Critical Appraisal Penelitian

Tujuan Umum :
Mahasiswa memiliki kemampuan untuk menilai secara kritis kesahihan dan kemampu-
terapan informasi kedokteran berbasis bukti (Evidence-Based Medicine) dan menjelaskan
serta memecahkan masalah yang berhubungan dengan masalah konfirmasi tes penyaringan
atau diagnosis penyakit pasien.
Sumber: (https://srs-mcmaster.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Critical-Review-Form-
Quantitative-Studies-English.pdf)
NO CITATION Provide the full citation for this article in APA
SITASI format:

1 STUDY PURPOSE Outline the purpose of the study. How does the study
TUJUAN PENELITIAN apply to your research question?
J
Was the purpose stated clearly?

Yes
No

2 LITERATURE Describe the justification of the need for this study.

Was relevant background

literature reviewed?

yes
No

3 DESIGN Describe the study design. Was the design

appropriate for the study question? (e.g. for
Randomized (RCT) knowledge level about this issue, outcomes, ethical
Cohort issues, etc)
Single case design
Before and after Specify any biases that may have been operating and
Case-control the direction of their influence on the results
Cross-sectional
Case study

4 SAMPLE Sampling (who; characteristics; how many; how was

sampling done?). If more than one group, was there
N= similarity between the group?
Was the sample describe in
detail? Describe ethics procedures. Was informed consent
obtained?
yes
no

Was sample size justified?

Yes
No

5 OUTCOMES Specify the frequency of the outcome measurement

(i.e., pre, post, follow-up)
Were the outcome measures
 reliable? Outcome areas: List measures used:

Yes
No
Not addressed (tidak
dijelaskan)
6 INTERVENTION Provide a short description of the intervention
(focus, who delivered it, how often, setting). Could
Intervention was described in the intervention be replicated in practice?
detail?
Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A

Contamination was avoided?

Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A (tidak dilakukan)

Cointervention was avoided?

Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A

7 RESULTS What were the results? Were they statistically

Hasil significant (i.e., p < 0.05)? If not statistically
significant, was study big enough to show an
Results were reported in terms of important difference if it should occur? If there were
statistical significance? multiple outcomes, was that taken into account for
the statistical analysis?
Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A (tidak dilakukan)

Clinical importance was

reported?
Apakah kemaknaan klinis
dilaporkan?

Yes
 No
Not addressed (tidak
dijelaskan)

8 Were the analysis method(s) What was the clinical importance of the results?
appropriate? Were differences between groups clinically
meaningful? (if applicable)
Yes
No
Not addressed (tidak
dijelaskan)

9 Drop-outs were reported? Did any participants drop out from the study? Why?
(Were reasons given and were drop-outs handled
Yes appropriately?)
No

10 CONCLUSIONS AND What did the study conclude? What are the
IMPLICATIONS implications of these results for practice? What were
Simpulan dan Dampaknya the main limitations or biases in the study?

Conclusions were appropriate

given study methods and results

Yes
No