Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The purpose of this document is to provide written record for the Employees by their Line Managers on their performance. Line Managers/evaluators are urged to be frank in their
evaluation both for the benefit of the staff member and for the accuracy
Employee Name: Rizwan Elahi Designation: Sr. Officer IR Date of Joining: 21-Feb-11
Line Manager's Name: Abid Yaqoob Bajwa Line Manager's Designation: Deputy Manager IR & Admin Unit Gloves Unit Faisalabad
This is a discussion between two individuals. It is about : Please set SMART Objectives i.e.
Giving and receiving feedback SPECIFIC but Stretching - this lead to higher performance than vague general goal
*
Joint problem solving MEASUREABLE - there should be the ability to quantitatively measure the outcome
*
Offering guidance and support ALIGNED & ACHIEVEABLE- agreed between employee and Line Manager and aligned with Company objectives
*
Discussing and exchanging views and ideas REALISTIC - can they be completed given time, resources and workload
*
It’s a Confidential discussion TIME BOUND - there needs to be a clear date for completion
*
Its not an “ INTERVIEW “
*
SECTION 1a: OBJECTIVE SETTINGS
Instructions
The sum of Weightage of Objectives needs to be equal to 100
The sum of Weightage of KPIs for each objective needs to be equal to 100
TOTAL
(Should be =100) 100%
The purpose of this document is to provide written record for the Employees by their Line Managers on their performance. Line Managers/evaluators are urged to be frank in their
evaluation both for the benefit of the staff member and for the accuracy
Rating Standards:
Outstanding 115% and above, Exceeding 101% to 115%, Fully Meeting 86% to 100%, Meeting Most 61% - 85%, Meeting Partially 50% - 60%, Unsatisfactory under 50%
WEIGHTAGE KPI
KEY PERFORMANCE MID YEAR END YEAR OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVES WEIGHTAGE (out of 100 per Achievement TOTAL KPI %
INDICATOR (KPI) objective) REVIEW REVIEW % Achievement %
S.# %
WEIGHTATED RATING
*WEIGHTAGE (a) OBJECTIVE GRAND TOTAL (b) (X)
(a %) x (b %) = (X)
The purpose of this document is to provide written record for the Employees by their Line Managers on their performance. Line Managers/evaluators are urged to be frank in their
evaluation both for the benefit of the staff member and for the accuracy
ACHIEVED % (out of
COMPETENCY
WEIGHTAGE % 100% see rating
DEMONSTRATED EXAMPLE (Please consider were Achievement
S.# MIDAS Safety CORPORATE PRINCIPLES standard)
the action SUSTAINABLE)
(A) (B) (A %) x (B %)
TOTAL
(Should be =100) 100% GRAND TOTAL 0%
WEIGHTATED RATING
*WEIGHTAGE (a) PRINCIPLES GRAND TOTAL (b) (Y)
(a %) x (b %) = (Y)
* For 2014, the achievement will be calculated based on Goals/Objectives
only 30% 0% 0%
Latent potential
1) Employee is well aligned with current role, but has not demonstrated potential beyond what is expected in the current role.
2) Employee is not well aligned with the current role and there is uncertainty what other role he/she could take.
3) Employee possesses critical competence, engagement, but has no/low desire for advancement. Late
1
4) No, or little alignment between employee’s personal values and Corporate Principles and no or low commitment* toward the Company. nt
Solid potential
1) Employee is aligned with current role, but believed to be ready for more complex tasks or to broaden expertise if development provided &
2
2) Employee demonstrates desire for advancement.& Soli
3) Employee’s personal values are aligned with Corporate Principles and employee demonstrates commitment* toward the Company.
d
High potential
1) Employee has the professional and personal skills (both innate and acquired) to handle increasingly complex challenges in a more enlarged, critical
position. AND
2) Employee has strong desire for advancement, aligned with company aspirations. Has good learning agility, is able to monitor capacity, handles job stress
3 and geographically mobile. AND Hig
3) Employee’s personal values are aligned with Corporate Principles and employee demonstrates commitment* toward the Company.
h
COMMENTS:
Yes
No
RECOMMEND FOR PROMOTION No
The purpose of this document is to provide written record for the Employees by their Line Managers on their performance. Line Managers/evaluators are urged to be frank in their
evaluation both for the benefit of the staff member and for the accuracy
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
To be filled at Year End
FINAL EVALUATION
GOALS/OBJECTIVES + MIDAS CORPRATE PRINCIPLES = 100%
70% 30%
56% 0% 56.3% No
Rating Standards:
Outstanding 115% and above, Exceeding 101% to 115%, Fully Meeting 86% to 100%, Meeting Most 61% - 85%, Meeting Partially 50% - 60%, Unsatisfactory under 50%
*ACHIEVEMENT
Submitted to HR HR Signature