SKENARIO 1: Critical Appraisal Penelitian Kuantitatif

(CROSS-SECTIONAL, CASE CONTROL, Eksperimen)

Tujuan Umum :
Mahasiswa memiliki kemampuan untuk menilai secara kritis kesahihan dan kemampu-
terapan informasi kedokteran berbasis bukti (Evidence-Based Medicine) dan menjelaskan
serta memecahkan masalah yang berhubungan dengan masalah konfirmasi tes penyaringan
atau diagnosis penyakit pasien.
Tujuan Khusus :
1. Mahasiswa mampu memahami tahapan telaah kritis dengan menggunakan panduan yang
sesuai, dalam hal ini penelitian kuantitatif
1. Mahasiswa mampu memahami metodologi yang digunakan.
a. bagaimana menentukan populasi dan sample
b. bagaimana menentukan kelompok perlakuan (intervention) atau pembanding (control)
c. memahami cara interpretasi hasil dan pembahasan
d. memahami apa yang dimaksud randomisasi
3. mahasiswa mampu memahami perbedaan diantara ke empat jenis penelitian tersebut
4. Mahasiswa mampu menerapkan kepada rencana penelitiannya.

Kegiatan pertemuan pertama pada tutorial :

1. Membahas secara detail isi dan cara aplikasi tool riset kuantitatif
2. Mempraktekkan pada 1 artikel dari my klass tutorial
Penugasan perorangan yaitu : mencari 1 artikel international bereputasi kemudia mahasiswa
melakukan review pada tabel tool tersebut kemudian di unggah di my klass sebelum pertemuan
ke dua. Judul artikel dan diasin harus bervariasi

Kegiatan pertemuan kedua pada tutorial :

1. Melakukan praktek kritisi artikel pada 4 artikel dari my klass tutorial
2. Presentasi singkat artikel dan hasil telaahnya dengan menyesuaikan waktu yang ada
1.
CITATION Provide the full citation for this article in APA format:
SITASI
STUDY PURPOSE Outline the purpose of the study. How does the study apply
TUJUAN PENELITIAN to your research question?

Was the purpose stated clearly?

Yes
No

LITERATURE Describe the justification of the need for this study.

Was relevant background

literature reviewed?

yes
No

DESIGN Describe the study design. Was the design appropriate for
the study question? (e.g. for knowledge level about this
Randomized (RCT) issue, outcomes, ethical issues, etc)
Cohort
Single case design Specify any biases that may have been operating and the
Before and after direction of their influence on the results
Case-control
Cross-sectional
Case study

SAMPLE Sampling (who; characteristics; how many; how was

sampling done?). If more than one group, was there
N= similarity between the group?
Was the sample describe in
detail? Describe ethics procedures. Was informed consent
obtained?
yes
no

Was sample size justified?

Yes
No

OUTCOMES Specify the frequency of the outcome measurement (i.e.,

pre, post, follow-up)
Were the outcome measures
reliable?
Outcome areas: List measures used:

Yes
No
Not addressed

INTERVENTION Provide a short description of the intervention (focus, who

delivered it, how often, setting). Could the intervention be
Intervention was described in replicated in practice?
detail?
Yes
No
Not addressed (tidak
dijelaskan)
N/A (tidak dilakukan)

Contamination was avoided?

Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A

Cointervention was avoided?

Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A

RESULTS What were the results? Were they statistically significant

(i.e., p < 0.05)? If not statistically significant, was study big
enough to show an important difference if it should occur?
Results were reported in terms If there were multiple outcomes, was that taken into
of statistical significance? account for the statistical analysis?

Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A

Clinical importance was

reported?
Apakah
 Yes
No
Not addressed
N/A

Were the analysis method(s) What was the clinical importance of the results? Were
appropriate? differences between groups clinically meaningful? (if
applicable)
Yes
No
Not addressed

N/A

Drop-outs were reported? Did any participants drop out from the study? Why? (Were
reasons given and were drop-outs handled appropriately?)
Yes
No

CONCLUSIONS AND
IMPLICATIONS
Conclusions were appropriate
given study methods and results
What did the study conclude? What are the implications of
these results for practice? What were the main limitations
or biases in the study?

Yes
No