You are on page 1of 2

J Oncol Pharm Practice (2007) Supplement to 13: 1–81

Preface
In 2003, the president of the International Society of  National Board of Occupational Safety and
Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) approved Health (USA)
a recommendation of the secretariat to establish  Occupational Safety and Health Administration
a new Standards Committee. It was envisaged that (UK)
this committee would be composed of ISOPP  Brazilian Society of Oncology Pharmacy (BRA)
members from a number of different regions of the  Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia
world. With this in mind, and considering the (AUS)
importance of the work of this committee, three co-  UK Pharmaceutical Isolator Group (UK)
chairs were appointed from different ISOPP regions:  Worksafe – Victoria Workcover Authority (AUS)
 Guidelines of University Hospital Gent (BEL)
 Thomas Connor (USA)
 Robert McLauchlan (Australia) At the ISOPP IX Symposium in Torino, Italy in 2004,
 Johan Vandenbroucke (Belgium) the committee co-chairs presented the results of the
analysis of the database to the ISOPP secretariat and it
The first task for the co-chairs was to establish was decided that work could proceed into the next
a working committee of motivated and enthusiastic phase of writing an ISOPP Standard for the Safe
ISOPP members from around the globe. In March Handling of Cytotoxic Drugs. From previous experi-
2003, an individual invitation letter was sent to every ence with the database, it was decided that the ISOPP
ISOPP member seeking expressions of interest website would be used for communication between
in joining the committee. Anyone who had committee members, and to this end the Standard of
previously expressed an interest in the workings Practice Discussion Forum was set up by the ISOPP
of the committee was also approached. This recruit- publications committee.
ment resulted in a core team of hardworking All committee members were invited to participate
committee members without whom this Standard in the writing process or to become part of a
would not be possible. reviewing panel. To ensure coverage of all items
The co-chairs decided that existing regulations, examined in the database, writers with different areas
guidelines, standards or recommendations from of expertise were chosen for different chapters of the
around the world should be examined prior to Standard.
starting work on an ISOPP Safe Handling Standard. Ten ISOPP members were actively involved in the
In order to keep track of all these documents and to writing of the Standard:
be able to analyse these guidelines in a consistent and
logical way, a structured database was established.  Asunción Albert-Mari, Spain
This is a web-based tool to allow committee members  Thomas Connor, USA
from around the world to enter data and access  Sylvie Crauste-Manciet, France
information over the internet. The database was  Harbans Dhillon, Malaysia
divided into 29 different sections, covering all pos-  Dianne Kapty, Canada
sible items related to the safe handling of chemo-  Robert McLauchlan, Australia
therapy including good manufacturing practice  Ioanna Saratsiotou, Greece
(GMP) for sterile cytotoxic products, clinical oncol-  Graziella Sassi, Italy
ogy pharmacy, medication error prevention and  N Victor Jimenez Torres, Spain
patient related issues.
 Johan Vandenbroucke, Belgium
A total of 15 documents were entered into the In the writing of the Standard, a number of other
database and analysed. The sources of documents resources were consulted, including:
examined included:
 EudraLex GMP Guideline
 Workers Compensation Board of British  US NIOSH Alert
Columbia (CAN)  US OSHA Guideline
 British Columbia Cancer Agency (CAN)  GMP Hospital, Netherlands
 German Cytotoxic Workgroup (GER)  GMP Hospital, France

ß SAGE Publications 2007


Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore 10.1177/1078155207082350
2 ISOPP Standards of Practice

 Italian Guideline for Safe Handling the draft document upon agreement of the majority
 MARC Guidelines (Internet) of the committee. Not everyone will agree with every
 QuapoS (Quality Standard for the Oncology detail given in the final document, but the Standards
Pharmacy Service) DGOP Committee considers this Standard ‘‘Evidence Based’’
 Kwaliteitshandboek Cytostatica, NKI-AVL, in some parts and ‘‘Best Practice’’ in others.
Netherlands As discussed during the General Assembly of ISOPP
 Handling Cytotoxic Drugs – Industrial Medicine in Torino, Italy, in 2004, the committee is aiming at
Assurance Company, Switzerland a high level with this Standard. This means that
 Professional Organisation for Health and perhaps many practitioners may not fully comply
Industrial Medicine, Germany with the Standard as written today, but the Standard
 ASHP guide for Compounding Sterile should be seen as something we all can work
Preparations towards. There is a clear goal for ISOPP members
 Preparation and Administration of Anti Cancer around the world. Whereas some of us will success-
Drugs, France fully comply within a relatively short period of
 CAMROQ Education and Training CD ROM, Risk time, others will struggle to fully comply with
Control and Quality of Chemotherapy Handling this Standard. However, they will have at their
– 5 European Countries (France, Belgium, Spain, disposal, documentation of what is regarded as best
Portugal, Poland) practice and will know exactly what should be
 Quality Standard on Oncology Pharmacy asked of Pharmacy Directors and Hospital
Services (DGOP/ESOP 2nd Polish German Administrators.
annual conference for oncology pharmacy We wish all our ISOPP colleagues good luck in the
‘‘Therapy for practice’’) development of a safe and high quality oncology
In addition, the personal experience of the writers pharmacy service.
played an important role in the creation of this work.
Where specific references are used, these are quoted Regards
and listed at the end of the appropriate Section.
Drafts of each Section were reviewed and dis- Thomas Connor
cussed by the writing team and the reviewing group, Robert McLauchlan
consisting of members from Mexico, Japan, Johan Vandenbroucke
Singapore, Canada, Belgium, Germany and South
Africa. Each reviewer was able to provide comments. ISOPP Standards Committee Co-Chairs
These comments were discussed and integrated into April 2006

You might also like