Accessed from 128.83.63.
20 by nEwp0rt1 on Sat Dec 03 01:21:46 EST 2011
USP 35
a slope of 1, passing through the origin; the points corre-
sponding to saturated solutions fall on another straight line
(BC), the slope, S, of which represents the weight fraction
of impurity or impurities present in the test substance. Fail-
ure of points to fall on a straight line indicates that equilib-
rium has not been achieved. A curve indicates that the ma-
terial under test may be a solid solution. Calculate the
percentage purity of the test substance by the formula:
100 – 100S.
The slope, S, may be calculated graphically or by least-
squares treatment for best fit of the experimental values to a
straight line.
Typical Phase-Solubility Diagram
The solubility of the main component is obtained by ex-
tending the solubility line (BC) through the y-axis. The point
of interception on the y-axis is the extrapolated solubility, in
mg per g, and is a constant for a given compound.
Purification Technique
Since the solvent phase in all combinations of solvent and
solute that are used to construct segment BC of a phase-
solubility diagram contains essentially all the impurities origi-
nally present in the substance under analysis, whereas the
solid phase is essentially free from impurities, phase-solubil-
ity analysis can be used to prepare pure reference specimens
of desired compounds as well as concentrates of impurities
from substances otherwise considered pure. A simple modi-
fication of this technique can be used to accomplish these
purposes with considerably less effort than is usually re-
quired for rigorous phase-solubility analysis.
In practice, a weighed amount of test specimen is sus-
pended in a nonreactive solvent of suitable composition and
amount so that about 10% of the material is dissolved at
equilibrium. The suspension is sealed (a screw-cap vial is
usually adequate) and shaken at room temperature until
equilibrium is attained (usually 24 hours is sufficient for this
purpose). The mother liquor is then drawn off and evapo-
rated at or near room temperature to dryness. Since the
mother liquor contained essentially all the impurities that
were present in the specimen, the residue has been concen-
trated with respect to the impurities roughly in proportion
to the ratio of the weight of specimen taken to the weight
of solids dissolved in the volume of solvent used.
Official from May 1, 2012
Copyright (c) 2011 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.
General Information / 〈1174〉 Powder Flow 801
The undissolved crystals remaining after withdrawal of the
mother liquor are usually sufficiently pure to be used as a
reference standard after appropriate rinsing and drying.
〈1174〉 POWDER FLOW
The widespread use of powders in the pharmaceutical in-
dustry has generated a variety of methods for characterizing
powder flow. Not surprisingly, scores of references appear in
the pharmaceutical literature, attempting to correlate the
various measures of powder flow to manufacturing proper-
ties. The development of such a variety of test methods was
inevitable; powder behavior is multifaceted and thus compli-
cates the effort to characterize powder flow. The purpose of
this chapter is to review the methods for characterizing
powder flow that have appeared most frequently in the
pharmaceutical literature. In addition, while it is clear that
no single and simple test method can adequately character-
ize the flow properties of pharmaceutical powders, this
chapter proposes the standardization of test methods that
may be valuable during pharmaceutical development.
Four commonly reported methods for testing powder
flow are (1) angle of repose, (2) compressibility index or
Hausner ratio, (3) flow rate through an orifice, and (4) shear
cell. In addition, numerous variations of each of these basic
methods are available. Given the number of test methods
and variations, standardizing the test methodology, where
possible, would be advantageous.
With this goal in mind, the most frequently used methods
are discussed below. Important experimental considerations
are identified and recommendations are made regarding
standardization of the methods. In general, any method of
measuring powder flow should be practical, useful, repro-
ducible, sensitive, and yield meaningful results. It bears re-
peating that no one simple powder flow method will ade-
quately or completely characterize the wide range of flow
properties experienced in the pharmaceutical industry. An
appropriate strategy may well be the use of multiple stan-
dardized test methods to characterize the various aspects of
powder flow as needed by the pharmaceutical scientist.
ANGLE OF REPOSE
The angle of repose has been used in several branches of
science to characterize the flow properties of solids. Angle of
repose is a characteristic related to interparticulate friction or
resistance to movement between particles. Angle of repose
test results are reported to be very dependent upon the
method used. Experimental difficulties arise as a result of
segregation of material and consolidation or aeration of the
powder as the cone is formed. Despite its difficulties, the
method continues to be used in the pharmaceutical indus-
try, and a number of examples demonstrating its value in
predicting manufacturing problems appear in the literature.
The angle of repose is the constant, three-dimensional an-
gle (relative to the horizontal base) assumed by a cone-like
pile of material formed by any of several different methods
(described briefly below).
Basic Methods for Angle of Repose
A variety of angle of repose test methods are described in
the literature. The most common methods for determining
the static angle of repose can be classified on the basis of
the following two important experimental variables:
 Accessed from 128.83.63.20 by nEwp0rt1 on Sat Dec 03 01:21:46 EST 2011
802 〈1174〉 Powder Flow / General Information
(1) The height of the “funnel” through which the powder
passes may be fixed relative to the base, or the height
may be varied as the pile forms.
(2) The base upon which the pile forms may be of fixed
diameter or the diameter of the powder cone may be
allowed to vary as the pile forms.
Variations in Angle of Repose Methods
In addition to the above methods, the following variations
have been used to some extent in the pharmaceutical
literature:
• Drained angle of repose is determined by allowing an
excess quantity of material positioned above a fixed di-
ameter base to “drain” from the container. Formation
of a cone of powder on the fixed diameter base allows
determination of the drained angle of repose.
• Dynamic angle of repose is determined by filling a cylin-
der (with a clear, flat cover on one end) and rotating it
at a specified speed. The dynamic angle of repose is the
angle (relative to the horizontal) formed by the flowing
powder. The internal angle of kinetic friction is defined
by the plane separating those particles sliding down the
top layer of the powder and those particles that are
rotating with the drum (with roughened surface).
Angle of Repose General Scale of Flowability
Although there is some variation in the qualitative descrip-
tion of powder flow using the angle of repose, much of the
pharmaceutical literature appears to be consistent with the
classification by Carr*, which is shown in Table 1. There are
examples in the literature of formulations with an angle of
repose in the range of 40° to 50° that were manufactured
satisfactorily. When the angle of repose exceeds 50°, the
flow is rarely acceptable for manufacturing purposes.
Table 1. Flow Properties and Corresponding
Angles of Repose*
Flow Property Angle of Repose (degrees)
Excellent 25–30
Good 31–35
Fair—aid not needed 36–40
Passable—may hang up 41–45
Poor—must agitate, vibrate 46–55
Very poor 56–65
Very, very poor >66
Experimental Considerations for Angle of
Repose
Angle of repose is not an intrinsic property of the powder;
i.e., it is very much dependent upon the method used to
form the cone of powder. The following important consider-
ations are raised in the existing literature:
• The peak of the cone of powder can be distorted by
the impact of powder from above. By carefully building
the powder cone, the distortion caused by impact can
be minimized.
• The nature of the base upon which the powder cone is
formed influences the angle of repose. It is recom-
mended that the powder cone be formed on a “com-
mon base,” which can be achieved by forming the
cone of powder on a layer of powder. This can be done
by using a base of fixed diameter with a protruding
outer edge to retain a layer of powder upon which the
cone is formed.
*Carr, R.L. Evaluating Flow Properties of Solids. Chem. Eng. 1965, 72,
163–168.
Official from May 1, 2012
Copyright (c) 2011 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.
USP 35
Recommended Procedure for Angle of Repose
Form the angle of repose on a fixed base with a retaining
lip to retain a layer of powder on the base. The base should
be free of vibration. Vary the height of the funnel to care-
fully build up a symmetrical cone of powder. Care should
be taken to prevent vibration as the funnel is moved. The
funnel height should be maintained approximately 2–4 cm
from the top of the powder pile as it is being formed in
order to minimize the impact of falling powder on the tip of
the cone. If a symmetrical cone of powder cannot be suc-
cessfully or reproducibly prepared, this method is not appro-
priate. Determine the angle of repose by measuring the
height of the cone of powder and calculating the angle of
repose, α, from the following equation:
tan (α) = height/0.5 base
COMPRESSIBILITY INDEX AND HAUSNER
RATIO
In recent years the compressibility index and the closely
related Hausner ratio have become the simple, fast, and
popular methods of predicting powder flow characteristics.
The compressibility index has been proposed as an indirect
measure of bulk density, size and shape, surface area, mois-
ture content, and cohesiveness of materials because all of
these can influence the observed compressibility index. The
compressibility index and the Hausner ratio are determined
by measuring both the bulk volume and the tapped volume
of a powder.
Basic Methods for Compressibility Index and
Hausner Ratio
Although there are some variations in the method of de-
termining the compressibility index and Hausner ratio, the
basic procedure is to measure (1) the unsettled apparent
volume, VO, and (2) the final tapped volume, Vf, of the
powder after tapping the material until no further volume
changes occur. The compressibility index and the Hausner
ratio are calculated as follows:
Compressibility Index = 100 × [(VO − Vf)/VO]
Hausner Ratio = (VO/Vf)
Alternatively, the compressibility index and Hausner ratio
may be calculated using measured values for bulk density
(ρbulk) and tapped density (ρtapped) as follows:
Compressibility Index = 100 × [(ρtapped − ρbulk)/ρtapped]
Hausner Ratio = (ρtapped/ρbulk)
In a variation of these methods, the rate of consolidation is
sometimes measured rather than, or in addition to, the
change in volume that occurs on tapping. For the com-
pressibility index and the Hausner ratio, the generally ac-
cepted scale of flowability is given in Table 2*.
Table 2. Scale of Flowability*
Compressibility
Index (%) Flow Character Hausner Ratio
≤10 Excellent 1.00–1.11
11–15 Good 1.12–1.18
16–20 Fair 1.19–1.25
21–25 Passable 1.26–1.34
Accessed from 128.83.63.20 by nEwp0rt1 on Sat Dec 03 01:21:46 EST 2011
USP 35
Table 2. Scale of Flowability* (Continued)
Compressibility
Index (%) Flow Character Hausner Ratio
26–31 Poor 1.35–1.45
32–37 Very poor 1.46–1.59
>38 Very, very poor >1.60
Experimental Considerations for the
Compressibility Index and Hausner Ratio
Compressibility index and Hausner ratio are not intrinsic
properties of the powder; i.e., they depend on the method-
ology used. In the existing literature, there are discussions of
the following important considerations affecting the deter-
mination of (1) the unsettled apparent volume, Vo, (2) the
final tapped volume, Vf, (3) the bulk density, ρbulk, and (4)
the tapped density, ρtapped:
• The diameter of the cylinder used
• The number of times the powder is tapped to achieve
the tapped density
• The mass of material used in the test
• Rotation of the sample during tapping
Recommended Procedure for Compressibility
Index and Hausner Ratio
Use a 250-mL volumetric cylinder with a test sample
weight of 100 g. Smaller weights and volumes may be used,
but variations in the method should be described with the
results. An average of three determinations is
recommended.
FLOW THROUGH AN ORIFICE
The flow rate of a material depends upon many factors,
some of which are particle-related and some related to the
process. Monitoring the rate of flow of material through an
orifice has been proposed as a better measure of powder
flowability. Of particular significance is the utility of monitor-
ing flow continuously because pulsating flow patterns have
been observed even for free flowing materials. Changes in
flow rate as the container empties can also be observed.
Empirical equations relating flow rate to the diameter of the
opening, particle size, and particle density have been deter-
mined. However, determining the flow rate through an ori-
fice is useful only with free-flowing materials.
The flow rate through an orifice is generally measured as
the mass per time flowing from any of a number of types of
containers (cylinders, funnels, hoppers). Measurement of the
flow rate can be in discrete increments or continuous.
Basic Methods for Flow Through an Orifice
There are a variety of methods described in the literature.
The most common method for determining the flow rate
through an orifice can be classified on the basis of three
important experimental variables:
(1) The type of container used to contain the powder.
Common containers are cylinders, funnels, and hop-
pers from production equipment.
(2) The size and shape of the orifice used. The orifice di-
ameter and shape are critical factors in determining
powder flow rate.
(3) The method of measuring powder flow rate. Flow rate
can be measured continuously using an electronic bal-
ance with some sort of recording device (strip chart
recorder, computer). It can also be measured in dis-
crete samples (for example, the time it takes for 100 g
of powder to pass through the orifice to the nearest
Official from May 1, 2012
Copyright (c) 2011 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.
General Information / 〈1174〉 Powder Flow 803
tenth of a second or the amount of powder passing
through the orifice in 10 seconds to the nearest tenth
of a gram).
Variations in Methods for Flow Through an
Orifice
Either mass flow rate or volume flow rate can be deter-
mined. Mass flow rate is the easier of the methods, but it
biases the results in favor of high-density materials. Because
die fill is volumetric, determining volume flow rate may be
preferable. A vibrator is occasionally attached to facilitate
flow from the container; however, this appears to compli-
cate interpretation of the results. A moving orifice device
has been proposed to more closely simulate rotary press
conditions. The minimum diameter orifice through which
powder flows can also be identified.
General Scale of Flowability for Flow Through
an Orifice
No general scale is available because flow rate is critically
dependent on the method used to measure it. Comparison
between published results is difficult.
Experimental Considerations for Flow Through
an Orifice
Flow rate through an orifice is not an intrinsic property of
the powder. It very much depends on the methodology
used. Several important considerations affecting these meth-
ods are discussed in the existing literature:
• The diameter and shape of the orifice
• The type of container material (metal, glass, plastic)
• The diameter and height of the powder bed.
Recommended Procedure for Flow Through
an Orifice
Flow rate through an orifice can be used only for materi-
als that have some capacity to flow. It is not useful for cohe-
sive materials. Provided that the height of the powder bed
(the “head” of the powder) is much greater than the diam-
eter of the orifice, the flow rate is virtually independent of
the powder head. Use a cylinder as the container because
the cylinder material should have little effect on flow. This
configuration results in flow rate being determined by the
movement of powder over powder rather than powder
along the wall of the container. Powder flow rate often in-
creases when the height of the powder column is less than
two times the diameter of the column. The orifice should be
circular and the cylinder should be free of vibration. General
guidelines for dimensions of the cylinder are as follows:
• Diameter of opening > 6 times the diameter of the
particles
• Diameter of the cylinder > 2 times the diameter of the
opening
Use of a hopper as the container may be appropriate and
representative of flow in a production situation. It is not
advisable to use a funnel, particularly one with a stem, be-
cause flow rate will be determined by the size and length of
the stem as well as the friction between the stem and the
powder. A truncated cone may be appropriate, but flow will
be influenced by the powder-wall friction coefficient, mak-
ing selection of an appropriate construction material an im-
portant consideration.
For the opening in the cylinder, use a flat-faced bottom
plate with the option to vary orifice diameter to provide
maximum flexibility and to better ensure a powder-over-
powder flow pattern. Rate measurement can be either dis-
crete or continuous. Continuous measurement using an
 Accessed from 128.83.63.20 by nEwp0rt1 on Sat Dec 03 01:21:46 EST 2011
804 〈1174〉 Powder Flow / General Information
electronic balance can more effectively detect momentary
flow rate variations.
SHEAR CELL METHODS
In an effort to put powder flow studies and hopper de-
sign on a more fundamental basis, a variety of powder shear
testers and methods that permit more thorough and pre-
cisely defined assessment of powder flow properties have
been developed. Shear cell methodology has been used ex-
tensively in the study of pharmaceutical materials. From
these methods, a wide variety of parameters can be ob-
tained, including the yield loci representing the shear stress-
shear strain relationship, the angle of internal friction, the
unconfined yield strength, the tensile strength, and a variety
of derived parameters such as the flow factor and other
flowability indices. Because of the ability to more precisely
control experimental parameters, flow properties can also be
determined as a function of consolidation load, time, and
other environmental conditions. The methods have been
successfully used to determine critical hopper and bin
parameters.
Basic Methods for Shear Cell
One type of shear cell is the cylindrical shear cell that is
split horizontally, forming a shear plane between the lower
stationary base and the upper moveable portion of the
shear cell ring. After powder bed consolidation in the shear
cell (using a well-defined procedure), the force necessary to
shear the powder bed by moving the upper ring is deter-
mined. Annular shear cell designs offer some advantages
over the cylindrical shear cell design, including the need for
less material. A disadvantage, however, is that because of its
design, the powder bed is not sheared as uniformly; i.e.,
material on the outside of the annulus is sheared more than
material in the inner region. A third type of shear cell (plate-
type) consists of a thin sandwich of powder between a
lower stationary rough surface and an upper rough surface
that is moveable.
All of the shear cell methods have their advantages and
disadvantages, but a detailed review is beyond the scope of
this chapter. As with the other methods for characterizing
powder flow, many variations are described in the literature.
A significant advantage of shear cell methodology in general
is a greater degree of experimental control. The methodol-
ogy is rather time-consuming and requires significant
amounts of material and a well-trained operator.
Recommendations for Shear Cell
The many existing shear cell configurations and test
methods provide a wealth of data and can be used very
effectively to characterize powder flow. They are also helpful
in the design of equipment such as hoppers and bins. Be-
cause of the diversity of available equipment and experi-
mental procedures, no specific recommendations regarding
methodology are presented in this chapter. It is recom-
mended that the results of powder flow characterization us-
ing shear cell methodology include a complete description
of equipment and methodology used.
Official from May 1, 2012
Copyright (c) 2011 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.
USP 35
〈1176〉 PRESCRIPTION
BALANCES AND VOLUMETRIC
APPARATUS
Prescription Balances
NOTE—Balances other than the type described herein
may be used if these afford equivalent or better accuracy.
This includes micro-, semimicro-, or electronic single-pan
balances (see Weights and Balances 〈41〉). Some balances of-
fer digital or direct-reading features. All balances should be
calibrated and tested frequently using appropriate test
weights, both singly and in combination.
Description—A prescription balance is a scale or balance
adapted to weighing medicinal and other substances re-
quired in prescriptions or in other pharmaceutical com-
pounding. It is constructed so as to support its full capacity
without developing undue stresses, and its adjustment is not
altered by repeated weighings of the capacity load. The re-
movable pans or weighing vessels should be of equal
weight. The balance should have leveling feet or screws.
The balance may feature dial-in weights and also a precision
spring and dial instead of a weighbeam. A balance that has
a graduated weighbeam must have a stop that halts the
rider or poise at the zero reading. The reading edge of the
rider is parallel to the graduations on the weighbeam. The
distance from the face of the index plate to the indicator
pointer or pointers should be not more than 1.0 mm, the
points should be sharp, and when there are two, their ends
should be separated by not more than 1.0 mm when the
scale is in balance. The indicating elements and the lever
system should be protected against drafts, and the balance
lid should permit free movement of the loaded weighing
pans when the lid is closed. The balance must have a me-
chanical arresting device.
Definitions—
Capacity—Maximum weight, including the weight of
tares, to be placed on one pan. The N.B.S. Handbook 44,
4th ed., states: “In the absence of information to the contrary,
the nominal capacity of a Class A balance shall be assumed
to be 15.5 g (1/2 apothecaries’ ounce).” Most of the com-
mercially available Class A balances have a capacity of 120 g
and bear a statement to that effect.
Weighbeam or Beam—A graduated bar equipped with a
movable poise or rider. Metric graduations are in 0.01-g
increments up to a maximum of 1.0 g.
Tare Bar—An auxiliary ungraduated weighbeam bar with
a movable poise. It can be used to correct for variations in
weighing glasses or papers.
Balance Indicator—A combination of elements, one or
both of which will oscillate with respect to the other, to
indicate the equilibrium state of the balance during
weighing.
Rest Point—The point on the index plate at which the
indicator or pointer stops when the oscillations of the bal-
ance cease; or the index plate position of the indicator or
pointer calculated from recorded consecutive oscillations in
both directions past the zero of the index plate scale. If the
balance has a two-pointer indicating mechanism, the posi-
tion or the oscillations of only one of the pointers need be
recorded or used to determine the rest point.
Sensitivity Requirements (SR)—The maximum change in
load that will cause a specified change, one subdivision on
the index plate, in the position of rest of the indicating ele-
ment or elements of the balance.
Stage 6 Harmonization
Official December 1, 2012 〈616〉 Bulk Density and Tapped Density of Powders 1

expression of results. For test samples having an apparent

〈616〉 BULK DENSITY AND volume between 50 mL and 100 mL, a 100-mL cylinder
readable to 1 mL can be used; the volume of the cylinder
TAPPED DENSITY OF POWDERS is specified in the expression of results.

Method II—Measurement in a Volumeter

Change to read: Apparatus—The apparatus (Figure 1) consists of a top
funnel fitted with a 1.0-mm ■sieve■2S (USP35).1 The funnel is
mounted over a baffle box containing four glass baffle
plates over which the powder slides and bounces as it
BULK DENSITY passes. At the bottom of the baffle box is a funnel that
collects the powder and allows it to pour into a cup of
This general chapter has been harmonized with the cor- specified capacity mounted directly below it. The cup may
responding texts of the European Pharmacopoeia and/or the be cylindrical (25.00 ± 0.05 mL volume with an inside di-
Japanese Pharmacopoeia. ✦The portion that is not harmo- ameter of 30.00 ± 2.00 mm) or ■cubical■2S (USP35) (16.39 ±
nized is marked with symbols (✦✦) to specify this fact.✦ 0.2 mL volume with inside dimensions of ■25.400■2S (USP35) ±
The bulk density of a powder is the ratio of the mass of 0.076 mm).
an untapped powder sample and its volume including the
contribution of the interparticulate void volume. Hence, the
bulk density depends on both the density of powder parti-
cles and the spatial arrangement of particles in the powder
bed. The bulk density is expressed in grams per mL (g/mL)
although the international unit is kilograms per cubic meter
(1 g/mL = 1000 kg/m3) because the measurements are
made using cylinders. It may also be expressed in grams
per cubic centimeter (g/cm3). The bulking properties of a
powder are dependent upon the preparation, treatment,
and storage of the sample, i.e., how it was handled. The
particles can be packed to have a range of bulk densities;
however, the slightest disturbance of the powder bed may
result in a changed bulk density. Thus, the bulk density of a
powder is often very difficult to measure with good repro-
ducibility and, in reporting the results, it is essential to
specify how the determination was made. The bulk density
of a powder is determined by measuring the volume of a
known weight of powder sample, that may have been
passed through a ■sieve■2S (USP35), into a graduated cylinder
(Method I), or by measuring the mass of a known volume Figure 1.
of powder that has been passed through a volumeter into
a cup (Method II) or a measuring vessel (Method III).
Method I and Method III are favored. Procedure—Allow an excess of powder to flow through
the apparatus into the sample receiving cup until it over-
flows, using a minimum of 25 cm3 of powder with the
Method I—Measurement in a Graduated square cup and 35 cm3 of powder with the cylindrical cup.
Cylinder Carefully scrape excess powder from the top of the cup by
smoothly moving the edge of the blade of a spatula per-
pendicular to and in contact with the top surface of the
Procedure—Pass a quantity of material sufficient to cup, taking care to keep the spatula perpendicular to pre-
complete the test through a sieve with apertures greater vent packing or removal of powder from the cup. Remove
than or equal to 1.0 mm, if necessary, to break up agglom- any material from the sides of the cup, and determine the
erates that may have formed during storage; this must be weight, M, of the powder to the nearest 0.1%. Calculate
done gently to avoid changing the nature of the material. the bulk density, in g/mL, by the formula:
Into a dry graduated 250-mL cylinder (readable to 2 mL)
introduce, without compacting, approximately 100 g of (M)/(V0)
test sample, M, weighed with 0.1% accuracy. Carefully
level the powder without compacting, if necessary, and in which V0 is the volume, in mL, of the cup. Record the
read the unsettled apparent volume (V0) to the nearest average of three determinations using three different pow-
graduated unit. Calculate the bulk density in g/mL by the der samples.
formula m/V0. Generally, replicate determinations are desir-
able for the determination of this property. If the powder
density is too low or too high, such that the test sample Method III—Measurement in a Vessel
has an untapped apparent volume of either more than 250
mL or less than 150 mL, it is not possible to use 100 g of Apparatus—The apparatus consists of a 100-mL cylindri-
powder sample. Therefore, a different amount of powder cal vessel of stainless steel with dimensions as specified in
has to be selected as the test sample, such that its untap- Figure 2.
ped apparent volume is 150–250 mL (apparent volume
greater than or equal to 60% of the total volume of the 1The apparatus (the Scott Volumeter) conforms to the dimensions in ASTM
329 90.
cylinder); the weight of the test sample is specified in the

2011 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention All Rights Reserved.

Date: 12-OCT-2011 Time: 14:48 (P) \\usp-netapp2\share\SHARE\USPNF\PRINTQ\pager\xmlIn\AO_20111012144615_m99375.XML

2 〈616〉 Bulk Density and Tapped Density of Powders
Figure 3.
Figure 2.
Procedure—Pass a quantity of powder sufficient to com-
plete the test through a 1.0-mm sieve, if necessary, to
break up agglomerates that may have formed during stor-
age, and allow the obtained sample to flow freely into the
measuring vessel until it overflows. Carefully scrape the ex-
cess powder from the top of the vessel as described for
Method II. Determine the weight (M0) of the powder to the
nearest 0.1% by subtraction of the previously determined
mass of the empty measuring vessel. Calculate the bulk
density (g/mL) by the formula M0/100, and record the av-
erage of three determinations using three different powder
samples.
Change to read:
TAPPED DENSITY
The tapped density is an increased bulk density attained
after mechanically tapping a container containing the pow-
der sample. Tapped density is obtained by mechanically
tapping a graduated measuring cylinder or vessel contain-
ing a powder sample. After observing the initial powder
2011 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention All Rights Reserved.
Date: 12-OCT-2011 Time: 14:48 (P) \\usp-netapp2\share\SHARE\USPNF\PRINTQ\pager\xmlIn\AO_20111012144615_m99375.XML
Stage 6 Harmonization
Official December 1, 2012
volume or weight, the measuring cylinder or vessel is
mechanically tapped, and volume or weight readings are
taken until little further volume or weight change is ob-
served. The mechanical tapping is achieved by raising the
cylinder or vessel and allowing it to drop under its own
weight a specified distance by either of three methods as
described below. Devices that rotate the cylinder or vessel
during tapping may be preferred to minimize any possible
separation of the mass during tapping down.
Method I
Apparatus—The apparatus (Figure 3) consists of the
following:
• A 250-mL graduated cylinder (readable to 2 mL with a
mass of 220 ± 44 g)
• A settling apparatus capable of producing, in 1 min,
either nominally 250 ± 15 taps from a height of 3 ± 0.2
mm, or nominally 300 ± 15 taps from a height of
14 ± 2 mm. The support for the graduated cylinder,
with its holder, has a mass of 450 ± 10 g.
Procedure—Proceed as described above for the determi-
nation of the bulk volume (V0). Secure the cylinder in the
holder. Carry out 10, 500, and 1250 taps on the same
powder sample and read the corresponding volumes V10,
V500, and V1250 to the nearest graduated unit. If the differ-
ence between V500 and V1250 is less than ■or equal
to■2S (USP35) 2 mL, V1250 is the tapped volume. If the differ-
ence between V500 and V1250 exceeds 2 mL, repeat in incre-
ments such as 1250 taps, until the difference between suc-
ceeding measurements is less than ■or equal to■2S (USP35) 2
mL. Fewer taps may be appropriate for some powders,
when validated. Calculate the tapped density (g/mL) using
the formula m/VF, in which VF is the final tapped volume.
Stage 6 Harmonization
Official December 1, 2012
Generally, replicate determinations are desirable for the de-
termination of this property. Specify the drop height with
the results. If it is not possible to use a 100-g test sample,
use a reduced amount and a suitable 100-mL graduated
cylinder (readable to 1 mL) weighing 130 ± 16 g and
mounted on a holder weighing 240 ± 12 g. The modified
test conditions are specified in the expression of the results.
Method II
Apparatus and Procedure—Proceed as directed under
Method I except that the mechanical tester provides a fixed
drop of 3 ± 0.2 mm at a nominal rate of 250 taps per min.
Method III
Apparatus and Procedure—Proceed as directed in
Method III—Measurement in a Vessel for measuring bulk
density using the measuring vessel equipped with the cap
shown in Figure 2. The measuring vessel with the cap is
lifted 50–60 times per min by the use of a suitable tapped
density tester. Carry out 200 taps, remove the cap, and
carefully scrape excess powder from the top of the measur-
ing vessel as described in Method III—Measurement in a Ves-
sel for measuring the bulk density. Repeat the procedure
using 400 taps. If the difference between the two masses
obtained after 200 and 400 taps exceeds 2%, carry out a
test using 200 additional taps until the difference between
succeeding measurements is less than 2%. Calculate the
tapped density (g/mL) using the formula MF/100, where MF
is the mass of powder in the measuring vessel. Record the
average of three determinations using three different pow-
der samples. ■The test conditions including tapping height
are specified in the expression of the results.■1S (USP34)
Change to read:
MEASURES OF POWDER COMPRESSIBILITY
Because the interparticulate interactions influencing the
bulking properties of a powder are also the interactions
2011 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention All Rights Reserved.
Date: 12-OCT-2011 Time: 14:48 (P) \\usp-netapp2\share\SHARE\USPNF\PRINTQ\pager\xmlIn\AO_20111012144615_m99375.XML
〈616〉 Bulk Density and Tapped Density of Powders 3
that interfere with powder flow, a comparison of the bulk
and tapped densities can give a measure of the relative
importance of these interactions in a given powder. Such a
comparison is often used as an index of the ability of the
powder to flow, for example the Compressibility Index or
the Hausner Ratio as described below.
The Compressibility Index and Hausner Ratio are measures
of the propensity of a powder to be compressed as de-
scribed above. As such, they are measures of the powder’s
ability to settle, and they permit an assessment of the rela-
tive importance of interparticulate interactions. In a free-
flowing powder, such interactions are less significant, and
the bulk and tapped densities will be closer in value. For
poorer flowing materials, there are frequently greater in-
terparticle interactions, and a greater difference between
the bulk and tapped densities will be observed. These dif-
ferences are reflected in the Compressibility Index and the
Hausner Ratio.
Compressibility Index—Calculate by the formula:
100(V0 − VF)/V0
V0 = unsettled apparent volume
VF = final tapped volume
Hausner Ratio—
V0/VF
Depending on the material, the compressibility index can
be determined using V10 instead of V0. ■■1S (USP34) [NOTE—If
V10 is used, it will be clearly stated in the results.] ■■1S (USP34)