ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA,
BANGALORE-560 077
2. SHRI BINOJ KOSHY

S/O M. KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY,
BANGALORE-560 077
SERVING AS LT. COL. IN THE INDIAN
ARMY CAMP, GANDHIANGAR,
GUJARAT-382 042
3. SHRI BIJU KOSHY

S/O LATE M. KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY,
BANGALORE-560 077
236
4. MRS. BIJI RONALD GEORGE

D/O LATE M KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY,
BANGALORE-560 077
PETITIONER NOS. 2 TO 4 ARE REPRESENTED

BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SMT. MARIAMMA KOSHY
(FIRST PETITIONER)
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. V. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE
AND SRI. P.S. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE -560 020

T. CHOWDAIAH RAOD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VIKRAM HUILGAL , ADVOCATE AND
SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.07.2015 AT ANNEXURE - S ISSUED BY
THE R -3 AND ETC.
237
IN W.P NO. 40838/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI S. SHESHACHAR
SON OF LATE SRINIVASACHAR,
RESIDING AT #57, RACHENAHALLI,
SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560077.
SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED.
...PETITIONER
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.

BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

E AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 44088/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
MR. SADATHULLA KHAN

238
S/O LATE B. PEER KHAN

NO.59/3, 6TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS,
PILLAPPA BLOCK,
GANGANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 032.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. VICTOR MANOHARAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (UDD)
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.

K.P. WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO
GRANT AN ALTERNATIVE SITE TOWARDS ACQUISITION FOR
FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OF HIS SITE NO.7 FALLING
IN SY NO.97/1 SITUATED AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA
HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, FORTHWITH AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 45662/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
K. V. BACHIREDDY
S/O LATE V. VENKATAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
239
NO.52/1, 7TH MAIN ROAD,

THIMMAREDDY ROAD,
APPAREDDYPALYA
INDIRANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 038
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (NORTH DIVISION)

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE)

ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R - 1 DATED 04.04.2014 AT
ANNEX - G TO THE W.P. AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47015/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT RADHA RUKMINI

W/O LATE G. CHINNAPPA,
R/AT K-7, (48/1),
RUKMINI BUILDING,
3RD MAIN, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURAM,
SRIRAMPURAM,
BANGALORE-560 021
SR CITIZEN NOT CLAIM
2. SRI. VENKATAPPA
240

S/O DODDAVEEERANAGAPPA,
RESIDING AT KACHALLI,
TUBUGERE HOBLI,
DODDABALLAPUR TALUK,
SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIM
3. SRI. M. RUDRAPPA
S/O M. N. MANCHAPPA,
R/AT NO.423, 4TH MAIN,
GANIGARA PETE,
DODDABALLAPUR,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,
SR CITIZEN NOT CLAIM
PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED

BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY
SMT. RADHA RUKMINI
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
241

SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSIDER THE REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION OF THE R -1
DATED 31.07.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47820/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. SRINIVAS
S/O SRI. M. RAMARAJU,
R/AT NO. 6/1, I FLOOR,
KHM BLOCK, GANGANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 032
REPRESENTED BY HIS
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SRI.TEJRAJ GULECHA
S/O LATE PUKHRAJ GULECHA
NO. 9/1, CLASSIC COURT,
RICHMOND ROAD,
SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING


242

KUMARA PARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR

ISSUING R-1 ANNEXURE -F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47821/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI JAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE GOPALAPPA,
2. SRI SHANKAR
S/O LATE GOPALAPPA
3. SRI. VENKATESH
S/O LATE GOPALAPPA,
4. SRI. NAGESH
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
5. SMT. SHOBA
D/O LATE RAMAIAH
6. SRI. RAGHU
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
7. SRI. MANJUNATH
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
243
8. SRI. SUJENDRA
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT

TANISANDRA VILLAGE,
K.R.PURA HOBLI,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR
POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR. RAMESHKUMAR GULECHA
S/O PUKHRAJ GULECHA,
MAJOR, NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR,
CLASSIC COURT,
RICHMOND ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
244

ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47822/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
W/O A.M. SURYANARAYANAGOWDA
R/AT NO.308, 4TH B CROSS,
HRBR LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK,
KALYANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 043
REPRESENTED BY HER
POWER OF ATTORNEY
M/S MANYATA INFRASTRUCTURE
DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD.,
NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR, CLASSIC COURT,
RICHMOND ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 025
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
MR. TEJRAJ GULECHA
...PETITIONER

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT Y

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020.
245

KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47823/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. SUBHA PRASAD

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
W/O RAVIKUMAR
R/AT NO.16, VANIVILAS ROAD
BASAVANAGUDI
BANGALORE-560 004
REPRESENTED BY HER
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA
S/O. MR PUKHRAJ GULECHA
MAJOR, NO.9/1, I FLOOR
CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD
BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONER

AND:

246
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.47824/2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. LAKSHMI SRINIVAS

D/O B.A. SRINIVAS GUPTA,
R/AT NO. 16, VANIVILAS ROAD,
BASAVANAGUDI,
BANGALORE - 560 004
REPRESENTED BY HER
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA
S/O MR. PUKHRAJ GULECHA,
MAJOR, NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR,
CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 025
...PETITIONER
247
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITHY

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020
3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.47825/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI R. ADINARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH
(SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
2. SRI. R. NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH
3. SRI. R. BASAVARAJU
248
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH
4. SRI. R. NARAYANASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH
ALL RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE,

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - C AND ETC.
249
IN W.P. NO.47826/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT V. JAYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
D/O VENKATAPPA
SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED
2. SRI. PADMANABHACHARYA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANATHARAYA @
GUNDAPPA
3. SRI. DESIKACHAR
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANATHARAYA
ALL RESIDING AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE,

KASABA HOBLI,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR
POWR OF ATTORNEY
M/S POOJA BUILDERS,
NO.86, 2ND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN,
GANDHINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 009
BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,
SRI. TEJARAJ GULECHA
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
BANGALORE-560 001

250
AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER,

KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE RAOD,
BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - F AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.47827/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI C. DASAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
R/AT RACHENAHALLI,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL
FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
251

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P. NO.49842/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. ANJANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
R/AT TANISANDRA,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
S. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
252
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020.

THE BANGALOARE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.49843/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI BYREGOWDA
S/O LATE APPAYANNA
R/AT TANISANDRA,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
253
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.

BY ITS COMMISIONER,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.56271/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. N. RAJU
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O P. NARAYANASWAMY
R/AT NO.95, HORAMAVU AGARA,
HORAMAVU POST,
BANGALORE-560 043.
2. SMT. TEJASWINI
W/O SRI. N. RAJU
R/AT NO.95, HORAMAVU AGARA
HORAMAVU POST,
BANGALORE-560 043.
...PETITIONERS
254
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.57432/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. GOVINDASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O MUNISWAMAPPA
2. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA
W/O B.H.C. MUNEGOWDA
K.NARAYANAPURA
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
...PETITIONERS
255
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560028

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560028
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P. NO.57434/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. S. RAMACHANDRA
S/O H. SUBBANNA (LATE)
RESIDING AT
K. NARAYANAPURA
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
256
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.57438/2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. JAYAMMA
W/O KRISHNAPPA
RESIDING AT
THANISANDRA
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
257
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P. NO.57439/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA
S/O LATE SONAPPA
R/AT THANISANDRA
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER
AND:
258

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P. NO.57992/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHINNAPPA
S/O. ENESHAPPA,
R/AT MESTRIPALYA,
KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
AND:
BANGALORE-560 001.
259
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-
F AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.59004/2015:
BETWEEN:
MUNIRAMAIAH
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR
SRI. SUBRAMANI,
S/O. LATE MUNIRAMAIAH,
R/AT: SRIRAMPURA,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE,
SRI. ARVIND C. DESAI, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
REP BY ITS
260
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1)
OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEXURE - C ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED UNDER
SECTION 19(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEXURE - D ISSUED BY
THE R-1 AND RE- MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY THE
R -1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY CONCERNED AS
LAPSED IN TERMS OF SECTION 24 OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR
COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION
REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.59486/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT R. SHOBHA
W/O. VENKATARAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
2. SMT. R. NIRMALA
261
W/O. SRI JAYARAJU N.

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
3. SMT R. PREMAKUMARI
W/O. SRI P. ASHWATHANARAYANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
4. SMT. R. SHEELA RANI

W/O SRI. L. NARENDRA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
5. SMT. R. SUDHA
W/O SRI JAYARAJU
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
6. SMT R. ROOPA
W/O SRI RAVI
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT:
NO. 390, J. R. LAYOUT
1ST MAIN ROAD
CHELIKERE
KALYANANAGAR
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE
AND SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE - 01
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARAPARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020

KUMARAPARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
262

SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL AND

NOTIFICATION U/S. 17[1] & [3] DATED 03.02.2003, PUBLISHED IN
THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS
LAND BEARING SY.NO.5 MEASURING 21 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT
VIDE ANNEX - E ISSUED BY R-1 AND QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION U/S 19[1] DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE
GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS
LAND BEARING SY.NO.5 MEASURING 21 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT
VIDE ANNEX - G ISSUED BY R -1.
IN W.P. NO.59492/2015:
BETWEEN:
HANUMA REDDY
S/O LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT CHELLAKERE
PALLOTI NILAYA
KALYAN NAGAR POST
BANGALORE - 560043
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND
SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE - 01
REPTD. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
263

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3))

NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) DATED 03.02.2003
PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF
THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING NO. 4/1 MEASURING 14
GUNTAS PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE - D. (II) QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION U/S 19(1) DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE
GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS
LAND BEARING NO. 4/1 MEASURING 14 GUNTAS PRODUCED
VIDE ANNEXURE - F.
IN W.P. NO.59495/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SAROJAMMA
W/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY,
2. SRI S. PRAKASH
S/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
3. SRI S. ANIL REDDY

S/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
4. SMT. S.AMARAVATHI
264
W/O A. SURESH KUMAR,

D/O LATE P.SHANKAR REDDY,
ALL ARE R/AT:

CHELLAKERE VILLAGE
KALYANANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE -1.
REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARAPARK WEST,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS
NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) OF BDA ACT DATED
03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN
RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY.NO.4/2
MEASURING 23 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - G
ISSUED BY R-1. (II) QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION U/S 19(1)
OF BDA ACT DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON
18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING
SY.NO.4/2 MEASURING 23 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT VIDE
ANNEXURE - J ISSUED BY R-1.
IN W.P. NO.742/2016:
BETWEEN:
265
SMT. K. N. SHOBHA
W/O. KRISHNA
R/AT NO.93/A, THEJAS NILAYA,
5TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE,
MANJUNATHA NAGAR,
RAJAJINAGAR,A
BANGALORE-560 010.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SITE
CANCELLATION ORDER DATED 02.07.2008 [ANNEX - E] IN
RESPECT OF SITE NO. 780, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BLOCK - X,
BANGALORE AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS
THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.751/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI B. H. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

S/O LATE B. HANUMANTHE GOWDA,
RESIDING AT NO.119,
UTI BANK RAC, 80 FEET ROAD,
7TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU-560095
...PETITIONER
266
(BY SRI. MURALIDHAR H. M., ADVOCATE)

AND:

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020
M.S. BUILDING
VIKAS SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT TO ALLOT,
REGISTER AND PUT THE PETITIONER IN PHYSICAL POSSESSION
OF A SITE MEASURING 30 X 40 FEET IN BLOCK - V, ARKAVATHI
LAYOUT, BANGALORE IN LIEU OF SITE NO. 184/E WHICH WAS
ALLOTTED AND REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER
AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.2392/2016:
BETWEEN:
MR. JOKIM
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
S/O SRI. ANNAYAPPA
R/AT NO.198, CHURCH BLOCK,
VISHWANATHANAGENAHALLI
R.T. NAGAR POST,
(BY SRI. ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFFI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
267
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING
B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
- F AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2397/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. A. RUDRAPPA
S/O ANJINAPPA,
AGD ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.73,
1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
HEBBAL FARM POST,
BANGALORE-560024
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPARTRMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
REP BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
M. S. BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001
268

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 17(1)
OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNX-B & FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-2 U/S 19(1) OF BDA ACT VIDE
ANNX -C AND RE- MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT, VIDE ANNX-M
IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY BEARING
SY.NO.28/1 MEASURING 20 GUNTAS OF KEMPAPURA VILLAGE IS
CONCERNED AS LAPSED COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY
IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT
ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2915/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. H. GANGANNA
S/O LATE HANUMANTHA
AGED AOBUT 62 YEARS
R/O NO.110,
2ND MAIN,
KAREKALLU,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BASAVESWARANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 079
269
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V. LAKSHMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
BY ITS COMMISISONER
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.C OUNSEL FOR
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO CONSIDER
THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE REPRESENTATIONS
VIDE ANNEX - J TO J5 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.5417/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. C. SRIRAMA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
2. SRI. C. SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
3. SRI. C. PAPANNA
S/O. LATE CHANNARAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE

RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE.
4. BHARAT SEVASHRAM SANGHA

A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE
SOCIETIES
REGISTRATION ACT XXI OF 1860
NO.211,RASH BEHARI AVENUE,
270
KOLKATTA-70019(W.B)
BRANCH AT NO.118/2,
AMRUTHAHALLI,
JAKKUR MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU
REPRESENTED BY SWAMI SIVAPREMANANDA

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
OF BHARAT SEVASHRAM SANGHA
NO.118/2,AMRUTHAHALLI,
JAKKUR MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H. R. ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE )
AND:

BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDA, BANGALORE-560 001

NO.7,T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020

NO.7,T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020
4. THE METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE

HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
ROOM NO.1,GROUND FLOOR,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001

PLANNING AUTHORITY,
BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
BBMP COMPLEX,
271
J.C. ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 002
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -
K1 AND QUASH THE BULK ALLOTMENT ORDER DATED
21.10.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2 WHICH IS ANNEXED AS
ANNEXURE - H1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.5446/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. P. DHANALAKSHMAMMA
W/O LATE SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR,
(BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
R/O SRI.LAKSHMINARAYANA,
NO.1292, 8TH MAIN ROAD, WEST OF CORD ROAD,
2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BANGALORE-560086.
SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
SMT. T.H. VANISHREE

W/O. T.S. HARINATH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/A NO: 563, IST MAIN ROAD
NAGENDRA BLOCK,
BANASHANKARI IST STAGE
BENGALURU.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJAGOPAL M. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE-560020.
272
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-II

BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

RESOLUTION DATED 23.09.2015 PASSED IN SUBJECT NO.
115/2015 BY THE RESPONDENT BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY AT ANNX - G AND THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT
DATED 28.10.2015 ISSUED BY R-1 AT ANNEX - H AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.5448/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. GOWRAMMA
W/O LATE K ADINARAYANA GOWDA
58 YEARS, R/A HOUSE NO.1, SY.NO.20/1
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANAKA ROAD
BANGALORE NORTH(ADDL), TALUK
BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. RAJANNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI
BENGALURU-560001

3. THE ADDL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
273
SL.NOS 2 TO 3 ARE AT
OFFICE OF THE BDA
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARAPARK WEST
BENGALURU -560020
…RESPONDENTS

SMT. PAVITHRA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -A ACQUIRING LAND
OF THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO.709 BEARING SY.NO.20/1 OF
JAKKUR MEASURING 0.22 GUNTAS AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.6717/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI D. V. CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O D. V. VEERANNA
K. R. PURAM HOBLI,
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001

274
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
4. V. SHIVAREDDY
S/O. K.S. VENKATAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO. 51/5, 6TH MAIN

13TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM
BANGALORE - 560 003
5. S.S. SRINIVAS RAO

S/O. PROF S.L. SEETHARAMA RAO
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT FLATNO. 301
'PALASHA RESIDENCE'
#26, IX CROSS, IV MAIN
MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE - 560003
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL AND
SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. ASHOK HARNAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. MANJUNATH K.V., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THAT THE FINAL
ANNEXURE - C IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.6718/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SATISH
275
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

S/O D. V. NARAYANASWAMY
R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE
K. R. PURAM HOBLI - 560038
...PETITIONER
AND:

B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560001
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
4. V. SHIVAREDDY
S/O. K.S. VENKATAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO. 51/5, 6TH MAIN
13TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM
BANGALORE - 560 003
5. S.S. SRINIVAS RAO

S/O. PROF S.L. SEETHARAMA RAO
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT FLATNO. 301
'PALASHA RESIDENCE'
#26, IX CROSS, IV MAIN
MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE - 560003
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
276
SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL FOR

SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)

ANNEXURE - C ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE
IN W.P.NO.10318/2016:
BETWEEN:
MR.SWAMY GOWDA
S/O LATE CHELUVE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
634/19, 6TH MAIN ROAD
SHIVAJI MAHARAJA ROAD
BHAVANI NAGAR, K G NAGAR
BANGALORE-560019
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JEEVAN K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER
T CHAOWDAYYA ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. A. D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE )

RESPONDENT TO COMPLETE THE CONVEYANCE IN PURSUANCE
OF THE ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 24.06.2006 AT ANNEX - B IN
RESPECT OF SITE NO. 834 ALLOTED TO THE PETITIONER AT
BLOCK V OF ARKAVATHY LAYOUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW
AND ETC.
277
IN W.P.NO.11295/2016:
BETWEEN:
C. R. SHIVASHANKAR
S/O SRI. RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
1ST CROSS, IDEAL HOMES LAYOUT,
RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 098
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. LEELA KRISHNAN D., ADVOCATE)
AND:

BDA COMPLEX, KUMARA PARK WEST
EXTENSION, BANGALORE-20
REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. PAVITHRA A RAO, ADVOCATE)

RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO REGISTER SCHEDULE SITE
BEARING NO. 1494, 7TH BLOCK, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, ALLOTTED
TO HIM UNDER ANNEXURE - A OR TO ALLOT HIM A SUITABLE
ALTERNATE SITE MEASURING 15 MTRS X 24 MTRS INANY OF ITS
LAYOUTS AND REGISTER THE SAME EXPEDIOUSLY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.11493/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. ANTHONYSWAMY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O LATE AROGYAPPA
SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED
2. A. JOSEPH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O LATE AROGYAPPA
SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED
BOTH RESIDING AT NO.158,

278
M. M. REDDY ROAD
MARIYANNAPALYA
H. A. FARM POST
BANGALORE-560 024
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMETN
B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 & 2 TO
FORTHWITH CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION OF R - 3
DATED 27.03.2013 AT ANNEX - B AND EXCLUDE THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.11844/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. SAROJAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
WIFE OF LATE SHAMANNA
RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE
279
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560004
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
MULTRISTORIED BUILDING
B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - C IN SO FAR AS
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.11846/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI BACHANNA
SON OF LATE MARINANJAPPA
RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
280
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560064

...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020

KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 )

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - C IN SO FAR AS
IN W.P.NO.12010/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI C. CHIKKANNAPPA
S/O CHIKKAHANUMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
DODDATUMAKUR VILLAGE & POPST,
DODDABALLAPUR TALUK,
...PETITIONER
281
(BY SRI. T.N. VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARAPARK PART WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE )

RESPONDENT TO REFUND EXCESS AMOUNT COLLECTED FROM
THE PETITIONER WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 18% FROM
THE DATE OF DEPOSIT TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.12674/2016:
BETWEEN:
MRS. JHANSI RANI AKKIRAJU

W/O SIV PRASAD AKKI RAJU
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RESIDING AT FLAT NO.201,
HOUSE NO.274,
8TH MAIN ROAD,
BEML LAYOUT, THUBARAHALLI
BANGALORE-68
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. REUBEN JACOB, ADVOCATE)
AND:
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001
282

KUMARA PARK WEST,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-20
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. SACHIN B. S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2, FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 18.06.2014 BOTH ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNX - C, D
& G TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR AS THE LAND IN SY.NO.38/1 OF
SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU
NORTH ADDL. TQ., BENGALURU DISTRICT MEASURING 1 ACRE
35 GUNTAS IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.13637/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. R. SHAKUNTHALA
W/O T.R.NAGARAJ
NO.4, 7TH A MAIN ROAD,
MUTHYALANAGARA,
BANGALORE-560 074
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. T. N. VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

KUMAR PARK (WEST)
BANGALORE-560020
283
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. C. R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE )

RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER
FOR ALLOTMENT OF SITE IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.14280/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI R. DAYANAND REDDY

S/O. LATE. V. RAMASWAMY REDDY,
R/AT NO. 17,
8TH CROSS, HENNUR MAIN ROAD,
K. K. HALLI,
BANGALORE - 560 084
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANGAMESH R. B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.S. BUILDING, BANGLAORE- 01,
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 20.

AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3 )

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE
PROPERTY IS CONCERNED WHICH IS BELONGING TO THE
PETITIONER ( ANNEXURE -G) AND ETC.
284
IN W.P.NO.14649/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. GOWRAMMA
W/O. LATE. JAYARAM REDDY,
R/O CHELLAKARE VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE )
AND:

M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE 01.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE
ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND
BEARING SY. NO. 12/2 MEASURING 16 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT
VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND ETC.
285
IN W.P.NO.14650/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMAIAH
S/O. LATE. CHIKKA THAYAPPA,
R/O CHELLAKARE VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 01.
REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE
ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND
BEARING SY. NO. 12/2 MEASURING 29 GUNTAS EXCLUDING 5
GUNTAS OF KHARAB PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND
ETC.
286
IN W.P.NO.15833/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI KADAMPULLY SUKUMARAN KARTHIK

AGE:50 YEARS
SON OF SRI. KADAMPULLY APPU SUKUMARAN
RESIDINT AT VILLA 36, LIFESTYLE, IVC ROAD,
DEVANAHALLI - 562 110
BANGALORE
EARLIER RESIDENT OF WII/247,

THEVAR MADAM ROAD,
CHOWANNUR, KUNNAMKULAM
THRISSUR - 680 503
KERALA
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH S. ARBATTI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA

VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
…RESPONDENTS
SRI.D .N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - G
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.
287
IN W.P.NO.19019/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI BHARATH KUMAR N

S/O SRI NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M S BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE--560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DTD 3.2.2013 PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEXURE-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.,
288
IN W.P.NO.19020/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. BHARATH KUMAR N

S/O SRI. NARAYANAPPA,
AGE 26 YEARS,
R/AT NO.78, K.NARAYANAPURA,
ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD,
SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REP BY ITS SECRETARY,
M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.

REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD 3.2.2003 PASSED BY THE R-2
VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.,
289
IN W.P.NO.23623/2016:
BETWEEN
1. R. M. ANBUMANI
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O K. R. MASILAMANI,
NO.19, III CROSS,
III STAGE, III PHASE,
VTH BLOCK,
BANASHANAKARI,
2. M. G. SUBRAMANIAM,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O M.R. GOPALAKRISHNAN,
SAM TOWERS,C-2, II FLOOR,
NO.22, RAJU STREET,
CHENNAI - 600023.
3. A. RAMALINGAM,
S/O R. ANNAMALAI,
R/AT S-4, KALAPATHARU APARTMENT,
51, VELLALAR STREET,
ADAMBAKKAM,
CHENNAI-600 088.
4. HERAMBA KARTHIK. B,
S/O LATE R. BALASUBRAMANIAN
R/AT FLAT NO.102, SCION ARCH APARTMENTS,
BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, MAIN ROAD,
C. V. RAMAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 093.
5. S. JAYARAMAN,
S/O SRI. G. SRINIVASAN,
R/AT C/O JAGADISH,
NO.4/1, OLD NO.34, II FLOOR,
VI CROSS,
SMB COLONY, MATHIKERE,
BRINDAVANNAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 054
290
6. V. K. VERMA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O P. P. SHRIVSTAVA,
NO.20, MANU MANDIR,
WORLI HILL ESTATE, WORLI,
MUMBAI-400 018.
7. K. R. SRINIVASAN
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O. K.R.R. AIYANGAR,
NO.22, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD PHASE,
J P NAGAR,
8. S. ILANGO
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O T. M. SHANMUGAM,
R/AT NO. 2472, 15TH CROSS,
27TH MAIN, HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-1,
BANGALORE-560 102.
9. MEENAKSHI JAGADEESA. N,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
W/O LATE JAGADEESAN,
R/AT NO.716, 7TH A MAIN,
H.R.B.R.1ST BLOCK,
10. SARASWATHI VAITHIANATHAN

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
W/O R. VAITHIANATHAN,
A-204,SEA FLAMA,
DOSTI FLAMINGO,
2ND FLOOR, T. J. ROAD, SEWREE,
MUMBAI - 400 015.
11. K. V. S. NARAYAN,
S/O LATE K. S. VISHWANATH
NO.301, PALACE VIEW APARTMENTS
14, JAYAMAHAL MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 046
12. H. ROHINESH
291
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

S/O K. SUBBAIAH
34, AMIT TATA SOCIETY,
MURARI GHAG MARG,
PRABHADEVI,
MUMBAI - 400 025
13. M.H.P. ACHAR,

S/O M. S. HANUMANTH ACHAR,
R/AT NO.320, 5TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS,
N.R.COLONY,
BANGALORE-560 019
14. B. KANNAN
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O SRI. M. BALGURUMURTHY,
R/AT C/O KAMAL KISHORE,
NO.704, 8TH CROSS,
INDIRANAGAR, II STAGE,
15. K. V. VENKATESHA
S/O K. VASUDEVA RAO,
R/AT NO.G-1, LAKSHMANA
KRUPA APARTMENTS,
NO.23, EAST ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET,
BASAVANAGUDI,
16. G. DAMODARAN,
S/O A. P. GOVINDARAJ
R/AT NO.24, SHAMANNA LANE,
CHURCH ROAD, MURUGESH PALYA,
17. NITIN SETH,

S/O LATE S. L. SETH,
R/AT NO.146, JALVAU VIHAR,
KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
H.R.B.R. LAYOUT,
292
18. V. SUNDRESH,
S/O LATE A.P.V.RAO,
NO.1555/C,16TH A MAIN,
J.P. NAGAR, 2ND PHASE,
19. ASURI SRINIVASAN RANGAN,

M. R. GARDENS, V NAGENAHALLI,
R. T. NAGAR POST,
20. S. RENGARAJAN,
S/O G. SRINIVASAN,
R/AT C/O PRAKASH RENGARAJAN,
NO.1091, SOBHA PRIMROSE,
SARAJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD,
BELLANDUR,
BANGALORE-560 103.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. N. DINESH RAO, ADVOCATE )
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE )

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE
PETITIONER IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT
CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT
TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS
WITHIN REASONBALE TIME AND ETC.,
293
IN W.P.NO.23643/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. V. F. BANAJI
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O FARROKI DADI BANAJI
C/O R M ANBUMANI
R/AT INLAND EVER GLADES,
APARTMENTS, NO 121,
1ST FLOOR, 'B' BLOCK,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA DASARHALLI MAIN ROAD
HA FARM POST DASARHALLI POST
2. A VIDYA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
W/O C S BALAKRISHNAN
FLAT NO 4, SATHYAM APARTMENTS
18, II MAIN R A PURAM
CHENNAI - 600 028
3. T A REVATHI
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
W/O SRI T K ANANTHA SAYANAM
R/AT FLAT NO 405-E S S ENVIRONS
CHELEKERE, K R PURAM HOBLI
KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560 043
4. MANI RAMAN
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE KRISHNASWAMY RAMAN,
2ND CROSS, II STAGE
INDIRANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 008
5. P SHASHIKANTH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O SRI P GOVIND RAO
R/AT NO 20, KRISHNA KUNJ
JALADARSHINI LAYOUT
MATHIKERE POST,
294
6. VENKAT SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O A P V RAO
NO 2, 8TH CROSS (266/11)
3RD MAIN,
HANUMANTHA NAGAR
MUMBAI - 560 019.
7. Y CHANDRASEKHAR
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O T V Y RAMAN,
C/O V SUNDARESH,
NO 1555/C 16TH 'A' MAIN
J P NAGAR 2ND PHASE,
8. BANSILAL DHAR
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O DR PREMNATH DHAR
R/AT HOUSE NO 1746, SECTOR 28,
FARIDABAD - 121 008. (HARYANA)
9. ANU SETH
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
W/O NITHIN SETH
R/AT FLAT NO 315,
RMV CLUSTERS PHASE I
RMV EXTN II STAGE
10. V R HERKAL
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O R B HERKAL
R/O FLAT NO C-403
AVON MAJESTY, DATTAPADA ROAD
BORIVALI (EAST)
MUMBAI - 400 066.
11. M S JAVEED HAFEEZ

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O DR M A HAFEES
R/AT PALM SPRINGS,
NO 6, G 01, 16TH MAIN,
295
7TH CROSS, 4TH B BLOCK

KORAMANGALA
12. GAYATHRI RANGARAJAN

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
W/O RANGARAJAN
R/AT FLAT NO 302 III FLOOR
SWATHI APARTMENTS,
V MAIN DEFENCE COLONY
INDIRA NAGAR,
13 . S SHANKAR PRASED
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O S M SEETHARAMAIAH,
R/AT NO 79 SHANKAR MUTT COMPOUND
CHIKKANNA GARDEN 2ND CROSS,
SHANKARAPURAM
...PETITIONERS
SRI. DINESH RAO N, ADVOCATE )
AND:

RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE )

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE
PETITIONER IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT
CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT
TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS
WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC.,
296
IN W.P.NO.23656/2016:
BETWEEN:
A N PRAKASH RAO
S/O A NARAYAN RAO
R/AT NO.598, 11TH CROSS, J P NAGAR
PHASE-III,
(BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR

SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHRORITY

KUMARA PARK WEST,
2. SPECIAL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

KUMARA PARK WEST
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT DTD. 2.12.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-L. DIRECT
THE RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO.70-C, KHATHA
NO.142/70-C, CARVED OUT OF SY.NO.81/2B OF THANISANDRA
VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN
FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND
ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.24322/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. MR D O BERGER
S/O A. E. BERGER,
297
(SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED)

R/AT NO.4/668,
P & T COLONY, RAMACHANDRANAGAR,
GUNTAKAL, ANDHRA PRADESH
PIN:515 801,
NOW CAMP AT BANGALORE.
2. MRS. BEVERLY MARY BERGER

W/O H.D.BERGER,
R/AT NO.611B,
RAILWAY QUARTERS,
ARAVINDNAGAR,
GUNTAKAL, A.P.
PIN:515 801.
NOW CAMP AT BANGALORE.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SREENIVASAMURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE SECRETARY
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING,
VIDHANA VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
298
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-H

DTD.18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
NOTIFICATION AT ANNEXURE-H AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.24676/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. GOWRAMMA
W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY.R
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
RESIDING AT
CHELLAKARE VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560043.
2. SMT. YASHODAMMA
W/O LATE NAGENDRA. R
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
RESIDING AT
CHELLAKARE VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
KALYAN NAGAR POST,
3. SMT. SUGUNA
W/O LATE MUNIRAJU.R
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
RESIDING AT
CHELLAKARE VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 043.
4. SHANKAR REDDY
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RESIDING AT
CHELLAKARE VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560043.
299
5. RAJA REDDY
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
RESIDING AT
CHELLAKARE VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
KALYAN NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560043.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. K BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-1.
REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS


OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 BDA
AND ITS OFFICIALS FROM IN ANY WAY INTERFERING OR FROM
DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONERS FROM THE SCHEDULE
PROPERY SINCE THE SAME HAS NOT BEEN ACQUIRED FOR ITS
ANY SCHEMES INCLUDING THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI
LAYOUT AND ETC.,
300
IN W.P.NO.24919/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. T.C. HEMANNA

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
K R PURAM HOBLI,
ARABIC POST,
BANGALORE-560 045
2. SRI H BYREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
S/O T C HEMANNA
K R PURAM HOBLI,
ARABIC POST,
BANGALORE-560 045.
3. SRI T C CHINNASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O LATE CHIKKANNA,
K R PURAM HOBLI,
ARABIC POST,
BANGALORE-560 045
4. SRI C GIRISH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
S/O T C CHINNSWAMY
K R PURAM HOBLI,
ARABIC POST,
BANGALORE-560 045.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE - 560 001
301
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
K P WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
K P WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
4. SMT NARAYANAMMA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
W/O LATE D KRISHNA,
R/AT NO.1/1,
ALUR CROSS,
MAKALI VILLAGE,
DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-562 123.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. NARAYANAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE
KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S
19(1) OF THE BDA ACT I.E. ANNEXURE-G IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS IN SY.NO.80/1
OF THE THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TQ., MEASURING 1 ACRE 17 GUNTAS.
IN W.P.NO.25131/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SHRI G K RAMEGOWDA
S/O SHRI. KRISHNE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT NO.95, 1ST CROSS,
1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU-43.
...PETITIONER
302
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-01
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.

OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPEMENT
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE- 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITON FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
NOTIFICATION DTD 18.06.2014, AS PER ANNEXURE-H, IN
RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.25132/2016:
BETWEEN:
SHRI G K RAMEGOWDA
S/O SHRI KRISHNE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT

303
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020.

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-H IN RESPECT
OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.30680/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. HUCHAPPA B
SON OF LATE BILLIYAPPA
RESIDING AT NO.40/2/14
OPP CHBS LAYOUT,
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 040
...PETITIONER

304
AND:

B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001.

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.33181/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI J MUNNAGAPPA
S/O LATE B JAYARAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
NO 96 B NAGASANDRA
YAMALUR POST
BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GIRISHA N. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY
305
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN
DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-1
KARNATAKA.

KUMARA PARK WEST

BANGALORE- 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATIONS, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD:3.2.2003 AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD:23.2.2004 WITH REGARD TO
ACQUISITION OF PETITIONERS LANDS BEARING SY NO.16/10A
THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK AND DROP THE SAME FROM THE ACQUISTION UNDER
THE SAID NOTIFICATIONS, CONSEQUENTLY RESTRAIN THE
RESPONDENTS FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PETITIONERS
SITES THEREIN WITHOUT TAKING DUE RECOURSE OF LAW AND
ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.33196/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. LOKANANDA NAIDU

S/O LATE B RADHAKRISHNA,
R/AT NO. 1197/C, 22ND A CROSS,
23RD MAIN, BSK 2ND STAGE,
2. SRI. B R CHANDRASHEKAR
S/O. LATE B RADHAKRISHNA,
306
HIG COLONY, RMV 2ND STAGE,

3. SMT. P ANITHA
D/O ANJANEY NAIDU,
R/AT NO. 11-67-1, N.G.O.
COLONY, PUTTUR - 577 583
CHITTUR DISTRICT,
ANDRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ANGADI S. V., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIKAS SOUDHA,
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BDA, KUMARA PARK,
3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BDA,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020. …RESPONDENTS

SRI. H.T. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DTD18.6.2014 (ANNEXURE-F) IN SO FOR AS THE
SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED.
IN W.P.NO.33279/2016:
BETWEEN:
MR MOHAMMED MUZZAMIL
SON OF MOHAMMED YOUSUFF
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
NO.8, 5TH CROSS, MUNIMARAPPA GARDEN
J. C. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 046
REPRESENTED BY HIS DULY CONSTITUTED
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
307
MR. MOHAMMED YOUSUFF

SON OF MOHAMMED AHMED
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KAMAL M G S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA VEEDHI
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001.

DR T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

DR T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR,AGA FOR R1;

227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE NOTIFICATION BANGALORE
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-2 AT ANNEXURE-A AND AFTER
GOING THROUGH THE PROPRIETY OR OTHERWISE OF ISSUING
THE SAME PASS ORDER/S ISSUE WRIT/S SETTING
ASIDE/QUASH THE SAME TO THE EXTENT OF SCHEDULE
PROPERTY AS SPECIFIED AT SL.NO.1096 OF THE SCHEDULE TO
THE SAID NOTIFICATION; AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.33385/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA,
308
RESIDING AT
VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA),
S R K NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
2. SRI N RAJA
S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY,
RESIDING AT
S R K NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
3. SRI SIDDARAJU
S/O LATE MALAPPA,
RESIDING AT
S R K NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
4. SRI MUNINANJAPPA
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,RESIDING AT
S R K NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
5. SRI MUNIYAPPA
RESIDING AT
S R K NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
6. SRI CHANDRAPPA
RESIDING AT
309

S R K NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONERS
AND:

VIDHANASOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. G.M. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. K.N. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)

SECOND FINAL DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-1
DTD:18.6.2014 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-K TO THE WRIT PETITION
IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER PROPERTY WHICH IS MOREFULLY
DESCRIBED AT THE SCHEDULE AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.34348/2016:
BETWEEN:
ANJENAPPA
S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
310
R/AT A PORTION OF THE SY.NO 84/4,

HENNUR VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 043.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAPEGOWDA B., ADVOCATE &
SRI. DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE CHAIRMAN
KUMAR PARK WEST,

KUMAR PARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE &
SRI. K.R. SREENIVASA PARAVARDHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS NOT TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING OF THE PETITIONER AS SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE
AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.35687/2016:
BETWEEN
1. SMT. AMARAVATHI
WIFE OF LATE M NAGESHAA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 224,
1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA TEMPLE
B CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE
K R PURAM HOBLI
2. CHI VISWNATH GOWDA N

SON OF LATE M NAGESHAA
AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS
(REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND
311
LEGAL GUARDIAN SMT AMARAVATHI)

RESIDING AT NO 224,
K R PURAM HOBLI
3. CHI HEMANTHA GOWDA

SON OF LATE M NAGESHAA
AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS
(REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND
LEGAL GUARDIAN SMT AMARAVATHI)
RESIDING AT NO 224,
K R PURAM HOBLI
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE)
AND:

K.P. WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
2. SPECIAL ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

K P WEST
3. DEPUTY SECRETARY - 1
K P WEST
4. SRI G NAGARAJ
SON OF LATE GANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 10/25
4TH CROSS ROAD,
BANASWADI
M S NAGAR
312
5. SRI B R S KUMAR
SON OF SRI RAJASHEKARAIH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 1105
"SANJEEVINI"
10TH MAIN ROAD
RPC LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGARA
BANGALORE - 560040.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3)

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF R-1 TO 3 IN THE MATTER OF
ALLOTMENT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF LATE SRI. ERANNA VIDE
ALLOTMENT LETTER NO.477/2014-15 DATED 16.09.2014 AT
ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.35851/2016:
BETWEEN
1. SRI J DEVARAJ
S/O. LATE. J M JAYARAM,
GOVT SCHOOL ROAD,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK,
BENGALURU 560 064.
2. SRI. J. MUNISWAMY GOWDA

S/O. LATE. J M JAYARAM,
GOVT SCHOOL ROAD,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BENGALURU- 560 064.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAJANNA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:

313

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
4TH AND 5TH FLOOR,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560 001.

SI.NOS.2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF
T. CHOWDAIAH, (SANKEY) ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGLAURU- 560 020.

SI.NOS. 2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF BENGALURU
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,T. CHOWDAIAH,
(SANKEY) ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGLAURU- 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD:18.6.2014 AS AT ANNEXURE-A IN
SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONERS DEVELOPED
SCHEDULE LAND OF SYNO.20/9 MEASURING 0.21 GUNTA OF
JAKKUR NOTIFIED AS AT SL NO.711 IN PAGE 37 OF THE
NOTIFICATION AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.36525/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI H D NANJE GOWDA

S/O LATE DODDAGULLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 41/1
HENNUR MARUTHI LAYOUT
314
KALYAN NAGAR POST ,

2. SRI H M RAMESH
S/O LATE MUNNE GOWDA @ MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
RESIDING AT 9, 'SRI MARUTHI ARCADE',
HENNUR MARUTHI LAYOUT , 9TH MAIN,
11TH CROSS KALYAN NAGAR POST,
...PETITIONERS
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY
ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 01.
2. THE COMMISSIONER

…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE AND


SECOND FINAL DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-1
DTD:18.6.2014 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-J TO THE WP IN RESPECT
OF THE PETITIONER PROPERTY WHICH IS MOREFULLY
DESCRIBED AT THE SHCEDULE AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.37682/2016:
BETWEEN
1. SRI. SATHISH
315
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

S/O LATE D V NARAYANASWAMY,
R/AT DASARAHALLI,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
2. SRI RAJESH
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
S/O LATE D V NARAYANASWAMY,
R/AT DASARAHALLI,
K. R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560021.
...PETITIONERS

AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-G; AND ETC.,
316
IN W.P.NO.38430/2016:
BETWEEN
1. SRI A MUTHU
S/O LATE ARMUGAM
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 44,
KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2
THANISANDRA VILLAGE
K R PURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
2. SMT SHANTHI
W/O A MUTHU
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 44
KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2
THANISANDRA VILLAGE
K R PURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
3. MR MAHROOQ ABBASIA
W/O S A KHALID
RESIDING AT NO 43,
KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2
THANISANDRA VILLAGE
K R PURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
4. MR AZEEZULLA KHAN
S/O AMANULLA KHAN
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 39, KHATHA NO.1060,
THANISANDRA VILLAGE
K R PURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
5. SMT ABIDA BEGUM

W/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ AHMED
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
317
R/AT NO 197, 3RD MAIN,

3RD CROSS, TUBA LAYOUT
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MOHAMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE)

AND:
VIDHANASOUDHA
2. THE COMMISSIONER
AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD,
3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER


…RESPONDENTS

227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONS, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED
03.02.2003 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-G
SIMILARLY FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY
RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-G1; AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.38919/2016:
BETWEEN
1. SMT HANUMAKKA
W/O LATE KEMPANNA
318

YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BENGALURU-560 064.
2. SMT.K.R.LALITHA
W/O K.RAJANNA,
AGED 56 YEARS,
R/AT SANJEEVINI, #15, SAMPIGE ROAD,
4TH CROSS, MALLESWARA,
BENGALURU-560 003.
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
DEVELOPMENT, 4TH FLOOR
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.

SI.2 & 3 ARE AT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN,
KUMARAPARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020.

AT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARAPARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

227 OF THE CONSTIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTIFICATION DT:18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-A NOTIFIED AT
SL.NO.697 IN PAGE 36 IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE
319
SCHEDULE LAND OF SY.NO.11/10 OF JAKKUR TO AN EXTENT

OF 0.14 TUNTA SITUATE ON NORTH-WEST CORNER OF ENTIRE
LAND; AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.39001/2016:
BETWEEN
MRS. HAMEEDA SHARIFF

W/O MR.FAYAZ SHERIFF,
RESIDING AT NO.17,
DAVIS HABITAT, DAVIS ROAD,
FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005.
DEAD BY LR' S
NAZEEM BABU
D/O.FAYAZ SHERIFF
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
NO.10, 515 CROSS
PILLANNA GARDEN IST STAGE
BANGALORE NORTH
BANGALORE- 560 084.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A.C. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
320

SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;)

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-E
DTD:18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.40151/2016:
BETWEEN
1. P.S. POOVAMMA
D/O LATE P.M.SUBBAIAH,
R/O NO.24, KURUMARADIKERE,
CHITRADURGA TQ AND
DIST-577 501.
2. SRIMATI PONNAMMA (SAMPI)

W/O P.M.SUBBAIAH (SERIAL NO.6260863),
SINCE NOT HOLDING MEMORIES
SHE IS REPRESENTED BY HER DAUGHTER
PETITIONER NO.1 HEREIN ABOVE
R/O NO.7, 5TH CROSS,
ATHMANANDA COLONY,
SULTAN PALYA,
R.T.NAGARA POST,
BANGALORE-560 032.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S.BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
321
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P.WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

BANGALORE
KEMPEGOWDA ROAD,
NEXT TO CAUVERY BHAVAN,
BANGALORE-560 009.
4. THE TAHSILDAR
NEAR BMTC BUS DEPOT
DIESEL SHED ROAD,
KRISHNARAJAPURAM,
BANGALORE-560 016.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4;

SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION FOR
ALLOTMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVE SITE FOR THE ACQUISTION
BY THE RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-F DTD:11.07.2016 AND
FURTHER DIRECT TO ALOT THE ALTERNATIVE SIDE IN THE
SAME LOCALITY OF SY.NO.97 OF RACHANAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE FOR THE SITE NO.119
MEASURING 50X30 AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.40240/2016:
BETWEEN
M/S KIRLOSKAR SYSTEMS LTD

(PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS
M/S KIRLOSKAR ASEA LTD.,)
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 # 08, 7TH FLOOR
EMBASSY STAR, 8 PALACE ROAD,
VASANTNAGAR, BANGALORE - 52
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
322
MR. S. BALAKRISHNA
S/O LATE K SATYANARAYANA.
...PETITONER
(BY SRI. MAHESH S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BY URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT (UDD)
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 01.

AUTHORITY (BDA)
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK - WEST
BANGALORE - 20
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER (NORTH).
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION

OFFICER (NORTH)
AUTHORITY (BDA)
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK - WEST,
BANGALORE - 20.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE
PETITIONER AND TO EXCLUDE THE PETITIONER SAID PROPERTY
FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.41753/2016:
BETWEEN
SMT ANI P RAI

W/O PURUSHOTHAM RAO,
323
R/AT NO.008 DS MAX SHELTON,

NGEF LAYOUT MAIN ROAD,
MALLATHALLI, BANGALORE-560056.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUNITHA H SINGH, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.
REPTD BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 &
2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE
(2010)7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE
PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-N SUBMITTED THROUGH HER
SOCIETY; AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.44127/2016:
BETWEEN:
M/S GRACE GARDEN APARTMENT

OWNERS ASSOCIATION
(A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER
324
THE KSR ACT) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT

GRACE GARDEN APARTMENTS
3RD CROSS, HENNUR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 043
BY ITS PRESIDENT.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BYREGOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

KP WEST, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 020

KP WEST, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR
SMT. M. V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

RESPONDENTS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DEMAND THE PETITIONER
ASSOCIATION TO SELL ITS LAND AT THE COMPENSATION
DETERMINED BY ITS UNILATERALLY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.44146/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. COLONEL K. RAMACHANDRAN
S/O. LATE. KARUNAKARAN,
AGE 70 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 3/7,
FIELD MARSHAL CARIAPPA COLONY,
CUBBON ROAD,
BENGALURU- 560 001
2. V. N. SHAMSUNDAR
S/O. V. S. NATARAJAN,
AGE 55 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 189-H,
325
M.G. COLONY RAILWAY QUARTERS,

OKALIPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 023
3. MAJOR SADASHIVAN K A
S/O. LATE. SHANMUGAN,
AGE 68 YEARS,
R/AT NO. W-7, OLD HAIG LINES,
DEVLALI CAMP,
DISTRICT NASIK,
PINCODE: 422401
4. RAJEEV GOLLARAHALLI
S/O. G. K. RAMAN,
AGE 50 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 4/3,
17TH CROSS,
WEST PARK ROAD,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU - 560055
5. JYOTHI SINGH
W/O. LT. COLONEL MRIGENDRA SINGH,
AGE 59 YEARS,
R/AT M95, 7TH MAIN,
SECTOR 10, JEEVAN BHIMA NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 075
6. SHEELA SIMON
D/O LATE. KOCHAMMA NAIR,
AGE 59 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 1456,SUSHANTH,
FATIMA STREET, KAMANAHALLI
JVV MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560084
7. MULKY DAMODAR KAMATH

S/O. LATE. M. PURUSHOTHAM KAMATH,
AGE 66 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 139,
'UTTAM' AECS LAYOUT,
SANJAYANAGAR RMV II STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560094
326
8. PRASHANTH V
S/O. L. VENKOBA RAO,
R/AT NO. 17, VYSYA BANK COLONY,
SARAKKI MAIN ROAD,
J. P. NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560078
9. RAMESH BABU
S/O. R. SONGUKRISHNASWAMY,
AGE 46 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 138/123,
1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS,
M.S. RAMAIAH NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560094
10. DHRUVAKANTH B. SHENOY

S/O. MR. T. B. G. SHENOY,
AGE 52 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 153/1,
PURNIMA,
AECS LAYOUT,
D. RAJAGOPAL ROD,
SANJAYNAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 094
11. ABHA PATHAK

W/O. DR. PATHAK,
AGE 38 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 28,
SHEETAL NAGAR,
SHAHANOORWADI,
AURANGABAD,
MAHARASHTRA- 4310012
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MOHAMAD AYUB ALI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF MULTISTORIED BUILDING,
BANGALORE VEEDHI,
BANGALORE - 560 001
327
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE - 560 001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE DISTRICT,
REVENUE BHAVAN,
K.G. ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 009
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R3;

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE - F) ISSUED BY
THE R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004
ANNEXURE - G AND ALSO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
18.06.2014 ANNEXURE - M ISSUED BY THE R-1 IS SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO SITE NO. 17, 50.51, 52, 57, 58, 59, 48, 49, 31, 15
BELONGING THE PETITIONERS FORMED IN SYNO. 38/1, 38/2 ,
38/3, 38/4, 38/5 AND 39/3 OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.44246/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. MRS. ALLAIYA
@ ALLAIA JEELANI
W/O MR. TAHIR IMRAN
D/O. SHABBER AHMED JEELANI
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
RESIDENT OF NO.4/2
1ST CROSS, ANNIPURA
OFF DOUBLE ROAD
SUDHAMA NAGAR
BENGALURU-560027
328
2. MR. MUSTAFA MOHIUDDIN JEELANI

S/O SHABBER AHMED JEELANI
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
RESIDENT OF NO.530
12TH CROSS, DOLLARS COLONY
R.M.V 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-560094
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BALARAJ A. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.,
VIKAS SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BDA, KUMARA PARK
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SMT. PAVITHRA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

J IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES BELONGING TO
THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.46319/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. R. B. SATHYANARAYANA SINGH

S/O. LATE SRI. R. BYRAM SINGH,
R/AT NO.42, 10TH A CROSS,
KAVI RAGHAVANKA ROAD,
SRINAGAR,
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH T. S., ADVOCATE)

329
AND:
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020,
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO EXECUTE AND REGISTER THE SALE
DEED IN RESPECT OF ANY RESIDENTIAL SITE IN ARKAVATHI
LAYOUT, BENGALURU AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO. 47314/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. GOWRAMMA
W/O LATE BYRAPPA
R/A K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE,
BBMP WARD # 25, KRISHNARAJAPURA
HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU URBAN DIST
BENGALURU - 560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:

4TH FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001

KURUMAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU - 560020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER
330

OFFICE OF THE BENGALURU
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD
NEAR 5TH MAIN
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003, 23.02.2004 AND 18.06.2014
AS AT ANNEX- A, B & C NOTIFIED AT SL.NO. 50 OF PAGE 108 OF
ANNEX - A IN OS FAR IT RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE LAND OF
SY.NO.22/1 OF K NARAYANAPURA TO AN EXTENT OF 1.23 ACRE
IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO. 47461/2016:
BETWEEN:
PRASANNA P. L. N.
S/O. PUTTA REVANNA,
6TH MAIN, HAMPINAGARA,
BANGALORE-560 104.
REPTD. BY ITS G.P.A. HOLDER,
PUTTA REVANNA,
S/O. LATE SIDDAIAH.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ADINARAYAN, ADVOCATE)

331
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY.
AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
REPT. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. M/S. TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,
NO.17, 1ST FLOOR
YAMUNA BAI ROAD,
MADHAVANAGARA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
REPT. BY ITS PRESIDENT.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI.B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO
ALLOT THE SITE TO THE PETITIONER MEASURING 40' X 60'
FORMED IN SY.NO.17, 18. 19/1 & 31/1 OF VENKATESHPURA
AND SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE
NORTH TALUK BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS OF
THE PETITIONER WHICH ARE AT ANNEX - A & M AND ETC.
332
IN W.P.NO.51143/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. C. MAHESWARAPPA
AGED 57 YEARS,
SON OF SRI.CHENNAVEERAPPA,
NO.54, 5TH CROSS & 6TH CROSS,
1ST MAIN, GEDDALHALLI,
K.NARAYANAPURA POST,
BANGALORE-77
...PETITIONER
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.
AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

ACQUISITION OFFICER
AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
333


ACQUISITITON PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND SY.NO.31/1 GEDDALAHALLI
VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 18.06.2914(ANNEXURE - L) IS ILLEGAL WITHOUT
JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON- EST AND HENCE IN -
OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51144/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT G. B. RATHNAMMA
AGED 56 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRI.B.SHIVALINGAPPA,
NO.71,1ST MAIN ROAD,
5TH CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
334
DEPARTMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.
AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

ACQUISITION OFFICER
AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 & R3)

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1
GEDDAHALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ( ANNEXURE - H) IS ILLEGAL
WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRATY AND NON-EST AND HENCE
IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
335
IN W.P.NO.51145/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. M. S. DEVAKI
NO.78, 2ND CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/2,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J ISSUED BY R-1
IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON- EST
AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
336
IN W.P.NO.51147/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT M. C. RUDRAMMA
AGED 49 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRI.G.S.HALAPPA,
NBO.55, 4TH CROSS,
1ST MAIN, GEDDALHALLI,
K.NARAYANPURA POST,
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 & R3)

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE
IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
337
IN W.P.NO.51352/2016:
BETWEEN:
MR. K. KUBENDRAN
AGED 59 YEARS,
SON OF MR. K. KALIMUTHU
RESIDING AT NO.89 & 90
GEDDALAHALLI,
K.NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001
2. BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SMT. PAVITRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDLAHALLI
VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
338
INCLUDED AT SL.NO. 251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION

DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX- H ISSUED BY R-1 IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE
IN W.P.NO.51353/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI VAREED GEORGE

AGED 46 YEARS
SON OF C. V. GEORGE
NO.65
2ND MAIN ROAD
GEDDALAHALLI
K. NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

339
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.51355/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT S. SAVARIAMMAL
W/O SRI A. LUCAS,
NO.98, 1ST MAIN,
7TH CROSS, GEDDALHALLI,
K. NARAYANAPURA POST,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

340

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND
HENCE, IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51597/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. K. G. RATHNAMMA
WIFE OF SRI. THIPPESWAMY,
RESIDING AT NO.53,
1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
341
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P.NO.51707/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI A. BALARAJ
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE AROKIASWAMY
NO.18, 1ST MAIN
2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI
BANGALORE-560077
2. SMT SALVIUS SUJATHA

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
W/O MR. GIFT IMMANUEL RAJ
NO.18, IST MAIN
2ND CROSS
GEDDALAHALI
BANGALORE-560077
3. SRI MATHEWS MANOJ

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
S/O SRI A BALARAJ
NO.18, 1ST MAIN
2NDCROSS, GEDDALAHALLI
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONERS

342
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-K) IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.51730/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. CHIKKANNA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
343
2. SRI KANTHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
3. RAJANNA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
4. SRI GANGADHARAMURTHY
ALL SONS OF LATE NARAYANAPPA

RESIDING AT NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE,
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.
344
IN W.P.NO.51875 /2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. E. SHANKARAPPA
AGED 63 YEARS,
SON OF ESHWARAPPA.S
NO.81, IST MAIN,
6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. C.R. GOPALSWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL,
345
IN W.P.NO.51876 /2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. ALICE MARY

W/O SRI VICTOR,
NO.97, 2ND MAIN,
GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS


346

IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51877/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI K. V. VENKATA REDDY

AGED 65 YEARS,
S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA,
NO.70, 1ST MAIN,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

347

IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51878/2016:
BETWEEN:
DR. RUMANA RIYAZ

WIFE OF DR. SHAHID AHMED SHAIKH,
NO.80, 1ST MAIN,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE
FOR R2 & R3)
348

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-H IS ILLEGAL,
IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.52141/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHAFEEQ AHMED

S/O LATE SRI.T.R. ABDUL SUBHAN SAB
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
RESIDING AT,
A.N. MANSION,
1ST FLOOR, NO.15,
7TH "A" CROSS, KANNAKANAGAR,
R.T. NAGAR POST,
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE 560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
INFANTRY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.

BANGALORE DEELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MYSORE ROAD,
BANGALORE 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
349

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - C AND DATED
18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-B IS RESPECT OF AFOREMENTIONED
LAND BEARING SITE NO. 7, IN SY.NO.34/8, SITUATED AT THUBA
LAYOUT, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST
TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.52142/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. ATHEEQUE AHMED

S/O. LATE. SRI. T.R. ABDUL SUBHAN SAB,
RESIDING AT
A. N. MANSION,
1ST FLOOR, NO. 15,
7TH-A-CROSS,
KANNAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560 032
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE -560 001

T. CHOWDIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
350

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - B AND DATED
18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - C IS RESPECT OF AFOREMENTIONED
LAND BEARING SITE NO.7, IN SY.NO.34/8, SITUATED AT THUBA
LAYOUT, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST
TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.52928/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI DENNIS JACOB

MAJOR,
SON OF LT. SUNNY JACOB (RETD.)
NO.20, 1ST MAIN,
2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
351

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL,
HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.53240/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SONNAMMA
W/O LATE MUNINANJAPPA,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE - 560 036
2. SRI. D. C. KUMARA
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAMMA,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE - 560 036
3. SRI D. R. SHIVANNEGOWDA
S/O LATE M. RAMAIAH,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE - 560 036
4. SRI. A. MUNEGOWDA
S/O LATE DODDAANJANAPPA
K.R.PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE - 560 036
352
5. SRI T. N. ANJANAPPA
R/AT TARABANAHALLI,
H CROSS, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.
...PETITIONERS
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING,

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H IN SO FAR AS
IN W.P.NO.53525/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI C. VIJAYAN
SON OF SRI.RAVANNUI NAIR,
NO.15, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
353
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST,

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P.NO.53526/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. VIMALA
AGED ABOUR 49 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRI.B.S.DINESH KUMAR,
354
7TH CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI,
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST,

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,

SRI. GOWTHAM DEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT (ANNEXURE - J) IS
ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST
AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
355
IN W.P.NO.53527/2016:
BETWEEN:
MRS. MARY KUTTY MAMMEN

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
W/O MR THOMAS MAMMEN
NO.25, 1ST MAIN
2ND & 3RD CROSS
GEDDALAHALLI
K.NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST,

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,

SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT (ANNEXURE - M) IS
356

IN W.P.NO.53670/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. LOURDU MARY

WIFE OF SRI. FRANCIS,
NO.91, 2ND MAIN,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST,

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

357

IN W.P.NO.54364/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. S. SRIKANTA
S/O LATE SRI SUBBAIAH,
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
R/AT NO.307, 9TH 'A' CROSS,
JAKKUR-YELAHANKA MAIN ROAD,
JAKKUR VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST,
BANGALORE-560 064
2. SMT. SAVITHRI
W/O SRI. S. SRIKANTA,
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
RESIDING AT NO.307,
9TH 'A' CROSS,
JAKKUR-YELAHANKA MAIN ROAD,
JAKKUR VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST,
BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

SANKEY ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

358
SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS
DATED 06.09.2016 AND 23.09.2016 PASSED BY THE R-3 AS PER
ANNEXURE - A & B AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.54790/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. KEMPANNA
S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA,
R/AT NO.30/3
AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE,
SAHAKARANAGARA POST,
BANGALORE-560 092
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. M. D. ANURADHA URS, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP)
N.R. SQUARE,
BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
3. STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

REP BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
359
KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. I. G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR RR2 & R3;

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO
ACQUIRE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW
AND GRANT REASONABLE COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55126/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. S. N. BASAVARAJU
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA
R/AT NO.27 SAMPIGEHALLI
YELAHANKA HOBLI
JAKKUR POST
BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

360

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-D ISSUED BY R-1 IN
SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55667/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI S. G. JAYADEVAIAH
SON OF SRI. S.GANGA SETTY,
NO.82, 1ST MAIN,
6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
361

KUMARA PARK WEST,


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEXURE - J] IS
IN W.P.NO.55737/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. R. PARASHURAM REDDY
S/O S. RAMACHANDRA REDDY,
R/AT NO.A-146, ANUGRAHA NILAYA,
9TH CROSS, KHB COLONY,
SARASWATHIPURAM,
CHITRADURGA-577501
2. SAMPATH KUMAR
SON OF GANGAPPA,
NO.246, 16TH BLOCK, SMIG-A,
4TH PHASE, HOUSING BOARD COLONY,
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN,
BANGALORE-560064
3. SMT.ANURUDHA S M
W/O SUBRAMANAYA SHARMA T.V.,
R/AT NO.344, 16TH A MAIN,
362
4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,

BANGALORE-560041
4. K.G.POONACHA
S/O K.S.GANAPATHI
R/AT UARTER NO.G.1114
CENTER TOWNSHIP, HAL,
BANGALORE-570037
5. A.K.LOGANATHAN
S/O K.KRISHNAMURTHY
R/AT NO.2BM, 326, OMBR LAYOUT,
BHUVANAGIRI,
BANGALORE-560043
6. G.HARISH
S/O C.GOWDA CHITHAPPA
R/AT NO.3087, 14TH B MAIN ROAD,
8TH 'C' CROSS ROAD,
HAMPINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560040
7. P.P.SATHYANARAYANA
S/O LATE P.M.PEMMAIAH
R/AT NO.321-8, (206/3A),
DEVAKI NILAYA, 7TH B CROSS,
3RD MAIN, JAKKASANDRA,
KORAMANGALA,
BANGALORE-560034
8. K.D.NANJE GOWDA
S/O LATE DODDASHANAIAH
R/AT NO.927, 1ST BLOCK, II STAGE,
2ND 'A' CROSS ROAD,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560079
9. M.NANDISH MURTHY
S/O LATE D.C.MALLARADHYA
363
R/AT NO.20, 1ST CROSS ROAD,

ANUBHAVANAGAR,
NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD,
AND:

DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST,


THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -N
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56022/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. MAJELLA THOMAS

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
WIFE OF SRI. SIBY XAVIER
NO. 24, 1ST MAIN, 2ND & 3RD CROSS
GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE - 560 077. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)

364
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- G] IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.56023/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. MAJELLA C. THOMAS

WIFE OF SRI SIBY XAVIER
365
NO.24, 1ST MAIN

2ND & 3RD CROSS GEDDALAHALLI,
K NARAYANAPURA POST,
BANGALORE 560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- J] IS ILLEGAL,
366
IN W.P.NO.56971/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI C. P. SRINATH
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O SRI C. PERIASWAMY,
NO.85,1ST MAIN,
6TH CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- J] IS ILLEGAL,
367

IN W.P.NO.56972/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. FAYAZ KHAN

S/O. SRI. YASEEN KHAN,
NO. 48,2ND MAIN,
8TH CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE 560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

368
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- K IS ILLEGAL,

IN W.P.NO.57149/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. R. SHYLAJA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
WIFE OF SRI. C.S. RAJENDRA
NO. 38, 1ST MAIN,
3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

369

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- J IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.57151/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. NEELAMMA KUTTAPPA

W/O SRI K A KUTTAPPA,
NO.9, 2ND CROSS,
2ND MAIN, GEDDALAHALLI,
K NARAYANAPURA POST,
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

370

IN W.P.NO.57709/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. A APPANNA
S/O LATE ANJIANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
2. SRI MUNEGOWDA
S/O A. APPANNA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
3. SRI A. SATHISH
S/O APPAIANNA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
4. SRI. R. ANAND
S/O LATE A RAMESH
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
5. SRI R HARISH
S/O LATE A RAMESH
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT

JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA TOWN
PIN - 560 032
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
VIDHANA SOUDHA
371
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST
T CHOWDIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
T CHOWDIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

SCHEME KNOWN AS 'ARKAVATHI LAYOUT' IN RESPECT OF LAND
BEARING SY.NO.63/1 MEASURING 28 GUNTAS SITUATED AT
JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH
TALUK, NOTIFIED BY PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED
IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.03.2003 AND PART -III
NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNEXURE - C OF THE R-2 AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 18.06.2014,
IN PART III VIDE BEARING NO. 380 NOTIFICATION DATED
08.12.2014, AS PER ANNEX - K HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION
27 OF BDA ACT AND; GRANT CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF/S
THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57937/2016:
BETWEEN:
DR. M. T. RAJA REDDY

S/O LATE MALLESHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
372
RESIDING AT NO 602,
2ND MAIN, KALYAN NAGAR,
2ND BLOCK
BANGALORE - 560043. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CLIFTON D ROZARIO, ADVOCATE)
AND:

CHOWDIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020

CHOWDIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020
3. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 [ PLACED
AS ANNEXURE -W] INSOFAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LAND OF
THE PETITIONER MEASURING 37 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.31/1,
SITUATED AT CHELKERE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK AND ALL CONSEQUENT ACTIONS
THERETO, INCLUDING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R-1 [PLACED AS
ANNEXURE - X] AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.58218/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. ANITHA SURYA KUMAR

WIFE OF SRI M. SURYA KUMAR
NO.27, 2ND MAIN,
5TH CROSS,
373
GEDDALAHALLI VILALGE
K.NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST
T CHOWDIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
T CHOWDIAH ROAD


374
IN W.P.NO.58222/2016:
BETWEEN:
MR. SHAIK MAROOF NADEEM

SON OF MR.MOHAMMED SHUJATHULLA
NO.43, 2ND MAIN,
7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILALGE
K.NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T CHOWDIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.M. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

375
IN W.P.NO.58734/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. ANITHA B. N.
W/O. CHANNAPPA,
R/AT NO. 20,12TH CROSS,
4TH MAIN,YELLAMMA TEMPLE STREET,
SRINIVASA NAGAR,
BANGALORE 560050
2. V. S. CHINCHOLI
S/O. LATE. SANGRAMAPPA,
NO. 69,SUGUMA LAYOUT,
NYANAPPANAHALLI,
BEGUR POST,
BANGALORE - 560068
3. SHAMAIAH L.,
S/O. LATE. LAKSHMAIAH,
R/AT NO. 106/2,
7TH CROSS ROAD,
NANJA REDDY COLONY,
H.A.L. POST,
BANGALORE - 560017
4. SMT. S. SANGEETHA
W/O. K A SAHADEV RAO,
R/AT 12/7-1, SRI. MOUNAGURU MATTA ROAD,
THIMMAIAH GARDEN,
DODDIGUNTE, COX TOWN,
BANGALORE - 560 005
5. S T JAGANNATHA
S/O. S D THAMMANNA,
R/AT NO. 17,
SRI. RANGADHAMA,
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
SINGAPUR LAYOUT,
VIDYARANDAPURA POST,
BANGALORE 560097
376
6. SMT. SUMANGALA
D/O. LATE. B G CHIKKAVENKATAIAH,
R/AT 3977 A,
1ST FLOOR,3RD MAIN,
18TH CROSS, K.R. ROAD,
K.S.K. II STAGE,
BANGALORE- 560070
7. MANJUNATH R.
S/O. LATE. RATHNAM,
BRINDAVAN LAYOUT,
VIJINAPURAM,
BANGALORE - 560 016
8. SMT. ASHA D
W/O. DEVA RAO V,
R/AT NO. 42, 1ST FLOOR,
II MAIN, 2ND CROSS,
M. N. BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560032
9. JAYARAMA H C
S/O. B V CHELUVARAYASWAMY,
R/AT NO. 327,
HONGELAKSHMI NILAYA,
3RD MAIN, VHBS LAYOUT,
NEAR GKW LAYOUT,
VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE- 560 040
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C.M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGLAORE 560001.
377

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
….RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - M
IN W.P.NO.59166/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI C. CHOWRAPPA
SON OF LATE CHINNAPPA
BANGALORE-560077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
378

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE- K] IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.59168/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI M. V. RAMA REDDY

S/O. SRI. M. VENKATARAMANA REDDY,
NO. 4, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE - 560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
379

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- H IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.59317/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. V SHIVAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
S/O LATE B M VEERAIAH
R/AT UTI, BAN RAC
NO.119, 80 FT ROAD
7TH BLOCK, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE-560 095
2. V SUNDAR
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O LATE S V RAMAN
NO.1758
3RD CROSS
RAM MOHANPUAM
SRIRAMPURAM POST
BANGALORE-560 021
3. M TUKARAM NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O LATE M NARAYAN NAYAK
R/AT NO.18
1ST C MAIN
5TH D CROSS
380
CHOKKALAPPA LAYOUT
KASTURINAGAR
BANGALORE-560 043
4. SRINIVASAN T V
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O LATE T M VAIKUNTAPPA
R/AT 2235
4TH MAIN ROAD
4TH CROSS ROAD
RPC LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE
BANGALORE-560 040
5. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA N
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O LATE NANJAPPA
R/AT NO.8
SHANTHISADANA
1ST FLOOR
4TH MAIN
SHIVANAGARA
BANGALORE-560 010
6. K S CHANDRAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
D/O LATE SIDDAIAH
R/AT NO.42
11TH CORSS
2ND MAIN
PRASHANTH NAGAR
BANGALORE-560 040
7. S R GOPALACHAR
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O LATE S M RAMACHANDRACHAR
R/AT NO.63, 4TH MAIN
SARVABHOUMA NAGAR
CHIKKALASANDRA
BANGALORE-560 061
8. V CHANDRASEKARAN
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
S/O LATE G VENKATESAN
R/AT NO.162
BEML LAYOUT
381
KAMALANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 079
9. T K VALSALAN
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
S/O LATE C ACHUTHAN
R/AT NO.A , 422
II STAGE,3RD PHASE
2ND B CROSS ROAD
5TH MAIN
DOMLUR VILLAGE
BANGALORE-560 071
10. JAVANT G BHATIA

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
S/O LATE GOVINDJI N BHATIA
R/AT NO.S007
KRISHNA GREEN APARTMENT
KRISHNA TEMPLE ROAD
DODDABOMMASANDRA
BANGALORE-560 097
11. J V GURU MURTHY

AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
S/O LATE J VENKATARAYAPPA
BASAVESHWARALAYOUT
BEML III STAGE
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR
BANGALORE-560 098
...PETITIONERS
AND:

DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVLEOPMENT
M S BUILDING
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARAPARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
REPTD.BY ITS COMMISSIONER
382
3. THE SPECIAL LAND

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARAPARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3))

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -P
IN W.P.NO.59793/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. M LEO
S/O C MARIYAPPA,
R/AT H.A. FARM, MARIYANNA PALYA,
BANGALORE-560024
2. M RAVINDRA KUMAR
S/O C MARIYAPPA,
R/AT H.A.FARM,MARIYANNA PALYA,
BENGALURU-560024
3. M ANTHONY REDDY
S/O C MARIYAPPA,
R/AT H.A.FARM,MARIYANNA PALYA,
BENGALURU-560024
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAGHUPATHY T N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REP BY SECRETARY,
M S BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001
383

KUMARA PARK WEST,
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020
REP BY ITS SOMMISSIONER
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HULIGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARRE THAT THE
NOTICE DATED 06.09.2016 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY THE R-2
IS ILLEGAL AND QUASH THE SAME AND ETC
IN W.P.NO.60064/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. NARAYANAMMA
WIFE OF LATE GUNDU RAO
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
RESIDING AT DOOR NO 22,
1ST FLOOR BALAJI LAYOUT
R T NAGAR POST
BANGALORE - 560042
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY - 2

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 )
384

RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH EXECUTE ABSOLUTE SALE
DEEDS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE
PROCEEDINGS DATED 04.07.2016 [VIDE ANNEXURE -G TO K]
FOR ALLOTMENT OF 40% OF THE DEVELOPED AREA IN TERMS
OF GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 18.03.2011 [ANNEXURE - E]
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.63172/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. P K MOHAN KUMAR
SON OF LATE N.P. MENON,
RESIDENT OF NO.503,
USHAKIRAN APARTMENTS,
25, HAUDIN ROAD,
ULSOOR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560042.
2. HARIKRISHNAN RAMACHANDRAN
SON OF K. RAMACHANDRAN,
RESIDINT OF LAKSHMY SADANAM,
M G KAVU,
TRICHUR,
KERALA-680581.
3. H.N. VIJAYAN
SON OF SRI. H.B. NANJAN,
R/AT NO.14, SRIRAM NAGAR,
THUDIYALUR,
COIMBATORE-641101.
4. SMT. ASHA J SATISH KUMAR

WIFE OF SRI. J. SATISH KUMAR,
RESIDENT OF NO. 200, SUJAN 2ND CROSS,
RAMGOPAL LAYOUT,
385
SUBBANAPALYA,
BANSWADI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560044.
5. SMT. C. BHAVANI
WIFE OF V K CHANDRASEKHARAN,
RESIDENT OF 26/46,
PERUMAL KOIL GARDEN STREET
SOWCARPET
CHENNAI-600 079.
6. SMT. KAMLESH AHMED

WIFE OF FAROOQ AHMED,
RESIDENT OF NO.304,
4TH CROSS. 3RD BLOCK,
HRBR LAYOUT,
KALYAN NAGAR,
BANGALORE 560 043.
7. SMT. SHEILA SARIN

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
WIFE OF LATE CAPT. V.P.S SARIN,
RESIDENT OF NO.30, DEFENCE COLONY,
IIND MAIN, INDIRANAGAR
BANGALORE-560038.
8. P.K. PADMANABHAN
SON OF LATE P.S. KUPPUSWAMY IYER
RESIDENT OF AT NO.334, 17TH CROSS,
9TH MAIN ROAD,
INDIRANAGAR IIND STAGE,
BANGALORE 560 038.
9. KENNETH PINTO
SON OF P F PINTO,
RESIDENT OF DELPHI II 704 ACROPOLIS 20,
HOSUR ROAD,
BANGALORE 560 029.
...PETITIONERS
386
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001.

ARKAVATHY LAYOUT,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
(BY SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR


REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONERS IN
THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND
IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE
GRNAT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN
REASONABLE TIME AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.63308/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MUSTAQ AHMED A.S.

S/O. A.A. SHAFIULLA,
C/O. # 195, 4TH CROSS,
RASHADNAGAR,
ARABI COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE-560 045.
2. SRI. MUNEEB AHMED TIRUPATTUR

S/O. T. MOHAMMAD GHOUSE,
C/O. #195, 4TH CROSS,
RASHADNAGAR,
ARABI COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE-45.
387
3. SRI. NAJMA SULTHANA

W/O. SRI. MOHAMMAD ILYYAS,
R/O. #15, 6TH CROSS,
K.G. HALLI,
BANGALORE-45.
4. SRI. MOHAMMAD ISMAIL

S/O. ABDUL RAZACK,
R/O. #78, III MAIN,
MUNIRAMMA BLOCK,
BANGALORE-560 032.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SATISH M. DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MINISTRY,
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE
RESPONDENTS FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONERS FROM
THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES WITHOUT FOLLOWING
THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ETC.
388
IN W.P.NO.64534/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI K. PARTHASARATHY
S/O SRI K SUBBARAO
AGD ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO 150, 1ST FLOOR,
16TH MAIN,
BANASHANKARI I STAGE,
II BLOCK,
BENGALURU - 560050
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. T.N. VISHWANATHA, ALONG WITH
SRI. T.N. RAMESH, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER
BELLARY ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001. ….RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADV)

ENDORSEMENT /NOTICE DATED 09.08.2016 VIDE ANNEX-H AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.64705/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. C. CHOWRAPPA

389
AND:
M.S. BUILDING,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGLAORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P.NO.65118/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. APPAIANNA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
2. NARAYANA SWAMY
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
3. NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
390
4. KRISHNAPPA
SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED
BY HIS DAUGHTER YASHODA
5. MUNISONNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
6. ANJINAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
7. LAKSHMANA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ALL ARE CHILDREN OF

LATE CHIKKAPPAIAH,
RESIDING AT THANISANDRA
K. R. PURAM HOBLI
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. Y. S. H. REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:

MULTI STORED BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX -D DATED
18.06.2014 AND ETC.
391
IN W.P.NO.65121/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI H. JAIMUNI
S/O LATE HANUMATHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.96
PRAKRUTHI LAYOUT
1ST MAIN,1ST CROSS
KALYAN NAGAR POST
BANGALORE-560 043
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P. M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMAR PARK WEST, T. CHOWDIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
T. CHOWDIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 020
….RESPONDENTS
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

SCHEME KNOWN AS 'ARKAVATHI LAYOUT' IN RESPECT OF LAND
BEARING SY.NO.94/9 MEASURING 1 ACRE 8 GUNTAS AND 2
GUNTAS KARAB SITUATED THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM
HOBLI , BANGALORE EAST TALUK, NOTIFIED BY PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED
03.02.2003 AND PART-III NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX - E OF THE
392
R-2 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE

DATED 23.02.2004, PART III VIDE BEARING NO. 274,
NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX-F, FURTHER FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 18.06.2014, VIDE ANNEX -G HAVE LAPSED UNDER
SECTION 27 OF BDA ACT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.182/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. T M DILIP KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
SON OF LATE E. U. SHEKAR MENON
RESIDENT OF NO.NO.F6
KRISHNA HEAVEN, N.R.I LAYOUT
KALKERE
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 043
2. HARISH C. DHINGRA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
SON OF LATE D. N. DHINGRA
RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.2, T-2
SHIVAJIMANIRAM APARTMENTS
GANDHIMANDAPAM ROAD
KOTTURPURAM
CHENNAI-600085
3. MANIKKOTHE MOHAN KUMAR

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
SON OF P M R NAMBIAR
RESIDENT OF KOYA MANGALAM
OTTA PALAM-1
PALGHAT DISTRICT
KERALA-679 101
...PETITIONERS
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 001
393

ARKAVATHY LAYOUT
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF
IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE
GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN
IN W.P.NO.815/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. P.G. SREENATH

S/O. LATE. P R GOPALAKRISHNA IYENGAR,
R/AT NO. 572ND CROSS,
UTI BANK RAC,
80 FEET ROAD,
III PHASE, 4TH BLOCK,
BANASHANKARI III STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560085
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MURALIDHAR H.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU 560020.
DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPOMENT,
394
M.S. BUILDING, VIKASA SOUDHA,

BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. M.V. THANUJA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE R-1 TO REGISTER AND PUT THE
PETITIONER IN [PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF SITE NO. BK -90,
MEASURING 9X12 METERS AT ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, 18TH
BLOCK, BENGALURU, IN LIEU OF SITE NO. 748, WHICH WAS
ALLOTED AND REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER
AS PER ANNX - A AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2066/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. ASHWATHAMMA
W/O LATE SRI. PILLARAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.103
CHOWDAPPA LAYOUT
K. NARAYANAPURA RAOD
S. R. K. NAGAR POST
THANISANDRA
BENGALURU-560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GURU PRASAD A., ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SCRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
MULTISTORYED BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD
NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
395
GUTTAHALLI
BENGALURU-560020

SANKEY ROAD
NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
GUTTAHALLI
BENGALURU-560020
4. THE SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER

SANKEY ROAD
NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
GUTTAHALLI
BENGALURU-560020

SANKEY ROAD
NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
GUTTAHALLI
BENGALURU-560020
….RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA)

FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX - A ISSUED
BY RESPONDENTS UNDER SEC. 19(1) OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT ACT 1976 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION
SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.3178/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT C. M. CHANDRAKALA
W/O SRI K. PRAKASH,
R/AT 483, 5TH CROSS,
4TH MAIN, 4TH STAGE,
BEML LAYOUT,
396
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR,
2. SMT. RATHNAMMA B.
W/O LATE BODAPPA,
R/AT NO. 43, AGS LAYOUT,
M.S.R NAGAR,
3. SMT. K. VASANTHA KUMARI

W/O K.V. ANANTHA,
R/AT NO. 1019,
GROUND FLOOR, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
II STAGE, WEST OF CARD ROAD,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
4. S. P. NATARAJ
S/O J. T. PUTTASWAMY,
R/AT NO. 7/B, KANNAN NILAYA,
5TH CROSS ROAD,
MAGADI ROAD,
5. SRINIVAS
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH,
R/AT NO. 1214, 11TH B CROSS,
II STAGE, WEST OF CORD ROAD,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
6. M.S. KUMAR
S/O M.S.SATYANARAYANA,
R/AT NO. 139, 3RD CROSS,
4TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE,
III PHASE, 6TH BLOCK,
BANASHANKARI,
7. H. BASAVARAJ GOWDA
397
S/O CHANNANA GOWDA,

R/AT NO.B-291, 2ND 'A' MAIN,
12TH WARD, AYYAPPA NAGAR,
8. M NARAYANASWAMY
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA,
R/AT NO.G-782, 6TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN CTS, HAL COLONY,
MARATHAHALLI,
9. SMT. B.S. KAMALU

W/O S.B.KRISHNA RAO,
R/AT NO.90, 4TH BLOCK,
TYAGARAJA NAGAR,
10. S. CHANDRASHEKAR RAO

S/O SIDDARAMUJI RAO,
R/AT KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
...PETITIONERS
AND:

DEPT OF HOUSING &
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPT BY ITS SECRETARY.

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND

ACQUISITION OFFICER
398

KUMARA PARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -N
IN W.P.NO.4293/2017:
BETWEEN:
SHRI CHAND PASHA

S/O MOHAMMED MASTAN SAHIB,
R/AT NO. 4, SHANTHAVEERAPPA LANE,
CHICKPET CROSS,
BANGALORE - 560 052
...PETITIONER
AND:

REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKAS SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020,

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS
399

ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE B
TO G PROPERTIES BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS INSTIUTED
UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE SCHEDULE - A PROPERTY FOR
FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT VIDE ANNEX-L R-2 AND
THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX - P R-
1 TO HAVE BEEN ABANDONED AND LAPSED AND HENCE HAVE
BECOME INOPERATIVE IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE -B TO G
PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.4400/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI R. NARAYANA SWAMY

S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
2. SRI PRAKASH
3. SRI. SURESH
SL.NO.1 TO 3 RESIDING AT
K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE,
KOTHANUR POST,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE
4. SRI M. NARASIMHAIAH
S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA,
R/AT NO.182,
HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,
HUNASAMARANAHALLI POST,
JALA HOBLI,
BANGALORE
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE)
400
AND:

M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
3. THE LAND ACQUISITIION OFFICER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY R-2 UNDER
SEC.17(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-G ISSUED BY R-2 AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 UNDER
SEC.19(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-H ISSUED BY R-1 AND RE-
MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, ISSUED BY R-1
U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-J ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO
FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTIES BEARING SY.NO.60/1
MEASURING 34 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.56/8, MEASURING 2
GUNTAS OF K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK, IS CONCERNED AS LAPSED IN TERMS
OF SEC. 25(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND
TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND
RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
401
IN W.P.NO.4511/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI C. RAJU
S/O LATE CHIKKATHIMMAIAH,
R/AT NO.31/A, 18TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN
MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE-560 053
...PETITIONER
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

CONSIDER THE REPORT OF THE R-3 VIDE ANNEX - D AND TO
ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE
SCHEME AND ETC.
402
IN W.P.NO.5036/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI T. S. SATHYANARAYAN
S/O SUNDARA RAJAN,
AGED 56 YEARS,
R/AT NO.765, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
'A' BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-560010
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE )
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KRNATAKA

URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
BENGALURU-560001

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEX-M, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONERS
403
IN W.P.NO.5037/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI T. S. RADHIKA
W/O P. K. RAMAMURTHY
AGED 60 YEARS
R/AT NO.1366, KAVITHA JAIN ROAD
GIRINAGAR, 2ND PHASE
BSK 3RD STAGE
BENGALURU-560085
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. B. CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE )
AND:

DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARAPARK WEST
BENGALURU-560020

KUMARAPARK WEST
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUE BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEX-J, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER'S
404
IN W.P.NO.5073/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. D. LALI VERGHESE

W/O VERGHESE
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.3/1
AND 4/3
AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE
K. R. PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. S. BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

SCHEME AND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE
RESPONDENTS, PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 BY THE
R-2 (ANNEXURE -E) AND NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004
ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT,
1976[ANNEXURE-F] HAVE LAPSED, IN SO FAR THE PETITION
SCHEDULE PROPERTY COMPRISED IN SY NO. 3/1 AND 4/3 OF
AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
405
IN W.P.NO.5207/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. RADHA
W/O MR M. THIMME GOWDA
AGED 56 YEARS
NO.32,1ST MAIN
3RD CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-506 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL,
406
IN W.P.NO.5208/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. L. B. MUNILAKSHMAMMA
AGEDA BOUT 45 YEARS
WIFE OF SRI VENKATESH
NO.74
2ND MAIN
GEDDALAHALLI
K NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

407

IN W.P.NO.5213/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT PRABHA RAJAN

W/O SRI. S.M. RAJAN
NO.74, 1ST MAIN,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

408

IN W.P.NO.5214/2017:
BETWEEN
SMT. E. KOUSALYA
WIFE OF LATE S.KANNAIAH,
NO.113, 1ST MAIN,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

409

IN W.P.NO.5218/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. K. SHARATH BABU

S/O MR. K. KAMALANATHAN,
2. MRS. KAVITHA PRIYADARSHINI

W/O MR. K. SHARATH BABU,
BOTH AT NO.41,
2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONERS
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
410

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.5221/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. LOURDU MARY

W/O SRI. FRANCIS,
NO.7, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
411

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE [ANNEXURE - H] IS
ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST
IN W.P.NO.5301/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT JOYCE SUNDER

W/O MR J. SUNDER SINGH,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9
KHATA NO. 619 & 620,
K R PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560077
2. SRI DEEPAK J. SUNDER

S/O MR J SUNDER SINGH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9,
KHATA NO 619 & 620,
K R PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560077
3. SMT REBECCA MONISHA SUNDER

W/O JAWAHAR BYRAN RAJEEVA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
KHATA NO 619 & 620,
K R PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560077
412
4. SMT MOLLY MCINTYRE

W/O E M MCINTYRE
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
KHATA NO 619 & 620,
K R PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560077
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. M. S. BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560001

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

SCHEME AND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE
RESPONDENT PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976, BY THE
R-2 VIDE ANNEX-E AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004
ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 1976 VIDE ANNEX-F, HAVE LAPSED,
IN SO FAR AS THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE
SCHEDULED COMPRISED IN SY.NO.3/1 AND 4/3 OF AMANI
413
BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST

TALUK ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.5593/2017:
BETWEEN:
MR. T CHANDRASHEKAR
S/O M.THIRUVENKATASHETTY,
NO.27, 8TH CROSS,
MAGADI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 023.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKAS SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SMT. PAVITHRA A RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ACQUISITION
PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY
BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER INSTITUTED UNDER
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX-E
414
AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-F

NOTIFIED FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.5936/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. C. MANJULA
W/O V L N MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/A NO.4/1, SHARADH NILAYA
1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS
BASAVESHWAR LAYOUT
NAGASHETTYHALLI
BANGALORE-560094
2. SMT B. SHAHIKALA
W/O H. P. NINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/A NO.50, 8TH CROSS
3RD MAIN, 2ND BLOCK
TALAKAVERI NAGAR
AMRUTHALLI
BANGALORE-560092
3. SMT V KALAVATHI
W/O S VINAYAK
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/A NO.90, 1ST FLOOR,
3RD MAIN, 2ND CROSS
KALYAN NAGAR
NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD
BANGALORE-560072
4. BHANUMATHI N
D/O T N NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/A NO.84, B G S LAYOUT
NEAR DOUBLE ROAD
JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064
5. S. KRISHNA PRASAD
S/O LATE S SUBBA RAO
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/A NO.8, "YASHASVI"
415
13TH MAIN, 16TH CROSS

MALLESHWARAM
BANGALORE-560055
6. M RAM MOHAN
S/O A NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
R/A NO.92, 4TH MAIN
SANJAY NAGAR
BANGALORE-560094
7. SMT K. SUMA
D/O VASUDEVAMAYYA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/A NO.4267, SHANTI NIVAS
SUBRAMANYA NAGARA
BANGALORE-560021
8. SMT UMA L RAO

D/O T L RAO
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/A NO.92
4TH MAIN, NGEF LAYOUT
SANJAY NAGAR
BANGALORE-560094
9. K. SURYANARAYANA MAYYA
S/O VASUDEVA MAYYA
R/A NO.92
4TH MAIN, NGEF LAYOUT
SANJAY NAGARA
BANGALORE-560094
10. H. S. RUKHMINI
W/O S. KRISHNA MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/A NO.157, F-01
SRI. NAJUDESHWARA RESIDENCY
BEML 4TH STAGE DOUBLE ROAD
R R NAGAR
BANGALORE-560098
11. SMT. KAMALA SHANKAR

W/O P N SHANKAR
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
NO.252, PALACE LOWER ARCHARD
416
SADASHIVANAGAR
BANGALORRE-560080
12. HIDAYATULLA KHAN

S/O AHAMEDULLA KHAN
MAJOR
1ST CROSS, KALISIPALYA
NEW EXTENSION
BANGALORE-560002
13. SMT B. K. JAGADAMBA

D/O B K BASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/A NO.504/1
4TH MAIN ROAD, KENGERI
UPANAGARA
BANGALORE-560060
14. MADHU SHREE C. R.

W/O C R RAVINDRA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
NO.107, SAVERIN PARK APARTMENT
BUILDING, NO.56
K. R. NAGAR
BANGLAORE-560004
15. R SRINIVASAIAH
S/O LATE RANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/A NO.55
6TH MAIN, 40TH CROSS
5TH BLOCK,JAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-11
16. SHANKAR NARAYAN

S/O LATE NINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/A NO.389/7
METRO LAYOUT
NAYANDAHALLI
BANGALORE-560039
17. K V CHINANNA
S/O LATE VENKAT KRISHNA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
NO.50, HANUMA NILAYA
417
5TH CROSS, K P AGRAHARA

MAGADI ROAD
BANGALORE-560023
18. R. CHANDRA SHEKAR

S/O LATE D.M. RAMASWAMY
AGE 58 YEARS,
NO.25, SOUTH END ROAD,
BASAVANAGUDI,
BANGALORE- 560 004
19. K. SRINIVAS
S/O LATE K. NARAYAN RAO
AGED 58 YEARS
NO.18/2, ISEC CAMPUS,
NAGARBHAVI POST,
BANGALORE 560 072.
20. N.S. VENKATANARAYANAPPA

S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA
AGE 46 YEARS,
NO.106, VYSHNAVI, 2ND MAIN,
BEST COUNTY 2, HESSARGHATA MAIN ROAD,
CHIKK ABETTAHALLI,
BANGALORE - 560 097
REPRESENTED BY G.P.A.
HOLDER N. MURALI
21. N.R. CHANDRA SHEKAR

S/O LATE RUDRAPPA
AGE 71 YEARS,
NO.408, 22ND MAIN
J.P. NAGARA
2ND STAGE,
MYSORE - 08
22. SMT. B. KAMALAKSHI

W/O C.R. CHANDRANNA
AGE MAJOR
NO.204/B, 6TH MAIN,
27TH CROSS,
3RD BLOCK JAYANAGAR
23. FAROOQ MUNAVAR

S/O LATE PEER MUNAVAR
418
AGED 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.46,
1ST FLOOR, ST. THOMAS ROAD,
KACHARKANAHALLI,
BANGALORE- 560 087.
24. CHITLUR NAGARAJ DILEEP

S/O C.S. NAGARAJ,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
NO.397, 24TH B CROSS,
BANASHANKRI 2ND STAGE,
BANGALORE .
25. D.M. PARVATHAMMA

D/O T.B. RAJSHEKAR
MAJOR
NO.676, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT,
26. D.M. NAGAMANI

W/O D.T. SHIVA PRASAD,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
NO.91, BINNY LAYOUT,
VIJAYNAGAR 2ND STAGE,
27. M.P. KEMPAIAH

S/O LATE PUTTAPPA
AGED 82 YEARS
NO.558, D BLOCK,
1ST STAGE,J.P. NAGAR
MYSORE- 08.
28. INDU PRASAD

W/O B.S. SHIV PRASAD
AGED 47 YEARS,
NO.69, 5TH CROSS,
BAPUJI LAYOUT,
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYNAGAR,
29. R. GOVIND RAJAN

S/O A. RAJGOPALA BHATA,
AGED 48 YEARS
REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER
419
R. GOPAL KRISHNA
2ND CROSS, SAI GARDEN
VIDYARANYAPURA,
30. N.S. RAVIKIRAN

S/O NAMARANGAIAH SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
NO.40/8, PATTANKAR LAYOUT,
13TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN
MALLESHWARAM
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. B. M. HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S. BUILDING
BANGALORE 560 01

T. CHOWDAIAH HALL,
BANGALORE - 560020.

BANGLAORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH HALL,
BANGALORE- 560020
4. M/S TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
NO.12/3A, NANDAGOKULA,
YAMUNABAI ROAD,
MADHAVANAGAR
BANGALORE
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
420

ANNEX-L IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY
CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.6637/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI HARIRAJAN C
S/O LATE CHINNATHAMBI,
#J-175, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
HANUMANTHAPURAM, SRIRAMPURAM,
BENGALOORU-560021.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VEERABHADRAIAH M. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA)

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALOORU-560020.
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
BENGALOORU-560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 SERVED)

RESPONDENTS TO ALLOTMENT OF AN ALTERNATIVE SITE
BEARING NO.6/A, MEASURING 30X40 FEET, 3RD STAGE, III
PHASE, 6TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI, BENGALURU IN FAVOUR
OF THE PETITIONER INSTEAD OF SITE BEARING NO. 1458,
MEASURING 9 X 12 METERS, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, 11TH BLOCK,
BENGALURU AND ETC.
421
IN W.P.NO.6998/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. V. M. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O LATE MARGABANDHU
AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
R/A NO.86/33, 8TH MAIN
RAJAMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION
BANGALORE-560080
...PETITIONER
AND:
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CONSIDER
THE REPORT OF R-3 AT ANNEX - C AND TO ALLOT AN
ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE SCHEME AND
ETC
422
IN W.P.NO.6999/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI GOWRISHANKAR
S/O. SUBRAMANYA,
R/AT NO. 1971,
4TH CROSS,
28TH MAIN, JP NAGAR,
2ND PHASE,
BANGALORE 560078
...PETITIONER
AND:
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3

CONSIDER THE REPORT OF THE R-3 AT ANNEX - D AND TO
ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE
SCHEME AND ETC.
423
IN W.P.NO.7000/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI K SATYANARAYANA
S/O V.M. KRISHNAMURTHY
R/AT NO.86/33, 8TH MAIN,
RAJAMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION,
BANGALORE 560 080.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

ETC.
424
IN W.P.NO.7001/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. ANNAPOORNI
W/O LATE V M DORAISWAMY,
R/AT NO.227, BASAVANAPURA ROAD,
DEVASANDRA, K.R.PURAM,
BANGALORE-560036
...PETITIONER
AND:
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

ETC.
425
IN W.P.NO.10503/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. B. ANJANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
S/O LATE BACHANNA
R/AT NO.21
K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
KOTHANUR POST
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEXURE-J IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.
426
IN W.P.NO.10504/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
2. SRI SHAMANNA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
BOTH ARE SONS OF

LATE MUNIANJANAPPA
R/AT NO.21
KOTHANUR POST
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONERS
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M S BUILDING
DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
PALACE ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-506 020
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-III

PALACE ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-506 020
…RESPONDENTS

427

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-K IN SO FAR AS
IN W.P.NO.11782/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. M. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
2. M. SHIVASHANKAR
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
3. NARASIMHAIAH
S/O LATE DODDAHANUMANTHAPPA
4. KRISHNA MURTHY
S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHAPPA
5. ANJANAPPA
6. RAVI KUMAR
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.18

1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS
S.K. GARDEN, BENSON TOWN
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SUNDARESH H. C., ADVOCATE)
428
AND:

M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH
ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST

KUMARAPARK WEST
…RESPONDENTS

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE
THAT THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY BEARING SY NO.1/2
MEASURING 8 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, PURSUANT TO
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX-B AND C ISSUED BY
R-2 AND R-1 RESPECTIVELY SO FOR AS IT RELATES TO
PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERN HAS BEEN LAPSED
UNDER SEC.24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND
TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATIONS AND
RESETTLEMENT ACT.
429
IN W.P.NO.12547/2017:
BETWEEN:
MR. HANUMAIAH
S/O LATE MUISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.2/2, JAKKUR LAKE ROAD
JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE - 560 064.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPARTMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 1
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON

KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE -560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

ENDORSEMENT DATED: 27.01.2017 ISSUED BY R-3 AT ANNEX-L
AND TO DECLARE THAT THE SAID LAND FALLS WITHIN THE
PARAMETER 2 AND 6 OF THE BANDU RAMASWAMY CASE AND
CONSEQUENTLY, QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED:
18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J ISSUED BY R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE
PETITIONER'S ABOVE SAID LAND AND ETC.
430
IN W.P.NO.13456/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. S.N. GAYATHRI DEVI

W/O SHRI. K.S. RANGANATH
AGED ABOUT 50 YE ARS
R/AT SNS HOUSE, NO.1076
2ND FLOOR, 23RD MAIN ROAD
11TH CROSS, HSR LAYOUT
IST SECTOR, BENGALURU - 560 102.
..PETITIONER
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT
5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST

KUMARA PARK WEST

M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
431
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO
APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE
DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX
COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7
SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE
PETITIONERS DATED:16.02.2013 AND 05.09.2013 AS ANNEX-P &
Q RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY.
IN W.P.NO.14238/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. B. DRAKSHAYANI
W/O G.S. THAMMAIAH GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
NO.61,1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS
GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA
POST, BANGALORE - 560 077.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPRESENTED BY
ITS COMMISSIONER.

…RESPONDENTS
432

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE
THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE
SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY. NO.31,
GEDDAKAGAKKU VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
NOTIFICATION DATED:18.06.2014 ISSUE BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-J
AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW.
IN W.P.NO.14626/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. FRANCIS
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
S/O CHINNAPPA
NO.45, 2ND MAIN ROAD
8TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI
...PETITIONER
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

ACQUISITION OFFICER
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. AJAYKUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
433

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT
THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE
SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-L) IS ILLEGAL,
IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW.
IN W.P.NO.14627/2017:
BETWEEN:
DR. G. DEVAN
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
SON OF LATE L. GOVINDARAJ
NO.4221, "DIYA" 11TH MAIN
3RD CROSS, J BLOCK
KANAKADASANAGAR,
MYSORE - 570 022.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.
ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

ACQUISITION OFFICER
SRI. AJAYKUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
434

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL,
IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED BY R-1.
IN W.P.NO.14628/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. GEORGE. C
S/O CHOWRI RAJ
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
NO.92, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS
GEDDALAHALLI
...PETITIONER
AND:
KUMARA PARK WEST
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

…RESPONDENTS

SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
435

IN W.P.NO.14629/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O LATE A. DORAISWAMY
NO.55, 13TH MAIN
J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI
...PETITIONER
AND:
ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPRESENTED BYITS
COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISTION

…RESPONDENTS

SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
436

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-G) IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.14630/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN
S/O LATE A. DORAISAMY
NO.55, 13TH MAIN
...PETITIONER
AND:
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

…RESPONDENTS

SRI. M AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
437

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEX-G IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.14631/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
SON OF LATE A. DORAISAMY
NO.55, 13TH MAIN
...PETITIONER
AND:
2. FBANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
KUMARA PARK WEST
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.

AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST0
BANGALORE -560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
438

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEX-G IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.14632/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN
SON OF LATE A. DORAISAMY,
NO.55, 13TH MAIN,
J.C. NAGAR,
KURUBARAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560 086.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. A.M. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
439

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - G IS
IN W.P.NO.14670/2017:
BETWEEN;
SRI D. KARUNAKARAN
S/O LATE A DORAISAMY,
NO.55, 13TH MAIN,
J.C.NAGAR,
KURUBARAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560 086.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

440

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - J IS
IN W.P.NO.14868/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. VARSHA RAGHAVENDRA

W/O SRI RAGHAVENDRA,
R/AT 7022, SHOBA CHRYSAN THEMUM
2. YOGENDRA NAKRE
S/O LATE APPANNA POOJARY,
5TH CROSS, PAI LAYOUT,
OLD MADRAS ROAD,
3. CHALUVARAYA SWAMY R N
S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH R K.,
R/AT NO.140, 2ND MAIN,
5TH BLOCK, 1ST STAGE,
HBR LAYOUT,KALYANAGAR POST
4. D.A. SRINIVAS
441
S/O D.ANANDARAM,
R/AT NO.957, ANJANADRI,
12TH CROSS ROAD, 35TH MAIN ROAD,
1ST PHASE, J.P.NAGAR,
5. KHAMER AHMED CHETTANAI

S/O ABDUL MALIK CHETTANAI,
R/AT NO.308, III B MAIN, KASTURINAGAR,
6. VITTALA SHETTY
S/O BADIYA SHETTY,
R/AT OLD NO.4, NEW NO.18,
LALABAHADUR SASTRY NAGAR,
INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 038.
7. SRIKANTA BABU K.
S/O SRI A KRISHNAIAH SHETTY,
HEALTH DEPARTMENT QUARTERS,
MAGADI ROAD KHB COLONY,
8. C.V. GANAPATHY
W/O LATE C.M.UTAHAIAH,
R/AT NO.G-46, OLD TOWNSHIP,
HAL COLONY, VIMANAPURA POST,
9. K. VENKATACHALAPATHY
S/O K.V.KRISHNAIAHSETTY,
R/AT NO.261, 1ST BLOCK,
RAJAJINAGAR,
10. SMT. ANUSUYADEVI

W/O LATE RAMASUBBAIAH SHETTY,
R/AT NO.281, SUPRABHA,
10TH MAIN, HANUMANTHANAGAR,
442
11. SMT. C.S. LAKSHMI

W/O C. VENKATACHARYULU,
R/AT FLAT NO.201, SAMHITA RESIDENCY,
PAI LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
BENNIGANAHALLI,
12. SMT. L.BABY NANDA

W/O SRI R.R.SHINDE,
R/AT V.B.R./HSR GRAND,
FLAT NO.009, NO.3, OPP GRAND STORES,
RAMAMURTHYNAGAR MAIN ROAD
DODDA BANASWADI,
13. K. SANNA THIPPAIAH

S/O LATE JAMMA GOPAL KAMAIAH,
C/O PALAIAH, R/AT G.867,
10TH CROSS,
CTS HAL COLONY,
MARATHALLI,
...PETITIONERS
AND:

DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

KUMARAPARK WEST,

KUMARAPARK WEST,

443


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - Q
IN W.P.NO.15038/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI RAMADASS G.,

S/O GOVINDASAMY K,
NO.30, IST MAIN,
3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

444

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - H IS
IN W.P.NO.15588/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. YASHODA.G
S/O SRI.K.T.SUBRAMANYA,
R/AT NO.217, 4TH CROSS ROAD,
5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
KHB COLONY,
BANGALORE-560095.
2. SUDHENDRA ROA
S/O LATE PANDURANGA RAO,
R/AT NO.17/2, SRI RENUKA NILAYA,
SLN TEMPLE ROAD,
MUNNE KOLAR, MARATHAHALLI POST,
BANGALORE-560037.
3. SMT Y. SAROJAMMA
W/O Y.SRINIVASACHAR,
R/AT NO.139/3, 8TH CROSS ROAD,
GOVINDARAJANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560040.
4. HANUMAPPA
S/O LATE SANJEEVAIAH,
R/AT NO.1890, AATHMEEYA,
20TH MAIN ROAD, 20TH B CROSS,
M.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR,
BANGALORE-560040.
5. SUNIL M MATHAD
S/O MAHADEV MATHAD,
445
R/AT NO.29, WEST OF CHORD ROAD,

9TH A CROSS, 2ND STAGE,
MAHALAXMIPURAM,
BANGALORE-560086.
6. A. SRINIVAS
S/O LATE A ARMUGAM,
R/AT NO.17, SULTAN G GUNTA ROAD,
M.NO.4TH STREET,
BANGALORE-560051.
7. SRI C. N. NAGARAJ
S/O LATE C.A.NARASHIMAMURTHY,
R/AT NO.724/31, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
D BLOCK, II STAGE,
RAJAJINGAR,
BANGALORE-560010.
8. J. GOVARDHAN
S/O LATE JAYACHIKKANNA REDDY,
R/AT NO.19, CHINMAYA NILAYA,
GREEN MEDOSA LAYOUT,
KEREGUDDARAHALLI,
CHIKKABANAVARA POST,
BANGALORE-560090.
9. SMT. P. SUDHA
W/O PERMANANDA SRINIVAS,
R/AT L-77/3, II FLOOR,
4TH MAIN, L.N.PURAM,
BANGALORE-560021.
10. D. J. JAYARAMA
S/O JAVARAIAH,
R/AT NO.138/A, KIOCL TOWNSHIP,
KAVOOR, MANGALORE-575015,
BANGALORE-560020.
11. YARRAPPA M V
S/O CHINNAVENKATARAYAPPA,
446
R/AT NO.34, GARDEN VILAS,

MARUTHI NAGAR,
NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-560072.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C M NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001.
REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY.

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020,

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-P DATED
18.06.2014, ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.18427/2017:
BETWEEN:
LEONARD D COSTA
S/O LATE. WELLINGTON D'COSTA,
R/O. 16, SAGAR, CHS,
SOUTH STREET, DONA PAULA,
GOA - 403 004. ...PETITIONER

447
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560001
2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER

(ARKAVATHI LAYOUT),
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJARAM S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

REGULARIZE THE SITE NO. 34 NEW HOUSE LIST KHATA NO.
50/34 MEASURING 50X80 SITUATED AT THANISANDRA, K.R.
PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE
PETITIONER BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND IF IN
CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE
GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONER WITHIN
IN W.P.NO.21361/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. D. P. SOMAIAH
S/O D K PONNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO.247,1ST 'E' MAIN
SHIVANAGAR,RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 010
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. T. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE )
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020
448

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

EXECUTE THE ABSOLUTE SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE
PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF SITE BEARING NO. 117, SITUATED
AT ARKAVATI LAYOUT, BLOCK -VII, BANGALORE, MEASURING
9X12 METERS AND COMPLETE THE PROCESS OF REGISTRATION
FORTHWITH AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.24061/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. S. ROY MATHEW

S/O DR. JOHN MATHEW
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
NO.84, IST MAIN
3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

449
KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE [ANNEXURE - H] IS
IN W.P.NO.24065/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI S. ROY MATHEW

S/O DR. JOHN MATHEW
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
NO.84, IST MAIN
3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

450

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.24506/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI SHIVALINGIAH H. G
SON OF LATE GANGAIAH
NO.18, 2ND MAIN 3RD CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI
K.NARAYANA POST
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
451

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - J IS
IN W.P.NO.24508/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. R. HOMBEGOWDA
SON OF RAMAIAH
NO.13 B, 1ST MAIN
K.NARAYANA POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V)
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
452

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE,
IN W.P.NO.24509/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT KAVITHA SOMASUNDARAM

WIFE OF SOMASUNDARAM
AGED 45 YEARS,
NO.29, 1ST MAIN
K.NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
453
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

IN W.P.NO.25120/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. LINGANNA
SON OF SRI PACHALINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 34,
2 B CROSS ROAD
NEAR VIDYAPEETA CIRCLE
BANK COLONY
TYAGARAJANAGARA
BANGALORE - 560028
...PETITIONER
AND:

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE - 560020
454
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY - 3

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS ON
THE FILE OF R-1 IN THE MATTER OF ALLOTMENT AND
EXECUTION OF SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE BEARING NO.
RH-ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, BLOCK NO.11, AS PER CORRECT
DIMENSION REPORT DATED 25.02.2016 VIDE ANNEX - L AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.26455/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. GEETHA BAI

W/O. SHRI R. SHIVAJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/AT NO.240/6
12 D. T. EXTENSION
K. G. NAGAR
BENGALURU-560 019
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT
5TH FLOOR
M. S. BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
455
KUMAR PARK WEST

BENGALURU-560 020

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE
PETITIONER AS ANNX-N & P RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED
THROUGH HIS SOCIETY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.26456/2017:
BETWEEN:
DR P. CHANDRA SHEKAR REDDY

S/O LATE P. SANNABASAPPA
R/AT NO. 141, UPSTAIRS
2ND MAIN, AGS COLONY,
ANAND NAGAR,
...PETITIONER
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
456
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID
REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEX-K AND L
RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.26457/2017:
BETWEEN:
SHRI C. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA
R/AT NO.38, RACHENAHALLI,
DR. SHIVARAM NAGAR POST
...PETITIONER
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
457
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
4. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REP BY UNDER SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R4;

SCC 129 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.26458/2017:
BETWEEN
SHRI C. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA
R/AT NO. 38, RACHENAHALLI,
DR. SHIVARAM NAGAR POST
...PETITIONER
AND:

REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
458
BENGALURU - 560 001

2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
…RESPONDENTS

RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID
REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.28359/2017:
BETWEEN:
SANJAY KUMAR
S/O S. P. GOEL
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
RESIDENT OF FLAT NO.803
TOWER 3, BESTECH PARKVIEW RESIDENCY
SECTOR 66, MOHALI
PUNJAB-160062
...PETITIONER
AND:

459
KUMARA PARK WEST

BANGALORE-560001

(ARKAVATHY LAYOUT)
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

REGULARIZE THE SITE NO.89, HOUSE LIST KHATA NO. 141/89
MEASURING 30X40 SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLY VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF
THE PETITIONER BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND
IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT OT REGULARIZE
GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONER WITHIN
IN W.P.NO.30485/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. N. ASHOK
S/O. LATE. P. S. NARAYANASWAMY,
R/AT NO. 197,
7TH MAIN ROAD,
SRINIVASA NAGAR,
BSK 1ST STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560050
2. B. R. GOVINDA RAJU
S/O. LATE. B K RAMA RAJU,
R/AT NO. 282,
SAPTHAGIRI,
3RD-A-MAIN A-BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU 560095
3. MOHAMMED MUNIRUDDIN
460
S/O.MOHAMMED HISAMUDDIN,
R/AT NO. 2-1-40/1,
BESIDE JAIL ANDOROON,
QILA RAICHUR,
RAICHUR- 584101
4. K. KUMARASWAMY
S/O. K. KUPPASWAMY,
R/AT NO. 1,
DICKENSON ROAD,
BENGALURU 560042
5. KANDAGAL B. A.
S/O. AMIRABI,
R/AT NO. 5,
9, KARNATAKA BATTALION,
NCC, MARKETED BUILDING,
CUNNINGHAM ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560052
6. V. SIVASANKARAN
S/O. LATE. P. VELAYUDHAN,
R/AT NO. 74,
RANDAPPA COLONY,
BYAPPANAHALLI EXTN,
INDIRANAGAR POST,
BANGALORE - 560038
7. SRI. C A ANJANEYALU
S/O. LATE. C ADINARAYAN,
R/AT NO. 6, D V APPARAO LAYOUT,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
BENGALURU- 560016
8. M. T. DHEERENDRACHAR
S/O. M. TRIVIKARAMACHAR,
R/AT NO. 313,2ND-A-CROSS,
1ST PHASE ,GIRINAGAR,
VHB COMPLEX,
BENGALURU - 560085
461
9. P. RAJASHEKARAN NAIR
S/O. N. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI,
6TH CROSS, 6TH MN,
DOMLURU LAYOUT,
BENGALURU- 560071
10. A. M. MUDDAHANUMAIAH
S/O. MUDDAHANUMAIAH,
R/AT NO. 352,
2ND CROSS,2ND PHASE,
PEENYA,RAJAGOPAL NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560058
11. P. S. SHANMUGAPPA
S/O. LATE. P. SHIVANNA,
R/AT NO. 9,
MANUVANA,
VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560010
...PETITIONERS
AND:

M.S. BUIDLING,
DR. ABMEDKAR VEEDHI,
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY

KUMARAPARK WEST,
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER

THE BANGALORE DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE- 560020.
4. SMT. JAYAMMA
W/O. LATE MUNEGOWDA
462
MAJOR IN AGE
RESIDING AT SREERAMPURA VILLAGE
JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU - 560 064
5. SMT. ERAMMA,
W/O BUDDANNA
MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT
SREERAMAPURA VILLAGE
BENGALURU - 560 064
6. GOVINDAPPA,
S/O. BUDDANNA
BENGALURU - 560 064
7. LAXMAMMA
W/O. NAGAPPA
BENGALURU - 560 064
8. GUNDAPPA N,
S/O. NANJAPPA REDDY
SREERAMAPURAM
BENGALURU - 560 064
…RESPONDENTS
SMT. JAYAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SMT. ERAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R5;
SRI. GOVINDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R6;
SMT. LAXMAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R7)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEX-P
463
IN W.P.NO.31268/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. K. SUDHA
D/O. K. NAGESHWARA RAO,
R/AT NO. 107,
SHANTHIBAGH APARTMENTS,
BEGUMPET,
HYDERABAD-16.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 003.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 003.
…RESPONDENTS


NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND
MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND
MARKED AS ANNEXURE -D ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF
THE SITE BEARING NO.5 ASSESSMENT NO. 46/2 KHATHA NO.
621 MEASURING EAST TO WEST 75 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH
464
40 FEET COMPRISING OF HOUSE AND REVENUE SITE BEARING

NO.6 ASSESSMENT NO. 46/2 KHATA NO.621 MEASURING EAST
TO WEST 75 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH 40' FEET COMPRISING
OF HOUSE BOTH THE SITES ARE FORMED IN SY. NO. 46/2
SITUATED AT AMRUTAHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BENGALUR NORTH TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.33191/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. B. L. RAMAPPA
S/O. LINGAPPA,
NO.3/132, MANAVARTHI GARDEN,
MASJID ROAD,
YELAHANKA,
BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAMESH K. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:

REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRTARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. GOPAL V. BILAMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

ENDORSEMENT DATED 23.08.2016 AT ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY
THE R-2 AND ETC.
465
IN W.P.NO.35344/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR
S/O LATE SHANKARACHAR,
SINCE DEAD BY LR'S
1(a). C. GOWRAMMA
W/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR
AGED 55 YEARS
1(b). SRIDHAR. C
S/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR
AGED 34 YEARS
1(c). BHAGYAJOTHI
D/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR
AGED 31 YEARS
1(d). GIRISH.C
S/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR
AGED 27 YEARS
ALL ARE R/O 43, RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE

BANGALORE - 560 077
2. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O LATE SHANKARACHAR,
RESIDING AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,

DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST,
BENGALURU-560 077
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. M.R. SESHADRI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE
VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 20.03.2018)
AND:

HOUSING AND URBAN
466
VIKAS SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 020

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
KANDAYA BHAVANA,
K.G. ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 009
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE
RECORDS FROM THE R-2 BDA PERTAINING TO THE
PROCEEDINGS OF LAND ACQUISITION IN CASE NO. R173/2003-
04 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.91 OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE (EAST) AT ANNEX - G AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.37044/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI.D.V.ARUNACHALAIAH
S/O LATE D VENKATASUBBARAO
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT 3RD FLOOR,
MARALU RAJANNA BUILDING
MARASANDRA MAIN ROAD,
NEAR CORPORATION BANK
HAROHALLI
KANAKAPURA TALUK-562 112
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADEESH D. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
467

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST
BENGALURU-560020

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SMT. M. V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

ALLOT THE SITE MEASURING 30X40 FEET TO THE PETITIONER
IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT ITSELF AS HE HAS MADE SEVEN
ATTEMPTS AS PER THE UNOFFICIAL NOTE DATED 30.12.2011
ISSUE DBY CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, BDA VIDE ANNEX - F
AND THE SUBSEQUENT ENDORSEMENT DATED 17.04.2012,
DATED 27.06.2012 AND 18.02.2013 VIDE ANNEX-J, H AND K
RESPECTIVELY FORTHWITH.
IN W.P.NO.40596/2017:
BETWEEN:
K. N. VENKATESHA MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O LATE K.V.NARAYANAPPA,
R/AT NO.851/A, 17TH G MAIN,
5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 010.
...PETITIONER
AND:

M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001
468

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR,AGA FOR R1;
SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2;

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE, THAT THE
ACQUISITION NOTIFICATIONS DATED 03.02.2003, ISSUED
UNDER SECTION 17(1) OF THE BDA ACT, 1976 AT ANNEX-B, BY
THE R-2 FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED UNDER
SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT AT ANNEX - C AND MODIFIED
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNX -G ISSUED BY
THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED, ARE LAPSED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.42836/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. P. SHAKUNTALA
W/O DR P CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY,
R/AT NO.17, IST FLOOR,
UAS, GK VK LAYOUT,
2ND CROSS, JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001
469

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. G.A. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 23.02.2204 AS PER ANNEXURE - J ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN
RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE
LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF
RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND
ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013
[ CENTRAL ACT 30/2013] AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN
VIEW OF THE DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF THE
NEW ACT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.43194/2017:
BETWEEN
SRIRAMA REDDY
S/O LATE KEMPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/AT NO.619, SRI CHOWDESHWARY NILAYA,
8TH CROSS, NEAR SAPPALAMMA TEMPLE,
JAYANAGARA,
KOLAR-563101
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HEGDE V.S., ADVOCATE)
470
AND:

REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER,
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
2. THE SECRETARY
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJA H. T., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 )

RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED
03.05.2017 VIDE ANNEX - F AND F1 AND TO ALLOT THE
SITE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER ADJACENT TO THE
EARLIER ALLOTED SITE IN THE VERY SAME AREA AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.43207/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI VENKATESH PRABHU

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O KEMPAHANUMAIAH
NO 396, 5TH MAIN,
3RD STAGE, 3RD BLOCK,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR
WEST OF CHORD ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560079
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. YASHAS B. L., ADVOCATE)
AND:

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU - 560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY

471
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU - 560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE BDA TO
CONVEY THE SITE BEARING NO. 16 MEASURING 15 X 24
METERS IN BLOCK VI OF THE ARKAVATHY LAYOUT FORTHWITH
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.45953/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. A. DORISWAMY
S/O LATE ARMUGAM
GANGAMMA LAYOUT, MAHADEVAPURA
BANGALORE-48
...PETITIONER
AND:
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560 001
REPT BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
4. SRI MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE MUNIUTHAPPA
472

YELHANKA HOBLI
…RESPONDENTS

ENDORSEMENT DATED 12.05.2017 ISSUED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT REJECTING THE CLAIM OF THE PETITIONER
CONTENDING THAT VENDOR OF THE PETITIONER I.E. SRI
MUNIYAPPA S/O. MUNIUTHAPPA, 4TH RESPONDENT HAS BEEN
ALLOTTED THE ALTERNATIVE SITES UNDER 40:60 RATION
WHICH IS NOT PERMISSIBLE UNDER LAW IN RESPECT OF SITE
BEARING NO.6 IN SY.NO. 48/5 SITUATED AT AMRUTHAHALLI,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK VIDE ANNX - A
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.46333/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. UMA VARMA

AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
W/O G.GODAVARMA RAJA,
NO.32, PROMENADE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 005
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S.BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
473

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT
DATED 07.04.2017 ISSUED BY R-2 AS WELL AS THE
PROCEEDINGS OF R-2 DATED 29.12.2016 IN SUBJECT NO.
141/2016 AT ANNEX -L1 TO W.P. (II) QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AT ANNEXURE -G SO FAR IT
PERTAINS TO SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -F IN RESPECT OF
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVING REGARD TO THE
DIRECTIONS GIVEN BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE
COURT IN THE CASE OF COMMISSIONER B.D.A. VS STATE OF
KARNATAKA REPORTED IN ILP 2006 KAR 318 AND BONDU
RAMASWAMY AND OTHER VS STATE OF KARNATAKA.
IN W.P.NO.46766/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. BASAVARAJU C. A.
S/O. LATE PATEL ANNEGOWDA,
R/AT NO. 965, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
BSK 3RD STAGE,
KALIDASANAGAR,
HOSKEREHALLI,
BENGALURU-560 085.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAIK N. R., ADVOCATE)
474
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU-560 002.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE)

RESPONDENT'S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THE REGISTERED
SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO. BK-17,
MEASURING 6.00 X 9.00 METERS, FORMED IN SY.NO. 22,
BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, 18TH BLOCK, ARKAVATHI EXTENSION
BENGALURU AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47823/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. APPANNA GOWDA

S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA
RESIDING AT K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE,
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560004
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
475

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE -560004. …RESPONDENTS

SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47854/2017:
BETWEEN:
RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
S/O LATE MUNIANJINAPPA
RESIDING AT K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560004
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE -560004
…RESPONDENTS
476

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.49031/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. MANJEGOWDA
S/O LATE JAVARAPPA,
AGED 68 YEARS
R/AT NO.417, 13TH MAIN ROAD,
M.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 040.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. S. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISIONER
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
2. THE SECRETARY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY -III

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-IV,

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPAL V. BILALMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)
477

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT TO
COMPLETE THE REMAINING PROCESS I.E., TO ISSUE
POSSESSION CERTIFICATE AND ALSO TO EXECUTE THE
REGISITERED LEASE CUM SALE AGREEMENT IN FAVOUR OF
THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO. 1043,
BLOCK VIII, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BANGALORE BASSED ON THE
ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 10.04.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J TO W.P.
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.50540/2017:
BETWEEN;
1. SETHUMADHAVAN
S/O A.P.V NAIR,
AGE: 75 YEARS,
R/AT NO 59,
ARADHANA,
AECS LAYOUT SANJAYANAGAR ,
BENGALURU - 560094
2. C. REKHA JETTY
D/O K S CHANDRAN
AGE:51 YEARS
R/AT NO 22, 5TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN,
AGS LAYOUT, NEW BEL ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560054
3. SANTHOSH KUMAR V. K
S/O LATE A. C. B. NAIR
AGE 54 YEARS
R/AT NO 25,
5TH CROSS,
GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT,
THANISANDRA
BENGALURU - 560077
4. C R JANARDHANAN
S/O LATE T P RAMAN NAIR,
AGE:73 YEARS
R/AT NO 12,
3RD CROSS,
GOLDEN RETREAT,
478
NEAR TELECOM LAYOUT,

ASHWATHNAGAR BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU
5. PREM KUMAR
S/O LATE P. SHIVASHANKARAN
AGE: 46 YEARS
R/AT NO 26, ADEEP 5TH CROSS,
THANISANDRA
BENGALURU - 560077
6. USHA HUSSAIN
W/O ARSHAD HUSSAIN,
AGE 48 YEARS,
R/AT NO 7104,
SOBHA CHRYSANTHEMU,
BENGALURU - 560077
7. P. R. SUBRAMANIAN
S/O P. R. RAMAMURTHY
AGE:58 YEARS
R/AT NO 10, 3RD CROSS,
GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT THANISANDRA
BENGALURU - 560077
8. S. PRAVEEN KUMAR
S/O B. SHIVAJI RAO,
AGE:43 YEARS
R/AT NO 4,
ASHWATHNAGAR,
THANISANDRA
BENGALURU - 560077
9. AJAY KUMAR
S/O LATE K. N. SINGH
AGE: 58 YEARS
R/AT NO 22,
GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT
ASHWATHNAGAR,
THANISANDRA
BENGALURU - 560077
479
10. VEENA THANGAMANI

W/O NITHYNANDAN
ANDIAPPA NAGERCOIL
AGE:42 YEARS
R/AT NO 182, RAMGOPAL LAYOUT
SUBBANNA PALYAM
BANASWADI MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE- 560043
11. VIJAYAKUMAR NAIK

S/O LATE K K NAIR,
AGE: 58 YEARS
R/AT NO 24,
5TH CROSS,
ASHWATHNAGAR
THANISANDRA
BENGALURU - 560077
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MOHAMAD AYUB ALI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRTARY
TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGLAORE - 560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE - 560020

BANGALORE DISTRICT
REVENUE BHAVAN
K. G. ROAD,
BANGALORE- 560009
…RESPONDENTS


480
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNX - H ISSUED BY

THE R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE
ANNEX-G AND ALSO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
VIDE ANNX-N ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO
SITE NOS. 2,3,5,25,12,26,14/A,10,4,22,17 AND 24 BELONGING
TO THE PETITIONERS FORMED IN SY.NO.12/4 OF THANISANDRA
VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.53428/2017:
BETWEEN:
SHADRACH
S/O PETRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
R/AT NO 25,
LAXMIPATHY LAYOUT
KARIYANNAPALYA
BEHIND SPEECH AND
HEARING INSTITUTE
ST. THOMAS TOWN POST
BENGALURU - 560084
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR K., ADVOCATE)
AND:

DEPT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU - 560001

DR T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU - 560020

DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
481
KUMARA PARK WEST

BENGALURU - 560020. …RESPONDENTS
SRI. G.A. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PASSED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D
INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED BEARING
SY.NO.30/4 TO AN EXTENT OF 0.22 GUNTAS OF LAND NOTIFIED
FOR THE ACQUISITION IN THE YEAR 2004 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.54064/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. GEORGE K SAMUEL
S/O LATE K A SAMUEL,
R/AT KUTTIKATTU,
NEDUMPARAMBU,
PATHANAPURAM POST,
KOLLAM DISTRICT,
KERALA
REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER,
SRI BIJU THOMAS PAREL,
S/O P M THOMAS,
NO.1, PAREL HOUSE,
JYOTHINAGAR, IST CROSS,
HORAMAVU AGARA,
BENGALURU-560043
2. SRI MULLUMKATTI MATHE THOMAS

S/O M.T. MATHEW,
R/AT MULLUMKATTIL,
EBENEZER, ANGADI P.O.,
RANNY, KERALA-689674
REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER,
P.P PAULSON S/O P.U.PAULSON,
R/AT NO.12, NEW MILLENEUM STREET,
HORAMAVU, AGARA,
BENGALURU-560043. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NAGARAJAPPA A., ADVOCATE)

482
AND:

CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P (WEST)
BENGALURU-560020
2. THE ADDL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P (WEST)
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

STRICTLY ADHERE AND FOLLOW CONDITIONS STIPULATED IN
TERMS OF BANDU RAMASWAMY V/S BDA REPORTED IN 2010 (7)
SCC PAGE 129 IN REPECT OF SY.NO.46/1 OF AMRUTHA HALLI
VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
FORMED ON 0.24 GUNTAS OUT OF 2 ACTES 24 GUNTAS
ACQUIRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, AND
DROP THE ACTION INITIATED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.54863/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. MR. CHEMBRATH VENUGOPAL

S/O SRI.C.V. ACHUTHAN,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.605
A-2 MALLAPRABHA BLOCK
NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE,
KORAMANGALA,
BANGALORE-560047
2. MRS. REMADEVI VENUGOPAL

W/O CHEMBRATH VENUGOPAL,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.605
A-2 MALLAPRABHA BLOCK
NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE,
KORAMANGALA,
(BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)

483
AND:

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-20

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-20
3. STATE OF KARANTAKA
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;

MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND TO DIRECT THEM
TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30 X 40 IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN
ANY LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONERS
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55316/2017:
BETWEEN:
MR. SHYAM MOHAN GARG

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
S/O VISHWAMBHAR NATH GARG,
NO.18, BRIJ NAGAR, MATHURA,
UTTARPRADESH-281 001
TODAY AT BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER

484
AND:

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOWTHAM DEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;

TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30' X 40' IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN
AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONER
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55317/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. MRS. KOKIL GARG

D/O. JAMUNA PRASAD AGARWAL,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
NO.18, BRIJ NAGAR, MATHURA,
UTTARPRADESH-281001
TODAY AT BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER
485
AND:

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3)

TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30' X 40' IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN
AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONER
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56035/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. K. MUNISHAMMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA
NO.475, 11TH CROSS,
6TH MAIN ROAD,
SADASHIVANAGAR
BENGALURU-560080
...PETITIONER
486
AND:

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK EAST
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. M V ADITHI, ADVOCATE)

RESPONDENT TO ALLOT ALTERNATIVE SITE MEASURING 15
METERS TO 24 METERS IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR SIMILARLY
DEVELOPED LAYOUT TO THE PETITIONER WITHOUT INSISTING
FOR PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OR EXTRA AMOUNT
TOWARDS THE SITAL VALUE AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.3157/2018:
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. A. SYED NISAR AHMED

AGED 59 YEARS,
S/O LATE SYED AMEER SAB
R/O NO.DA-57
KHB QUARTERS,
KAVAL BYRASANDRA SULTHANPALYA
R. T. NAGAR POST
BENGALURU-560 032
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE )
AND:

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST
BENGALURU-560020
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-III

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
K P WEST
BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPAL BILALMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2)

487

RESPONDENTS TO EXECUTE THE REGULAR SALE DEED IN
FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SITE ALLOTTED
TO HIM VIZ., SITE NO. 376/A, BLOCK - V, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT,
BENGALURU, MEASURING 9 X 12 METERS IN PURSUANCE OF
THE LEASE - CUM- SALE AGREEMENT DATED 30.06.2006 AS
PER ANNEXURE - B EXECUTED BY R-2 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.3523/2018:
BETWEEN:
ANURADHA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
W/O LATE B R.T. RAJU
NO.8/10, 1ST CROSS, 3RD BLOCK,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE 560020.
...PETITIONER
AND:

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020.
2. LAND ACQUISITION AUTHORITY

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTRHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 )

RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE AT
ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AS PER ORDER DATED 11/03/2014 ISSUED
BY R-2 A COPY OF WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - C AND
ETC.
488
IN W.P.NO.5448/2018:
BETWEEN:
M/S. TRINITY VILLAGE

PLOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION,
R/O TRINITY ENCLAVE ,
HENNUR MAIN ROAD
BANGALORE - 43
M. SRINIVAS
...PETITIONER
AND:
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560001
REPT BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020
...RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 AND R-3 TO
CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION S OF THE PETITIONERS
DATED 14.02.2014 AND 31.01.2018 GIVEN FOR DELETION OF
HOUSE SITES FROM THE ACQUISITION IN RESPECT OF
SCHEDULE PROPERTIES SITUATED AT K. NARAYANAPURA
VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, VIDE
ANNEX-A AND B RESPECTIVELY, AS PER THE ORDER DATED
24.01.2014 PASSED IN W.P. 32120-21/2013 AND 32371-
32376/2013 AND 3481-3558/2014 (LA-BDA) VIDE ANNEX-D AND
489
ALSO AS PER THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME

COURT OF INDIA IN THE CASE OF BONDURAMASWAMY AND
OTHERS VS. BDA AND OTHERS (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8731/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI H. M. KUMAR
S/O SRI HANUMANTHAPPA,
R/AT NO.2244,
9TH MAIN ROAD, "E" BLOCK,
2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560010
2. SRI. M. HUCHE GOWDA

S/O. LATE MARE GOWDA,
R/AT NO.322,
19TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE,
BEML LAYOUT,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560079
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE )
AND:

HAVING OFFICE AT T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020

HAVING OFFICE AT
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020
3. THE BEML EMPLOYEE'S CO OPERATIVE

SOCIETY LIMITED
REGD NO.ARB-2/F/PR-45/1983/71-72/
490
ARB-2/AUD/196/80-81,
CARE OF BHARAT EARTH MOVERS LIMITED,
B.E.M.L COMPLEX,
NEW THIPPASANDRA POST,
BENGALURU-560075
4. SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA

S/O LATE M. NARAYANA GOWDA,
5. SMT. N. USHA GOPALA GOWDA

W/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA,
6. KUM. SHARANYA
D/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA,
7. KUM YOGITHA
8. KUM VARSHITHA
SINCE MINOR IN AGE,
REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER
AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA,
THE RESPONDENT NO.4 HEREIN
RESPONDENTS 4 TO 8 ARE
DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR
POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU-560077
9. SRI. T. V. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE T. C. VENKATASWAMAPPA,
BENGALURU-560045
491
10. SRI CHANNAPPA

S/O SRI DYAVAPPA,
11. SMT BHAGYAMMA

W/O SRI CHANNAPPA,
12. SMT. C. KANTHAMMA

D/O SRI CHANNAPPA,
13. SMT C. ANASUYA

D/O SRI CHANNAPPA,
14. SRI C. KUMARA

S/O SRI CHANNAPPA,
15. SRI C. KESHAVA MURTHY

S/O SRI. CHANNAPPA,
16. SRI C. DEVARAJA

S/O SRI. CHANNAPPA,
17. SRI. C. HANUMANTHAPPA

S/O SRI CHANNAPPA,
18. SRI. C. PRADEEP KUMAR

S/O SRI CHANNAPPA,
R/AT SARI PALYA,
THANISANDRA DHAKLE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU-560045
19. SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA

S/O LATE SRI THAMME GOWDA,
492
20. KUM M SHRAVANTHI

D/O SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA,
21. SRI M. HARSHIT GOWDA

S/O SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU-560045
22. SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY

S/O LATE CHIKKA PAPANNA,
23. SMT SHYLAJA

W/O SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY,
24. SRI NAGENDRA

S/O SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY,
25. SRI VIJAYENDRA

S/O SRI T P NARAYANASWAMY,
RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU-560045
26. SRI T P GOVINDAPPA

S/O LATE CHIKKA PAPANNA,
27. SMT GOWRAMMA

W/O SRI T P GOVINDAPPA,
28. SRI NAGESHA

S/O SRI T P GOVINDAPPA,
493
RESPONDENTS 26 TO 28
K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU-560045
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SRI. LOHITSWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. B.E. SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. N.BYRE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R6 TO R17,
R19, R23 TO R25, R27 AND R28;
SMT. USHA GOPALA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 )

DATED 29.06.2007 PASSED BY THE R-2 WHEREIN THE CLAIMS
MADE BY THE SOCIETY AND THE ORIGINAL LAND OWNER IN
RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY NO. 17/8, 21/2, 20/4, 18/1,
18/4, 18/5, 17/10A, 16/10A, 16/11B, 23/1, 23/3, 95/3
SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND GRANT BENEFIT OF THE 40:60
SCHEME TO THE PETITIONERS AS FOUND IN ANNEXURE -V TO
THE W.P. AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.9190/2018:
BETWEEN:
SALETH MARY
57992
W/O. PATRICK PETER,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
#4, 2ND BLOCK,
DASAPPA LAYOUT,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
494
BANGALORE NORTH,
BANGALORE-560 016.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. G. JAVEED AHMED KHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BY ITS URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARY,
MULTI-STORIED BUILDING,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

AUTHORITY,
T. CHOWDAIAH RAOD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R3)

IMPLEMENT THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT
ANNEXURE-C WHILE FORMING THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND
495
ALLOTING THE SAME TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT

INTERFERING WITH THE SITE OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.12221/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI.N.SESHAGIRI RAO
S/O LATE N.S.NAGARAJARAO,
2. SRI RAGHAVENDRA MURTHY

S/O LATE N.S. NAGARAJA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
3. SRI.ANANTHA MURTHY
S/O LATE N.S. NAGARAJA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
ALL THE ABOVE ARE

BANGALORE-560045
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.A. MITHUN, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. G. D. ASWATHANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
496

AUTHORITY,
R.T.NAGAR DIVISION,
BANGALORE -560 039
3. JAI HIND SPORTS ACADEMY

REPRESENTED BY
SRI VENKATASWAMY,
S/O KUMMANNA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
BANGALORE-45
4. DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR
YUVAKA SANGHA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT, SRI.T.RAMESH,
NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-45
5. BHUVANESWARI KANNADA SANGHA

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
SRI.RAVI KUMAR PATEL,
S/O JAYARAM DAS,
NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-45
6. DR.RAJKUMAR ABHIMANIGALA
SANGHA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT,
SRI.RAVI KUMAR PATEL,
S/O JAYARAM DAS,
NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-45
…RESPONDENTS

497

R3 SERVED; R4 SERVED)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER
DATED 06.01.2018 IN O.S.NO. 8856/2012 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED XXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BANGALORE ON I.A. NO.11 VIDE ANNEXURE - A AND ENABLE
THE PLAINTIFFS TO CARRY OUT THE AMENDMENT AS SOUGHT
FOR AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.12792/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. MRS. NIDHYA XAVIER

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
D/O A.M.M.S. XAVIER,
R/O PLOT NO.24,
'ROYAL ENCLAVE ENTENSION',
'KALAKRUTHI AVENUE',
INJAMBAKKAM,
CHENNAI-600 041
REPRESENTED BY HER
GENERAL POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER
MR.LINUS MARIADOSS
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O LATE MR. JOSEPH
VEDANAYAGAM,
R/O NO.44/30, 5TH CROSS,
GRACE TOWN,
HENNUR MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU-560043
THE SECOND PETITIONER HEREIN
2. MR. LINUS MARIADOSS

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O LATE MR. JOSEPH VEDANAYAGAM,
R/O NO.44/30, 5TH CROSS,
GRACE TOWN, HENNUR MAIN ROAD,
498
BENGALURU-560043
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BENGALURU-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-20
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHI KUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY R-2 DATED 03.02.2003 IN TERMS OF
SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY ACT VIDE ANNEX - W AND THE NOTIFICATION
DATED 23.02.2004 IN TERMS OF SEC. 19(1) OF THE ACT IN SO
FAR AS THEY RELATES TO SITE NUMBERS 15, 16 AND 17
CARVED OUT OF LAND IN SY. NO. 5 OF GEDDLAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK VIDE ANNEX - X;
DATED 23.02.2004 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.25302/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. B. CHANDRA SHEKAR HEBBAR

S/O LAKSHMINARAYANA HEBBAR
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/A BIADY VILLAGE
KOTESHWARA POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK
DAKSHINA KANNADA-576222
2. SRI. L. G. SHESHADRI VASAN

499
S/O L. GOVINDA RAO

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1351
"GOVINDA NILAYA", 5TH MAIN
2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGARA
BANGALORE-560010
3. SRI MOHAMMED ZAMEER

S/O KHAJA MAIHUDDIN
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/A NO.118
"MUMTAZ MANIZIL", 4TH MAIN
OPP ADESHWAR ELECTRONICS
GANGANAGARA
BANGALORE - 560 032
4. SMT LEELAVATI R HEGDE

W/O R. G. HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
MARUTHI LAYOUT
DASARAHALLI
BANGALORE - 560 010
5. SRI. CHANDRU M
S/O MUNIANJINAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
3RD MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT
HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE-560024
6. SRI. GOPAL. M
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/A NO.2114, D BLOCK
9TH MAIN, SAHAKARNAGARA
BANGALORE-560092
7. SMT T. R. PADMA MURTHY

W/O T. R. KRISHNA MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
MARUTHI LAYOUT
BHUVANESHWARINAGARA
500
KEMPAPURA DASARAHALLI
BANGALORE-560024
8. SMT. K. KUSUMA GANAPATHY

D/O M. K. MUNNAIAH
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
NO.11, 12TH CROSS
MARUTHI LAYOUT
BHUVANESHWARINAGARA,
KEMPAPURA DASARAHALLI,
BANGALORE-560024
9. SMT. MANGALA PRAKASH

W/O SRI JAYAPRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/A NO.231, V MAIN
6TH PHASE, INDUSTRIAL TOWN
RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE
10. SRI R. MANOHAR

S/O M. R. RAJASHEKARAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
NO.26, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN
VASANTHAPPA BLOCK,
GANGANAGARA
BANGALORE-560032
11. SRI M. K. RAGHAVAN

S/O LATE KUNJAN
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
MARUTHI LAOUT
HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE-560024.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. M. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE )
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001
501
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
4. SRI. B.P. RAJESH

S/O LATE B. R. PANDU RANGA GUPTA
R/A NO.8, GOVINDARAJU STREET
SHESHADRIPURAM
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

SCHEME KNOWN AS " ARKAVATHI LAYOUT" IN RESPECT OF THE
LAND BEARING SY.NO. 78, MEASURING 2 ACRES OF
DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH
TALUK NOW BANGALORE EAST TALUK, AS LAPSED AND TO
GRANT CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF/S THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.26667/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT PILLAMMA
D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA,
W/O LATE A. M. MUNIRAJU,
R/AT NO.412,
NEAR AYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE,
JAKKUR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
BENGALURU DISTRICT.
2. SMT GOWRAMMA
502
W/O MUNIHUCHAPPA,
R/AT BETTENAHALLI,
KUNDANA HOBLI,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
3. TULSAMMA
W/O LAKSHMAIAH GUNI AGRAHARA,
R/AT HESSARAGHATTA HOBLI,
BENGALURU DISTRICT.
4. SRI M. GOPAL
S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA,
R/AT NO.2, GANGAMMA TEMPLE ROAD,
BALAPPA LAYOUT,
AMRUTHAHALLI,
BENGALURU-560092
5. BHAGYAMMA
D/O. LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA,
W/O PILLAPPA,
R/AT HESANAGHATTA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,
BENGALURU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. LEELADHAR H. P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
503
KUMARA PARK,
BELLARY ROAD,
( T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020)

KUMARA PARK,
BELLARY ROAD,
( T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020)
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SPECIAL
GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1
AND 2 UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BENGALURU
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 IN SO FAR AS
PETITIONERS LAND IS CONCERNED IN SL NO. 660 OF THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION UNDER ANNEXURE - A AND QUASH THE
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE
R-1 AND 2 UNDER SECTION 17[1] OF THE BENGALURU
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 IN SO FAR AS
PETITIONERS LAND IS CONCERNED IN SL.NO.112 OF THE
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.27750/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. MR. JAYARAM S.
S/O LATE SUBBAIAH,
2. SMT M KANTHAMANI
W/O. MR.JAYARAM,
3. MR. J. VARUN
S/O MR.JAYARAM,
ALL ARE R/AT MARIAMMA TEMPLE,

OLD POLICE STATION ROAD,
504
KADUGONDANAHALLI A.C.POST,
BANGALORE-560045.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUNITHA H. SINGH, ADVOCATE)
AND:

DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. M.V. THANUJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO
APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE
SCC 129 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.27947/2018:
BETWEEN:
SMT SHARADA S. SHETTY

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
505
W/O LATE A.SADANANDA SHETTY,

R/AT NO.206,
SAHARA GRANDEUR APARTMENT,
AMRUTHANAGAR MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU-560092.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS

RESPONDENT NO.2 TO FORTHWITH ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE
TO THE PETITIONER AS SOUGHT FOR IN ANNEXURE - B AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.30106/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT P. V. MANJULA SRINIVAS

W/O DR. SAKEY SRINIVAS,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT NO.1,TYPE-IV QUARTERS,
IVRI,HEBBAL,
BENGALURU-560 024
506
2. DR. P. V. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O P V RAGHU
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO.32,HMT LAYOUT,
80 FEET ROAD EXTENSION,
BENGALURU-560 032
3. SMT G. RAJINI DEVI

W/O P. V. MOHAN BABU,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT NO.E-11 STREET,
BROADWAY ROAD CROSS,
SHIVAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 051
4. SMT P C NANDA
W/O P R CHANDAR
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT NO.4,"D" 2ND STREET,
BROADWAY ROAD CROSS,
SHIVAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 051
5. SRI V NAGARAJ
S/O LATE P VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.7,2ND FLOOR,
G NO.11TH STREET,
JOGUPALYAM, HALASURU,
BENGALURU-560 008
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE )
AND:
M S BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 020
507

SANKEY ROAD,

SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3
VAKALATH FILED FOR R3 ONLY)

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNX -Y DATED
03.02.2203 IN NOTIFICATION FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY
THE R-1 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
NOTIFICATION AT ANNEX - Y AND Y1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.38977/2018:
BETWEEN
1. ASHWINI DAYAL TAWAKLEY

S/O LATE BISHAN DAYAL TAWAKLEY
2. VINITA TAWAKLEY
W/O ASHWINI DAYAL TAWAKLEY

ETON AVENUE WEMBLEY
MIDDLESEC HAO 3AZ
UNITED KINGDOM.
ALSO AT GATEWAY HOTEL

NO.66 RESIDENCY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONERS
508
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ARKAVATHY LAYOUT
KUMARA PARK WEST
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE FIRST
RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO. 218, HOUSE LIST
KHATHA NO. 28/218. MEASURING 70 X 65 FEET SITUATED AT
RACHENAHALLY VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE
SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS BY
COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF IN CASE THERE IS
ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE
SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.39615/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. S. KRISHNAMURTHY
SON OF LATE SHESHACHAR,
RESIDING AT 4/14,
QUARTERS IVRI, HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-560 024.
2. SRI. K. T. RAMESHKUMAR
SON OF LATE SRI. A. K. THIRUVENGADAM,
RESIDING AT NO. 412,
GROUND FLOOR,
6TH MAIN, 4TH "D" CROSS,
HRBR LAYOUT,
509
2ND BLOCK, KALYANANAGAR,

BANGALORE-560 043.
3. K. T. GEETHA SAMPATHKUMARI
D/O. LATE A. K. THIRUVENGADAM,
"MALATHI NILAYAM",
7TH "B" MAIN, 1ST BLOCK,
HRBR LAYOUT,
KALYANNAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 043.
4. SRI. C. SHIVAMADAV
SON OF C. SHANKARRAJU,
RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYAPALLI
VILLAGE AND POST,
KODUR (RS),
CUDDAPH DISTRICT, A.P.
PIN: 516 101.
5. SRI. K. RADHAKRISHNAN
SON OF LATE SRI. C. BHASKARAN NAIR,
RESIDING AT NO. 3/1,
IVRI CAMPUS,
HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-560 024.
6. SRI. N. JAIRAJ
SON OF LATE V. NARAYANA SWAMY,
7TH MAIN, PILLANNA GARDEN,
3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 045.
7. SMT. SUJATHA
WIFE OF M. SUBRAMANYAM,
RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYPALLI,
VILLAGE AND POST,
KODUR (RS),
CUDDAPH DISTRICT,
510
A.P.,
PIN-516 101.
8. SRI. GOLLA RAMALINGA REDDY

SON OF GOLLA PITCHI REDDY,
RESIDING AT IVRI CAMPUS,
HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-560 024.
9. SMT. V. RAMA
WIFE OF DR. V. V. SURYANARAYAN,
HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-560 024.
10. MR. MATHEW P. THOMAS

SON OF LATE REV. FR. P.C. THOMAS,
RESIDING AT NO.31, "THANALI",
2ND CROSS, 3RD BLOCK,
DASAPPA LAYOUT,
RAMAMURTHYNAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 016.
11. SMT. DEEPA MATHUR

WIFE OF A. M. MATHUR,
HEBBAL,
BANGALORE-560 024.
12. DR. SATHYANARAYANA SAHA

SON OF LATE MR. SHARATCHANDRA SAHA,
RESIDING AT N.5, "SHARATH",
4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
PAMPA EXTENSION,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA,
BANGALORE-560 024.
13. SMT. S. MALATHI

WIFE OF SRI. T. SANNATH KUMAR,
511
"MALATHI NILAYAM",
7TH "B" MAIN,
HRBR LAYOUT, 2ND BLOCK,
KALYANANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 043.
14. SMT. SAMBARU KRISHNAVENI

WIFE OF DR. K. GANESH,
RESIDING AT NO. 27,
GANESH NILAYA, 11TH CROSS,
GANGANAGARA NORTH,
BANGALORE-560 024.
15. SMT. LEELAVATHI

WIFE OF SRI. S. R. NAGARAJU,
RESIDING AT NO. 27,
24TH "A" CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR,
1ST MAIN, YELAHANKA,
BANGALORE-560 064.
16. SMT. C. SUSHEELA

WIFE OF SHANKAR RAJU,
RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYPALLI
VILLAGE AND POST,
KODUR (RS)
CUDDAPH DISTRICT,
A.P. PIN: 516 101. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE SECRETARY
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
512

SANKEY ROAD,


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE GAZETTE
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE -T
AND ANOTHER NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS AT
ANNEXURE - S AND T AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.48266/2018:
BETWEEN:
SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY
S/O NARAYANAPPA,
R/AT SAMPIGE HALLI,
JAKKUR POST,
YELAHANKA,
BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONER
AND:

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN
DEVELOPMENT,M S BUILDING,
BENGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE- 560 001
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 001
513
…RESPONDENTS
SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY,SR.COUNSEL FOR

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS PER ANNEXURE - H TO THE W.P. IN RESPECT OF
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.53051/2018:
BETWEEN:
SRI R. M. GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH,
R/AT NO.925/A, 3RD B CROSS,
H.R.B.R. I BLOCK,
KALYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043.
...PETITIONER
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001
REP BY ITS SECRETARY.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SMT. VANAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
514

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -D
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF
THIS HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A
POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-D AND THEN TO DECLARE THAT,
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION, DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEXURES - E & F
CEASES TO EXIST AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.53250/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI JOSEPH M MARIRAJ

S/O MARIRAJ
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
2. SMT SUJATHA MARIRAJ

W/O JOSEPH MARIRAJ
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/O D NO.49

ROBERSON ROAD
FRAIZER TOWN
BENGALURU-560 005
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH., ADVOCATE)
AND:

M S BUILDING
DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560 001

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020

515

T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. DILDAR SHIRALLI, HCGP FOR R1;

NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY
FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO. 83/1 HENNUR VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, DATED 03.02.2003
PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN PAGES
155-164, AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND H ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN
LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SEC.24[2] OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR
COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION,
REHABILITIATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56686/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SHAHEEN FATHIMA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
W/O MR MOHAMMED YOUSUFF
RESIDING AT NO.5/1
STEPHENS ROAD
FRAZER TOWN
BANGALORE-560 005
REPRESENTED BY HER
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SRI. B. M. MADAPPA
2. MRS NAGEENA BEGUM

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
W/O MR AMMANULLAH KHAN
R/AT NO.8
AHMED SET ROAD
FRAZER TOWN
BANGALORE-560 005
REPRESENTED BY HER
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SRI B. M. MADAPPA
516
3. MR. FIYAZ AHMED

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB
R/AT NO.40/2
STANDAGE ROAD
FRAZER TOWN
BANGALORE-560 005
REPRESENTED BY HER
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SRI B. M. MADAPPA
4. MR. SANAULLAH KHAN

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O RASHEEDULLAH KHAN
R/AT 8 AHMED SET ROAD
FRAZER TOWN
BANGALORE-560 005
REPRESENTED BY HER
POWER OF ATTORNEY
SRI B. M. MADAPPA
...PETITIONERS
AND:

M. S. BUILDING
B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
517

NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - M IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS
AND THEIR SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2939/2019:
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH THOMAS
S/O. THOMAS POTHAN,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
"THOPPIL KANDATHIL",
10TH KILOMETER STONE,
HENNUR MAIN ROAD,
KALYANNAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 043.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUVARNA M.L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT.,
HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
518

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT
DATED 28.09.2018 (UNDER ANNEXURE -J TO THE WRIT
PETITION) ISSUED BY THE R-3 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS
TO DE-NOTIFY/DROP FROM ACQUISITION LAND BEARING
SY.NO.10 OF GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK MEASURING 4.04 GUNTAS OWNED BY
THE PETITIONER AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8325/2019:
BETWEEN:
NOREEN AHMED
D/O.AMEER AHAMED,
R/O.12, 6TH CROSS, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION,
BENGALURU.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S.BUILDING,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS

SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
519

FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.83/1, HENNUR VILLAGE,
PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE PM 03.02.2003 IN PAGES
155-164 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE -J AND L ISSUED BY R2 AND R1
RESPECTIVELY ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY
VIRTUE OF SEC. 24[2] OF THE RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION
AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION
AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8329/2019:
BETWEEN:
NAVEEN ALEEM
W/O ABDUL ALEEM
R/O 12, 6TH CROSS, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION
BENGALURU. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:

M.S.BUILDING,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUAMRA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
520
KUMARA PARK WEST


SMT. M.R. VANAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;

FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.83/1, HENNUR VILLAGE,
PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE PM 3/2/2003 IN PAGES
155-164 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND J ISSUED BY R2 AND R1
RESPECTIVELY ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY
VIRTUE OF SEC. 24[2] OF THE RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION
AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.12093/2019:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. DHAKSHAYINI
W/O LATE S.G. SIKHARANNA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 359
6TH MAIN ROAD
7TH BLOCK 2ND STAGE
NAGARBHAVI, BENGALURU - 560 072.
2. MR. B.S. JAGADISH

S/O LATE S.G. SIKHARANNA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 359
6TH MAIN ROAD, 7TH BLOCK
2ND STAGE, NAGARBHAVI
BENGALURU - 560 072. … PETITIONERS

521
AND:

SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
4. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
6. MR. K.K. ANANTHNARAYAN

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
S/O K.N. KESHAVA
RESIDING AT NO 914
LAKSHMI NILAYA, 1ST STAGE
2ND CROSS, BEHIND SOLOMON
APARTMENTS
CHANDRA LAYOUT
7. MR. L. HARISH
S/O R. LAKSHMIKANTH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
RESIDING AT SHREE KABIR
522
ASHRAM, 8TH CROSS

H SIDDAIAH ROAD

SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS INSTITUTED
UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD 03.02.2003
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DTD 03.02.2003 FOR
THE ACQUISITION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FOR
FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT VIDE ANNX-E AND THE
FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNX-G TO HAVE
BEEN ABANDONED AND LAPSED AND HENCE HAVE BECOME
INOPERATIVE IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED.
IN W.P.NO.15096/2019:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SATEESH PILLAI

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O SRI.PARAMESHWARAN PILLAI
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.82, HENNUR MAIN ROAD,
BAGALUR ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST,
(BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.

BANGALORE-560 020.
523

BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHAHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR
AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
MARKED AS ANNEXURE - D AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.15199/2019:
BETWEEN:
SRI. E. LOKESH
S/O SRI ESHWAR MURTHY
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.22,
IST CROSS,
SANJEEVA REDDY STREET,
ANJENARAYANAPPA LAYOUT
SUBBANAPALYA
BANGALORE-560033
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M. S. BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPEMNT AUTHORITY

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
524
KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560020

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPEMNT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST
PALACE ROAD

AS THE PETITIOENRS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
MARKED AS " ANNEXURE -D " AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.15531/2019:
BETWEEN:
SRI. NAVANITHA KRISHNAN

S/O. SRI. RAMADURAI,
PRESENTLY NO.34, 1ST FLOOR,
'KRISHNA BUILDING',
DAYANANDA LAYOUT,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
525
KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS


AS THE PETITIOENRS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
MARKED AS " ANNEXURE -D " AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.15532/2019:
BETWEEN:
MR. A. H. SHOAIB MOHAMMED

S/O SRI. S.A. ABVDUL HAMEED
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.57, 4TH CROSS,

KANAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST
BANGALORE - 560032.
(BY HIS GPA HOLDER SMT. YASMEEN
ABDUL HAMEED, AGED 59 YEARS
W/O S.A. ABDUL HAMEED, R/OF
NO.57, 4TH CROSS,
R.T. NAGAR POST
...PETITIONER
526
AND:

DEPARTEMTN OF HOUSING &
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,

…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN SOF
AR AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
MARKED AS " ANNEXURE - C " AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.15534/2019:
BETWEEN:
SMT. ALLI RAJENDRAN

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
W/O SRI. K. RAJENDRAN
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.57, 4TH CROSS
KANAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE 560032.
...PETITIONER
527
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMNT
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560001.

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,

BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS

AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
MARKED AS ANNEXURE -D AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.26852/2019:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT MUNIYAMMA
W/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
2. SMT RATHNAMMA
D/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
3. SRI APPAIAH
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
528
4. SMT NEELAMMA
W/O LATE MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
5. SMT SAROJAMMA
W/O LATE MUNISWAMY
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
6. SMT SHOBHA
W/O LATE MUNIKRISHNA
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
7. SRI K. GOVINDARAJU
S/O LATE M. KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
8. SMT. NARAYANAMMA
D/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
9. SRI. GANGADHAR
S/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF #210/211

MUNIRAJU COMPOUND
AMRUTHAHALLI MAIN ROAD
SAHAKARANAGARA POST
BENGALURU-560 092
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAJAGOPAL M. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHRORITY

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
529
KUMARA PARK WEST

BENGALURU-560 020
3. THE SEPCIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

ACQUISITION INITIATED BY ISSUING THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY R-2 AS PER
ANNEXURE -F, FOLLOWED BY THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 AS PER ANNEXURE - G AND THE RE-
DO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AS
PER ANNEXURE-H IS LAPSED AND THE PROVISIONS UNDER THE
BENGALURU PARTICULARLY SECTION 36(30) IS INAPPLICABLE
BY APPLYING SECTION 27 OF THE SAID ACT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.50257/2019:
BETWEEN:
1. NARAYANASWAMY
S/O. MUNIYAPPA,
2. MUNIYAPPA
S/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA,
3. CHANDRA
S/O. MUNIYAPPA,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF

K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU-560 016
530
REPT. BY THEIR G.P.A. HOLDER,

SYED AKMAL PASHA,
S/O. SYED ABDUL RAWOOF,
R/AT NO.157/2,
NEHRUPURAM,
SHIVAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 001.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. A. KUMARAVEL, ADVOCATE)
AND:

BY ITS SECRETARY,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020,
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH ARE PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE -
G AND H RESPECTIVELY IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE
IN W.P.NO.10568/2015:
BETWEEN:
MR. A. ALBERT ANTHONY

S/O LATE J ANTHONY
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
RESIDING AT # SITE NUMBER - 2
HOUSE LIST KHATHA NO. 228/2
K R PURAM HOBLI
531

BANGALORE-560
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
K. P. WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

NORTH DIVISION,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
K P WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
NORTH DIVISION,
B D A COMPLEX
R T NAGAR
BANGALORE-560032

NORTH DIVISION,
B D A COMPLEX
R. T. NAGAR
BANGALORE-560032

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANGALORE-560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR
SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4;

NOTIFICATION HAVING NUMBER DATED 03.02.2003 A TRUE
532
COPY IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A AND THE

FINAL NOTIFICATION HAVING DATED 23.02.2004 PRODUCED AS
ANNEXURE - B AND ALSO 2ND FRESH FINAL NOTIFICATION
HAVING DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -C AS
THEY ARE LAPSED AND ALSO THAT THEY ARE BAD IN LAW AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.15003/2013:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. KANTHI HEGDE

W/O. S.M. HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/O "KANTHI"
NO. 13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT
1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD
2. SRI. HARSHA HEGDE

S/O. S.M. HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/O "KANTHI"
3. SMT. RASHMI HEGDE

D/O S.M. HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/O " KANTHI"
BANGALORE - 560 020

BY THEIR P A HOLDER SMT. KANTHI HEGDE
…PETITIONERS
(SRI. S.M. HEGDE KADAVE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
533
M.S. BUILDING

BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE -560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
INFANTRY ROAD


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF
THE COMMISSIONER ALLOTTING A CA SITE IN FAVOUR OF
HENNUR POLICE STATION DATED 11.02.2010 UNDER ANN - X
NUMBERING NIL IN SO FAR AS IT RELATE TO THE ORDER
PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER, BDA AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.14874/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT BHARATHI SHIVAKUMAR

W/O SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.16
5TH CROSS, HOYSALA LAYOUT
SRIRAMAPURA MAIN ROAD
AMURTHAHALLI
SAHAKARANAGARA POST
BANGALORE - 560092
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. S. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)
534
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020

DR T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020

DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

PURSUANCE OF THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004
VIDE ANN - L, STOOD LAPSED IN SO FAR AS THE PETITION
SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.27833/2014:
BETWEEN:
M/S SOBHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED

A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE
COMPANYS ACT 1956,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
535
AT DEVARABISANAHALLI
SARJAPUR-MARATHAHALI OUTER RING ROAD
BELLANDUR POST
BANGALORE-560103
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
SMT. PADMAVATHI V
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ, ADVOCATE )
AND:

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT
KANDAYA BHAVANA
K. G. ROAD
BANGALORE-560009
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

REVENUE DEPARTMENT
M. S. BUIDLING
BANGALORE - 560 001

M. S. BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST, GUTTAHALLI
BANGALORE-560020
5. ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. T.P. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY, ADVOCATE AND

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE R-3 AND R-
4 TO DE-NOTIFY THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY FROM
536
THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANN-AJ IN SO

FAR AS RESIDENTIALLY CONVERTED IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IN
SY.NO.30 MEASURING 1 ACRE 12 GUNTAS OF SAMPIGEHALLI
VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,
BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.42498/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. AVINASH
S/O A ANAND
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT NO.10A, 12TH A CROSS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
2. SRI ANJANKUMAR
S/O MUNIRAJU
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
R/AT NO.3, 13TH A CROSS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
3. SMT CHAYADEVI
D/O SRI HANUMANTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
4. SRI ASHWIN J. S.
S/O SRIKANTA S
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT NO.1 & 4
12TH A CROSS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
5. SMT SUMITHRA SATHISH

W/O SATHISH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
537
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
6. SRI MUNIHANUMAIAH
S/O MUNIHANUMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
7. SMT GOWRAMMA
W/O SADAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
8. SRI BYRAPPA
S/O MUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
9. SRI SOMASHEKAR
S/O SONAPPA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
10. SRI MANJUNATH G

S/O A GOPAL
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT NO.3 AND 4
12TH A CROSS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
538
11. SRI A NARAYANASWAMY

S/O AVALAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
12. SMT SHOBHA

W/O UDAYAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
13. SMT AMINABI

W/O BASHA B
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
14. RAVISHANKAR BHAVE

S/O M V BHAVE
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
15. SMT RAJAESHWARI
W/O. M. C. BACHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K. H. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. SUMITHRA G.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
539

BANGALORE
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 20
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 20
4. SRI ANJENE GOWDA

S/O LATE PILLAPPA AND
SMT. LATE MUNIYAMMA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
5. SRI. BYRAPPA
S/O. SRI NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
6. P. RAMACHANDRAPPA
S/O LATE PILLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 RESIDING
AT JAKKUR VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE R2 & R3;
SRI. AMAREESH A ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SRI. N JAI PRAKASH RAO, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. B. SRINIVASGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SKETCH
ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO R-6 DATED
03.10.2011 VIDE ANNEX - A BY EXCLUDING THE LAND OF THE
540
R-4 TO R-6 FROM THE ACQUISITION AND INCLUDED THE LAND

TO THE EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 26 GUNTAS IN WHICH PETITIONERS
CONSTRUCTED THEIR RESIDENTIAL HOUSES IN THE
ACQUISITION AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.45230/2014:
BETWEEN
S. HEMAVATHI
W/O LAKKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
2ND CROSS, 3RD PHASE,
1ST MAIN, MANJUNATHANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 010. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE)
AND:
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE -1

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE -20

NORTH DIVISION
BANGALORE -20

R.T. NAGAR
BANGALORE -20

NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX
541
R.T. NAGAR,
BANGALORE -20. …RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH DECLARE THAT
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY SITUATED IN SY.NO.40 (PRESENT
SY.NO.40/P1P1) AND NOT BEING PART OF THE LANDS NOTIFIED
FOR ACQUSITION EITHER UNDER THE PRELIMINARY OF FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 & 22.03.2004 VIDE ANNX - K &
L UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2003 AND
U/S 19 OF THE B.D.A ACT 1976 DATED 22.03.2004, THE
RESPONDENTS HAVE NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ACT IN
RESPECT OF THE SAME IN ANY MANNER THE PROPERTY
PRESENTLY COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE BBMP
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47606/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI P. VENUGOPAL
S/O P.KRISHNAPPA,
R/AT 'MAHATE',
NO.72/1, 3RD MAIN,
16TH CROSS, G.D. PARK EXTENSION,
VYALIKAVAL,
BANGALORE-560 003.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PATIL JAI M., ADVOCATE )
AND:

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
542
BANGALORE-560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3
R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2014)

DEVELOPMENT (RFD), IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (ANNX - K TO
THE W.P.) IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR
ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AS AGAINST SY.NOS 45/5 & 45/6 IS
(PROPERTY) AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47607/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT. P. CHANDRAKALA
W/O P. VENUGOPAL,
R/A. 'MAHATE' NO.72/1,
3RD MAIN, 16TH CROSS,
543
G.D PARK EXTENSION,

VYALIKAVAL,
BANGALORE - 560 003
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE )
AND:

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020

REPRESENTED ITS SECRETARY
VIKAS SOUDHA
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3
R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE
ORDER DATED 20.10.2014)

DEVELOPMENT (RFD) IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT
(VIDE ANNX -K TO THE W.P.) AS AGAINST SY.NOS. 45/5 & 45/6 IS
544

(PROPERTY) AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.58829/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. CAPT. LAKSHMANAN VELLIKATH

S/O LATE V KUNHIRAMAN,
RESIDING AT HOUSENO.48 AND 49,
SY NO.97/2,I CROSS,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
2. COL N. R. BALARAMAN,
S/O LATE NARAYANA RAO,
RESIDING AT NO.6,
SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
3. SRI. V. M. SATHISH
S/O SRI V V MADAVAN,
RESDIIDNG AT NO.57,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
4. SRI J. N. NAVEEN,
S/O LATE J. NARAYANAPPA,
RESIDING AT NO.70,
SY NO.97/2,1ST CROSS,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
5. SRI GANESH HEGDE

S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA HEGDE,
545
6. SMT.SANDHYA GANESH HEGDE,

W/O SRIGANESH HEGDE,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
7. SMT. CHANNAMMA
W/O KAKAPPA,
RESIDING AT NO.172,1ST FLOOR,
L K RAJU BUILDING,
1ST MAIN,MILK COLONY,
SUBRAMANYANAGAR,
BANGLORE-560 010.
8. SRI VISHWANATH N V
RESIDING AT NO.63,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
9. SMT SHASHIKALA
W/O LATE K LAKSHMINARAYANA,
RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.63,
SY NO.97/1, 3RD CROSS,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
10. SMT. SANDHYA

W/O SRI GANESH HEGDE,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
11. SMT. P BANUMATHI

W/O LATE RAMESH BABU,
RESIDING AT NO.3641,
13 'B' MAIN ROAD,
546
H.A.L.,
BANGALORE-560 038.
12. SMT MEENA,

W/O LATE MUNIRAJ,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
13. SRI GOPAL C.,

S/O CHANNAPPA,
RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.18 AND 19,
SY NO.97/1, 4TH CROSS,
NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR,
BANGALORE-560 064.
14. SRI. A. G. RAMAN

15. SMT.K LAKSHMI,


8TH A CROSS,
PRASHANTHNAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 079.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
K. P. WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
547

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
K. P. WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE AND

KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1
UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BDA ACT VIDE ANN-K IN SO FAR
AS IT RELATES TO THE LANDS IN SY.NO. 97/2 AND 97/1
MEASURING 2 ACRES 36 GUNTAS AND 4 ACRES 37 GUNTAS,
SITUATED AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2935/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. MOHAMMED AJAZ SHERRIFF

SON OF ABDUL SUBHAN,
RESIDING AT NO.9, AGA ABDULLA STREET,
RICHMOND STREET, BANGALORE-560 025.
...PETITIONER
AND:

REPRESETNED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKAS SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
548

(LAND ACQUSITION),
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 T0 R4)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND DECLARE
THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003
VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE
ANN - D, FINAL NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA
GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E, AWARDS DATED
18.10.2004 VIDE ANN-F & G, AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR
DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN - K
AND L, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVE
LAPSED BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
24[2] OF RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN
LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT
2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2936/2015:
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED FIAZ SHARIFF

SON OF ABDUL SUBHAN,
RESIDING AT NO.9,
549
AGA ABDULLA STREET,

RICHMOND STREET,
BANGALORE-560 025.
...PETITIONER
AND:

REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKAS SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

(LAND ACQUISITION),
BANGALORE-560 020.

BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)

VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE
ANN - D, FINAL NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA
GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E, AWARDS DATED
18.10.2004 VIDE ANN-F & G, AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR
DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN - K
550

24[2] OF RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN
2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2937/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI NAQHI R
S/O BABU SAB
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO. 9,
AGA ABDULLA STREET,
RICHMOND STREET,
BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONER
AND:

REPRESENTED BY THE
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

(LAND ACQUISITION)
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
4. THE LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
551
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)

ISSUED BY R-2 VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANN-D, FINAL NOTIFICATION
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014
ISSUED BY R1 VIDE ANN-E, AWARDS DATED 18.10.2004 VIDE
ANN -F & G, ISSUED BY R-4 AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR
DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN -K
24[2] OF RIGHT TO AIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN
2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.6225/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. HARISH PRABHU B. G.

S/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNA PRABHU,
2. SRI SATISH PRABHU B G

S/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNA PRABHU,
BOTH ARE R/AT:
NO.3525/2/69/3,
MARUTHI LAYOUT,
DASARAHALLI,
VIRUPAKSHAPURA,
BANGALORE - 560 036
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND
552
SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
3. SECRETARY
THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
M.S. BUILDING
BANGALORE
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3
STATE GOVT. IMPLEADED AS PARTY
AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 20/01/2016)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE OFFICIALS
OF THE RESPONDENTS OF BDA NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE
PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE SUIT
SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS THE SAME IS NOT ACQUIRED FOR
THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.7038/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI D. RAMANAKUMAR
SON OF LATE D. KOTESWARA RAO,
RESIDING AT DOOR NO.45/D1
OLD MARKET ROAD,
CANTONMENT,
BELLARY-583 104
...PETITIONER
553
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001

BY ITS COMMISSINOER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE.

KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
4. SRI SUBRAMANI
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA,
5. SRI. KANDAPPA
S/O. MUNISHAMAPPA,
6. SRI. RAMESH
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
7. SRI LAKSHMANA
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7
ARE RESIDENTS OF
SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 018
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7)
554

ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO
7 DATED 08.01.2005 VIDE ANN - R AND QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO
7 DATED 31.05.2012 VIDE ANN - U AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.7322/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. DR. RENUKA DEVI

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
W/O DR. H. S. PRABHAKARA
2. DR H. S. PRABHAKARA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
BOTH RESIDING AT NO.389,

1ST FLOOR, F BLOCK
SAHAKARNAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 092
...PETITIONERS
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE - 560 001

T. CHOWDIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER

ACQUISITION OFFICER
555

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS


CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ISSUE AN ENDORSEMENT IN
FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS ON THE SAME TERMS AS
ENDORSEMENT DATED 09.03.2012 (ANNX -J) ISSUED IN
RESPECT OF ADJACENT SITE NOS. 65 & SITE NO.20 SITUATED
IN SY.NO. 79, DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
CONFIRMING THAT THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS NOT PART OF
THE ACQUIRED PORTION OF THE LAND AND GRANT ALL
IN W.P.NO.8111/2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. DEVI VISWANATHAN

W/O T. VISWANATHAN
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
R/A NO.1590, 8TH STREET
KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, IST STAGE
NEAR DAYANANDA
ENGINEERING COLLEGE
BANGALORE-560078
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
556
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
REPRESENTED BY
ITS COMMISSIONER

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS


NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX - G) IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.83/4
OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TO., BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO. 575 OF
THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED
18.06.2014 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8112/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI T. VISWANATHAN
S/O P N THIRUGANANASAMBANDAM
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1590, 8TH STREET
KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, IST STAGE
NEAR DAYANANDA ENGINEERING COLLEGE
BANGALORE-560 078
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE)
557
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-G) IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.83/4
OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE. K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TQ., BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO. 575 OF
THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED
18.06.2014 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.19086/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. H. V. RAJESH
S/O SRI. H. S. VARADARAJA IYENGAR,
RESIDING AT
558
NO.100, 8TH CROSS,

MALLESHWARAM ,
BANGALORE - 03
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. H. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:

BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 20

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 20.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - F AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.21999/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT M. SHASHIKALA
W/O SHRI RAMESH RAO,
RESIDING AT NO.218,
'SHASHIRA',
TEACHERS COLONY,
NAGARABHAVI,
BANGALORE-560 072.
559
2. SMT.KALAVATHI BAI
W/O SHRI. ROOP SINGH,
R/AT NO.125, M.S.S.R NAGAR,
MATHIKERE,
BANGALORE-560 054.
3. SMT. JOHNSY BEULA

W/O SHRI. ARTHUR SOLOMON,
R/AT NO.8, ANUJAY,
CAUVERY STREET,
ANJANEYASWAMY LAYOUT,
THINDLU,
VIDYARANYAPURA POST,
BANGALORE-560 097.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NITIN R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSISONER
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
K.P.WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
K.P.WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SECOND
560
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE

KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNX -H AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.28675/2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. K. NAVANEETHA
W/O LATE K. SEETHARAM
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT NO.49, DVG ROAD
GREEN GARDEN, III MAIN
II PHASE, BANJARA LAYOUT
HORAMAVU, KALKERE POST
BENGALURU - 560 043
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPOMENT DEPARTMENT
5TH FLOOR, M. S. BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU - 560 020

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND R-1
561
& 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE

(2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE
PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - P & Q RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED
THROUGH HER SOCIETY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.34826/2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. KANTHI HEGDE

W/O S.M. HEGDE,
R/O KANTHI,
NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT,
1ST MAIN,
PALACE CROSS ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
2. SRI.HARSHA HEGDE
S/O S.M. HEGDE,
R/O KANTHI, NO.13,
CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT,
1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
3. SMT.RASHMI HEGDE
D/O S.M.HEGDE,
R/O KANTHI, NO.13,
CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT,
1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.

BY THEIR P A HOLDER
SMT.KANTHI HEGDE
R/O. KANTHI NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT
1ST MAIN PALACE CROSS ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. YESHU MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S.M. HEGDE KADAVE, ADVOCATE)
562
AND:
& URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO
SITE NOS. 3, 5, 7, 9 & 12 FORMED IN THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.
82/8 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE SOUTH TQ., VIDE ANNX -D AS STATED IN THE
SCHEDULE ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.59793/2015:
BETWEEN:
M/S. SOBHA PROJECTS AND

TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED,
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT 1956,
HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT
NO.23/1, SONNENAHALLI VILLAGE,
BROOKE FIELD, MAHADEVAPURA POST,
BANGALORE-560 048
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
563
BY SMT. V. PADMAVATHI
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MADHUKAR DESHAPANDE, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. S.V.BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:

HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 03

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 03
4. SRI.MADHUSOODAN NAMBIAR
S/O SRI.KUPPADAKATH RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR,
AGED 56 YEARS,
NO.1, CHRISTELLA VILLA,
206, WHITEFIELD,
BANGALORE-560 066
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. VISHWANATH R. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 UNDER SECTION 17[1] OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT,1976 [KARNATAKA ACT.NO.12
OF 1976] VIDE ANNEX -J IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.137/1 OF
CHALLAKERE VILLAGE, OF WHICH THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY
FORMS PORT AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION VIDE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 19[1]
OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976
564
[KARNATAKA ACT NO.12 OF 1976] VIDE ANNEX - L IN RESPECT

OF SY.NO.137/1 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE OF WHICH THE
SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMS PORT IN THE ALTERNATIVELY
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.1876/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. SARADA
W/O MANJUNATH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/A NO.44/2, 7TH CROSS
7TH MAIN, MALLESWARAM
BANGALORE-560003
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE)
AND:

& URBAN DEVELOPMENT
M. S. BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D IN SO FAR AS
565
THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE

SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8603/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. DILIP PRABHAN

S/O SRI R. PRABHAKAR
MAJOR, RESIDING AT
LAXMI NIVAS MAMANGALM,
PALARIVATTON
COCHIN-680025
KERALA STATE
REPRESENTED BY HIS
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
NAMBIAR RAGHAVAN MADHUSOODAN
S/O LATE SRI RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
RESIDING AT CHRISTELLA VILLA NO.1
206, WHITEFIELD, MAIN ROAD
BANGALORE-66
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. MANJUNATHA V RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY

VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE-1
2. COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
566

LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION BENGALURU DATED
03.02.2003 AT ANNEX - G AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION
VIDE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8707/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. M. NAMBOODIRIPAD
S/O SRI. NAMBOODIRI PAD,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
NOW RESIDING AT,
APARTMENT C-403,
MANASA ROYAL,
OPPOSITE NARAYANANANDA
YOGA ASHRAM,HINKAL,
MYSORE-570 030.
REPRESENTED BY HIS,
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
NAMBIAR RAGHAVAN MADHUSOODAN,
MAJOR,
S/O LATE SRI. RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR,
RESIDING AT VILLA NO.1,
CRISTALA,206, WHITE FIELD, MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-66.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR SAMANTH, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. MANJUNATHA V. RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY

VIKAS SOUDHA
BANGALORE-01.
2. COMMISSIONER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGLAORE-560001.
567

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENTS

LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AT ANNEX
-G AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION VIDE NOTIFICATION
DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.16505/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. BASAPPA
S/O. LATE MUNIVEERAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
AMANIBYRATHIKANE
K.R. PURAM HOBLI
BANGALORE EAST - 560 036
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
STATE OF KARNATAKA
VIKASA SOUDHA
2. THE COMMISSIONER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020

KUMARA PARK WEST
568
BANGALORE - 560 020

BANASWADI DIVISION
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 043
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1-R4;
SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE -E INSOFAR AS
PETITIONER LAND AND DECLARE THAT THE LAND BEARING
SY.NO.5/2 AN EXTENT OF 0.34 GUNTAS NOTIFIED FOR
ACQUISITION IN THE YEAR 2004 FAIL TO TAKE POSSESSION AND
PASS AWARD AS PROVIDED UNDER THE STATUES
CONSEQUENTLY THE SCHEME IS LAPSED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.20131/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI JANAK RANJIT TOPRANI

S/O SRI. RANJIT HARIDAS TOPRANI
R/AT 311-312 SHEFFIELD TOWERS,
2ND CROSS LANE,
LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX,
ANDHERI WEST,
MUMBAI-400 053.
...PETITIONER
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
569
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQISITION OFFICER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E ISSUED BY
THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND
RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.20132/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI JANAK RANJIT TOPRANI

S/O SRI RANJIT HARIDAS TOPRANI,
R/AT 311-312 SHEFFIELD TOWERS,
2ND CROSS LANE,
LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX, ANDHERI WEST,
MUMBAI-400 053.
...PETITIONER
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNTAKA

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
570

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020,

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

ANNEXURE -E ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE
PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO. 34947/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. MR. MANSOOR PASHA N.

S/O LATE NAWAB JAN,
R/AT SITE BEARING NO.34,
JANJAR NO.1433/1,
KHATA NO.34,
VIDYA SAGAR LAYOUT,
THANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
2. MR.MOHAMMED FAROOQ
S/O LATE GULAM HUSSAIN,
3. MRS. SHAKEELA BANU

W/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ,
JANJAR NO.1433D/1,
KHATA NO.35, VIDYA SAGAR LAYOUT,
571
THANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,

BANGALORE.
4. SMT.ALMAS
W/O AMJAD PASHA,
R/AT NO.19/3, 3RD FLOOR,
SIDDARTHA NAGAR, 1ST CROSS,
BANGALORE-560 053.
5. SMT.MUBEEN TAJ
W/O CHAND PASHA,
R/AT NO.44, KATHA NO.2812,
KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE.
6. MR.IMTIYAZ PASHA
S/O MOHAMMED YACOOB,
R/AT NO.19/3, 1ST FLOOR,
SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, 1ST CROSS,
BANGALORE-560 053.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MOHAMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMEMT AUTHORITY,
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020.
572

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGAORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4;

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT
ANNEX - J AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.35309/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT ASMA BEGUM

W/O. SYED EHTSHAMUDDIN,
RESIDING AT NO. 66,
K.H.M. BLOCK,
GANGANAGAR,
4TH MAIN,
BANGALORE - 560032
2. SMT. S. ANSARI BEGUM

W/O. ABDUL MAJEED,
RESIDING AT NO. 75,
PILLANNA GARDEN,
1ST STAGE,
BANGALORE - 560084
3. SMT. ZEENATHI JAN

WIFE OF LATE. MOHAMMED SAMIULLA,
R/AT NO. 9, 4TH-B-CROSS,
16TH STREET,
CHANDINI CHOWK ROAD,
SHIVAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560001
573
4. SRI. S. SELVARAJ
S/O. B. SUBRAMANYAM,
RAMACHANDRAPPA LAYOUT,
KARIYANNAPALYA,
BANGALORE - 560084
5. SRI. A NELSON MARIANATHAN

S/O. A AUGUSTINE,
RESIDING AT NO. 314/5,
C-BLOCK, AMBEDKARNAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 045
6. SMT. AISHA JHAN

WIFE OF MOHAMMED AKRAM
4TH MAIN, SRIRAMPURAM,
BANGALORE - 560 021
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560 021
2. THE COMMISSIONER
SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020

SANKEY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
574


NOTIFICATION ISSUED BYTHE R-1 AT ANNX -H BANGALORE
DATED 18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
NOTIFICATION AT ANNX - H AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.39427/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. FAROOK KHAN

S/O. AYAZ GHANI KHAN,
RESIDING AT NO.43,
INFANTRY ROAD,
SHIVAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. SMT. JABEEN TAJ

D/O. NAZEER AHMED,
CHUNCHAPPA BLOCK,
R.T. NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 062.
...PETITIONERS
(BY S. V. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BDA, KUMARA PARK,
BENGALURU-560 020.
575

BDA, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR AND

NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE - E) AND ALSO
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ( ANNEXURE -G) ISSUED
BY R-1 & 2 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE
CONCERNED AS ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL ULTRA - VIRES
AND OPPOSED TO ALL CANNONS OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL
JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47965/2016:
BETWEEN:
M/S. CONNEXIONS L.P.G. AND ACCESSORIES

A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM CONSTITUTED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT:
NO.116, P & T COLONY, R.T. NAGAR,
3RD CROSS, 2ND BLOCK,
BANGALORE-560 032.
AND HAVING ITS GODOWN AT:
SITE BEARING NOS. 1, 1/A & 1/B,

HOUSE LIST NO.99, KHATHA NO. 384/A,
HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 084,
REPRESENTED BY DULY AUTHORIZED PARTNER:
MR. T. RAMU,
S/O. LATE SRI. MADHAVA NAIDU T.,
576
NO.116, P & T COLONY, R.T. NAGAR,

3RD CROSS, 2ND BLOCK,
BANGALORE-560 032.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GANESH BHAT Y. H., ADVOCATE)
AND:

URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -T AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51142/2016:
BETWEEN:
MRS. SHERIN MICHAEL

AGED 55 YEARS,
WIFE OF MR. PRAKASH EARNEST MICHAEL
RESIDING AT NO.26,
1ST MAIN,
2ND & 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
577
BANGALORE-560077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.55666/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. S. G. JAYADEVAIAH
SON OF SRI. S.GANGA SETTY,
578
NO.82, 1ST MAIN,

6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020
3. THE ADDITIONAL AND ACQUISITION OFFICER

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

579
IN W.P.NO.57150/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. KARTHIGEYAN JAYARAJ

S/O SRI R JAYARAJ,
NO.49, IST MAIN, 4TH CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI,
K.NARAYAPURA POST,
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETATY,
M.S.BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK ROAD,
BANGALORE-560020

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO. 31,
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -M IS ILLEGAL,
580
IN W.P.NO.57245/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. MAHESH C.,

SON OF SRI. V. S. CHANDRASEGARAM
NO.45, 1ST MAIN,
BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE - 560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
REPRESENTED BY
ITS COMMISSIONER

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL,
581

IN W.P.NO.58220/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. J. VEERESH
SON OF SRI. S.M. JAYANNA
NO.23, 2ND MAIN,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
REPRESENTED BY
ITS COMMISSIONER.

KUMARA PARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS


582

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEXURE -K] IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.58223/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SIMON LAWRENCE

SON OF SRI. PETER JOSEPH
NO.138, 2ND MAIN,
K.NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED BY
ITS COMMISSIONER

ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
583

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL,
HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.58362/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SAGAYI RAJU

SON OF SRI. JOSEPH,
NO. 40, 2ND MAIN,
BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020.

584
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
…RESPONDENTS

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.062014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.59167/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. C. CHOWRAPPA
7TH CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI
K.NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M.S.BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
585

KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO. 31,
TALUK, INCLUDED AT AL NO. 251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE -J] IS ILLEGAL,
IN -OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.59169/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. R. JAYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
WIFE OF LATE V RAJU
NO 114, 8TH CROSS,
GEDDALAHALLI
BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE - 560001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 002
586

ACQUISITION OFFICER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560002
…RESPONDENTS

HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.61955/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. A. AROCKIA DASS

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
SON OF LATE A. AROCKIA SWAMY
NO. 51, 2ND MAIN
CHANDRA SHEKAR LAYOUT
…PETITIONER
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE - 560001

587
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 002
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560002
…RESPONDENTS

EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE -K] IS ILLEGAL,
IN W.P.NO.63205/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. I. AROKIA SWAMY

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
SON OF LATE R. ISSAC
NO 93, 1ST MAIN,
BANGALORE - 560077
...PETITIONER
AND:
M. S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE - 560001
588

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
REPRESENTED BY
ITS COMMISSIONER

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31 GEDDALAHALLI
VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT
JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-
IN W.P.NO.2531/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. ASHA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
W/O N. KRISHNA RAO,
RESIDENT OF NO.19/1 (OLD NO.10/1)
1ST FLOOR,9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL EXTENSION,
MALLESWARAM,
BANGALORE-560 003
2. HARISH KHANNA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
S/O K. L. KHANNA,
RESIDENT OF NO.E702,
589
RAINBOW VISTA, IDL ROAD,

KUKKATPALLY,
HYDERABAD-500 072
3. I. K. KHANNA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
SON OF M. L. KHANNA,
RESIDENT OF NO.GA SHARAMALAYA
II PRITHVI AVENUE,
2ND STREET,ABHIRAMAPURAM,
CHENNAI-600 018
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)
AND:

KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001

ARKAVATHY LAYOUT,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 )

THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND
IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE
GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN
IN W.P.NO.5209/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. T. X. MATHEWS
S/O LATE XAVIER
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
590
2. MRS. USHA MATHEWS

W/O MR. T. X. MATHEWS
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
BOTH AT NO.41
2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS
GEDDALAHALLI
K. NARYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONERS
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS

PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31 GEDDALAHALLI
VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT
JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-
591
IN W.P.NO.5212/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. PRAVEENA SHREE E.

D/O M. EKAMBARAM
AGED 36 YEARS
2. SMT. BRINDA E. SURESH

D/O M EKAMBARAM
AGED 33 YEARS

NO.63, 1ST MAIN
BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONERS
AND:
M.S. BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED BY
ITS COMMISSIONER

ACQUISITION OFFICER
KUMARA PARK WEST


592

NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L PASSED BY R-
1 IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-
EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.37478/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. GEETHA
W/O. SUDHAKAR HEBBAR
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT 43 NISARGH, 3RD MAIN ROAD
M. M. S. LAYOUT
VIDHYARANYAPURA,
BANGALORE-560097
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE )
AND:
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
M. S. BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001
REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020

CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS

593

ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PRL.NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT
ANNEX -G & H ISSUED BY R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE
PROVISIONS OF SEC.24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION
AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT 30/2013) AND
CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN
APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN VIEW OF THE DEEMED
PROVISIONS OF SEC. 24(2) OF THE NEW ACT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.37480/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. K. NALINI
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
W/O. P KRISHNAMURTHY
R/AT 242 NEW NO.230
A.K.COLONY,B.S.A.ROAD CROSS,
NEAR LITTLE BOBBIN SCHOOL,
BANGALORE-560 005
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001
REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE SPECIAL LAND

ACQUISITION OFFICER
594

CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS


ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.03 THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-H, ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED IN
VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR
COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION,
REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT
30 OF 2013) AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT
TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN VIEW OF THE
DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE NEW ACT AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.19783/2018:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. R. BHAGYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
W/O. SRI. R. SHYAMPRASAD REDDY,
2. R. SHYAM PRASAD REDDY

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O. LATE. R T MALLAREDDY,

AT FLAT NO. 702, SAI KUTEER APARTMENT,
SY. NO. 2/1, VIDYANAGAR,
DR. SHIVARAMAKARANTH POST,
BENGALURU 560077.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C M NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)

595
AND:

VIKASA SOUDHA,

T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020.

ACQUISITION OFFICER
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS

ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED VIDE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003, ISSUED UNDER SECTION
17(1) OF THE BDA ACT, 1976 VIDE ANNEX -E BY THE R-2 &
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-F ISSUED BY THE
R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE
CONCERNED AS LAPSED, IN VIEW OF SECTION 27 OF THE
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND

RESERVED FOR ORDERS, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
596
ORDER
In all these writ petitions, challenge is laid to the
Preliminary Notification No.BDA/CMMR/KLAO/LA19/
104/2002-03, BANGALORE, dated 03.02.2003, Final
Notification No.UDD 193 MNX 2004, BANGALORE, dated
23.02.2004 and revised/modified Notification bearing No.UDD
426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE dated 18.06.2014 issued under
Section 17(1) & (3) and sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the
Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (for short ‘BDA
Act’) respectively for the purposes of wit for the formation of
Layout called “ARKAVATI LAYOUT” at Bengaluru.
BRIEF HISTORY:
2. The Bangalore Development Authority (for short
‘BDA’) issued a Preliminary Notification under Section 17(3) of
the BDA Act for acquisition of 3339 acres of land for formation
of Arkavati Layout on 03.02.2003. A modified Preliminary
Notification came to be issued on 16.09.2003 showing the
extent of land as 3,839 acres 12 guntas situated in the
following 16 villages:
1) Dasarahalli
2) Byrathikane
597
3) Challakere
4) Geddalahalli
5) K Narayanapura
6) Rachenahalli
7) Thanisandra
8) Amruthhalli
9) Jakkur
10) Kempapura
11) Sampigehalli
12) Srirampura
13) Venkateshpura
14) Hennur
15) Hebbala
16) Nagavara
3. Notices under Section 17(5) of the BDA Act was
issued and there was no objection received in respect of 91
acres 7 guntas. Objections received in respect of 2658 acres
were rejected. BDA resolved to delete 1089 acres 12 guntas of
land and to obtain sanction for 2750 acres. Accordingly, a
scheme formulated came to be sanctioned by the Government
of Karnataka (for short ‘State’) under Section 18(3) of the BDA

598
Act for 2750 acres of land. Final Notification dated 23.02.2004
came to be issued for acquisition of 2750 acres of land
situated in the aforesaid 16 villages. Awards came to be
passed to an extent of 1618.38 acres. BDA claims to have
taken possession in respect of 1459.37 acres of private land
and 459.16 acres of Government land and in all, 1919.13
acres of land. BDA claims to have formed the Layout by
carving 14103 plots/sites apart from developing the roads,
drains, civic amenity sites, etc.
4. The acquisition proceedings came to be questioned
before this court by filing writ petitions on several grounds
in W.P.Nos.51119-51132/2004 and connected matters. The
learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions by declaring
that BDA has no jurisdiction to frame developmental schemes
in Bangalore Metropolitan Area amongst granting other reliefs.
This order was challenged in Writ Appeal No.2625/2005 and
connected matters. Since some of the writ petitions had also
been filed challenging acquisition of lands for the formation of
“Arkavati Layout” on the grounds, which had been upheld by
the learned Single Judge, they were also taken up for
consideration by Division Bench since identical questions of

599
law and fact arose for consideration along with writ appeals.
The Division Bench in the matter of THE COMMISSIONER
BDA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS
SECRETARY reported in ILR 2006 KAR 318 (hereinafter
referred to as "Division Bench") by order dated 25.11.2005
allowed the writ appeals filed by the BDA and State, and set
aside the order dated 15.04.2005 passed by the learned Single
Judge and dismissed the challenge laid to acquisition of lands
for formation of Arkavati Layout. The acquisition of lands
came to be upheld by Division Bench subject to the conditions
stipulated thereunder.
5. In fact, Division Bench was also persuaded by the
Memo filed by BDA, which was also taken note of by the
Division Bench while issuing directions.
6. The order passed by the Division Bench of this
Court came to be challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court
and after considering the rival contentions, Hon’ble Apex Court
in the matter of BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHERS vs
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS
reported in (2010) 7 SCC 129 (hereinafter referred to as

600
“BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case”) upheld the decision of the
Division Bench, subject to BDA’s actions to take certain
corrective measures by requiring it to reexamine certain
aspects and provide an option to the land losers to secure
some additional benefit as an incentive to accept the
acquisition. In other words, directions issued by the Division
Bench noted supra was affirmed subject to further directions
and clarifications issued thereunder. The Hon’ble Apex Court
had also observed that all allotments made by BDA either by
forming Layouts or by way of bulk allotments, would be
subject to the modified directions issued, extracted herein
above.
7. Pursuant to said clarification and directions issued
by Hon’ble Apex Court, BDA is said to have undertaken the
exercise and in the process, has recommended certain lands to
be excluded from entire acquisition by submitting re-modified
scheme for approval by the appropriate Government and in
terms of the order dated 03.04.2014 (Annexure-C in
W.P.No.59219/2014) has approved the same.

601
8. By virtue of aforesaid order passed by the Hon’ble
Apex Court and keeping in view the additional directions
issued, the State issued a Notification dated 18.03.2011
declaring that land owners are entitled for allotment of
developed plots in the ratio of 60:40 in 55% of the land
acquired after deducting the land to be utilized for civic
amenity purposes.
9. The BDA pursuant to directions issued has
conducted an enquiry through Land Acquisition Officers by
examining the applications and representations submitted by
various applicants and placed the said report before the Board
of BDA. Subsequently, BDA has approved the report and
restricted the total area to 176.07 acres of land for acquisition
by deleting 983.33 guntas vide resolution No.79/2013 dated
12.02.2013. The deleted lands measuring 983.33 guntas
included 198 acres 20 guntas of denotified lands and 83 acre 8
guntas of land in respect of which acquisition proceedings had
been already quashed in different cases. On the report
submitted by the BDA forwarded to the Government, the State
issued a modified scheme and thereafter the Notification dated
18.06.2014 came to be issued, under which an extent of 1766

602
acres 7 guntas of land was sought to be acquired. It is this
Notification which has been challenged in these writ petitions
apart from challenging the earlier Notification also by some of
the petitioners.
CONTENTIONS OF PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS:
10. Sum and substance of the grievance of the
petitioners in these writ petitions revolves around the following
contentions:
10.1 Some of the writ petitions have been filed by the
bonafide allottees of the sites formed by BDA in Arkavati
Layout, pursuant to which possession certificates have been
issued and Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of the
respective sites allotted to them have also been executed. They
have also sought for direction to the BDA to issue either
possession certificate or execute Lease cum Sale Agreement or
absolute sale deed and for issuance of khata.
10.2 In few of the writ petitions like W.P.No.42063/2012
and other matters, the Notification issued under sub-section(1)
of Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘LA
Act’), which came to be issued by the State withdrawing the

603
lands specified thereunder from acquisition has been called in
question contending interalia that pursuant to Preliminary and
Final Notification issued, BDA has formed the layout and sites
have been allotted to them and Lease cum Sale Deed have also
been executed in their favour and they are in possession and
enjoyment of the sites and as such Government could not have
denotified certain lands by withdrawing from acquisition.
10.3. Pursuant to the directions issued by the Division
Bench and further modified directions issued by the Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, representations
have been submitted by several owners of the land contending
interalia that their claim would fall within the four corners of
the said directions. The said representations having been
considered by the BDA and having rejected, land owners have
filed writ petitions.
10.4 Whereas, few writ petitions like W.P.No.638/2014
have been filed challenging the acquisition proceedings
culminating in issuance of the Final Notification dated
18.06.2014 contending interalia that acquisition is deemed to
have lapsed under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation

604
and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short ‘ New LA Act’) on account of
possession having not been taken.
10.5 Yet, few writ petitions have been filed by land
owners for deletion of their respective lands on the ground of
further directions issued in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case
would enure to their benefit. In other words, they have sought
to raise a plea that on account of lands adjacent to the lands
owned by them having been deleted, the land owned by them
has become landlocked.
SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTIONS RAISED:
11. It is contended that representations submitted by
the land owners had been considered under Section 17(5) of
the BDA Act and a Notification under Section 19 of the said
Act came to be issued, which is bad in law since acquisition
proceedings have already been upheld by this court and the
Hon’ble Apex Court and BDA has been directed only to
consider the representation and as such, there was no need or
necessity for issuance of Notification dated 18.06.2014 once
again under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act. It is also contended

605
that Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case has
directed the BDA to consider the representations of the land
owners as to discrimination meted out to similarly placed land
owners and instead of complying with the said direction, BDA
has recommended the Government to denotify several lands
which is contrary to the dicta laid down by Hon’ble Apex
Court. It is also contended that Second Final Notification (for
short ‘SFN’) dated 18.06.2014 is without authority of law , as
BDA Act does not provide for the same and it has been issued
under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which has been
repealed. It is also contended that SFN has been issued
without application of mind. Elaborating on this, it is
contended that under SFN, 1766.05 guntas of land have been
sought to be acquired and approximately, 500 acres of
Government land has been wrongly notified which includes ‘B’
kharab lands. It is contended that Government has not
passed any order under Section 97 of the Karnataka Land
Revenue Act to divert ‘B’ kharab land for formation of a
Layout. Moreover, 20,000 sites are sought to be formed in an
area of 2750 acres initially and on account of reduction in the
extent namely, confining the acquisition to 1766.05 acres, it
would indicate that scheme cannot be implemented, as most of

606
the said lands are tank bed, gomala etc. wherein Layout
cannot be formed. It is also contended that Section 503-C of
Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 by which
Planning Authority is constituted, the Bangalore Metropolitan
Planning Authority ( for short BMPA) is required to draw a
scheme for Bangalore Metropolitan Area and State cannot
exercise the power of BMPA by issuing the impugned
Notification.
11.1 Yet other forceful argument which has been
canvassed relates to the lands which are sought to be acquired
is landlocked and/or similarly placed as that of lands which
have been denotified. As such, there is hostile discrimination.
11.2 It is further contended that Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case has clearly held that Layout
cannot be formed by BDA in bits and pieces or in scattered
Layouts, inasmuch as, continuous Layout cannot be formed
and as such, Notification is liable to be set aside. It is further
submitted that SFN is hit by the provisions of New LA Act and
on account of award having not been passed pursuant to the
SFN and possession of lands having not been taken,

607
acquisition proceedings are deemed to have been lapsed. It is
also contended that neither award amount is paid nor
deposited and as such, acquisition proceedings have lapsed.
11.3 It is further contended that erstwhile land owners
have formed revenue Layout prior to Preliminary Notification
and therefore they ought to have been served with a notice of
acquisition and in the absence thereof, it has to be necessarily
held as acquisition having been lapsed. Drawing the attention
of court to the photographs produced along with writ petitions,
it is contended that there are residential buildings constructed
by petitioners in the lands in question and they are in
existence since long and as such, acquisition of such lands
cannot be proceeded with. They have further contended that
Land Acquisition Officers (for short LAO) have themselves
recommended for exclusion of lands in their reports, which
has not been considered and same have been included in SFN.
11.4 Learned advocates appearing for petitioners have
contended that BDA has issued different and inconsistent
endorsements after considering the representations of the
petitioners. They would contend that sketch issued by one

608
LAO would depict the area as deleted, which has been changed
by another LAO depicting that same has been acquired. On
account of scheme having not been implemented under
Section 27, it is deemed to have lapsed since within five (5)
years from the date of first Final Notification dated 23.02.2004,
the scheme has not been implemented.
11.5 For the purposes of convenience, contentions
raised in some of the writ petitions including the common
contentions referred to herein above are enumerated below:
W.P.No.51929/2014 & Connected Matters:
12. Preliminary Notification under section 17(3) of BDA
Act for acquisition of 3339 acres of land in the 16 villages
aforestated for formation of Arkavati Layout came to be issued
on 03.02.2003 and subsequently, on 16.09.2003 modified
Preliminary Notification was issued proposing thereunder to
acquire 3839 acres 12 guntas in the said 16 villages. After
issuance of notice under Section 17(5) of BDA Act and on
receipt of objections, BDA resolved to delete 1089 acres 12
guntas land and sought for sanction/approval of the scheme
for 2750 acres of land and submitted the proposal to the

609
appropriate Government which in turn, sanctioned the scheme
under Section 18(3) of the BDA Act. It is thereafter Final
Notification dated 23.02.2004 came to be issued for acquiring
2750 acres of land situated in the aforestated 16 villages.
After conducting an enquiry, award is said to have been
passed to an extent of 1618.38 acres and possession claims to
have been taken in respect of 1459.37 acres of private land
and 459.16 acres of Government land, thus in all, 1919.13
acres of land has been acquired for formation of the Layout. It
is also stated that BDA has formed a Layout by laying or
forming 14103 plots apart from constructing roads, culverts,
drains, etc. however, said Notifications both Preliminary and
Final were under challenge before this court in various writ
petitions and said writ petitions came to be allowed by order
dated 15.04.2005 (in W.P.Nos.26601-04/2004 and connected
matters (reported in ILR 2005 KAR 3710)) and acquisition
proceedings initiated by BDA came to be quashed. As already
noticed herein above, Division Bench in W.A.Nos.2624-
25/2005 by order dated 25.11.2005 allowed the writ appeals,
set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge
upholding the scheme subject to conditions/directions issued
thereunder. Directions/ order of Division Bench of this Court

610
came to be affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case referred to supra. Hon’ble Apex Court in
the directions/clarification issued has made it explicitly clear
that any allotment made by BDA either by forming a Layout or
by way of bulk allotments would be subject to such directions
and clarification issued.
12.1 Subsequent to order/directions issued by Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, State Government
has issued a Notification dated 18.03.2011 declaring that land
owners are entitled to plots in the ratio of 40:60 namely, 40%
to land owners and 60% to BDA after deducting the land
utilised for civic amenities, parks, roads, drainages, culverts,
etc. In the light of directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court, it
was to the effect that acquisition of lands in Kempapura and
Srirampura is concerned, BDA should reconsider objections to
the acquisition having regard to the fact that large areas were
not initially notified for acquisition and more than 50% of
whatever that was notified for acquisition, was also
subsequently deleted from acquisition. BDA has to consider
whether in view of deletion to a large extent, development with
respect to balance of the acquired lands has become illogical

611
and impractical and if so, whether balance area also should be
deleted from acquisition. It was further directed that if BDA
still proposes to continue the acquisition, it shall file a report
within four (4) months before the High Court so that
consequential orders can be passed. Insofar as villages of
Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where
there are small pockets of acquired lands surrounded by
lands, which were not acquired or which were deleted from the
proposed acquisition, BDA may consider whether such small
pockets should also be deleted if they are not suitable for
forming self contained Layouts since acquisition thereof
cannot be justified on the ground that these small islands of
acquired land, could be used as a stand-alone park or
playground in regard to a Layout formed in different
unconnected lands in other villages. Similar isolated pockets
in other villages should also be dealt with in a similar manner.
As such, observing/clarifying these aspects, directions came to
be issued by Hon’ble Apex Court that BDA should give option
to each of the writ petitioners whose lands have been acquired
for the Arkavati Layout to accept allotment for 15% of the land
acquired from him by way of developed plots in lieu of
compensation, any fractions in excess of 15% may be charged

612
at prevailing rates of allotment or where extent of land
acquired exceeds half an acre, to claim in addition to
compensation (without prejudice to seek reference, if he is not
satisfied with the quantum), allotment of a plot measuring 30’
x 40’ for every half acre of land acquired at the prevailing
allotment price and accordingly, directed BDA to undertake
such exercise. It is in this background, BDA is said to have
conducted an enquiry through Land Acquisition Officers by
receiving various applications/representations filed by the
applicants and after conducting such enquiry, has placed
report before the Board of BDA, who in turn has approved the
report and scaled down or reduced the extent of acquisition of
the lands for formation of Arkavati Layout to 1760 acres of
land by deleting yet another 983 acres 33 guntas of land. The
appropriate Government after having perused the said
proposal, is said to have approved and re-modified the scheme
and accordingly, impugned Notification has been issued for
formation for Arkavati Layout.
W.P.30731/2014:
13. It is the contention of Mr. Bharath Kumar V.,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that order passed

613
by this court on 17.10.2017 calling upon BDA to produce the
original records to establish the fact that land in question has
been acquired, Layout has been formed and sites have been
allotted to the applicants and BDA has failed to produce the
records. Hence, he prays that an adverse inference may be
drawn in favour of petitioner and against the BDA.
13.1 He would also submit that the land which is the
subject matter of present writ petition would fall within the
parameters prescribed by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case namely, on all the three sites, lands
which were also proposed to be acquired has been de-notified
on account of said land being fully developed, as such land
belonging to the petitioner is a land locked. Hence, he prays
for acquisition insofar as the petitioner’s land is concerned to
be quashed.
13.2 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned counsel
appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 would defend the
acquisition proceedings.
614
W.P.No.36525/2016:
14. Petitioners claim to be the owners of land bearing
Sy.No.1/1 measuring 25 guntas situated at Ammanibyrathi
Kane Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
14.1 Petitioners claim title to the property under
registered sale deed dated 20.05.1946 and subsequent
partition on 15.10.1982. It is the contention of Sri T Seshagiri
Rao, learned Advocate appearing for petitioners that entire
area is built up and hence, they would fall within the
parameters fixed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. It is also contended that it is a patta
land. Revenue records would also indicate that same has not
been mutated to the names of petitioners and it continues to
reflect the name of Government as owner of the land. On
these grounds, they have sought for deletion of their land from
acquisition. They would also rely upon the photographs
produced to contend that entire surrounding area is built up.
W.P. No. 35204/2014:
15. Petitioners are claiming to be the owners of sites
formed out of Survey No.97/2 of Jakkur Village having

615
purchased the same in the year 1999 and contending that on
08.05.1999 itself the land was converted for non-
agricultural/residential purposes. It is submitted by the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that after
purchasing the sites petitioners have put up structures
namely, residential building as evident from the photographs
produced at Annexures – B1 and B6 and C1 and C9 and katha
is also mutated in the respective names of petitioners and
taxes are being collected and when this was the factual
position, out of blue Preliminary and Final Notification came to
be issued proposing to acquire the said lands and petitioner
has submitted that on account of property having been build
up, dicta laid down by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case would be squarely applicable. As such he
prays for allowing the writ petition.
W.P.No.37446/2014:
16. It is contended that scheduled sites are formed out
of composite land bearing original Sy.Nos.103/1, 103/2,
103/3, 103/4, 103/5 at Rachenahalli Village in which Sy.No.3
was converted way back on 17.07.1992 and petitioners have
put up construction and lands in question are landlocked

616
lands and as such, it would fall within four corners of
directions/clarification issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at paragraph 160(ii) and as such
continuation of acquisition of sites in question would be
contrary to the directions issued by the Apex Court. Hence, he
seeks for allowing the petition and quashing of proceedings.
16.1 Per contra, Sri. Bipin Hegde, learned counsel
appearing for respondents would support the acquisition
proceedings and prays for dismissal of the petition. He would
also reiterate the grounds urged in the statement of objections
and would contend that award has been passed and
possession of land has been taken over by BDA and handed
over to Engineering Section and BDA has formed a Layout and
there has been substantial implementation of the scheme.
Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.
16.2 Though, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner
has contended that lands in question are the lands which have
already been deleted and relies upon the Layout plan
(Annexure-D). For the present, it cannot be relied upon and it
is neither counter signed by any statutory authorities nor they

617
would indicate as to survey numbers in which sites have been
formed or carved out. As to whether the sites in question
would form part of Sy.No.103/4 of Rachenahalli village is
disputed question of fact which cannot be called into in writ
jurisdiction.
16.3 Elaborating his submission, learned Advocate
appearing for petitioner would contend that on all the three
sides of Sy.No.103/4, lands which were proposed for
acquisition have been deleted and as such, land in
Sy.No.103/4 is to be construed as an island as indicated in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and as such, petitioner is
entitled for deletion of said land from acquisition.
16.4 Per contra, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent-BDA would contend that possession of
Sy.No.103/4 has been taken and sites have been formed and
24 sites have been formed out of which six (6) sites have
already been allotted by relying upon document produced
along with I.A.No.1/2019.

618
W.P.No.38463/2014:
17. Petitioners claim to be the owners of Site No.9
carved out of Sy.No.141/1 of Challakere Village, K.R.Puram
Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, having purchased the same
under registered sale deed dated 27.02.2013 from
Sri.M.C.Narayanaswamy, who had purchased from Sri.C.Santa
Maria under a registered sale deed dated 17.03.2004 –
Annexures-A and B respectively. It is the grievance of
petitioners that said property had been purchased by them for
putting up residential building and accordingly, they have
constructed residential building which has since been
demolished by BDA. It is the grievance of petitioners that their
claim has not been considered in terms of law laid down by
Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case. Hence, petitioners have sought for quashing of Final
Notification dated 23.02.2004 – Annexure-F and Notification
dated 18.06.2014 – Annexure-G on the ground that said
Notifications are illegal.
17.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent Nos. - 2 and 3 would support the
acquisition proceedings and contends that petitioner is not

619
entitled for any of the relief sought for, inasmuch as, they were
not notified khatedars; no application was filed for registering
their names as directed by Division Bench of this Court and
construction of the house has come up subsequent to
Preliminary Notification. On these grounds, respondent Nos.-2
and 3 have sought for dismissal of the petition.
17.2 It is an undisputed fact that petitioner had
purchased the property in question on 27.02.2013 i.e.,
subsequent to Preliminary and Final Notification issued by the
BDA. Petitioners have not submitted any representation to
BDA. Even in the absence of their claim of BDA having not
considered their plea, in the background of Division Bench
judgment and BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case will have to be
considered.
W.P.No.39832/2014:
18. Petitioner claims to be the owner of lands bearing
Sy.Nos.129/2, 133/1, 133/2 & 133/3 measuring 25 guntas,
32 guntas, 6 guntas and 5 guntas respectively situated at
Challakere village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
He has questioned acquisition Notification relating to Arkavati

620
Layout. Undisputedly, challenge to said Notification has
reached Finality before Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Pursuant to same, petitioner is
said to have submitted representation and endorsement dated
07.01.2011 came to be issued by BDA, which was questioned
by petitioners in W.P.Nos.7049-7052/2011. Claim of the
petitioner have not been considered in the light of directions
and observations made by Hon’ble Apex Court in paragraph
160 of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case referred to supra, Co-
ordinate Bench quashed the same by order dated 01.02.2012
passed in said writ petitions and directed respondent–BDA to
re-consider the representation/application submitted by
petitioner for deletion of his land from acquisition.
18.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that said
representation having been submitted on 27.06.2014, without
considering the same, subsequent Notification has been
issued. Hence, petitioner is seeking for quashing of
Notification.
621
18.2 Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner has
reiterated the contentions raised and grounds urged in the writ
petitions.
18.3 Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent-BDA would draw the attention of the Court to
Annexures-R1 to R8 produced along with statement of
objections to contend that except sporadic constructions
having been put-up in the lands acquired, major portion of the
land has been lying vacant as per the mahazar drawn and
possession of said land has been taken way back in the year
2004 itself. It is also contended that sites have already been
formed in the said lands and as such, he prays for dismissal of
the petitions.
W.P.No.43815/2014:
19. Petitioner claims to be the owner of property
bearing Site No.206. The said site has been carved out of
Sy.Nos.45/1, 45/6, 48/1, 48/2, 54 and 47 of Dasarahalli
village measuring East to West 81.6 feet and North to South 48
feet. He is seeking for quashing of the Notification dated
18.06.2014 insofar as his property is concerned.

622
19.1 It is the contention of Sri. Narayana Rao H.R,
learned Advocate appearing for petitioner that said site has
been formed by the vendor of petitioner after obtaining
conversion order of said land and pursuant to purchase, she
has put up construction over the property and residing therein
after obtaining electricity and water connection from the
statutory authorities and as such khata is also made out and
revenue records have been mutated in the name of petitioner
in the records of BBMP and as such, at this length of time, if
the property is acquired, she would be put to hardship as it is
the only property which is available to her. He would also
elaborate his submission by contending that entire property,
which petitioner had purchased, has been safeguarded by
putting up compound wall and it is in her possession and
enjoyment and as such, he seeks for quashing of the
impugned Notification. He would also contend that the
adjacent properties are fully developed and there is no land left
for BDA to make any development pursuant to this scheme.
19.2 Per contra, learned counsel appearing for BDA has
supported the acquisition insofar as Sy.Nos.45/1, 45/6, 48/1,

623
48/2, 54 and 47 of Dasarahalli village. It is also contended
that petitioner is a subsequent purchaser and as such she has
no locus standi to file a petition. He would reiterate the
grounds urged in the statement of objections by contending
that all schemes have been implemented insofar as
Dasarahalli village is concerned and as such question of
granting any relief to the petitioner does not arise as
petitioner’s case would not fall within the parameter laid down
by the Division Bench and as affirmed and modified by the
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he
prays for rejection of the petition.
19.3 Having heard the learned counsel appearing for
petitioner and respondents, it would emerge from the very
Notification that undisputedly, petitioner has purchased the
property in the year 2004 i.e., under sale deed dated
17.9.2004 and Preliminary Notification came to be issued on
03.02.2003 followed by Final Notification dated 23.02.2004.
Thus, petitioner having purchased the property on 17.09.2004,
which is subsequent to Notification dated 23.02.2004 and
before Notification dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure-A), the only
issue which would required to be considered is as to what

624
relief the petitioner would be entitled to in the background of
parameters fixed by the Division Bench of this Court as
affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case whereunder clarification and further directions came to
be issued.
W.P.Nos.44306/2014:
20. In these writ petitions, petitioners who are claiming
to be the purchasers of sites from Talakaveri Housing
Cooperative Building Society are contending interalia that they
have purchased the sites under registered sale deeds and said
sale deeds have come into existence prior to impugned
Notifications.
20.1 Sri.B.M.Halaswamy, learned counsel appearing for
petitioners would also elaborate his submission by contending
that land measuring 8 acres was converted and a
memorandum of understanding was entered into between the
then land owner - Sri. K. Gundu Rao along with Talakaveri
Housing Cooperative Building Society, pursuant to which
conversion of land was obtained and sites came to be formed
by the Society and sale deeds were executed on behalf of

625
Sri.Gundu Rao by Talakaveri Housing Cooperative Building
Society.
20.2 He would submit that BDA had recognized sale
deeds executed in favour of allottees till death of Sri.Gundu
Rao and subsequent to his death, sale deeds executed have
been not recognized. He would also submit that suit filed by
the deceased Gundu Rao has also been withdrawn and as
such acquisition of lands, insofar, as petitioners are concerned
be dropped in the background of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case
keeping in mind the adjacent land has also been dropped from
the acquisition.
20.3 Per contra, Sri.M.N.Ramanjaneya, learned Standing
Counsel appearing for BDA would submit that petitioners are
only agreement holders and does not have any right over the
property and as such petitioners would not be entitled for the
relief sought for. He would also submit that BDA has formed
Layout in the said 8 acres of land and allotted sites in favour of
applicants and possession also having been delivered, they are
waiting for Lease cum Sale Deeds having been executed in

626
favour of allottees. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ
petition.
W.P.No.46766/2014:
24. Petitioner is the owner of land bearing Survey
No.14/1 situated at Thanisandra Village measuring 1 acre 20
guntas. He is seeking for a writ of mandamus to delete the said
land from acquisition proceedings as it has been included in
Final Notification dated 23.02.2004 Annexure-B.
24.1 It is the contention of Sri.Vikhar Ahmed B., learned
counsel appearing for petitioner that claim of petitioner would
fall within the four corners of paragraph-160(2) of BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case, inasmuch as, lands adjacent and
abutting to petitioner’s land has been denotified by the BDA
namely, Survey No.12/7 on eastern side and remaining
portion of Survey Nos.14/1 and 66/6. Hence, he seeks for land
belonging to petitioner also being set aside.
24.2 Per contra, Sri K.Krishna, learned counsel
appearing for respondent-BDA seeks for dismissal of writ
petition on the ground that lands abutting to petitioner’s land
namely, Survey Nos.13 and 14/2 on northern and southern
sides respectively are acquired, possession taken, sites carved
out and as such, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

627
24.3 Having heard learned Advocates counsel appearing
for parties and on perusal of records, it requires to be noticed
that in the instant case, undisputedly petitioner was also a
party to earlier round of proceedings. Division Bench while
disposing of writ appeal on 25.11.2005 granting succor to land
owners at paragraph-106(D)(i), gave liberty to applicants to
submit appropriate applications to the authorities seeking
such exclusion and exemption from acquisition by producing
documents to substantiate their contentions within one month
from the date of that order and indicating thereunder that they
would be at liberty to demonstrate that their lands are situated
within green belt area or they are totally built up or properties
where there are buildings constructed by Charitable,
Educational and Religious Institutions or nursery lands or who
have set up factories or their lands are similar to the lands,
which are adjoining the lands but not notified for acquisition
at all. Undisputedly, petitioner did not submit any application
or representation to the BDA. However, now petitioner is
attempting to take umbrage on account of matter pending
before the Hon’ble Apex Court, even though no application was
filed before BDA as ordered by Division Bench. Even
otherwise, the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s

628
case which came to be disposed of on 05.05.2010, as already
noticed hereinabove, apart from confirming/affirming the
judgment of learned Single Judge and affirming acquisition
proceedings had also further clarified that BDA can consider
whether small pockets of acquired lands and surrounded
lands, which are not acquired for the purposes of deletion are
not suitable for forming self contained Layout. Hence, said
benefit was extended to those persons namely, owners of lands
to pursue their grievances before the BDA by submitting
representations and BDA was directed to consider such
representations in accordance with direction issued by the
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Pursuant
to same, BDA has undertaken exercise of redoing the whole
issue namely, examining claim of land owners. At that point of
time also, there was no representation submitted by petitioner
or representation, if any, filed earlier was pending. Hence, no
fault can be found on the BDA in this regard. However, it is
seen in many instances, that BDA in compliance of direction
issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case, suo motu has undertaken exercise to delete certain lands
on the premise that it would fall within the parameters fixed
either by the Division Bench or by the Hon’ble Apex Court

629
clarified in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and accordingly, in
many instances, it has dropped lands from acquisition or in
other words, lands which were proposed to be acquired under
Notification dated 23.02.2004 came to be deleted. It is
thereafter Notification dated 18.06.2014 came to be issued.
Even immediately thereafter or within a reasonable period,
petitioner did not make any representation. In other words,
petitioner can be termed as a fence-sitter or who had slept over
his right, if any and without seeking for deletion of land
included in Notification dated 18.06.2014, still petitioner is
clinging to Notification dated 23.02.2004, which has got
eclipsed by virtue of Notification dated 18.06.2014.
W.P.No.47107/2014:
25. Petitioner claims to be the Khatedar of the land
bearing Survey No.61/3 of Amruthahalli Village, Yelahanka
Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, measuring 10 guntas. It is
contended that said land is bounded on the east by
Sy.No.61/4, west by Sy.No.61/3, north by Sy.No.38 and south
by Sy.No.62. It is contended in the SFN dated 18.06.2014 first
respondent has excluded Sy.No.61/4 and 62/1, which were
vacant agricultural lands as on the date Preliminary
Notification dated 23.02.2004 (Annexure-A) was issued and

630
though petitioner's land had been developed even prior to
Preliminary Notification and were entitled to be treated on par
with the lands excluded from acquisition namely, Sy.No.61/4
and 62/1, same benefit has not been extended to the
petitioners. Thus, contending that there is discrimination
between two (2) similarly placed persons and Division Bench
judgment as well as dicta laid in BONDU RAMASWAMY's have
not been correctly applied to the claim of petitioner, he has
sought for quashing of Final Notification dated 18.06.2014
(Annexure-C). Contending that there is clause discrimination
between 2 person who are equally placed, challenge to the
impugned notification is laid. It is also contended that lands
belonging to the Government, which had been reserved for
public purposes have not been declassified as required under
Section 97 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act namely, there
is no order passed for diversion of the said lands. It is also
contended that non alienable 'B' kharab lands are also wrongly
notified for acquisition and hence, acquisition has to be set
aside. These amongst other grounds, urged in the connected
writ petitions and reiterating the same petitioner has sought
for writ petition being allowed.

631
25.1 Per contra, Sri.G.Lakshmeesha Rao, learned
counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has reiterated
the averments made in the statement of objections and
adopting the arguments addressed by Sri.Nanjunda Reddy,
learned Senior Counsel who has appeared on behalf of BDA,
he prays for dismissal of the petition.
W.P.Nos.47608/2014
26. Petitioners claims to be the purchasers of sites 157,
157A - Annexures –A and A1 respectively carved out of
Sy.No.45/6 of Dasarahalli Village. It is contended that in the
light of direction issued by the Division Bench that BDA is
required to examine the claim of petitioners.
26.1 Though Sri. K. Krishna, learned counsel appearing
for BDA is justified in contending that petitioners have not got
registered themselves for considering their request, fact
remains that under similar circumstances even where the
applicants were the revenue sites holders had approached this
Court in the earlier round of litigation or having not submitted
the representations, have been directed by this Court to
consider the claim of applicants in the teeth of directions
issued by the Division Bench and as such, it requires to be
examined as to whether petitioners would also be entitled to

632
similar reliefs or any other relief though claim of petitioners for
deletion of lands insofar as sites purchased by them concerned
would not hold water.
W.P.No.47731/2014:
27. It is the contention of the petitioner that he is the
owner of the land measuring 1 acre 37 guntas in Survey
No.72/2 of Thanisandra Village having acquired the same by
way of succession.
27.1 Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that
petitioner has constructed a house as reflected in Annexure-H
and they are residing therein. Neither the Preliminary
Notification nor Final Notification or the modified Notification
reflected the correct name of petitioner and as such, petitioner
had no notice of the acquisition proceedings till 2014. He
would submit that the adjacent properties which were allotted
to the shares of his brothers have been left out from the
acquisition, as they are built up area and all the three sites of
the petitioner’s property the buildings have coming up, as
such the judgment of Apex Court rendered in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case would be squarely applicable to
petitioner’s claim and hence he prays for land bearing Survey

633
No.72/2 measuring 1 acre 37 guntas be dropped from the
acquisition proceedings.
27.2 Per contra, Sri M.B. Prabhakar, learned counsel
appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 would support the
Notification and he would adopt the arguments addressed by
Sri B.N. Nanjundareddy, learned Senior Counsel who had
appeared on behalf of the BDA.
W.P.No.48880/2014:
28. Heard Sri.Somashekhar, learned Advocate
appearing for petitioner. Respondents are served and
unrepresented. No statement of objections has been filed.
28.1 Petitioner who claims to be the owner of 0.5¼
guntas of land in Sy.No.85/3 situated at Amruthahalli,
Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk is seeking for deletion
of said extent of land from Final Notification contending
interalia that on three sides of land in question namely,
Sy.Nos.86, 84 and 115 situated on the northern, eastern and
southern sides have been deleted and as such, there is no
reason for the BDA to continue with the acquisition of land
insofar as land owned by the petitioners. Hence, contending
that further directions and clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex
Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at paragraph 160 would

634
squarely be applicable to the case of petitioners, he prays for
deletion of land from acquisition.
28.2 The working plan insofar as Amruthahalli village
furnished by learned Advocate appearing for BDA in the
connected matters would disclose that to the north of
Sy.No.85/3, land bearing Sy.No.84 has been deleted, on the
eastern side, Sy.No.86 (portion) has been deleted and even on
the southern side, there is ‘nala’, above which, there is vacant
space, which is also not included in the acquisition
proceedings. Therefore, on all the three sides of Sy.No.85/3
namely, north, east and south lands as referred to herein
above has not been acquired by BDA.
28.3 In the impugned order (Annexure-F), consideration
seems to have been made by BDA pursuant to the direction
issued by the Division Bench of this Court and not in the light
of clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. In fact, there is no reference to the
judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the impugned
endorsement. There is no statement of objections filed by BDA
indicating that said exercise was undertaken by BDA to
examine claim of the petitioner.

635
W.P. No.51294/2014:
29. Respondent No.9 is claiming right over the site
No.198, which is said to have been purchased by him from the
erstwhile owner Smt.Saroja under registered Sale Deed dated
20.12.2014 formed out of Survey No.82/2/14 of Thanisandra
Village, contending inter alia that said Saroja was the owner of
land bearing Survey No.35/2 of Thanisandra Village,
measuring 1 acre 1 ½ guntas and in view of she giving up her
right to the said land, which was acquired by the BDA for
formation of Arkavati Layout under the extract scheme
operating, she has been allotted the site wherein site bearing
No. Survey No.198, which has since been sold by her to the 9th
respondent, as such acquisition of land bearing Survey
No.82/2/14 by the BDA is justified and hence, he has prayed
for dismissal of the petition.
W.P.No.52760/2014:
30. Petitioners who own property bearing Sy.No.13/3A
measuring 22 guntas situated at Jakkur village, Yelahanka
Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk are before this Court with a
prayer to delete said land from acquisition.

636
30.1 It is the contention of petitioners that said land is
surrounded by Sy.Nos.13/2, 13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B, which
have not been notified and as such, petitioners claim would
fall within the parameters of clarification/direction issued by
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case vide
paragraph 160(ii).
30.2 Per contra, Sri.K.Krishna, learned Advocate
appearing on behalf of Sri.M.B.Prabhakar for respondent-BDA
would support the action of respondent in acquiring the land
in question and by reiterating the grounds urged in the
statement of objections, he would contend that possession of
land has been taken, sites have been formed and as such,
considering the claim of petitioners for deletion of land in
question would be inappropriate, he prays for dismissal of the
petition.
W.P.No.54358/2014:
31. Petitioners claim to be the owners of 18 guntas of
land situated in Sy.No.81/3B of Rachenahalli village,
K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk. They have sought for
quashing of acquisition proceedings under impugned
Notification dated 18.06.2014.

637
31.1 It is the contention of Sri.N.Sonnegowda, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioners that though petitioners’
names were mutated in the revenue records, none of the
impugned Notifications reflected their names. He would also
submit that land in question measures about 18 guntas and is
an isolated pocket surrounded by land bearing Sy.Nos.81/2A,
81/2B, 82 , 83/1, 81/3A, 84/2 and portion of 81/3B, which
lands have been excluded and respondent – BDA by pick and
choose method has sought to acquire land in question
belonging to the petitioners and as such, he has sought for
said land being dropped from the acquisition proceedings. He
would also draw the attention of Court to paragraph 160(ii) of
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case to contend that claim of
petitioner would fall within four corners of the said
directions/clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex Court.
31.2 It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing
for respondent-BDA that 28 sites have been formed in said
land and 8 sites have been allotted.
31.3 Perusal of the working plan and plan approved by
the Commissioner-BDA, insofar, as it relates to Rachenahalli
village, it would disclose that land measuring 18 guntas in

638
Sy.No.81/3B, which is sought to be acquired, is bounded on
east by Sy.Nos.81/2A & 81/2B, west by halla and Sy.No.82 &
83/1, north by Sy.No.81/3B (excluded major portion) and
84/2 and south by Sy.No.81/3A and all these three lands have
been notified for acquisition.
W.P.No.56748/2014:
32. Learned counsel appearing for BDA has furnished
details of the sites formed in the Arkavati Layout, which is
village vice and in respect of the same, it has depicted the
number of sites formed. However, details of sites are not
forthcoming. For instance in Thanisandra village bearing
Sy.Nos.1/1 to 14/1 the details of the sites formed is not
forthcoming. However, in respect of Sy.No.17/5 (subject
matter of W.P.No.56748-775/2014) BDA claims to have formed
sites bearing Sy.Nos.403 to 409, 410 to 413, 416 to 426, 385,
386, 387, 388 and 389. Names of the allottees in respect of
Sy.Nos.410, 413, 416 to 426 are reflected; as to whether these
sites are within the area, which has been constructed or not,
details are not forthcoming. On the other hand, petitioners
claim to have purchased sites and have also contended that
they have constructed residential buildings and are residing
therein and photographs produced at Annexures-D to F, H1

639
would disclose several buildings have come up. BDA by
endorsement dated 18.12.2015 -Annexure-W has also
intimated the Secretary, AAR Employees Society to remit
Rs.1,10,00,000/- towards development charges.
32.1 In that view of the matter, it has been ascertained
by actual examination as to whether the sites which are
sought to be deleted from the acquisition would fall within the
zone of sites already formed by BDA and allotted to third
parties and if there are such allottees, they will have to
necessarily allot alternate sites to such of the allottees.
W.P. No.58829/2014:
33. Sri.M.B.Prabhakar, learned counsel for respondent
Nos.2 and 3 would contend that predecessors in title of
petitioner were parties to the proceedings in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’S case, wherein, the challenge was laid to the
legality of acquisition proceedings of Arkavati Layout and same
having laid to rest, petitioners cannot have any independent
leg to stand and as such, he has prayed for dismissal of the
petition by reiterating the contentions raised in the statement
of objections.
640
W.P.No.18814/2015:
34. Petitioner claims to be the owner of property
bearing Sy.No.94/7 measuring 1 acre situated at Thanisandra,
K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore.
34.1 On account of representation submitted by
petitioner having not been considered, petitioner had
approached this court in W.P.No.23964/2014 and this court
by order dated 28.11.2014 (Annexure-E) directed the
respondent-BDA to consider the said representation.
Pursuant to the same, petitioner submitted one more
representation on 19.12.2014 –Annexure-F, which was
adjudicated by respondent-BDA and issued an endorsement
dated 20.04.2015 rejecting the request of petitioner.
34.2 Photographs produced along with the petition
would indicate that at an undisputed point of time, it was
virgin land. Mahazar produced along with statement of
objections filed by respondent Nos.-1 and 2 would indicate
that possession of the land has been taken on 30.06.2006 and
Notification under Section 16(2) of the Act has been issued.
That apart, sites have been formed and have been allotted to
third parties/allottees. It is submitted by respondent-BDA

641
that land bearing Sy.Nos.94/4B and 95/5 situated on the
northern side of Sy.No.94/7 was not included in the
Notification dated 23.02.2004.
W.P.No.29317/2015:
35. Petitioner claims to be the owner of 16 guntas of
land situated in Sy.No.4/1 of Sampigehalli village, Yelahanka
Hobli, she has sought for quashing of acquisition proceedings
commenced under impugned Notification dated 18.06.2014
and also endorsement dated 20.01.2015–Annexure-A
whereunder prayer of the petitioner for deleting land in
question from acquisition has been turned down by BDA.
35.1 It is the contention of Sri.Y.S.Vedhkumar, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioner that though petitioner’s
name was mutated in the revenue records, none of the
impugned Notifications reflected her name. He would also
submit that land in question measures about 16 guntas and is
an isolated pocket surrounded by land Sy.Nos.4/2, 5/2, 4/1
which lands have not been acquired and yet, respondent –
BDA by pick and choose method has sought to acquire land in
question belonging to the petitioner and as such, he has
sought for said land being dropped from the acquisition

642
proceedings. He would also draw the attention of court to
paragraph 160(ii) of BONDU RAMASWAMY reported in to
contend that claim of petitioner would fall within four corners
of the said directions/clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex
Court.
35.2 Perusal of working plan and plan approved by the
Commissioner, BDA, insofar as it relates to Sampigehalli
village, would disclose that land measuring 16 guntas in
Sy.No.4/1 which is sought to be acquired, is indicated as
reserved for civil amenity and said land is bounded on East by
Sy.No.4/2, South by Sy.No.5/2, West by Sy.No.4/1 and
thereafter by Sy.No.6/1 and all these three lands have not
been notified for acquisition.
W.P.No.29541/2015:
36. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus being
issued to BDA for executing sale deed pursuant to allotment
made.
36.1 Petitioners were applicants before respondent-BDA,
who had filed applications seeking allotment of sites formed in
Arkavati Layout. Pursuant to said application, petitioners
were allotted site No.71 in Block No.7 and Sy.No.829 in Block

643
No.11, Arkavati Layout measuring 50’ x 80’ and 30’ x 40’ vide
allotment letters dated 24.06.2006 and 30.12.2005 -
Annexures-A and B respectively. Pursuant to same, entire site
value is said to have been deposited by the petitioners. On
account of non-execution of sale deed or delivering possession,
petitioners have approached this court seeking a writ of
mandamus to direct respondent-BDA to register the sale deeds
in respect of sites allotted to them.
36.2 On respondents being notified, statement of
objections have been filed stating that under re-do exercise
carried out by BDA pursuant to decision of Hon’ble Apex Court
in BONDU RAMASWAMY, large number of sites are being held
up or lands have been deleted and as such about 3000 sites
have been reserved for being allotted to the allottees in another
Layout “Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout”. Hence,
respondent-BDA has stated that petitioners have been allotted
site Nos. B9-SC-2201 and B5-SF-2137 to petitioners as per the
allotment letters dated 09.11.2017 (Annexures-R2 and R3).
Hence, they contend that present prayer sought for in the writ
petitions has become infructuous.

644
37. Though stand of respondent-BDA appeals to logic,
fact remains that even in respect of sites which have been
allotted, there is no whisper with regard to Lease-cum-Sale
Agreement or absolute sale deed having not been executed in
favour of petitioners. As such, respondent - BDA is directed to
take immediate steps in this regard to execute Lease-cum-Sale
Agreement and petitioners shall approach BDA for redressal of
their grievance in that regard. In the event of such
application/representation is filed, BDA shall consider the
same and take steps expeditiously, at any rate, within an outer
limit of three months from the date of receipt of such
representations.
W.P.Nos.30781/2015:
38. Petitioner who is claiming to be the owner of land
bearing Sy.No.2/5 measuring 1 acre 27 guntas situated at
Thanisandra village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk is
seeking for deletion of said land from acquisition.
38.1 Working map/plan produced by the BDA would
disclose that on the north and south of land bearing
Sy.No.2/5, it is bounded by Sy.Nos.2/4 and 2/B, which have
not been notified for acquisition, on the eastern side there is a

645
road and thereafter land bearing Sy.No.11/1, which is also
notified for acquisition and on the western side, Sy.No.1/1 is
situated and same is also not notified for acquisition. Hence,
it is the contention of learned Advocate appearing for petitioner
that claim of the petitioner would fall within the parameters of
paragraph 160(ii) of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and
petitioner is entitled for deletion/dropping of his land from
acquisition.
W.P.No.35055/2015:
issued to BDA for executing sale deed pursuant to allotment
made.
W.P.No.47820/2015:
40. In this writ petition the dispute relates to the
property bearing Sy.No.65/5 measuring 2 acres 2 guntas out
of which 1 acre has sought to be acquired located at
Dasarahalli Village.
41. Sri. Shashikiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for petitioner would reiterate the arguments
advanced in W.P.No.47822/2015 and he would rely upon the
judgment rendered in W.P.No.47819/2015 on 19.08.2017 by

646
the Coordinate, Bench which has been annexed to file on
26.05.2018.
W.P.No.47822/2015:
42. The Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case while affirming the judgment of Division Bench had
issued further directions and clarification. Insofar as present
case is concerned, it would suffice to take note of the direction
No.(ii) issued under Paragraph 160, which reads as under:
“(ii). In regard to villages of

Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and
Challakere where there are several very small
pockets of acquired lands surrounded by lands
which were not acquired or which were deleted
from the proposed acquisition, BDA may
consider whether such small pockets should
also be deleted if they are not suitable for
forming self-contained Layouts. The acquisition
thereof cannot be justified on the ground that
these small islands of acquired land, could be
used as a stand-alone park or playground in
regard to a Layout formed in a different
unconnected lands in other villages. Similar
isolated pockets in other villages should also be
dealt with in a similar manner.”
43. It is a specific case of Sri. Shashikiran Shetty,
learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that
property bearing Sy.No.54/1A measuring 25 guntas owned by
petitioners was sought to be acquired to an extent of 12.5
guntas and initially under the Preliminary Notification dated

647
03.02.2003 other adjacent Survey numbers were also
proposed to be acquired and same was notified in the Final
Notification dated 23.02.2004, which was subsequently revised
pursuant to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case rendered by Hon’ble
Apex Court and as such revised Notification dated 18.06.2014
came to be issued whereunder an extent of 12.5 guntas in
Sy.No.54/1A alone was sought to be acquired or dropped from
the acquisition. Hence, contendig that perusal of directions
issued by Hon’ble Apex Court or in other words directions
issued by the Division Bench having not been followed by BDA
in its letter and spirit, he seeks for allowing writ petition.
W.P.No.47823/2015:
44. The subject matter of these two petitions are
Sy.Nos.103/3 and 103/4 situated at Nagawara village
measuring 9 and 10 guntas respectively. They are bounded on
east by Sy.No.103/5, west by Sy.No.102/2 north by
Sy.No.103/2 and south by Sy.No.102/5.
44.1 Insofar as Sy.No.103/5 is concerned, same has not
been notified for acquisition likewise Sy.No.103/2. However,
Sy.No.102/2 on the western side which was initially notified,
and subsequently came to be dropped from acquisition after
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Thus, in respect of this

648
composite property Sy.Nos.103/3 and 103/4, which is
surrounded by Sy.No.103/5 on the eastern side, Sy.No.102/2
on the western side, Sy.No.103/2 on the northern side and
Sy.No.102/5 on the southern side, are either not the subject
matter of acquisition or it has been deleted. Thus, prima facie
it would fall within the four corners of directions issued by the
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAAMASWAMY’s case at
paragraph 160(ii).
W.P.No.47827/2015:
45. Sri. Shashikiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for petitioner would reiterate the arguments
advanced in W.P.No.47822/2015 and submits that claims of
the petitioner would fall within the parameter laid down by
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at
paragraph 160(ii).
W.P.No.57992/2015:
46. Heard.
46.1 Petitioner has contended in the petition that he and
his brothers are owners and in possession of the land bearing
Sy.No.117/1 measuring 47 guntas, is seeking for deletion of
said land by quashing Notification dated 18.06.2014 and to re-

649
consider the representation dated 26.11.2013 (Annexure-E),
whereunder he has sought for said land being dropped from
acquisition on the ground that adjacent lands have been
deleted subsequent to the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in
the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.
46.2 It is the contention of Sri. Somashekar, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioner that land in question is
surrounded by Sy.Nos.115 and 116 on the western side,
Sy.No.94 on the eastern side and Sy.No.118 on the northern
side have been dropped/deleted from acquisition and as such,
acquisition of land in question would be contrary to the
directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for allowing the
petition.
46.3 Sri B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent-BDA would reiterate the contentions raised in the
statement of objections and prays for dismissal of the writ
petition.
W.P.No.751/2016:
47. Petitioner is seeking for allotment of an alternate
site contending inter alia that on more than three occasions

650
sites were allotted in favour of petitioner and yet petitioner has
not been able to see the light of day of a site having been
allotted to him.
47.1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
submit that site measuring 30’ x 40’ bearing No.184/E was
allotted on 30.12.2005 pursuant to which Lease-cum-Sale
Agreement executed on 27.06.2008 and Possession Certificate
though issued, BDA did not deliver possession of the site as
site was not available. Hence, on being called upon to execute
a Cancellation Deed, petitioner executed the same on
30.05.2005 prior to which an alternate site bearing No.632
was allotted on 29.12.2014 and Allotment Letter was also
issued on 15.07.2015. However, possession of said site was
also not delivered on the ground that it would fall within the
redo category as ordered by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, a new site bearing No.150 in
Survey No.204 was allotted at Sampigehalli Village, but
unfortunately the CD report disclosed that there was no such
site available.
47.2 Hence, petitioner being left in lurch has sought for
a writ of mandamus being issued to BDA to allot site in favour

651
of petitioner forthwith, as he had got registered himself for
allotment way back in the year 2005 and for the past 16 years
petitioner has been waiting for an allotment of a site. He
would also submit that petitioner was a Government Servant
at the time he applied for allotment and his fond hope of
having a shelter has got shattered on account of laxity
exhibited by the BDA in not allotting the site or allotting a site,
which is not in existence or allotting a site which is in dispute.
Hence, he prays for writ being issued as prayed for in the writ
petition.
47.3 Having regard to the aforesaid facts, we have
perused the case papers and same would disclose that
petitioner had sought for allotment of site from BDA in the
year 2005 under Government Servants category, with a fond
hope of constructing a house and had got himself registered
with the BDA. Petitioner was initially allotted a site in the year
2005, which site did not exist at all and as such he was forced
to execute a Cancellation Deed in respect of site allotted to him
i.e., site No.184/E, as the said site never existed or in other
words, it was not available for possession being delivered to
petitioner. Successive attempts made by the BDA to allot site

652
bearing Nos.632 and 150 did not materialize on account of
these two sites either being in the category of redo category or
CD report reflecting non-availability of the said sites.
47.4 Be that as it may. The fact remains that petitioner
has not been allotted site afresh after the execution of
cancellation deed in respect of site allotted to him. Hence,
petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought for.
W.P.2392/2016:
48. It is the contention of Sri Zulfikar Kumar Shaffi,
learned counsel appearing for petitioner, that property bearing
Survey No.24/1 measuring 22 guntas owned by the petitioner
is a landlocked property namely; on all the three sides i.e., on
the eastern side property bearing Survey No.24/2, on the
western side property bearing Survey Nos.19/1 and 19/2 and
northern side the land bearing Survey Nos.26/5a1 and 26/6 of
petitioner’s property, are all well developed land and said
survey numbers have been de-notified from acquisition. Even
on the southern side of the property belonging to the petitioner
there exists Nagawara Lake and as such proposed acquisition
in respect of petitioner’s land has to be necessarily deleted in
view of law laid down by the Apex Court in BONDU

653
RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for, acquisition insofar
as petitioner’s land is concerned, being quashed.
W.P.No.5446/2016:
issued to respondents to consider the claim of petitioner
contending his allotment as having been made in the year
2006, since similarly situated persons as per the list furnished
under Annexure-A, who were much below the list in the claim
for allotment of sites, had been allotted sites in the year 2006
and as such allotment made on 04.07.2013 was directed to be
considered as an allotment made in the year 2006.
Consequently, petitioner is seeking for resolution dated
23.09.2015 (Annexure-G) and endorsement dated 28.10.2015
(Annexure-H) issued to the petitioner to be quashed.
W.P.No.11295/2016:
50. Petitioner has been allotted a corner site by BDA
and as such learned counsel appearing for petitioner contends
that under the extant Rules of BDA a corner site cannot be
allotted and it is intermediary site, which can be allotted and
as such he has sought for an alternate site, being allotted to
the petitioner. Hence, he prays for a writ of mandamus being

654
issued by directing BDA to consider the representation of
petitioner for allotment of alternate
W.P.No.12010/2016:
51. It is the contention of learned counsel appearing for
petitioner that petitioner has paid excess amount than what
was demanded by the BDA and as such petitioner may be
refunded the excess amount and to the said extent, she seeks
for a writ of mandamus being issued by the BDA.
W.P.No.13637/2016:
52. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner has
sought for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to
consider the representation for allotment of site.
W.P.No.15833/2016:
petitioner that petitioner has purchased a site carved out of
Sy.No.26/5 situated at K.Narayanapura Village, K.R.Puram
Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, under a registered sale deed
dated 28.04.1997 and thereafter, revenue records were
mutated in his name as per Annexure-C to C-13 and in the
year 2003 said area has fallen within the jurisdiction of BBMP
and taxes have been paid to BBMP and khatha has been made
over in the name of petitioner. It is also contended that

655
petitioner came to know about the acquisition only in the year
2015 and immediately thereafter he has filed present writ
petition challenging the present Notification.
53.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Standing
Counsel appearing for petitioner opposing the prayer sought
for in the petition he would contend that petitioner is bound by
the judgment rendered by the Division Bench whereunder the
only remedy given to the revenue site holders is to make an
application and as such petitioner cannot feign ignorance in
the light of law laid down by the Apex Court. He would submit
that claim of the petitioner is in accordance with the dicta laid
down by the Division Bench, which is since been upheld by the
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY's case and as such
petitioner would be entitled to an alternate site. He would
submit that only in order to overcome the latches a feeble
attempt has been made by pleading as though the petitioner
came to know about the acquisition only in the year 2015 and
having not challenged the acquisition proceedings at this
length of time, petitioner would not be entitled to relief sought
for. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

656
W.P.No.33385/2016:
54. Petitioners claim to be the owners of land bearing
Sy.No.35/1 measuring 2 acres 31 guntas situated at
Thanisandra Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
54.1 It is the contention of Sri T Seshagiri Rao, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioners that entire property is built
up and land situated in all the four sides of the property has
been deleted.
respondent-BDA has contended that on the eastern side and
southern side, land bearing Sy.No.170/10B and 35/2
respectively have been acquired and have not been deleted. He
would also draw the attention of Court to the mahazar drawn
as per Annexure-R1 to contend that except building described
therein, entire land was vacant as on the date of mahazar
being drawn i.e., on 25.08.2003 and any further improvements
made by the petitioners would not enure to their benefit.
Hence, he submits that claim of the petitioners would not fall
within the parameters laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.

657
W.P.No.38919/2016:
55. Under the Preliminary Notification, an extent of 1
acre 11 guntas in Sy.No.11/10 of Jakkur Village (out of total
extent of 2 acres 21 guntas) has sought to be acquired under
Sl.No.28. Subsequent to Final Notification dated 23.02.2004,
an extent of 0.26 guntas was sought to be acquired under
Sl.No.18. Subsequent to the order of Division Bench and
Hon’ble Apex Court, an exercise has been undertaken by the
BDA, which resulted in Notification dated 18.06.2014 being
issued under which BDA has sought to acquire 0.14 guntas of
land as reflected at Sl.No.697 of said Notification. The
comprehensive plan which has been produced at Annexure-S
would clearly indicate that on the western portion of
Sy.No.11/10 is sought to be acquired. The lands so proposed
to be acquired is bounded on the northern side of Sy.No.10/4
and 10/3, which have not been acquired and on the southern
side of Sy.No.11/10 which is dropped from the acquisition and
on the eastern side bounded on Sy.No.13/2 has also been
deleted from the acquisition. On the western side, which is
bounded on Sy.Nos.11/1 and 11/2, have not been acquired at
all, which would clearly goes to show that it is the landlocked

658
land as indicated in paragraph 160(ii) of the BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case.
55.1 This factual matrix is not seriously disputed by the
learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In fact
statement of objections itself has not been filed in this petition.
Prima facie it would indicate that land in question is the
landlocked land.
W.P.No.47461/2016:
56. Petitioners are seeking for a direction to
respondents to allot sites measuring 40’ x 60’ formed in
Sy.Nos.17, 18, 19/1 & 31/1 of Venkateshpura and
Sampigehalli village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk.
56.1 It is the contention of Sri Adinarayan, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioners that petitioners and
similarly placed persons are members of third respondent –
society and an extent of 41 acres of land came to be in
possession of society, who developed the same into sites and
petitioner had been allotted a site and same is the subject
matter of acquisition by BDA for formation of Arkavati Layout.
By relying upon the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the
case of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case, petitioners seeks for a

659
direction to respondents to consider their representations for
allotment of site.
56.2 Per contra, Sri Lakshmeesh Rao, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA submits that sites have been
formed in the area, which has been acquired after taking
possession of said land. He further submits that petitioner
does not have any right, inasmuch as, there is no registered
sale deed in his favour and as such, question of considering
the claim for allotment of site would not arise.
56.3 Perusal of records would disclose that
undisputedly, petitioners are claiming right for allotment of
site based on allotment made by third respondent – society
during the year 2001. Undisputedly, there is no registered
sale deed executed in his favour. Petitioners had not
challenged acquisition proceedings at any point of time. Thus,
grievance of the petitioners, if any, has to be addressed by
third respondent, would not arise and as such, question of
issuing any writ in the nature of mandamus to second
respondent would not arise.

660
W.P.No.54790/2016:
57. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to
direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to acquire schedule property in
accordance with law and award compensation to the
petitioner.
57.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that out of 1 acre 20
guntas in Sy.No.42/3 possession to an extent of 20 guntas of
land has been forcibly taken by BDA for formation of Layout
and initially BDA had made an attempt to dispossess the
petitioner and suit was filed in O.S.No.1845/2010 and interim
order of temporary injunction was sought, which was denied
and on rejection of Interlocutory Application for temporary
injunction had been confirmed in MFA No.3564/2011 on
23.08.2011 with a direction to trial court to consider the claim
of plaintiff independently, which resulted in permanent
injunction being granted by virtue of judgment and decree
having been passed by the trial court, it is established that
petitioner’s land to the extent of 20 guntas has been forcibly
taken over by respondent-BDA and as such, he sought for
allowing the writ petition and granting the reliefs sought for.
661
57.2 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA would support the endorsement
dated 08.08.2016 – Annexure-N issued to petitioner
whereunder it has been stated that land belonging to the
petitioner has not been acquired.
57.3 Petitioner claims to have acquired title to the
property in question and on the premise that BDA was
attempting to interfere with the possession of land, suit came
to be filed in O.S.No.1845/2010 and interim order of
temporary injunction sought for was negatived and confirmed
in MFA No.3564/2011 by order dated 23.08.2011.
Subsequently, suit having been decreed, on the said basis
premise petitioner is seeking writ of mandamus in this writ
petition. Holistic reading of entire judgment and decree
passed by trial court would clearly indicate that plaintiff’s
possession over property in question has been reiterated by
the learned trial Judge and has held that petitioner was in
possession of the suit schedule property as on date of filing of
said suit vide paragraph 9 of the judgment. On the other
hand, consistent stand of respondent - BDA throughout is that
land in question measures 1 acre 20 guntas, out of which, 20

662
guntas is kharab land. As such, question of paying
compensation to the petitioner has been rejected by
respondent-BDA vide endorsement dated 08.08.2016 –
Annexure-N. In fact, said endorsement would disclose that
there was existing road already and if it is so, this court sitting
in writ jurisdiction would not be in a position to adjudicate the
disputed question of fact and as such, it would be open for the
petitioner to establish with regard to his title to the extent of
20 guntas and then seek for appropriate relief of payment of
compensation.
W.P.No.27750/2018:
petitioners that petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of
sites purchased by them under the respective sale deeds and
they have not been divested of the possession of properties and
as such acquisition proceedings in respect of these sites ought
to be quashed by quashing the Preliminary and Final
Notification.
W.P.Nos.59793/2016:
59. Petitioners who are owners of property bearing
Sy.No.21/5 of Kempapura village, measuring 1 acre 2 guntas
are before this Court seeking declaration that notice dated

663
06.09.2016 – Annexure-E issued by second respondent
whereunder petitioners are called upon to execute certain
documents and undertaking for receiving the land to an extent
of 40% i.e., an extent in the ratio of 60:40 for each acre.
59.1 Petitioners purchased the land in question on
17.01.2004 from one Sri. Manjappa, who in turn had
purchased the land from Sri. Anthonappa under registered
sale deed dated 26.04.1993. Proceedings came to be initiated
against said Sri. Manjappa alleging violation of Section 79A of
the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1973 and said proceedings
having attained Finality before Karnataka Appellate Tribunal
in Appeal No.79/2002 whereunder Tribunal set aside the order
of forfeiture dated 11.07.1997 and allowed the appeal by order
dated 19.08.2002.
59.2 During this interregnum period, land in question
came to be notified by BDA for acquisition for formation of
residential Layout known as ‘Arkavati Layout’ on account of
petitioners names having not been reflected in the acquisition
proceedings and alleging violation of principles of natural
justice, petitioners were before this Court in
W.P.Nos.31467/2011 & 40778/2013 for quashing of

664
Notification dated 23.02.2004 on the ground it was illegal.
Said writ petitions came to be disposed of by Co-ordinate
Bench on 30.09.2013 vide Annexure-A by observing to the
following effect:
“12. With regard to the factual situation on

that aspect, certainly this Court will not go into
that aspect at this juncture in a writ petition, since
the same would have to be looked into by the
respondents keeping in view not only the
documents under which the petitioners No.1 to 3
have purchased the property, but the fact situation
existing keeping in view the nature of construction,
if any that is available therein, age of construction
etc., so as to find out, whether such construction
in fact existed much prior to the Preliminary
Notification or not. On deciding this aspect, the
appropriate relief as available to the petitioners
under Para 160 of the judgment in Bondu
Ramaswamy’s case would be made applicable to
the petitioner. Therefore, the petition is disposed of
with a direction to the respondents not to proceed
further with the acquisition proceedings as
initiated, but to consider the case of the petitioners
under the category where it would be admissible as
stated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
decision referred to above.
13. In order to enable such consideration, the

petitioners shall now file all the necessary papers
and copy of this order with the respondents within
three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of
this order. The respondent No.2 shall thereafter
consider the case of the petitioners in the manner
as directed herein above and thereafter come to a
conclusion with regard to the nature of relief to be
granted. Such relief would be available to the
petitioners No.1 to 3 jointly and the petitioner No.4
shall be excluded, since the petitioners No.1 to 3
have indicated that they have purchased the
property from the petitioner No.4. The
consideration of the respondent No.2 shall be
concluded as expeditiously as possible, but not
665
later than six weeks from the date of copy being

filed with the respondents. The further action, if
any to be taken in that regard shall also be
concluded as expeditiously as possible.”
60. Pursuant to the same, petitioners submitted
representation on 29.10.2013 enclosing order passed in the
writ petitions as well as other documents and pursuant to the
same, impugned endorsement/intimation came to be issued to
the petitioners. Thereafter, petitioners submitted
representation dated 19.09.2016 to the BDA contending that
claim of petitioners will have to be considered in accordance
with paragraph 160 of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. On
account of non-consideration of said representation,
petitioners are before this Court.
60.1 It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing
for petitioners that representation of petitioners has not been
considered in terms of directions/clarification issued by
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and even
otherwise, records of BDA would itself demonstrates that land
of petitioners is in the midst of lands, which have already been
deleted and as such, question of continuing acquisition
proceedings would be diametrically opposite to the dicta laid

666
down by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.
It is also contended that when the authority itself has given up
neighbouring lands, question of continuing proceedings in
respect of land belonging to petitioners would not serve any
purpose and there cannot be formation of Layout in the
isolated pieces of land. Hence, he has prayed for allowing the
petition.
respondent No.-2-BDA would support acquisition proceedings
on the ground it has already been upheld by the Apex Court.
W.P.No.64534/2016:
61. Petitioner is seeking for an alternate site and as
such has sought for writ of mandamus being issued to
respondents.
61.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that BDA had
allotted a site in favour of petitioner bearing Sy.No.1313 and
even possession certificate also came to be issued pursuant to
which khatha was mutated in the name of petitioner and taxes
were also paid. However, BDA has cancelled khatha on the
ground that said site is to be allotted to the land owners in lieu

667
of they having given up their right over the lands, which have
been acquired for the formation of Layout. Hence, she seeks
for a writ of mandamus being issued to BDA for allotment of
alternate site.
W.P.No.815/2017 c/w W.P. No.6717/2016:
62. Petitioner was allotted a site bearing No.748 in 8th
Block, Arkavati Layout on 24.06.2006. Pursuant to which
Lease-cum-Sale Agreement was executed on 15.11.2007 and
Possession Certificate was issued on 17.11.2007. However, on
account of said site falling under the redo category, physical
possession of the site so allotted was not delivered in favour of
the petitioner. Hence, a representation came to be submitted
by the petitioner on 06.08.2014 for allotment of alternate site.
Acceding to the request made by the petitioner, a site bearing
No.BK90 was allotted on 31.05.2016. Thereafter allotment
process insofar as said site relating to the petitioner has got
stagnated for reasons unknown. Hence, petitioner has
invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court for issuance of
writ of mandamus to direct the BDA to perform its statutory
duty namely; to execute Lease-cum-Sale Agreement and
deliver possession of the property to petitioner.

668
W.P.No. 21361/2017:
63. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to the
respondent – BDA to execute absolute Sale Deed in respect of
site No.1170 contending that Lease-cum-Sale Agreement was
executed way back on 24.06.2006 and possession has been
delivered and Katha has also been mutated in the name of the
petitioner and for the reasons best known, BDA is not
executing Sale Deed.
63.1 Having regard to the aforestated facts petitioner
would be entitled to the relief sought for or in other words, it
has to be necessarily held that writ of mandamus is to be
issued to the respondents to execute the Sale Deed in respect
of site allotted to him. Mere pendency of proceedings would
not absolve the respondents-BDA from discharging its
statutory obligations, particularly when there being no order of
stay or injunction operating against the BDA to execute the
Sale Deed.
W.P.No.40596/2017:
64. Sy.No.4/4 which totally measures 1 acre 28 guntas
situated at Thanisandra Village has sought to be acquired to
an extent of 12 guntas, which is under challenge.

669
Sri.Nagabhushan, learned counsel appearing for petitioner by
reiterating the grounds urged in W.P.No.28861/2014 would
also rely upon the RTC Extracts (Annexure-A), which would
indicate that way back in the year 2000-01 name of the
petitioner has been entered in the revenue records or in other
words, revenue records came to be mutated in the name of
petitioner and yet BDA has not notified the name of khatedar
by including the name of petitioner, but issued Notification in
the name of a dead person. He would also submit that land
which is sought to be acquired is adjacent and abutting to land
which has not been notified and no useful or fruitful purpose
would be served in continuing the acquisition proceedings and
as such he prays for quashing of the proceedings.
W.P. No. 43194/2017:
65. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to the
respondents to consider the representations dated 03.05.2017
Annexures – F and F1, contending interalia, that petitioner
was the allottee of site bearing No.833 Annexure – A in Survey
No.8/5 of Sampigehalli Village. Pursuant to which, Lease-
cum-Sale Agreement was executed on 28.02.2007 and
Possession Certificate was also issued. It is also stated that
Katha of the said property was mutated in the name of

670
petitioner and he has been paying taxes. But surprisingly,
BDA executed a Sale Deed in respect of same property, which
was allotted to the petitioner in favour of one Sri Narayanappa
under a registered Sale Deed dated 05.07.2013 and as such a
representation was submitted on 03.05.2017 seeking for
cancellation of said Sale Deed and execution of absolute Sale
Deed in favour of the petitioner or alternatively to allot
alternate site. Undisputedly, in the instant case subsequent
purchaser who has acquired right over the property namely,
site said to have been allotted in favour of the petitioner, has
not been made a party, who is necessary and proper party. As
such question of granting relief of either cancellation of the
Sale Deed executed by BDA in favour of said Narayanappa or
declaring that petitioner could be the absolute owner of the
said site No.833 by virtue of Lease-Cum-Sale Agreement dated
27.02.2007 on executing by BDA, does not arise.
65.1 However, petitioner having been allotted site in the
year 2007 itself, pursuant to which a Lease-cum-Sale Deed
have also been executed, Possession Certificate issued, Katha
mutated in his name, BDA will have to necessarily consider his

671
claim for allotment of alternate site by considering the
representations dated 03.05.2017.
W.P.No.49031/2017:
66. Petitioner herein came to be allotted site bearing
No.721, Block VIII of Arkavati Layout on 24.06.2006. After
having paid Rs.2,27,300/- on 24.02.2007, Lease cum Sale
Agreement came to be executed on 17.05.2007 and khatha
was made over to the name of the petitioner. On account of
said site having been allotted in favour of erstwhile owners,
petitioner was allotted alternate site bearing No.1043 in Block
VIII and allotment letter was issued on 10.04.2014. Despite
submitting representations to issue possession certificate and
Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of site No.1043, BDA has
not executed the same. Hence, petitioner is before this Court
seeking for a direction to BDA to issue possession certificate
and to execute Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of Site
No.1043.
66.1 No statement of objections has been filed by BDA
controverting the averments made in the objections. This
would only indicate that BDA has no objection for writ of
mandamus being issued.

672
W.P.No.26667/2018:
67. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits
that as per the report of Special Land Acquisition Officer
(Annexure-K) it has been clearly stated therein that land
owned by the petitioners cannot be acquired and as such
representation has been submitted to BDA for denotifying the
same and representations of petitioners having not been
considered, they are seeking for writ of mandamus being
issued to respondents to consider their representation. His
submission is placed on record.
W.P.No.53051/2018:
68. It is the contention of Sri. Nagabhushan, learned
counsel appearing for petitioner that property of the petitioner,
which he has inherited from his grandfather measures 39 feet
from East to West and 37 feet from North to South carved out
of from Sy.No.27/4B of Kempapura Village and said land
having been notified for acquisition, was the subject matter of
acquisition even under the earlier acquisition proceedings and
subsequently, by the impugned Notification a portion of
Sy.No.27/4B viz., to an extent of 20 guntas including the land
of petitioner is sought to be acquired giving a complete goby to
the direction issued by the Division Bench as well as Apex

673
Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and BDA has failed to
consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and
drawing the attention of court to paragraph 22 wherein the
adjacent survey numbers have been indicated, which are said
to have been deleted by BDA, proposed acquisition of
Sy.No.27/4B is sought to be quashed. He would also contend
that in view of adjacent land owners in respect of very same
survey numbers having been deleted, if the land of petitioner is
sought to be acquired without considering prayer for deletion,
it amounts to considering equals by unequals thereby hit by
Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Hence, he prays for
allowing the writ petition.
W.P.Nos.15096/2019:
69. It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing
for petitioners that land bearing Sy.No.4/4 of Horamavu
village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, which is
sought to be acquired under the Notification dated 18.06.2014
is to be deleted and by relying upon directions issued in
W.A.No.2624/2005, petitioners claim that they are entitled for
alternate sites in the event of prayer for deletion of sites in
question is not acceded to.

674
69.1 Per contra, learned Advocates appearing for
respondent-BDA would support the acquisition proceedings
and contend that petitioners are subsequent purchasers and
as such, they would not get any right and they pray for
dismissal of writ petitions.
69.2 Perusal of the records in W.P.No.15096/2019
would disclose that mother of petitioner acquired title to the
property bearing Sy.No.4/4 under registered sale deed dated
22.06.1995 and subsequently, gift deed has been executed in
favour of petitioner in the year 2008 by which time,
Preliminary Notification and Final Notification had been
issued.
69.3 Working plan of Sy.No.4/4 of Byrathikhane earlier
known as Horamavu Agara village has been perused, which
would indicate that on the northern side of Sy.No.4/4,
Sy.No.4/6 is existing which has already been acquired. On the
Western side, Sy.No.3/1 is located which has been acquired
and on the eastern side, Sy.No.15/1 has also been acquired
and so also on the southern side. Petitioner has undisputedly
claimed title to the property based on the gift deed executed in
the year 2008, which is subsequent to the Notification dated

675
03.02.2003 and has not submitted any representation to the
BDA, pursuant to order passed by Division Bench in
W.A.No.2624/2005.
W.P.No.27833/2014:
70. Petitioner is seeking for quashing of the acquisition
of lands as notified under the impugned Notification insofar as
it relates to 1 acre 12 guntas in Sy.No.30 of Sampigehalli
village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore
contending interalia that said land was sold to the petitioner
after notifying the said land to be available for public auction
vide notice dated 11.04.2007 – Annexure-B, pursuant to which
petitioner participated and was a successful bidder and has
deposited the entire amount. It is also contended that auction
sale has been approved by the appropriate Government on
11.05.2007 – Annexure-D and possession of the land was
delivered on 18.10.2008. Thereafter, petitioner had sought
permission of the appropriate Government to put up a
compound wall and Deputy Commissioner by communication
dated 31.10.2008 – Annexure-AC, permitted the petitioner to
put up compound wall. It is also stated that certificate of sale
also came to be issued by the Deputy Commissioner on
01.07.2013 – Annexure-AF. It is also contended that at this

676
point of time, if the proceedings for acquiring said land
initiated at the behest of the BDA if allowed to continue, it
would not only cause financial hardship to the petitioner but
he would be put to irretrievable loss. Hence, on this ground,
petitioner seeks for deletion of land in question from being
acquired.
71. Per contra, Sri.K.Krishna, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA by reiterating the grounds
urged in the statement of objections would contend that
pursuant to Preliminary Notification dated 03.02.2003 and
Final Notification dated 23.02.2004, award came to be passed
on 25.11.2004 to an extent of 7 acres. He would also contend
that on account of dispute pending with regard to an extent of
7 acres and there being order of status-quo granted on
15.07.2014, no further development has taken place to the
extent of 7 acres and land in question having been classified
as gomal land and same being vacant and not falling under
any of the categories as indicated by the Division Bench of this
Court and clarified by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY 's case, he prays for dismissal of the petition.

677
W.P.Nos.47606/2014:
72. Petitioner claiming to have purchased a revenue
site under a registered sale deed dated 04.12.2013 for valuable
consideration is seeking for declaring the land in question
which has been Reserved for Future Development (RFD) for the
implementation of scheme for Arkavati Layout relating to
Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6, is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable; for a writ of mandamus to direct the
respondents to delete the land bearing Sy.No.45/5 belonging
to petitioner for the scheme of formation of Layout; and, to
declare that depicting of land belonging to petitioner in the
development plan and map for implementing the scheme for
formation of Arkavati Layout is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable against petitioner.
72.1 It is contended that Sy.No.45/5 was never acquired
and as such question of invoking the doctrine of eminent
domain insofar as site belonging to petitioner carved out of
Sy.No.45/5 does not arise and it would fall outside the
acquisition proceedings. Hence, petitioner seeks for allowing
the prayer sought for in the writ petition.

678
72.2 Respondent/BDA has specifically contended that
there is no Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 in Dasarahalli Village but on
the other hand, it is only the Sy.No.45, which totally measures
9 acres 3 guntas and it is mufut kaval, Government kharab
land and alleged purchase of land by petitioner on 04.12.2013
is after 10 years of the date of issuance of Preliminary
Notification and as such petitioner do not get any right over
the property and sale itself is void. He would also contend that
petitioner has nowhere contended that as to how the
predecessor in title of the petitioner acquired the right over
suit property and alleged grant is not produced.
72.3 Sri.K.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for
respondent/BDA has made available the copy of map depicting
subject property i.e., Sy.No.45 wherein it has been reflected as
‘mufut kaval kharab’ of 9 acre 3 guntas is sought to be
acquired. Whereas in the photocopy of the Preliminary
Notification dated 23.02.2004 produced at Annexure-C an
entry has been reflected as ‘45/P’ and what is sought to be
acquired is 1 acre 3 guntas, even the boundaries on East,
West, North and South has been reflected improperly.
Whereas in respect of serial number 43 and 45 the boundaries
as well as extent, which has been reflected, is same as that

679
being reflected in the original gazette Notification. This itself
speak the conduct of BDA in attempting to dodge the court
from perusing the records. As already noticed hereinabove,
petitioner, who claims to be a revenue site owner, has
purchased the property in question on 04.12.2013 i.e., after 10
years of the issuance of Preliminary Notification on
03.02.2003. Hence, petitioners are not entitled to the relief
sought for.
W.P.Nos.47607/2014:
73. Petitioner claiming to have purchased a revenue
site under a registered sale deed dated 18.03.2013 for valuable
consideration has sought for declaring the land in question
which has been Reserved for Future Development (RFD) for the
implementation of scheme for Arkavati Layout relating to
Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable; for a writ of mandamus to direct the
respondents to delete the land bearing Sy.No.45/5 belonging
to petitioner for the scheme of formation of Layout; and, to
declare that depicting of the land belonging to petitioner in the
development plan and map for implementing the scheme for
formation of Arkavati Layout is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable against petitioner.

680
73.1 It is contended that Sy.No.45/5 was never acquired
and as such question of invoking the doctrine of eminent
domain insofar as site belonging to petitioner carved out of
Sy.No.45/5 does not arise and it would fall outside the
acquisition proceedings. Hence, petitioner seeks for allowing
the prayer sought for in the writ petition.
73.2 Respondent/BDA has specifically contended that
there is no Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 in Dasarahalli Village but on
the other hand it is only the Sy.No.45, which totally measures
9 acres 3 guntas and it is mufut kaval, Government kharab
land and alleged purchase of land by petitioner on 18.03.2013
is after 10 years of the date of issuance of Preliminary
Notification and as such petitioner do not get any right over
the property and sale itself is void. He would also contend that
petitioner has nowhere contended that as to how the
predecessor in title of the petitioner acquired the right over
suit property and alleged grant is not produced.
73.3 Sri.K.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for
respondent/BDA has made available the copy of map depicting
subject property i.e., Sy.No.45 wherein it has been reflected as
‘mufut kaval kharab’ of 9 acre 3 guntas is sought to be
acquired. Whereas in the photocopy of the Preliminary

681
Notification dated 23.02.2004 produced at Annexure-C an
entry has been reflected as ‘45/P’ and what is sought to be
acquired is 1 acre 3 guntas even the boundaries on East, West,
North and South has been reflected improperly. Whereas in
respect of serial number 43 and 45 the boundaries as well as
extent which has been reflected is same as that being reflected
in the original gazette Notification. This itself speak the
conduct of BDA in attempting to dodge the court from
perusing the records. As already noticed hereinabove
petitioner, who claims to be a revenue site owner, has
purchased the property in question on 18.03.2013 i.e., after 10
years of the issuance of Preliminary Notification on
03.02.2003.
W.P.NO.1876/2016:
74. Petitioner claims to be the revenue site holder
having purchased the site carved out of Sy.No.33/1,
Dasarahalli village under a registered sale deed dated
21.10.1994. It is contended that despite submission of
representation dated 09.06.2012 to delete the site purchased
by petitioner, BDA has not favourably considered the same
and as such, she has sought for not only deleting the said site
from acquisition but has also sought for a direction to the

682
second respondent to consider her representation dated
09.06.2012 – Annexure-E.
74.1 The Division Bench while disposing of the matter,
insofar as revenue site holders are concerned, has extended an
olive branch by directing such of the revenue site holders to
register themselves as applicants for allotment under
Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules,
1984 within a period of two months from the date of order i.e.,
25.11.2005 and extendable for additional period of one month,
if sufficient cause is shown. However, records do not disclose
that petitioner has got registered with BDA.
74.2 Be that as it may. Even assuming for a moment
that pendency of cases before courts precluded the petitioner
from getting herself registered as directed by Division Bench is
a good ground to call upon the BDA to consider representation
of the petitioner, by itself would not suffice for the simple
reason that writ of mandamus can be issued only when there
is a statutory right vested in the applicant, demand made and
non-consideration of such demand by the authority. In this
regard, representation stated to have been submitted by the
petitioner which is at Annexure-E dated 09.06.2012 cannot be
construed as a valid representation, inasmuch as, it does not

683
bear acknowledgement for having submitted the said
representation to BDA or office copy would contain seal of BDA
and writ of mandamus to consider such representation cannot
be issued. However, in the interest of justice and in the light
of judgment rendered by the Division Bench directing the BDA
to consider the representations/applications submitted even
beyond the time prescribed, similar directions requires to be
issued to BDA, to consider the representations/applications
submitted by applicants-revenue site holders by keeping in
mind the observations made by the Division Bench and
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, similar
relief deserves to be granted to petitioner also.
W.P.Nos.19783/2018:
75. Petitioner claims to be the owner of 2 sites (totalling
to an extent of 2 Acres 9 guntas) in Sy.No.46/2 situated at
Amruthahalli village and out of which 2 acres have been
notified for acquisition, contends that he has purchased 2 sites
bearing Nos.3 and 4 each measuring 40 X 72 ft. and that said
acquisition is liable to be interfered on the ground that
adjacent lands are fully built up as evident from the sketch
/plan- Annexure-A and it would meet the
clarifications/directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

684
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. He would also submit that
petitioner has constructed fairly a big residential houses and
for want of finance he could not construct regular house. He
would also submit that composite property of 2 acres is
notified and all the 3 sites are residential apartment buildings
and as such forming sites in isolated pocket i.e., in 2 acres
would be contrary to the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in
the BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for
allowing the petition.
75.1 Per contra, Sri. Krishna, learned counsel appearing
for respondent-BDA would support the acquisition proceedings
and he would contend that possession of 2 acres is taken and
sites are formed by BDA and 13 sites have already been
allotted to the applicants who had sought for sites. Hence, he
prays for dismissal of petition.
75.2 It has to be seen from the directions issued by
Division Bench and also clarifications/directions issued by the
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, that land holders
whose lands have been locked are sought to be acquired and
residential sites are to be constructed in small pockets, same
could not serve the purpose for which land is sought to be
acquired. If the lands are not in isolated pocket or it would

685
form major chunk, proposed acquisition would suffice for BDA
for formation of sites and it is not open for the petitioner to
contend that even in such circumstances also, lands proposed
for acquisition are to be deleted.
W.P.No.2462/2015:
76. As already observed hereinabove, under the guise
of implementing orders of Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case, which was in furtherance of orders
passed by Division Bench whereunder several guidelines came
to be issued to BDA to ensure that where the lands sought to
be acquired is a landlocked area or in other words, island and
as such continuation of the acquisition proceedings would not
be favourable in the interest of both parties. Apex Court had
also directed BDA to drop such pocket of lands from being
acquired. Taking umbrage under this order, officials of BDA
seems to have gone on the spree of de-notifying the lands by
pick and choose methods. In other words, there being no
transparency and obviously to favour such of those persons
whom they thought is to be favoured, the glaring example for
such incidents can be noticed in respect of lands bearing
Sy.No.89/1 situated at Nagavara village, Map of which lands

686
has been produced by learned panel counsel appearing for
BDA, boundaries as described in the said Map reads as under:
East by: Sy.No.87 not acquired

West by: Sy.No.90 which is not included in the
Final Notification
North by: Sy.No.102/5 notified for acquisition
South by: Sy.No.89/2 notified for acquisition and later
on not included in the revised Final
Notification.
76.1 Sri. B.S. Sachin, learned panel counsel appearing
for BDA would fairly submit that there is mis-description of
the property in the sketch, particularly on the boundary of
eastern side of Sy.No.89/1. As could be seen from the map,
eastern side boundary i.e.,Sy.No.89/1 is recorded as Sy.No.90,
though it is Sy.No.102/5 and Sy.No.87. In fact, eastern
boundary is 89/2 as well as 89/5 and 89/5 is not abutting
Sy.No.89/1.
76.2 Even according to BDA, Sy.No.89/1 of the
Nagavara village measures 13 guntas and out of which, 2
guntas is Kharab land and remaining 11 guntas is said to have
been included under the acquisition namely, under the revised
Notification dated 18.06.2014 at Sl.No.1178. However, in
compilation of documents furnished to the court at part 1-B

687
relating to Nagavara village, which is at page Nos. 439 to 443,
Sy.Nos.89/1, 89/5, 89/9 have been left out. In the map which
has been made available to the court insofar as Nagavara
village is concerned, Sy.No.90 has not been included in the
Notification at all. Though, nothing is placed on record,
learned counsel appearing for the BDA submits that it is a
Layout which is approved by the BDA.
Be that as it may. Pleadings are lacking in this regard.
Even in respect of Sy.No.87, which is reflected as southern
boundary and Sy.No.89/1, which has not been notified for
acquisition. Likewise, Sy.No.89/2 which is not only abutting
and adjacent to Sy.No.89/1, southern side of Sy.No.89/1 has
not been included in the Notification. Sy.No.89/5 which is a
pocket of 7 guntas of land is sought to be acquired and despite
bringing to the notice of BDA by the owner of land bearing
Sy.No.89/5 indicating that Sy.No.89/2 has not been acquired
and Sy.No.89/6 is also left out, reason for including only 89/5
that too measuring 7 guntas of land which is island, no
reasons are forthcoming. As such this court has been
perforced to observe hereinabove that strategy has been
adopted by BDA by use of pick and choose method to de-notify

688
the land subsequent to orders of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case
passed by Hon’ble Apex Court. It requires serious examination
and officials who have indulged in such acts cannot go un-
punished. However, truth has to be ascertained in that regard
and it is left to the authorities to consider these aspects for
taking action against erring officials.
W.P.Nos.3178/2017 c/w 55737/2016, 10923/2015,

58734/2016, 15588/2017, 14868/2017, 30485/2017 &
59317/2016:
77. It is the contention of Sri.C.M.Nagabhushan,
learned Advocate appearing for petitioners that petitioners are
allottees of the sites much prior to acquisition proceedings
being set aside by learned Single Judge and on account of
order passed by the learned Single Judge having been set
aside by Division Bench on 25.11.2005 in W.A.No.2624/2005
and connected matters, BDA has undertaken the exercise as
per the directions issued by Division Bench and in the process,
has denotified several lands on the premise that they would
fall within the parameters indicated in the operative portion of
the order passed by the Division Bench and as such, site
owners/land owners were entitled to the relief sought for and
exercise undertaken by BDA is erroneous and contrary to the
facts. Assailing the same, petitioners are before this court for
689
a direction to BDA to consider their representations and also
to quash the Notification dated 18.06.2014.
77.1 Per contra, Sriyuths B.S.Sachin, K.Krishna and
Goutham Dev C Ullal, learned Advocates appearing for
respondent-BDA reiterated the contentions urged, pleas
advanced and facts pleaded in the statement of objections.
This Court Has already noticed the gist of arguments of
petitioners' counsel and reply arguments of respondents
counsel hereinabove.
77.2 Having regard to the rival contentions and on
perusal of records, it would clearly disclose that there is no
dispute to the fact that acquisition of lands, which is the
subject matter of these writ petitions was for the purpose of
formation of Arkavati Layout.
77.3 The Division Bench has upheld the acquisition of
lands for the purposes of formation of Arkavati Layout. It
came to be held:
“106. The acquisition of the lands for formation

of Arkavati Layout is upheld subject to the following
conditions:
106(C)(a) In so far as the site owners are

concerned, they are entitled to the following
reliefs:
(i) These site owners/writ petitioners
shall register themselves as
690
applicants for allotment under the

Bangalore Development Authority
(Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984
within a period of two months from
today (extendable by another one
month by BDA, if sufficient cause is
shown). Petitioners will have to pay
only the registration fee. They need
not pay initial deposit as their sites
have been acquired and they have
agreed not to receive compensation in
regard to the sites under this
arrangement.
(ii) The petitioners shall file applications
for allotment of sites to BDA within
three months from today in the
prescribed form stating that they are
applicants who were the petitioners in
these writ petitions. Petitioners shall
file their documents with BDA within
a period of two months to enable BDA
to verify the same.
(iii) BDA will treat them as applicants
entitled to priority in allotment and
allot each of them a site measuring
30’ x 40’ in Arkavati Layout or in any
other nearby Layouts in Bangalore at
the prevailing allotment prices subject
to petitioners satisfying that twin
requirements for allotment under the
BDA (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984,
that they must be the residents of
Bangalore (10 year domicile) and
should not be owning any residential
property in Bangalore.
(iv) If there are no rival claimants for
compensation in regard to the plots
claimed by petitioners, and if the
ownership of the petitioners in regard
to their respective sites which have
been acquired is not disputed, BDA
shall calculate the compensation
payable to the petitioners and give
credit to the same by adjusting the
same towards the allotment price for
the site to be allotted and call upon
691
the petitioners to pay the balance.

Petitioners shall be given six months
time for making payment. (To enable
petitioners to know the amount of
compensation which they will be
entitled and to ascertain how much
balance they should pay).
(v) If there are rival claimants in regard
to the survey numbers or the sites or
if any petitioners title in regard to the
sites are challenged, BDA shall make
a reference in regard to the
compensation in regard to such
site/land in question, to the Civil
Court under Section 30 of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 and the
petitioners will have to sort out the
matter before the Reference Court. In
that event, such petitioners will have
to pay the full allotment price within
the time stipulated, without seeking
adjustment of compensation for the
acquired site.
(vi) If any of the petitioners does not fulfill
the requirements for allotment, under
the Allotment Rules, their cases may
be considered for allotment of 20' x
30' sites as per the Rules containing
incentive scheme for voluntary
surrender of lands. For the purpose of
the said scheme, such petitioners will
be deemed to have voluntarily
surrendered the sites;
(vii) The above scheme will be available to
only those who are owners, as a
consequence of execution of
registered sale deeds in their favour
prior to the date of Preliminary
Notification (and not to
GPA/Agreement Holders).
(D) Insofar as the landowners excluding the site

owners, are entitled to the following reliefs.--
(i) All the petitioners who are the

landowners who are seeking dropping of
692
the acquisition proceedings insofar as

their respective lands are concerned, on
the ground that: (a) their lands are
situated within green belt area; (b) they
are totally built up; (c) properties
wherein there are buildings constructed
by charitable, educational and/or
religious institutions; (d) nursery lands;
(e) who have set-up factories; (f) their
lands are similar to the lands which are
adjoining their lands but not notified for
acquisition at all, are permitted to make
appropriate application to the
authorities seeking such exclusion and
exemption and producing documents to
substantiate their contentions within
one month from the date of this order.
It is made clear that the BDA shall

consider such request keeping in mind
the status of the land as on the date of
Preliminary Notification and to exclude
any developments, improvements,
constructions put up subsequent to the
Preliminary Notification and then decide
whether their cases are similar to that of
the landowners whose lands, are
notified for acquisition, notified and
whose objections were upheld and no
Final Notification is issued.
In the event the BDA comes to the

conclusion that the lands of those
persons are similarly placed, then to
exclude those lands from acquisition.
(ii) Petitioners who are interested in availing

this benefit shall make appropriate
application within 30 days from the date
of this order and thereafter the BDA
shall give notice to those persons, hear
them and pass appropriate orders
expeditiously.
(iii)Till the aforesaid exercise is undertaken

by the BDA and the applications filed by
693
the petitioners either for allotment of

site or for denotifying or exemption
sought for are considered their
possession shall not be disturbed and
the existing construction shall not be
demolished. After consideration of the
applications, in the light of the aforesaid
directions, if the lands are not excluded
then the BDA is at liberty to proceed
with the acquisition.
(E) The BDA is directed to exclude the land

bearing Sy. No. 9/1 measuring 0.27, 10/2
measuring 1.16 and 10/3 measuring 1.02 of
land which are the subject-matter of W.P.
Nos. 1353-1354/2005 filed by University of
Agricultural Science Employees House
Building Co-operative Society from
acquisition.
(F) W.P.No.28087 of 2004 is allowed and

acquisition of land in respect of 53 acres of
land in Nagavara Village which is the subject
matter of the aforesaid Writ Petition is
quashed.
(2) W.A.No.2757/2005 is partly allowed. In

W.P.No.25807/2004 filed by Tata Housing
Development Company in respect of land bearing
Sy.Nos.17/1, 18, 19, 20, 26 and 94 situated at
Hennur Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore, in all
measuring about 26 acres 12 guntas, the finding of
the learned single Judge is set aside. Liberty is
granted to the petitioners therein to make
appropriate application before the BDA for deleting
the said land from acquisition in view of the policy
decision of the Government dated 1.6.1995. On
such representation the BDA shall consider the
request and pass appropriate orders. In the event
their contention is upheld the said extent of land
shall stand excluded from acquisition. Otherwise
acquisition in respect of the said lands stand and
the BDA is at liberty to form the layout.”
(Emphasis supplied by this Court)

694
78. The aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench
came to be affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of
BONDU RAMASWAMY's case, with certain modifications and
clarifications as indicated thereunder:
“160. In view of the foregoing, we affirm the

directions of the Division Bench subject to the
following further directions and clarifications:
(i) In regard to the acquisition of lands in

Kempapura and Srirampura, BDA is
directed to reconsider the objections to the
acquisitions having regard to the fact that
large areas were not initially notified for
acquisition, and more than 50% of
whatever that was proposed for acquisition
was also subsequently deleted from
acquisition. BDA has to consider whether
in view of deletions to a large extent,
whether development with respect to the
balance of the acquired lands has become
illogical and impractical, and if so, whether
the balance area also should be deleted
from acquisition. If BDA proposes to
continue the acquisition, it shall file a
report within four months before the High
Court so that consequential orders could
be passed.
(ii) In regard to villages of Venkateshapura,

Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where
there are several very small pockets of
acquired lands surrounded by lands which
were not acquired or which were deleted
from the proposed acquisition, BDA may
consider whether such small pockets
should also be deleted if they are not
suitable for forming self-contained
Layouts. The acquisition thereof cannot be
justified on the ground that these small
islands of acquired land, could be used as
a stand-alone park or playground in regard
to a Layout formed in different
695
unconnected lands in other villages.

Similar isolated pockets in other villages
should also be dealt with in a similar
manner.
(iii) BDA shall give an option to each writ

petitioner whose land has been acquired
for Arkavati Layout:
(a) to accept allotment of 15% (fifteen

percent) of the land acquired from
him, by way of developed plots, in lieu
of compensation (any fractions in
excess of 15% may be charged
prevailing rates of allotment).
OR
(b) in cases where the extent of land
acquired exceeds half an acre, to
claim in addition to compensation
(without prejudice to seek reference if
he is not satisfied with the quantum),
allotment of a plot measuring 30' x
40' for every half acre of land
acquired at the prevailing allotment
price.
(iv) Any allotment made by BDA, either by

forming Layouts or by way of bulk
allotments, will be subject to the above.”
(Emphasis supplied by this Court)
78.1 Thus, it can be noticed from the order of Division
Bench that an olive branch was extended to the bonafide
purchasers of sites from BDA, from House Building
Cooperative Societies, as well as owners of those lands which
was acquired for the purposes of formation of Arkavati Layout.
It came to be held that in the event of parameters laid
thereunder were to be satisfied by the respective site

696
owner/land owners, as the case may be, such of those persons
would be entitled to the relief sought for. In fact, the Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case supra having
upheld the decision of Division Bench issued certain directions
to the BDA in the concluding paragraph-160, which is already
noticed hereinabove to salvage the acquisition and to avoid
hardships to BDA and its allottees and to avoid prolonged
further rounds of litigation emanating from the directions of
the High Court, in order to uphold the decision of the Division
Bench, but subject to BDAs actions to certain corrective
measures by requiring it to reexamine take certain aspects and
provide an option to the land losers to secure some additional
benefit, as an incentive to accept the acquisition.
78.2 Thus, acquisition of the land for Arkavati Layout
having been upheld by the Division Bench of this court and
affirmed by the Apex Court, question of re-examining the said
issue in these writ petitions would not arise. However, it
requires to be noticed that a valiant attempt has been made by
the writ petitioners to contend that on account of
representations submitted by the petitioners/land losers under
Section 17(5) of BDA Act, Notification issued under Section

697
19(1) of BDA Act is bad in law. It requires to be noticed at this
juncture itself that said Notification was issued pursuant to
order of the Division Bench as affirmed in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case resulting in re-modified scheme of
Arkavati Layout being sanctioned. The representations
submitted by the land losers having been considered by the
BDA, ipso facto does not wipe out the impugned Notification.
It also requires to be noticed that representations of the land
losers was considered, as directed by the Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.
78.3 Yet another contention which has been raised is
that BDA Act does not provide for second Notification. In fact,
Notification dated 18.06.2014 is not a SFN and it is a
misnomer. It could be seen from the records that enquiry
came to be conducted by the BDA pursuant to directions
issued by the Division Bench as well as by the Apex Court and
report was submitted to the Government, which resulted in
983.36 of lands being deleted and an extent of 1766 acres was
retained. In fact, the scheme which was sanctioned earlier,
stood modified by the Government. The expression and words
found in the impugned Notification 18.06.2014 is a complete

698
answer to the contentions raised by the petitioners and same
reads:
“Whereas the Government of Karnataka

has approved a Re-modified Scheme for the
formation of Arkavati Layout vide
Government Order No.
UDD/426/MNJ/2011, Bangalore, dated:
03.04.2014 in modification of the Scheme
sanctioned vide Government Order No. UDD
193 MNX 2004, Bangalore, dated
21.02.2014.”
78.4 Hence, contention raised that Notification dated
18.06.2014 is bad in law on account of BDA Act not providing
for the same, is rejected. It would not be out of context to
state that Notification in question is a replacement of earlier
Notification based on the re-modified scheme. Particularly
when acquisition having been upheld subject to the
modifications, clarifications and directions issued, resulting in
appropriate Government issuing a modified Notification, would
not wipe out the acquisition proceedings itself. The impugned
Notification only replaces the earlier Notification. A reference
has been made to Section 3 and 7 of the Land Acquisition Act,
1894, in the impugned Notification and as such impugned
Notification is liable to be set aside, since it is under a repealed
New Act, is an argument which requires to be brushed aside

699
for two (2) reasons; firstly, impugned Notification is only
replacement of the earlier Notification, which was on account
of directions issued by the Apex Court; secondly, under
Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, Act prior to 2013 is
indeed saved. In fact, power to amend is always available to
the Government, inasmuch as, power to issue would include
power to amend, vary or rescind the Notifications and orders in
terms of Section 21 of General Clauses Act. In the matter of
M.P.GANGADHARAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF
KERALA AND OTHERS reported in (2006) 6 SCC 162 the
Hon’ble Apex Court has held:
"14. In terms of Section 21 of the General

Clauses Act, 1897, (corresponding to the
relevant provisions in the Interpretation and
General Clauses Act, 1925) the power to issue
would include the power to amend, vary or
rescind, Notifications and orders. If a
Notification could be issued establishing a
Family Court at Manjeri, we do not see any
reason why another Notification cannot be
issued by the State to shift the said court to
another place but within the same area of the
Family Court. In terms of Section 21 of the
General Clauses Act, the State Government will
indisputably have jurisdiction to abolish a
Family Court and establish one at another
place. If such an extensive jurisdiction can be
exercised by the State, we fail to comprehend as
to why its jurisdiction should be held to be
limited in the matter of shifting of court from
one place to another but within the same area,
particularly, in view of the fact that in terms of
700
sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Act even a

change in the area is permissible."
79. Successive Final Notifications for acquisition of
land on behalf of BDA is permissible and this Court in
W.P.No.16590/2004 disposed on 19.11.2013 has held that
BDA is empowered to issue SFN. It has been further held:
“8. In so far as WP 27731/2012 is concerned, it

is contended that the Scheme has been substantially
implemented and hence the petitioners are estopped
from questioning the same.
In the light of the above contentions, the points

that would arise for consideration are as follows :
i.) Has the Scheme, pursuant to which the

acquisition proceedings had been
initiated, lapsed by virtue of non-
implementation of the same vis-à-vis the
lands of the petitioners herein.
ii.) Whether the State government is enabled

to issue successive Notifications under
Section 19 of the BDA Act.
It is to be noticed that a common ground raised

in all the petitions is that the Scheme sanctioned and
approved by the State government under Section
18(3) of the BDA Act has not been implemented even
after long lapse of time and much beyond the period,
within which it ought to have been implemented, as
contemplated under Section 27 of the said Act. It is
also the common ground that the possession of the
respective extents of land has remained with the
petitioners. Though that fact is sought to be disputed
by the BDA, it is not the case of the BDA that it has
developed any layout over any of the said lands. In
WP 27731/2012, the BDA has not even claimed to
have taken possession of the land in question.
701
The following observations of a learned single

judge in the case of R. Adikesavulu Naidu v. the State
of Karnataka , ILR 2011 Kar 3657, are relevant :
"90. Insofar as the acquisition proceedings

are concerned, even on admitted facts and by
the operation of Section 27 of the BDA Act, if
the scheme has lapsed even before the stage
of the lands notified for acquisition vesting in
the State and taking possession of the
subject land after passing of the Award had
not been reached, it is obvious that the
acquisition proceedings get aborted due to
the scheme lapsing and if the subject land
notified for acquisition had not vested in the
State within a period of five years from the
date of issue of the Final Notification a period
within which the scheme is required to be
implemented substantially to avoid the
scheme lapsing in terms of Section 27 of the
BDA Act, in law even assuming for argument
sake, award is passed, possession is taken
after expiry of this period as a matter of fact
under the enabling provisions of Section
11 of the LA Act to pass an award and the
further enabling provision of section 16 of
the LA Act for taking possession of the
subject land also, but these statutory
provisions being not available to the state
and the BDA any more due to Section 27 of
the Act whereafter alone the land vests
absolutely in the Government in the wake of
Section 36 of the BDA Act and if there is no
way in law to take the acquisition
proceedings also to its logical conclusion as
the original purpose of acquisition itself is
lost, it is obvious this is a situation attracting
legal consequence of not only the scheme
lapsing but also the acquisition proceedings
lapsing.
91. It is necessary to bear in mind the

distinction between the acquisition
proceedings being quashed at any stage of
the acquisition proceeding due to non-
adherence of the statutory provisions and the
702
procedure and a situation of the acquisition

proceedings per se lapsing due to the scheme
lapsing in terms of Section 27 of the BDA Act
and by that time if the acquisition
proceedings having not been completed and
therefore the acquisition proceedings being
left midway without completion and when
the matter is before the Court for
examination at the instance of persons
claiming interest in the subject lands, by a
sense of fairness, by a duty to act in a
constitutional manner, a duty to ensure that
the State and public bodies which is the
'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the
Constitution of India abide by the
constitutional provisions and statutory
provisions and do not give scope for
discriminatory act in respect of some persons
who are situated in a like position as others,
this Court is compelled to exercise its
constitutional writ jurisdiction for quashing
the proceedings and the orders of the State
and the authorities akin to the State which
are left incomplete, and which do not serve
any purpose any more leave alone serving a
public purpose and therefore writ of
certiorari should be issued to put an end to
this 'trishanku' stage of acquisition
proceedings by quashing the incomplete
acquisition proceedings."
As regards the contention that there could not be

successive Final Notifications under Section 19 of the
BDA Act is concerned, a learned single judge of this
court has considered the question in a particular
context and has held in the affirmative, in the case of
B. K. Nanjudaiah v. BDA , ILR 1987 Kar 2977. The
petitioners in that case claimed to be the owners of
land in Survey No.16 of Malagalu village, Bangalore
North Taluk, measuring about 5 acres 20 guntas. The
land stood in the name of the father of the first
petitioner therein, on the death of the father of the
petitioner, there was a dispute between the
petitioners in respect of the land, which was the
subject matter of a civil suit in OS 222/1980, before
the Court of the Civil Judge, Bangalore. The same
703
stood settled under a compromise decree. Petitioner

no.1 was conferred 2 acres 30 guntas and Petitioners
2 and 3 together took 2 acres 30 guntas , in terms of
the compromise. The said land along with several
other lands were notified for acquisition under the
BDA Act, for the formation of the Nagarabhavi II
Stage layout. A Preliminary Notification was
published in the gazette dated 26-8-1982. A Final
Notification was issued on 5-8-1986. The same was
challenged. One of the grounds of challenge was that,
since the State government had published a Final
Notification in respect of Nagarbhavi I Stage layout,
as on 16-8-1985 - pursuant to the Preliminary
Notification dated 26-8-1982,the State
government had no competence to issue a second
Final Notification on the basis of the same
Preliminary Notification. In that, it was contended
that since the petitioners' lands did not find mention
in the first Final Notification dated 16-9-1985, the
State government must be deemed to have
abandoned the scheme. State of MP v. Vishnu Prasad,
AIR 1966 SC 1593, was cited in support of the
argument. The apex court had held thus in Vishnu
Prasad:
"There is nothing in Ss, 4, 5-A and 6 to

suggest that S.4(1) is a kind of reservoir from
which the government may from time to time
draw out land and make declarations with
respect to it successively. If that was the
intention behind sections 4, 5-A and 6 we
would have found some indication of it in the
language used therein. But as we read these
three sections together we can only find that
the scheme is that S.4 specifies the locality,
then there may be survey and drawing of maps
of the land and the consideration whether the
land is adapted for the purpose for which it has
to be acquired, followed by objections and
making up of its mind by the government what
particular land out of that locality it needs. This
is followed by a declaration under S.6
specifying the particular land needed and that
in our opinion completes the process and the
Notification under S.4(1) cannot be further
used thereafter. At the stage of S.4 the land is
704
not particularised but only the locality is

mentioned; at the stage of S.6 the land in the
locality is particularised and thereafter it seems
to us that the Notification under S.4(1) having
served its purpose exhausts itself. The
sequence of events from a Notification of the
intention to acquire [S.4(1)] to the declaration
under S.6 unmistakably leads one to the
reasonable conclusion that when once a
declaration under Section 6 particularising the
area out of the area in the locality specified in
the Notification under Section 4(1) is issued,
the remaining non-particularized area stands
automatically released."
Negating the argument, the learned judge, while

interpreting the scope of Section 19 - laid down as
follows :
"13. xxx xxxx Section 19, on which the
arguments is constructed, reads thus:
"19. Upon sanction, declaration to be
published giving particulars of land to be
acquired- (1) Upon sanction of the
scheme, the Government shall publish in
the official Gazette declaration stating the
fact of such sanction and that the
land proposed to be acquired by the
Authority for the purposes of the scheme
is required for a public purpose."
14. It is seen from sub-section (1) of this

Section that the declaration to be published in
the official Gazette has to mention the land
proposed to be acquired by the authority for the
purpose of the scheme and such declaration
shall state the limits, for which is needed and its
approximate area and the place where a plan of
the land may be inspected. There is nothing in
the Act from which it can be culled out that
acquisition of part of the area comprised in the
scheme would render the entire scheme to lapse
though the remaining area which is already
contemplated in this scheme under the Act is
not acquired at that stage, the scheme lapses if
there is no substantial compliance with the
scheme within five years as contemplated
705
by Section 27. No other provision in the Act

mentions about the lapsing of the scheme.
Therefore it is difficult to appreciate that by
acquiring some portions of the lands in the
scheme, the entire scheme lapses. It has to be
remembered that the B.D.A. is required to under
take development work from time to time since
it has to incur expenditure and has to execute
the developmental schemes. This takes me to the
definition of the words 'development and
engineering operations' provided in clause (2)(j)
and (k), which reads thus:
"(j) 'development' with its grammatical

variations means the carrying out of
building, engineering, or other operations
in or over or under land or the making of
any material change in any building or
land and includes redevelopment;
(k) 'engineering operations' means
formation or laying out of means of
access to road".
The above scheme is framed for achieving

the objects for which the authority is constituted
as per Section 14 of the Act. This object,
obviously cannot be achieved at one stretch and
requires to be achieved by stages.”
15. In the instant case, by declaration dated

16.8.1985 and 7.9.1985, an extent of 357
acres and 2 guntas in Nagarbhavi village and
163 acres 14 guntas in Malagalu village was
sought to be acquired for Nagarbhavi I stage and
by Notification dated 5.8.1986, an extent of 292
acres 5 guntas in Nagarbhavi village and 312
acres 5 guntas in Malagalu was sought to be
acquired. This has to be resorted to because
without completing the I stage, the authorities
could not have undertaken the development
work as defined, for the II stage."
The question again arose for consideration in

relation to acquisition proceedings under the
provisions of the Karnataka Industrial Area
Development Act, 1966 (Hereinafter referred to as the
706
'KIAD Act', for brevity), namely, whether successive

Final Notifications under Section 28(4) of the KIAD
Act, could be issued. A division bench of this court
dealing with the issue in WA 3189-3201/2010 and
connected cases, dated 20-11-2012, has held that
with the amendment to Section 5-A and 6 of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894, the basis of the judgment in
Vishnu Prasad Sharma's case was taken away. And
that as the law stands to-day, it was permissible to
make successive Notifications under Section 6(1) of
the LA Act. By the issuance of a Notification under
the said provision, in respect of only a portion of the
land which is the subject matter of Section 4(1), the
said Preliminary Notification would not lapse in
respect of other provisions of the land in respect of
which 6 (1) Notification is not issued.
While addressing the argument that as there

were no corresponding amendments to the KIAD Act,
as brought about under the LA Act and therefore the
dictum in Vishnu Prasad Sharma yet being drawn
into service, the division bench on an elaborate
analysis of the relevant provisions has held thus :
"19. Therefore, from the aforesaid

provisions as well as from the discussion as
above, it is clear the Apex Court in Vishnu
Prasad Sharma's case was constrained to
hold that successive declarations are not
permissible because Section 5A of the Land
Acquisition Act provided for consideration
of all objections made to the Notification
under Section 4(1) and one report thereafter
to the Government. Similarly the
Government after considering the report
made under Section 5A had to make up its
mind whether particular land is needed for
public purpose or not and then issue a
declaration under Section 6(1).
Correspondingly there is no provision in the
Act for considering all objections made to
the Notification under Section 28(1) of the
Act. There is no provision for submission of
one report to the Government. There is no
provision for consideration of any such
report by the Government before issuing a
707
declaration under section 28(4) of the Act.

On the contrary, the language of the Act
makes it very clear the Government has to
consider the cause shown by the owner of
the land and may pass such order as it
deems fit and if it is satisfied that any such
land should be acquired for the purpose
specified in the Notification, it may issue a
declaration. In the light of the marked
difference in the language employed
in Section 28, there is no scope for holding
that successive Notifications are not
permissible in law. In fact the legislature
did not amend the Act because in the Act
the provisions similar to consideration of all
objections together, submission of a report
and consideration of a report and issuing
Final Notification are conspicuously
missing. If those words had been there and
if they had not been amended, then the
judgment of the Apex Court would have to
be applied with full force. Therefore, merely
because the State legislature did not bring
about any amendment as was done by the
Parliament, it would in no way support the
case of the petitioners. Such an amendment
in the facts of this case was wholly
unnecessary.
20. In the light of what is stated above

we are of the view that the learned Single
Judge was justified in holding that under
the Act, issuance of successive declarations
is permissible. It is not out of place to
mention here the acquisition of land under
the Act is for an industrial purpose. Under
the scheme of the Act first a Notification
has to be issued under Section 3(1) of the
Act specifying the area to be an industrial
area for the purpose of this Act. Section
3 reads as under:
3. Declaration of industrial areas:
(1) The State Government may, by

Notification, declare any area in the State to
708
be an industrial area for the purposes of

this Act.
(2) Every such Notification shall define the
limits of the area to which it relates.
21. The object of this provision is to

inform the public that the State
Government has taken a decision to form
an industrial estate in a particular area, so
that the said area may not be used for any
other purpose. In fact, Section 4 of the Act
specifically provides for alteration of
industrial area after issue of a Notification
under Section 3(1) of the Act specifying and
declaring any area in the State to be an
industrial area. The power is vested
under Section 4 of the Act to exclude from
any industrial area, any area or include
therein any additional area as may be
specified in such Notification. That is the
only mode by which an area which is
declared as an industrial area can be
excluded from the industrial area. Though
the Act came into force from 26th Day of
May 1966, Chapter-VII of the Act which
deals with acquisition and disposal of land
were not made applicable to the entire state
of Karnataka. It is only when a land is to be
acquired for the purpose of industrial
development, after issue of a Notification
under Section 3(1) of the Act, Notification
has to be issued under Section 1(3) of the
Act making Chapter-VII applicable. After
Chapter-VII is made applicable to a
particular area, then the Government is
vested with the power under Section
28(1) of the Act to issue a Notification
expressing its intention to acquire such
land. When such a land is notified it is not
as if every owner of the land would object to
the acquisition. There are number of owners
of the land who may be willing to give their
consent to acquisition of the land and
accept compensation payable under the Act.
At the same time the very object of enacting
this Act is establishment and development
709
of industrial area and for making available

industrial land to the private entrepreneurs
to start industries. If a land owner chooses
to challenge the acquisition, certainly it
takes time before the acquisition is
completed. Therefore, under the scheme it
is open to the Government to issue a
Notification under Section 28(4) in respect
of lands where there is no opposition to the
acquisition or where they are able to serve
the land owners, consider their objections
and issue Notification for acquisition. If
there is any delay in service of notice, if
there are contests and any order of stay or
injunction is obtained from Courts, it is not
necessary for the Government to wait for
conclusion of those proceedings before it
could issue a Notification under Section
28(4) of the Act. That is precisely the reason
why as is clear from the language employed
in Sections 28(3) and (4), the Government is
empowered to consider the cause shown by
each owner and pass appropriate orders
and issue declarations in respect of such
owners under Section 28(4) of the Act. It
serves the object of the Act. Similarly it also
enables the owners of the land who are
consenting for acquisition to get
compensation expeditiously. Therefore, seen
from all angles the legislature has
consciously avoiding the pit falls which were
found in the unamended provisions
of Section 6 and 5A of the Act and to enable
the Government to acquire land piece meal
by issue of such successive Notifications
have not adopted the procedure prescribed
under the unamended Sections 6 and 5A of
the L.A. Act. In that view of the matter we
do not see any substance in the first
contention.”
9. In the light of the views expressed herein

above, it may be said that there is no provision
under the BDA Act, to indicate that upon issuance
of a Final Notification and acquisition of a part of
the area comprised in the Scheme, that the other
710
lands covered under the Scheme would not be

available for acquisition and that a second Final
Notification is impermissible. As in any event, the
Scheme would lapse if there is no substantial
compliance with the Scheme.
10. In the result, the above points for

consideration are answered as follows :
The petitioners having demonstrated that

though the lands of the petitioners were duly
notified for acquisition, the possession of the lands
having remained with the petitioners, even without
the benefit of any interim orders of this court, and
the Scheme under which the lands had been sought
to be acquired, not having been substantially
implemented, in so far as the petitioners' lands are
concerned, the Scheme to that extent would lapse
and the lands of the petitioners except to such
extent as has not vested with the State, (the
admitted extent of land, utilized for the formation of
road- in WP 16590/2004) is no longer available for
acquisition under the impugned Notifications.
11. There is no impediment in law for the State

to issue successive Notifications under Section
19 (1) of the BDA Act, but the succeeding
Notification shall disclose valid and justifiable
reason for such issuance. It is ideal for the State to
ensure Finality in the issuance of a "Final
Notification" in respect of the proposed acquisition
as it would enable other land owners to proceed on
the presumption that their land, which may have
been initially notified, is outside the purview of the
acquisition proceedings. Therefore, the State shall
not normally resort to successive Final Notifications
unless the land owners are forewarned of further
impending Notifications. As seen in Nanjundaiah's
case above, the State could very well have indicated
that the remaining lands which were not notified in
the "first" Final Notification are subject to be notified
before the expiry of five years from the date of the
Preliminary Notification.”
711
80. The issue relating to inclusion of 500 acres of
Government land, inclusive of ‘B’ Kharab land without an
order being passed under Section 97 of the Karnataka Land
Revenue Act for diverting the said lands for formation of
Layout, is an issue between the Government and BDA and
necessarily the tank beds and ‘B’ Kharab lands will have to be
retained.
80.1 The contention relating to New Act being applicable
on account of award having not been passed and possession
has not been taken and therefore under Section 24(2) of the
New Act acquisition lapses, is an argument requires to be
considered for the purposes of rejection, inasmuch as,
acquisition having already been upheld by the Apex Court and
scheme having been formulated by the BDA for allotment of
developed land in the ratio of 60:40. In fact, 15% of the
developed plots has been ordered to be allotted to the land
owners and the Government Circular to allot plots to land
owners in the ratio of 60:40, payment of compensation does
not arise.
80.2 One another contention raised is that acquisition
lapsed under Section 27 of the BDA Act. Even when scheme
lapses under Section 27 of the BDA Act, acquisition does not

712
lapse as held by the Apex Court in the matter of OFFSHORE
HOLDINGS (P) LTD vs BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY & ORS reported in (2011) 3 SCC 139:
“38. On a conjunctive reading of the provisions

of Sections 27 and 36 of the State Act, it is clear that
where a scheme lapses, the acquisition may not.
This, of course, will depend upon the facts and
circumstances of a given case. Where, upon
completion of the acquisition proceedings, the land
has vested in the State Government in terms of
Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, the
acquisition would not lapse or terminate as a result of
lapsing of the scheme under Section 27 of the BDA
Act. An argument to the contrary cannot be accepted
for the reason that on vesting, the land stands
transferred and vested in the State/Authority free
from all encumbrances and such status of the
property is incapable of being altered by fiction of law
either by the State Act or by the Central Act. Both
these Acts do not contain any provision in terms of
which property, once and absolutely, vested in the
State can be reverted to the owner on any condition.
There is no reversal of the title and possession of the
State. However, this may not be true in cases where
acquisition proceedings are still pending and land
has not been vested in the Government in terms of
Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act.”
Thus, what requires to be examined is:
“Whether the BDA has complied with the

directions issued by the Division Bench as
clarified and further directions issued by
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case?”
and consequentially it has to be examine the nature of exercise
that was undertaken by the BDA.

713
81. A plain reading of direction issued by the Division
Bench would indicate that a Memo was filed during the course
of hearing of the appeal by producing the maps of the area
showing lands in the village which are not notified, lands
which were notified under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, lands
which are notified under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act and said
areas depicted in different colours. On account of lands which
was proposed to be acquired did not form a contiguous area,
and in some of the village certain extent of lands notified under
the Final Notification were surrounded by large chunk of area,
which was not acquired, making access to said land difficult,
which was found to be heart-burning and as such BDA was
confronted with those hard facts. Contents of the said memo
reads:
"Memo filed by Appellant, the

Bangalore Development Authority:
1. Without prejudice to the submission that

there is no discrimination in the matter of
deletion of lands in the Final Notification
and that deletion of certain lands will not
invalidate either the Preliminary or the Final
Notifications, it is submitted as follows.
2. If this Hon'ble Court were to come to the

conclusion that the objections of certain
landowners/writ petitioners to the Final
Notification are to be considered afresh by
the Bangalore Development Authority,
714
directions on the following lines may kindly

be issued.
3. The writ petitioners who are landowners

seeking dropping of the acquisition
proceedings insofar as their respective lands
are concerned, on the ground that: (a) their
lands are situated within green belt area; (b)
they are totally built up; (c) properties
wherein there are buildings constructed by
charitable, educational and/or religious
institutions; (d) nursery lands; (e) who have
set up factories, may be permitted to make
appropriate application to the BDA seeking
reconsideration for exclusion of their lands
from acquisition by producing documents to
substantiate their contentions within one
month from the date of the order.
3.1 The BDA will consider such requests

keeping in mind the status of the property
as on the date of Preliminary Notification.
Properties developed, improved, constructed
upon, subsequent to the Preliminary
Notification will not be considered for
deletion.
3.2 The writ petitioners whose revenue sites

have been acquired they shall be allotted
with the site of 30 ft. x 40 ft. dimension in
terms of the order/direction of this Hon'ble
Court dated 20-7-2001 passed in W.P.
Nos.20875 to 20938 of 2001 (Anjanapura
Scheme).
3.3 The writ petitioners/landowners shall make

appropriate applications within 30 days
from the date of this order and thereafter
the authority shall consider the applications
and pass appropriate orders within period of
three months.”
82. As observed hereinabove, BDA was required to
undertake the exercise of examining the claims of respective

715
parties as directed thereunder. BDA was also required to
comply with further directions and clarifications issued by the
Apex Court. In other words, it had to ascertain whether the
claim of applicants would fall within the four corners of
parameters fixed by the Division Bench as well as by the
Hon’ble Apex Court. In this direction BDA has undertaken the
mammoth exercise of conducting spot inspection, ascertaining
the age of buildings existing, if any (namely, as to whether
such buildings came up before issuance of Preliminary
Notification or after issuance thereof) and the Special Land
Acquisition Officers have submitted their reports. In fact,
some of the reports which have been filed have been also
challenged and/or attacked in these writ petitions on the
ground of they being contrary to the factual matrix. We have
already enumerated as to how some of the reports are either
being erroneous or being contrary to facts.
82.1 This Court in exercise of the writ jurisdiction under
Article 226 or in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of
Constitution of India would not be in a position to fathom the
truth or otherwise of such exercise undertaken by BDA. It
would also be necessary to note at this juncture that after
issuance of Preliminary Notification sites have been purchased

716
from the erstwhile owners. There are instances where even
prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification, revenue sites
have been purchased by few of the petitioners and they are
said to have put up constructions. There are instances where
the construction put up are in accordance with the building
plan or licence issued by Municipal Authority, Corporation or
Council, as the case may be. In fact, direction issued by the
Division Bench to BDA is to either consider for regularization
or dropping of such portions of lands/sites from acquisition,
who had purchased the same prior to issuance of Preliminary
Notification.
82.2 Some of the petitioners who have been allotted sites
in these lands, which were at one point of time notified and
subsequently denotified in the light of exercise undertaken by
virtue of order passed by Division Bench and the order
upholding acquisition with certain directions and clarification
issued by Hon’ble Apex Court, such allottees have sought for
alternate site in the very same Layout. There may be
instances where such allottees would have already constructed
building/s and have been residing in such building/s by
themselves or through their tenants or might have sold the
property and thereby third party rights having crept in. Even
717
in such circumstances, BDA cannot be heard to contend that
they would not look into those aspects or turn blind eye. In
this regard suitable direction will have to be issued.
82.3 Petitioner in W.P.No.5228/2015 has been allotted a
site bearing No.141 formed in Sy.No.17/1 of Hennur Village,
Arkavati Layout measuring East to West 15 meters and North
to South 24 meters and totally measuring 360 sq.mtrs. as
morefully described in schedule to the petition. Pursuant to
said allotment, Lease-cum-Sale agreement was executed in his
favour on 28.05.2007 (Annexure-A) and possession came to be
delivered pursuant to which Khata was mutated in his name
by the respondent-BDA on 20-06-2007 vide Annexures-B & C
respectively. Petitioner approached respondent – BDA for
approval of building plan and accordingly, it was approved and
licence was granted as per Annexures-D & E respectively. As
is evident from photographs –Annexure-F, building has been
constructed which includes residential building on the rear
side. In fact, petitioner had borrowed loan from State Bank of
India in a sum of Rs.20 lakhs for construction of the house,
which is also evident from consent letter issued by the State
Bank of India on 03.07.2008–Annexure-Q. The total
expenditure incurred for putting up construction on the said

718
site as certified by the Civil Engineer dated 11.04.2008 -
Annexure-R as well as payments made when the construction
was in progress is reflected in the statement produced at
Annexure-S and such payments were made by petitioner
through cheques.
82.4 In this factual scenario, where building has come
up in the site allotted by respondent-BDA in favour of
petitioner, he was into a surprise or shock when land in which
site had been carved out and allotted by BDA having been de-
notified. As such, for quashing of de-Notification process and
to declare that respondents-1 to 5 have no right whatsoever to
demolish the portion of petition schedule property formed in
Sy.No.17/1 of Hennur village and to declare that impugned
Final Notification dated 18.06.2014 as illegal and arbitrary,
petitioner is before this Court.
83. Though petitioner in W.P.No.5228/2015 has
sought for quashing of Final Notification dated 18.06.2014,
this court is not inclined to entertain the said prayer for
reasons more than one.
83.1 Firstly, issuance of Notification for acquiring the
lands specified under said Notification has been upheld by the
Division Bench and affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case

719
of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case. Secondly, land in which
petitioner’s site has been carved out and allotted to him by the
BDA has been de-notified in favour of the owners of land and
they not being parties to the present proceedings, as said
prayer cannot be considered.
83.2 However, the fact remains that pursuant to Final
Notification dated 21.02.2004 whereunder, an extent of 2750
acres of land was sought to be acquired for the purpose of
formation of Layout, land in question has been acquired and
sites have also been stated to be formed, pursuant to which,
allotments were made, Lease-cum-Sale Agreements were
executed, khata was mutated in the names of allottees and
tax has been collected from allottees. Further, plan submitted
by allottees for construction of buildings has also been
approved and license granted to put up construction.
However, under the guise of undertaking re-do exercise
pursuant to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, an extent of 983.12
acres have been deleted either by way of de-notifying the lands
or on account of some of land owners having approached this
court for quashing of the proceedings and having obtained
orders in their favour or said lands being deleted from
acquisition proceedings for the reasons indicated in the orders

720
passed denotifying certain land. But, fact remains that 983.12
acres have been deleted from acquisition out of 2750 acres,
which was the subject matter of Final Notification dated
21.02.2004. In the photograph which has been produced at
Annexure-F by the petitioner has been perused by this Court,
which would clearly indicate that except building of the
petitioner, surrounding lands which can be seen seems to be
more than several acres which are lying fallow and vacant and
yet same has been denotified. The circumstances in which
lands have been denotified cannot be beyond the parameters
fixed by the Division Bench as well by Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. However, on perusal of records
made available by the BDA and various reports, it would
disclose that in several cases where Special Land Acquisition
Officer has undertaken the exercise of visiting the spot along
with Revenue Inspectors has recommended for de-notifying the
lands and BDA on the ground that there is inconsistency
between the said report as well as report of the Assistant
Commissioner, has not accepted the reports of the Special
Land Acquisition Officer and thereby has not deleted or
denotified certain lands. However, intriguing circumstances
this case would unfold is the fact that large tracts of lands
721
though vacant, not developed and not falling within the
parameters fixed by the Division Bench and the Hon’ble Apex
Court has also been deleted or de-notified. It is in this
background, exercise so undertaken by the BDA requires to be
scrutinized at micro level.
84. Sri Somashekhar, learned Advocate appearing for
petitioner in W.P.No.7248/2019 would contend that in the
land bearing Sy.No.79 measuring 4 acres of Dasarahalli
village, revenue sites have been formed way back in the year
1994. He would also contend that surrounding lands have
been deleted and denotified namely, Sy.Nos,45, 75, 47 & 34
bounded East, West, North and South respectively and as
such, he is entitled to the relief as specified in paragraph 160(i)
of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case. He would also contend that
Division Bench has extended the relief to revenue site holders
and similar relief deserves to be granted to the petitioners. He
would also submit that site owners have already constructed
residential buildings and are residing therein and the fact that
betterment charges have been paid and plan having been
sanctioned by the jurisdictional Gram Panchayat would clearly
indicate that petitioners are revenue site owners and as such,
they are entitled to the relief granted by Division Bench.

722
85. Per contra, Sri K N Puttegowda, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA would support the impugned
Notifications and contends that writ petitions itself are not
maintainable since they are not filed by the aggrieved person
but by association.
85.1 Working plan insofar as P.Dasarahally village
would indicate that Sy.No.79 is bounded on North by
Sy.No.47/7 and 47/8, which have already been acquired and
on eastern side, it is bounded by Sy.No.45, which has been
acquired and Sy.No.34/1 situated on the southern side itself
was either deleted or denotified and so also, land situated on
the western side bearing Sy.No.77. Present petitions are
common writ petitions filed by the association on behalf of
members who are 28 in number and court fee has been paid
accordingly. As such, contention regarding maintainability of
writ petitions stands rejected.
85.2 Petitioners have contended that they have put up
construction over the sites allotted to them except sporadic
construction put up in different plots. It cannot be conclusively
held that on the basis of documents made available, that in
the sites purchased by the petitioners are fully built.

723
the petitioners in W.P.No.37478/2017 & W.P.No.37480/2017
that sites have been formed by the erstwhile owners in the
land bearing Sy.No.104/6 situated at Rachenahalli Village,
K.R.Puram Hobli, after duly converted from agricultural
purposes to non-agriculture residential purposes way back on
23.04.1992 as per Annexure-B and they are in possession and
enjoyment of the said sites and they have obtained khata from
jurisdictional municipal authorities. It is also contended that
even BBMP has issued khata and collected taxes for the year
2017-18. He would submit that there was an agreement
entered into between the erstwhile land owners and the Post
and Telecommunication Department’s Employees Co-operative
Housing Society Ltd and pursuant to same, Layout was formed
and sites have allotted/sold in favour of its members like the
petitioners and authorities having considered the said
representations of the society, as well as representations
submitted by the petitioners for de-notifying the said lands, as
it would pass the test prescribed under the directions issued
by the Division Bench, as clarified and directed by the Hon’ble
Apex Court in the BONDU RAMASWAMY's case and yet, steps
having not been taken by the BDA. They have prayed for
724
quashing the Preliminary and Final Notification insofar as
petitioners’ sites are concerned.
86.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned counsel
appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3-BDA would submit that
petitioners are not notified khatedars and they were not
parties to the earlier writ petition and they have not filed any
application seeking for re-conveying the sites they had
purchased. As such question of considering their claim at this
length of time, does not arise.
86.2 However, it is required to be noticed that in the
statement of objections filed on behalf of BDA insofar as
petitioners in W.P.Nos.37478/2017 & 37480/2017 are
concerned, is not only vague but also bereft of any particulars
whatsoever. General and omnibus statements have been made
in paragraph-11 of its statement of objections by denying the
fact that lands surrounding Sy.No.104/6 having been left out
from acquisition is not true. It is stated that petitioners’ land
does not come within the guidelines issued by the Division
Bench of this Court.
86.3 Averments made in paragraph-10 to 16 of the
statement of objections filed by BDA are generic in nature,
without any particulars, insofar as, Sy.No.104/6 except to the

725
extent stated in paragraph-11. It is very intriguing to notice
that in W.P.No.37478/2017, two sets of statement of
objections have been filed. One by the present counsel,
Sri.Sachin B.S. (filed on 29.06.2018) and other one filed by
Smt.A.D.Vijaya, previous counsel (filed on 16.07.2018). In
paragraph-8 of the statement of objections filed by Smt.
A.D.Vijaya, it is stated that request of the petitioner has been
considered and rejected by the Government. It is also admitted
that compensation amount has not been deposited on account
of pendency of the litigations. This itself would indicate as to
the manner in which the matters pending before Courts are
dealt with by the BDA. Even minimum requisite details which
requires to be considered on facts of each case has not been
furnished by the BDA. This would only indicate the
lackadaisical approach of the BDA in dealing with the cases
pending before the Court and also a mirror to the pedantic
approach which BDA adopts, which obviously for the reasons
to keep the litigations pending before the Courts and to ensure
that there is no end to such litigations.
86.4 These matters require to be examined from several
angles namely, the aspirants for sites who have applied with
the BDA and having been waiting eagerly for such allotments
726
from long number of years with a fond hope that they would be
able to construct a roof over their head and they have been
pursuing their claim by submitting application in attempts
and in some cases it can be seen applicants have made more
than ten attempts. Yet, they have not received any allotment
letters from BDA. On the other hand, certain land owners, site
owners including the owners of sites who have been allotted
sites by Housing Co-operative Society like PNT Employees
Housing Societies, Income Tax Department Employees’
Housing Society, Telecommunications Employees’ Housing
Society, Income Tax Department Officer’s Association and the
like and who have purchased such sites, have already put up
construction in the said sites and have been residing in the
said houses, have also knocked the doors of this Court and
running from pillar to post to save their valuable property.
Judgment of the Division Bench as well as judgment of Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case having come as a
succor to their vows has also not come to their rescue, as
observed herein above, either on account of non consideration
of their representation by the BDA or consideration of the
representation as an eye wash and rejecting it or non
consideration of the application with reference to the factual

727
matrix or not considering the application for denotifying as
having been built up as observed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case vide paragraph-
160(i)(ii) and this has resulted in several unwarranted
litigations and present litigations are such. In fact, in order to
put an end to all these litigations and to resolve the issue in a
transparent manner and to ensure that directions issued by
the Division Bench of this Court and further directions and
clarifications issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court, BDA was
directed to make their stand clear by explaining as to how they
propose to deal with these aspects referred to above and this
Court was expecting a positive stand from the BDA.
Unfortunately, in its usual rigmarole stand which it takes
before Courts, BDA has filed an affidavit through its
Commissioner on 12.06.2019 that too only when learned AGA
intervened in the matter and assured this Court such an
affidavit would be filed. It is stated in paragraph-4 of the
affidavit that there are 2608 revenue sites holders who have
approached the BDA by filing an application for regularization
of their sites or for payment of compensation or to give
alternate sites. However, stand of the BDA in respect of
revenue site holders is that those who have purchased sites

728
prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification would be governed
by the resolution dated 18.04.2017 passed by BDA for
regularization of their sites and in such cases, it has been
resolved that where BDA utilized revenue sites for formation of
layout and road, allotment would be made as per the
resolution dated 09.06.2017 namely, in terms of directions
issued in the case of JUNJAMMA AND OTHERS vs. THE
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY reported in ILR
2005 KAR 608 (for short "JUNJAMMA's case") alternative sites
to the revenue site holders would be given. They have also
enclosed resolution dated 18.04.2017 and 09.06.2017
forwarded to the appropriate Government for approval of its
resolutions. As noticed hereinabove, appropriate Government
is also dragging its feet not taking its stand either way, it
would only indicate that sufferings of the individual site
owners or land holders or prospective site allottees rights are
being put into jeopardy on account of attitude adopted by BDA
as well as appropriate Government. In fact, it would not have
been difficult for BDA to place on record with reference to each
of the writ petitions as to whether their claim would fall in any
of the category or conditions stipulated in judgment of Division
Bench or BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case as stated supra. If so,

729
the manner in which such consideration has taken place or
had been considered by the BDA or the net result of such
consideration. As noticed hereinabove the BDA seems too
eager and anxious to withhold such details or information from
being made available to the Court. Neither the statement of
objections filed nor affidavit of the Commissioner dated
12.06.2019 would disclose as to mode, manner and method in
which the representation of these two writ petitioners came to
be considered, dealt with and decided.
86.5 However, optimistic view of this Court has been
shattered on perusal of the affidavit filed by the Commissioner
of BDA, inasmuch as, said affidavit contains no particulars
regarding the manner in which BDA proposes to deal in
respect of different categories of applicants as ordered by
Division Bench and clarified by Apex Court. It is as bald as
baldness could be or as vague as vagueness could be. In fact,
BDA attempted to shirk from its responsibility by shifting the
responsibility on the Government and the communication
dated 18.04.2017 to 07.06.2019 would act as mirror to this
fact. In fact as to what steps BDA has taken subsequent to
the resolution dated 18.04.2017 till 18.03.2019, the affidavit is
silent. This would only indicate that when the matters are
730
taken up by the Courts, BDA has made attempts to show that
it has woken from its slumber and contend before the Court
that it is discharging its statutory obligation, which is not so,
inasmuch as, for past two years i.e., from 18.04.2017 to
18.03.2019, there seems to be no correspondence between the
Government and BDA. Though Government is party to all
these writ petitions, it is also dragging its feet and thereby,
resulting in rights of the parties being put into jeopardy i.e.,
rights of both sets of parties. This has to be necessarily termed
as colourable exercise of powers by the instrumentality of the
State like BDA.
87. On perusal of case papers relating to
W.P.No.57992/2015 it would disclose that after disposal of the
matter before the Division Bench, an affidavit came to be filed
by the petitioner and his brothers on 03.02.2017 declaring
that they own the property jointly. However, this petition has
been filed by one of the brothers and other co-owners are not
arrayed as parties to this petition. Records would also disclose
that undisputedly, Sy.No.118 which is on the northern side of
land in question was not notified for acquisition. So also,
Sy.No.115 situated on the western side. Taking this into
consideration, land bearing Sy.No.116 on the western side has

731
been deleted and land bearing Sy.No.94 situated on eastern
side is also deleted. This would only indicate that respondent-
BDA in terms of the directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, while undertaking exercise of re-
doing has dropped Sy.Nos.116 and 94 from the acquisition
proceedings. No reasons are forthcoming from the statement
of objections filed by respondent-BDA as to how land in
question would not form an isolated pocket or in other words,
as to why acquisition in respect of this isolated pocket
deserves to be continued. Representation dated 26.11.2013
(Annexure-E) has not been considered and disposed of by BDA
and there is no reference to the same in the statement of
objections filed.
87.1 Having regard to the facts obtained in
W.P.No.5276/2014, it is noticed that land bearing
Sy.No.13/34 measuring 22 guntas of Jakkur Village,
Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, is surrounded by
Sy.No.13/2 on the northern side, Sy.No.13/4 to the East,
Sy.No. 11/10 to the West and Sy.No.13/3B to the South,
which lands have been deleted. After BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case cited supra, while undertaking the exercise of re-doing
the whole process, the land in question alone is sought to be

732
acquired, which prima-facie would fall within the parameters
of paragraph 160(ii) of the directions issued by Hon’ble Apex
Court.
87.2 As to whether exercise undertaken by the BDA in
deleting adjacent lands Sy.Nos.13/2, 13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B
itself is in serious doubt.
87.3 While narrating the facts of respective writ petitions
hereinabove, it has already been noticed that thrust of
arguments of the land owners relate to non implementation of
the order of Division Bench as well as Apex Court, which can
be summarized as:
(a) Though adjacent lands have been denotified,

lands belonging to the writ petitioners have not
been denotified or dropped from the acquisition
proceedings;
(b) Claim made by the petitioners for deleting their
lands on the ground of lands in the vicinity have
been developed and as such those lands have
been deleted, was not considered by BDA.
Hence, petitioners have sought for deletion of their lands.
There is prima facie justification in such claims. However, at
the same time, it has to be noticed by this Court that
subsequent to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and under the

733
guise of implementing the said order, reports have been
furnished by the Land Acquisition Officer and by using pick
and choose method certain lands have been deleted from
acquisition either on the ground that it is built up or it is
landlocked, which is factually otherwise. This view of the
Court gets fortified from the following facts:
(i) In W.P.No.48880/2014 the petitioner therein

is claiming for deletion of 0.54 guntas of land
in Sy.No.85/3 of Amruthahalli Village,
Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk,
contending the lands on all the three sides
namely, lands situated in Sy.No.86, 84 and
115 on the northern, eastern and southern
side of Sy.No.85/3 has been deleted. The
working plan of Amruthahalli Village
produced by the BDA indicated that on all
the three sides of Sy.No.85/3 the lands have
not been acquired for Arkavathi Layout. In
the endorsement issued to the petitioner
therein it does not even disclose that the
exercise that has been undertaken by the
BDA was in pursuance to BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case.
(ii) Even in respect of Sy.No.103/3 and 103/4
which is the subject matter of
W.P.Nos.47823-824/2015 the lands
surrounded on eastern, western, northern
734
and southern side bearing no.103/5, 102/2,

103/2, 102/5 are either not the subject
matter of acquisition or it has been deleted.
(iii) Even in respect of property bearing
Sy.No.13/3A measuring 22 guntas situated
at Jakkur Village, Yelahanka Hobli, which is
surrounded by lands bearing Sy.No.13/2,
13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B have not been
notified for acquisition at all.
(iv) Insofar as land measuring 18 guntas
situated in Sy.No.81/3B of Rachenahalli
Village, K R Puram Hobli, Bangalore East
Taluk, which is the subject matter of
W.P.Nos.54358-59/2014 is concerned,
which is sought for being deleted on the
ground of adjacent lands having been
deleted when examined with reference to the
records, it would disclose that above said 18
guntas of land is bounded on East by
Sy.Nos.81/2A and 81/2B, West by halla and
Sy.Nos.82, 83/1, north by Sy.Nos.81/3B
and 84/2 and south by Sy.No.81/3A. These
three (3) lands have been notified for
acquisition.
88. Even according to BDA subsequent to FFN dated
23.02.2004 and prior to issuance of modified Notification
dated 18.06.2014, about 988 acres of land has been denotified
for which acceptable and justifiable reasons are lacking. To

735
put it differently, facts discussed hereinabove is contrary to the
stand of BDA.
89. In the light of aforestated facts, this Court is of the
considered view that these aspects will have to be dealt by
examining the claims afresh and for ensuring there is clear
and absolute transparency in the said process, it would be apt
and appropriate to constitute a Committee. The Committee is
accordingly constituted comprising of following three (3)
persons to look into the various aspects as indicated in the
order hereinabove and as also morefully indicated in the
operative portion of this order. The Committee shall comprise
of the following persons:
(1) Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana,

Former Judge-High Court of Karnataka
No.10/11, Manasa,
Singapore Gardens, Green Fields-1,
Gubbilala Gate, Kanakapura Road,
Bengaluru - 560 062 - - CHAIRMAN
(2) Sri.Sandeep Dave, IAS (Retd.),

Former Additional Chief Secretary
#N-73, Diamond District,
Old Airport Road,
Bengaluru-560 008 - - MEMBER
(3) Sri.N.S.Megharikh, IPS (Retd.)

Former Director General of Police-CID,
Economic Offences and Special Units
Government of Karnataka
#A-33, Legacy ESTILO,
Doddaballapur Road,
736
Avalahalli, Yelahanka,
Bengaluru - 560 064 - - MEMBER
90. The Commissioner-BDA shall be the Ex-Officio
Convener. This Court directs the Commissioner-BDA to
consult the Chairman and its Members of the Committee
and accordingly fix and pay the remunerations. BDA is
directed to provide the necessary assistance, transport
and other logistical support to the Chairman and
Members of the Committee for holding the meetings. The
Chairman of the Committee is authorized to appoint
requisite staff, if need be, on temporary basis to assist the
Committee in conducting the meetings and also fix their
salaries, which shall be paid by the BDA. The BDA is also
directed to provide necessary office space at its Head
Office for smooth functioning of the Committee within an
outer limit of three (3) weeks from today. The Committee
would be at liberty to take requisite assistance of any of
the employees of the BDA or the State Government
including Surveyors either from BDA or of the State
Government for the purposes of carrying out spot
inspection, marking, inspection, etc and for overall
implementation of this order.

737
91. For the reasons aforestated, I proceed to pass the
following:
ORDER
(i) The challenge made to the Notifications Nos.
BDA/COMMR, KLAO/LA9/104/2002-03,
BANGALORE, dated: 03.02.2003, No. UDD 193
MNX 2004, BANGALORE, dated: 23.02.2004
and No. UDD 426 MNJ/2011, BANGALORE,
dated 18.06.2014, stands rejected and
acquisition of the lands for the formation of
Arkavati Layout is upheld.
(ii) W.P.Nos.815/2016 c/w 6717/2016 is allowed
and writ of mandamus issues to the BDA –
respondent No.1 to conclude the allotment
process of site No.BK90, Arkavati Layout,
expeditiously, at any rate within an outer limit of
three months from the date of receipt of this
order. In the alternate, if site BK90 is not
available BDA shall allot alternate site and
execute Lease-cum-Sale Agreement in favour of
the petitioner, issue Possession Certificate and
deliver vacant possession of site so allotted,

738
expeditiously and at any rate within 30 days from
the date of issuing the endorsement to the
petitioner that site bearing No.BK90 not being
available. It is also made clear that within 7 days
from the date of this order, BDA shall intimate
petitioner as to whether site No.BK90 allotted to
him on 31.05.2016, is available or not.
(iii) W.P.Nos.47461/2016 & 48412-14/2016 are
hereby dismissed.
(iv) W.P.No.21361/2017 is allowed and writ of
mandamus issues to BDA directing the said
Authority to execute absolute sale deed in favour
of the petitioner expeditiously at any rate within
an outer limit of three (3) months from the date of
receipt of this order.
(v) W.P.No.751/2016 is allowed and writ of
mandamus issues to the BDA to allot a site
measuring 30’ x 40’ in favour of petitioner
expeditiously at any rate within an outer limit of
three (3) months from the date of receipt of this
order.
739
(vi) W.P.Nos.3178/2017 c/w 55737/2016,
10923/2015, 58734/2016, 15588/2017,
14868/2017, 30485/2017 & 59317/2016 and
similarly placed writ petitions stands disposed of
by directing the BDA to place the representations
of all the applicants/petitioners submitted for
allotment of sites for being considered by the
Committee constituted hereinabove. It is also
made clear that all such applications which have
been filed for allotment of sites under any of the
categories specified in the order of the Division
Bench or the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case shall be considered by the
Committee keeping in mind the directions issued
thereunder and subject to order passed at
paragraph (xiv) hereinbelow.
(vii) W.P.No.43194/2017 is hereby allowed in part
and a writ of mandamus issues to the BDA to
allot one (1) site in favour of the petitioner, the
measurement of which shall be same as indicated
in the Lease cum Sale Agreement executed in
favour of petitioner by BDA on 28.02.2007.

740
(viii) W.P.Nos.38463/2014, 19783-784/2018,
46766/2014, 47606/2014 & 48579/2014,
stands dismissed.
(ix) W.P.No.1876/2016 stands disposed of and BDA
is directed to place the representation of the
petitioner, who is a revenue site holder and all
similar representations/applications of the
revenue site holders before the Committee for
examining their claims in the background of
Division Bench judgment as affirmed by Apex
Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and as
undertaken in paragraph No.3.2 of the Memo
filed by the BDA before the Division Bench.
(x) W.P.No.29541/2015 is allowed in part and a writ
of mandamus issues to the BDA to execute the
Lease cum Sale Agreement in favour of the
petitioners in respect of site Nos.B9-SC-2201 and
B5-SF-2137, which sites have been allotted as
per allotment letters dated 09.11.2007
(Annexures-R2 and R3 respectively).
(xi) The applicants/writ petitioners who are claiming
relief based on sale transactions which has taken

741
place subsequent to issuance of Preliminary
Notification dated 03.02.2003, would not be
entitled to any protection or relief whatsoever and
their claim stands rejected.
(xii) It is also made clear that neither the Committee
nor the BDA would be required to examine or
consider the claim where dispute with regard to
title is involved.
(xiii) The BDA shall allot the site to all such applicants
in whose favour allotment had been made and
later cancelled on the ground of same site having
been allotted to two (2) persons or cancelled for
whatsoever reason like it has fallen in the land
deleted from acquisition and like reasons.
(xiv) All deletions or deNotification recommended by
the BDA or made by BDA or by the Government,
is subject to the certification or approval by the
Committee to the effect that such deletion of land
is in accordance with the law laid down by the
Division Bench and directions/clarifications
issued by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case.
742
(xv) It is also made clear that in the event of
applications or representations having not been
submitted by the applicant/s pursuant to the
order of the Division Bench or BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case, they would be at liberty to
submit the same to the BDA within one (1) month
from the date of this order and on receipt of said
representations or applications, it shall be placed
by the BDA before the Committee constituted
hereinabove within ten (10) days after expiry of
one (1) month.
(xvi) The civic amenities sites earmarked in the map/s
or Arkavati Layout Plans, if located as an isolated
plot or island and such plots if not being adjacent
or abutting to the sites formed in Arkavati
Layout, such lands may not be feasible for
acquisition and Committee would examine such
claims and based on physical verification and a
report shall be forwarded by the Committee to
BDA either to retain such lands for acquisition or
recommend for deletion as the case may be, upon

743
receipt of such report BDA shall take further
steps.
(xvii) A writ of mandamus issues to BDA to execute
Lease cum Sale Agreement and possession
certificate in favour of all such allottees, who had
been allotted sites and on account of pendency of
the present proceedings, further steps had not
been taken. The BDA shall also ensure that
katha of the sites so allotted and possession
delivered is issued in favour of such allottees. The
said exercise shall be undertaken by the BDA
forthwith and at any rate within an outer limit of
three (3) months from today.
(xviii) The BDA shall consider the claim of all such
allottees, who have been allotted site/s in
Arkavati Layout, but later cancelled due to redo
exercise and shall allot the site/s to such of those
applicants/allottees expeditiously and at any rate
within an outer limit of three (3) months from the
date of receipt of copy of this order and it is also
made clear that in the event of such site/s not
being available in Arkavati Layout, they shall be

744
allotted sites in any other Layout within the
timeframe stipulated hereinabove.
(xix) Registered agreement holders or agreement
holders together holding registered General Power
of Attorney namely, if such documents have come
into existence contemporaneously prior to
issuance of Preliminary Notification dated
03.02.2003, would be entitled to seek for
allotment of site from BDA and all such
applicants would be at liberty to submit
application/representations to BDA within one
(1) month from today and all such
representations received by the BDA shall be
placed before the Committee constituted by this
Court within ten (10) days after expirty of one (1)
month and on report being submitted by the
Committee, BDA would be at liberty to make
allotment of sites or issue endorsement assigning
the reasons for rejection of claim, if any.
(xx) The Committee constituted hereinabove shall
implement the order passed in
W.A.No.2624/2005 & connected matters on

745
25.11.2005 in the matter of THE
COMMISSIONER, BDA AND OTHERS vs. STATE
OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS and order passed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4097/2010
and connected matters on 05.05.2010 in the
matter of BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHERS
vs. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS
and in addition to the same, said Committee
shall also:
(a) Examine all such representations
received by BDA pursuant to Division
Bench order and BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s judgment placed before
the Committee and submit a report to
the BDA as to whether such claim/s
would fall within the exceptions carved
out under the judgments for deleting the
lands or not. The BDA shall thereafter
take steps to delete or include such
lands from acquisition.

746
(b) The Committee shall also consider the
representations of the land owners
submitted to BDA which shall be placed
before the Committee to ascertain as to
whether the lands of the applicants are
landlocked and/or adjacent lands
having been dropped from acquisition
without dropping the lands of the
applicants. The Committee shall
examine the claim on case to case basis
and on being satisfied either such claim
being genuine or being contrary to
factual scenario shall prepare a report
village wise and forward the same to the
BDA to enable the said authority to
either delete such lands from acquisition
or conclude the acquisition.
(c) The Committee shall either by itself or
through its empowered officers carryout
inspection of all 16 villages where sites
have been carved in Arkavati Layout by
identifying such sites in respect of which

747
allotment letters, possession certificate
has been issued and recommend to the
BDA to handover possession of such
sites to the allottees forthwith for
ensuring the process of allotment is
taken to its logical end by forwarding a
report in that regard to the BDA
expeditiously and preferably within a
period of four (4) months today. On
receipt of such report from the
Committee, BDA shall expeditiously and
not later than one (1) month from the
date of receipt of such report shall
execute the Lease cum Sale Agreement
or absolute Sale Deed, as the case may
be, by confirming possession of such
sites having been handed over or
delivered to the allottees.
(d) The Committee shall examine as to
whether the claim of land owners for
deleting their lands from being acquired
is within the parameters or the

748
directions issued by the Division Bench
and the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case and if so, shall
submit a report to the BDA to the said
effect and pursuant to the same BDA
shall take steps accordingly to either
delete the land or proceed with allotment
of the sites to the applicants that may be
formed in such lands.
(e) The Committee shall examine as to
whether deletion of land/s from
acquisition made by the BDA is within
the parameters fixed by Division Bench
and BONDU RAMASWAMY's case by
examining every such deletion made on
case to case basis and particularly with
reference to deletion made on the
ground of adjacent lands having been
deleted.
(f) The Committee shall also examine the
claim of the applicants on case to case
basis for deletion of lands on the ground

749
of area being built-up by considering or
looking into the scientific evidence that
may be secured by the Committee as
noticed hereinabove.
(g) The Committee shall examine the claim
of the applicants on case to case basis
for deletion of lands from acquisition on
the ground of buildings having been
constructed by ascertaining as to
whether such buildings have come up
prior to the Preliminary Notification
dated 03.02.2003 or thereafter. It is
made clear that such buildings/sheds
constructed with asbestos sheets or tiled
roof, shall not be eligible to be
considered as a pucca building for the
purposes of exclusion from acquisition
even if so claimed by the applicants.
(h) The Committee shall examine as to
whether deletion of 983.12 acres of land
by the Government subsequent to the
Notification dated 23.02.2004 and before

750
issuance of Notification dated
18.06.2014 was in accordance of dicta
laid down by the Division Bench and in
compliance with directions/clarifications
issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case and submit a
report to the BDA, who shall take steps
based on said report.
(i) The Committee shall also examine the
applications of revenue site holders for
allotment of sites in accordance with the
extant Circular of BDA dated
09.06.2017 and Resolution dated
18.04.2017 keeping in mind the law laid
down in JUNJAMMA’s case and also
keeping in mind paragraph 3.2 of the
memo filed before the Division Bench
whereunder BDA has undertaken to
allot a site measuring 30' X 40' in favour
of revenue site holders, whose revenue
sites had been acquired, which would be
in terms of the order/direction issued in

751
W.P.Nos.20875-938/2001 dated
20.07.2021 (Anjanapura Scheme).
(j) The Committee shall examine as to
whether on Layout/s formed by Housing
Co-operative Societies or House Building
Co-operative Societies or registered
Union or registered Association wherein
sites have been formed and allotted to
its Members wherein construction of
buildings have come up by conducting
spot inspection either by itself or
through its empowered officers and if
the Committee is of the view that it is a
self contained Layout, a report to said
effect shall be submitted to BDA, upon
which BDA shall delete the said lands
from acquisition. However, it is made
clear that if BDA has taken possession
of such lands and has already formed
sites, allotment made, then claim of the
Members of the Co-operative Society for
allotment of alternate site would only be

752
considered by the BDA and it is made
clear that said benefit would be available
only to the applicants or Members of the
Society/Union/Association, who have
purchased the property under registered
sale deed from such Housing Co-
operative Society or House Building Co-
operative Society or Registered Union or
Registered Association, as the case may
be.
(k) The BDA shall publish the operative
portion of this order in any two (2)
vernacular newspapers consecutively on
two (2) dates within a gap of 10 days
from today, so as to avoid issuance of
individual notices by the Committee and
it is made clear that there would be no
need or necessity to issue individual
notices by the Committee.
(l) The Committee would at liberty to
examine as to whether BDA has
undertaken any exercise to delete lands

753
suo motu and if it is so found, the
exercise so undertaken by BDA would
stand quashed if it is not in conformity
with the order passed by the Division
Bench as affirmed and clarified by the
Apex Court, to which effect the
Committee shall submit a report to BDA
and on such report being submitted, the
deleted lands would stand restored to
BDA for the purposes of formation of
sites in Arkavati Layout to be allotted to
the applicants in waiting.
(xxi) All lands which are the subject matter of
acquisition for the purpose of Arkavati Layout if
having been converted, layout formed, sites
carved and constructions having been put-up
prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification dated
03.02.2003, would be entitled for deletion from
acquisition, subject to report being submitted by
the Committee to the said effect.
(xxii) All writ petitions which have not been specifically
dealt with hereinabove is deemed to have been

754
disposed of in terms of the above order and all
pending interlocutory applications stands
consigned to records.
(xxiii) No order as to costs.
SD/-
JUDGE
*sp/DR

WP 51929-2014 and Connected Matters - Arkavathy Layout

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

WP 51929-2014 and Connected Matters - Arkavathy Layout

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

54358/2014, 54725/2014, 55081/2014, 55082/2014,

34348/2016, 35687/2016, 35851/2016, 36525/2016,

43207/2017, 45953/2017, 46333/2017, 46766/2017,

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

AICOBOONAGAR, BTM I STAGE,

16. SMT DEEPTI M SHAH

18. S.V. SUNDARARAJAN

3RD BLOCK, BEL LAYOUT,

21. B.R. MURALIDHAR

23. RAMESHA M.R.

25. SMT. RATHI POONACHA

2ND CROSS, 10TH MAIN,

26. C.S. NARAYANASWAMY

1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

(SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

ALL ARE RESIDING AT

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION

(BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

BOTH R/A NO.80,

(BY SRI. G.R. VENKATESH MURTHY, ADVOCATE

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE,

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO

(BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE)

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

(ARABIC COLLEGE POST,

(BY SRI. V.S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE

(BY SRI. SADASHIVAIAH K.G., ADVOCATE)

3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION

THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

IN W.P. NO.12014 /2014:

1ST CROSS, VENKATESHAPURA