Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Novel Approach For Spectral Analysis of Monitored Power Systems
A Novel Approach For Spectral Analysis of Monitored Power Systems
SNR = I 0 loglo( 51, and MLPNN techniques perform frequency and amplitude
estimations under a less severe SNR condition given by (6).
N-I
p = n=o
kH.0 Cn)p
N '
I
I I
-, "J4
(7)
is high. In (5)-(7) s H , o ( n ) , s H , , ( n ) , and sIH,,(n) are the
fundamental, the i-th harmonic and the j-th inter-harmonic Fig. 1. The NF-WDF? Scheme.
component samples, respectively, of the monitored signal; and
In this scheme, the NFo block implements a second-order
N is the length of the analyzed signal. It is evident that the
adaptive notch filter (ANF) based on higher order statistics
S N R can be increased by eliminating all harmonics, inter-
(HOS) [IO]. The second-order ANF is applied to track a
harmonics and transients components. In such a case, the new
coarse estimation of the frequency of the fundamental
S N R value is given by
component. Thereafter, a better estimation of the amplitude
and frequency of the fundamental component is performed by
256
the WDFTo block. The WDFTo block implements a WDFT uiH,j
<U: because the characteristics of notch filter; and
with N / 4 basis vectors, whose warped frequencies are near
is the phase delay introduced by the previous notch
the coarse estimation obtained by using the second-order
ANF. N is the length of the analyzed signal. Next, a Taylor filters The S N R value of the signal given by (1 I ) is equivalent
expansion of order 2 is fitted to the maximum magnitude of to the SNRNER given by (8). This is a very interesting result
WDFT sample and its left and right neighbors as suggested in because a low-power noise contributes to the improvement of
[Ill. In a final step, a MLPNN technique [I61 is applied to the performance of estimation techniques such as FFT,
estimate the amplitude, frequency and phase values from the WDFT, Kalman, PLL, etc.
warped amplitude, frequency, and phase values obtained by The motivation behind the use of N-point WDFT, which is
using the WDFT. a special case of the NDFT (nonuninform DFT [14]) is that
After that, the second-order notch filter in each NF block is this transform performs a nonuniform mapping of the
configured' based on the frequency of each harmonic analyzed signal on the unit cycle and requires few samples to
component. Note that, the parameter of the second-order notch estimate the frequency of a sinusoidal signal [ 111. The same
filter implemented in the NFo block is based on the Go value, kind of nonuniform mapping can be achieved by using the
chup transform at a higher computational complexity, but
while the NFl,...,NFH blocks implement second-order notch
demands a higher computational complexity. The N-point
filters with notch frequencies equal to
WDFT is given by
51
&H,i = icjH,o< x , i = 1,..., M . The WDFT, ,...,WDFTMblocks
implement a WDFT with only three hasis vectors and make -j-k
2n "
use of the same procedure applied to the WDFT, and MLPNN
X [ k ]"
=4y x ( ~ ) [ ~-j-k* + ~ ,k=O,...,N-1, (14)
blocks to estimate the amplitude and phase of the harmonic
components. The z-transform of the transfer function of the i- l+ae
tb second-order notch filter is given by [12]
where a* denotes the complex conjugate value of a . The
1 + U$ + 2-2 -
-
I-2cos(q)z-' +z-* mapping is controlled by the warping parameter a . By
H , ( z )=
1 + p , a , d + p:z-' 1 - 2p, cos(y)z-' + piz-' selecting a suitably complex-valued warping parameter, we
i = O , ..., M can place a large number of frequency samples in the main
lobe of the signal spectrum resulting in a good estimation of
(9) tbe frequency and amplitude values.
For stability, the constant pi is selected somewhat less The coarse estimation of the coefficient a. of the second-
than a unity. Assuming that the delay is zero and pi is close order adaptive notch filter is obtained by using the linear
to an unity, then it can be seen from Fig. 1 that predictive (LP) method based on the diagonal fourth-order
xi (n) = mixed cumulant slice (FOMCS) of the input signal that is
expressed by [lo]
1
) AH,ocos(nwH,o+
x(n + d H , o - + AOH,,), if i = 0,
cos(nwH,j
Xi-i(n+d~,i-i)-C;.=~A~ ,j + @ ~ +, A
j e~,j),
?*(r)cL)= ? x ( r , r , r ) ( L )I =(c:ibx(n)x'(n
- +r)
L
L-1 1
otherwise, -3z:Ibx(n)x(n + r)z,=,x (n+ TI) (15)
(10) r = 0,..., P- I, 2 5 P 5 L - 1
251
achieved if the f, is increased. In low SNR condition we
observed that the ANF does not converge. So, in this case, we
consider the coarse frequency estimation equal to 60 Hz and
(19) perform the WDFT implemented in the WDFT, block twice.
In order to analyze the amplitude estimation performance
of the NF-WDFT under the presence of harmonic components
(20) in the monitored power system we considered U: = -20 dB.
-
respectively. Note that A H , i , &,H.i, and
- are the warped 1.25 cycles of fundamental component is used by NF-WDFT
and DFT-WDFT approaches at f, = 60 x 64 Hz while the
amplitude, angular 6equency, and phase values; ASH,i
FFT used 1 (128-point FFT) and 2 (256-point FFT) cycles at
denotes the distortion generated by the previous notch filters; f,=128x60 Hz [7]. Tables 2, 3 and 4 show the real
g A ( . ), ga(.),and go(.) represent the nonlinear mapping
amplitude values of fundamental and harmonic components
performed by the MLPNN, respectively. To get an efficient (first column) as well as their estimated values obtained by
MLPNN we also consider a second-order optimization NF-WDFT, DFT-WDFT and FFT.
method called modified version of the Scaled Conjugated The results in Tables 2, 3 and 4 have been obtained by
Gradient method (MVSCGM) as in [I61 for the MLPNN considering fo equal to 57.0 Hz, 60.01 Hz and 62.50 Hz,
trainiig procedure.
respectively. The data in each table has been obtained by
performing 5000 Monte Carlo simulations. The structure of
W . SIMULATION R!2SULTS
the MLPNN for the amplitude estimation is 2 x 5 x 1 . As it can
This section compares the performances of the NF-WDFT, he observed the NF-WDFT, at low sampling rate, shows
DFT-WDFT and FFT approaches. The harmonic information better amplitude estimation than the 256-point FFT.
was obtained 60m [I51 and synthetically generated using Particularly, we can also observe that for low amplitude
MATLAB. Table 1 shows the results obtained by using the values much better estimation results are attained by using
NF-WDFT and DFT-WDFT (with 64-point DFT) approaches NF-WDFT.
to estimate the frequency of the fundamental component of a With regarding to how the performance of the amplitude
signal given by estimation technique influences the THD evaluation, the last
x ( n ) = sH(n)+ v(n) = AH,ocos(noH,, + e,.,)+ TOW of Table 2, 3 and 4 shows the real and estimated THD.
(21) From these results, it is clear that NF-WDFT provides a
1 ; = 1 A H , k i cos(BkiaH,O + @ H , k i ) + v ( n ) , ki = 3 x i , superior THD estimation than other approaches. At the end, it
is worth mentioning that the NF-WDFT remains a delay to
where i = 0, ...,7 are uniform random variables in the provide a coarse frequency estimation performed by the
interval [0,2x) and v ( n ) is a zero mean Gaussian noise with adaptive notch filter and to get the steady-state conditions of
a variance c:. The values A H , k i ,i = O ,.._, 7 are equal to the notch filters.
To analyze the performance of the (1 x 3 x 1) MLPNN to
1.000, 0.757, 0.426, 0.145, 0.025, 0.009, 0.058, and 0.007,
estimate the phase of the sinusoid component 6 0 m the warped
respectively. The chosen sample rate is f, = 64 x 60 Hz. The
phase values, we consider the signal
OH 0
values for f H , o=-f, are 57.43 Hz,60.11 Hz, and 62.89 x(n) = COs(nOH,O + @H,O) 3 (22)
2rr
Hz,respectively. 1.25 cycles of fundamental component are
used by the NF-WDFT and DFT-WDFT approaches. The where mH,o =- 2n60'11 and So is an uniform random variable
60 x 64
performance is evaluated in terms of S N R value given by (5) in the interval [0,2n). For the training and testing procedures,
and performing 5000 Monte Carlo simulations. Also, we
we generated 3600 and 36000 sequences { x ( n ) } , respectively.
'assume pi =0.9985 and lal=0.9. The structure of the
The length of each sequence {x(rr)} is equal to 1.25 cycles of
MLPNN for the 6equency estimation is 2 x 6 ~ 1 It. means
the fundamental component. The performance of the MLPNN
that the MLPNN has two input, 6 neurons in the hidden layer,
in terms of MSE value is shown in Table 5. As it can be seen,
and one output.
the MLPNN attains very good results. In fact, the second-
As can be seen, in all cases the proposed method
order optimization method provides an efficient and simple
outperforms the DFT-WDFT based method. Also, it can be
MLPNN for this kind of estimation.
observed that under low SNR Conditions the NF-WDFT
provides a much better estimation than the DFT-WDFT [ll].
In fact, an SNR improvement is observed in the input of
WDFTO block of the NF-WDFT approach that results in a
good condition for frequency estimation. Although it is not
showed, we also noticed that better estimation results can be
258
TABLE1. FREQUENCY ESmnONPERFORMANCE
* (I) NF-WDFT
** (II) DFT-WDFT
TABLE
2. AMPLITWOE AND TIu)ESTMATION
PERFORMANCE fundamental and harmonic components. Also, it can be point
out that the proposed method attains better results than
previous approaches for amplitude and frequency estimations.
Issues related to finite-precision implementation with delta
and shift operators as well as comparison with Kalman and
PLL techniques are under investigation by the authors.
VI. REFERENCES
[I] J. Arrillaga, M. H. J. Bolleq and N. R Watson, “Power quality
following deregulation,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 2, pp.
246-261, Feb. 2WO.
121 C. Melhom and M. F. M c h a g h m , “Interpretation and analysis of
power quality measurements,” IEEE T r a m on l n d w h y Applications,
TABLE3. AMPLITUDEAND THD ESTIMATIONPERFORMANCE vol. 31,no. 6,pp. 1363-1370, Nov.iDec. 1995.
128 I 256 I 131 M. H. J. Bollen, Power Quolih Problems: Voltaae S q s orrd
Intemptiorts, IEEE Press, NI, 2C€IO.
141 IEEE Recommended oroetice for monitorim eleclric D O W ~ ouolin.
L . ~
259